Probleme with price condition

hello,
I have just created a info record for vendor 201031 and purchasing org Z001 and material 200000001 with price conditions (PB00, RA00, FRB1).
when I have execute tcode MEKE (condition by vendor) for vendor 201031and the purchasing org Z001 I had this message: No condition types with access sequences found.
thank you to explain it to me what is this problem ? I owe acivre something? should I update vendor data ?
NB: if you have examples of document step by step for price conditions, thank you to send it to me on: [email protected]
in advance thank you .
Said

Hi ,
Pl go through this link.
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/steps-for-mm-pricing-procedures.htm
Thanks
Dipak

Similar Messages

Sales doc copy control not working with price condition

Here's the situation.
For OR sales document I have Procedure ZSALES and price conditions Z001
For a QT Sales document I have Procedure ZQUOTE which does not have a Z001 condition in that procedure.
If I create an OR (with the proper customer / matieral) the Z001 populates, based on it's defined record.
If I then create another OR with reference to the original OR, the Z001 populates with no problem.
Up to now everything's fine, now here's the probem......
If I create an OR with reference to a QT, the Z001 does not populate in the OR order.I know there is no Z001 in the QT for it to copy from, but if I do [New Pricing] in the order it still does not come in.(I've tried [new Pricing] with Pricing type A..G)
I have found OSS Note 413066, but this is in reference to 46c systems. we are on ECC 6.0
any ideas ?

Hi Bill,
If PP assigned for both are different it's not going to populate field even if you are redertermining price, since it would be following the PP of Quotation (ZQUOTE), not Sales Order (ZSALES) because it's gonna copy the elements of that PP in order. Are your PP assigned are same or different?
Hope this will answer your query
Regards
SD

Problem with or condition in if statement

Dear Oracle experts,
I have a strange problem with Oracle 10g1R1 :
The script below should normally write the value 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10 into my table.
But itwrites all the values from 1 to 10 into my table.
Only if I use only one condition without the 'or' the
if condition is successful.
Is this a normal behaviour of the database ?
If yes, then why ?
Best regards,
Daniel Wetzler
create table messages (results varchar2(30));
declare
var1 number;
begin
for i in 1..10 loop
dbms_output.put_line(i);
if (i != 6) or (i != 8)
then
insert into messages results values (i);
end if;
end loop;
commit;
end;
/

You want to use AND for that condition, not OR
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..10 loop
3     if (i != 6) and (i != 8)
4     then
5        dbms_output.put_line(i);
6     end if;
7 end loop;
8 end;
9 /
1
2
3
4
5
7
9
10

INVOIC01 with Price Condition

Hi Experts,
I need to create an iDoc of Invoice Receipt (MM) that put especifics Price Conditions or make the Invoice Receipt just with "Indirect Costes", like transportation, etc.
I yet tryed to create the iDoc INVOIC01 with structure E1EDP05, but without sucessfull.
Could someone help me about it ?
Thanks in advance
Regis

Hi ,
Pl go through this link.
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/steps-for-mm-pricing-procedures.htm
Thanks
Dipak

Problem with Guard Condition (Fields Disabling)

Hi All
I have a screen where I am creating a notification... so I enter all my fields and data as below:
If ALL fields are filled out then the call to my RFC will create the notification and pass back a notification number (EX_QMNUM)
I then pass back EX_QMNUM to the input of my READ_S1 RFC. Since we have a custom table attached I thought it was best to retrieve the latest data from the database after point of save.
However if they don't fill in the necessary criteria then I pop up an error (EG. Please fill in customer number). I put a GUARD CONDITION on the call back to the READ_S1 RFC. The guard seems to work as my breakpoint/RFC does not get hit... however it then CLEARS my fields and DISABLES everything. This is what it looks like after the save (with guard condition in place). This means I lose all my data and no save occurs.
What am I doing wrong here? Is this a bug with the guard condition?
Guard Condition (which seems to be working apart from the fact it disables my RGA fields)
I'm not completely sure about IF conditions so let me know if this is wrong?

Hi Brad,
Thanks for the input, I have tried this now.
1. In the case the guard evaluates to "false", I experience the fields being blank, but not grayed out. So the user is able to refill the input and submit. This means something else in your model causes the "grayed out" behavior.
2. In general, in case you know the conditions to valid input in the client side, you could model this way:
Valid input => the data services run. example guard to service: =ISNULL(@customer)==false
Invalid input => the popup shows. example guard to popup: =ISNULL(in1@customer)==true
3. Is it possible in your case to validate the input before running the first query? This will enable to use the Validation feature as in Input Validation. If possible it's the best way in terms of user experience, in my opinion.
Thanks,
Udi

Problem with pricing condition type in case of proforma invoicing

Hello All,
the problem is related to a pricing condition type in case of proforma invoice where the details are as follows -
Name of Condition Type - ZADC - Add 10% on Cost                                         Access seq.   Z038 Diff
                                                                                Plus/minus    A Positive
Cond. class - A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type - A Percentage
Cond.category - Blank
Manual entries      D Not possible to process manually
Amount / Percent - Checked
Item Condition - checked
Scale Basis - Quantity
Currency Conversion - Checked
Quantity Conversion - Checked
This condition type has been kept as statistical in the pricing procedure. Still in the proforma invoice the condition type is not getting reflected automatically , whenever I am updating with " carry out new pricing " option the condition type is getting populated.In case of other commercial invoices this very condition type is getting populated automatically without any updates.Along with this point to be noted is that the Condition type in which the actual costi is captured has been kept active.
What more needs to be configured or what are the changes to be done to populate the condition type automatically as statistical during the time of proforma invoicing?
Thanks & Regards
Priyanka Mitra

Hi,
Kindly do the pricing analysis and check whether you have the following error such as
Inactive condition type because of subsequent price,
Regards,
Ravi

BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2 - Problem with price

Hi
I'm trying to create a Sales Document with the BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2 with SE37, i don't know what is missing, because it gives me the order number but when i call the BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT, it doesn't create the document, the result of the BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2 is next:
S V4233SALES_HEADER_IN has been processed successfully
S V4233SALES_ITEM_IN has been processed successfully
W V1555The sales document is not yet complete: Edit data
S V1311Pedido Nacional 0000281711 has been saved
I feel the problem is in the parameters i'm sending, because i'm creating a sales order with VA01, and when debugging the BAPI and VA01, comparing table XVBAP at BAPI and VA01, i have difference at XVBAP-KWMENG and XVBAP-NETWR, at the BAPI'S table i don't have data, and at the VA01 transaction i have it, i give the parameters i'm sending so maybe somebody can help me.
ORDER_HEADER_IN
DOC_TYPE
SALES_ORG
DISTR_CHAN
DIVISION
REQ_DATE_H
PURCH_DATE
INCOTERMS1
PMNTTRMS
PRICE_DATE
PURCH_NO_C
ORDER_ITEMS_IN
MATERIAL
PLANT
TARGET_QTY
TARGET_QU
INCOTERMS1
ROUTE
ORDER_PARTNERS
PARTN_ROLE
PARTN_NUMB
And that's all.
Thanks
Best Regards.
Soraya Cervantes

Soraya,
You need to pass in the Pricing COnditions via the ORDER_CONDITIONS_IN and ORDER_CONDITIONS_INX parameters.
eg.
tbl_bapicond-itm_number = '000010'.
tbl_bapicond-cond_type = 'ZP01'.
tbl_bapicond-cond_value = '100'.
append tbl_bapicond.
tbl_bapicondx-itm_number = '000010'.
tbl_bapicondx-cond_type = 'ZP01'.
tbl_bapicondx-update_flag = 'U'.
tbl_bapicondx-cond_value = 'X'.
append tbl_bapicondx.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Pat.
PS. Kindly assign Reward Points to the posts you find helpful.

Problems with the condition for a switch in our IntegrationProcess

Hi,
we're relatively new in using the XI-IntegrationBuilder and we have a small problem.
We try to define a switch-condition to perform two different Transformations depending on a specific value of a message element.
The condition looks like this:
(IncomingRequest./p1:MT_XI_REQUEST/status = donormal)
Both 'sides' of the condition are of the type (xsd:string).
But it seems the condition is not working in the right way.
It always uses the Transformation 'merge' (pls see image of IntegrationProcess->here the Transformation is shown as 'me').
<a href="http://www.edwebservice.de/uploads/a1a956a10f.jpg">Image of sampleprocess</a> (this is only a testprocess to show what we want to do)
For testing we already run the process without the switch (making it linear), by using each transformation occurring in the switch on its own. Both tests worked well and returned the expected different values. But as mentioned above when we're using both Transformations in the switch, always the Transformation 'merge' is performed.
It does NOT matter if the Transformation 'merge' is placed in the 'if' or in the 'otherwise' branch. It does NOT matter what value (true/false) the condition should return.
Maybe its a basic desing-problem of our process?
Any suggestions will be appreciated
Regards!
Georg
Our systemenvironment:
Runtime
Java version:1.5.0_01
Java vendor:Sun Microsystems Inc.
Version
Service pack:15
Release:NW04_15_REL
Latest change:15767
Sync time:200603080654
ps: we already checked the OSS note 890760 for resolution. but this didn't solve the problem.

Hi!
@Peter:
1) the namspaces are the same. we ckecked it already.
2) status is an element NOT an attribute
3) it is the same value (no blanks etc.)
we will try to run XI with 1.4.2
@Udo:
We know how to use XPath a litte bit and were to customize an expression in the conditioneditor. We only thought that you could mean a 'special functionality' of XI
Thanks for your ideas so far!
Regards!
Georg

ML81N Problem with price field.

Hello:
Im trying to enter a service through ML81N. When I enter the PO and complete the service number, the sevice line doesnt show the following fields:
Gross price field.
Current
per unit of meas.
why it happend?
The user can enter the service.
Thanks in advance for your help
Tomas

Hi,
No need to apologise, that is why we are here, you are certainly NOT asking for too much. You are being very helpfula and providing more detail as we need it.
We enjoy helping people to get the most out of SAP and so your question is a good one.
One thing that you can do in an SAP purchase order is to move the columns around. So firstly get the user to check to see if the required columns are there but perhaps they ahve to scroll to the right to see them.
Each user can save there own format for these columns and so this user may have saved different settings to yours.
So let me know if they have found the columns futher to the rioght of the screen and we can help you to get them to the left so that they are visible straight away (basically you click once on the column header and then click and hold the button down, you can then drag the columns left and right and let go when they are where you want them. The the user clicks on the icon in the right hand corner of the item "window" (it looks a bit like a spreadsheet) and then saves this as their default.
I would suggest that you play with this a bit first, it does take practice to get it right.
(also try clicking on the dividing line between the Qty and the next field in case the user has reduced the column width to zero (in the same way that you would do this in excel)
If this is not the problem then let us know and we can try other options.
It could be that the user has an EFB parameter in their userid that is preventing the display of pricing info.
Thanks for your thanks by the way, they are a strong motivation.
Steve B

Rounding problem with statistical condition (Hint 80183)

Dear all,
we have implemented OSS hint 80183 with the variant 2. As long as a price is valid in the calculation scheme (e.g. EK01), the rounding variance in NETP is calculated correctly. If the price is not contained in the scheme, the system uses the condition VPRS (although statistical) for the rounding (see variable NETTOPREIS in formula 019).
if nettopreis is initial.
nettopreis = ykbetr * 100. "in currency YWAERS
endif.
YKBETR contains the value of VPRS, although it is statistical.
If we remove VPRS from the scheme, we get error V1208 'Error in converting exchange rate from __ to EUR'.
How can we prevent that the system calculates the rounding variance with the statistical conditions?
Thanks in advance
Stefan

solved in exit

Problem with multiple condition type for VAT &CST

Hi,Gurus,
pl. suggest the procedure for the following problem.we configured seperate pricing procedures for our product material and scrap material.We have configured same condition types for VAT(ie.condition type:ZVAT) and CST(cond type:ZCST), in both pricing procedures. Now We want to maintain seperate condition types for VAT and CST for pricing procedure for Product material and Scrap material. I have created two new condition types for scrap sales ZSCT- cst for scrap and ZSVT-vat for scrap by copying the same from existing conditions ZCST & ZVAT, and the same is included in the scrap pricing procedure. And also maintained OB40,OBCN,OVK1,OVK3,OVK4, FTXP,FV11 and VK11.
now I am facing the following problems.
1. while creating the Material master & customer master, in tax category sub screen all conditions i.e. conditions defined for product material( ZCST,ZVAT) and defined for scrap material (ZSCT, ZSVT) displaying and these are compulsory fields.
2. While creating the sale order for scrap material, system is considering the TAX classes from ZVAT/ ZCST (defined for product material) and taking the condition value from the condition type ZSVT/ ZSCT with the TAX class values of ZVAT/ZCST.
Now I would like to know is there any procedure to assign the Material type and Customer Account group to Tax category.
Thanks & Regards
sam

Hello Sam,
The Access Sequence Assigned to your New Condition types ie, ZSCT and ZSVT are same as the Previous Condition type ZVAT and ZCST.
After Adding new condition type in the Tax category in the Masters you have to take care of the Sequence of the Condition type.
If ZSCT and ZSVT is on the 3rd and 4th number in the masters the Condition table you are using in the access sequence should have fields Taxclassification3-Customer and taxclassification3- material. For ZSCT
Likewise Taxclassification4-Customer and taxclassification4- material. For ZSVT
Please add New Condition table in the access sequence with the required Field
And next when you are maintaining the condition record for say ZSCT you will have to maintain condition record for the condition table which has Taxclassification3-Customer and taxclassification3.
In Document the values will be flown correctly after changing this.
Hope I have Solved your Query.
If any Doubt please revert.
Regards,
Rohit Dongre

Problem with tax condition in TAXINN

Hi,
This is related to India.
We are using TAXINN tax procedure. We maintained the following steps:
1.all conditions in the procedure JMOP, JMX1, JECP,JEX1, JSEP, JHX1, JVRD assigned account keys for the required accordingly.
2.made tax codes V0 , V1
3.assigned accounting keys to G/L accounts in OB40
4.made condition record with Plant / vendor/ material combination for all above conditions.
When I am making PO by entering all values including tax codes I could not able to see values flowing for JEX1 (Set off condition for Ecess), JHX1(Set off condition for Sec Ecess), JVRD (VAT RM Deductible condition). When I go to Analysis Pricing and check for these conditions values are appearing for those conditions & for those combinations. But I got message Condition record exists, but has not been reset . Because of this value is not flowing.
Can any body throw light on this.
Regards

Hi Friends,
I solved this problem by doing / adding following customization:
SPRO.. Logistics genaral .. Tax on goods movement... India.. Basic settings ..Determination of excise duty.. condition based excise determation.. classify condition types
Maintained for the following :
TAXINN .. JHX1.. AT1 set off condition Total
TAXINN... JEX1... Ecss set oof condition Total
TAXINN... JVRD .. A/P RM VAT Deductible
Then assign Tax codes to Compnay codes in
SPRO.. Logistics genaral .. Tax on goods movement... India.. Basic settings ..Determination of excise duty.. condition based excise determation..
Regards

Problem with pricing condition table - Urgent

Hello,
I have created a new condition table ' 627 ' in ECC, and i want to transfer the condition table to CRM.
I did initial download for objects "DNL_CUST_CND" , "DNL_CUST_PRC".
how can i transfer the condition table.
Full points will be rewarded.
regards
yaswanth.k

Hi,
You have to create the new Adapter Object in R3AC5 for the newly created conditional table 627.
Take the standard adapter like DNL_COND_A011.
create the new Z adapter like ZDNL_COND_A627.
In the table/structure tab replace the A011 by A627 and do remaining settings as it is.
now u can carry out the inital download.
i think this will solve your problem.
Let me know the status?

Problems with template condition

Hi,
I would like to set a condition for a report template by the column header content.
I have tried the following statement:
instr(#COLUMN_HEADER#, 'TITLE')>0
and I have got the error message:
"ORA-06550: PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "#" when expecting one of the following: ( ) - + ..."
Do you have any idea why it doesn't work?
Thx!

In plain english :-) :
I want to create a report with news on the start page of a htmldb application. So I have created a table with 3 columns: DATE, HEADLINE, CONTENT. Now I want to create a template for the layout. Every record in the news table should be showed in the following way:
HEADLINE DATE
CONTENT
My idea was to create 3 conditional templates for every column of a record depending on the column's name. For example a new table row (<tr>) for the content column etc.
The column template conditions based on PL/SQL expression (e.g. instr(#COLUMN_HEADER#, 'CONTENT')>0) don't work... :-(

Problem with Price

hello
here is my problem
say i have an amount of 8,765.43, some times in sap this value is comming as 8.765,43
i mean to say its displaying . in the place of , and , in the palce of .
now if my value is displayed like 8.765,43 how can i change this to original format 8,765.43
please do not give answers considering only this value
this is just an example
ram

Hi,
DATA : lv_dcpfm TYPE xudcpfm.
SELECT SINGLE dcpfm FROM usr01 INTO lv_dcpfm
                           WHERE bname = sy-uname.
DATA lv_amt_formt(17) TYPE c value '8.765,43'.
    IF lv_dcpfm = 'X'.
      REPLACE ALL OCCURRENCES OF ',' IN:
            lv_amt_formt WITH '' .
    ELSEIF lv_dcpfm = ''.
      REPLACE ALL OCCURRENCES OF '.' IN:
            lv_amt_formt WITH '' .
      REPLACE ALL OCCURRENCES OF ',' IN:
            lv_amt_formt WITH '.' .
    ENDIF.
Regards,
Durai.V

Probleme with price condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for