Problem with godaddy

i am hosting my wml site on godaddy & using jsp pages to
i have created a dsn on godaddy but still i can't connect to database to retrieve data
i am using ms access database
i have coppied my database in access_db folder as mentioned by godaddy
& change the dsn name given by godaddy in connection string
i think there is still some prob in my connection string
pls suggest me the solution if anyone knows as early as possible

i think there is still some prob in my connection string why do you think that?
are you getting an error?
if so, post it here

Similar Messages

Problems with Godaddy email webmail WBE plugin not working w/ FF

While the basic email is working the plugin WBE fails to work properly
Please get back to me ASAP on fixing this. Prior to the last two updates to FF Fire Fox worked just fine
The WBE plugin does work with IE but '''not with Fire Fox 3.6.12?'''

Again IE8 works fine now but Firefox does not allow me to embed jpegs or png files like it used to in my webmail.
The URL:
http://email00.secureserver.net/pcompose.php
See the uploaded image so you can see what happens when I paste.
I get a broken image picture in the upper left corner
While the picture and the tag seems fine the picture fails to render in FireFox. Any idea why
Here is the source:
<img src="file:///C:/Users/Robert/AppData/Local/Temp/MYFILE.PNG" width="826" border="0" height="665">
This used to be added as an ebedded file but clearly its being added as a linked file? How do I fix that???

Posting iWeb with Godaddy

Hi I have a Godaddy domain and hosting and I have been using Filezilla to upload my files, which for the most part has worked, but there are a few glitches in uploading that I was hoping to get some answers to. For instance, the shading under my banner appears as a bubble line and most slide show buttons are not functioning. I don't know if this is because iWeb widgets dont want to work with godaddy, or if I am uploading them wrong when I am using filezilla. Any help to how to fix these problems is very much appreciated!
Website can be viewed here for reference: Meggierock.com

As long as you purchased a Linux hosting account from GoDaddy, then there is no problem with GoDaddy hosting at all - it is all compatible and will work.
When things don't work, it often means that certain files have not been uploaded, so I would suggest that you download Cyberduck for free from the internet. It another ftp programme that is easy to use and might be better than the one you are using at the moment.

Problems with webmail on godaddy?

I just bought a MacMini in March and have been using godaddy.com webmail because I have a business web site there. I could not get to my email on-line kept telling me the server was not found. So, I called Godaddy, not problem with servers. Then called comcast and reset all of my Safari which is up to date. I had just recently repaired permissions. Still hangs the web mail but then it opens up, then it does not work. All other sites I go to work! Then, I just went back to permissions. Verified and saw I needed to repair a bunch of permissions! What is that all about?? Not sure why my webmail is not responding very quickly. I think it might have something to do with permissions when I did that recently?

From the Safari menu bar, select
Safari ▹ Preferences ▹ Extensions
Turn all extensions OFF and test. If the problem is resolved, turn extensions back ON and then disable them one or a few at a time until you find the culprit.
If you wish, you may be able to salvage the malfunctioning extension by uninstalling and reinstalling it. That will revert its settings to the defaults.

Masking with godaddy problem

I am forwarding my domain name from godaddy to my iweb site. And I am masking the iweb site with my domain name, BUT...
When I place the cursor or arrow over a navigation link, it shows my imac address and non-masked link, in the status bar at the bottom of the safari browser window. But when I select each link to a page, the url is my domain name...which is good, but...
Can I mask the navigation link in the status bar? Am I doing something wrong with the godaddy settings?
Thanks,
cj

So, you really can't mask your imac id?
What is your url? What happens if you use something longer like http://www.mydomain.com/Site/Page.html?
(with Site and Page reflecting the names for your site of course)
I think in general the degree of masking you want and get is an issue for you to take up with godaddy and has nothing to do with iWeb or .Mac.

Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks!

Problems With a Second imap Account

Hi Everyone,
I've been using an IMAP account with Gmail and Mail for a few years now, and I've been quite happy with it. (Although it doesn't seem to save messages I send online to my Sent file offline.)
But I've set up a second IMAP account and I have a couple of problems with it.
1) There's no Inbox in Mail. Under the Your Name Gmail heading, it shows All Mail, Drafts, Important, Sent Mail, Spam, Starred, Trash, Personal, Recipts, Travel, and Work. But no Inbox. So everything shows up in All Mail, including spam, duplicates, trash, and mail I send. Needless to say, this is ugly and fairly useless as an Inbox. How do I set up a real Inbox?
2) I can't get rid of anything. I made the mistake of signing up on a few places (Twitter, Ancestry.com, Archives.com), all of which send me endless piles of junk. When I highlight them and delete them they just come back in All Mail. Even when I delete them from Trash. How do I fix this?
I'm running OS 10.6.8 and Mail 4.6.
Any suggestions most appreciated.
Cheers,
Giles

Frank:
To illustrate what Ethmoid described here's how I forward my domain names at GoDaddy.com:
Click to view full size
The top part is for the regular domain name forward and the bottom is for masking if you choose that option. Masking will put only your domain name in the URL window of each of your site's pages. The downside to that is visitors can only bookmark the entry page of your site. My tutorial site, toadstutorials.info, is setup that way.
OT

Any problem with a single MySQL database used on more than one site?

I have a set of multiple sites hosted separately I'm working on. I'd like to set up a PHP/MySQL database on one site, and be able to pull data from it for completely separate sites. Seems like it shouldn't be a problem. Are there any problems with doing this I need to be aware of?

I've set up databases on three different hosts, and in all cases I could access the databases from outside the domain of the site itslef. GoDaddy is one of them, they used to restrict it, but now they give you the option when setting up a new database on your account.

Dreamwaver CS4 memory errors with GoDaddy

I have a Dreamweaver CS4 and it is contected to GoDaddy for the site hosting by ftp. Dreamweaver locks up several times throughout the day. One of error messages that I get in Windows XP event viewer is:
Faulting application dreamweaver.exe version 10.0.0.4117, faulting module dreamweaver.exe version 10.0.0.4117, fault address 0x002ef264.
Help!
Thanks,
Nichole Plowman

Can you log-in to your server using a 3rd party, dedicated FTP ware like Cute, Ws-ftp pro or Filezilla?
Which settings are you using? Passive FTP on/off? Firewall on/off?
Have you contacted GoDaddy to be sure you have the correct log-in info?
POSSIBLY RELATED ARTICLE:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/494811
Good luck with GoDaddy. I stay clear of their web hosting services because of the problems.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
www.alt-web.com/
www.twitter.com/altweb
www.alt-web.blogspot.com

Problems with certain ga

Hi, i've been having this ongoing problem with some of my games (battlefield 2 and guild wars mainly). Whenever I have the Advanced EQ enabled on my audigy 4, I cant hear any music in either game (i have to go into the options on guild wars, disable the sound, then reenable for it to work, each time i load a map) and cant hear any gunshots in battlefield 2. I have cmss 3d enabled, or 2 doesnt matter same problem, have the calibration on headphones with basic settings all on default values, and i have the LB_2_09_006 drivers installed, and im running windows XP. other than that no other settings have been changed except i put full dynamic range on the dolby digital settings. Please help, really annoying starting up bf2, then having to exit because i left the advanced EQ on

I am having problems similar to what you describe and as described in the locked topic "Page not viewable in Safari." I can't tell you how relieved I am to discover that it is not me! The problem is somewhat intermittent - occasionally my web page will open correctly, but I can't correlate it to any specific action I have taken. Here are the details:
I have a domain name registered with GoDaddy with forwarding & masking to my .Mac account.
I created the homepage for my site using a .Mac template, modified it in Contribute 3 and saved it in the appropriate folder in my Sites folder.
Everything was working fine: when I entered my domain name in Safari 2.0.2, my site's home page opened. Suddenly, a few days ago, it stopped working with Safari (I verified the problem on my husband's Mac). The domain address appears, it doesn't connect to the .Mac page and I get a blank screen. I then did the Java update. After restarting my Mac, I was able to open my page in Safari...once...then it stopped working again. I sent a Safari bug report to Apple.
Everything continues to work fine in Internet Explorer.
Here is the domain name address:
http://www.innerpathyoga.com
Here is the .Mac address it points to:
http://homepage.mac.com/yogitrish/InnerPathYoga/Menu79.html

Dreamweaver CS 5.5 not working with Godaddy FTP with TLS/SSL

I've upgraded to CS 5.5 and tried to connect to a client's Godaddy account with FTP with TLS/SSL it fails. Works perfectly with my mac app Transmit every time as it always has. It doesn't work with implicit or explicit settings with authentication set to none or otherwise.
Can someone please let me know if Dreamweaver will ever be compatible with FTP with TLS/SSL and Godaddy? Or is there some setting I can try that will make it work now somehow?
Been waiting years for this....

SnakEyez02 wrote:
First, that's a Godaddy problem if their security isn't up to par.
That may be the case that Godaddy is also at fault, but every other FTP app I use with Godaddy works fine. It's just Dreamweaver and has always been just Dreamweaver not working with a secure connection to Godaddy. Considering Godaddy is the largest webhost in the USA, you'd think Adobe would have fixed this years ago. I should also mention I'm not endorsing Godaddy and I understand there's plenty of people that don't like Godaddy for very good reasons.
Sent you PM with FTP account with Godaddy yesterday. Thank you for taking a look!
UPDATE: Whoops, I see you responded via private message already. I'll paste most of it here in hopes it helps others to understand the issue:
via SnakEyez02 PM:
Ok this took a lot of digging. I won't say it's not a DW issue 100% and I will report a bug for your problem, but DW is not the problem alone Godaddy needs to share the blame here for a bad certificate. Here is what is happening:
I'll start with DW:
- The settings are correct that were in the post. Port 21, FTP explicit, and the authentication should be set to None (encyprtion only). This is where the transmission is encrypted using SSL, but the certificate is shared and not specific to the domain owner. That is the difference between DW's "none" and "trusted". It's a poor choice of words I'll give them that. However, Godaddy seems to want all connections to be trusted thus the other error you get when you turn on the None option. Now could DW do what Transmit does, warn you and write in an unsigned certificate into the Keychain app, probably, is it best practice for security reasons to "Trust" an unsigned certificate probably not.
Now Transmit:
- As explained above Transmit opens up a prompt to override and create a fake-trusted signed certificate. Thus by forcing the OS to think a legitimate certificate is there it gets you through albeit through unconventional methods.
The problem:
- A good portion of this problem lies with Godaddy. Now I use a shared hosting account and set one up on an independant host for a friend of mine and both of them accept the shared certificates (SSL explicit). The difference is the hostname of the certificate. I ran a traceroute (from Network Utility in Utilities folder) on your website and came up with the following address: 173.201.23x.x.
The problem is that the certificate on your server is actually not for that server which is the reason DW seems to have such an issue with it. The SSL certificate that Godaddy put on your shared server is for host - 173.201.19x.5x. As you can see, it's a certificate for another server. Honestly the fact that Panic's Transmit allows this override scares me a little bit and the fact that Godaddy never noticed this issue either scares me to. So while DW could write in a bad certificate I can see why this is happening.
I know there is not much solice in my answer because it still doesn't alleviate the problem that you have with DW connecting. Unfortunately I do not have a workaround despite my numerous attempts to try and gain access over a secure connection. One alternative you could ask Godaddy for in the meantime is an SSH connection which would allow you to use SFTP instead of FTPS. But that's a short-term solution to a long-term problem.
If you think of anything else feel free to bounce any ideas off me I don't mind. Good luck in getting this solved and I will post a bug report to make Adobe aware of the issue.
Thank you for looking into this issue in depth like you have!
I think the issue might be that Godaddy is applying cost saving measures to keep their prices down in the way they implement their certificates (but it also wouldn't surprise me to know it's simply ineptitude on Godaddy's part either). I'm not sure I fault Panic with Transmit much at all because it clearly warns you about the certificate and it's your choice to continue. And, as it stands now, it's much safer to continue to connect that way with Transmit than to stop and connect with no encryption at all at a public hotspot.
As it stands now, you really shouldn't connect to Godaddy with Dreamweaver at a public hotspot unless you set up an SSH tunnel with your connection first. But enabling SSH is an added expense in many ways including paying for the service, using more computer resources for tunneling and time setting it up and implementation... all because Dreamweaver won't just allow developers the option like Transmit does.
Once again, thank you for looking at this and I hope someone at Adobe finally address this issue for the security of its customers who use Godaddy (which is often not their choice and was, instead, the choice of their clients to use Godaddy as a webhost).
Just a side note, I contacted Godaddy support about this several years ago and they were unresponsive and even hostile about it - So that's definitely another vote against Godaddy from me as well.
Message was edited by: greenbluewave

Having problems with mailscript for my flash site :(

I posted this on another part of this form but thought it may
be more applicable to this portion of the site so I thank you once
again in advance for your help!
I want to say hello to all and thanks for letting me a part
of this great forum. I am having some problems with my flash site
(www.alliancedirect.net) and I am using Adobe Flash CS4 now with my
site with ActionScript 1.0.
I have a form already made on the site (under contact us) but
whatever I do....I can't make it work! I use GoDaddy and their
gdform.psp is what they provide but they don't give the code in
flash. I downloaded some different flash mail scripts and programs
but I don't know how to incorporate it within my own site and I
don't know what to do! I just want the information to be submitted
to me via email and the other forms I will make away from the flash
portion if it is too complicated.
Please let me know what specific information you may need
from me and how you can hopefully help me as soon as possible as I
need this website completely up and running. Again, I appreciatre
the help and look forward to being a part of your community!
-sasss

I found this here:
http://www.actionscript.org/resources/articles/82/3/Send-Email-via-Flash-and-PHP/Page3.htm l
THE CODE
stop ();
function lineAdapt () {
message_send = message;
while (msg_count<length(message)) {
msg_count = msg_count+1;
if ((substring(message_send, msg_count, 2)) eq "
message_send = (substring(message_send, 1, msg_count-2))
+"
"+(substring(message_send, msg_count+2,
(length(message_send))-msg_count+2));
message = message_send;
delete msg_count;
delete message_send;
WHAT THE ABOVE MEANS
Line 1 - Stops the play head.
Line 2 - Defines a custom function lineAdapt which will
convert the flash carriage return marker ( " ") to the PHP
equivalent (" "). This ensures that if the user types a comment
with paragraph breaks, these breaks will be reflected in the email,
rather than it being one very long line of text :o)
Line 3 - Sets variable message_send to the value of message.
This is a storage variable: we will adapt message_send rather than
message because message is being displayed in a text box on screen
and adapting it may cause strange visual output.
Line 4 - Begins a loop which will continue until the newly
created variable msg_count is greater than or equal to the length
of the string contained in message.
Line 5 - Increments msg_count by 1.
Line 6 - Conditional statement which checks if the 2
characters within the string message_send starting at letter number
msg_count are equal to the string " ". If you type data into a text
box in Flash and enter carriage returns, you wills see that the
variable which stores that text fields value is adapted with a " "
inserted where each carriage return should be, so we are looking
for these markers using Line 6.
Line 7 - If Line 6 returns True, replace the " " we just
found with " " (which is the PHP equivalent of " "). This code
looks complicated but it isn't really. Al it does it 'copies' the
characters before and after the " ", the pastes those before,
enters " " and pastes those after. The result is the equivalent
string with " " instead of " ".
Line 8 - Sets the variable message to the finalized version
of message_send, which contains no " " markers. We do this because
when we post our variables PHP will look for variables with the
same name. Remember in the PHP code we refer to the variable
messagenot message_send so we must make sure the correct variable
holds the correct value.
Line 9 - Deletes the counter variable for our loop from
memory
Line 10 - Deletes the temporary message_sendvariable we used
for altering the new line markers.
SEND BUTTON CODE
on (release) {
if (subject eq "" or message eq "" or from eq "") {
stop ();
} else {
lineAdapt();
loadVariablesNum ("mail.php3", 0, "POST");
gotoAndStop (2);
WHAT THE ABOVE MEANS
Line 1 - Says "Perform these actions when this button is
clicked then released"
Line 2 - Checks to see if any variable has no value. We don't
want people sending us mail with no reply address for instance.
Line 3 - Line 2 returns True, stop.
Line 4 - Line 2 returns False, go on.
Line 5 - Perform the predefined function lineAdapt () on our
currently entered variables.
Line 6 - Send variables, using the POST method, to our PHP
script which will send the email off. (Note that you could also use
LoadVars objects in place of LoadVariables if you wish to make this
more synchornous. See the LoadVariables and LoadVars tutorial.)
Line 7 - Go to the confirmation message and stop once the
email is sent.

Coding problem with my website

On my website, rockycapellaprods.com, I have a coding problem with the labeling of the videos as well as the videos playing on the website. Everything works great on the IWEB site, but as I loaded the information on the GoDaddy hosting site, several pages have a problem with the playing the videos and having several of the images moving onto the written areas. Do you have any solutions so the videos and the images stay on the website where I set them up?

this would be a problem with style sheets or CSS and common with iFrames. If you have a fixed width for the body on your page template, you will have varying results of layout when you view the page.
If you have your editor stretched to a certain width across your screen, you will likely be able to layout all your text blocks and objects into the places you want which may or may not ignore the "width" restrictions of the body. when you upload the site and open it in a browser, the layout could change because of the width restrictions in the HTML or CSS code and thus "wrap" to the next line.
THe solution is to be familiar with static and fixed positioning of text and objects within your page. Be familiar with text that wraps around images, or images placed within a text box, etc. How your images and text react in relation to each other is all part of the code for the objects, text, and body parameters combined.
I'm sorry there isnt a fast fix for this, and it would literally be an extended lesson posted here online to take you thru understanding the code, how it works, what its affects are, style sheets, template restrictions and so on. One thing you can do is stretch the browser window open more to see if your objects align themselves similar to what you saw in iWeb editor. if it does, your template is set to "percentage of page width" for the body of the page.
Message was edited by: iRocket
Message was edited by: iRocket

This just started today. I can't open my web based email with godaddy. I can see the item when it loads but it will not open to read, reply or anything else.

I can not read my web based email account with godaddy. It started this morning. I can open the page to see the email headlines each email is frozen and will not open.

When you have a problem with one particular site, a good "first thing to try" is clearing your Firefox cache and deleting your saved cookies for the site.
1. Clear Firefox's Cache
orange Firefox button ''or'' Tools menu > Options > Advanced
On the Network mini-tab > Offline Storage : "Clear Now"
2. If needed, delete the site's cookies here
While viewing a page on the site, right-click and choose View Page Info > Security > "View Cookies"
Then try reloading the page. Does that help?

Mail App not reliably downloading IMAP messages with GoDaddy

I've had an intermittent problem with the Mail app, where it doesn't download messages that are on the server. This occurs on a 2013 MBP and a 2009 iMac with identical symptoms on both. Both are running Yosemite 10.10.1.
I'm set up as IMAP with a GoDaddy account. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't - at least until I go offline and then go online again - which was a 2nd Level Apple tech's "solution".
As a workaround, I've installed Thunderbird, which works flawlessly (also IMAP). I'd switch to that for good, but my main customer database program (Daylite) will only log and record messages from the Mail app.
I've sent test messages from a different account - a Gmail account. I can see them in GoDaddy's WebMail. Thunderbird shows that the message arrived within seconds. My iPhone 5 and iPad Air receive mail properly.
Everything works perfectly - except the Mail app.
Apple points their finger at GoDaddy. GoDaddy says that they don't support Mac - but points their finger back at Apple.
I just want my app to work. Any ideas?
- Thanks in advance.
Charlie MacPherson

same is true with popmail, not just imap.
moreover, i think hitting "remove now" just puts content in your server's trash folder, meaning it's still taking up disk quota and you'll never know till you stop getting mail...

Problem with godaddy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for