Problem between DEV and QAS in SPDD and SPAU

Hello,
We adjusted the SPDD in the ACT_UPG and he SPAU in the post processing and everything was right.
When I try to install the QAS I gave the installer both transport but tells me this:
1 ETQ004 USER DECISIONS ABOUT PROCESS OF ADJUSTEMENTS
4 ETQ430 START reading "umodstat.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
3 ETQ433 END   reading "umodstat.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
4 ETQ427 START deciding about "SPDD" in release "701"
4 ETQ500 INFO  number of objects in repairs   : "92"
4 ETQ501 INFO  number of objects in transports: "82"
4 ETQ430 START reading "umodauto.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
4 ETQ431       "2" entries read
4 ETQ432       read: rc="2"
3 ETQ433 END   reading "umodauto.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
3WETQ498       transport "XXXXXXX" found. It seems NOT(!) to be OK
that in SPDD
3 ETQ438 END   writing entry to "umodauto.imp" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
4 ETQ454       user wants to check the transport result in "SPDD"
2 ETQ504 INFO  upgrade will halt for "SPDD" in release "701"
3 ETQ429 END   deciding about "SPDD" in release "701"
4 ETQ427 START deciding about "SPAU" in release "701"
4 ETQ500 INFO  number of objects in repairs   : "593"
4 ETQ501 INFO  number of objects in transports: "495"
4 ETQ430 START reading "umodauto.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
4 ETQ431       "2" entries read
4 ETQ432       read: rc="2"
3 ETQ433 END   reading "umodauto.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
3WETQ498       transport "XXXXXXXXXX" found. It seems NOT(!) to be OK
that is on SPAU
The system before the migration, were both recreated from a PRD backup so it should be the same.
Please help me with this

Hello Carlos,
this error is mostly related to the second run of an Upgrade (either to QA or PRD systems), when SPAU/SPDD already have a request assigned for them. Please check notes #68678 and #610311.
If this does not help, please list the content of phase PREP_INTEGRATION/ADJUSTPRP (as seen in the sapehpiconsole.log)
Best regards,
Tomas Black

Similar Messages

  • Performance problems between dev and prod

    I run the same query with identical data and indexes, but one system takes a 0.01 seconds to run while the production system takes 1.0 seconds to run. TKprof for dev is:
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDVALUE
    3 NESTED LOOPS
    1 NESTED LOOPS
    41 NESTED LOOPS
    41 NESTED LOOPS
    1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_PACKAGE
    1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032600 (object id 51356)
    41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDELEMENT
    41 AND-EQUAL
    82 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE2 (object id 53559)
    41 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE1 (object id 53558)
    41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BAND
    41 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0034599 (object id 53556)
    1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032549 (object id 51335)
    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BV1 (object id 53557)Tkprof for Prod is :
    Rows Execution Plan
    0 SELECT STATEMENT MODE: ALL_ROWS
    1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDVALUE' (TABLE)
    52001 NESTED LOOPS
    26000 NESTED LOOPS
    26000 NESTED LOOPS
    26000 NESTED LOOPS
    1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_PACKAGE' (TABLE)
    1 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018725' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
    26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDELEMENT' (TABLE)
    26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BE2' (INDEX)
    26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BAND' (TABLE)
    26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0030648' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
    26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018674' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
    26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BV1' (INDEX).The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.
    Any ideas?

    From DEV you show the Row Source Operations for the query. The column named "Rows" signifies the actual number of rows processed with each step.
    From PROD you show the Execution Plan for the query; that is, tkprof was executed with the EXPLAIN option which generates the execution plan as of the time when tkprof was run. The "Rows" column in the Explain Plan output comes from the PLAN_TABLE.CARDINALITY, which represents an estimate by the CBO for the number of rows [expected to be] processed with each step.
    So, if by <quote>The row count varies greatly</quote> you meant these "Rows" columns outputs then you're are comparing actuals from a database with estimates from another. Get the Row Source Operations from both.
    "Identical data and indexes":
    1. data may be the same, but it is not necessarily stored physically the same way.
    2. Indexes being the same means their definitions are the same; again, physically they are not necessarily identical
    In other words, data in PROD (the way it is stored on disk) may have evolved as a result of discrete deletes/updates/inserts ... in DEV it could be, for example, stored more compact if you took a copy of PROD and moved into DEV. So, the number of blocks for your segments will likely be different between PROD and DEV, the clustering factor for your indexes are likely different, etc ... things which could [and do] influence the CBO. The statistics may be different.
    I guess what I'm saying is ... it is quite hard, if not outright impossible, to get two identical databases/instances/load ... hence, don't expect the executions to be 100% identical, even if you have "identical data and indexes". By all means compare between DEV and PROD (make sure you compare the same thing though) and use the observed differences as an indicator for further investigation ... don't chase the goal of 100% identical behavior.
    Now, by all means look at that query taking 1 second in PROD ... I have only addressed <quote>The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.</quote>

  • Compare SPRO between DEV and QAs

    Hi there,
    I'm in GoLive eve and all consultants are desperate with the future problems.
    Is there a way that I can compare the customizing (SPRO) between DEV and QAS or another system?
    Thanks,
    Dany Anderson
    Edited by: Dany Anderson Alves on Mar 4, 2008 9:03 PM

    Hi,
    Use comparison tool in SCU0.
    Select SAP Reference IMG and ssay compare.
    This will show the differences if any.
    You can also compare at component level.
    cross system visibility should be maintained in SCC4 settings for the client
    Regards,
    Revathi

  • What is CTS ? what is the role of CTS in between DEV and QAS?

    Dear
    What is CTS ? what is the role of CTS in between DEV and QAS?
    Thanx & Regards
    Mohamamd Nabi
    [email protected]

    hello, friend.
    actually, you can search for subjects like this in the threads archive.  you will be pleasantly surprised to find that there are already many threads with similar issues and that you can find answers to even more otherwise unrealized questions.  and you don't have to wait for anyone to reply.
    it looks like the issue is urgent for you, and this is why i am attaching this feed from Sadhu Kishore, which was posted some time ago... (if he replies to your thread, you may choose to award him points).
    "Hi,
    The transport workflow provides a framework for transporting enhancements or new developments of existing business functions in a system landscape. It provides a direct connection between development and transport administration. The transport workflow manages the transport process, determines the user for each individual step automatically, and then displays an interface which they can use to perform the task directly.
    It is an efficient method of transporting a selected number of requests into a group of transport targets, and uses clearly defined approval steps to ensure the quality of your target systems. The requests can be transportable change requests, Customizing requests, relocation transports or transports of copies. The transport targets do not need to be located on defined transport routes. However, the transport workflow can involve some risks, caused by the dependencies between transport requests:
    Import sequence
    It is important that you import requests in the correct order, so that development work is up-to-date in the target system.
    Incompleteness
    It is important that the functions transported in the transport proposal are complete; otherwise errors may occur in the import system.
    A request is not imported, but it contains an important data element. You use another request to transport a table that references this data element. Since the referenced data element does not exist in the target system, activation errors will occur when you import the second request.
    The transport workflow is a generic workflow. Its ability to process the transport route configuration in TMS enables it to adapt itself to any system landscape. This means you can transport multiple requests into multiple targets, even if these targets are not located on the transport routes.
    This reduces the amount of work for the transport administrator significantly. The automated nature of the workflow also reduces the likelihood of errors during transports.
    You can use the transport workflow in two different ways.
    Transport workflow as a transport strategy
    If you have production systems in your landscape that can only accept approved transports, we recommend that you use the transport workflow to organize and coordinate the transport process.
    To do this, set Workflow-controlled transports as your transport strategy and configure the transport workflow.
    When you release a transport request, the transport workflow starts automatically and the screen Create Transport Proposal appears. The requests are then released implicitly when the transport proposal is sent to the transport administrator.
    Special transport workflow (mass transports)
    You can use the special transport workflow to make transports that do not follow the defined transport routes or that take place outside the normal transport schedule (part of the mass transport strategy). These transports may be corrections made in the development system that have to be transported into the production system without delay.
    To use the special transport workflow, set Mass transports as your transport strategy and configure the transport workflow."
    thanks.  you have been most generous.
    regards.

  • RFC Sender problem  between 46D and RFC adapter

    Hi,
    I have this simple integration scenario where I want to send data to a archiving system;
    SAP -> (tRFC) -> XI -> (MQ) -> BizTalk -> (MQ) Arch.syst.
    SAP side ***
    A Z-program using a Z func. like;
        CALL FUNCTION 'ZSD_DCF_SEND_TAG'
          IN BACKGROUND TASK
          DESTINATION 'XISYSTEM_TRFC_DCF'
          EXPORTING
            pt_filing_info = gt_filing.
        COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
    XI side ***
    Both IR and ID is configured correctly, in the development environment everything works just great. I have created a test program where I can define how many calls I will do, looping over the func. call with a commit inside the loop - 500 or more msgs are ok.
    The integration scenario is transported to quality enviroment using CMS, and the RFC sender comm.ch. is configured accordingly.
    The problem in quality ***
    When sending just 1 msg, everything is just fine, message received and delivered to MQ.
    When sending >= 2 msgs, the 1 msg is always ok, BUT all others fails due to the following from Adapter monitor;
    RFC_HISTORY
    - Error: 2006-01-19 10:55:18 CET: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: lookup of alternativeServiceIdentifier via CPA-cache failed for channel 'RFCSender_XI0002' (02d4d30de3593874942ed0659add0827, party '', schema 'TechnicalSystem', identifier 'Q93#120')
    - OK: 2006-01-19 10:55:17 CET: Message processed for interface ZSD_DCF_SEND_TAG
    My sending system is Q93 CLI 505 so I can understand the error, BUT I cannot understand why the RFC adapter is saying the TechnicalSystem is Q93#120 - it should be Q93#505. My Q XI has client 120...
    It seems to me that the RFC adapter is kind of confused about the sender..
    I have created a OSS message and SAP has looged on and looked into it with both a XI expert and RFC expert without being able to answer - all is configured correctly.
    - The SLD config. for bus.system Q93 is ok -
    - The bus.system in ID is showing correct vaues for
    Adapter Specific Identifiers (SID Q93, client 505)
    - Both Dev. and Qual. environment are running on XI 3.0 SP 14 latest patch, RFC component version on the SAP side is identical between dev. and qual. SAP systems
    - It doesn't matter which gw I use (Q93 gw or XI gw), the error is persistent
    - It doesn't matter if I increase initial conn, max conn.
    I have also tried to use qRFC instead, but with the same result.
    Anyone using tRFC for asynch. communication from SAP to XI seeing something similar?
    Meanwhile, I will do RFC trace on GW and RFC Adapter on AE....
    Please, do not say SP15, oss msg for FAQ RFC adapter or links to RFCAdapter config....
    best regards
    Torstein

    Hi,
    SAP Note 730870 FAQ: XI 3.0 RfcAdapter Q.no 15
    <i>Q 15: Whats wrong when the error message "lookup of alternativeServiceIdentifier via CPA-cache failed" shows up while sending a RFC call to the RfcAdapter?
    A: A RFC sender channel is located beneath a service within the Integration Directory. Within this service choose "Service" -> "Adapter-Specific Identifiers". The values in the fields "R/3 System ID" and "Client" has to be maintained with the correct values of the system, that sends the RFC call to the RfcAdapter. It normaly only makes sense to have these values filled for services of type "Business System". If maintained in SLD, this fields will be filled automaticaly for services of type "Business System" and can be updated with the button "Compare with System Landscape Directory".</i>
    - Give correct appserver and gateway service details in XI.
    - Open the service holding the RFC adapter you are trying to use. On the top menu, goto Service -> Adapter Specific Identifiers..
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • FB60 screen change layout different between DEV and PRD

    Hi,
    I'm having problem with transaction FB60. When i try to change the layout in PRD, in screen Edit System Setting, some of the field showing 0 length. For example in WBS element field, in DEV show length 24 but PRD show length 0. I try to compare the version but it is same (program & table structure - ACGL_ITEM). When I debug the program, found out that it will get the structure from sap internal c program call 'AB_GET_CX_DATA'. So, maybe this program version are different between DEV and PRD.
    Anybody knows what is the cause of this problem? Or maybe somebody can tell me how to check sap internal c program.
    Thank you very much.

    Yes. FB60 is Enter Vendor Invoice. In this screen you can see a table with column such as GL Acct, Debit/Credit, Amount in DC, Cost Center and others. You can add or remove some of the field using Table Setting and create Screen Variant. My problem is, the length of WBS Element and Profit Center field is 0. How to change the length.
    I already searched in forum but I only found how to create screen variant.
    Thanks.

  • Do any of you experience Im having with my ipad? I can't make a comment in Facebook for older posts and I can't open numerous comments from old posts of my friends. but everything works perfectly when I use laptop. is there problem between apple and FB?

    do any of you experience Im having with my ipad? I can't make a comment in Facebook for older posts and I can't open numerous comments from old posts of my friends. but everything works perfectly when I use my laptop(non-apple). is there problem between apple and FB?

    Facebook apparently has their site coded poorly for tablets with touch screens. Try using the Facebook app. It is not perfect either but it is better than view in a browser lately.

  • Problems between PE4 and 10

    I have a drawing that was resized to a certain length using PE4. I have now upgraded to PE10 and when I print the drawing , it prints 3-4 times  larger than what it should be. When I view the drawing, the ruler at the top of the screen shows it being the correct length and when I checked the deminsion in the resize box, it also has the correct length. Have I done something wrong or should I delete the drawing and start over from scratch?

    Could you be a little more specific please? Sorry, I am not a tech guy just a poor laymen.
    Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 20:30:55 -0600
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Problems between PE4 and 10
        Re: Problems between PE4 and 10
        created by photodrawken in Photoshop Elements - View the full discussion
    Check your PSE print settings, especially the DPI value in the "Print Quality". Ken
         Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4595437#4595437
         To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4595437#4595437. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
         Start a new discussion in Photoshop Elements by email or at Adobe Forums
      For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • Consistency between dev and prod systems!!!!

    Hi All,
    I wuld like to check the consistency between Dev and Prod systems for all the Data model and other objects existing. I would like to do this sanity check to see whether the two systems are in sync. Are there any tools or transaction codes within SAP framework which can guide me in this direction.
    Kind Regards,
    Surya Tamada.

    Hi Surya ,
    First build whole data flow :
    1 .Create Infoarea ,Infoobjects & Masterdata ,Infoproviders ,Infoobject Catelog under Infoarea,MetaData - Characteristics MeteData - Key Figures 
    2 DSOs  ,Infocubes ,Infosets, Multiproviders ,Views in the development system ,Datasources for BW system,Flat File Datasources,Transformations
    then get data from the se11 tables as per your requirement :
    like RSDVCHA ,RSDBCHATR,RSDCUBEIOBJ,RSDICMULTIIOBJ etc and built view on it  as per your requirement .
    then built flat file data sources and transformation .
    get all data downloaded to flat file in ur PC .In the same way from other system.
    make flow from PC File Datasource -> DSO -> Infocube and build queries for different objects .load the downloaded files to them and then run query .
    ex : query to compare cube will take cube name and systems name as input and compare objects .
    Regards,
    Jaya

  • How can I fix a problem between Firefox and my printer? When I try to print a window appears Save as ,then another saying Firefox not responding and printing does not work

    I used to be able to print correctly using Firefox as my browser,but something changed in the last month or so,possibly after a Firefox update. I`m not really sure how it happened but there seems to be a problem between Firefox and my printer. So I have been using Internet Explorer as my default so I can print. I would prefer to use Firefox again since that is where my bookmarks are. Is there a way to get the connection between Firefox and my printer back?

    '''Save as''' = sounds like you don't have your printer selected, or you have ''Print to file'' selected
    http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problems_printing_web_pages

  • Inconsistencies between DEV and QAS query output

    Hi all -
    I am currently using a BI query in my VC model that I send the output to a table in VC, note that I am showing only a few fields from the output.  This works for some tables in my model that use another query.
    The problem is that when I change the alias (using the Alias Manager tool) from BI DEV to QAS, then deploy, the number of columns is changing in my table and seems to give me all of the potential query output and not only the fields I have selected in my model.
    To make a test, I have tried to hide the output fields in the BI query itself, and this seems to have a direct effect on the shown columns in VC but creates some other unwanted problem.  In fact, it works for the other query...
    Anyone had the same problem?  could that be a refreshing problem?
    Thank you,
    Claude.

    Hi
    It could be a refresh problem. Try to change the RFC from the query definition & refrech the 'Data service'. Then test the output of the query from 'Test Query' then save & deploy. Also in Columns try with the charachters where type is 'Text'.
    Regards
    Sandeep

  • Communication problem between NetBeans and Tomcat

    hi!
    i got a quite mysterious problem. here is what happens:
    - i start NetBeans 5.5.1 (the first time)
    - i want to debug my JSF-Project, the Debugger starts
    - After a few seconds the debugger waits for tomcat (it sais: "Waiting for Tomcat...") and tomcat starts
    - Again after a few seconds the tomcat-debugger-output sais "Tomcat startet in 3333 ms".
    okay.
    when i enter http://localhost:8084/ in my browser i get the tomcat homepage, so the server has definitely started! But nothing happens in NetBeans and nothing happens with my project....
    In the lower-right corner i see this blue working-bar that sais "deploying project" but nothing happens. The Project-Debugger-Output still sais "Waiting for Tomcat..." but nothing happens...
    And after something around 3 minutes (i guess it's a timeout) i get the error "Starting of Tomcat failed." But is HAS started, i can login to the Administration-Area in my browser!
    so i guess there is a communication problem between netbeans an tomcat. Netbeans waits for a message from tomcat but tomcat doesn't send it..or netbeans doesn't understand it.
    But the story goes on:
    When i press the debug-button a second time it takes only a few seconds till i get the message: "Tomcat server port 8084 already in use". OF COURSE! Because Tomcat has already startet and can't be stoped by NetBeans.
    i'm trying to solve this problem for 4 days now, so i would be very happy if anyone has an idea where to start/continue the search...
    thanks,
    flo.
    some system-info:
    - windows vista business 32-bit
    - no firewall is running
    - AntiVir Personal Edition IS running
    - Yahoo Widgets Engine IS running
    - no other software is running
    and finally the tomcat-log:
    Using CATALINA_BASE: C:\Users\Administrator\.netbeans\5.5.1\apache-tomcat-5.5.17_base
    Using CATALINA_HOME: C:\Program Files\NetBeans\enterprise3\apache-tomcat-5.5.17
    Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: C:\Users\Administrator\.netbeans\5.5.1\apache-tomcat-5.5.17_base\temp
    Using JRE_HOME: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_12
    Listening for transport dt_shmem at address: tomcat_shared_memory_id
    21.09.2007 18:27:50 org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener lifecycleEvent
    INFO: The Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_12\bin;.;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Program Files\QuickTime\QTSystem\;C:\Program Files\ThinkPad\ConnectUtilities;C:\Program Files\Common Files\Teleca Shared;C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\AGL;C:\Program Files\MySQL\MySQL Server 5.0\bin;C:\Program Files\cvsnt;
    21.09.2007 18:27:50 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol init
    INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8084
    21.09.2007 18:27:50 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load
    INFO: Initialization processed in 1862 ms
    21.09.2007 18:27:50 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start
    INFO: Starting service Catalina
    21.09.2007 18:27:50 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
    INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.5.17
    21.09.2007 18:27:50 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost start
    INFO: XML validation disabled
    21.09.2007 18:27:53 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol start
    INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8084
    21.09.2007 18:27:54 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
    INFO: JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009
    21.09.2007 18:27:54 org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start
    INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/31 config=null
    21.09.2007 18:27:54 org.apache.catalina.storeconfig.StoreLoader load
    INFO: Find registry server-registry.xml at classpath resource
    21.09.2007 18:27:54 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
    INFO: Server startup in 3626 ms

    As i wrote before, the same problem occured for me. I have found a solution which is : Go to tools menu and then select options . In the proxy info, select No Proxy.
    I hope this help you

  • Problems between Xcelsius and WebDynpro for Java

    How should I do to show Xcelsius in WebDynpro for Java?
    How should I transport data between Xcelsius and WebDynpro?
    How should I control WebDynpro with Xcelsius?For example,firing plugs in Xcelsius like in WebDynpro to change one view to another.
    How should I do to execute a Java method in Xcelsius?For example,scheduling a job on clicking a button in Xcelsius.
    Besides these,I also want to know the same problems between other BOE contents and WebDynpro for Java.
    Regards,
    Abe

    Hi Pradeep:
    Well that purely depends on the business application (project) your client is proposing. Following are very few factors which will drive for creating web-based applications:
    VC: it's a UI modeling tool (non-programming) for creating rapid creation of web-based applications.
    WD: its a powered by Java and ABAP with which you can create robust business applications.
    If your client is very choosy about rapid application development, reporting, rich user interface, to reduce TCO then VC is the choice. Or if the project contains typical integration with SAP and non-SAP systems, complex business logic development, integration with WCM systems...etc then WDJ is the option.
    If you’ve some sort of custom development with facilitating the Development Infrastructure (NWDI) then WDJ is the only option I could say.
    We hope with NW CE 7.1.1(referred by Priyanka Singh) tighter integration between these TWO tools may over come the ambiguity of using them.
    Tnx,
    MS

  • DataSource / Structures mismatched between Dev and Test Systems. ..!!

    Hi,
    We are doing a scenario. Where XI will update the data into PSA through ABAP proxy.
    Scenario worked perfectly in development system.
    We transported the objects from Dev to test. The Strucures are mismatched in SE11 between development and Test systems as below.
    Data sources (ZDS_RECIHDR and ZDS_RECTPALL) looks ok. But when I saw the structures in SE11 they are not correct, they got mismatched.
    Development:
    /BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
    /BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
    Test:
    /BIC/CQZDS_REC00001000 - Allocation (ZDS_RECTPALL)
    /BIC/CQZDS_REC00003000 - Header (ZDS_RECIHDR)
    Kindly let me know where it might have gone wrong?
    Thanks
    Deepthi

    We done it already. Still it is failing.
    While transporting, it is failing and showing the error as
    Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_ALLOCATION1=CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
    The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZSALENUM', but there is a component called
    Program ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CP, Include ZPI_CL_IA_PAYMENT_HEADER======CM001: Syntax error in line 000016
    The data object 'L_S_DATA' has no component called'/BIC/ZTRANDATE', but there are the following com
    The Structure is mismatched in SE11 between header and allocation structures. That is the reason it is failing.
    Any more ideas pls?

  • Color problems between Lr5 and other software

    I can not see where to make adjustments to get the same tones between Lr and my other software: Photoshop, Irfanview, Windows Viewer ...
    My test conditions:
    My monitor is calibrated
    ... - Export Lr Jpeg quality 85% and also tests 16bit TIFF (sRGB, Adobe rgb and prophoto)
    ... - When exporting, I checked the "add to catalog" to view the same image in Lr.
    Conclusion: Other software gives almost the same tones (some small differences due to the chosen color space) and Lr gives a much warmer picture (Raw or treated Jgeg reimported in the catalog). Will it have a preference of Lr to settle?
    Note: the direct opening of RAW file in Photoshop with Camera Raw (same engine as Lr) without special settings, also gives a duller color different image, that directly Lr.
    What is the solution?

    In general, any difference between Lightroom and other color managed software is indicative of a corrupt monitor profile. No idea about Irfanview, but Lightroom, Photoshop and Windows Photo Viewer should all display identically.
    What they all do is convert from the source/document color space to the target color space, which for display is your monitor profile. The result should be identical - that is in fact the whole point of color management. But since the source space may be different the actual conversion itself may also be different. So one conversion may go bad but not others.
    A difference between Library and Develop will have the same explanation (different source spaces; Library is Adobe RGB while Develop is linear ProPhoto).
    It also happens that different applications react differently to a bad monitor profile. It may work in one application and fail in others.
    Any software that is not color managed will simply display in the native monitor color space, which can be anything under the sun, so you can just ignore and disregard that. It won't be accurate anyway.
    So the solution is to have a valid and healthy monitor profile. Then everything color managed will display identically (save for gamut differences, but in practice that only applies if you have a wide gamut monitor. With a standard monitor any source space will have equal or larger gamut than the monitor).
    Some calibration software has been known to not follow specifications strictly at all times, so check for updated software. Or the profile can simply have become corrupt. It happens. A way to test this is to set sRGB as default monitor profile in the OS - or Adobe RGB if you have a wide gamut monitor - and see if the problem clears.

Maybe you are looking for