Process Order Partial confirmation (PNCF) and Final Confirmation

Hi expert,
I'm already running t-code COHVPI to mass processing process order so it status change from TECO to CLOSED. But there is an error message "process order partially confirmed". Is that true if process order must be final confirmed before it changed to CLOSED. Should we change the status of partial confirmed (PNCF) to Final confirmed (CNF) before process order CLOSED.
Please give me a suggestion.
Thank you.

Correct. Final Confirmation is THE signal to the rest of the world that that this order is DONE (at least from the GR standpoint). This will also retire the order from the APO/SNP radar.

Similar Messages

  • Process Order Basic Finish Date and Scheduled Finish Date

    Folks,
    I have a requirement from the business to be able to update the Process Order Basic Finish Date and Scheduled Finish Date independently from each other.
    In other words, update the Basic Finish Date and the Scheduled Finish Date cannot change or update the Scheduled Finish Date and the Basic Finish Date cannot change.
    I believe the reason for this is to be able to use the Basic Date to maintain the ATP accurately and keep the Scheduled Date to mark when the order was originally due from the shop floor to be able to measure if orders are being completed on time or late.
    I have worked in tnx OPUZ and had some success with other issues with these dates but I can't seem to make them work independently from each other.
    Or does anyone have any ideas how to measure proces order performance to the production schedule?
    Thank you for your help,
    Greg

    Rajesha, thank you for your reply but it doesn't solve my problem.
    Let me restate my scenario:
    I start a process order and both the basic and scheduled finish dates are the same, June 1.
    At some point, shop floor tells me they will be late and cannot deliver until June 15.
    I need to update a date in the system so the ATP and the MRP planning runs have correct information for promising customers, I will update the Basic Finish date with June 15.
    I also need to keep the original June 1 date in order to measure the shop floor performance to the production schedule to measure how early or late the  order was delivered. How can I keep the original finish date or how can I measure if a process order is early or late??
    Thank you for your help,
    Greg

  • Creating Process Orders Without a Material and Without a Master Recipe

    Hi PP experts, anyone knows if it is possible and how to do create Process Orders Without a Material and Without a Master Recipe?
    Thanks!!

    Dear,
    If you want to use a cleanout recipe
    T code CORO
    create a order w/o material for rework qty
    Make the same entries as described under Creating a Process Order With a Material. Use OPJG config to have a default operation defined for the plant and order type combination.
    Please find the required details and conditions for creating process orders without master recipe.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/89/a42cb3461e11d182b50000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar
    Edited by: R Brahmankar on Oct 13, 2008 5:12 PM

  • Process Order does Confirmations and GR even after the Process order is CNF

    Not Sure why the Formatting is lost.
    Hi Gurus,                                                                               
    I am a beginner in this area and request your help.                                                                               
    We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
    The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
    We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
    Case 1:
    1. Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only 100 is accepted.
    2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
    3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
    That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
    Case 2: (The one with the problem)
    1.  Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only the 100 is accepted.
    2.  25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
    3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
    At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
    4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
    The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
    5. The Process order  allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are  same .
    so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Suraj

    Hi Suraj,
    I am not positive, but I suspectt the problem lies in the BAPI.  It might be how you have the data set in MII, but it sounded like you are doing it correctly. 
    However there are a number of things you can do to troubleshoot your situation.
    First create a few process orders to test with. 
    Record the confirmation numbers and counters for each of the following:
    1) Do a final confirmation (for quantity of 25 instead of the 100) in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using). 
    2) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) in SE37 or BAPI in ERP using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT.
    3) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) from MII using your current transaction. 
    Review the confirmations in ERP to see if there are any differences.
    Review the confirmaitons in MII to see if there are any non visible differences (use a Tracer to retrieve the response segment from an execution of BAPI_PROCORDCONF_GETDETAIL using the recorded confirmation numbers and counters) 
    Case 1) If there are differences in the results, that should tell you how to modify your transaction to include or change the appropriate values in your inputs. 
    Case 2) If there are no differences, then it is most likely that there is something not working properly in the BAPI you are using.  It may not completely replicate the functionality in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using in ERP).  Then open a ticket, because the BAPI is not working as it should.
    Good luck,
    Mike
    Edited by: Michael Appleby on Aug 17, 2009 8:20 PM

  • Process Order accepts Confirmation & GR from BAPI even after Confirmed

    No matter what i try the formatting and CRLF go for a toss in this text.
    Hi PPPI Gurus,
    I am a beginner in this area and request your help.
    We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
    The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
    We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
    Case 1:
    1. Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only 100 is accepted.
    2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
    3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
    That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
    Case 2: (The one with the problem)
    1.  Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only the 100 is accepted.
    2.  25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
    3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
    At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
    4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
    The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
    5. The Process order  allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are  same .
    so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Suraj
    Edited by: surajprabhu on Aug 17, 2009 6:37 AM

    Hi,
    The standard SAP will allow the GR even after the Final Confirmation. The Final Confirmation is acting as a agent to change the status of the process order to CNF. thats all.
    If you want to restrict the GR then you have to do Enhancement with  use the USer Exits. Pleas try to use the User Exits PPC00009 or MBCF0001,MBCF0005
    thanks and regards
    murugesan

  • Teco customer order partially confirmed

    We have a situation where stock still remains in WIP, but we want to teco to order. This stock may be quarantined or is waiting to be reworked. Is it possible to partially teco an order? Example out of a batch of 5000, 200 pieces will remain in WIP and the rest of the order is teco'd?
    Thank  you

    Dear,
    The prerequisite for Process Order Settlement is the Process order should have the status TECO or DLV .
    Before you do the settlement you are not allowed to close the order.
    You have done the GR , everything..
    You have to do all the co settlement process like, overhead calculation, WIP calculation, variance and settlement.
    Prerequisite for Process Order Close,
    1 The order must have the status Released (REL) or Technically completed (TECO)
    2 The order balance must be 0
    3 There can be no open purchase requisitions, purchase orders.
    4 There can be no future change records from confirmation processes.
    Hope clear to you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Process order activity confirmations

    I have a requirement to write a program which automatically confirms the secondary resources in an opeation, for a specific AUFNR. The manual confirmation is done using COR6N.
    I am fetching all the relevant fields from gt_phase parameter of the bapi bapi_procord_getdetail. Now I have to do the calculations of each standard values for activity types mentioned in the secondary resources. If the total quantity to be produced is 100 kg, and if the yield is 5 kg, then I am calculating 5% time for each activities mentioned there.
    For viewing all the operations and secondary resources, the tcode is COR3.
    Now my confusion is, how should I confirm these activitis. THere are two function modules, BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT and BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT. Which one is the right one? Also, how will I pass my calculated values for activities. If we are specifying the yield parameter there, do we need to do the calculation really? Please help me...

    Function module documentation BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT is for Process Order.

  • Production Order Partial Confirmation Report

    My requirement is to write a report to get all the partial confirmation time, date and Qty of a Production Order. Which table stores the relevant information? Kindly help me.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Check with  AFRD,AFRU, AFRV  RESB, AFKO,& AFPO tables.
    Regards,
    Maha

  • Sales order Partial confirmation

    Hi,
    I have an issue:
    1. When i create the order with KIT material it is confirming the Partial quantity as
    There is no sufficient quantity.
    2. When i create the order with Standard material it is NOT confirming the Partial
    Quantity even there is no sufficient quantity. Just it is showing confirm qty 0.
    My requirement is for KIT Material also it should not do the partial confirmation.
    This requirement was working fine before Upgrade the system.
    This is very urgent. Please suggest your ideas.
    Thanks,
    Naveen

    This is not an ABAP issue. I'd suggest to move your question to SD forum to get a better/faster response. Good luck!

  • Process order dates in ECC and APO are not matching.

    Hi
    We are sending Planning order to ECC there we convert to process order.I see there is diffrent start and end dates in APO and ECC.
    But I see in CCR report I get error message material ABC has a different receipt date in SAP APO and SAP R/3.
    I am not able to reconcile there.Message says
    you should deactivate the receipt date comparison. Alternatively, you can activate the order end date comparison if the primary product is assigned to the final operation.
    I am not sure how to do this.Can anyone guide how to do the same.Also what is the root cause of issue.Why I am getting this message.
    Regards
    R

    In  APO, if the receipt date of the primary product deviates from the end date of the last activity of the order (for example, due to an offset or scheduling at the end of a fixed block), the receipt date always identifies this as inconsistent.
    You cannot rectify inconsistencies of this type by using the reconcile provided in the CIF compare/reconcile function.
    In this case, you should deactivate the receipt date comparison. Alternatively, you can activate the order end date comparison if the primary product is assigned to the final operation.
    You can use the business add-in /SAPAPO/CIF_DELTA3 Enhancements Comparison Report to deactivate individual comparisons.
    Check for the  Note 645597 in which  you can find example coding with which you can activate the order end date comparison.
    Also check notes 815509
    Thanks,
    nandha

  • Process Order Cost Analysis Target and Actual Quantity Missing

    This is related to Process order costing .
    Issue : Before activating  Material Update field in Costing view 1 of Material master , we have created few process orders and Delivered .
    Hence cost analysis shows Actual and target cost fields  Empty in COST ANALYSIS  report of  order  . After Updating field in Material master , New Process orders are calculated with Actual and Target cost .
    Solution needed : How to do Actual and Target cost estimation back in cost analysis report  for old process orders which are created before Material Update field ?

    You have deleted the Component in the BoM.
    Then you have created a production order, check if the start date of this order is after the date change in the BoM..... Can be that the component stills exists in the order ? Have you tried deleting the compoent in the order BoM ?

  • Confirmation number sequence in the process order

    Hi,
    When we create a process order , system assigns the confirmation no for each of the operation & these confirmation numbers are in sequence.
    In our case we have activity numbers in the recipe as 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040, 0050, 0060...... Subsequently we have inserted operations..now the sequence has become 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040, 0041, 0042, 0050, 0060...... Now when we create the process order, the confirmation numbers for operations 0041, 0042 comes after 0060. We have a development which has a pre-requisite that the sequence of confirmation no's should be as per sequence of operations.
    Any idea how to achieve the correct sequence of confirmation no's?
    regards,
    Mohit

    Dear Mohit,
    I have find the route cause BUT I Don't know how to fix it
    Based on Operation ID, system is creating a confirmation No
    Since you have created a operation 41 and 42,  System gives the operation ID next to 60
    Thats the reason system is giving the confirmation No after 60
    I don't know how To add operation ID in routing

  • Process Order Confirmation COR6N - By using Shift Management Functionality

    Hi,
    I want to confirm Operations/Phases by using T.Code COR6N.
    Here i want to identify which Shift i have done confirmation by using shift management functionality.
    It can be done for CORK. While doing Cofirmation for Order by using CORK, we can use this functionality.
    The same i want to use for COR6N.
    I have done as per following link
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/c0fa9a04-376a-2c10-c396-86d32ac80614
    Is there any option to use this functionality for COR6N ?
    Pl suggest
    Regards
    Nag
    Edited by: nag1975 on Mar 29, 2010 3:06 PM

    Hi Srinath,
    Go to T-code CO86 directly or go to SPRO> Production planning for process industries>process order--> operation>>confirmation and then hide the field for scrap by clicking the radio button. I think this should serve your purpose.
    Please let me know if you have any issues.
    Regards,
    Abhijeet

  • COR6 - Process order confirmation Activity

    Dear All,
    I am doing process order activity confirmation in cor6. One of my activity is "power" unit is KWH ( Kilo watt hour). While confirmation system is not allowing me to take KWH unit of power. It is taking TO ( Ton which is the base unit of measurement) and getting the following error.
    " Alternative qty unit KWH can not be converted in to base unit TO"
    Please suggest me how to solve this issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kundan Kumar

    Dear Brahmaji,
    Thanks for your quick reply. In master recipe activity type is different from the resource. I think this is the reason for the same.
    can we change this activity type manually in master recipe?
    can we find out the last amendment date in master recipe & resource?
    pls let me know if we can find out the amendment date.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kundan Kumar

  • Process order confirmation date

    Hi all,
    I am making a Zreport in PP along with the ABAPER for my client. In the report output there is one column named as "Actual finish date" which as the name suggests is the process order finished date for confirmation.
    For this I am using "GLTRIactual finish date" field from AFKO table. But in this table many of the process orders are showing the date as "00:00:0000" even though the process order is confirmed & in the order header some value for actual finish date field-GLTRI is there.
    When i see the same order in S021 the same field shows some date value.
    Since some ABAP coding is done I want to use only AFKO & not S021.
    Can any body help me to solve the problem of GLTRI not getting updated in AFKO.
    Regards,
    Manish Phatak

    Dear Vishal,
    Thanks for ur answer.
    I have already rewarded for the same.
    I will like to know that wheather it is only "closed" OR "TECO" will also update GLTRI in the table..
    Regards,
    Manish

Maybe you are looking for

  • What is the iPhoto levels tool doing that the Aperture tool isn't?

    I just bought a copy of Aperture, and I love it, except for one thing. I am used to performing quick and dirty improvements of my outdoor photos using the levels tool in iPhoto - I find it gives excellent results with minimal effort. However, I am no

  • Cannot enable 5.1 playback for stero sources (itunes etc) - Audig

    So when I first got this card, when I played music thru itunes it would play through all 6 speakers (I have a kilpsch ultra 5. setup). I had to reformat so I download the drivers from Creative's website (which didn't include all the programs the orig

  • 3750-x and vlan dot1q tag native command

    Hello, I have a 3750-X stack with the following HW & SW revisions: Cisco-3750-x-stack>show version Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9NPE-M), Version 15.0(2)SE4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techs

  • Transporting Transport Request from One System to other

    Hi All, I want to create tranport request from ECC 5.0 System to ECC 6.0 system. Please let me know steps for creating transport request and transporting transport request from one system to other system. Thanks in advance. Best Regds, zubera

  • BW STRESS TESTING

    We want to do stress testing on BW using Load runner, what kind of scenarios should be tested for this purpose. I know we cannot run BW queries on Load runner, did anyone work stress testing for BW ? Thanks