Problem with tax condition in TAXINN

Hi,
This is related to India.
We are using TAXINN tax procedure. We maintained the following steps:
1.all conditions in the procedure JMOP, JMX1, JECP,JEX1, JSEP, JHX1, JVRD assigned account keys for the required accordingly.
2.made tax codes V0 , V1
3.assigned accounting keys to G/L accounts in OB40
4.made condition record with Plant / vendor/ material combination for all above conditions.
When I am making PO by entering all values including tax codes I could not able to see values flowing for JEX1 (Set off condition for Ecess), JHX1(Set off condition for Sec Ecess), JVRD (VAT RM Deductible condition). When I go to Analysis Pricing and check for these conditions values are appearing for those conditions & for those combinations. But I got message Condition record exists, but has not been reset . Because of this value is not flowing.
Can any body throw light on this.
Regards

Hi Friends,
I solved this problem by doing / adding following customization:
SPRO.. Logistics genaral .. Tax on goods movement... India.. Basic settings ..Determination of excise duty.. condition based excise determation.. classify condition types
Maintained for the following :
TAXINN .. JHX1.. AT1 set off condition Total
TAXINN... JEX1... Ecss set oof condition Total
TAXINN... JVRD .. A/P RM VAT Deductible
Then assign Tax codes to Compnay codes in
SPRO.. Logistics genaral .. Tax on goods movement... India.. Basic settings ..Determination of excise duty.. condition based excise determation..
Regards

Similar Messages

Problem with or condition in if statement

Dear Oracle experts,
I have a strange problem with Oracle 10g1R1 :
The script below should normally write the value 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10 into my table.
But itwrites all the values from 1 to 10 into my table.
Only if I use only one condition without the 'or' the
if condition is successful.
Is this a normal behaviour of the database ?
If yes, then why ?
Best regards,
Daniel Wetzler
create table messages (results varchar2(30));
declare
var1 number;
begin
for i in 1..10 loop
dbms_output.put_line(i);
if (i != 6) or (i != 8)
then
insert into messages results values (i);
end if;
end loop;
commit;
end;
/

You want to use AND for that condition, not OR
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..10 loop
3     if (i != 6) and (i != 8)
4     then
5        dbms_output.put_line(i);
6     end if;
7 end loop;
8 end;
9 /
1
2
3
4
5
7
9
10

Probleme with price condition

hello,
I have just created a info record for vendor 201031 and purchasing org Z001 and material 200000001 with price conditions (PB00, RA00, FRB1).
when I have execute tcode MEKE (condition by vendor) for vendor 201031and the purchasing org Z001 I had this message: No condition types with access sequences found.
thank you to explain it to me what is this problem ? I owe acivre something? should I update vendor data ?
NB: if you have examples of document step by step for price conditions, thank you to send it to me on: [email protected]
in advance thank you .
Said

Hi ,
Pl go through this link.
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/steps-for-mm-pricing-procedures.htm
Thanks
Dipak

Problem with Guard Condition (Fields Disabling)

Hi All
I have a screen where I am creating a notification... so I enter all my fields and data as below:
If ALL fields are filled out then the call to my RFC will create the notification and pass back a notification number (EX_QMNUM)
I then pass back EX_QMNUM to the input of my READ_S1 RFC. Since we have a custom table attached I thought it was best to retrieve the latest data from the database after point of save.
However if they don't fill in the necessary criteria then I pop up an error (EG. Please fill in customer number). I put a GUARD CONDITION on the call back to the READ_S1 RFC. The guard seems to work as my breakpoint/RFC does not get hit... however it then CLEARS my fields and DISABLES everything. This is what it looks like after the save (with guard condition in place). This means I lose all my data and no save occurs.
What am I doing wrong here? Is this a bug with the guard condition?
Guard Condition (which seems to be working apart from the fact it disables my RGA fields)
I'm not completely sure about IF conditions so let me know if this is wrong?

Hi Brad,
Thanks for the input, I have tried this now.
1. In the case the guard evaluates to "false", I experience the fields being blank, but not grayed out. So the user is able to refill the input and submit. This means something else in your model causes the "grayed out" behavior.
2. In general, in case you know the conditions to valid input in the client side, you could model this way:
Valid input => the data services run. example guard to service: =ISNULL(@customer)==false
Invalid input => the popup shows. example guard to popup: =ISNULL(in1@customer)==true
3. Is it possible in your case to validate the input before running the first query? This will enable to use the Validation feature as in Input Validation. If possible it's the best way in terms of user experience, in my opinion.
Thanks,
Udi

Problem with multiple condition type for VAT &CST

Hi,Gurus,
pl. suggest the procedure for the following problem.we configured seperate pricing procedures for our product material and scrap material.We have configured same condition types for VAT(ie.condition type:ZVAT) and CST(cond type:ZCST), in both pricing procedures. Now We want to maintain seperate condition types for VAT and CST for pricing procedure for Product material and Scrap material. I have created two new condition types for scrap sales ZSCT- cst for scrap and ZSVT-vat for scrap by copying the same from existing conditions ZCST & ZVAT, and the same is included in the scrap pricing procedure. And also maintained OB40,OBCN,OVK1,OVK3,OVK4, FTXP,FV11 and VK11.
now I am facing the following problems.
1. while creating the Material master & customer master, in tax category sub screen all conditions i.e. conditions defined for product material( ZCST,ZVAT) and defined for scrap material (ZSCT, ZSVT) displaying and these are compulsory fields.
2. While creating the sale order for scrap material, system is considering the TAX classes from ZVAT/ ZCST (defined for product material) and taking the condition value from the condition type ZSVT/ ZSCT with the TAX class values of ZVAT/ZCST.
Now I would like to know is there any procedure to assign the Material type and Customer Account group to Tax category.
Thanks & Regards
sam

Hello Sam,
The Access Sequence Assigned to your New Condition types ie, ZSCT and ZSVT are same as the Previous Condition type ZVAT and ZCST.
After Adding new condition type in the Tax category in the Masters you have to take care of the Sequence of the Condition type.
If ZSCT and ZSVT is on the 3rd and 4th number in the masters the Condition table you are using in the access sequence should have fields Taxclassification3-Customer and taxclassification3- material. For ZSCT
Likewise Taxclassification4-Customer and taxclassification4- material. For ZSVT
Please add New Condition table in the access sequence with the required Field
And next when you are maintaining the condition record for say ZSCT you will have to maintain condition record for the condition table which has Taxclassification3-Customer and taxclassification3.
In Document the values will be flown correctly after changing this.
Hope I have Solved your Query.
If any Doubt please revert.
Regards,
Rohit Dongre

Problem with pricing condition type in case of proforma invoicing

Hello All,
the problem is related to a pricing condition type in case of proforma invoice where the details are as follows -
Name of Condition Type - ZADC - Add 10% on Cost                                         Access seq.   Z038 Diff
                                                                                Plus/minus    A Positive
Cond. class - A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type - A Percentage
Cond.category - Blank
Manual entries      D Not possible to process manually
Amount / Percent - Checked
Item Condition - checked
Scale Basis - Quantity
Currency Conversion - Checked
Quantity Conversion - Checked
This condition type has been kept as statistical in the pricing procedure. Still in the proforma invoice the condition type is not getting reflected automatically , whenever I am updating with " carry out new pricing " option the condition type is getting populated.In case of other commercial invoices this very condition type is getting populated automatically without any updates.Along with this point to be noted is that the Condition type in which the actual costi is captured has been kept active.
What more needs to be configured or what are the changes to be done to populate the condition type automatically as statistical during the time of proforma invoicing?
Thanks & Regards
Priyanka Mitra

Hi,
Kindly do the pricing analysis and check whether you have the following error such as
Inactive condition type because of subsequent price,
Regards,
Ravi

Problems with the condition for a switch in our IntegrationProcess

Hi,
we're relatively new in using the XI-IntegrationBuilder and we have a small problem.
We try to define a switch-condition to perform two different Transformations depending on a specific value of a message element.
The condition looks like this:
(IncomingRequest./p1:MT_XI_REQUEST/status = donormal)
Both 'sides' of the condition are of the type (xsd:string).
But it seems the condition is not working in the right way.
It always uses the Transformation 'merge' (pls see image of IntegrationProcess->here the Transformation is shown as 'me').
<a href="http://www.edwebservice.de/uploads/a1a956a10f.jpg">Image of sampleprocess</a> (this is only a testprocess to show what we want to do)
For testing we already run the process without the switch (making it linear), by using each transformation occurring in the switch on its own. Both tests worked well and returned the expected different values. But as mentioned above when we're using both Transformations in the switch, always the Transformation 'merge' is performed.
It does NOT matter if the Transformation 'merge' is placed in the 'if' or in the 'otherwise' branch. It does NOT matter what value (true/false) the condition should return.
Maybe its a basic desing-problem of our process?
<b>Any suggestions will be appreciated</b>
Regards!
Georg
Our systemenvironment:
Runtime
Java version:1.5.0_01
Java vendor:Sun Microsystems Inc.
Version
Service pack:15
Release:NW04_15_REL
Latest change:15767
Sync time:200603080654
ps: we already checked the OSS note 890760 for resolution. but this didn't solve the problem.

Hi!
@Peter:
1) the namspaces are the same. we ckecked it already.
2) status is an element NOT an attribute
3) it is the same value (no blanks etc.)
we will try to run XI with 1.4.2
@Udo:
We know how to use XPath a litte bit and were to customize an expression in the conditioneditor. We only thought that you could mean a 'special functionality' of XI
Thanks for your ideas so far!
Regards!
Georg

Problem with pricing condition table - Urgent

Hello,
I have created a new condition table ' 627 ' in ECC, and i want to transfer the condition table to CRM.
I did initial download for objects "DNL_CUST_CND" , "DNL_CUST_PRC".
how can i transfer the condition table.
Full points will be rewarded.
regards
yaswanth.k

Hi,
You have to create the new Adapter Object in R3AC5 for the newly created conditional table 627.
Take the standard adapter like DNL_COND_A011.
create the new Z adapter like ZDNL_COND_A627.
In the table/structure tab replace the A011 by A627 and do remaining settings as it is.
now u can carry out the inital download.
i think this will solve your problem.
Let me know the status?

Problem with TAX-Line using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST

the markup texts dont work...

Hi Carlos,
OMG sometimes the solutions are too simple for one to see
THAT WAS THE PROBLEM...I had forgotten the APPEND
Now I have one last question/problem
I Think everything will work fine now - the only thing is, I get the error message when calling the BAPI that the balance of the invoice is not zero.
Is there a way to debug and see what amounts the BAPI would save to the TABLES so I can exactly see on what Invocie position I have to adjust the amount so the balance is equal because right now I just see the problem, but I don't now if the TAX-calculation is wrong or the customer-line-amounts...I hope you understand what I mean
cheers,
jazy

Problems with template condition

Hi,
I would like to set a condition for a report template by the column header content.
I have tried the following statement:
instr(#COLUMN_HEADER#, 'TITLE')>0
and I have got the error message:
"ORA-06550: PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "#" when expecting one of the following: ( ) - + ..."
Do you have any idea why it doesn't work?
Thx!

In plain english :-) :
I want to create a report with news on the start page of a htmldb application. So I have created a table with 3 columns: DATE, HEADLINE, CONTENT. Now I want to create a template for the layout. Every record in the news table should be showed in the following way:
HEADLINE DATE
CONTENT
My idea was to create 3 conditional templates for every column of a record depending on the column's name. For example a new table row (<tr>) for the content column etc.
The column template conditions based on PL/SQL expression (e.g. instr(#COLUMN_HEADER#, 'CONTENT')>0) don't work... :-(

Rounding problem with statistical condition (Hint 80183)

Dear all,
we have implemented OSS hint 80183 with the variant 2. As long as a price is valid in the calculation scheme (e.g. EK01), the rounding variance in NETP is calculated correctly. If the price is not contained in the scheme, the system uses the condition VPRS (although statistical) for the rounding (see variable NETTOPREIS in formula 019).
if nettopreis is initial.
nettopreis = ykbetr * 100. "in currency YWAERS
endif.
YKBETR contains the value of VPRS, although it is statistical.
If we remove VPRS from the scheme, we get error V1208 'Error in converting exchange rate from __ to EUR'.
How can we prevent that the system calculates the rounding variance with the statistical conditions?
Thanks in advance
Stefan

solved in exit

Problem with building conditional display items

Dear All,
Please help as I am using APEX for the first time.
This my requirement during form dispaly in tabular format. There is one display item QA_TIER(not a database item). This item value is computed based on the condition below.
I created a display item with :
Source Used : Always, replacing any existing value in the session state
Source Type: PL/SQL Expression or Function
Source value or expression:
begin
if 2<=(select decode(&Leg_Req,'Y',1,0)+decode(&maj_funct_chg,'Y',1,0)+
decode(&maj_tech_chg,'Y',1,0)+decode(&maj_ui_chg,'Y',1,0)+
decode(&maj_def_met,'Y',1,0) from dual) then
if &Customer_Priority = 1 then
return 1;
else
return &Customer_Priority-1;
end if;
ELSE return &Customer_Priority; end if;
end;
Note : All reference with '&' are the actual field name.
When running the page i get the following error message:
ORA-06550: line 2, column 23: PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "&" when expecting one of the following: ( ) - + case mod new not null others select table avg count current exists max m ORA-06550: line 2, column 48: PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "&" when expecting one of the following: ( ) - + case mod new not null others table avg count
     Error      ERR-1020 Error in PLSQL item processing (function).
Can anybody help me with building the display item with conditions as show above.
Thanks in advance

hi thanks for the help.
I tried this time source type SQL Query:
with both suggestions
1.
select (case when
2<=to_number((select decode(v(Leg_Req),'Y',1,0)+decode(v(maj_funct_chg),'Y',1,0)+
decode(v(maj_tech_chg),'Y',1,0)+decode(v(maj_ui_chg),'Y',1,0)+
decode(v(maj_def_met),'Y',1,0) from dual)) then
(select decode(v(Customer_Priority),1,1,v(Customer_Priority)-1) from dual)
ELSE v(Customer_Priority) end) from dual
Result:
ORA-00904: "CUSTOMER_PRIORITY": invalid identifier
     Error      ERR-1019 Error computing item default value: page=2 name=QA_TIER.
2.
select (case when
2<=to_number((select decode(:Leg_Req,'Y',1,0)+decode(:maj_funct_chg,'Y',1,0)+
decode(:maj_tech_chg,'Y',1,0)+decode(:maj_ui_chg,'Y',1,0)+
decode(:maj_def_met,'Y',1,0) from dual)) then
(select decode(:Customer_Priority,1,1,:Customer_Priority-1) from dual)
ELSE :Customer_Priority end) from dual
Result:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got CHAR
     Error      ERR-1019 Error computing item default value: page=2 name=QA_TIER.
Both didn't work.

Problem with tax calculate tax in BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST

Hi ,
I am using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST to post financial details to G/L accounts .
The BAPi has created the acoounting document with the data I have passed,but I am
unable to calculate tax(i.e.When i click Calculate tax check box in FB01 ,a tax line item gets created,)
but the same is not happening when i use the BAPI.
Can any one throw light on the data that needs to be passed to the TABLE ACCOUNTTAX and how the
corresponding changes that needs to be done to TABLE CURRENCYAMOUNT inorder to create this new line item.
i have also had a look at the OSS notes but still am facing issue .
Pl help!!I

Hi
This is my code to fill ACCOUNTTAX:
LOOP AT GL_ITEM INTO W_GL_ITEM .
    ITEMNO_ACC = ITEMNO_ACC + 1.
    IF W_GL_ITEM-VAT = SPACE.
      ACCOUNTGL-ITEMNO_ACC = ITEMNO_ACC.
      ACCOUNTGL-GL_ACCOUNT = W_GL_ITEM-HKONT.
      ACCOUNTGL-BUS_AREA   = W_GL_ITEM-GSBER.
      ACCOUNTGL-TAX_CODE   = W_GL_ITEM-MWSKZ.
      ACCOUNTGL-PROFIT_CTR = W_GL_ITEM-PRCTR.
      ACCOUNTGL-COSTCENTER = W_GL_ITEM-KOSTL.
      ACCOUNTGL-REF_KEY_2 = W_GL_ITEM-XREF2.
      ACCOUNTGL-REF_KEY_3 = W_GL_ITEM-XREF3.
      APPEND ACCOUNTGL.
      PERFORM FILL_AMOUNT USING W_GL_ITEM-WRBTR 0.
      CLEAR ZSDFI_BAPI_EXTENSION.
      ZSDFI_BAPI_EXTENSION-ITEMNO_ACC = ITEMNO_ACC.
      ZSDFI_BAPI_EXTENSION-ZLIFNR     = W_GL_ITEM-ZLIFNR.
      ZSDFI_BAPI_EXTENSION-CANALE     = W_GL_ITEM-ZJ_3AKVGR6.
      MOVE ZSDFI_BAPI_EXTENSION TO EXTENSIONS.
      APPEND EXTENSIONS.
    ELSE.
      ACCOUNTTAX-ITEMNO_ACC = ITEMNO_ACC.
      ACCOUNTTAX-TAX_CODE   = W_GL_ITEM-MWSKZ.
      ACCOUNTTAX-ACCT_KEY   = W_GL_ITEM-KOSTL.
      ACCOUNTTAX-COND_KEY   = W_GL_ITEM-KSCHL.
      ACCOUNTTAX-TAXJURCODE = W_GL_ITEM-TXJCD.
      ACCOUNTTAX-TAXJURCODE_DEEP = W_GL_ITEM-TXJCD_DEEP.
      ACCOUNTTAX-TAXJURCODE_LEVEL = W_GL_ITEM-TXJLV.
      APPEND ACCOUNTTAX.
      PERFORM FILL_AMOUNT USING W_GL_ITEM-WRBTR W_GL_ITEM-BASE.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
FORM FILL_AMOUNT USING    P_AMOUNT P_BASE.
CURRENCYAMOUNT-ITEMNO_ACC = ITEMNO_ACC.
CURRENCYAMOUNT-CURR_TYPE = '00'.
CURRENCYAMOUNT-CURRENCY   = T001-WAERS.
CURRENCYAMOUNT-AMT_DOCCUR = - P_AMOUNT.
CURRENCYAMOUNT-AMT_BASE   = - P_BASE.
APPEND CURRENCYAMOUNT.
ENDFORM.                    " FILL_AMOUNT
The tax data are picked by fm CALCULATE_TAX_FROM_NET_AMOUNT
REFRESH T_MWDAT.
      CALL FUNCTION 'CALCULATE_TAX_FROM_NET_AMOUNT'
           EXPORTING
                I_BUKRS           = BUK_TO
                I_MWSKZ           = T_BASE-MWSKZ_OUT
                I_WAERS           = _BKPF-WAERS
                I_WRBTR           = T_BASE-WRBTR
           TABLES
                T_MWDAT           = T_MWDAT
           EXCEPTIONS
                BUKRS_NOT_FOUND   = 1
                COUNTRY_NOT_FOUND = 2
                MWSKZ_NOT_DEFINED = 3
                MWSKZ_NOT_VALID   = 4
                KTOSL_NOT_FOUND   = 5
                KALSM_NOT_FOUND   = 6
                PARAMETER_ERROR   = 7
                KNUMH_NOT_FOUND   = 8
                KSCHL_NOT_FOUND   = 9
                UNKNOWN_ERROR     = 10
                ACCOUNT_NOT_FOUND = 11
                TXJCD_NOT_VALID   = 12
                OTHERS            = 13.
      IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
        MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
                WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
      ELSE.
        LOOP AT T_MWDAT.
          CLEAR W_GL_ITEM.
          W_GL_ITEM-HKONT   = T_MWDAT-HKONT.
          W_GL_ITEM-MWSKZ   = T_BASE-MWSKZ_OUT.
          IF T_BASE-KBETR = T_MWDAT-KBETR.
            W_GL_ITEM-WRBTR   = T_BASE-FWSTE.
          ELSE.
            W_GL_ITEM-WRBTR   = T_MWDAT-WMWST.
          ENDIF.
          W_GL_ITEM-VAT   = 'X'.
          W_GL_ITEM-KTOSL = T_MWDAT-KTOSL.
          W_GL_ITEM-TXJCD = T_MWDAT-TXJCD.
          W_GL_ITEM-KSCHL = T_MWDAT-KSCHL.
          W_GL_ITEM-TXJCD_DEEP = T_MWDAT-TXJCD_DEEP.
          W_GL_ITEM-TXJLV = T_MWDAT-TXJLV.
          W_GL_ITEM-BASE = T_BASE-WRBTR.
I hope it can help you
Max

Problem with "Tax Code" and "Calculate tax automatically" fields

Hi again.
I have made a program which posts account documents through the BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST function module, and, since there were some fields which weren't available for me to fill having the FM by itslef, I have implemented the AC_DOCUMENT BAdI.
All document data is provided by means of an SAP XI interface, through a Z IDoc.
When I create the Account Receivable (and/or Payable) structure, I fill, through the BAdI, the BKPF-XMWST (Calculate tax automatically) and BSEG-MWSKZ (Tax code) fields. However, even the resulting posted document does have the Tax Information fields completed (the ones in the BSET table), the BAPI doesn't create the tax position automatically (just like the FB01 or FB60 transactions do). Note that the amounts are sent in their gross value by the interface (that's why the debit and credit sides remain consistent and the document is posted correctly).
How can I have that position created? Is there a function module which I can call or something?
Thanks a lot in advance.

Hi
I only use the fm CALCULATE_TAX_FROM_NET_AMOUNT or CALCULATE_TAX_FROM_GROSSAMOUNT in order to get all information I need to transfer to the BAPI. Both fms return the data by table parameter T_MWDAT.
U can read this table and get all information u need, these code is from my old program, I hope it can help you:
- Calculate tax data:
CALL FUNCTION 'CALCULATE_TAX_FROM_NET_AMOUNT'
        EXPORTING
          I_BUKRS           = BUK_TO
          I_MWSKZ           = T_BASE-MWSKZ_OUT
          I_WAERS           = _BKPF-WAERS
          I_WRBTR           = T_BASE-WRBTR
        TABLES
          T_MWDAT           = T_MWDAT
       EXCPTIONS.
      IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
      ELSE.
* Load tax item
        LOOP AT T_MWDAT.
          CLEAR W_GL_ITEM.
          W_GL_ITEM-HKONT   = T_MWDAT-HKONT.
          W_GL_ITEM-MWSKZ   = T_BASE-MWSKZ_OUT.
          IF T_BASE-KBETR = T_MWDAT-KBETR.
            W_GL_ITEM-WRBTR   = T_BASE-FWSTE.
          ELSE.
            W_GL_ITEM-WRBTR   = T_MWDAT-WMWST.
          ENDIF.
          W_GL_ITEM-IVA   = 'X'.
          W_GL_ITEM-KTOSL = T_MWDAT-KTOSL.
          W_GL_ITEM-TXJCD = T_MWDAT-TXJCD.
          W_GL_ITEM-KSCHL = T_MWDAT-KSCHL.
          W_GL_ITEM-TXJCD_DEEP = T_MWDAT-TXJCD_DEEP.
          W_GL_ITEM-TXJLV = T_MWDAT-TXJLV.
          W_GL_ITEM-BASE = T_BASE-WRBTR.
          COLLECT W_GL_ITEM INTO GL_ITEM.
- Append GL or Tax item for the BAPI
LOOP AT GL_ITEM INTO W_GL_ITEM .
    ITEMNO_ACC = ITEMNO_ACC + 1.
    IF W_GL_ITEM-IVA = SPACE.
* GL item
    ELSE.
* Tax item
      ACCOUNTTAX-ITEMNO_ACC = ITEMNO_ACC.
      ACCOUNTTAX-TAX_CODE   = W_GL_ITEM-MWSKZ.
      ACCOUNTTAX-ACCT_KEY   = W_GL_ITEM-KOSTL.
      ACCOUNTTAX-COND_KEY   = W_GL_ITEM-KSCHL.
      ACCOUNTTAX-TAXJURCODE = W_GL_ITEM-TXJCD.
      ACCOUNTTAX-TAXJURCODE_DEEP = W_GL_ITEM-TXJCD_DEEP.
      ACCOUNTTAX-TAXJURCODE_LEVEL = W_GL_ITEM-TXJLV.
      APPEND ACCOUNTTAX.
      PERFORM FILL_AMOUNT USING W_GL_ITEM-WRBTR W_GL_ITEM-BASE.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Max
Edited by: max bianchi on Nov 25, 2009 7:43 PM

Problem with Branch Conditions (Request = Expression 1)

Application Express 3.1.0.00.32
I've looked around on the internet and couldn't find anything to differ from what I thought I was doing correctly.
The issue I am having is that I have 4 push buttons (2 on top and 2 on bottom) that when pressed, should redirect to the same page. For the branch condition, I set the type as Request = Expression 1 and placed the values that the buttons submit as in the expression 1 field.
For the push button pressed, I do not have a button selected.
In testing whenever I press a button, the following error is given:
ERR-1777: Page 4 provided no page to branch to. Please report this error to your application administrator.
Any ideas?

Hi Leland,
Check the names you have used in Expression 1.
I have just created two buttons on a page called P4_BUTTON1 and P4_BUTTON2.
My Expression 1 setting shows:
P4_BUTTON1,P4_BUTTON2and the branch works ok
Andy
ps - if you have more than one button that could control the branch, the condition should be "Request is Contained within Expression 1"
Edited by: ATD on Jan 14, 2009 5:45 PM

Problem with tax condition in TAXINN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for