Print proofing workflow

I'm finally starting to sit down and learn how to use Aperture's proofing workflow. It seems to be a bit lacking and there are some really obvious improvements that could be made.
1) There isn't any black-point compensation on the proof view, it's really hard to tell when the dark areas are going to clip. Come to think of it, there aren't any options for how the proofing is displayed. Someone mentioned in the past that the proofing uses Absolute Colorimetric (or another clipping intent). Ouch.
2) There's no underflow indicator. Considering there's a overflow indicator (Show Hot Spots) it seems like a fairly obvious feature. I'm trying to figure out when my blacks are going to clip and it's not easy. As a workaround I keep having to zoom in with 'z' because the loupe doesn't work with proofing.
3) I want to use the compare tools to compare the original alongside a proofed version that I'm trying to tweak to get as close to the original as possible. This isn't possible because the proofing is applied to all visible images. I need to be able to turn on proofing for one image only.
4) The export options don't have any options for intent.
So far most of my Photoshop proofing workflow isn't really panning out in Aperture. How many of you are using Aperture as the proofing tool? For those that are, am I missing something? Pros do print things out, right?
PS: I found a pretty cool article with great examples about rendering intents here: http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/12641-1.html
Dual 1.8 G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   1GB RAM, Sony Artisan Monitor, Sony HC-1 HD Camera

Sean, nice list. Have you submitted your wants to Apple yet?
As for me, I've gotten some nice proof prints out of the program using both the histogram and a calibrated monitor. So far, what I've gotten out of my Epson 2200 has matched what I've seen on my 23" cinema display.
Jeff Weinberg

Similar Messages

  • Print proofing in CS2 - different to results

    Help!
    Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong. I have a calibrated monitor and profiles for my printer and paper I am using. When I get a photo just right in Photoshop with the proofing on I then print with preview and what is shown is different, a lot darker and more contrasty. The "wrong" preview is what is actually pronted. It seems as though the print proofing is somehow not working. This is the same for all the printer profiles I have, even for on-line printers!. I have set that CS2 should control color management on the printer set up.
    Help. I am pulling my hair out(what's left of it!)

    Hi,
    How is the PDF generated ? via external send in messages ? or by FM in print program ?
    If it is via external send, the problem is with the device type used in SCOT. Please check
    Regards
    Seema

  • Printing Proofs in Lightroom

    I'm using Lightroom for management of my digital images, and wish that Adobe would provide a way for additional output methods from the Print tab.
    I recently had to output a large amount of proofs, and was able to successfully build the proofs in lightroom. I use the ColorBurst 7.5.1 RIP Server to run my Epson Pro 7800; have no problem with color printing from Photoshop on any of the media I use. Printing to this RIP works best when you are able to save an image file, such as TIF, and then drop the image in the Hot Folder; the RIP takes over from there.
    I use an Xrite Colorimiter and the Colorbutst Spectral Vison Pro software to adjust my ink percentage and manage ICC printing profiles with great success.
    I keep all my monitors calibrated, do so every two weeks, so basically, I don't have a problem with printing or color balance, except when printing from Lightroom.
    Lightroom unfortunately won't allow me to output from the Print tab to a tiff file; I can choose PostScript or PDF, but then to preview the image using the ICC profile for the paper I'm using, I have to import into Photoshop, which is not that easy.
    I tried printing the PDF files, and had a problem with the images rotating 90 degrees, and with the proofs being too dark.
    Here's what I was able to work out, in order to print my proofs successfully.
    After having my proofs set up in Lightroom, I selected the PPD for my printer, and hit the Print button. I then went to the PDF button, and saved the files as PDFs to iPhoto.
    In iPhoto, I exported to TIF files, then opened the TIF files in Photoshop. I viewed the TIF files with the ICC profile for the paper I was using, then made necessay adjustments, and saved them as TIFs without any ICC profile.
    After dropping these TIF files in the Hot Folder they printed correctly.
    What would have saved me a LOT of time and ink and paper, would be to export directly from the Lightroom PRINT tab into Photoshop (like you can from Library or Develop), so I could create my output files directly from Lightroom.
    If anyone wants to comment or offer suggestions on a different print workflow, I'd love to hear it.
    --Mark Johnson

    >What would have saved me a LOT of time and ink and paper, would be to export directly from the Lightroom PRINT tab into Photoshop (like you can from Library or Develop), so I could create my output files directly from Lightroom.
    Check out the 2.0 beta. It allows for output from the print module directly to jpeg files in any printing profile or one of the three standard color spaces. The sharpening is also vastly improved there.

  • Printing proofs w/ Pantone in CS4 vs CS5

    Good days all,
    I have found that our proof out came out with different.
    The file was created in Illustrator CS4 and proceeded in CS5.
    The file includes;
    1. One PSD link file includes two pantone in channels
    2. Blur effect for the drop shadow
    3. general designed layout
    EPS file was created base on above condition and sent to our RIP (ORIS) / Printed in Epson7900.
    We have tried with embedded images and linked images but same printout.
    Then we notify that the color proofs printed with somewhat different different pantone value.
    the pantone color that originally created in PSD file has one pantone that not flat color but screened effect + another pantone with 100%.
    We tried with opening Original CS4 file to create EPS file for printout and they are printing different pantone value.
    Same pantone but different print out result.
    My question is is there different pantone engine in CS4 vs CS5 when they print transparence + overprint effect?
    what should be resolved to have the CS5 to become more like CS4 EPS output?
    I hope I make myself clear on this.
    Is anybody has similar problem?

    We are not aware of any invalid PostScript being generated by InDesign 8 (CS6). However, from release to release of Adobe software, we definitely make changes in the generated PostScript (and similarly exported PDF and EPS) to account for new or updated features and to fix anomalies in previous releases.
    It is possible that the Xerox FreeFlow VI Design Pro software is modifying the PostScript generated by InDesign (perhaps to merge variable data in some way?) and is doing so based upon pattern matching that works with the PostScript generated by InDesign 6 (CS4) but not with InDesign 8, yielding modified PostScript which is then rejected by whatever PostScript interpreter is ultimately processing that modified PostScript.
    Your “mailing programmer” might want to contact Xerox to ascertain whether they may have an update to their software.
         - Dov

  • Alternative print booklet workflow

    Hey All,
    I'm using Mac OSX (10.7.5), Cloud applications, the latest Adobe PPD 9.1.
    The workflow is such: File > print booklet > save PS > Distill.
    The problem is that transparency disappears.
    Has anyone had experience with the same symptoms/issues?

    @Peter – yes, could be that the ADBPDF9.ppd is crucial here.
    However, today I visited the page where ADBPDF9.ppd was linked to by Adobe, and the PPD wasn't available.
    Error | Save as PDF options unsupported | Create PDF | InDesign, Illustrator | Mac OS 10.6 or later
    The link in "Solution / Install Acrobat PPD" under InDesign 4. will not work anymore.
    If you rightclick and download you will get a file that is named ADBPDF9.ppd, but it's contents will be the following web page:
    https://helpx.adobe.com/content/dam/kb/en/852/cpsid_85257/attachments/ADPDF9.PPD
    Maybe it's just my browser?
    Or did Adobe pulled the resource?
    Uwe

  • Printing/Sharing workflow documentation

    I have been working a bit with Processes in WL Workshop 8.1sp2. The
    printing of a relatively large workflow seems a bit kludgy. I remember back
    in my Er/Win days I'd be able to scale the print, keep it from printing
    blank pages, or fit the entire workflow on a page, etc. I know it's more of
    a wf development tool than a modeling tool, but is there any way anyone out
    there is exporting the XML into Visio or something so we could print these
    flows easier?
    Or is my throwback option only the ole' CTRL-ALT-PrintScreen?
    Thanks,
    Ken Rimple

    It was posted yesterday at http://service.sap.com/instguides -> SAP NetWeaver -> Release 04 -> Operations -> MDM
    It is covered in the MDM 5.5 SP02 - Data Manager Client Reference Guide
    Message was edited by: Glen Leslie

  • Printing proofs w/ Canon Pro 9000 MarkII

    I'm relatively new to InDesign, having done mostly web design up until recently.  I've designed a brochure and want to print out a proof using a Canon Pro 9000 MarkII printer to get an accurate view of the colors.  Sadly, I can't figure out how to turn off color management on the printer and have searched for the better part of a day to figure this out.  Does anyone have any ideas of how to do this or how to effectively allow InDesign to perform all the color management.  Thank you!

    Take a look at http://forums.adobe.com/message/3843338#3843338 and see if you can convince toyboy to either tell you privately waht he knows, or go ahead and make it public. It's not like anyone really knows who he is.

  • How can i print proof of a recipents file view

    hi i need to print the history view on a dcoument i sent how can i do that

    Unfortunately, there is no feature that provides this functionality. The only option would be to take a screenshot of the history view and then print that.
    If you find that this is something that would be helpful for your work, please suggest it in the Adobe Send Ideas forum.

  • Book printing - Unique Workflows? - Cross-Posted from Aperture forum

    (Cross-posted. I think this post might be of interest to iPhoto users as well)
    I am exploring the book printing features in Aperture. My goal was to build the book in Aperture and get this into iPhoto so that I could use MyPublisher to print the book. MyPublisher currently has a 50% off coupon for orders over $50. iPhoto needs their plugin to upload to MyPublisher instead of Apple when the BuyBook button is chosen. (code is MAC2550 - good though Dec 31). The design features in Aperture are rudimentary at best. It's simple to customize the design for photo placement, adding and deleting photos, resizing, etc. The type design features are not simple to customize, though. However, with patience a suitable design can be made. You can add and delete text boxes at will but these will always default to the template's built in style. I continually had to reformat the type by right clicking on the selected text and applying my preferred style. One trick when cutting and pasting text is to place the cursor one letter in from the beginning of a preformatted line, select the remaining text and paste - this will pick up the current style rather than default to the template default. Then delete the leftover first character of the line. From Aperture I printed the book to PDF, being sure to choose letter size and borderless paper option. Once book is printed to PDF I opened in Acrobat and "saved as" to PNG. In the PNG options I chose 600ppi (the default of 300ppi might have been just fine for quality, not sure). Saving to PNG creates an individual file for each page. In testing Apple's Preview software for this I found it would make a nice PNG - but of just one page at a time. I then imported all PNG pages into iPhoto. Within iPhoto create a book. I used "Modern Lines" with double sided pages. To create the cover (it's actually a label that is adhered to the linen hard cover book) I had to import the actual cover photo used in Aperture to recreate a new design based on the "Modern Lines" template. I then recreated my pages using the template. The key step being to assign the single photo page design for each page. For each page I dropped in the corresponding PNG file which included all type and images created previously in Aperture. One minor point when adjusting the placed PNG images in the iPhoto template is the option to fit photo to frame size (an option when right clicking on the photo). When fit photo is selected the image gets resized very slightly. I opted not to use this feature as I thought the resizing might compromise quality. I then clicked on the "buy book" button and the file was assembled and sent to MyPublisher. Since I had the 50% coupon I opted for the leather bound book option and ordered two 24 page books for $53.74 which included $9.98 standard FedEx fee. As for quality I'll have to wait and see. I'll post back once books are in hand.

    It is important to realize there are two aspects to an index.
    1) Topics
    2) Page References
    Topics have no relation to the text of the actual document. Topics can
    be imported from one InDesign document to another. Also, creating topics
    from a list of text is trivial. Just type all the words (or place them
    from a text document or Word doc) and then press Ctrl+A to select all of
    them and press Ctrl+Alt+Shift+[, then delete the text.
    Page references, however are not as simple. These have to be created at
    each place in the text where you want the page to be referenced it the
    index. This *can* in fact be done Word if you are using the text from
    the Word document.
    What you really have to watch out for is that when you want to create a
    page reference you have the "Reference" radio button selected in the
    index panel. Otherwise you will just be creating a topic. It is best to
    work with hidden characters turned on so you can see and make sure
    InDesign created an index marker in the text after you created your page
    reference.

  • Book printing - Unique Workflows? - Post yours to inform others

    I am exploring the book printing features in Aperture. My goal was to build the book in Aperture and get this into iPhoto so that I could use MyPublisher to print the book. MyPublisher currently has a 50% off coupon for orders over $50. iPhoto needs their plugin to upload to MyPublisher instead of Apple when the BuyBook button is chosen. (code is MAC2550 - good though Dec 31). The design features in Aperture are rudimentary at best. It's simple to customize the design for photo placement, adding and deleting photos, resizing, etc. The type design features are not simple to customize, though. However, with patience a suitable design can be made. You can add and delete text boxes at will but these will always default to the template's built in style. I continually had to reformat the type by right clicking on the selected text and applying my preferred style. One trick when cutting and pasting text is to place the cursor one letter in from the beginning of a preformatted line, select the remaining text and paste - this will pick up the current style rather than default to the template default. Then delete the leftover first character of the line. From Aperture I printed the book to PDF, being sure to choose letter size and borderless paper option. Once book is printed to PDF I opened in Acrobat and "saved as" to PNG. In the PNG options I chose 600ppi (the default of 300ppi might have been just fine for quality, not sure). Saving to PNG creates an individual file for each page. In testing Apple's Preview software for this I found it would make a nice PNG - but of just one page at a time. I then imported all PNG pages into iPhoto. Within iPhoto create a book. I used "Modern Lines" with double sided pages. To create the cover (it's actually a label that is adhered to the linen hard cover book) I had to import the actual cover photo used in Aperture to recreate a new design based on the "Modern Lines" template. I then recreated my pages using the template. The key step being to assign the single photo page design for each page. For each page I dropped in the corresponding PNG file which included all type and images created previously in Aperture. One minor point when adjusting the placed PNG images in the iPhoto template is the option to fit photo to frame size (an option when right clicking on the photo). When fit photo is selected the image gets resized very slightly. I opted not to use this feature as I thought the resizing might compromise quality. I then clicked on the "buy book" button and the file was assembled and sent to MyPublisher. Since I had the 50% coupon I opted for the leather bound book option and ordered two 24 page books for $53.74 which included $9.98 standard FedEx fee. As for quality I'll have to wait and see. I'll post back once books are in hand.

    Thanks for the information that you provided.  However, I already have a stamps.com account and when I log in, it shows my balance.  It just will not let me print netstamps.  I am coming up with an eror message:  There was an internal processing error.  Please retry or manually check the firmware updates.
    My printer has the most current firmware.  
    This is a great feature, but I cannot get it to do anything but let me log into my account using my user name and password.    do I need to set up another account, because that would be redundant if I have to.
    Any information tha you can provide would be extremely helpful.
    Thanks in advance.

  • InCopy Proofing Workflow for multiple editors - How do you do it?

    We are using InCopy CS3 for our monthly magazine and have successfully completed the first issue. It went fairly smooth, but we are still playing with how the two editors keep track of the proofing. Knowing who has look at what, when and if they have fully made changes or not has been difficult.
    We would like to know what others are doing for this part of the work flow.
    How do you keep track of edit proofs, how many have been completed, who looked at what and when. Currently our editors are adding a note to the end of each body copy and they put their initials in it when they are done with a proof. Then the next one to look at it adds theirs when complete. Sometimes the proof goes back and forth a few times before returning to the designer. Inevitably it heads back to proofing again after the designer has cleaned it up. Knowing who has it and who still needs to look at it can get confusing. Sometimes an editor forgets to proof an article and the only way to remind them is to send an email after noticing it has not come back to the designer, or talk to them in person.
    Does anyone have a better/different way/ways of keeping track of the proofing process? Any ideas that we may be able to integrate into our work flow would be great. Thanks!

    Thanks Robert. That is what I thought you meant by slug.
    We have tried that, and currently use it. Works well for notes in the document outside of the text boxes, but it does nothing for alerting an editor that they need to look at the proof. Or keep track of where everything is in the process without opening each part of the magazine.
    Any other ideas out there? Does anyone else run into issues with keeping track of the process and what is done, in progress, etc.?
    Thanks!

  • Printing using Proof settings results in very different output from Shop vs ID

    Shop and InDesign come out with very different color values using the same settings when printing with Proof Settings.  Anyone know why, or which is correct?  Here's my scenario:
    1. In the color settings for both apps I turn off Black Point Compensation, Use Dither and Compensate for Scene referred profiles (some are Shop only obviously).  Other than that it is default settings.
    2. I create a CMYK document with 4 squares.  Filled with 100% Cyan,  100% Magenta,  100% Yellow,  and 100% Black respectively.  Setup the Working CMYK in both apps to Coated Forga27.
    4. I setup a Custom Proof condition with an ISO Uncoated Yellowish CMYK profile.  Preserve CMYK Numbers and Black point compensation are both unchecked.
    5. In the Print engine I set Color Management to Use Proof settings, Color handling done by the application, and leave the Printer profile set to the CMYK working space (Coated Forga27), and Output Color as Composite CMYK in ID.  Black Point compensation is also unchecked here.
    6. Now when I print to file and Distill (job settings set to leave color unchanged and compression is off) the resulting files from both apps here is what I get:
    InDesign CS4:
    Cyan square (C:84 M:14.6 Y:0 K:0 ), Magenta square (C:2.9 M:84.9 Y:14.1 K:0 ), Yellow square (C:0 M:6.2 Y:84.1 K:0 ), Black square (C:67 M:62.75 Y:56.86 K:46.28 )
    PhotoShop CS4:
    Cyan square (C:92.94 M:12.55 Y:5.49 K:0 ), Magenta square (C:5.49 M:94.51 Y:13.73 K:0 ), Yellow square (C:0 M:5.49 Y:92.94 K:0 ), Black square (C:83.14 M:85.49 Y:78.04 K:98.82 )
    Needless to say the results are very different.  I went ahead and did some manual Profile -> Profile conversions in Shop to see what is happening and it seems like Shop is doing a conversion from the Documents assigned CMYK ->Proofing CMYK-> Printer CMYK.  But Shop adds black  point compensation in automatically for the final portion of the color  conversion (Proofing CMYK-> Printer CMYK) even if it is unchecked in the  color settings, Proofing dialog, and the print engine. 
    InDesign has an  entirely different way of "using Proof settings".  It seems that if you choose  Use Proof Settings in the print engine it just assigns Proof CMYK to the  document and Converts that to Printer CMYK.  Document CMYK is ignored  completely.  Verified this through manual conversions in Shop as  well.
    What gives?  Which do we trust?  To me it sounds like PhotoShop is doing the closest to what I would expect.. except for the addition of the sneaky black point compensation without being told to do so.  Thoughts?
    Matt

    Before digging too far, I need to understand what you're trying to achieve.
    With the print settings you describe you are instructing the application to perform two conversions. The color chain is Document CMYK (FOGRA27) – Proof CMYK (ISO Uncoated) – Document CMYK (FOGRA27).
    This is a little odd. Usually the final color space is a print device of some sort, not a press profile. This workflow you describe is a round trip of sorts. We are at FOGRA, convert to ISO, now back to FOGRA. That amounts to simulating one press condition using another press condition, which is rarely done because a press in not a proof device.
    The Proof profile is the print condition you want to simulate. The Print profile is the device doing the simulation, which is often referred to as a proofing device (quite confusing but that's the way it is).
    Photoshop Proof Setup has a Rendering Intent and BPC. InDesign Proof Setup does not.
    In the Photoshop print dialog, there is a Simulate Black Ink option. The InDesign print dialog does not have this option.
    There are two conversions on output. In Photoshop output, the first conversion is Document – Proof. The rendering and BPC options for this first conversion are based on Photoshop color settings. The second conversion is Proof - Printer. The Photoshop print dialog offers 3 options for this 2nd conversion:
    1. Simulate Black Ink Off = Relative Colorimetric, Black Point Compensation On.
    2. Simulate Black Ink On = Relative Colorimetric, Black Point Compensation Off
    3. Paper Color On = Absolute Colorimetric
    Please note the application color settings do not affect this conversion, just the first.
    For the most accurate proof #3 is the best option. That is not saying that absolute colorimetric is ideal for file conversions. It is a rendering intent that is ideal for a proofing workflow, and the conversion to the print device (the 2nd conversion in the output you describe) is what is at the heart of the proofing workflow.

  • Choosing color laser printer for proofs

    Hello!
    I need to buy a new small color laser printer to print proofs from InDesign. I have had bad experience with HP and Canon printers when transparent areas have been printed. However, Xerox smaller office printers as 6280 with true Adobe Postscript have always printed as expected but a little too dark and too much red in photos. When looking around I can only find Xerox with true Adobe Postscript. My questions are:
    - which of the postscript emulations from other manufacturers do you know works perfectly with InDesign?
    - which small color laser printers can you recommend for proofs?
    The smaller the better. Print speed is not especially important as long as print quality from InDesign is good and toner cost isn't too expensive.
    I'm looking forward your recommendations!
    Johan
    PS. I use Creative Suite 4 at the moment, not 5.5. DS.

    I don't think you're going to find a "small color laser" that really does good proofs, but that's my personal opinion. You should make some sample PDF files and get sample prints from devices you are considering.
    I just repalced my Xerox Phaser 790 last week. It was neither small nor very fast. I got samples of my files from a Phaser 7760, which is now in closeout and discounted slightly (but still not cheap) and they looked pretty good, until I looked at the prints from the newer model, the Phaser 7800, that was just introduced. Those prints blew me away, and that's what I bought. This is a tabloid size printer, commercial duty, very fast, and the base model is a little over $5000, so probably not what you had in mind. Toner is not cheap, either.
    How often do you need to proof? Commercial printers tend to proof on Epson inkjets (not the cheapies you buy at the office supply, though). The big problem with inkjets, though, is they need to be used all the time to keep the print heads from drying out or clogging, and ink and paper for proofing are more expensive than for lasers.

  • [LR 5] Soft Proofing - Monitor Gamut Warning vary with printer profile ?!?!

    Hi,
    There's something I can't understand when using the soft proofing feature in LR.
    The Monitor Gamut Warning feature (top left icon in the histogram when soft proofing is enabled) is supposed to show us what colors in the current image cannot be reproduced on the display. Right ? If I understand well, the warning computation is made by comparing the current image (virtualized by LR in the Melissa RGB color space) to the gamut of the display (read from the active calibration profile).
    So why does LR show different "out of gamut" areas for the display when I change the printer profile selected when using soft proofing? This doesn't make sense to me.
    Did I miss something?
    Thanks in advance.

    indeed they are vague about this. My thought about this comes from conversing with Adobe folks here and elsewhere as I am pretty sure I'vce discussed this on the forum before. As far as I know the monitor warning is supposed to be calculated after the conversion to the printer profile so that you get an idea whether the soft proofed color is accurately displayed. That shoud be the correct behavior as proofing can actually take a color either in or out of the monitor gamut. I am not 100% sure on this though but it certainly explains how it behaves.
    Also if you calibrate your display and write out a icc v4 display profile, the situation changes again as now the display profile can actually contain a perceptual rendering intent, making it even less precise and the assumption of simple one-to-one linear conversions between color spaces is invalid. Few calibration software packages do this though but there are a few exceptions.
    If you only want to know whether your image is outside of the display profile, you can indeed trick the soft proof to allow you to select a display profile as the printer proofing profile. You can in principle select a standard working space such as prophotoRGB there and get results that make sense. But you definitely do not want to have a random printer profile selected for the reasons cited above. I guess they could add some smartness to detect that you selected the profile of the current display and not a profile of another random display and then collapse the interface but that is such an edge case that I doubt Adobe would prioritize this. It works fine if you simply realize that you selected your monitor profile as the printer proof profile.

  • Generate and Print address proofs through ESS

    Gud morning,
    There is a requirement to provide employees the access to print proofs for address, employment certificate etc via ESS. Is there any standard service available for Letters for any country version, please let me know.
    Thanks

    ESS Services are country specific and you have to go through the Business Package [Documentation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/5b/76a6d7fd3a4e91bfb422405bf3e04d/content.htm] and find out what services are available. For example, the US version has [EVL.|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/87/1e3d4150c86e24e10000000a155106/content.htm] .
    ~Suresh

Maybe you are looking for

  • Tax Number Validation in BP transaction

    Hi experts, I'm working on a validation in Tax Number 1 field in transaction code BP when creating Business Partner. I have read that you have to create a custom FM and make your validations there and use FM 'BUS_MESSAGE_STORE' to raise an error mess

  • Adobe acrobat X pro installation takes up over 6gb of space

    Hi! I'm not really an acrobat expert. I mainly use premiere, after effects and photoshop. I mostly use acrobat to read academic articles in pdf format and I make notes to those articles with underlining etc. I have used acrobat to open hundreds of pd

  • Cisco WLC Local Net user Authentication

    Hi, I have a Controller configured with local net users. Web policy with authentication has been configured for Layer 3 security. When the user tries to access the Wireless, they will be redirected to a web authentication screen, where they need to e

  • Suddenly very slow menu BT Vision

    Hi, Ive had my Vision box for over a year now along with BT Broadband, both have been fine upto now. Boradband tests indicate the speed is suffcient and I am happy with this, however when navigating the on demand channels on the BT Vision box, it is

  • How to use varaibke manager option at RPD in obiee 10g

    Hi At RPD level , can anyone please help on uderstanding how to use the variable manager. thank you