Problema : LabView´s Memory Corrupted

During a temperature measurement session, I got the the following message and my application stopped:
"An exception occured within the external code
called by a Call Library Node. This may have corrupted
Lab View´s memory. You should save any work to
a new location and restart LabView. VI "xyz.vi" was
stopped at node 0x2380 of subVI "AI Single Scan (single-point waveform).vi"
Why did it happen? How can I fix this problem?

It sounds like something strange happened in a NI-DAQ VI. If you keep getting the error I would suggest re-installing NI-DAQ and if that does not help re-install both LabVIEW and NI-DAQ.

Similar Messages

Error Code "1097.....this might corrupted LABVIEW's memory.........." appears after exit the labview and re-start labview

        I have a probelm when I use the "tool/import shared library(.dll)" wizard to generate the API from C.
        The API works correctly when I complete the wizard, but after I exit labview and re-start labview to run the API again. The error 1097 code "......this might corrupted LABVIEW's memory.............."appears.
        The only solution now is to re-generate or update the wizard to generate the API.
        I try to find the answer in
        http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/58596F5D41CE8EFB862562AF0074E04C?OpenDocument
        The paragraph in above article shows
         "LabVIEW does not crash until it is closed
The most likely problem is that the DLL function being called has corrupted the memory. If you pass arrays or strings to the DLL, the DLL function cannot dynamically resize the array. Writing beyond the last element of the array or string could corrupt the memory and this may not be obvious until LabVIEW is closed."
But it doesn't match my case. Does someone have idea about this? I Attach my .h file for reference
Attachments:
test_api.h ‏1 KB
link_test_api.h ‏1 KB

wewe1215 wrote:
        I have a probelm when I use the "tool/import shared library(.dll)" wizard to generate the API from C.
        The API works correctly when I complete the wizard, but after I exit labview and re-start labview to run the API again. The error 1097 code "......this might corrupted LABVIEW's memory.............."appears.
        The only solution now is to re-generate or update the wizard to generate the API.
        I try to find the answer in
        http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/58596F5D41CE8EFB862562AF0074E04C?OpenDocument
        The paragraph in above article shows
         "LabVIEW does not crash until it is closed
The most likely problem is that the DLL function being called has corrupted the memory. If you pass arrays or strings to the DLL, the DLL function cannot dynamically resize the array. Writing beyond the last element of the array or string could corrupt the memory and this may not be obvious until LabVIEW is closed."
But it doesn't match my case. Does someone have idea about this? I Attach my .h file for reference
Which of the 2 functions do you call? How?
The documentation of InitSocketEx() seems to indicate reversed parameter order than what the function prototype looks like!
I indeed do not see much possibilities to pass in to small a buffer that the DLL function might be overwriting past the end. This really only leaves one more possibility:
Your DLL is doing something largely illegal somehow. Maybe something as silly as storing the reference to the ipAdress instead of the address itself. The memory passed as parameters into a C function is generally only valid for the duration of the call. This is especially true if you use LabVIEW since LabVIEW will re- and deallocate memory buffers frequently as soon as they are not used anymore and the parameter to a Call Library node is considered to not be required anymore after the function returns.
Rolf Kalbermatter
Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Netherlands
a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

Threat Feed say my ipad2 got threats, memory corruption vulnerability exist, which could lead to remote code execution. How to solve this problem?

Threat Feed (McAfee) say my ipad2 got threats, memory corruption vulnerability exist,
which could lead to remote code execution. How to solve this problem?

You can't solve this problem yourself. You would need to wait for apple to release a "fix" or for McAfee to revise their judgement.
If you're worried about the threats, don't do things that would expose yourself to the vulnerability that they describe.
Since I can't see what you're looking at, I can't give you any other advice.

求助:Memory Corrupted in LabVIEW?

在做实验时程序突然出错，提示如下：
"LabVIEW:An exception occured within the external code called by a Call Library Node. This may have corrupted LabVIEW´s memory. Save any work to a new location and restart LabVIEW.
VI "Meas Ipr 14 & Risetime_AD .vi" was stopped at node 0xA10 of subVI "DAQmx Create AI Channel(sub).vi"
为什么啊？以前没有碰到过，昨天一连出现了好几回。我试着重新启动LabVIEW甚至重启系统，有时候好使了，有时候又不行。
附上我的程序，谢谢。
=======================
Windows XP SP2+LabVIEW 7.1
附件:
Meas Ipr 14 & Risetime_AD.vi ‏252 KB

LipingZhao 写:
你调用的是不是一些外部板卡的dll?
会不会是这些dll和labview的兼容问题
我用的都是NI的板卡，NI PXI-5122和PXI-6224
=======================
Windows XP SP2+LabVIEW 7.1

IPhone SDK 2.2 memory corruption

Hello. I'm working on an application for iPhone SDK 2.2 and seem to be having weird memory corruption problems. Not necessarily leaks because using Instruments shows my memory stamp never going above about 1.8 megs. The nature of the app is a database of animals so I'm constantly loading and unloading sounds and images. None of the objects are very large (at most I'll have 4 800k pngs loaded at once) and I've checked and rechecked my alloc/retain/release and everything is in order (hence no memory usage increase). However...after using the application for a while I'll notice strange behavior. For example:
1) we have a UILabel as the title for each page. After a while the font size of this will change.
2) I have several screens with a subclassed UIScrollView where images are loaded and then added to. The problem shows itself here by the images not showing up. there's no crash, stepping through the debugger shows that the image loads up fine, it's just that the image is not there.
3) I have a UILabel at the top of an animal description screen, which in the nib file is called "Animal Name" by default. This will change to show "Animal Name" at the top.
I've removed all audio in our latest build so that isn't the problem. What I'm starting to suspect is that altering anything defined in a nib file will cause corruption. For example, the UIScrollView is defined in the nib file, and I constantly am reassigning the contents of that with a UIImageView. This UIImageView is handled within the subview class like :
UIImageView *imgView = [[UIImageView alloc] initWithImage: [ UIImage imageWithContentsOfFile:[[NSBundle mainBundle ] pathForResource:imageToLoad ofType:@"png" ]] ];
imgView.tag = 50;
[self addSubview:imgView ];
[ imgView release ];
Then later when moving away from the screen I'll find that view's tag and remove it from the superview (since addSubView increases the retain count, the alloc+addSubView is cancelled by release+removeFromSuperView)
I can't explain why titles that are never changed would be affected, but it must somehow be related. What I'm wondering is: are there any known issues involving modification of the contents of objects defined in Nib files? Perhaps the memory allocated when initWithNibName is restrained, then any modification of objects allocated within it can cause corruption. I'm starting to think I should just alloc and free anything modified in code and skip using nib files altogether (I reset the text on buttons for example). If this is a known issue please let me know. I'll give you more information if I can.
Thank you

Just download the huge SDK package and install. No need to uninstall the old SDK.

Memory Corrupts on Re-start of 5500

I have a Nokia 5500 that came with firmware v3.14 and I upgraded last week to v3.55 using the Nokia Software Updater successfully. But since then I have been having a problem with my memory card. Everytime I switch off and on the phone and try to access the memory card, it says that the memory card is corrupted. After a format it works till the next re-start.
I tried formatting the phone and also doing a full format using windows but even now whenever I restart the phone the memory card gets corrupted. I wonder if this is a problem with the new firmware.
Has anyone faced such a problem and can anyone guide me on how to rectify this problem. Would it help if I somehow revert back to the older firmware? If yes, then how do I reinstall the older firmware version?
Thanks in Advance,
Prashanth

Sad to say, I have a similar and recurrent problem with my E61. Out of nowhere, it will report "Memory Card Corrupted," and the only "solution" it offers is to Format the card. Brilliant. I've accepted that option twice now, and have also done reformats in my PC Card reader in both FAT and FAT32. No difference. The E61, when so inclined, reports the "Memory Card Corrupted" and I'm back to square one. A REAL annoyance as I have serious applications (e.g., TomTom Navigator on my card). Nokia has been quite unhelpful with my previous queries about SD cards. The essence of what they told me was that if it's not a NOKIA brand card, then they won't do anything. But, the bigger question is: what CAN they do? There's NO reason to think this is a card-specific issues. It's much more likely that it's a NOKIA phone defect. Having a Nokia-branded SD card would mean only that I had the dubious satisfaction of getting the same message with a "supported" card. Not exactly a motivation to buy an over-priced Nokia brand card.

HP Envy 17 Bios Memory Corruption

Dear all,
Booting with linux kernel 2.6.34, with X86_RESERVE_LOW_64K and X86_CHECK_BIOS_CORRUPTION enabled, on my HP Envy 17 1010el with BIOS F13A, I'm getting "Memory corruption in low memory" from dmesg output at 60s:
WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc0/0xd6()
Hardware name: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
Memory corruption detected in low memory
Modules linked in:
Pid: 22, comm: events/3 Not tainted 2.6.34-gentoo-r6 #3
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8103bd4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0x8f
[<ffffffff8103bdaf>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x3e
[<ffffffff8102027b>] check_for_bios_corruption+0xc0/0xd6
[<ffffffff8102029a>] check_corruption+0x9/0x2b
[<ffffffff810506cd>] worker_thread+0x19d/0x224
[<ffffffff81020291>] ? check_corruption+0x0/0x2b
[<ffffffff8105435f>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
[<ffffffff81050530>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x224
[<ffffffff81053f23>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
[<ffffffff81003754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff81053ea9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
[<ffffffff81003750>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
Could someone verify it and maybe provide an official fix.
Thank you very much.

Hi:
Actually with the Intel Core i7-720QM processor, you can install 2 x 8 GB of PC3-10600 memory, even though the specs from HP, and even Intel state the max is 8 GB.
There are several folks on this forum that have installed 16 GB of memory in notebooks with first generation core series quad processors.
Here is one such post...
http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Hardware-Upgrades-Replacements/Will-Upgrading-Pavilion-dv8t-Memory-to-1...
16 GB will not work in notebook with a first generation core series dual processor.
Windows 7 Home Premium allows up to 16 GB of memory so that wouldn't be the problem.

Satellite 5200 - Video memory corruption

One month ago I encountered a problem with a slightly garbled screen
on the internal and external displays. More or less visible vertical
strips appear on the screen. They are mainly blue on dark background
(best visible) or yellow on white background (less visible) and have
approximately the same thickness of order 1-2 mm and length of order
1 cm. The locations of the strips depend on the positions of details
of the actual picture currently displayed on the screen.
The boot screen is also garbled but now by red vertical strips located on the left and on the right of the red logo "In Touch with Tomorrow Toshiba"
In the full screen text mode, odd characters appear in positions which correlate with positions of true characters.
The BurnIn Test V4.0 Pro indicated a video memory corruption (the adapter is NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go, 64 MB, integrated RAMDAC). That is very interesting, yesterday
there was a short period of about 5 minutes when all the described above symptoms suddenly disappeared.
Even the BurnIn Test showed that everything is OK. But after this period, the symptoms recovered again. For this
reason I would like to ask how to solve the problem.
Is this indeed a bad video memory which can recover and then become bad again or other reasons, such as a bad connectivity, etc.?
Thanks.

hi, i had the same problem on a Satellite m70-159. With one diference- mine would start only in safe mode. But the same vertical strips, even in the ''in touch with tomorow'' screen. this was the good news. the bad news is that they had to replace both the motherboard and the video module.
sorry.. and it's not like anything had happened to my notebook..

Panic: Memory corruption detected

The server reboots from time to time with message:
savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after panic: Memory corruption detected for connection [::ffff:some_IP , ::ffff:some_other_IP] TCP_ESTABLISHED"
The vmcore:
=========
panic[cpu1]/thread=2a10034bd40:
0x30002237620: Memory corruption detected for connection [::ffff:212.182.39.5.8
000, ::ffff:212.182.39.219.3410] TCP_ESTABLISHED.
0x300022379e0:
0x3000374d123: 000002a10034b120 tcp:tcp_rput_data+2fe0 (5b4, 0, 0, 3000375e624,
3000375e610, 30007e682e0)
0x3000374cfe3:    %l0-3: 000003000328efc0 0000000000000010 000003000305ebc0 0000
000000000000
%l4-7: 00000000ee16f8a2 000000004d354cd9 0000030002434520 0000000000000097
0x3000374dc63: 000002a10034b360 unix:putnext+21c (0, 3000305ebc0, 20, 0, 8, 8)
0x3000374cea3:    %l0-3: 00000000012e43b4 0000030002434700 0000030002434520 0000
000000000000
%l4-7: 0000000000000000 00000000780321d0 00000300032aaa78 000003000305ebc0
0x3000374cae3: 000002a10034b410 ip:ip_rput_local+c94 (3000305ebc0, 0, 3000375e6
10, 0, 0, 3000305ebc0)
0x30003018ee3:    %l0-3: 0000030003530638 000000007801e400 0000000000000000 0000
0300035306a0
%l4-7: 00000300032aaa78 0000030002a95cc8 000003000228ddb8 0000030000061130
0x30003018c63: 000002a10034b570 ip:ip_rput+3bc (30002434298, 30000061130, 0, 30
00375e610, 8, 8)
0x30002236363:    %l0-3: 0000000000000000 0000030002a95cc8 0000030002a95cc8 0000
03000305ebc0
%l4-7: 000003000375e610 0000030000061130 0000030002434298 0000000000000000
0x30002e71223: 000002a10034b640 unix:putnext+21c (0, 30002269f80, 1, 30002a93ed
8, 16, 14)
0x30003091ae3:    %l0-3: 0000000001274658 000003000226dee0 0000030002434298 0000
000000000000
%l4-7: 0000030002269f88 000000007801e830 00000300025a67b0 000003000305ebc0
0x300030189e3: 000002a10034b6f0 pfil:pfilmodrput+5ac (300025a67b0, 3000305ebc0,
20, 30002a93ed8, 0, d03f0000)
0x30002e52c23:    %l0-3: 000000000005fb58 00000001ff1a50c0 0000030000399e10 0000
0300002a5de8
%l4-7: 00000300002a5d68 0000000078000000 0000000001496000 000003000305ebc0
0x30003091d63: 000002a10034b820 unix:putnext+21c (0, 3000305ebc0, 300025b1cf0,
3990, 10, 0)
0x300030910e3:    %l0-3: 00000000013d9ce8 00000300025a6990 00000300025a67b0 0000
000000000000
%l4-7: 0000000000000000 0000000078052580 00000300025a7458 000003000305ebc0
0x30002e71723: 000002a10034b8d0 eri:eri_read_dma+35c (3000305ebc0, ffff, 780501
f4, 3e, fc00, 1)
0x3000374db23:    %l0-3: 00000300025a7458 0000000000010000 0000000000001cc8 0000
030002a2e640
%l4-7: 000000000000003c 000003000266a000 00000300022f7990 0000000000020800
0x3000374d763: 000002a10034b9c0 eri:eri_intr+414 (3000267a278, 1c000, 10220, 10
278, 10290, 10270)
0x300030900a3:    %l0-3: 000000000000001f 00000300022f7990 000003000266a000 0000
0000000003ff
%l4-7: 000003000267a2b8 00000300022f7990 0000000078050098 00000300022f4000
0x30003091863: 000002a10034baa0 pcisch:pci_intr_wrapper+74 (30002254310, 21d, 3
0002252000, 2a10034bd40, 43a0, 1218d90)
0x30003090323:    %l0-3: 00000000013ce458 000003000257ba58 0000000000000000 0000
000000000000
%l4-7: 00000300002a5d68 00000300022f7870 0000000078000000 0000000078000000
0x3000374d8a0:
0x30003018123: syncing file systems...
=========There was installed pfil and ipf ver 4.1.5 (http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ip-filter.html)
Can Anyone help with avoid the problem in the future?
Has anyone any idea?
Greetings
Daniel

What does "$C" show for stack?
Typically, this is a little different from console output.
max

E63 - Memory Corrupted - Due to Device Lock / Remo...

I have a brand new Nokia E63 (same as E71). My memory card is suddenly corrupted, but I managed to fix it. I believe the source of the problem is the Remote Lock and the Device Lock of the unit.
The problem started after I enabled the Device Lock and Remote Lock of my E63 unit. After a couple of hours, I tried opening my apps in the memory card. To my surprise, it's corrupted! I didn't panic because I'm confident I could retrieve the contents of the card with a memory reader device. But when I inserted my memory card to my PC, the card is unreadable. I had a feeling that the card must had been badly corrupted. But how? I just got this unit almost a day ago. I didn't do anything odd. I'm an OOP-Design Patterns oriented programmer so I'm not newbie when it comes to best practices.
As I searched the web, I found that there are people who encountered the same exact problem. And their guess is also the Device Lock.
So what I did is I disabled the Remote Lock and the Device Lock feature. I checked my memory card and it's still corrupted!
I turn off my unit and turn it on again, but sadly it's still corrupted!
I removed the memory card while the unit is on and then reinserted the card, and it worked.
In summary, to solve this memory corrupted problem, try disabling the Remote Lock and Device Lock feature. To disable the Device Lock, revert the password to "12345" (Do not type the quotes). Remove the memory card (Use the remove memory card feature of your unit!). Re-insert the card to your unit and problem should be fixed.

i wonder if its a problem with this phone...i have faced a lot of problems with accessing data on the memory card...time & again the songs added to the music player list disappear...the applications that i installed on the memory card are also sometimes "invisible"...when i try installing them again, it says these already exist...
have formatted the memory card quite a few times now...
luckily for me i took the backup of the memory card (that came in the box) & phone on the very 1st day...
hence, every time i format the memory card, i copy the initial contents...
but its quite irritating & frustrating...1 nite i go to sleep after listening to songs, the next morning it shows no songs found...have to restart the phone 2-3 times to find them again...
is phone lock & device lock the same thing that you talking about? i have tried the phone lock but my memory card did not get corrupted...remote lock i have never tried...
as for your queries sidy_porche,
1) as per the specs mentioned on the site "Video recording file formats: .mp4, .3gp; codecs: H.263, MPEG-4 VSP" & "Video playback file formats: .Flash Lite 3, mp4, .3gp; codecs: H.263, MPEG-4 VSP" also "Video streaming: .3gp, mp4, .rm"
i think the specs that you mentioned for playback will be compatible...d "640x480, 15fps, 3GP"
2) 3GP videos are played...but its quite interesting...the phone plays some videos while says "file corrupt" for others of the same format...i had 2-3 video songs of mp4 format,they work absolutely fine...i then transferred some new mp4 videos & they simply wont play...
3) it takes exactly 2 hours ( you can see it on the clock ) to charge from 0 to 100%...which is quite good coz a 1500mah battery gets charged in 2 hours...i had a 6265 earlier which took around 2.5 hrs to 3 hrs to get charged with the charger that came in the box...using the adapter, ca44 or something, it got charged in 1.5 hours dot.
4) ya the hearset has a mic...the best thing about this phone or rather one of the best thing is that it has a 3.5mm audio jack...you can insert any damn headphones (your fav ones) into it & enjoyyyyy...even speakers that you attach to your laptop/computer can be used...its awesome
i hope it helps
regards,
anupam149
Message Edited by anupam149 on 19-May-2009 07:31 AM
regards,
anupam149

Memory Corruption?

Hi there, recently I reinstalled Windows and upgraded from 7 to 8.1. Back on Windows 7 I had a strange bsod every so often when playing this one game I like called Dungeon Defenders: Eternity. Part of the reason I switched from 7 to 8.1 was to get a fresh
install of Windows and some driver compatibility so I could play it bug free. It worked for about 4 days too! On Win 7 the bsod was 'probably caused by nwifi.sys' but if you look down at the new Windows 8.1 dump it says that it's a 'memory_corruption'. How
should I go about fixing this? I have some unused RAM from ages ago, never opened so I guess I could replace it, but it would be a downgrade. I guess what I'm trying to figure out is... Do I need new RAM? Is it faulty?
Oh ya, before I forget, due to this bsod only being caused by ONE game and my pc running perfectly everywhere else, I can't help but feel like my RAM is not the issue here.
Somebody save me!
Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.3.9600.17237 AMD64
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Loading Dump File [C:\Windows\Minidump\082614-16890-01.dmp]
Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available
************* Symbol Path validation summary **************
Response Time (ms) Location
Deferred srv*D:\Symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
Symbol search path is: srv*D:\Symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
Executable search path is:
Windows 8 Kernel Version 9600 MP (8 procs) Free x64
Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS
Built by: 9600.17085.amd64fre.winblue_gdr.140330-1035
Machine Name:
Kernel base = 0xfffff800`a0283000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0xfffff800`a054d2d0
Debug session time: Mon Aug 25 22:10:40.540 2014 (UTC - 6:00)
System Uptime: 0 days 2:58:59.267
Loading Kernel Symbols
Loading User Symbols
Loading unloaded module list
* Bugcheck Analysis *
Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.
BugCheck A, {fffff6fb40069d88, 0, 0, fffff800a02f858b}
Probably caused by : memory_corruption ( nt!MiAgeWorkingSet+2cb )
Followup: MachineOwner
5: kd> !analyze -v
* Bugcheck Analysis *
IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (a)
An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an
interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high. This is usually
caused by drivers using improper addresses.
If a kernel debugger is available get the stack backtrace.
Arguments:
Arg1: fffff6fb40069d88, memory referenced
Arg2: 0000000000000000, IRQL
Arg3: 0000000000000000, bitfield :
bit 0 : value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation
bit 3 : value 0 = not an execute operation, 1 = execute operation (only on chips which support this level of status)
Arg4: fffff800a02f858b, address which referenced memory
Debugging Details:
READ_ADDRESS: GetPointerFromAddress: unable to read from fffff800a05d7138
unable to get nt!MmNonPagedPoolStart
unable to get nt!MmSizeOfNonPagedPoolInBytes
fffff6fb40069d88
CURRENT_IRQL: 0
FAULTING_IP:
nt!MiAgeWorkingSet+2cb
fffff800`a02f858b 498b1e mov rbx,qword ptr [r14]
CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1
DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WIN8_DRIVER_FAULT
BUGCHECK_STR: AV
PROCESS_NAME: DUNDEFGAME.EXE
ANALYSIS_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17237 (debuggers(dbg).140716-0327) amd64fre
TRAP_FRAME: ffffd000c7cb76d0 -- (.trap 0xffffd000c7cb76d0)
NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers.
Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect.
rax=0000800000000000 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=0000ffffffffffff
rdx=0000000000000008 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000
rip=fffff800a02f858b rsp=ffffd000c7cb7860 rbp=ffffd000c7cb7960
r8=0000000fffffffff r9=8000000000000000 r10=0000007ffffffff8
r11=0000098000000000 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000
r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000
iopl=0 nv up ei ng nz na po cy
nt!MiAgeWorkingSet+0x2cb:
fffff800`a02f858b 498b1e mov rbx,qword ptr [r14] ds:00000000`00000000=????????????????
Resetting default scope
LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff800a03e2ae9 to fffff800a03d6fa0
STACK_TEXT:
ffffd000`c7cb7588 fffff800`a03e2ae9 : 00000000`0000000a fffff6fb`40069d88 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
ffffd000`c7cb7590 fffff800`a03e133a : 00000000`00000000 ffff0000`00000000 00000000`00001000 ffffd000`c7cb76d0 : nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69
ffffd000`c7cb76d0 fffff800`a02f858b : 00000000`00017608 00000000`0000012b 00000003`00000000 00000000`73576d4d : nt!KiPageFault+0x23a
ffffd000`c7cb7860 fffff800`a030bfa5 : ffffe000`bb4c6ad8 00000000`00000002 00000000`00000002 00000000`ffffffff : nt!MiAgeWorkingSet+0x2cb
ffffd000`c7cb7b70 fffff800`a030bbba : 00000000`00000000 ffffd000`c7cb7c39 ffffe000`bb4c6af0 00000000`00000000 : nt!MiTrimOrAgeWorkingSet+0xc1
ffffd000`c7cb7bb0 fffff800`a0346b92 : 00000000`00000000 ffffe000`b655f880 00000000`00000001 ffffe000`b655f880 : nt!MiProcessWorkingSets+0x1a6
ffffd000`c7cb7ca0 fffff800`a03bd81e : 00000000`00000008 00000000`00000001 ffffe000`b655f880 00000000`00000000 : nt!MmWorkingSetManager+0x4a
ffffd000`c7cb7cd0 fffff800`a0352794 : ffffe000`b655f880 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000080 00000000`00000000 : nt!KeBalanceSetManager+0x11e
ffffd000`c7cb7d40 fffff800`a03dd5c6 : ffffd000`c7aaa180 ffffe000`b655f880 ffffd000`c7ab63c0 00000000`00000000 : nt!PspSystemThreadStartup+0x58
ffffd000`c7cb7da0 00000000`00000000 : ffffd000`c7cb8000 ffffd000`c7cb2000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiStartSystemThread+0x16
STACK_COMMAND: kb
FOLLOWUP_IP:
nt!MiAgeWorkingSet+2cb
fffff800`a02f858b 498b1e mov rbx,qword ptr [r14]
SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 3
SYMBOL_NAME: nt!MiAgeWorkingSet+2cb
FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner
MODULE_NAME: nt
DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 53388e13
IMAGE_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17085
IMAGE_NAME: memory_corruption
BUCKET_ID_FUNC_OFFSET: 2cb
FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: AV_nt!MiAgeWorkingSet
BUCKET_ID: AV_nt!MiAgeWorkingSet
ANALYSIS_SOURCE: KM
FAILURE_ID_HASH_STRING: km:av_nt!miageworkingset
FAILURE_ID_HASH: {a2dd9c19-c4fc-761b-f40a-b8172b183d05}
Followup: MachineOwner
5: kd> .trap 0xffffd000c7cb76d0
NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers.
Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect.
rax=0000800000000000 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=0000ffffffffffff
rdx=0000000000000008 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000
rip=fffff800a02f858b rsp=ffffd000c7cb7860 rbp=ffffd000c7cb7960
r8=0000000fffffffff r9=8000000000000000 r10=0000007ffffffff8
r11=0000098000000000 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000
r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000
iopl=0 nv up ei ng nz na po cy
nt!MiAgeWorkingSet+0x2cb:
fffff800`a02f858b 498b1e mov rbx,qword ptr [r14] ds:00000000`00000000=????????????????
5: kd> .trap 0xffffd000c7cb76d0
NOTE: The trap frame does not contain all registers.
Some register values may be zeroed or incorrect.
rax=0000800000000000 rbx=0000000000000000 rcx=0000ffffffffffff
rdx=0000000000000008 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=0000000000000000
rip=fffff800a02f858b rsp=ffffd000c7cb7860 rbp=ffffd000c7cb7960
r8=0000000fffffffff r9=8000000000000000 r10=0000007ffffffff8
r11=0000098000000000 r12=0000000000000000 r13=0000000000000000
r14=0000000000000000 r15=0000000000000000
iopl=0 nv up ei ng nz na po cy
nt!MiAgeWorkingSet+0x2cb:
fffff800`a02f858b 498b1e mov rbx,qword ptr [r14] ds:00000000`00000000=????????????????

These crashes were related to memory corruption (probably caused by a driver). We could use the actual DMP file for analysis
Please run these tests to verify your memory and find which driver is causing the problem.
If you are overclocking (pushing the components beyond their design) you should revert to default at least until the crashing is solved. If you don't
know what it is you probably are not overclocking.
Since it is more likely to be a driver please run verifier first.
1-Driver verifier (for complete directions see our wiki here)
If verifier does not find the issue we can move on to this.
2-Memtest. (You can read more about running memtest here)
If you cannot boot after enabling verifier reboot into safe mode
In Vista & win 7 (F8)
In win 8 http://www.howtogeek.com/107511/how-to-boot-into-safe-mode-on-windows-8-the-easy-way/
Co-Authored by JMH3143
Wanikiya and Dyami--Team Zigzag

Does anyone know how to display (in LabVIEW) the memory use during execution of an image and data acquisition VI to predict when it is time to cease the acquisition to prevent the program crashing?

Does anyone know how to display (in LabVIEW) the memory use during execution of an image and data acquisition VI to predict when it is time to cease the acquisition to prevent the program crashing?
I am acquiring images and data to a buffer on the edge of the while loop, and am finding that the crashing of the program is unpredictable, but almost always due to a memory saturation when the buffers gets too big.
I have attached the VI.
Thanks for the help
Attachments:
new_control_and_acquisition_program.vi ‏946 KB

Take a look at this document that discusses how to monitor IMAQ memory usage:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/8C6E405861C60DE786256DB400755957
Hope this helps -
Julie

Memory corruption detected with linux 3.9.2-1

I have this message with dmesg and kernel 3.9.2-1, it disappears with kernel downgrade (3.8.11), what can i do ??
p.s.
the system seems to be stable.
[ 61.584649] Corrupted low memory at ffff880000006598 (6598 phys) = ff0000000000
[ 61.584695] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 61.584709] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/check.c:140 check_for_bios_corruption+0x10f/0x120()
[ 61.584712] Hardware name: HP Pavilion dv6 Notebook PC
[ 61.584714] Memory corruption detected in low memory
[ 61.584719] Modules linked in: fuse uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_core joydev videodev media hp_wmi sparse_keymap iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support arc4 snd_hda_codec_hdmi intel_powerclamp coretemp microcode psmouse serio_raw pcspkr i2c_i801 intel_ips acpi_cpufreq mperf ath9k ath9k_common ath9k_hw ath mac80211 cfg80211 r8168(O) rfkill thermal wmi snd_hda_codec_idt battery snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_page_alloc hp_accel snd_timer lis3lv02d input_polldev snd ac evdev mei soundcore lpc_ich processor radeon ttm nfs lockd sunrpc fscache ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ahci libahci ehci_pci ehci_hcd libata scsi_mod usbcore usb_common i915 video button i2c_algo_bit intel_agp intel_gtt drm_kms_helper drm i2c_core
[ 61.584832] Pid: 23, comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G O 3.9.2-1-ARCH #1
[ 61.584835] Call Trace:
[ 61.584845] [<ffffffff81058090>] warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0xa0
[ 61.584851] [<ffffffff8105810c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
[ 61.584858] [<ffffffff8104543f>] check_for_bios_corruption+0x10f/0x120
[ 61.584865] [<ffffffff8104545e>] check_corruption+0xe/0x40
[ 61.584873] [<ffffffff81075e30>] process_one_work+0x170/0x440
[ 61.584880] [<ffffffff81076905>] worker_thread+0x115/0x3d0
[ 61.584886] [<ffffffff810767f0>] ? manage_workers+0x340/0x340
[ 61.584892] [<ffffffff8107b5d0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
[ 61.584898] [<ffffffff8107b510>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x120/0x120
[ 61.584905] [<ffffffff814d96ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 61.584910] [<ffffffff8107b510>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x120/0x120
[ 61.584914] ---[ end trace 1563130596fe98e7 ]---

Nekos wrote:
I have this message with dmesg and kernel 3.9.2-1, it disappears with kernel downgrade (3.8.11), what can i do ??
p.s.
the system seems to be stable.
Well, the pithy answer would be to buy a computer from a vendor who supports free operating systems.
Of course, I own and love my DV4.
What does it mean? Some BIOS implementations use areas of low memory without properly allocating it (letting the operating system know it is in use). Windows just does not use that area of memory, and some vendors do a sloppy job in their software quality; it only has to work with Redmond code, so why fix it?
Linux is forced to implement a bunch of ridiculous hacks to work around low quality hardware and firmware. You found one. The kernel was watching that memory to see if it could be trusted. Something changed that memory when nothing (in the kernel's view) should have touched it. Since it changed, the kernel has taken note that that memory should not be trusted. Kind of analogous to finding a bad block on a disk drive and subsequently ignoring it by adding it to a list of bad blocks.
So, aside from sucking it up because you lost some usable memory, you need do nothing.
EDIT: BTW, it probably means the new kernel is more stable.
Last edited by ewaller (2013-05-16 15:03:00)

Problem in ABAP memory

Hi Experts,
This is problem about ABAP memory.
I have two programs. Program-A & Program-B
Program-A sets value to variable and EXPORT command is used to set this variable in memory.
EXPORT variable TO DATABASE indx(st) ID 'KEYVALUE'.
Program-B gets variable using IMPORT command from memory.
IMPORT variable FROM DATABASE indx(st) ID 'KEYVALUE'.
User runs Program-A in SE38. Program-A calls Program-B using a button click event (SUBMIT).
The scenario is..
User1 executes the Program-A,
which set the variable = User1 in memory.
User2 executes the Program-A,
which set the variable = User2 in memory.
User2 clicks button to call Program-B,
which imports variable = User2 from memory.
User1 clicks button to call Program-B,
which imports variable = User2 from memory.
(But User1 expects the variable = User1).
So User1 gets wrong variable value set by another User.
How to handle this situation?. How to set memory variables user specific? I will appriciate all helpful answers.
Thanks in advance
Hari.

What you are using is global memory, if you don't want other sessions to see it, then you have to use a memeory id instead. This will work when submittin program b using the SUBMIT statement.
export variable to memory id 'ZRICHTEST'.
import variable from memory id 'ZRICHTEST'.
Or you can simply make your KEYVALUE unique by giving the USERID as part of it.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Does anyone know how to display (in LabVIEW) the memory use during execution of an image and data acquisition VI to predict when it is time to cease the acquisition to prevent the program crashing?

Does anyone know how to display (in LabVIEW) the memory use during execution of an image and data acquisition VI to predict when it is time to cease the acquisition to prevent the program crashing?
I am acquiring images and data to a buffer on the edge of the while loop, and am finding that the crashing of the program is unpredictable, but almost always due to a memory saturation when the buffers gets too big.
I have attached the VI.
Thanks for the help
Attachments:
new_control_and_acquisition_program.vi ‏946 KB

got these vi's off ni site a while ago - see if they help
Attachments:
Memory_Monitor.zip ‏132 KB

Problema : LabView´s Memory Corrupted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for