Import purchase - problem with delivery costs

Hi guys,
In case of import purchase, we are normally giving 3 to 4 types of delivery costs (like freight,agency charges etc). If there is no transaction done against the PO, we are able to either change or add new delivery cost to the Purchase Order. But if we try to make changes or add one more condition type (related to delivery cost), after preparing inbound delivery/goods receipt against the PO, it is not allowing. Do we need to make any configuratin changes for this to happen.
Please suggest us the way out for this problem.
Thanks in advance,
Chintu

Hi ,
No , you won't be able to make any changes specially to the said condition .
Any adjustment u can done in MIRO document .
Thanks
Dipak

Similar Messages

Subcontracting Purchase Order with Delivery Cost

Hello Experts,
I am facing issue during Goods Receipt against Subcontracting Purchase Order.
Note:
a) Subcontracting PO has delivery cost given 200 /pc.
b) Condition type Z001 for Delivery has Condition Category "B" with accrual checked.
c) Pricing Procedure has Accrual Key FR1 with condition type Z001
d) Condition Z001 is common for Standard Item Category PO and Subcontracting PO for delivery cost.
During Goods receipt, system generates following accounting.
BSX     Inventory-SemiFinish     M     S     521.12
WRX     GRIR Clrg-Mat A/c     S     H     100.00-
BSV     Inc/Dec. in Semi-F     S     H     521.12-
FRL     Job Work                          S     S     100
FRN     Freight Clearing A/c     S     S     100
FR1     Freight Clearing A/c     S     H     100.00-
BSX     Inventory-RM(Domest)     M     H     321.12-
GBB     RM Consumed-Domestic     S     S     321.12
As shown above FRN is the account which is the resultant of Devliery cost during Subcontracting. Entry of this Key is not completely knocked off in this transaction and next transaction for invoice verification MIRO.
My query:
A) Can we stop account posting for FRN.
B) If not How will FRN entry be knocked off, (Entry for FR1 gets set off during MIRO- Invoice verification.)
C) In case B is not possible, Posting in account assigned to FRN Key will always show values.
Can any one help me to confirm that Entries above during Goods Receipt are ok, If not what sort of changes are required.
Can we use same condition types for Delivery cost for Standard Item category PO and Subcontracting PO .
Awaiting reply,
Regards,
Manish

Hi Vaibhav,
a) I am not able to understand why do you think the above entries are not correct.The entries are perfect.
My Reply: Ok I do agree for a movement that entries are ok, No Issues
b) If you want that freight entries should not go to separate account then you can include the freight charges in the same condition as basic price condition so that charges will go to FRL and WRX.
My Reply: How can I include Freight Charges in the same condition as basic price condition, so that charges will to go FRL & WRX, Can you please explore this,
Regards
Manish

Problem with Delivery IDOC staus 51

Hi all,
I have problem with Delivery IDOC.
An IDOC is sent from the logistics provider with reference to a manually created delivery, which creates another IDOC & another partial delivery.
The second IDOC created then confirms the partial delivery created by the first IDOC.
When IDOC try to confirm this delivery, it goes to status 51 with error " Delivery does not exist".
In some case IDOC was correctly processed & confirmed the delivery.
In some cases it went wrong.
Any ideas regarding this?

Hi Suneel,
It seems there is timing issue between the first IDoc and second IDoc.
When the first IDoc has not yet commit to DB then the second IDoc tries to process with reference to the first IDoc.
Is there any that can distinguish between 1st and 2nd IDocs?
In other word, can you post the second IDoc within minutes delay?
Just my two cents.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Free of charge return with delivery cost

We have the issue that we want to send material back to vendor free of charge, but there are some delivery costs that need to post to expense account. So I created PO where one line is with 0 value with this material. But how to enter the delivery cost as those fields are not active when the value is 0?

hi..
you can create two line items in that for first line item u define the material and check the retrun check box and in the second line item u can assign cost center in which u can adjust delivery cost..
Hope it works.
Thanks.

Import Manager - Problem with 0..n field in Import Manager

Iu2019m having problems with XMLs that contain multiple or single tags in MDIS process. For example: I did the map using a XML with multiple tags for Address:
<address>
<item>
u2026
</item>
<item>
u2026
</item>
</address>
When I send two address or more Address, the Import Server work fine, but when I send only one Address, the address is not imported.
<address>
<item>
</item>
<item>
</item>
</address>
Opening the xml file with only one Address in Import Manager, I saw that the fields isnu2019t mapped, but when I open a xml file with multiple Address itu2019s open correctly.
The XSD cardinality for the Address\Item is 0..n

Hi Evandro ,
If it is processing the input file correctly through the Manul Import manager process then update your latest Map by using SAVE As option or else save this correct map with a new name altogether and use this new map in the port for automatic importing.
If your file is able to process correctly through the Import manager without showing any errors till the Import step in the Import manager then this map must be correct and shoul automate the importing correctly.
Provided you are using the similar file for automatic importing as well.The file name and the fields as well as the value mapping as saved in this corrected map must not differ with the input file else this saved map will not be able to import correctly.
Check to see if you have made correct setting for automatic importing by refering the below link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/43/12036df94c3e92e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm (Automatic importing MDIS - Import manager ref guide>MDM import server(MDIS)>MDIS Consfiguration)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8973bcaf-0801-0010-b7a7-f6af6b1df00e(mdm import and syndication server)
Also check the exception folders if your import is not taking place automatically:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/43/12036df94c3e92e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm (Exceptions- MDM Import Manager MDIS-Exception handling)
Hope It Helped
Thanks & Regards
Simona Pinto

Problems with Personnel Cost Planning

Hi all,
i have problems with the Personnel Cost Planning specifically with the Quota planning (infotype 1019).
i save data in the infotype 1019, Quota planning, for a organizational unit and in the infotype 1005, Planned Compensation, i save data for a job (i also tried with positions), but i can't value the cost for the organizational unit.
maybe I'm missing some setting or I'm doing something wrong.
Thanks

Joanne,
Are you still having issues with BI-IP? I have been troubleshooting with the basis folks in getting BI-IP up on a new system over the last few day to a week and have now gone through the process myself whereas before I had been given a system already set up. I have enclosed some troubleshooting feedback with my counterpart in getting the system up.
What type of issue are you having?
Can the basis folks start the planning modeler or planning wizard in RSPLAN even if you can't?
1. The note mentioned above 919850 and the help documentation in SPRO under
SAP NETWEAVER->Business Intelligence->BI Integrated Planning
are very helpful. They have to set the following Jco Destinations in Web Dynpro Content Administrator:
BI_MODELDATA
BI_METADATA
WD_ALV_MODELDATA_DEST
WD_ALV_METADATA_DEST
And the problem was the connection to the message server. It was not possible to connect without having a Logon group assigned. This had to be done in WI4 ABAP as well as in the SLD for this system. After that assignment connection was no problem.
2. make sure you have the portal ips in your host file.
3. have they have created an account for you in client 001 of the NW04S?
4. Have they created a portal id for you and assign the portal role com.sap.ip.bi.business_planning_showcase to you?
5. have they configured the setting for starting the planning modeler (also under SPRO)..
Hope this helps. If you have more specific questions, feel free to e-mail me directly.
Mary

Import table - problems with date

Hi,
I want to import an table from text file with date column. The format in file is 12.01.2000 13:59:12.
When importing the preview of column value is 2000-12-01 13:59:12. I've then added the format YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS. After import all rows with date of year 1999 or below are failed.
Does anybody know why and how can I solve this problem?
Thanks
chrissy

Hi Dimitri,
yes all rows with date of year 2000 or higher are correct. It shows me the YYYY-DD-MM HH24:MI format if it recognizes the column as date. Somehow I get it worked that it is recognized as varchar, changed to date and set format to DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI. So it was imported fine.
Thanks for your help,
chrissy

Controlled test shows imovie 08 import is problem with image quality

Friends,
Like many others I thought that I had noticed a quality difference between imovie 08 and imovie 06. So I did a controlled test:
I imported the same video into imovie 08 and imovie 06. I made two separate movies out of the video in 08 and two separate movies out of the video in 06. I then exported one of the 06 movies into 08 and one of the 08 movies into 06. I then burned all four movies to dvd.
The resulting burns were the following:
1. imported into 06, burned through 06
2. imported into 06, exported to 08 and burned through 08
3. imported into 08 and burned through 08
4. imported into 08, exported to 06 and burned through 06.
The result:
The movies imported into 06 were clearly superior in image quality to those imported into 08. I couldn't tell a difference between the 06 imports burned through 08 and 06. I also couldn't detect a difference between movies imported into 08 and burned in 06 and 08.
What is it about 08 import that causes quality degradation? I couldn't find any quality preferences to change.
I suppose this post isn't much different from the others along this line but I couldn't find any that did this type of controlled test.
Applecare had no idea why there was this difference.
Steve

I think I've solved my problem with a Google Search. I came across a free slide show generator
(contributions requested) that shows much higher quality slide shows than either iPhoto or Aperture 3.
You click on a folder of jpegs and it almost immediately generates thumbnails and within a few seconds
I can be viewing a full screen, tack sharp, slideshow of all of the files in the folder. Much sharper than
I'm used to seeing.
I think I'll keep the Aperture 3 and use if for the purpose it's intended for in the future. I'll also redo the
image preview files to the small size it started with and then I'll copy all of the files I'm interested in from
iPhoto into a separate folder on another disk. I'll use Aperture to catalog and to perform image manipulations
on but I won't try to use it as an iPhoto replacement. I don't think I'll be using iPhoto much as an image
viewer in the future either after I finish moving my favorite pictures to the Phoenix Slides folder.
The name of the free program is Phoenix Slides. It's free to download and try, free to keep (though I
think you'd want to pay the small amount requested) and fast. My pictures have never looked so good
before.
http://blyt.net/phxslides/
Message was edited by: Jimbo2001

Bid comparisson with delivery costs

Hi there!
IHow can we do to have in the bid comparisson not only the price provided by the vendor for the negotiated incoterm, but also the planned delivery costs related?
For example, I have two bids, one overseas and another one local.
How to compare the freight costs that are not part of the bid provided by the overseas vendor because he is bidding FOB.
Thanks
Ezequiel

Can anybody please try to answer this please?
Thanks in advance..
Subbu.

Problem with Delivery Type Determination in Purchase Order

Dear All,
We are working on a IS-Retail Scenario where we are dealing with generic articles. While creating a PO, we have encountered an error which says:"Also specify a delivery type in case of shipping data relevance". The error message number is MEPO 099. We have checked that Delivery type NL is attached to the document type under the supplying site customizing, and supplying site is attached to the receiving site with the correct document type. Can anybody throw some light on what we might be missing out in this scenario?
Thanks and Sincere Regards,
Amitabha

Hi
I suppose you are creating a retuns PO ,
Please maintain the customizing of the same in SPRO-> MM -> Purchasing-> Purchase Order-> Returns Order-> Store Return / Return Plant to Plant
here you need to maintain the delivery type for returns.
This message is trigerred only in case of Returns order
In SAP Retail, plants are referred to as distribution centers or stores. With store returns, you can map the return delivery of goods from
a store to a distribution center (this is the most common case),
from one distribution center to another distribution center,
from one store to another store,
from a distribution center to a store (although this is not very common).
Requirements
For the return delivery types, you have to make settings for the item category determination.
Partner schema must be assigned to the return delivery types.
The relevant goods movement types must be assigned to the schedule line categories (for the returns in Sales). The following schedule line categories are also available in the system:
NR - Replenishment Returns and
NS - Replenishment Cross Company Returns
Activities
Assign the required return delivery type to
purchasing document category F (purchase order),
purchasing document type (NB - standard purchase order, UB - stock transport order),
the supplying plant (the one to which the goods are being returned)
The following return delivery types are available in the system:
NLR - intra-company-code store returns (purchasing document type UB for replenishment and return orders, delivery type NL for the replenishment delivery)
NCR - cross-company-code store returns (purchasing document type NB for replenishment and return orders, delivery type NLCC for the replenishment delivery)
Please maintain the required customizing
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Scheduling problem with delivery date in purch.req and requirement date

Dear all,
I have the problem, that the calculated delivery date in the purchase requisition does not correspond with the requiement date of the production or planned order.
I would like to use planned delivery times in the material master.
Example:
Planned delivery time: 20 days
Todays date 01.10
Case 1)
Requiement date of planned order 10.10
Case 2)
Requiement date of planned order 20.09
This situation can happen in our envirnoment, as the engineering process still continues after start of production. In this case I would like to have the following result:
Case 1)
Delivery date is 10.10 minus the goods receipt time
Case 2)
Delivery date is day of MRP or one or two days more
I made the setting that dates in the past are not allowed. This solves my first smal problem. I tried to set the scheduling margin key but these settings do not help me, as they are relevant for all materials. I need of course individual planned delivery dates per material.
So, I want to change the standart MRP procedure that in the case of the "wished requirement date" not the calculated date is beeing taken, but the "wished date". Usually you receive an exeption for this case and you would need t solve this manually. But this we dont want to do.
Can s.o. please help me? Thank you all very much, I really dont know what to do in this case.
With best regards,
Bjoern

The question cannot be answerd by SAP standart as I see. We will go through a workaround.

Converting Multipule Reqs to a Purchase Order with Delivery Schedule Lines

Is it possible to convert a multiple Purchase Reqs for the same items to a PO that has one line but multipule deliver dates in the Schedule lines - Where the Purchase Reqs have been generated by MRP
Example
I have an SAP Contract 46***** that runs via MRP and creates 3 Reqs for item number 12345. All from the same vendor
             Req 1 delivery date 2/4/10 QTY 50
             Req 2 delivery date 6/4/10 QTY 20
             Req 3 delivery date 10/4/10 QTY 30
Aim is to have 1 PO with line 1 having a QTY 100 but the Delivery Schedule Tab to show the three seperate delivery needs
            date 2/4/10 QTY 50
            date 6/4/10 QTY 20
            date 10/4/10 QTY 30
Any Help?

When i try that the QTY in line one does not alwasy update to the total qty of the reqs and infact the qty on the req doesnt always appear in the schedule line....
This works for me perfect, I never encountred that the item quantity was not updated if I added a new requisition to the schedule.
ME59N should work, do not select per requistion and per delviery date in the New PO section in the selection screen. But set a flag into box create schedules.

Problem with Delivery due list VL10b for STO's - Orders not disappearing

Hi
We have a problem where some 'Stock Transfer orders' are not disappearing from the delivery due list VL10b
Collective processing of documents due for delivery - Purchase orders
hence we have had two deliveries created for one STO order, which in turn has been goods receipted
Any ideas on what the cause of this problem could be ?
The quantities have not been changed on the STO
Please help
Thanks
Tony

Hi
Checked OVLP item category NLN standard stock Trans item IS relevant for picking
Over delivery Option is blank currently - what will happen if i change to B ?
Thanks
Tony
Edited by: Tony Lannon on Aug 5, 2009 3:33 PM
Edited by: Tony Lannon on Aug 5, 2009 3:34 PM

Problem with a cost element

dear all,
a cost element was created from a society x in ca y.
now this cost element creats some problem for society d and b in ca Y.
some regiastration are made on this cost element so I know that I can delete it until 31.12.2010.
what kind of solution can I have? we don't want tha the registrations made on this account are relevant for controlling.
this is a cost element of type 11.
If I create a cdc Dummy and I imput it every time that I made registration on this account what kind of impact I will have in controlling?
i read that I have to block th account 206131 and create new in copy of it. What kind of impact I will Have?
please help me to solve this issue because we have the ragistration blocked at the moment.
thanks
V.

why you don't suggest me to use this program?
the entries on my cost element are made with tc VL01N..
until 31 of july this kind of registration creates a document FI and a document Profit center.
after the creation of the cost element this kind of registration creates a Fi document, profit center document and a CO document.
I don't want the creation of CO document.
Actually in COEP I have 24 input. I try to simulate the same case in test client.
I create the cost element, I do the same registration, and I have 3 type of document.
then I run the program RKACOR20.
at the end I have only 2 documents: FI and profit centre. (the same situation that I had in july)
then I run tc KA04 and I can delete the cost element.
you think that it is so dangerous to do in production system?
what kind of problem this program can creates to me?
thanks a lot
V.

Early confirmation of activity - Problem with actual cost updating

Hi Guys...
I have trying to find out solution with trail and error basis but.....
The issue is :
Network activity - Planned duration 100hrs
periodic confirmation taken place .... no problem... actual cost also updated accordinly,
at one point of time, realised that activity is completed with 70hrs effort only.
then I have updated 100% completion.
what is the twist here is:
though I have completed 100% of work with 70% of actual hours, however, system display actual costs equals to 100hrs.
I can not reduce planned hours equal to actual hours. at the same, I would like to see my activitiy completed with 70 hrs and actual cost equal to 70hrs of effort only.
is there any enhancement there so that we can have both display planned 100 hrs and actual as 70 hrs.
and costs also.
Looking forward to hear from the gurus and thanks in advance
Shal award points for appropriate answer.
Regards,
PSR

Hi,
One probable solution would be using User status which will block additional confirmations. At the point when you know that work is completed within planned hours, set this user status so that no more confirmation is possible, at th same time user will come to know that activity is completed.
Hope this helps.
Regards

Import purchase - problem with delivery costs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for