Product Cost sheet from BW

Hi,
I would like to know if somone has generated the cost sheet report for product/material combination in BW.
I have a requirement for report as follows:
Cost Sheet for FG 101
Qty Uom Price Resource Cost Element
Stage 1:
RM1
RM2
Activity 1
Overhead
Stage 2:
Stage1
RM4
Activity 2
Stage3:
Stage2
PM1
PM2
Total Costs for FG 101:
Total Per Unit costs FG 101:
The costs and quantity must be same as explored in CK13N transaction. Howver, the organization of report must be of above mentioned patttern.
Regards,
Ankita

Requirement postponed by business, so withdraing the thread

Similar Messages

Product Cost Sheet report from BW

Hi,
I would like to know if somone has generated the cost sheet report for product/material combination in BW.
I have a requirement for report as follows:
Cost Sheet for FG 101
                                          Qty     Uom    Price    Resource    Cost Element
Stage 1:
   RM1
   RM2
   Activity 1
   Overhead
Stage 2:
   Stage1
   RM4
   Activity 2
Stage3:
    Stage2
    PM1
    PM2
Total Costs for FG 101:
Total Per Unit costs FG 101:
The costs and quantity must be same as explored in CK13N transaction. Howver, the organization of report must be of above mentioned patttern.
Regards,
Ankita
Moderator Message: Not ABAP-related
Edited by: kishan P on Nov 8, 2010 8:45 AM

Requirement postponed by business, so withdraing the thread

Cost Sheet from SAP

Dear All,
I am consulting with Cement Industry client, here we have only one Final Product i.e., Cement. We implemented SAP FI and CO module 2 yrs back but till now they are not using Controlling module properly in SAP. Now they need total costing from SAP, mainly Cost Sheet as per Indian cement industrys format. We are following repetetive manufacturing process, by using Product Cost Collectors. Can any body explain what to check for getting Cost Sheet and useful T.codes please.
Regards,
Prasad

The process in SAP costing is you set a standard cost estimate for a material (say Cement bag) and release it to the material master. The cost estimate shall be with quantity structure (i.e with a Bill of material and routing). This will serve as the standard for all production during the year (or any period you decide). To do this you need to set up a costing variant T-code OKKN)
You also need to design a cost component structure created OKTZ to capture various cost element that would be involved in representing the cost of making the cement bag. This can be tailored to suit the format regulated by the industry.
For e.g
Raw materials to include powder of alumina, silica, lime, iron oxide, and magnesium oxide)
Conversion (kiln operations cost)
Pulverizing
Depreciation (of kiln etc)
Labour cost
Packaging etc.
Once you have assigned, you can run the cost estimate through CK40N collectively or cK11N individually.
Cost sheet or costing sheet within SAP is a terminology used to allocate overheads to products. You can also use this feature (found under SPRO>Controlling>PCP>Basic settings>Overheads) This feature will ensure to transfer cost from cost centers to the products on any preferred basis.

Selection of Costing Sheet in Production Order

Hi friends,
I have one query, details of which are as follows.
Costing sheet in Requirement Class - Blank
This requirement class assigned to Requirement type which was derived in Sales order through Material master and hence Costing sheet in Sales order is blank.
Costing Sheet in Valuation variant (Plan) is Z0010 which is assigned to Costing Variant (Plan). It was assigned to Order type.
Costing sheet in Valuation variant (Actual) is Z0020 which is assigned to Costing variant (Actual). It was assigned to Order type.
I have created a new Valuation variant T01 in which Costing sheet is blank. It was assigned to a Particular Plant.
When i am creating the Production order with reference to the Sales order in that Particular plant, system is deriving the Costing sheet as per Valuation variant (Plan) which is common instead of picking from the plant specific valuation variant.
So, its calculating overheads and is impacting our Goods receipt valuation (In this plant, GR Valuation is as per Plan cost of the Production order).
I tried different combinations, and finally observed that it is picking the Costing sheet from the valuation variant (Plan) which is common and not Plant specific.
Is this system behavior correct as per SAP Standard?
Kindly advise on the same
Regards
Madhusekhar Gupta G

Hi Madhu
1. Production order gets coating sheet from the valuation variant assigned to order type
2. The valuation variant that you assign to Plant is for standard cost estimate only
3. For your case, create a new costing variant without costing sheet and assign the same to the order type for this plant
You can assign different costing variant to the same order type per plant
Br. Ajay M

Implementing cost sheets in BW

Hi,
We are planning to provide cost sheets from BW.
I need to understand the following:
1 - What are the datasources needed to implement the cost sheets.
2 - Cost sheet is prepared from costs for a particular product/material from a production order.
3 - So what data I would need to deliver a cost sheet from BW?
4 - Also we need costing sheet per Work Center (which is a production line) instead of material wise. How can that be done?
Please educate me for the best possible alternatives.

Hi Debanshu,
I am sorry to see that you couldn't get any valuable help for your question about how to extract costing sheets.
I have a similar requirement here in the company I work for. Have you make any progress in the costing sheet extractor? Any idea will be welcome. If I find or develop anything that I think can be useful for you I'll let you know.
Regards,
Raimundo

Product Costing: 0CO_PC_PCP_01 0CO_PC_PCP_02

Hi Gurus,
I'd like to use one of 0CO_PC_PCP_01 and 0CO_PC_PCP_02 datasources to extract product costing details from tables KEKO / CKIS.
It seams that both are working correctly, but both are not extracting the detail I need. They extract data aggregated buy the CKIS-ELEMT field, while in CKIS table, the cost is slpitted in more rows each with different Origin Group as Subdivision of Cost Element (CKIS-HRKFT).
I'd like to extract costs at this detail and, of course, the field CKIS-HRKFT.
Had anyone of you already had the same problem?
Is there a standard datasoure already providing this kind of information, or have I to enhance the standard (0CO_PC_PCP_01 or 0CO_PC_PCP_02) splitting each aggregated row AT the CKIS-HRKFT detail?
Thanks!!!
Regards!
Matteo.

This is not a delta-enabled datasource so you need to do a full-update (with selection) everytime. If you want to restrict it on dates, just run the infopackage for full month's selection (Include the prev month, if you want to bring new products created last month but not brought over in the last extraction).
Since it is a full-update, it should be going to an ODS with over-write, is it not so?

Delete Product Cost Collector

How can we remove a Product Cost Collector from the COst Object Hierarchy? Can we delete the PCC itself?
Thank you

Go to chaNGE MODE .
Edit -> deletion flag -> set

Daily Product Cost

Hi,
Is it possible to get a daily product cost. Can any one explain me the implications for getting daily product cost from PP point of view and also CO point of view. Whether Repetitive manufacturing solves this issue? Please reply immediately.
Regards
Prashanth

Hi Ashok,
I am asking is it possible to get daily product cost report. What are implications or difficulties in getting daily product cost report from CO point of view. From CO point of view we need to settle the production orders daily where settlemet is a monthly activity and also the allocations. I request you to tell me what are implications in doing the daily product costing to arrive at daily product cost report.
Regards
Prashanth

Costing sheet in control tab of production order

In OPL8 iam able to configure default cost accountings for production order type but why costing sheet is coming by default in production order costing section.
Is there anyway to hide that costing sheet (AUFK-KALSM) from display to the users without effecting any cost calculation in the background.
The purpose behind this is not to let users mess with costing sheet selection while creation. this is possible with screen variant but is there any standard settings for order type?
Thanks in advance.

Dear Sprint,
No
In my understanding we do not not have any Std setting for archiving your requirement
Use screen variant or check for any exit
Regards
Madhu

Varaince settlement and costing sheet in REM and Production order

for REM, repetetive manufacturing, what's the difference between REM and production order in terms of variance settlement and settlement profile design? what's the difference between process order and production order in terms of variance settlement and settlement profile design?
for actual overhead(fixed and variable), can it be calculated automatically by costing sheet? user is very angry to input actual overhead by jounal entry. also how about plan scrap, how to define it in configuration? besides order confirmation, where can I input actual scrap?

For variances, there is no difference between the 3 diferrent orders. The settlement profile can also be the same. The real difference from a CO perspective concerns the calculation of WIP and the settlement rule. Process orders and production orders normally use a full settlement rule (though periodic settlement is also possible) and WIP is calculated based on actual cost. Repetitive orders only use periodic settlement and WIP is valued at target cost.
From an overhead perspective, there is no difference between the 3 types of orders. Overhead sheets are assigned through the costing variant and costs are applied through period-end process.
Plan scrap is maintained in master data, either in material master, routing (receipe for process orders), or bill of material. Acttual scrap usually happens based on the quantity of components issued to the order during confirmation or by the amount of scrap reported during confirmation. If you are backflushing components, as you normally would do for repetitive, then you can adjusted the consumed quantities by doing an additional goods issue to the order (movement type 261).
thanks,

Cost sheets--PRODUCT COSTING

Hi Friends,
In Product costing i have two scenarios-- MAKE TO STOCK AND MAKE TO SALE ORDER.
For make to stock the costing variant will be PPC1
AND for make to sale order the costing variant will be PPC4
we can give different cost sheets for PPC1 AND PPC4
But in in cost object controlling for the costing variants PPP1 (Planing) AND PPP2 (Actual) we can give only one cost sheet which is used while creating production order.
How to provide different cost sheets(Mak to stock and Make to sale order) here in cost object controlling also?
Any ideas ? Full points will be awarded.
Regards
siva

You are unable to attach separate costing sheets to PPC1 and PPC4 because the valuation variant in the two costing variants is the same. (based on the standard config that I can see)
SAP does not allow the valuation variant for a costing variant to be changed after creation. To get a different cost sheet requires a different valuation variant, which would require building a new costing variant - we did do that and named it ZPC4.
If you want the valuation different BY PLANT, go to the valuation variant tab of your costing variant and look for a selection "Valuation Variant/Plant" (in 5.0 this is a button in the upper left corner of the screen). Here you can make plant specific valuation variant configuration. We use this for manufacturing plants - all plants use ZPC2 costing variant for standard cost to be released, but each plant has their own costing sheet as defined in "Valuation Variant/Plant"
Just remember to test, test, test.
As to this question: In such case make to stock and make to order can not be done in the same Plant--Right? our make to order is for non-valuated stock, so all costs move to the sales at the standard value of the actual quantities used. Depending on what is added to make Cost of good sold, I don't know how you would get the "Actual" on to the manufacturing order so that it would settle to the sales order. - it is after all a manufacturing order. have you tried doing the COGS on the sales order instead of the mfg order?
Obviously this question is a bit out of my usual practice. Someone else may have experience with this. But one other thought to keep in mind with your costing variants - which costing/valuation variant is used to release standard cost for inventory purposes? To me that is the value that you want associated with production orders because mfg variances will generate from that cost.
Hope some of this is helpful
Althea

Allocation of cost from service cost center to production cost center

Dear sir ,
Will I use to distribute the cost from service department to production department and that cost centers also using for activity planing will get currect result in product costing ?

Hello,
Can you clarify what you want to do ?
Allocation of cost from service cost centers to production cost centers can be done with the help of Assessment / Distribution cycles and you can do a activity planning using the same costs as well. The steps for activity planning would be as under:
1. Create primary cost planning in the service and production cost centers (KP06)
2. Create activity planning in the production cost centers (KP26) without any rate
3. Run assessment / distribution cycles to transfer cost from the service cost centers to production cost centers (KSUB / KSVB), in case you are not transferring based on activity quantity then also do SKF planning in KP46
4. Run plan cost splitting in case you have more then one activity type (do config for splitting structure beforehand) (KSS4)
5. Calculate Plan price for the production cost center activity types (KSPI)
BR // SG

Fields to be activated from Material Master for product costing.

hi guys.
our MM person is creating BDC for uploading master data.
we have to do product costing in second phase.
what fileds we have to activate now, from accouting & costing view???
is it necessory to activate LIFO/FIFO relevancy indicator for product costing??
will it affect to inventory valuation directly???
can we actiavte the fileds afterwords???

Dear Mr.Taj,
Where's the quantity structure field in Accounting 2 view?
Do u mean which's in Costing 1 view?
<b>Dear MR.Patil,before doing cost roll up & release all the fields should be having proper values (inputs).</b>
Later on also u can activate.I mean during material creation itself if u ensure these checks,this will help you in taking the cost rollup smoothly.
Or else you have to correct those errors at the time of costing.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
Mangalraj

Cost sheet without activity(Product costing)

Hi,
In our company code all earlier created cost sheets have activities, which are assigned in cost element group. And in base of the cost sheet, this cost element group has been assigned.
Now in the new process, for which the cost sheet to be prepared, there are only overheads and no activities.
Is it necessary to create cost element group?
Is it necessary to assign the cost element group in Base?
Any activity to be created by assigning zero value in KP26 for routing purpose?
Please suggest.
Prakash.

Hi,
Yes. You need to assign the cost element group where the base cost shall be available to calculate the surcharge on the basis of overhead percentages.
Activities shall not be found in Costing sheet. It is assigned in work center and KP26, you enter the planned prices. That is separate. In costing sheet you need to define overhead percentages.
Trust this helps much!
Cheers!

Product costing error while defining posting rules

Hi Friends,
When I'm trying to define posting rules for settling WIP using OKG8,
I get an error msg "GL account 7000100 cannot be created as a cost element" and the aforesaid account is WIP (P&L account).
The long text of the error msg is as follows:
G/L account 7000100 cannot be created as a cost element
Message no. KQ119
Diagnosis
When maintaining the posting rules for passing on results analysis data to Financial Accounting, you entered a G/L account that is defined as a primary cost element in cost and revenue element accounting. This is not allowed. You must enter a G/L account in the posting rules that is not defined as a cost element.
System Response
The entry invalid.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Enter a G/L account for which no cost element is specified in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting.
You can change the message type with user-defined error management (transaction OPR4_KKA). What should be observed when you enter a G/L account in a posting rule that is defined as a primary cost element in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting? You need to define a CO account assignment so that the posting defined in the posting rule can be executed. You do this with transaction OKB9 (default account assignment) or OKC9 (substitution), or using the default account assignment in the cost element master.
Could anyone suggest me on this.
The steps that I've already defined as far as the account are concerned:
1. Have defined the aforesaid account as a cost element
2. Assigned Prodn. C CTR in OKB9 agnst the same.
But then I dont understand why the system pops up this msg, saying, cannot be created as a cost element, wherein the account is already a cost element.
Plz suggest
regards
sandhya

Hiya,
WIP accounts (neither Inventory nor Offset) should NEVER be created as Cost Elements.
In most manufacturing scenarios, costs are tracked on the P&L. During period-end, since there is the risk of writing off some issues to the Production/Process/Sales Order, SAP has introduced the complex but ingenious system called Results Analysis that moves the balance of all open Orders to the Balance Sheet.
If the Order balance is (+)ve, the P&L is credited and the Balance Sheet is debited and vice versa. When you display the Order costs at period-end, the WIP costs are not considered. In order to calculate WIP, we have separate RA GL accounts that track costs independently of the Orders. Therefore, these are never created as Cost Elements. Creating these as Cost Elements would force the system to inadvertently post the WIP costs back on the Order (alongwith posting these to the B/S??? - an unimaginable situation).
At period-end, you have postings like:
Dr WIP Inventory Account
Cr WIP Offset Account
and, this is reversed at settlement:
Cr WIP Offset Account
Dr WIP Inventory Account
Along with this, the system calculates the Actual COS for the finished product. Neither of the two WIP accounts used above is created as a Cost Element. If you have created any of these as Cost Elements, the system will not allow you to save OKG8. Delete the Cost Element and then try saving the posting rule.
(PS: The "Cost Element" field in this screen has a different use. It is used to specify if a Secondary Cost Element from the RA Update table should be posted to a G/L Account. This is not meant for Primary Cost Elements. I think these Secondary CEs are of type 31 (requires confirmation - no SAP access right now). As you may have guessed, you can only enter either the RA Category or this Secondary CE).
You may also delete the OKB9 assignment to the Cost Centre. It is redundant.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

Product Cost sheet from BW

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for