Problem in Finding Color Profile of an image?

Hi All,
I am working on applet to read, resize and upload images. i am able to do all this using JAI but there is one more condition that needs to be full filled by my program i.e. to check the color profile of image before uploading (such as sRGB, Adobe RGB 1998).
I tried getType it give me the int number for diffrent color profile but it is not able to differentiate between sRGB and adobe RGB 1998 colour profile. How to get the colour profile embeded in the image.
Thanks
Rohit.

Yes, but its a profile (rendering and editing data calibration) for imaging not any particular java image(in crude terms at this point) [http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/adobergb.html|http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/adobergb.html]
If you want the maths for the image data profile [http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/pdfs/AdobeRGB1998.pdf|http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/pdfs/AdobeRGB1998.pdf]
presumably you were returning int getType() from a BufferedImage , the adobe profile image data is 24 bit true colour and heavily implied to be related to imaging data from "capture devices" which then implies from no mention in their documentation of "alpha component" , so in java any 24 bit non-indexed colour model RGB alike the windows bit map as the getType() "constant field value" int would be acceptable pending and other colour model excluded for render purpose of true colour(read BufferedImage API pages' "constant field values" for image type).

Similar Messages

  • Remove color profile from an image

    How to remove color profile from an image is it possible through any script?
    Manual Try - Don't Color Manage this Document: option is used to instruct Photoshop to remove an existing embedded profile but when I save the file, close and open it I still see a color profile in the embedded image.

    On the mac you could have sips do this (it may depend on the file type). You would loose the files creator if Photoshop was its last editor though.

  • Selected color profile for new images from "clipboard" is wrong in CS6

    I have given up trying to find the answer to this myself.
    Steps to reproduce:
    1. Take a screenshot of something in your web browser (macintosh CMD+SHIFT+4) to the clipboard.
    2. Select File > New from the menu. Clipboard should be the selected Preset.
    3. Notice how in CS6 the color profile under "Advanced" is "Display" and NOT "sRGB" — in CS5 it is sRGB.
    4. Paste from the clipboard into your new document and get the color profile mis-match warning if you are in CS6.
    It is either not picking the color space of the clipboard properly like it will in CS5, or I am missing something somewhere.
    Nothing I do in an attempt to fix this is working. I have sRGB set as my default profile in color settings, and nothing I do changes this setting for the "Clipboard" preset.
    I am getting sick of forgetting to manually select "sRGB" every time, opening up a new document sized to my clipboard and then getting the color profle mismatch warning when I paste in the clipboard contents!
    I take so many screenshots as I develop websites this is a CONSTANT problem as I am constantly creating new documents from the clipboard to check alignments, zoom in to get color samples, and many other reasons.
    Message was edited by: DrunkCyclist

    That helps a little. It explains why "Display" is selected when I create a new from the clipboard in PS.
    The ColorSync profile from a screenshot opened in the Preview App shows up as "Color LCD" in the inspector.
    So, I assume what is happening in PS is that the new document is being created in the working color space and my clipboard contents don't match that and therefore causes the warning?
    I could see getting a warning if I create a new document from the clipboard in PS and it embeds the "Display" profile within it, and then I try and paste something which has an sRGB (or other) embedded profile, but I was assuming the new document from the clipboard contents would have the same color profile as the clipboard contents.
    I just don't get why I get a warning when I create the new document and the very first thing I try and do is paste the clipboard contents into said document.
    However, when I select "sRGB" from the dropdown list instead of "Display" in the PS dialogue box it does not give me the mismatch warning.
    Although the warning does say my source and destination document are both using the "Display" profile but my working space is sRGB.
    The more I think about it, I may have just checked the "Don't show again" box in CS5 if I ever had the same issues and therefore never dealt with that again!
    I am going to go read as much as I can about the color profiles in PS. I used to deal with this a lot as a print designer but not so much anymore working in UI design. I only really look into these issues when I get weird color shifts on saved files and things of that nature.
    Thanks for taking the time to explain some things!

  • Where to find color profile for Nikon D80? Then how do I apply it?

    I've tried googling and found a few places that claim to have ICC profiles for my Nikon D80. I've seen people say, "oh use program X or Y to apply it" but I want to do everything in Photoshop (CS6, on my Mac running Yosemite). Can someone point me at a place to find an ICC profile so I can get my Nikon NEF raw images into CS6?
    Can you further tell me how to install the profile? I've tried all three locations described at Introduction to Icc Profiles and I've rebooted many times. No luck! The ICC files I've got look find but maybe they aren't?

    Lightroom doesn’t use ICC profiles, it uses .dcp files, DNG Color Profiles.  The profiles come with Photoshop and updates to the Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) plug-in.
    If you really mean the D80, then that has been supported since PS-CS2/ACR 3.4.
    If D80 is a typo and you meant D800, then that has been supported since PS-CS5/ACR6.7.
    If D80 is a typo and you meant D810, then that has been supported since PS-CS6-or-CC/ACR 8.6.
    Do About Plug-ins / Camera Raw and see what precise version you have, and verify which camera model you have.

  • Problem with DNG Color Profiles in Lightroom 5.4

    Hello folks,
    I recently updated from LR 5.3 to Lightroom 5.4 and since then I am having problem when using dng color profiles which were created with Colorchecker Passport. Every time I use such a profile which was created for my Nikon D 800 I get very greenish tones in the pictures.
    I use Windows 7 Pro on a HP Z 210 Workstation. The monitor is a hardware-calibrated Quato which was recently calibrated.
    Does anyone have this problem too and - if yes - know how to fix it?
    Thanks!
    Yours, Albert
    PS: As English isn't my mother tongue I apologize for any mistakes in the text above.

    Hello Andrew,
    I do have a Nikon D 800 and a Fuji X-E1. I haven's noticed a problem with the Fuji so far. I think I will recalibrate my monitor tomorrow and see if the problem still exists.
    I can supply raws and DNG profiles but I don't know where I should upload them - I suggest I could do it on my own webspace. Would that be ok?

  • Change Default Color Profile in New Image Document ?

    I've looked and looked, and even Googled.  Anyone know how to change the default color profile when you start a New image file?  In CS5 mine defaults to sRGB (Under the Advanced drop down) but my CS6 is ProPhoto RGB which means I have to change it manually nearly every time I paste an image copied via right click in a web browser. 

    I think it the same on windows. If I copy things to the clipboard with Photoshop that the document profile seem to be used there when I do a paste there are no color issues.  However if I use Prtscn or Alt+PrtScn to capture screen content.  I'll see that the colors are wrong when I paste the clipboard into a new document if my default color space is not sRGB. Then I need to assign sRGB to the document to correct the colors.
    If I paste a screen capture into the current document the color can be very off and I will not get a prompt on the color mismatch. Therefore I don't think a screen capture has any profile associated with it. And of course the screen has a much lower resolution then the images I edit. So there is also a big size difference. Here is one scaled to 100% zoom after the paste. You can see both the color and resolution difference.  This capture was assigned to sRGB so you will see what the screen looks like after the paste and zoom to 100%.
    Message was edited by: JJMack

  • Problem using custom color profiles in Camera Raw

    Dear Adobe Community,
      I've created a custom color profile using the DNG profile editor, and I've been able to open that custom .dcp file in Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) through Adobe Bridge.  However, when I apply the color profile to the same image, I do not get the same results as I get with the profile editor.  When I open the "corrected" RAW file in Adobe Photoshop, the colors are the same wrong colors that I have in Bridge, am I missing something here?

    Yes, you're missing something.
    Camera profiles are meant to account for different spectral distribution in different light sources, which is something else than different color temperatures. You still have to make all the normal adjustments, like white balancing, to get the image right.

  • How to assign a specific color profile to an image?

    I am in the process of submitting an image electronically.
    They want me to submit images that have the color profile "ISO Coated v2 ECI".
    My image has the color profile "Adobe RGB (1998)", according to File Info, and according to Preview.
    I have downloaded the color profile from eci.org and put them in /Library/Color Sync/Profiles.
    When I open the image in ColorSync Utility, I can see the profile under 'Profiles'.
    However, when I try to assign or match or apply the profile to the image in ColorSync, it does not "stick".
    With 'Match to Profile', I can select the profile (in the dropdown menu under 'Output'). But when I then save the image (using Save, Save As.., or Export..) it seems like it does not put that profile in the image, i.e., when I open the new image using Preview, I still get the "Adobe RGB (1998)" profile.
    Same with 'Apply Profile'.
    With "Assign profile", the profile I want is greyed out.
    I also tried Pixelmator, but that does not offer me the profile "ISO Coated v2 ECI".
    Am I missing something?
    Could some kind soul please shed some light on this?
    Or point me to the right web page or forum?
    All insights and suggestions will be highly appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Gabriel.

    Thanks for your response.
    But, first of all, the profile I want to "set" is not in that list in Preview.
    Second, I believe now that I don't need to just *assign* the profile, I need to *match* the image to it (the profile is an output profile).

  • Color profile for menu images ? (AdobeRGB vs. sRGB)

    Making some menus for a DVD. Original stills started out in AdobeRGB color space, but the designer converted them to sRGB, which shifted the colors and reduced the gamut.
    When the images are authored, I assume they are converted to an NTSC or PAL color space. How does this space compare to sRGB? If the NTSC and PAL gamuts are smaller than sRGB than it doesnt matter, but if they are larger/different, than I think the designer needs to go back to the original AdobeRGB images.
    Anyone have a clue about this?
    thanks...

    I was having a similar problem where there was a color disparity between the still images viewed in Photoshop and the same image viewed in FCP / DVDSP. The little info I have found so far indicates that DVDs use the Generic RGB profile. My results confirmed this. When I converted the working profile of the still images from sRGB to Generic RGB and then updated the media in FCP and DVDSP the results were much better.

  • Color profile problem after installing CS4

    OK.
    First, let me post these side-by-side comparisons:
    As you can see in Image 1 (the "before," left-side photo in each comparison), the colors and overall appearance are distorted. I've read things about gamma but it's all confusing to me. This is surely a color profile problem, right? The transition among pixels that involve colors of yellow and gray is rocky, grainy, and the flat out color is just wrong. Now this color problem affects pictures when opened in both Photoshop 7.0 and the standard Windows Photo Viewer. Meaning, whenever I open pictures in both PS 7.0 and Windows Photo Viewer (my default viewer), this color problem totally messes up certain photos and really damages my ability to edit. I'm an avid photo editor and it's imperative I have proper color display so that I can accurately edit. Keep in mind that certain pictures do not take on this error. When a photo is generally brighter, the distortion is basically invisible. It's photos that are dark or have dark portions in them that display the distortion.
    *Note: I took these before-and-after pictures with my camera, because screencapping would not work, since you all don't have the same color profile issue on your computer. That's the only way I can show you!
    HOWEVER, when I open photos in another standard Windows application, "Microsoft Office Picture Manager," the color problem is magically erradicated altogether. It shows photos as I've been seeing them all along, until I installed CS4 about two weeks ago. Before installing CS4, everything was fine and I had been using Photoshop 7 for years and have never had a problem. I'm guessing CS4 messed something up. It had to have. Just FYI, I uninstalled CS4, hoping it would reverse the problem. But still, the color issue persists in PS 7 and in my regular Windows Photo Viewer.
    Since images display their true form in Windows Office Picture Manager, I don't think I need to calibrate my screen. Or do I? I've read things about it, and to some people, it's not necessary. Right? Okay. I really hope someone can give some advice! Thank you!
    P.S. Here's the original photo. On my screen, it looks distorted when opened in photoshop or opened w/the viewer. However, here on Firefox, it's fine.

    You should try to familiarize yourself with the concepts of color management.
    It's kind of too in-depth a subject to walk you through from a cold start here...  There are a lot of good resources out there to help you get started.  For example, in just a few seconds Google turned up this:
    http://www.adobepress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1315593
    The one thing to remember is this:  There is NO quick solution, easy set of defaults, or direct answer to making your setup do what you want without your having to understand color management.
    People may tell you to calibrate your monitors, or use a particular color profile as a default, or whatever, and they may have good, solid reasons for telling you those things, but if you don't attempt to get your mind around color management it will always seem as though something isn't working right, or is simply magic, which will be frustrating to you.
    Here are some basic questions to ponder:
    What image color profile is your image carrying?
    Is your monitor a wide-gamut display and do you have a color profile set up for it?  What kind of monitor is it?
    What version of Windows are you running?
    Do you know the difference between a color-managed app and one that is not color-managed?
    Which of the apps you're using/showing above are color-managed?
    What are your settings in Edit - Color Settings?
    Take some time and do some research, get your head around the concepts, and it will all make more sense I promise you.
    -Noel

  • Login Window Color Profile Problem

    I just upgraded my Mac Pro from 10.4.11 to 10.5.8 and finally to 10.6. I downloaded the 10.6.4 Combo update and all was fine. When I ran the next round of updates, which included the “Snow Leopard Graphics Update,” my calibrated display color profile was switched to the standard “VGA Display” color profile. That in itself wasn’t a big deal as I readily switched it back (on all 3 user accounts) but, the Login window now uses the standard “VGA Display” color profile and it looks terrible. I have a NEC MultiSync P1150 19” VGA CRT. The video card is the nVidia 7300GT that came with the Mac. This monitor was one I originally spec’d for a friend of mine back in the late 1990’s (MFG date is 1997) and the color is so good yet that I see no reason to replace it. The monitor is not the issue here.
    My question; Is there a .conf file for the login window that I can edit so it selects my calibrated color profile instead? I’ve read the articles http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1083 and http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4286 and it doesn’t appear that I even need this update.
    I imaged my hard drive after each OS upgrade so I have a day old image to revert to 10.5.8 if needed and then run the updates again (this time skipping the graphic update) but, I would rather not have to spend the several hours to revert and upgrade again.
    I have some experience with command line editing in Unix/Linux. I just need to know the correct file(s) to edit. Also, do I have to enable the Root user to do this? I seem to remember reading somewhere that the Root user by default is not enabled in Mac OSX.
    TIA…..Paul

    So, I went ahead and restored from my 10.5.8 image. I upgraded to 10.6 and the login screen matches my user color profile. After the upgrade to 10.6, OSX changed the default color profile to “VGA Display” instead of the “VGA Display Calibrated” profile I had created back in 10.4.11. This uncalibrated color profile looked fine at this point so I left it at that setting. It actually looked a little better that my older calibrated profile. So, no real problem here.
    BTW the older calibrated profile was created using OSX calibration tools in 10.4.x. I’m going to calibrate again in 10.6.4 and see what it looks like. This monitor has excellent color. Game play is super and film photography editing on it has always reproduced very nice matching images.
    I then updated from 10.6 to 10.6.4 with no additional updates applied. The problem with the “Color Profile Challenged Login Screen” happened after the 10.6.4 Combo Update. The “VGA Display” profile had somehow been altered. I switched to Apple RGB and that matched the pre-10.6.4 VGA Display profile.
    Apparently I wasn’t paying close enough attention during the first install. I can deduce at this point that the graphics update wasn’t the problem as I had previously reported. I did set each user color profile to Apple RGB but the login window stays at altered VGA Display. I don’t feel like experimenting with previous combo updates to identify which one is the culprit. I had a few nights to work this out and now I want to get back to using my Mac for other things. I’m going to go ahead and run the rest of the other updates including the graphics update.
    I hope I can get an answer here to see if there is a conf file I can edit to set the login window to use a color profile of my choice. It’s a minor but glaring annoyance that a slightly Monk’ish person like me would like to remedy.
    Otherwise, the system runs fine (even with only 1GB RAM) and my CS1 suite appears to have full functionality.
    TAIA…..Paul

  • Display Calibration Creates Color Profile Problems.

    I haven't received any response out of the MBP Display forum and I thought you guys might have better insight anyway because you are dealing with color calibration more often. Here it is:
    I used colorsync utility to calibrate my monitor, hoping it would at least get the colors more accurate than they are with the "Color LCD" profile. The Color LCD profile has a bad yellow tinge to it. I went through the process 4 times so I would be able to choose the best profile out of the 4. (Now I can't delete the extra profiles but I guess that is a different topic...) The color accuracy and the gray-tone is MUCH better BUT I have a slight (understatement) saturation problem.
    My problem is after using Color Sync, ALL of my REDS are oversaturated and blown out. There is a problem with the blues and greens as well but it isn't as bad. Of course, they look fine in non color managed applications (ie FireFox) but everything else makes my photos look horrible. Even the RAW files straight out of the camera look blown out.
    I had, at first edited these files on a PC so they always looked fine but now that I have switched to Mac I have noticed how oversaturated they are in all of its color managed applications. (Safari, preview, and even the desktop.) I thought perhaps that I had just pumped up the contrast and saturation too high on the PC and the color profile was now creating a problem because the color was set for an un-profiled file. BUT after viewing the unaltered .NEF's straight out of my camera, they too are oversaturated.
    Now, I have some wallpapers I had downloaded from the web that look the same as before. It is just MY OWN photographs that are oversaturated. Obviously I have chosen the wrong color profile or something is wrong with my workflow. The wallpaper that looks the same doesn't have a profile assigned it when I view-info. It just labels the color space as RGB. All my photos that have problems, have a color profile assigned. I am using sRGB as recommended. There are a few still using Adobe RGB (which is what my camera defaults to) and they have the same oversaturation problem.
    Aperture is set to export with an sRGB profile and CS2 uses sRGB as well.
    Any advice? What monitor and color management profile's are you guys using?
    I can't tell what is right anymore. What should I edit my photos to look good in? The only MONITOR profile that doesn't blow them out is Adobe/Apple RGB, Color LCD, and a few of the other default installed profiles.
    I've got a bad case of color vertigo!

    sorry uberfoto, did not get what MBP meant at first.
    what Jan says about color calibration tool is right....and start again from the RAW.....
    i am photographer in the advertisement, reportage, portraits and landscape.
    my problem was to get the thinks printed as I saw them on the screen.
    here what I have to say on that (part of another discussion):
    ".... Sorry, but no AppleTFT Display comes close to a hardware calibrated display. Maybe they are semi-professional. I do not say this to insult Apple, ore somebody else, but i say this to sway out the illusion of , " if I just spend more money on the calibration tool and software, I´ll have better prints". It´s just not possible, because the display cant show what is there. A Apple CRT Studio Display is far better in this. I you want to have a flat-screen TFT Display to bring good results, you have to choose one that is able to be hardware calibrated and has a higher lookup table (EIZO, LaCie, QuatoGrafics......)
    I use use one professional EIZO CG21" and one semi-prof. EIZO FlexScanL985EX(21") and the diffrence is important between the two.
    But i need only one to be Print Proof ready.
    Before i was always afraid when i gave the picture file to my client, because of what my pictures look like once it is printed. Now the outcome is right or differs only very little from what I saw on the screen. my calibration tool is EYE ONE. "..
    BUT your main problem is how it looks in the web.
    my thoughts and suggestion on this:
    1. most people see the web on PC Display. those use a gamma of 2.2
    (apple = 1.8) so pictures appear more blue with more contrast. this setting is made to hide the low ability of the system and display to show colors as they are and give and give crispy impression. So you will have to consider this when you prepare the pictures for the web. therefor the standard calibration of your MBP is best for your needs. ( for printing the Display has to be set on 5.600 kelvin ,that would be to warm 4 the wwweb).
    2.
    a) In the beginning I use Aperture 1.5 (or Lightroom) to select and prepare the pictures as I like them.
    b) then I export them in 8 bit/300 dpi in the size they will be used as PSD or TIFF.
    c) I will then open them in Photoshop (color-settings=web /internet) make the cleaning and so on.( 4 the web I always increase the saturation because sRGB and JPG will throw away lots of colors).
    d) AND NOW "save for the web ". This is definitely the best tool to prepare pictures for the web. on the right upper part of the window there is a flash-open menu where you may choose to see the colors like in windows or macintosh system.
    and on the lower right of the application-window there is a roll-down menu where you may preview the results in different browsers of your choice.
    It is here where you can produce amazing high Q pictures 4 the web under 100 kb.
    Hope this may help.
    good luck,
    larry
    G5 dual 2.3/4,5 gigRam/ATI 9600 128MB-PB G4 12"   Mac OS X (10.4.2)   EIZO CG 21"+EIZO L985ex 21"
    G5 dual 2.3/4,5 gigRam/ATI 9600 128MB-PB G4 12"   Mac OS X (10.4.2)   EIZO CG 21"+EIZO L985ex 21"
    G5 dual 2.3/4,5 gigRam/ATI 9600 128MB-PB G4 12"   Mac OS X (10.4.2)   EIZO CG 21"+EIZO L985ex 21"

  • Bridge doesn't recognize color profiles

    Dear Adobe community,
    I'm using Adobe Bridge CS5.1 (4.1.0.54) and Illustrator CS5.1 (15.1.0), and I'm experiencing a very confusing and disturbing color management problem between these two applications. In short, for some unknown reason Bridge doesn't seem to respect or simply cannot read CMYK color profiles that I've applied to an artwork within Illustrator, but rather labels the file as "Untagged" and displays it with clearly desaturated colors. To illustrate the problem I've created some screenshots having Bridge on the left hand side and Illustrator on the right displaying the same illustration with various color profiles applied. That is, in each case I assigned different color profile to the image in Illustrator, saved the file and took the screenshot of Bridge and Illustrator both displaying the image. Now if you look closely then perhaps you notice that the only time I got a visual match between these applications was when I switched the file to a RGB mode within Illustrator. But even then Bridge did not recognized the correct color profile but interpreted it as "Untagged". Here are the screens:
    Bridge "Untagged" vs. Illustrator "U.S. Web Coated":
    Bridge "Untagged" vs. Illustrator "Coated FOGRA39":
    Bridge "Untagged" vs. Illustrator "Don't Color Manage This Document":
    Bridge "Untagged" vs. Illustrator "Adobe RGB":
    Hope you could see the difference from these tiny images. Looking from my monitor, I can tell you for sure that they are definitely off, except the RGB versions of the illustration. This made me surmise that perhaps Bridge can only display Working RGB profiles correctly and not anything else.
    Here's also my color settings, just in case…
    So... Why is that??? Why are these applications showing me different results while my color settings are supposed to be "Synchronized"? Is there a way to fix this? I have tried to play around with the settings and looked for a solution in the web but to no avail. Could you please help me to find a soulution to this disturbing problem?
    All the best,
    Juhani

    You may have used the broken global Purge Cache command in Bridge Preferences, or the cache is otherwise corrupted. Try Purging the Cache through the Tools menu in Bridge for each folder. Tools > Cache > Purge cache for 'foldername'.

  • Can't get white color to stay white between color profiles

    Hello,
    I installed Photoshop CS4 and am using a Samsung flat panel monitor. I do web design and print design. Here is the problem:
    Web design:
    Color profile is set to Monitor Color
    Proof color is set to Monito RGB
    Proof Colors is checked
    When I save image through Save For Web, it looks fine in the preview box but in some browsers it has blue tint (even the white color now looks blue)
    I tried embedding the monitor coor profile into the exported JPEG and tried converting to sRGB and it always is a problem
    Print design:
    When I make a new CMYK document 300dpi the white now has a yellow tint.
    I tried to paint the entire image white (and the foreground color is clearly white) then go with the eyedropper it says its fff6db (yellowish)
    Proof Color: working CMYK
    CMYK Color: US Web Coated (SWOP) v2
    Color Managment Policies are all off
    What I want is an explanation of how I can make sure that the colors are correct on my screen such that what I see on the monitor is exactly what everyone will see on their browsers. And that there are no color shifts. I had version 6 at work and its fine, when I converted from RGB to CMYK the colors just got a little washed out but the whites remained white.
    -Max

    Web design - you're ignoring the display profile, twice.  What you see on your system is exactly what you'll see in the browsers. But nobody else will ever see it exactly the same way because you refer everything to your specific display.
    Print design - you're actually using the display profile, and that profile is wrong.  You're seeing a yellow tint because your monitor profile claims that the white is bluer than it really is, and Photoshop is correcting for that.  To get rid of the tint, you need a display profile that correctly describes your display.

  • Using Color profiles and exporting for web browsers

    I've been trying to figure out the answer to this question. As I'm sure you're aware Safari supports color profiles while other web browsers like Firefox do not. I would like to setup Aperture so that it displays and exports images for the widest audience possible. Unfortunately it embeds a color profile and my images on the web only display correctly in Safari. I've tried changing the proofing profiles and export settings to no avail. I didn't seem to have this problem in iPhoto, a picture there looked the same on screen as it did in Safari and Firefox but I can't achieve the same with Aperture...

    Thanks for that information, unfortunately I'm not really any closer to solving the issue since I've already tried that. 1) by default, doesn't Aperture automatically embed the sRGB color profile? 2) if I set view>proofing mode to sRGB shouldn't what I see on screen match what a "dumb" application such as Firefox does when it ignores the embedded profile and display sRGB? I've tried going into the preferences>export settings and changed everything to sRGB IEC61966-2.1 but I see no difference in the final image between that and the default setting.
    I guess my question is more specific to Aperture since I don't have this problem with other applications. For example, in photoshop if I do Export for Web it strips out any embedded profile and when I open that image in Firefox and Safari side-by-side they are exactly the same. But not so when I export an image from Aperture, when opened in Firefox it is desaturated and flat and of course in Safari it honors the embedded profile and looks fine.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Subsequent update of record, long time to appear in Journalized View

    Hi, I'm running some integration tests that do an insert into a source table, commits the insert, updates that record, commits the update. The cscn numbers are widely spaced, for example, the insert is 69997742 and the update is 70000579. I have a sc

  • My Apple TV (2) won't work with new Router.

    Okay, So I have a new router and everything works but streaming my movies to my AppleTV.  I can access Netflix and other apps but not my own iTunes.  I have no clue as to why. This is what I have done so far: I have rebooted my computer, AppleTV, and

  • QuickVPN on Verizon 4G not working

    QuickVPN is not making a connection over the Verizon 4G network. After "Activating Policy" it tries to verify the network, but always times out. I get the message "remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait? My same setup works on the 3G n

  • Importing tables with OMB+

    Hello all, I would like to import some tables, but not their constraints and I have not been able to do this through the OWB GUI (version 10.2), so I thought maybe I could do it using OMB+ Does anybody know whether it is possible to import tables in

  • ALV Table - inhibit 'View' dropdown, filter button and settings button

    Can someone tell me what methods need to be used to modify an ALV table to inhibit the showing of the functioniality in the header?  I want to introduce this functionality to the users at a later date, but for now it should look like a standard table