Problem with replication agreement

Hi All,
I am trying to setup a replication agreement within the version 5.1 console. I am using a multi-master model. I have run into a snag in that section where I need to enter the Consumer and the Connection->Simple Authentication. For some reason after I enter in the proper information the next button is still 'greyed' out.
Is this an indication that something is not right?
Thank you for any help/information.

Please ignore this post. I was able to sort my way through this porblem only to find another involving permissions.

Similar Messages

  • Problem with Rebate agreement

    We have a problem with Rebate agreement settlement.
    Generally when the finall settlement of Rebate is completed ( with status D - D means final settlement ), the liability should be zero. However, after we made final settlement, still some amount is showing as liability when we looked at the sales volume of the rebate agreement.
    Please help us to fix the issue.
    Thanks in advance for the help.

    Hello,
    Please review the Note 392683.
    Regards,
    Raghavendra YN

  • Problem with replication based on materialized view

    Problem with replication based on materialized view...
    Given:
    1. Source: S-1
    2. Targets: T-1, T-2
    3. DB links: from T-1 to S-1, from T-2 to S-1
    Required replicate table TBL on S-1 to T-1, T-2 via db links.
    On S-1 was created materialized view log with PK on TBL. On T-1, T-2 were created mat.views as "on prebuilt table refresh fast on demand". In case of get "ORA-12034: materialized view log younger than last refresh" or initial load - perform complete refresh. Initial load on T-1 takes about 1 hour, on T-2 - about 12 hours. Refresh is executed via job with minutely interval. If refresh is running then it is not performed.
    Problem: after initial load on T-1 performs fast refresh, but on T-2 raised ORA-12034 and complete performs again.
    What's wrong?

    34MCA2K2, Google lover?
    I confess perhaps I gave a little info.
    View log was created before MV.
    It was the first initial load.
    No refresh failed.
    No DDL.
    No purge log.
    Not warehouse.
    There is no such behavior for MVs on another sites.
    P.S. I ask help someone who knows what's wrong or who faced with it or can me  follow by usefull link.
    P.P.S. It's a pity that there is no button "Useless answer"

  • Problem with replication

    Hello,
    I receive a java.sql.SQLException : ORA-02289
    while processing a replication between the
    Palm and Oracle 8i server.
    The http.bat's log is following :
    log3: Establishing connection as mt/mt
    log3: OWNER IS NOT A CLIENT
    log3: SELECT "mt"."TID$$".NEXTVAL FROM DUAL
    log3: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-02289: sequence does not exist
    null

    this is the log:
    [13/Apr/2010:17:04:36 -0400] - ERROR<8318> - Repl. Transport - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - [S] Bind failed with response: Failed to bind to remote (900).
    [13/Apr/2010:17:04:36 -0400] - ERROR<8228> - Total Protocol - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Bind error for agreement : cn=http://l-966yhd1.na.entroot.biz:389,cn=replica,cn=dc=na\,dc=entroot\,dc=biz,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
    [13/Apr/2010:17:04:43 -0400] - INFORMATION - NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Could not send consumer http://L-966YHD1.na.entroot.biz:389 the bind request
    [13/Apr/2010:17:04:43 -0400] - INFORMATION - NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Failed to connect to replication consumer http://L-966YHD1.na.entroot.biz:389
    [13/Apr/2010:17:04:43 -0400] - ERROR<8318> - Repl. Transport - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - [S] Bind failed with response: Failed to bind to remote (900).
    pelase advice

  • Problem with sender agreement in rfc

    My scenary is RFC -> XI -> FILE.
    I created one message interface with atribute asyncronous and output message the rfc.
    I created one interface mapping and message mapping
    In integration directory I created one chanel of comunication,the receiver determination, the interface determination, the receiver agreement and the sender agreement. In the sender agreement in interface I put the same name of message interface and then I activated all.
    When i execute the rfc i have one dump. This dump is "senderAgreement not found: lookup of binding via CPA-cache". But i declarated and activated the sender agreement.
    Somebody knows the problem.
    Thank's for all.

    Hi Antonio,
               A few things that you should know:
    1) You need not create a message interface for RFC, as RFC iself is an interface.
    2) You need to create one inbound message interface for file message.
    3) You will need two message mapping, one for request message and one for response message in case yours is a synchronous scenario. But only one message mapping (request) in case of asynchronous scenario.
    4)One interface mapping both for sync and async scenario.
    In Integration Directory:
    1) 2 communication channels: sender RFC and receiver File.
    2) 1 Receiver determination, interface determination and sender aggrement.
    Regards,
    Ashish

  • Problem with Sender Agreement for EDI File to Idoc scenario

    I'm configuring PI for EDI with Seeburger Adapter (Calling as a Module) and I'm having an issue with the Sender Agreement using File Adapter.
    Process used is File to IDOC. EDI data will be picked up from VAN (Using existing FTP process rather than using Seeburger FTP) and stored in a folder which is being accessed by PI  to send to R/3 to create orders.
    All my inbound EDI will be stored in same folder which should be picked up by XI and distribute the same depending upon the respective scenario's in ID and respective mapping/config in IR.
    The whole process IR & ID works fine and also creates Idoc in R/3, if I configure for one customer for EDI 850, but when I try to configure for second customer for same EDI 850 having same ANSIX12 version (V4010) as previous customer, I get stuck at the Sender Agreement part for this second customer because I use the same CC for File read for both the customers (Scenarios) and since there is a limitation with File Adapter "sender channel must not be assigned to more than one sender agreement ".
    How can I create the Sender Agreement using the same CC for my other scenario?
    I tried creating multiple CC for different scenario but when I place a test file for customer A, I see that its being picked up by both CC's.
    Pl Advise.
    Thanks!
    PSR

    You need to configure splitter as module in sender file adapter (classifier->bic->splitter) as well as define a message splitter(with partner number and Seeburger mapping) in Seeburger workbench.
    Thank you for the reply Aamir,
    Do you have any document which can guide me through the process?
    Does Seeburger Workbench play any role here? because I'm not using See FTP adapter to connect to my VAN. We get the data from the VAN using FTP process but not using See FTP. I'm using BIC to generate an XSD and SDA file, rest everything is in XI using File to idoc and IDOC to file process.
    Thx
    PSR

  • Problem with sender agreement

    Hi,
    We are trying to send a file from the file system (using file channel) to XI. However we are getting the error as " No suitable sender agreement" found error in the communication channel monitoring in RWB. However the sender agreement is very much there and is activated also.
    Any idea on this ?
    Regards
    Ganesh

    Hi,
    try creating your scenario with a integration directory wizard
    it will make sure that everything is correct
    Regards,
    michal
    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

  • Problem with Rebate Agreement Sales Volume

    Hi,
    I executed the rebate recalculation via SDBONT06 for a total of 93 agreements on 04.08.2014 and therefore the sales volume was updated and there was no message in VBO3 as well.
    But today when i am checking the agreements all of them are showing message "Sales Volume is not Current"
    I have gone through all the threads on SCN for this.
    there have not been any changes in payer, sales org, agreement or agreement conditions.
    I dont see any customizing also changed.
    Please help asap as to what can be the reason for this message all of a sudden.
    Regards,
    Aayush Jain
    SAP SD Consultant

    Hi Aayush
    When you rebuild the rebate index table VBOX all agreement conditions will be set to retroactive again. I guess someone has run RV15B001 on your system in the meantime ? 
    The "Sales Volume is not current" message is issued when the rebate condition is flagged as retroactive (KONP-KSPAE) SDBONT06 resets that when it has completed a successful update
    So just run SDBONT06 again, all of you 93 agreements are updated so the report will only reset the KONP-KSPAE field on the conditions in that case.
    Hope it helps you further
    Kind regards
    Brian

  • Problems with license agreement

    I've download a trial version for adobe acrotal 9 pro extended. I've installed in my computer and when I try to run this program, the license agreement appears, I accept and the program shutdown

    Thanks.
    Finally, my Acrobat 9 pro works. I changed read/write permissions on "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Adobe PCD".

  • Problems with Target service agreement

    Problems with Target service agreement to repair my ipod nano. I have gone to the BBB. Who can I contact at Apple to let them know the poor service that Target gave with a Apple product?

    Apple Customer Relations (800) 767-2775

  • Problem with MM Scheduling Agreement Inbound Delivery

    Hello all Gurus,
    I have a problem with inbound delivery. Whenever I am trying to create inbound delivery in VL31N with the total open quantity of MM scheduling agreement, I am getting a warning message as below
    "Notified quantity less than goods receipt quantity".
    If the quantity was less then 80, then I should get this message.
    But the total open quantity in MM Scheduling agreement in ME38 is 80. So when I am creating the inbound delivery for 80, why system is giving me this warning message????
    Kindly advise whether we have to maintain any settings anywhere or am I missing something here.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Umakanth.

    Got the result.

  • Problem with File Based replication in Weblogic Express 10

    Hi,
              We have Web application (exploded war) file deployed on Weblogic Express 10, to a Cluster of three Managed Servers (all three on different physical machines).
              We are using File based session persistance in weblogic.xml
              We have a shared location for all the three servers where we will be sharing the Session data.
              When we start the application, its works fine and is very fast, but after sometime the application slows down.
              Troubleshooting the Issue we found that its a problem with file based replication. By using File based replication every user session is stored in form of directory inside shared directory. So after sometime thousands of directories are created inside the shared directory where the session information is stored. So when we access the application, its waiting for lot of time with Message Session Monitor .... (this is because its browsing through the shared session storage directory for lot of time for session information as it has lot of directories) and finally after a long time like 10 mins we get the Application Home Page.
              When we clean up all the saved sessions inside shared directory, the application works fine, But we will see the same sometime later may be after 3 or 4 hours when the shared session directory has lot of session information stored in it.
              Is there a way to clean up the saved session information on file system as soon as that user session is closed by using file based replication.
              We cannot used Inmemory replication as our Appl doesnt support it.
              Please advice as it is a major show stopper in our Production Mirror env.
              Weblogic Consultant

    It is possible to reduce number of live session by configuring very low timeout-secs weblogic.xml. Default is 60 minutes.
              More details are here..
              http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs100/webapp/weblogic_xml.html#wp1071982
              Jayesh
              Yagna Sys

  • Replication problems with slow ( 20kB/s line)

    Yesterday we noticed on our production database that replication did not run anymore because of an error in one record. This forced us to re-iniitalize the subscription. Maybe this is exactly what we should not have done but we did . The result was that
    production stopped because of the first part of the replication to dump all the tables and make new empty ones. The problem is that this does not seem a good idea for a slow connection between 2 machines. Better would be that we could just restart the replication
    from a backup but as far as I know this is not possible.
    So my question is now what can we do to speed up the replication if there is no way that we can improve the line quality. (One server is in NL and the other in CN, and as everybody know there is the great big firewall in Bejing which controlls all the internet
    traffic. )
    Is there a way to prevent replication from emptying the tables and fill them again.
    Many thanks Peter Kaldenberg

    I know that probably there is a problem with our firewalls but the fact remains that we are facing with slow connections so I ques what can we do at SQL level to speed replication or better not to have to do bulk copy over the net. In-fact why does SQL not
    use some kind of delta protocol. When only data is involved this should work. Of course when the layout of tables has been changed then it makes sense the tables has to be rebuild but not for data.
    Maybe a solution could be to use check-sum checking and only update these records which are different and of course add the missing once.
    Additional why does the replication not give information how far the bulk copy is at least then the user knows its still working. Now what ever setting I change after 10 min the replication does not give any useful information. Which results in that the
    user is thinking that the replication does not work anymore.
    What about 3rd party replication tools are they any better?
    Peter

  • TS1424 Can't download, buy or even update apps / A message advising a new Itunes terms and conditions is coming up even after my agree and acceptance... Is there a problem in Itunes? same problem with deferent devises

    A message advising a new Itunes terms and conditions is pop up even after my agree and acceptance... Is there a problem in Itunes? same problem with deferent devices
    Just Can't download, buy or even update apps...

    I use only one Apple ID and only one ID. I did have to change the password at one point but I had no issues at all with updating apps after I changed the password.
    If you can download new apps with the ID that you changed the password for, I would think that you will be able to update apps associated with that ID as well.
    Did you try restarting the iPad after signing out of the one account and then sign in to the other account/accounts?

  • I have a problem with IOS 7 when I am installing app on App Store. I must read and accept new terms and condition. However, I read all new terms that I don't see Agree button to accept. Can you check help me this problem?

    I have a problem with IOS 7 when I am installing app on App Store. I must read and accept new terms and condition. However, I read all new terms but I still don't see "Agree" button to accept. Can you check help me this problem?

    If it says 'Open' in the App Store, then it's on your device.  What happens when you press the 'Open' button in the App Store?
    The App is on your phone, somewhere.  Use Spotlight to find it, or you can reset your Home Screen layout, and then you'll definitely find it.

Maybe you are looking for