Problem in delvery cost

hi
i made a PO with freight A/c and freight charges is given to another vendor bt at the time of MIRO when i am using layout only delivery charge its coming blank and the whole amount is taken in single A/c no freight A/c why so pls help

You can check the account key for freight in M/08 for the pricing you are using in PO, Open the pricing procedure & check the account key in front of the freight condition, once you get Account key, then check the G/L assignment in OBYC for that particular Account key.

Similar Messages

Problems after transfering Cost centers with LSMW

Hi,
I have a problem after transfering Cost Centers with LSMW.
The first Batch input run created all cost centers in one CC Group erroneously - cause they should be placed in different CC groups.
I changed LSMW settings and made another batch input run - now the Cost centers were created in proper groups. I think that I deleted all CC's created in previous batch input run, but now I am not too sure, because there is a problem...
Cost centers exist both in their proper groups and in the one group mentioned by me before. So there is such situation that Cost center appears in Standar hierarchy twice at the same time.
When I delete cost centers - they are removed from their proper groups but the CC entry remains in that one group - all CC are there inactive.
How can I get rid of them. I tried deleting them - but it's impossible - the system doesn't see them.
When I run the batch input again - the same cost centers appear in proper groups and at the same time they become active in the one group. The standard hierarchy group is not UNIQE.
Please advice me how to delete these entries from standard hierachy.
Best wishes,
Karol

Hi,
Always recommended before loading into live system: upload in test system and check. check again just to make sure all is correct before real load.
In your case you probably would have been best to do a group change after incorrect upload.
Do Ambiguity check in stadnard hierarchy to explore all incorrect entries. Depending on your version yo ucan change in that function (ECC6) ore need to run a report. Before running the report check that CC master records have correct entry. The report is RKCORRH1
Again, try in QA first and run in Test Run
Good luck
Hein

JDE worldsoft 9.1 Facing the problem of extending cost is calculating wrong

IN JDE worldsoft 9.1 we are facing the problem of extending cost is calculating wrongly.
at the time of shipment confirmation in table F42119 it is calculated with 100 that means with decimals if the extended cost i( Qunatity 1 * cost 100 = Extended cost should be100 but here it is showing 10000 )
Can any one help on this.

If I understand your problem correctly I would suggest looking into Sar# 8948245.
Nichelle

Can 119 phantom asslys at one bom level create problem in product costing

I am going through a scenario where there r 119 phantom assemlies at one bom level. Can this create problem in product costing? It has been told to me by somebody that there can not be more than 99 phantom asslys at one level of bom? Is that true? My problem is that when i am doing product costing it is showing error-" too many dummies at bom level". Is this related to no. of phantom asslys at one bom level?

HI bala,
all the materials are costing relevent. I thik this problem is releteted with no. of phantom assemlies allowed at one bom level.
I had 119 phantom assemlies at bom level 3 of a varient material. At that time it gives me abap runtime error during product costing.
Now I have removed special procurment key 50 from material master of 20 number of phantom asslys. so now there r now 99 phantom assemlies at bom level 3.
I have taken costing run and its not giving error.
so i reached to conclusion that statndard limit of no. of phantom assemlies at one bom level can not exeed 99.
Now customer requires 119 phantom assleys at this level 3 of bom.
So can u suggest me whether i should contact sap to increase this limit for this perticular case?
will they solve my problem or there is any other solution to this?
please reply.
nitin

Import purchase - problem with delivery costs

Hi guys,
In case of import purchase, we are normally giving 3 to 4 types of delivery costs (like freight,agency charges etc). If there is no transaction done against the PO, we are able to either change or add new delivery cost to the Purchase Order. But if we try to make changes or add one more condition type (related to delivery cost), after preparing inbound delivery/goods receipt against the PO, it is not allowing. Do we need to make any configuratin changes for this to happen.
Please suggest us the way out for this problem.
Thanks in advance,
Chintu

Hi ,
No , you won't be able to make any changes specially to the said condition .
Any adjustment u can done in MIRO document .
Thanks
Dipak

Problems with item cost & batch table

Hi experts,
I have developed a crystal report recently, to retrieve all the data from batch table (OIBT) and present it in a report.
Valuation method: moving average
Begin:
Item ABC
              (batchnum)A1 blah   (qty)3   (itemcost)10.00 (whs)01
              (batchnum)A2 blah   (qty)4   (itemcost)12.00 (whs)01
tables involved OITM(retrieve info), OIBT(retrieve info), OITW(retrieve item cost)
Everything was fine until the problem(step) below occurred:
In my query, I already included a condition whereby BatchQuantity must be greater than 0, OITW.OnHand must be greater than 0
Then, I created a Inventory Transfer document to move A1(full quantity) from Whs 01 to Whs 02.
I opened up my crystal report, the result shown as following:
Item ABC
              (batchnum)A1 blah   (qty)3   (itemcost)10.00 (whs)01
              (batchnum)A1 blah   (qty)3   (itemcost)10.00 (whs)02
              (batchnum)A2 blah   (qty)4   (itemcost)12.00 (whs)01
How to solve the above issue?Please advice. Thank you.

Hi Tou,
Check your query warehouse are linked in your query
Batch quantity greater than Zero means it consider the IN, OUT batch transactions.
Regards
Jambulingam.P

Problems with Personnel Cost Planning

Hi all,
i have problems with the Personnel Cost Planning specifically with the Quota planning (infotype 1019).
i save data in the infotype 1019, Quota planning, for a organizational unit and in the infotype 1005, Planned Compensation, i save data for a job (i also tried with positions), but i can't value the cost for the organizational unit.
maybe I'm missing some setting or I'm doing something wrong.
Thanks

Joanne,
Are you still having issues with BI-IP? I have been troubleshooting with the basis folks in getting BI-IP up on a new system over the last few day to a week and have now gone through the process myself whereas before I had been given a system already set up. I have enclosed some troubleshooting feedback with my counterpart in getting the system up.
What type of issue are you having?
Can the basis folks start the planning modeler or planning wizard in RSPLAN even if you can't?
1. The note mentioned above 919850 and the help documentation in SPRO under
SAP NETWEAVER->Business Intelligence->BI Integrated Planning
are very helpful. They have to set the following Jco Destinations in Web Dynpro Content Administrator:
BI_MODELDATA
BI_METADATA
WD_ALV_MODELDATA_DEST
WD_ALV_METADATA_DEST
And the problem was the connection to the message server. It was not possible to connect without having a Logon group assigned. This had to be done in WI4 ABAP as well as in the SLD for this system. After that assignment connection was no problem.
2. make sure you have the portal ips in your host file.
3. have they have created an account for you in client 001 of the NW04S?
4. Have they created a portal id for you and assign the portal role com.sap.ip.bi.business_planning_showcase to you?
5. have they configured the setting for starting the planning modeler (also under SPRO)..
Hope this helps. If you have more specific questions, feel free to e-mail me directly.
Mary

Problem in Standard Costing Run

Hi Experts,
   As per our client requirement we marked price control "S" for all materials. While running the Std costing, system is showing the Cost components as below
Direct Material 13.29$
Material Overheads   1.92$
Direct Labor   68.19$
Labor Overheads 79.78$
The Material overhead percentage rate is 16.9%.
Now the problem is with the Material cost 13.29$. In this cost the Material overhead cost also included. So please suggest what i need to change in the config part to get this component (Direct Material) without material overhead.
As per our requirement the values should be shown as below
Direct Material 11.37$
Material Overheads   1.92$
Direct Labor   68.19$
Labor Overheads 79.78$
Thanks&Regards,
Raja lucky.

Hi Rau Moder,
    We have created the cost component Material overhead seperately and assigned respective cost element to this component.
For the component Direct Material we assigned only consumption accounts not material overhead cost element.
Thanks&Regards,
Raja lucky.

Problem while creating cost centre

hi all ,
I am trying to create cost centre in t.code ks01 but the error message comes
''controlling area vi01 does not have a standard hierarchy(please assign one)'. but i
i try to assign standard hirarchy in t.code okkp again the error message comes like 'hierarchy name xxx_cost does not exist.' what is the exact problem
pls clarify it
chandra

You please try by giving simple name like VI01 instead of what you have given, i think the field length should be restricting.
Please try the above and see its working or not
best regards
Message was edited by:
Emani

Ambiguity problem in a cost center hierarchy

Hello,
I have a problem with duplicated values in a cost center hierarchy.
There is a cost center that appears in two different groups and I am not able to delete none of them
It appears an ambiguity problem because of this, how could I solve it?

Hi
In KSH2   select the   cost center and then click on   REMOVE. But this will not work for a std hierarchy as explained below.   SO   THE SOLUTION IS TO DELETE THE COST CENTER MASTER DATA AND THEN   RE ASSIGN IT IN ' KSH2'
1)   The REMOVE function contradicts the fact that each master data must
always be assigned to one node in the standard hierarchy.
2)   The DELETION of objects requires time-consuming checks of master data,
especially if entire subtrees are to be deleted. Therefore it is not
supported here.
If such a case arises you should delete the master data
using master data maintenance.
Thanks
kamala

Problem with a cost element

dear all,
a cost element was created from a society x in ca y.
now this cost element creats some problem for society d and b in ca Y.
some regiastration are made on this cost element so I know that I can delete it until 31.12.2010.
what kind of solution can I have? we don't want tha the registrations made on this account are relevant for controlling.
this is a cost element of type 11.
If I create a cdc Dummy and I imput it every time that I made registration on this account what kind of impact I will have in controlling?
i read that I have to block th account 206131 and create new in copy of it. What kind of impact I will Have?
please help me to solve this issue because we have the ragistration blocked at the moment.
thanks
V.

why you don't suggest me to use this program?
the entries on my cost element are made with tc VL01N..
until 31 of july this kind of registration creates a document FI and a document Profit center.
after the creation of the cost element this kind of registration creates a Fi document, profit center document and a CO document.
I don't want the creation of CO document.
Actually in COEP I have 24 input. I try to simulate the same case in test client.
I create the cost element, I do the same registration, and I have 3 type of document.
then I run the program RKACOR20.
at the end I have only 2 documents: FI and profit centre. (the same situation that I had in july)
then I run tc KA04 and I can delete the cost element.
you think that it is so dangerous to do in production system?
what kind of problem this program can creates to me?
thanks a lot
V.

Early confirmation of activity - Problem with actual cost updating

Hi Guys...
I have trying to find out solution with trail and error basis but.....
The issue is :
Network activity - Planned duration 100hrs
periodic confirmation taken place .... no problem... actual cost also updated accordinly,
at one point of time, realised that activity is completed with 70hrs effort only.
then I have updated 100% completion.
what is the twist here is:
though I have completed 100% of work with 70% of actual hours, however, system display actual costs equals to 100hrs.
I can not reduce planned hours equal to actual hours. at the same, I would like to see my activitiy completed with 70 hrs and actual cost equal to 70hrs of effort only.
is there any enhancement there so that we can have both display planned 100 hrs and actual as 70 hrs.
and costs also.
Looking forward to hear from the gurus and thanks in advance
Shal award points for appropriate answer.
Regards,
PSR

Hi,
One probable solution would be using User status which will block additional confirmations. At the point when you know that work is completed within planned hours, set this user status so that no more confirmation is possible, at th same time user will come to know that activity is completed.
Hope this helps.
Regards

Problem in direct costs distribution

Hello everyone,
We have 23 specific direct costs (LineItems), and we want that the whole cost of each one goes to a different parent activity. Once the parent has received the cost, we want to distribute it equally between all is children.
The problem is that when we are creating a resource driver, the resource driver split cannot see LineItem dimension, so we cannot find those costs.
We have thought three possible solutions:
a) Create 23 Cost Centers (one cost center for each LineItem). With this solution the resource driver split could distribute the cost of each LineItem into the corresponding activity.
b) Create 23 resource drivers, where each driver distributes only a LineItem into the activity.
c) Create 23 "dummy" activities, and make the reassigments.
We think option 1 is the most efficient. What do you think? Or does exist another solution for that problem?
Please see the attached document.
Thanks in advance
best regards
Sergi

You'd probably be better heading over to the iPhone developer forums.
Cheers.
N.

Problem with the cost centre budget is being copied to profit centres 1KE0

Hi Experts
I am trying to cost centre budget is being copied to profit centres using transaction code 1KE0. The log displays all entries were successful but does not update the table and i did run foreground and backgound.can any one help me.

sloved

Problem in Standard Costing

Dear Friends,
When i am running standard cost estimate, indirect overheads are calculated from KP26.
Suppose i have maintained the Machine Cost Rate at Rs. 60 for 1 Hour. When i run the standard cost estimate for that material, it is calculated by Rs. 30 per hour. For each and every cost, it is calculating half of the price maintained.
Please help me in this regards.
Regards,
Jimmy

Hi Mangalraj,
Thank you very much for your reply. I found all the things fine.
I found one new point by my due analysis. The points is,
I have maintained activity rates in advance till June 2009. its is as follow.
Jan - 60 Per Hour
Feb - 60 Per Hour
Mar - 60 Per Hour
Apr - 60 Per Hour
May - 60 Per Hour
Jun - 60 Per Hour
Now, the system calculates the indirect OH at the rate of Rs. 30 per hour ( i.e Rs. 360 for 6 months. Now the system calculates the OH rate at Rs. 30 per hour, which is derived by Rs. 360/12 months)
Why the system is behaving like this? it takes the average of 12 months in all cases. I tried by changing the distribution key also but it does not work.
What would be the reason behind it?
I hope to get back you soon friend.
Regards,
Jimmy

Problem in delvery cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for