Process of Clearing WM Data at Storage Unit Level

Dear All,
I have an issue where our client has decide to temporaryly halt the WM function which was implemented for past three weeks. Now i have stocks in the new warehouse storage locations both in IM & WM. Presently the users are executing the IM Function but not the WM (Storage Unit ) part. They do not want to execute storage unit level process due to practical concerns. How do i go about clearing the WM part of the stock, since the storage unit level information is wrong at present.
I might have asked this question before this, i would appreciate if you could provide me a detailed procedure, on how i have to go about clearing the WM Data, and enable the user to procedure with the IM Process as before.
Thanks & Regards
Shabeen Buhary

Dear Frenchy,
Thanks for your response. That is exactly what i am doing at the moment. Transfer the stocks at roll level to 999 storage type.
I am also looking into the possible of using LI21. But my concern is at the present moment i do not want to maintain any stocks at storage unit level (since the users have stopped using the WM Module due to technical & practical reasons). So storage unit level info is not important for them they want to only execute the IM Part, is there a possibility where i could just remove the storage unit level stocks without affecting the IM portion (since the IM Portion is correct). Any standard transaction, movement type to exexute this.
And alternative option i presume is to transfer the stocks from the warehouse storage location to non warehouse storage location.
Regards
Shabeen Buhary

Similar Messages

  • Need Ideas For Storage Units Data Storage Capabilities - Special Attributes? History? 2 Ind-UMs

    Hello experts,
    The company I'm working for is looking into permanently-storing pallet level information (keep a history of the pallet movements) and use RF-scanners to move product in the warehouse. They have made a decision to implement Warehouse Management's Storage Unit Management functionality. They looked into Handling Units as well, but they don't want to use HUs for many reasons.
    They would also like to store 2 units of measure at the Storage Unit level without activating "Catch Weight Management" because that would require them to run parallel systems for a while and also deal with CWM functionality restrictions. Keep in mind that most of the products they handle are catch-weight products, so UM conversions don't work for them.
    Solutions I have in mind:
    For storing 2 independent UMs: Store the quantity of the 2nd unit of measure in a custom table at the Storage Unit level and use custom RF-scanner programs to "receive, issue, scrap, and move" goods in the warehouse. These custom RF-scanner programs would update SAP standard table with 1st (base) UM and also custom table with 2nd UM.
    For permanenlty-storing SU history: Use custom table to to store Storage Unit History. The custom programs created to handle the SUs would update this custom table.
    Last time I checked, the history of a Storage Unit is not recorded in SAP, correct? ONLY in Handling Units, correct?
    OR are there any documents/tables that permanently store the Storage Unit number so they can be queried after the Storage Unit is consumed/issued?
    I know SAP keeps improving its applications with every release, so I'm just looking at my options here.
    Does anyone else have any other ideas on how to approach this other than Using Handling Units & Catch Weight Management?
    Thanks in advance!
    -Mr. Bello
    Message was edited by: Jürgen L

    For storing 2 independent UMs
    Can you please explore the LS26 option there also system is allowing you to change the parameter"Unit of measure" and displays the stock on different UoM, hopefully this will solve your problem and you need not design a custom table to store the value at different UoM level
    For permanenlty-storing SU history:
    System store the storage unit related value in table : LEIN however the moment you do any consumption or movement to non SU the entries goes off from this table hence i think the approach taken by you seems the only one approach  to store the historical data. (Make sure you are taking into consideration of the archiving activity as you proceed further the size of database will get bigger and time to generate any report will take longer then expected

  • Storage unit types and storage bin types  - Need

    Hi,
    i want to know what is the use of the storage unit type and storage bin type.
    thanks,
    Maxx

    Dear Maxx,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/c6/f844694afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Storage Bin:
    A storage type generally contains several storage spaces or slots. These are called storage bins in Warehouse Management (WM). The storage bin is the smallest available unit of space in a warehouse. The storage bin therefore describes the position in the warehouse where the goods are or can be stored.
    Since the address of a storage bin is frequently derived from a coordinate system, a storage bin is often referred to as a coordinate. The coordinate 01-02-03 for example, can refer to a storage bin in row 1, stack 2, and level 3.
    You assign each storage bin to a specific warehouse number and storage type according to its location. You must also assign each storage bin to a storage section.
    You can also define the following additional characteristics of a storage bin:
    Maximum weight
    Total capacity
    Fire containment section
    Storage bin type (for example, for small or large pallets)
    With certain stock placement strategies, the storage bin type plays a significant role in optimizing the automatic search for a storage bin in connection with the pallet type. For example, you can define the WM putaway strategy to place large industrial pallets into a specific large bin type and smaller pallets into small bins.
    Storage Unit:
    In the system, a storage unit record consists of a header and at least one material data record (quant data record).
    The header contains information which is relevant for the entire storage unit and includes the:
    Storage unit number
    Storage unit type (SUT) of the storage unit
    Storage bin in which the storage unit is currently located
    Status, which provides current information about the storage unit
    Specific information about the stock contained in a storage unit is found in the material data record. The material record is already familiar to you in the existing system as a quant data record. For SU management, this information can be managed at the storage unit level.
    The following graphics illustrate how WM handles storage bins with and without the use of storage unit management. For these examples, storage bins are displayed in which 200 boxes of red pencils and 50 boxes of blue pencils are stored. The stock is distributed on two pallets.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • R/3 request storage unit during TO confirmation

    Dear all,
    I bump into an obstacle while perform TO confirmation.
    During TO confirnmation, there is one screen requesting me to key in the storage unit.
    I tried to put in some of the storage unit from the the search screen (i.e. the little round shape next to the field), but system don't allow.
    May I know how to handle this?
    Do I need to create a new storage unit and put in to this field during TO confirmation?
    thanks
    tuff

    Dear Sinéad, and other,
    Ok this is how I bump into the error (in between, my WM knowledge has not reach the Storage Unit yet).
    I have created a TO for picking from a delivery order via VL02N's menu screen (i.e. movement type 601). Next, I perform a TO confirmation in LT12, and when I click the "Confirm Internally" button, R/3 jumps to this screen requesting the following two data:
    1- Storage unit
    << I tried to assign some randomly existing SU unit to this field but R/3 complaint "Storage unit 00157032650003548391 does not exist Message no. L3209">>
    2- Destination Storage Unit
    << I tried to assign some randomly existing SU unit to this field but R/3 complaint "Target handling unit 157032650000046104 is not assigned to TO 0000353991 Message no. L3822">>
    I just don't know how to proceed now as without the confirmation there is no picking (i.e. as the actual quantity field in the LT12 screen still empty) and there is a problem on PGI later on my delivery.
    Please teach me how to proceed when encounter above obstacles.
    thanks
    tuff

  • Storage unit not disapperar from WM warehouse

    hI Guru's.
    I' ve created and confirmed a TO's correctly.
    These TO's are to change stock between warehouses.
    The problem is that the storage unit not dissapear from source warehouse and the TO is correctly confirmed.
    Anyone can help me??
    thanks a lot.
    Ismael

    If you don't want to see the SUN in receipting warehouse, you have to deacitvate the "SU MANAGEMENT ACTIVE" in the following configuration.
    SPRO>LE>WM>Storage Units>Master Data>Activate storage unit Management Per warehoue Number,
    Choose the receipting warehouse number and de-activate the check box.
    Let me know, how it goes.

  • Function module  which changes the Storage Unit (SU) Block Data like LS32

    Hi,
    Is there any Function module  which changes the Storage Unit (SU) Block Data as done in  LS32.
    Thank you,
    Prashanth A.

    Hello Pablo.
    Yes we did run LT04 and it does encounter that same error message after clicking the Stock Removal button.  But eventually error msg will be removed by entering the value at the Storage Unit Type field because it directly fills in LTAP-LETYP.
    We have resolved that the function module will not really fill the desired Storage unit type therefore TO background creation is not feasible in our scenario (non-SU managed transfer to SU-managed storage type).  And I found this thread too:  http://scn.sap.com/thread/1947358
    So issue is still open but we have considered of changing the process since this is still just a new scenario for us.
    Thanks a lot for your inputs!

  • Mixing materials with different Goods Receipt date in the same Storage Unit

    Hello everybody,
    I´d like to know how  FIFO strategy would affect to this example:
    Adding boxes from one storage unit (pallet) to another storage unit (pallet). Both storage units have different goods receipt dates, so there is a pallet which has boxes with different GR dates.
    Would FIFO make difference among boxes inside the storage unit?. As far as I know, when adding stock (boxes) to a handling unit (pallet), the system keeps the oldest GR date and does not create new quant number for the incoming boxes
    Thanks in advance for your help

    Hi Nagesh,
    Thank you for the input. I am receiving Stock from vendor and while creating Inbound delivery i created the Handling Unit and also packed it and i could also post it (PG Receipt). Now when i am creating TO i have that error message. The Storage Location where i am receiving is 9001and i have also maintained the partner Storage location,,, its like this Plant(1000)-SLoc(9001)-Partner SLoc(9002).... now the Storage Location 9002 is not HU managed,, the reason i gave this Storage location is, initially i gave 9001, but system said "Storage Location 9001 and 9001 must have different management systems". So now kindly tell me what is the purpose of the partner Storage location and which storage location should i give, as my partner Storage location across "1000-9001-????" thank you again for ur inputs.
    Regards,
    Samuel

  • Storage Unit Date

    Dear Experts
    Please advice which exit / badi / enhancement can be used to derive the same / orginal storage unit date in case when we transfer stocks from one storage location to other.
    when the stocks are transfered from one Sloc - WM location to other Sloc WM location, the system consumes the orginal storage unit in the source location and creates new storage unit in the destination location. due to this the ageing of the item in the destination storage bin becomes new and the system does not consider the orginal storage unit number
    Can you please help me find a solution for this since the ageing report is being developed and derived from BI
    Thanks

    closed

  • Clear Partial Data in an Essbase Aggregate storage database

    Can anyone let me know how to clear partial data from an Aggregate storage database in Essbase v 11.1.13? We are trying to clear some data in our dbase and don’t want to clear out all the data. I am aware that in Version 11 Essbase it will allow for a partial clear if we write using mdx commands.
    Can you please help me on the same by giving us some examples n the same?
    Thanks!

    John, I clearly get the difference between two. What I am asking is in the EAS tool itself for v 11.1.1.3 we have option - right clicking on the DB and getting option "Clear" and in turn sub options like "All Data", "All aggregations" and "Partial Data".
    I want to know more on this option part. How will this option know which partial data to be removed or will this option ask us to write some MAXL query for the same"?

  • Simple Storage unit management by using of 'real' handling unit data

    Hi all,
    actually we have a WM setup to use the full handling unit management in Warehouse. After some years we detected that the HU managed
    Warehouse is not the best solution for our business.
    Inside of WM we do no more want to have the Handling units. The assigned storage location is not HU managed.
    Now to my question:
    We receive from other plants finished goods via inbound delivery. All goods are packed on Handling Units.
    When doing the good receipt, Is it possible to use the HU data (vekp, vepo) and create according to it the WM storage units? So one Handling unit
    from the inbound delivery will become one storage unit.
    thanks in advance for your answers.
    Michael

    Hi Patrick,
    we actually have SAP WM with HU management running. but we want to go back to WM without HU management - only with the storage unit management.
    when getting an inbound delivery from another plant (in the same client) goods are batch managed and packed on HU´s. i am searching for a possibility to use the HU data from the inbound delivery to create the WM storage units. So one HU should become one WM storage unit.
    so i will post to an ERP comuity.
    thanks
    Michael

  • Split transfer order on the basis of Storage Unit type(SUT)

    Hi,
    I got one problem and want the solution for that immediately.the problem is as follows:-
    The transfer Order needs to be split by quantity according to the quantity per Storage Unit Type.
    I have to do this making chages in the SAP standard user Exit EXIT_SAPLL03A_12 in the program SAPML03T.
    Eg.One scenario is provided
    •Scenario 1:     Perform transaction MIGO with a movement type ‘101’ for Outbound Delivery 80000201. Enter a quantity of 15 kgs.
    the result should be as follows:
    •Scenario 1: Check TO’s created by going to transaction LT22. Enter Warehouse number 200; Storage type 902. Select the Dynamic Selections button and select ‘Transfer order Item’. Double click on Material and enter the material number (W075006). The SUT is 5kg so the expected result is for 3 TO’s to have been created.
    Means one TO got splitted in 3 TOs.
    Please provide me the help.

    Hi Vinay,
    This can be done purely through customizing. Please check IMG -> Logistics Execution -> Warehouse Management -> Activities -> Transfers -> Processing Performance Data/Split. You will need to define a sorting profile for TO split in where LETYP (storage unit type) can be used as sorting condition. The sorting profile should then be assigned to defined TO split.
    Hope it helps.
    Have a nice weekend!

  • TO Error: Source HU ******* is not contained in Source storage unit *******

    Dear All,
    Our warehouse Handling Unit managed. I have created a delivery which is partially picked.
    After that when I am trying to create Transfer Order, I am getting an error "*Source HU ******* is not contained in Source storage unit ******"
    I am getting a pop up window in the name of "Enter withdrawal of Handling Units", and it is asking me to enter the Quantity to be repacked.
    I am getting this error only when I am doing Partial picking.
    How to get rid of this error. Kindly suggest.
    Regards,
    Mullairaja
    Edited by: MullaiRaja on May 26, 2011 10:47 AM

    Hello
    This can be the whole pallet have to be withdrawn from the source (flag LTAP-HOMVE is set on, 'X'), but HU picking control does not propose the source HU as the destination HU (flag LTAP-HUPIK is clear, ' '). Kindly check.
    If that is not the case then, for your reference refer following SAP notes:
    - 662020:      Processing of TO with different storage types
    - 514604:      Storage unit is not deleted when posting goods issue
    - 721901:      Errors LF-064, L3-848 while picking w/o pick-HU
    - 552073:      Message L3222 when creating transfer order with LT09
    - 505542:      Incomplete TO confirmation in Transaction LT0H & LT0I
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • L_TO_CREATE_SINGLE  -  new storage unit is not created by SAP

    Hello Friends,
    I am using a FM L_TO_CREATE_SINGLE to create transfer order.
    But, When I am not passing Destination SU as import parameter, it gives me following error.
    "Storage unit XXXXXXX is not consistent with other transfer order data"
    This is happening in ECC 6.0. Earlier i was using ECC 5.0 and there was no problem.
    How can I get rid out of this problem?
    Regards,
    RH

    Hi,
    Check the long text of the message.
    It clearly says that
    "Data in the transfer order item (such as the quant number, storage bin or storage type) does not belong to the storage unit number that you entered."
    So check to see if the storage unit number you entered is correct.
    This seems to be a data issue.
    Regards,
    Ankur Parab

  • Palletization and storage unit management

    Hi,
    On the WM view 2 in material master, there is a section call palletization.
    Question:
    1 u2013 If this material is going to be used in a storage unit environment, is it COMPULSORY to maintain it? If not maintain it, will I face error during TO creation for SU process?
    2 u2013 Because we wouldnu2019t know the Storage unit type upfront until when the truck actually stop at our warehouse, and we using scanner to perform TO creation. Thus, under such scenario, is there a way in the system setup to bypass this maintenance in the material master and later still allow me to put in the SUT  Type I desire on the spot?
    tuff

    palleteziation data is maintained in material master so that at the time of TO system can know how much quantity will be stored on which  type of pallet and accordingly system will search for the BIN or it will find out that the bin is full
    In case you do not mention it in material master then ceratinly you will get the error that please enter the palletelization data during Transfer order creation
    Regards
    Rahul

  • Storage Unit stays after L_TO_CREATE_DN

    Hi,
    I use L_TO_CREATE_DN to pick SUs (Storage Unit) and post goods movements. I give the parameter "KOMIM = 2".
    The WM Stock (LQUA table) lines disappear as expected, but the SU header data (LEIN table) stays without any change. It causes many problems.
    Any ideas ?
    Regards,

    Hi.
    By using L_TO_CREATE_DN, you are creating and confirming TO?
    When you create a TO you should get your SU assigned to it (if your storage type is not bulk or open storage etc.)... I gues that works for you since you have automated the process... So after confirming the TO, this SU should disappear (check in LS33 for your SU if it exists), but it doesn't necessarily have to disappear - e.g. if your SU has 100 cs and you picked 50 cs from it. It should still exist with qty of 50 cs.
    Instead of looking at table LEIN, check if your SU is showing in LS33.
    Regards,
    Mihailo

Maybe you are looking for