Problem with multiple instances of shared printers being installed on client computers when the spooler service is started

Hello,
We have Windows Server 2012 and clients using Windows 8.  We've been having some printer problems for awhile now that I haven't been able to figure out for the life of me.  The main problem is the fact that printers are installed on computers automatically
once the drivers are installed.  The side-effect of multiple instances of each printer showing up is very annoying but I suspect fixing the initial problem will resolve this secondary one.
Here is the rundown:
We add the shared printers on logon to the clients using the GPO thus installing the drivers locally.
Whenever the spooler on the client is restarted with the drivers installed, all of the
shared printers that were previously installed get duplicated 5 more times (for a total of 6 instances of each shared printer) on the "Devices and Printers" page.  This happens
all the time.
Removing them only fixes the issue temporarily, as soon as the spooler or computer is restarted, it seems these shared printers are somehow found on the network and the duplicates return.
Two of these printers are located on different clients, installed locally and shared while the other three are all installed on a server and shared through it.  The issue is the same on all of them.
Cleaning the spooler completely (registry and files from C:\system32\spool) fixes the issue temporarily as well since, as soon as the drivers are reinstalled, the issue occurs again.
I've tried many things (disabling the GPO, editing the GPO, printer shares, registry, etc.) and searched tirelessly online for a cause and solution but I'm stumped.  Does anybody have any idea what might be causing this problem and how to resolve it?
Thanks for your time!
Update #1: I just tried adding the NoNetCrawling option in the registry found in this article -> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/320138/en-us
I couldn't find the same for Windows 8 unfortunately.  I also tried disabling network discovery and all other sharing options to no avail.
Update #2: I tried isolating the computer to a different subnet and restarting the spooler and, sure enough, the issue didn't occur.  This proves that the issue is network share related.  Also, as soon as I change the IP back to the regular domain
subnet one, the multiple printer instances re-appeared again.
Update #3: I just tried doing the same thing but on the server where the printers are installed and shared and, sure enough, despite being in a different subnet, the issue occurred.  This leads me to believe there is a setting on this server at fault.
 Question is, which one?

We have deployed a brand new Active Directory domain for a customer. ALL the servers without exception are Windows 2012 R2 and all clients are Windows 8.1 32bit VDI clients.
The issue that we have is around network printers. 
We are deploying 4 printers  from a Windows 2012 R2 Server via the print management/Deploy Printer and assigning that to a GPO. The printers are deployed to the Computers which should mean that the users get all 4 printers which they then should be allowed
to set their default and personal settings for that printer.
Our printers are deployed like this:
1. Created security group
2. Assigned VDI computers to the security group
3. Created GPO to reflect security group
4. Modify GPO to do security filtering based on computer group membership
5. Deployed 4 x printers through Print Management to the GPO on a per machine basis
However, on the users Devices and Printers screen we are not seeing the 4 printers. For some users
they see duplicates of all 4 printers so e.g they can have upwards of 8 or more. Other users have no printers displayed whatsoever. The next time they log off or restart they then have a different amount of printers displayed.
If they try and set the default then it will set and the next time they check the default may have moved to another printer even without logging off or back on.
Now, where this gets strange is within an application such as MS Word 2013 or Notepad if they use the file and print menu the printers will be listed, even if the user has no printers displayed in Devices and Printers. If the users selects a printer then they
can then print OK.
If we check HKCU\Printers||Connections then the CORRECT 4 printers are showing as to what is being deployed via the GPO so I know that the Windows 8.1 terminals are receiving the correct printers from the GPO.
To try and correct this over the course of the week we have deployed the printers via Group Policy Preferences to the user and then the PC to no avail. Currently we are using the Print management\Deployed Printers to deploy all 4 printers to the computer via
the Computer GPO.
I believe that this issue is related to the display somehow in Devices and Printers rather than a GPO or print server issue as we can see via the registry the clients are receiving the 4 correct mentioned printers as shown in the registry. 
FYI: We only have around 30 users and all users are getting this problem. All users are receiving the same GPO's and have the same few apps installed, Office 2013, Adobe Reader etc.
What we want is for the computers to receive all 4 printers. All users should be able to use all 4 printers but the user should be able to select their particular default, depending where they are located or what they are printing that particular day. Their
particular default should persist after reboot. (We have 2 x Copiers and 2 x HP Laserjets) All users have redirected documents and desktop but the rest of the profile is on the VDI and persists after their reboot. The profile is not roaming as the user is
assigned a particular VDI.
After a week of scratching our heads with this we are open to suggestions and any would be appreciated.
We have tried following the issues on this thread to no avail either as they still return.

Similar Messages

  • Why do i constantly get cut off on calls.  I've had this problem with my 3GS, my 4S and now my iPhone 5.  When the core functionality is Phone, i.e. the ability to talk, why can't Apple make the iPhone function as a Phone?  is there an App for that !!

    why do i constantly get cut off on calls.  I've had this problem with my 3GS, my 4S and now my iPhone 5.  When the core functionality is Phone, i.e. the ability to talk, why can't Apple make the iPhone function as a Phone?  is there an App for that !!

    Well, since you've had the same problem, with three different phones, that all use different size sim cards, it seems pretty obvious the problem is with your carrier/coverage & nothing to do with your phone or sim card.

  • Problem with multiple instances of same module

    I want to call the same module in several different
    viewstates. Based on a variable for each viewstate the module
    returns different results. Here is a shortened version of my code:
    private var lm:linkModule;
    private function moduleHandler(promotion:String):void
    lm = linkModule(lm1.child);
    lm.initHandler(promotion);
    <mx:ViewStack id="estonishViewStack" width="100%"
    height="100%">
    <mx:Canvas x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%"
    id="saleView" label="Sales">
    <mx:ModuleLoader id="lm1" url="modules/linkModule.swf"
    ready="moduleHandler('sale');" />
    </mx:Canvas>
    <mx:Canvas x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%"
    id="seasonalView" label="Seasonal">
    <mx:ModuleLoader id="lm1" url="modules/linkModule.swf"
    ready="moduleHandler('seasonal');" />
    </mx:Canvas>
    </mx:ViewStack>
    Is there a more elegant (shorter) way to code the
    actionscript function other than a number of "if" statements based
    upon the variable or module id?

    Thanks for the comment. I purposely used the same id in the
    example. I need to call the same module in about 10 different
    viewstates. I was wondering is there a way around 10 different "if"
    statements in my moduleHandler function with lm1.child, lm2.child,
    etc.
    Possibly some way to write the function with lm(i).child?
    Then I give each component a different component name.

  • It is so nice spending 2 hours on a phone to be hung up upon waiting for a supervisor. After being told the day before I would get a call when the customer service representiave started her shift at 7pm to give me more answers. I do not like to be stuck w

    What a frustrating experience I have had trying to get away from This phone and Plan. I just want to down grade this phone. What difference does it make to you here? All VZW will do is re certify the phone and give it to someone else. I just would like to down grade to a cheaper phone and do away with android os. I still have the same issues with the phone as I did with my other one within a hour of re activating it. I should have no issues with the os it is flawed and should not happen. I am sorry to say but The blackberry OS is a lot more stable. There may not be as many apps but it is more productive and being able to multi task is a lot more needed on a phone. I was told yesterday I would get a call back today at 7pm when this tech support lady would start her shift to give me my options and she did not call. Making me call at 930pm today and after talking to someone I waited for 45 minuets to be hung up on. That is a real great way to treat a customer and make things better. I just want away from the Andriod OS. What difference does it make to you as a company to make a customer happy who was with you since 08 and having a second device added on to the account? What Poor way to treat someone to make them happy with all the profits you have and can't give anything back to a customer.

    What a frustrating experience I have had trying to get away from This phone and Plan. I just want to down grade this phone. What difference does it make to you here? All VZW will do is re certify the phone and give it to someone else. I just would like to down grade to a cheaper phone and do away with android os. I still have the same issues with the phone as I did with my other one within a hour of re activating it. I should have no issues with the os it is flawed and should not happen. I am sorry to say but The blackberry OS is a lot more stable. There may not be as many apps but it is more productive and being able to multi task is a lot more needed on a phone. I was told yesterday I would get a call back today at 7pm when this tech support lady would start her shift to give me my options and she did not call. Making me call at 930pm today and after talking to someone I waited for 45 minuets to be hung up on. That is a real great way to treat a customer and make things better. I just want away from the Andriod OS. What difference does it make to you as a company to make a customer happy who was with you since 08 and having a second device added on to the account? What Poor way to treat someone to make them happy with all the profits you have and can't give anything back to a customer.

  • Server 2012 - Problem with multiple instances of RDS looking to the same license server. Server Pools requiring the wrong servers.

    Hi All,
    I have two domains, prod.local and test.local.  On prod.local, I have a license server living on the connection broker.  I have created a two way trust between the domains so that the RDS instance on test.local can use the license server on prod.local.
     When I first setup the RDS instance on test.local and point it to use the license server on prod.local everything appears to work, all servers recognize the license server.  
    However when I log off and back on, and click the RDS dashboard in test.local, the Remote Desktop Services overview states I need to add every server from prod.local to the server pool.  This is bothersome because the Remote Desktop Services on test.local
    is still functioning, but I am no longer able to manage it.  When I add the servers from prod.local to the server pool I am displayed the setup for prod.local instead of test.local
    Is there a way around this?  Can I use the same RDS license server key multiple times?
    tldr: Using a different domain's license server causes my RDS instance in Server Manager to display the wrong RDS farm.

    Hi Nathan,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server forum.
    Please check the required ports must be opened on firewall.
    - To issue RDS Per User CALs to users in other domains, there must be a two-way trust between the domains, and the license server must be a member of the Terminal Server License Servers group in those domains.
    - To restrict the issuance of RDS CALs, you can add RDS Host Servers into Terminal Server Computers group on RDS Licensing servers.
    - Configure RDS licensing server on all RDS Host Servers in each domain/forest. You can do it through RDS host configuration snap-in or through a group policy. 
    - Add administrators group of each domain/forest in the local administrators of RDS licensing server. This way, you’ll not get a prompt to enter your credentials when you’ll open RDS host configuration snap-ins in trusted domains/forests.
    More information:
    Best practices for setting up Remote Desktop Licensing (Terminal Server Licensing) across Active Directory Domains/Forests or Workgroup
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2473823
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki

  • Problem with multiple versions of documents being published with 001, 002, etc.

    I am using Contribute CS3. I am having a problem with multiple versions of documents being published on the sever with 001, 002, etc in the name. So that I end up with 2 or 3 versions of a document on the server. Does anyone know why / how Contribute  is doing this? Thanks for any help you can give.

    Your Web site administrator will need to update your key to allow you to delete files you are able to edit.

  • Problem with multiple Toplink/JPA apps in same server

    Anyone have experence of running serveral Toplink/ EJB-3 Web apps in the same server (OC4J, alas)?
    We seem to get a problem with the second app failing to initialise toplink, with an entity not found message. Each app runs OK on it's own.

    Yes, they access the same datasource and most of the tables overlap.
    We're thinking it might help to have common entity classes and put them in a shared library, but I don't know if this is relevant (setting up shared libraries complicates testing and tends to snowball, I reckon we need about 15 jars all told).
    I''ve had some funnies on OC4J before which I think may be to do with it's use of ClassLoaders, for example I initially put persistence.xml in the libary jar with the data model, but for some reason I get the entity not found error that way. It only seems to work if it's in the classes folder.
    For the moment we're getting arround the problem with multiple OC4J instances in the server.

  • Problems with multiple connections in the same transaction

    Hi all !
              I'm have two questions regarding the way weblogic handles multiple
              connections.
              1) first, I don't understand why weblogic always create a new Managed
              Connection when I'm asking for 2 connection handles on the same connection
              factory and with the same connectionRequestInfo. Isn't it supposed to share
              connections ?
              For instance, the following snippet of code results in the creation of 2
              managed connections:
              ConnHandle conn1 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
              ConnHandle conn2 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
              The class corresponding to myRequInfo does implement the equals and hash
              method, so that weblogic's connection manager could use them to check that
              the queried connections are the same, and thus could share a single
              ManagedConnection between multiple connection handles. Apparantly it does
              not do that...
              2) OK, I just let weblogic create the 2 managed connections, but... My use
              of the connections is as part of a transaction. Here is what happens:
              ConnHandle conn1 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
              // a new managedConn1 is instanciated. the following happens (just a
              description)
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS)
              // I use the conn1 handle
              conn1.close();
              //xar1.end(SUSPEND)
              ConnHandle conn2 = myCF.getConnection(myRequiInfo);
              // a new managed connection managedConn2 is instanciated.
              // xar2 = managedConn2.getXAResource();
              // xar2.start(RESUME)
              // I use conn2 handle
              conn2.close();
              // xar2.end(SUSPEND);
              // my bean returns from the remote invocation
              // the client of the bean asks to commit (using UerTransaction.commit on the
              client side)
              // xar2.end(SUCCESS)
              // xar2.commit(onePhase=true);
              // managedConn2.cleanup();
              And that's all. So, as one can see, managedConn1.cleanup was never called.
              When looking in the weblogic console, I can see that I have one connection
              with 0 handle and one with 1 handle, deemed as still being in a transaction.
              So, the conenction manager apparantly loses a managed connection during the
              transaction. And it's very very bad because after a couple of transactions,
              I'm running out of managed connections (I had set a limit of 10).
              Any one has seen such a weird behavior ? Is this a problem on my side, or
              weblogic's ? Thanks for your help.
              Sylvain
              

              I ran another test. This time I have a bean that makes use of a connector
              once per method invocation. The bean method invoked is "sayHello" and it
              gets a connection to the EIS, perform an operation on it and release it. The
              connector I developed uses XA transactions.
              My test client just calls 3 times myBean.sayHello().
              I can distinguish two cases:
              1) first, the client doesn't do transaction demarcation. In this case, since
              the sayHello method is marked as requiring transaction, the folowing happens
              in the bean:
              // **** first invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConn1 is instanciated
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
              // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close()
              // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
              // managedConn1.cleanup()
              // **** second invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnection is called. It returns the
              managed connection (managedConn1) that is in the passed set
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
              // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close
              // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
              // managedConn1.cleanup()
              // **** third invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnection is called. It returns the
              managed connection (managedConn1) that is in the passed set
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
              // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close
              // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
              // managedConn1.cleanup()
              2) second case : the client performs transaction demarcation. In that case,
              the connection manager instanciates 3 managed connections, calls start/end
              on each XAResource corresponding to each managed connection, calls commit
              once, but also calls cleanup only once, leaving 2 lost managed connections
              The client looks like this:
              UserTransaction utx = context.lookup("javax/transaction/UserTransaction");
              utx.begin();
              MyBean myBean = ctx.lookup(".......");
              myBean.sayHello();
              myBean.sayHello();
              myBean.sayHello();
              utx.commit();
              on the server the following happens:
              // **** first invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConn1 is instanciated
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
              // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close()
              // xar1.end(SUSPEND);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // **** second invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConn2 is instanciated
              // xar2 = managedConn2.getXAResource()
              // xar1.isSameRM(xar2) is called. returns true
              // xar2.start(RESUME);
              // managedConn2.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close()
              // xar2.end(SUSPEND);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // **** third invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConn3 is instanciated
              // xar3 = managedConn3.getXAResource()
              // xar2.isSameRM(xar3) is called. returns true
              // xar3.start(RESUME);
              // managedConn3.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close()
              // xar3.end(SUSPEND);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // the client invokes commit on the UserTransaction
              // xar3.end(SUCCESS);
              // xar3.commit(onephase = true);
              // managedConn3.cleanup();
              And so, managedConn1 and managedConn2 got lost in the way...
              What's more puzzling, it's that when monitoring my connector with the
              console, I can see that there are 3 connections. 2 declared as still having
              one handle used and being in transaction, and one not in transaction and
              with 0 active handle. BUT when monitoring the JTA part of the server, I can
              see that there has been 1 transaction that committed, and no connection is
              "in flight" as the console says. So, on one side the console says 2 managed
              connections are still part of a transaction while on the other it says that
              no transactions are currently in flight.
              Thanks for any kind of help on this very bizarre behavior.
              Sylvain
              

  • UCCE with multiple instance

    Hi everyone,
    I have a plan to install UCCE 8.0 with multiple instance in my lab environment.
    I'm not sute that, do I have to use hosted model or use enterprise and just create multiple instance on it.
    Actually, I want to implement multi-tenant , I'm not sure because I see that enterprise model also can add more than 1 instance.
    And if I use one of this model, could anyone tell me that what server I have to separate.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Tinnakorn

    Hi Tinnakorn,
    The Cisco Unified Contact Center Hosted (Unified CCH) solution is largely the same as Unified CCE, but it supports multi-tenant or shared servers to manage multiple customer instances. That is the reason you see the capability to add multiple instance, even in UCCE.
    All Unified CCE systems are deployed as a single instance (using the same instance name and number in setup) across all the Unified CCE components.
    Please refer to UCCE SRND for more details.
    Thanks,
    Hitesh

  • Safari 5.0.4 Problem with multiple overlaying plugins

    Hi!
    I experience an issue only in Safari on a webpage with multiple overlaying plugins. The overlaying plugin will not render in the browser. For instance, on the mainpage there is a flash-banner. When logging in it opens an iFrame overlaying the banner. This login-frame contains java, but Java will not render or load in Safari. Everything is ok in other browsers and a peculiar thing is that the problem only occurs in Safari on certain types of Macs like MacbookPro and iMac. The ordinary MacBook displays everything ok.
    The problem must be related to plugins overlaying cause if i resize or zoom in the browser, it may render. If i go to another subpage without the flash-banner, the java-login appears ok. On another subpage it opens an iFrame containing Flash, but the background is also flash. The same problem again. Flash in the iFrame won`t render.
    A workaround is to make Java open in its own process (through the Java control panel), but this aint good since all MacBookPro- and iMac-users have to do this. Flash doesn`t have this option either.
    When Safari 5.0.4 was released, the changelog said: "Improved stability for webpages with multiple instances of plug-in content".
    Updates Safari on several different Macs, but the problem consists.
    Anyone know anything about this?

    Hi,
    I use ClickToFlash to get around the overlays.
    http://clicktoflash.com/
    Gives you complete control over Flash content.
    Carolyn

  • HT6065 I installed this update.  I have never had problems with "multiple prompts to unlock "Local items" keychain" until after I installed this update.  Now, I can't get it to STOP prompting me.

    So how do I fix this?  How do I get this to go away?  It's prompting me for a password that I haven't ever set up!

    I have the same problem with three pop-up prompts:
    (1) com.apple.iCloudHelper wants to use the "login" keychain. Please enter the keychain password.
    (2) CalendarAgent wants to use the "login" keychain. Please enter the keychain password.
    (3) AddressBookSourceSync wants to use the "login" keychain. Please enter the keychain password.
    I can enter my login password and the prompt goes away for a little while, but eventually returns.  Or I can click on "Cancel" many multiple times and it goes away for a little while, but returns again.
    I want a solution too and hope this additional information will help.

  • Sql server with multiple instance

    hi  All,
    i want  to  install sql server with two instance   and i want  to assign two  separate is  ips   for  both   default instance  and named  instance   and  both   should  work like
    two different server
    note:  If i  logged  with  one  ip(default instance)   it should  show  its  own  databases  not both or  named   instance  databases
    thanks 
     chintala

    Hi chintala,
    According to your description, if you want to assign the two different IP to stand for default instance 
    and named  instance, I recommend you set up aliases on a SQL Server with multiple instances. For example, a physical server is named WinServer and 2 instances of SQL Server named WinServer and WinServer\instance1.
    We need to add 1 IP addresse to the WinServer, there is one IP address already assigned to WinServer, 192.168.1.1, by adding one new IP's, 192.168.1.2 .
    We need to move into DNS to configure our host names and aliases.  The physical machine must be steup as a static IP in DNS. SQLAlias1, which point to the default instance on WinServer, will be setup as a DNS with an address of 192.168.1.1.
    SQLAlias2, which will point to WinServer\Instance1, will be setup as a new Host (A) record in DNS with an address of 192.168.1.2.
    When everything has been completed on the DNS side, you need to open up SQL Server Configuration Manager on WinServer and configure the protocols for each instance one at a time, restart the 3 SQL services.
    For more information about how to set up aliases on a SQL Server with multiple instances, you can review the similar article.
    http://kevine323.blogspot.com/2013/08/setting-up-aliases-on-sql-server-with.html
    Regards,
    Sofiya Li
    Sofiya Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Problems with multiple idocs in one file ( Inbound file )

    HI,
    Thanks in Advance for your suggestions.. Highly appreciated.
    We have problems with multiple IDocs in one file.
    We are using XIB ( Amtrix ) as Middleware to receive the files.
    Curretenly When the file contains one IDoc then there is no problem. IDoc is created and everything is ok.
    If file contains two IDocs ( for example two messages ORDERS and DELVERY ) then it is creating two IDocs but both IDocs contains ORDERS plus DELIVERY segements information. That is the problem. Some how SAP unable to differentiate the IDocs in the file.. But it knows that how many idocs are there in the file..because it is creating exact number of idocs.
    We are using TRFC port ... Do I need to change it to File port..
    When we have more than one idoc do we need set any parameter in the file ...

    Thanks for the swift response. Always ideas are useful.
    As of now , Middleware cannot split the file.
    Thing is SAP is creating two Idocs with different message types. Problem is First IDoc contains ORDERS message type but also DELIVERY segments as well. Second IDoc with DELIVERY message tyoe but ORDERS segments as well... This is the problem... I think we are missing some field activation in file for EDIDC record.
    As far as I know file port supports the number of IDocs in one file.. Hope TRFC port also supports that

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 8452: - Fix flicker problem with constraint bound text that is being autoSized.

    Revision: 8452
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-07-08 08:38:32 -0700 (Wed, 08 Jul 2009)
    Log Message:
    - Fix flicker problem with constraint bound text that is being autoSized.  If the remeasure is done in a 2nd pass you will see a flicker as all the objects are moved to accommodate the reflowed text.
    - Fix data binding issue with text setter.
    - Rework measure() to accommodate implicit autoSize.
    If explicitWidth or widthInChars specified and explicitHeight or heightInLines specified, or for now, blockProgression != "tb", the text has fixed dimensions and is not auto-sized.
    If no text and width specified, but no height, start at specified width and one line high and grow taller.
    If no text and height specified, start at 1 char wide with the specified height and grow wider.
    If neither width nor height specified, and toFit lineBreaks, start at explicitMaxWidth, or default maxWidth of 160, and grow taller.
    If neither width nor height specified, and explicit lineBreaks width is unlimited and can grow taller.
    These are further constrained by min/max Width and Height except in the case that explicitWidth or explicitHeight are specified.
    - Change default maxWidth for RichText and SimpleText to 160 to match RET.  Previously it was 10000.  This is used for
    text with toFit lineBreaks if a width isn't specified.
    QA Notes: 12 or so TextGraphic tests fail because of the new default maxWidth.
    Doc Notes:SDK-22014, SDK-21837
    Reviewers: Gordon
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-22014
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-21837
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/RichEditableText.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/GraphicEleme nt.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/RichEditable TextContainerManager.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/TextGraphicE lement.as
    Added Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/RichEditable TextEditManager.as

    You have used elements like header, footer, footer1 and nav without using the correct DOCTYPE declaration. Replace the first line of your code with
    <!doctype html>
    Also have a look here for other problems http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fhome.surewest.net%2Fstorytales%2F test%2Fforposting.html
    After the above has been fixed, please come back here to fix the remaining problem(s)
    Gramps

  • Got problems with iOS7 and home sharing

    Got problems with iOS7 and home sharing music. How do you home share music now. I don't have a airplay button either. It all work fine until I updated

    I too am haing the same problem.
    Oh i have an iphone 4 by the way - if this helps.
    I have updated the itunes to 11 point something (latest as of 19th Sept '13) and still not joy.
    My phone sees the network, then when i try to connect to it in the "Sharing" spot in music, it gives me the rotating icon and then i get "Unable to Home Share at this time".
    I had this problem with the ios 6, which was log out of you apple account, and then turn off the phone -this was supposed to clear all the history and old connection details etc.
    Then restart the phone and re-log into itunes account.
    As i say - that worked last time, but this time, i have no idea what is going on.
    I am looking at reverting back to the ios 6, and waiting for ios 7.1 which to be honest - wont be long away with the amount of issues people are having.

Maybe you are looking for