Process Order Settlement posted with wrong amount to FI and COPA

Experts,
I have configured the system to post the production variance to FI and COPA with the help of allocation structure and PA transfer structure.
Mat                    Text                                                                             Plan     Actual
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
50.00
55.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000087
140.00-
140.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
20.00
0.77
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
50.00
0.78
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
10.00
0.80
994340
Machine Depriciation Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/DEP40
10.00
1.10
0.00
81.55-
System Posted Entries
1. Mat Consumption on Order
RM Consumption - Dr 55
RM Stock           - Cr  55
2. Mat received from Order
Fin. Mat Stock - Dr   140(A)
COGM            - Cr    140(B)
3. After Settlement of Order
COGM            - Dr    140(B)
Prod. Variance - Cr  140
4. Post Goods Issue
COGS                - Dr   140
Fin. Mat Stock    - Cr    140 (A)
Issue is settled variance is 140 and according to me it should be 81.55
Standard Cost in Material (140) - total consumption (55) - all confirmed activities (3.45) = _roduction Variance (81.55)
Please correct me if i am not getting the concept....
Thanks
Sagar Chinchkar

Sir,
I have analysed the issue.
Actually after the new settings for COPA after settlement system crediting the Order with COst element and debiting the Profitability segments.
Below results carried out by the system
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000087
14.00-
14.00-
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
0.00
14.00
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
14.00-
0.00
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
5.00
5.50
994320
Diesel Cost New
0.00
5.50-
Diesel Cost New
5.00
0.00
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
1.00
1.10
994330
Electricity Cost
0.00
1.10-
Electricity Cost
1.00
0.00
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
2.00
2.20
994310
Labour Cost New
0.00
2.20-
Labour Cost New
2.00
0.00
994340
Machine Depriciation Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/DEP40
1.00
1.10
994340
Machine Depriciation Cost
0.00
1.10-
Machine Depriciation Cost
1.00
0.00
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
5.00
5.00
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
0.00
5.00-
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
I think while settling the order system due to 0 impact system post total amount of COGM as Production variance.
I have done the settings as suggested
Under PA Trf Str.. kept "Costs / Revenues" radio button.
KKS2 is not showing any variance, may be i have not set WIP settings is this because of that?
if i change this setting to normal no cost components values flowing to COPA system post actual variance.
Waiting for your reply.....
Thanks
Sagar C'kar

Similar Messages

  • Brazil - STO process, input VAT posting with wrong plant

    Hello,
    During our STO process between two brazil plants (both belong to the same company code), we face the following bug.
    Issuing plant: BRA1
    Receiving plant: BRA5
    The accounting document behind the GI posting include the following lines:
    1  |  99  |  stock account  |  - value  |  BRA1
    2  |  89  |  stock account  |  + value  |  BRA5
    3  |  40  |  input VAT account  |  + value  |   BRA1
    4  |  50  |  output VAT account  |  - value  |  BRA1
    For the VAT posting, the system takes the transaction key TXO.
    But we would expect that the input VAT is posted to the receiving plant and not to the issuing plant.
    Has anyone a idea, which setting control the plant determination behind TXO?
    Thanks.
    Regards
    Ralf

    HI,
    For the VAT posting, the system takes the transaction key TXO.
    But we would expect that the input VAT is posted to the receiving plant and not to the issuing plant.
    Has anyone a idea, which setting control the plant determination behind TXO?
    see i don't have any knowledge about brazil STO process
    but about SAP process
    I think your STO is link with SD process,if Yes can you chec from SD discsuiing with SD consultant
    as per IndIa is concern, vat comes FROM tax code or FROM SD side and for same company code STO, there is no tax code filed in PO,so from SD side
    check OBYC also and check that vat condition also
    Regards
    kailas Ugale

  • PROCESS ORDER SETTLEMENT - KO88

    Hi!
    As per my knowledge KO88 will be done for OHDS and for Material.  OHDS settlement will be done in month ending which results the difference between KSII and KP26.
    Can anybody explain how the accounting entry will be generated at the time of Process order settlement of material i.e. KO88. 
    Sreenivas

    Hi
    Settlement entries are same as in production order.  No diff
    However, u must be aware settlement entries are dependent on status of process order.  If status is DLV or TECO wip is calcelled and variances are calculated.  If status if PREL or REL or PDLV wip entries are posted. 
    Hope you have made settings in WIP for offsetting entries
    Pls assign points if this clarifies else send query with more explanation

  • Error during Process order settlement

    Hi Gurus,
    i am facing problem during the process order settlement. an error is occured is as follows: Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
    actually this V0 tax code is assing to the ZTAXIN procedure & which is also assign to country. i couldn't get why it ask tax code during the settlement.
    In Process order Itemization i find the 2 GL ( Element) in which there is one consumption GL & second is COFG sold GL. from GL Master i remove both GL Tax category & also remove the click from posting without tax allowed. till i am facing this problem?
    Please help me to overcome this issue.
    Point will be rewarded if question solved.
    Than'x
    Dhananjay R

    hi gopan,
    Than'x for attention on my question. till my problem is not solved. during the process order why it hit the tax code? would u please guide me how to find the tax code assignment which hit during the process order settlement?
    i have check all the Tax related setting till this issue not solved. ( Check calculation procedure (OBYG), Tax code assignment (FTXP), also check the Tax Account Integration (OB40).
    also i remove tax related assignment from the GL master related to specific gl which are display in component structure.
    pls help me to solve this issue..
    Than'x
    Dhananjay

  • Can a credit memo be posted with zero amount?

    Can a credit memo be posted with zero amount? What would it mean, that the goods qty have been posted free of cost?
    Pls reply...
    Thanks,
    Swati.

    yes, It depends upon the procurement...
    I have raised a PO for 100 pieces, But the Vendor will supply only in Dozens..
    That means for 100 pices , we will receive 9 Dozens( 108 pieces)..
    Similarly some times if it's a Fragile material , the Vendor will send more pieces as a buffer..
    If IR Qty > GR Qty , it becomes Qty variance..
    Similarly I received 100 Qty & 5 pieces are Sub-Standard, then I will raise Credit memo for that...
    Edited by: Manohar Raju on Apr 30, 2008 4:58 PM

  • Process order settlement

    Hi,
    when i do process order settlement , system gives error message that "maintain the settlement rule of the sender".
    Process order contains two co-product and i have given details in "joint production" in MRP II tab.
    When i checked order settlement rule in COR2 i couldn't find anything and when i try to insert new settlement rule system gives error message .
    Sunoj

    error message when executing KKS2
    KV     206     1     OIT 20000095/1     No suitable settlement rule found for object OP0000200000950001          Checking and processing orders

  • Process order settlement to cost center

    Hi,
    We have a requirement to settle only the quantity to material and the costs to
    cost center from the process orders. This is to ensure the materials are
    handled as non-valuated and the COGM is computed from the goods consumption
    postings.
    The process orders will have both co products and by products as well.
    There is also one more requirement to allow Purchase orders against the non-
    valuated materials.
    I am planning to propose the following :-
    1) To make the materials valuated but set the standard price to zero to give
    the effect of non-valuated materials and at the same time can also raise
    purchase orders because otherwise non-valuated materials cannot be used to
    raise Purchase orders.
    2) When goods receipt happens from the process order the actual costs of the
    process order will remain as it is in the process order since the standard
    price of the FG is zero and only the quantity will be received into inventory.
    3) When process order settlement happens the full actual costs will be settled
    to a price difference account and cost center tied to the price difference
    account.
    Do you guys see any flaws in the above design?
    Edited by: FICO Consultant on Feb 21, 2012 4:28 AM

    Answered

  • Process Order Settlement Rule by Order Type

    Hi Experts
    Our Client  a requirement to have Process Order Settlement by Order Type please let me know how it can be achieved
    In SAP  a Process Order Variance is settled via the following Combination in OBYC  :-
    1 Chart of Accounts
    2 Transaction PRD
    3 Valuation Modifier
    4 General Modifier
    5 Valuation Class
    6 GL Account
    Can   this account assignment based on the Order Type ?
    Thanks
    Suman

    Dear Suman,
    Normally, Order Types serves a different purpose. We can maintain default settlement rule, Costing Variants, Settlement Profiles, Number ranges etc at Order Type Level.
    It is not possible to directly manage the Order Types in the Account Assignment in OBYC.
    Thanks & Kind Regards
    Umapathi G

  • Can i order a MBP with backlit English/Arabic Keyboard and got it shipped?

    can i order a MBP with backlit English/Arabic Keyboard and got it shipped?

    The answer depends entirely on where you are. Are you in a country where that keyboard layout is offered by Apple Stores, an Apple Online Store, or Apple resellers? If so, the answer is yes. If not, the answer is likely to be no.

  • Problem with process order settlement

    Hi,
    I'm having a problem while doing settlment for process orders. I have two types of process orders AJWV and AJW0; AJWV works for center 2000 and AJW0 works for center 1000. When I calculate variances both work good. The problem comes when I try to settle them. For AJWV orders there are three finance documents generated, FI document, Controlling document and Profit Center document. But for AJW0 it's just generated Controlling document and Profit Center document.
    Both order types have the same settlement profile assinged
    The settlement rule for both orders is to Cost Center, full settlement 100%
    Both orders are produced for Sales order with valuated stock
    I already checked the account assigment for the materials corresponding to each order, and both account determination are ok.
    What can be the problem so the AJW0 is not posting to FI variances?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Yes for AJWV the FI entry was generated.

  • Process order settlement configuration

    Dear experts,
    I'm trying to run the end month process to settle and properly take the costs to the materials as per confirmed trough activity types with price mantained, but really dont know the exact process to follow, can anyone please explan this process and the config needed, does this has something to do with CO88 or KO88
    I see some config trough transactions OKG1 to OKG8 is this config mandatory? or what config needs to be done
    When I run KO88 for an order that is confirmed and delivered and status TECO i get this message "There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible" 
    Your help here will be highly appreciated
    Thanks in advance

    Hi
    It seems RA Key is specified in your Prod order.. But you have not calculated WIP and tried to settle directly.. thats why you got this message...
    IMG > Controllin > Prod Cost Cont > Cost Obj Con > Prod cost by order > Period end > WIP / Variance....
    you need to do settings in the nodes here... I suggest refer Building block library.... Type " SAP Building block library" in google and refer the BB Library for CO-Product Costing
    br, Ajay M

  • Process Order Settlement without GR or GI

    Hello,
    I have a quick question that I need help with please. A process order has no Goods Receipt yet (only consumption) as of month-end when we settle all orders. Will such an order settle and post an entry to GL even though it is not completed yet?
    Also, if an order has Goods Receipt but no consumption (I know it doesnt make sense, but it is an error order), will it still settle?
    Thanks,
    Gligor.

    Hi,
    If I understood correctly, you have consumptions of RM from your inventory but you dont have production GR.  You wanted to do the order settlement. 
    - Why do you want to settle order that is not completed in production?  If there are any expenses on the order during the month, shouldn't these expenses be tracked as WIP? 
    - Also, for the case where there are GR without GI, are there any activity consumptions on the process order? 
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • Process order settlement driven by T030 & TKA3C vs settlement from recipe

    We settle all process order cost (consumption, production, and variances) to the cost center (or P&L).   These settlements are driven by a hard coded structure (by valuation class) and tables T030 & TKA3C.
    I suggest that this is not common SAP practice.  This is certainly not SAP best practice.   I believe this has resulted in the proliferation of valuation classes and cost elements (in order to settle production differently.)   Does it make sense to have over 300 valuation classes?   Can you please confirm?
    I suggest that we only need to settle production order variances and activity cost!  The correct settlement should be defined as part of the resource (and recipe group).   We already define this but they have no consequence because of the configuration of our SAP.  Should settlement should be recipe driven and not material driven!  It would not mater what the valuation class of the consumed materials, or the produced materials.  Settlement would be defined by the resource attached to the recipe. 
    How does SAP overide the resource (cost center), and activity (cost center) attached to the recipe with tables T030 & TKA3C?

    The forum [FPM - General|Enterprise Performance Management (SAP EPM); in which you originally posted your question deals mainly with the financial performance applications otherwise known as Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) carrying the BusinessObjects brand.   Your question pertains to SAP [ERP Financials Controlling|SAP ERP Financials - Controlling; which is covered by another forum.  Therefore your message has been moved.  Please adjust any bookmarks you might have and post to the appropriate area in the future, that way you are assured you will have the right audience reading your posts.
    Thanks and best regards,
    [Jeffrey Holdeman|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Jeffrey+Holdeman]
    SAP Labs, LLC
    BusinessObjects Division
    Americas Applications Regional Implementation Group (RIG)

  • Sales order settlement Problem with Internal Order

    HI Dear Friends,
    How are you, I am fine.
    We have 1 Process here Related with SD & FI/CO
    for 1 process we have treat as a small Project,
    the process is we have make 1st Contract and create Internal order and assign Internal order to Contract
    then Create Sales Release Order and assing Internal Order in Settlement Rule in Sales order.
    then we create billing ref to Contract and then we did PGI.
    1) at billing time the Internal Order is Updatting
    2) at PGI time internal Order is not updating  - what is the right process - the internal; Order will be updating or not
    then we have to do Sales order Settlement thtough Trasaction code VA88
    what will happned at this level pleas be advicsed becos when i do this it is giving messges not is toi be settled.
    Friends I did all exercise complete except Settlement trough T-Code VA88.
    When I am going to do this settlement VA88 it is giving messages there is nothing to be settle.
    What I have to do please be advised.
    I did all these activities:
    1)     Create sales Contract
    2)     Create Internal Order
    3)     Assign Internal Order to sales Contract
    4)     Crate Release Sales Order
    5)     Assign Internal Order to Release Sales Order
    6)     Delivery & PGI
    7)     Billing         (at billing time the internal Order should be Updates (pls advise it should be or not)
    8)     Last is Settlement VA88 u2013 this time it is giving Error.
    When I settle the Sales order to internal order what will happens. Which value will update.
    Please reply me frds,
    Thanks,
    Srem.

    hello Lakshmipathi,
    Thanks a lot for your reply.
    I tried to change the requierement class in order to put one with special stock E as you explained, but i still have my weird schedule line. When i put the item in the order it is 0 stock for today, but stock find in 12 days either if there is stock or no(unrestricted stock i mean).
    If i change the RDD in more than 12 days the stock is available for the date requested.
    If you have an idea of what could be wrong because on my case i want the schedule line to be at 0 while the sales order reservation has not been processed (via MB1B/412/E) and once the stock movement is done the schedule line has to be find.
    I dont know if im clear enought..
    To be more clear,  i want the schedule line based on the "sales order stock" and not on the "unrestricted stock".
    thanks for your help!
    Guillaume

Maybe you are looking for