Process Chain after EVENT - More than once

Hi all, I would like to run a process chain after an event; everything works fine with the following model...
PC1 >>
     >> some processes
     >> EVENT TRIGGER
PC2 >>
     (after EVENT) runs ok after event ONLY if I SCHEDULE it
After succesfully run, I've tried to run again immediatly PC1 again and it runs ok, even triggers mentioned EVENT, but PC2 never runs again until I manually SCHEDULE it.
The answer is: how should I SCHEDULE the process chain PC2 so I'll "never" need again to SCHEDULE it when I want it to run after event triggered on PC1?
Hope you can help me.
Thanks a lot!
Bernardo

Hello,
Both process chains are separated. At the model I described, at the end of PC1 event is succesfully triggered. After event is triggered at PC1, PC2 triggers correctly due it is scheduled as "after event".
Everything works fine, then, if I trigger PC1 again it runs correctly; event is triggered succesfully but PC2 (that is scheduled as "after event") doesn't runs; this is because I haven't SCHEDULED it again (after the first succesfully run).
What I want is not schedule PC2 after a succesfully run. Is there any way to reach that purpose?
Thanks again!
Bernardo

Similar Messages

Need a way for SQL Replication Alert for "agent failed" to only register with SCOM after failing more than once.

We have SQL Replication that goes occurs over a WAN and, often, it fails to replicate successfully. But, on the next replication attempt, is usually will succeed.
Is there a way to only have the alert, including the notification for it, occur if one or two consecutive attempts fail?

Hi,
Take a look at the following sites:
http://blogs.catapultsystems.com/cfuller/archive/2010/11/10/enabling-sql-replication-monitoring-%E2%80%93-what-to-expect-in-the-replication-views-in-opsmgr.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/repltalk/archive/2010/05/09/all-about-automatically-monitoring-replication-agent-failures.aspx
Hope it helps:
Greetings
Roel Knippen
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Ftp Adapter getting invoked more than once

Hello All,
I have an FTP polling on a remote server, the options that i chose are archive file after read. The problem is the bpel process is getting invoked more than once. If anyone encountered a similar problem, help is really appreciated.
Thanks
Krishna

Hi Krishna,
What release are you on? refer to metalink note: 730515.1
In 10.1.3.4 MLR#7 this works:
Add the below section within BPELProcess and replace the bits in upper case to suit your code:
    <activationAgents>
      <activationAgent className="oracle.tip.adapter.fw.agent.jca.JCAActivationAgent" partnerLink="PARNERLINKNAME">
        <property name="clusterGroupId">SOMEUNIQUEVALUE</property>
        <property name="portType">PARTNERLINK_PORTTYPE</property>
      </activationAgent>
    </activationAgents>regards,
Shanmu
http://www.prshanmu.com/articles/

QuickTime DOM Events called more than once?

I am in the process of writing code in JavaScript that will track the interaction on a embedded QuickTime video.
function ew_addImage(v) {
trackImg=new Image(1,1);
trackImg.src=v;
function ew_pauseTrk() {
var imgStr='http://www.sldkfjsldfjk.com/200125/EWTRACKNEW_VINT?ewadid=751801&ewbust='ewbust'&eid=1078554&file=$VIDEO$&bw=56&vlen=3:00&vint=PAUSED';
ew_addImage(imgStr);
if (document.addEventListener)
document.getElementById("mov1").addEventListener("qt_pause", ew_pauseTrk, false);
Everything works correctly. I am able to see the image being called when I am looking at Wireshark. The problem is when I click pause more than once.. It seems like the QuickTime DOM Events can only be called once.. Is that true?
Thanks

-(void) flipToEditView {
[self populateTheList]; // populate an array
EditViewController *anEditVC = [[EditViewController alloc] initWithNibName:@"EditView" bundle:nil];
[self setEditVC:anEditVC];
[viewController.view removeFromSuperview];
[self.window addSubview:[editVC view]];
[anEditVC release]; }
}<---- is this } matched elsewhere?

Terminating Event Getting triggered more than once

Hi All,
I am facing a very peculiar problem in PR release workflow(item wise release, business object BUS2009).
One of the requirements of the workflow is to send a mail to PR initiator once it is rejected by any of the approvers(4, in my case). The event associated with the cancellation of the workflow is REJECTION_START.
The problem is that this event is being triggered more than once. One thing that i have observed is that if eg. second level of approver cancels it, the event is triggered twice. Likewise if third level of approver cancels it, it is being triggered thrice. Which leads to sending of 2 and 3 mails respectively to the PR initiators mailbox.
Why is this happening? Ideally, only one event should have been triggered, and the triggering of the event should have been independent of PR approver's level. I am at my wits end regarding this.
Any suggestions in this regard will be highly appreciated
Regards
Varsha Agarwal.

If you check for 2nd level rejjection two release Code is associated so it triggers 2 times and same for 3rd level approval.
I think you have to put some sort of filter using FM SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_OBJECT
in the attribute portion of yopur custom BO.
The attribjute will check this FM and if it has entries that means already a Workflow has been triggered it should set the flag as X.
Make use of this attribute in defining the start condition of this task thru
SWB_COND.
Thanks
Arghadip

Continual request to upgrade. even though I have gon thru process more than once

Over the last few weeks I have been continually ask to upgrade to the latest version. I have done this more than once. just a few days ago and I am still getting request..Whts up?

If there are problems with updating or with the permissions then easiest is to download the full version and trash the currently installed version to do a clean install of the new version.
Download a new copy of the Firefox program and save the disk image (dmg) file to the desktop
You can find the latest Firefox releases here:
*Firefox 8.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
*Firefox 3.6.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
*Trash the current Firefox application to do a clean (re-)install
*Install the new version that you have downloaded
Your profile data is stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder, so you won't lose your bookmarks and other personal data if you uninstall and (re)install Firefox.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

After Upgrade Cloud Control from 12.1.0.3 to 12.1.0.4 the user name and password have to be entered more than once

Hi everybody,
we recently upgraded our Cloud Control from 12.1.0.3 to 12.1.0.4.
Now we have the following, a little bit strange behaviour.
Everytime we want to log into Cloud Control we have to enter our password more than once.
Sometimes even more than twice.
It alawys says user name and password are required
Does anybody has the same problem?
I didn't found anything on MOS. So any advice or answer is appreciated.
Greetings,
Daniel

Hi Daniel,
We have seen similar issue when we use non-certified browsers for accessing 12c console
Use certified versions of IE with EM 12.1.0.4 Cloud Control. for instance, Microsoft Internet Explorer 10.*, 9.*, 9 and 8 versions only.
This document can help you to understand the Certified Browsers:
<<Doc ID 1912367.1>> EM12c : Supported Browsers and Adobe Flash Players list
Regards,
Rahul

Document contains some order item more than once - invoice verification

Hi,
we have one cross company stock transfer process in which when a billing is created in SD side, an IDOC will be triggered automatically and create an invoice verification at the MM side.
The problem is some of our billing of this process having an IDOC application error that said.
Document contains same order item more than once
Message no. M8321
Diagnosis
Under the following circumstances, you can settle an order item in an invoice received via EDI more than once:
- Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has been defined for the order item.
- The IDoc contains the delivery note numbers of the goods receipts.
System Response
If this is not the case, the system cancels posting of the IDoc.
Question:
1 - The funny thing is IDOC showing 51 IDOC error code message on status record of INVOIC. But the invoice verfication get created in PO history.
2 - I think this error is because we need to make the PO as GR-based Inverifcation. We have flagged it in Vendor master, and Info record, but this indicator is not flag automatically in the PO (and we cannot manually change the PO as this indicator is grey-out). How?
3 - how to solve this error?
Thanks

Once PO history is created, you cannot change the "GR-based-IV" flag. Two options are there before you.
1. Cancel all the GRs & Invoices posted in the STO then system will allow you to update the GR-based-IV flag. After updating this flag repost the GRs and invoices.
2. Create a new STO, now since you have updated the vendor maser & info-record, this flag will automatically get updated during the STO creation itself.
First option is tedious and should be selected only if you can go option 2 is not at all feasible

AddOn: Prevent from loading more than once

Good Afternoon
Experts:
I appreciate you patience as I resurrect this topic since it has become an
increasing concern here. We need a way to restrict our AddOn from "being in"
Task.mgr more than once. We are working with Terminal Services. A couple ways we have found more than one instance in TM is the User just opening another session or opening another session after a "problem/Issue/Crash".
I have this code which restricts the AddOn from starting more than once here on my local machine:
Public Sub Main()
        Try
            Dim x As Integer = 0
            Dim Ctr As Integer = 0
            Dim som() As System.Diagnostics.Process
            som = System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcesses
            Dim Name As String
            For x = 0 To som.Length - 1
                Name = som(x).ProcessName.ToUpper
                If som(x).ProcessName = "Test.Enhance" Then
                    Ctr += 1
                End If
            Next x
            If Ctr > 0 Then
                MsgBox("LBSI.Enhance AddOn is already started...Exiting application.", MsgBoxStyle.Critical)
                Exit Try
            Else
                ReInitializeAddOn()
                Application.Run()
            End If
        Catch ex As Exception
            HandleException("Main", ex, True)
        End Try
    End Sub
Is there a better more elegant way to do this? How about for Terminal Services?
Thanks in advance for your insight,
EJD

Not answered...so I will close.

Archiving same data more than once due to overlapping variant values

Hi all,
i had accidently run 2 archiving jobs on the same data. For instance, job 1 was archiving for company code IN ( where the company code was from IN00 till ZZ00), which was the unwanted job. The second archive job archived data from IN99 till INZZ ( not the whole IN company code ).
These 2 jobs failed due to log fulll ( the data was too huge to be archived), however when i expand the jobs in the failed SARA session, the archive files has up to 100 MB size.
Below are some of the problems which will incur if we archive the same data more than once ( which i found from my online search )
- some archiving objects require that data only exists once in the archive therefore duplicate data can lead to erroneous results in the totals of archived data
- Archiving the data again will affect checksum. Checksum normally conducted before and after archiving process and its purpose is to validate whether the same file contents exist in the newly created archive files as compare the original data.
Could anyone advice me on how to overcome this multiple archiving on the same data issue. Apart from above stated impact, what are the other problems of multiple archiving on same data?
The failed archived sessions are currently in "Incomplete Archiving Session" and in 1 week time they will be deleted by archive delete jobs and will be moved to "Completed Archive Session". I highly appreciate if anyone could help
Source of finding:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/4d/8c7890910b154ee10000000a42189e/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/8d/3e4fc6462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/8d/3e4fc6462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm

Hello,
There are several issues here. In this case it seems pretty clear cut that you did not want the first variant to be executed. Hopefully none of the deletions have taken place for this archive run.
In cases where you have overlapping selection criteria and some of the deletions have been processed you can be in a very difficult situation. The best advise that I have would be to check your archive info structure CATALOG definition and make sure that both the archive file and the offset fields are set to DISPLAY fields and not KEY fields.
If your file and offset are key fields then when you use the archive info structure you would pull up more than one copy of the archived document.
Example: FI document 12345 was archived and deleted in archive run 1 and archive run 2.
The search for the archive info structure when the file and offset are keys fields would return two results.
12345 from run 1
12345 from run 2
If the CATALOG has the file and offset as display only fields you would only return one result
12345 from (whichever deletion file was processed first)
The second deletion process would have a warning message in the job log that not all records were inserted.
Please note that any direct access of the data archive file that bypasses the archive info structure and goes directly to the data archiving files would still show two documents and not a single document.
Regards,
Kirby Arnold

'PortfolioBacklogs' cannot appear more than once if content model type is "all"

I'm trying to add another level above feature and have followed these instructions https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn217880.aspx
The project is setup as scrum not agile, maybe that is why???, but I get the following error:
'PortfolioBacklogs' cannot appear more than once if content model type is "all"
and haven't been able to find where to change the content model type.

Hi Dckennedy1,
Thanks for your post.
What’s the version of your TFS? TFS 2013 Update 4? Your current team project created using default Scrum 2013.4 process template?  After which step you received this error? You can share your error screenshot(s) here.
I created a new Scrum 2013.4 template team project in my TFS 2013 Update 4 Server, and followed the steps in that document to add Initiatives work item type in my TFS Web Access, the Initiatives work item type be added into portfolios successfully, you can
refer to the below screenshot:
The only difference with steps in that document is I edited the PortfolioBacklogs section as below in my ProcessConfiguration.xml file.
   <PortfolioBacklog category="MyCompany.InitiativeCategory" pluralName="Initiatives" singularName="Initiative">
      <States>
        <State value="New" type="Proposed" />
        <State value="In Progress" type="InProgress" />
        <State value="Removed" type="InProgress" />
        <State value="Done" type="Complete" />
      </States>
      <Columns>
        <Column refname="System.WorkItemType" width="100" />
        <Column refname="System.Title" width="400" />
        <Column refname="System.State" width="100" />
        <Column refname="Microsoft.VSTS.Common.BusinessValue" width="50" />
        <Column refname="Microsoft.VSTS.Scheduling.TargetDate" width="100" />
        <Column refname="System.Tags" width="200" />
     </Columns>
      <AddPanel>
        <Fields>
          <Field refname="System.Title" />
        </Fields>
      </AddPanel>
    </PortfolioBacklog>
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Prevent user from resetting password more than once in a day

Hi,
1) my requirement is that, i want to prevent a user from resetting his password more than once in a day in OIM 11g.
i guess that has to be implemented using a pre-process event handler on reset password page.
is that achieveable? i dont have much idea on which places i can attach a pre-process event handler to.
2) I want to restrict a user from using sequential passwords. eg: abhi1, abhi2, abhi3
This is not present OOTB. just want to know. can we do it via custom code.? but this will expose that password (security breach- which i dont want)
is there any way i can achieve this via configurations in OIM or some event handler.?
Thanks in advance.

1.yes, update "Minimum Password Age" to 1 for the password policy.
2. you can't achieve this by configuration. But, yes write an event handler and put your validation there. probably this is required on manual create or update so use pre-insert and pre-update eventhandler for validation.
--nayan

Since I updated to iCloud, Mail on my MacBookPro 10.6.8 has been unable to connect to MobileMe more than once or twice per day. Mail on my iPhone 4 has no problems. What's wrong?

Since I updated to iCloud, (which may or may not be related) Mail on my MacBookPro 10.6.8 has been unable to connect to MobileMe more than once or twice per day. Mail on my iPhone 4 and my old iMac has no problems. When there is no service a yellow warning triangle appears adjacent to the Inbox and Connection Doctor reports,"Trying to log into this MobileMe IMAP account failed. Verify that username and password are correct." Since it does fetch Mail from time to time they cannot be wrong.... can they? Should I update to 10.7 and if so what does that entail?

You have been using MobileMe's email settings, which sometimes continue to work for a time after migration but then get turned off. iCloud's mail server settings are different. Strictly speaking Lion 10.7.2 is required for iCloud, and on that Mail is set up automatically.
Snow Leopard cannot access most of iCloud's facilities, however you can set Mail up manually to access your email. The method is described here:
http://www.wilmut.webspace.virginmedia.com/notes/icloudmail.html
The situation with iCloud and Snow Leopard is described in detail here:
http://www.wilmut.webspace.virginmedia.com/notes/icloudSL.html

Can you create a form in which its never possible for the same person te sign the form more than once.

Hi, I've been looking into this for awhile and believe the answer is 'no' but was just wondering if anyone here would know of a solution.
The company I work for has a formulier on which a number of Excel files are placed. This form is then sent to a five (often different) people who are then required to open the Excel files and if accord to place their digital signature. We would like to make sure that no one is able to sign the form more than once and also if possible to make sure they have opened the Excel files. It would be great if anyone had any tips...
All the very best,
Martin Angell

I am not an Excel or Excel-to-PDF conversion expert, so I do not know how Excel forms are converted to PDF form fields. With this caveat here's what I do know.
In Acrobat It is possible to create a PDF form in which there are JavaScripts associated with fields (any fields, including signature fields). These JavaSripts can do a lot of things, including checking the signer's certificates on the already signed signature fields. Then you can make all unsigned signature fields read-only, in which case the user will not be able to actually sign them. After that you can overlay a button field on top of each unsigned signature field with exactly the same dimensions and associate a JavaAcript with this button field. This JavaScript would put up an UI asking the user for the signing certificate and its password, check this certificate's CN against the list of already signed signature fields and initiate the signing of the unsigned signature field behind this button if your condition is satisfied.
I never tried that myself but it could work. This looks complicated and it is but if you really want it you can try.

Deauthorizing all machines more than once in a year?

Is it possible to deauthorize all machines more than once in a year? I have had two machines crash and one time I forgot to de-authorize before I installed a new OS.
iTunes tells me I have to wait until June to do this. There has to be a way to manually get someone to agree to do this. Is there a number I can call or process????
tflink
HP Compaq NC8230 Windows XP Pro

No.

Process Chain after EVENT - More than once

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for