Project.xpj is modified in multi-user setting

We work with 6 people on our project and the project is under
source control.
Now if someone gets the latest version of the project, the
<miscproperties> section of the Project.xpj is modified as
follows:
before:
<miscproperties>
<matchedpair>
<name>vc::database</name>
<value>
http://patfs:8080/|PWCLA|AFASGROEP\CLA</value>
</matchedpair>
</miscproperties>
After:
<miscproperties>
<matchedpair>
<name>vc::database</name>
<value>
http://patfs:8080/|PWTRI|AFASGROEP\TRI</value>
</matchedpair>
</miscproperties>
Can this be avoided, as this seems to be a totally
unnecessary modification. Can this value be altered to a fixed
value?

"totally unnecessary modification" to you, perhaps, but not
to RoboHelp's internal workings. Several RH internal files are
maintained as machine-specific, not project-specific. However, none
of this gets transmitted to the output.
What problem is manifesting itself due to this un-fixed
value?
Good luck,
Leon

Similar Messages

Multi-user set-up

Naive newbie question:
What is the usual method for making tables available to multiple users?
If I log in as user a and create a table, then try to access it as user b, I can access tables in a's schema as a.table.
How do I make the table available to all users so they don't have to keep qualifying it with the schema name? Or is there some better approach to setting up a multi-user d/b?
Which manual best covers these issues?
Thanks,
-Andy-

As user b, enter:
CREATE SYNONYM table FOR a.table ;
Or, if user a wants ALL users to access the table, then as user a, enter:
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM table FOR a.table ;
(Note that user a will need the CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM privelege).

Set multi user column with PowerShell used to work in 2010 but no longer works in 2013

In SharePoint 2010 I used PowerShell to set the value of multi user people columns and it worked really well. I attempt to use the same PowerShell to set the same column type in SharePoint 2013 and it fails.
here is the PowerShell that I use in 2010:
$web = Get-SPWeb "http://intranet"
$list = $web.lists["TestList"]
$item = $list.items.add()
$item["Title"] = "Test multi user column"
$users = @("Domain\user1", "Domain\user2")
$userList = new-object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValueCollection
foreach($user in $users)
$spUser = $web.EnsureUser($user)
$userValue = new-object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValue($web, $spUser.ID, $spUser.Name)
$userList.Add($userValue)
$item["MultiUserColumn"] = $userList
$item.update()
I have used this on three SharePoint 2013 farms with differing results. On two of them I receive an error when running $item.update(): Exception calling "Update" with "0" argument(s): "Invalid look-up value. A look-up
field contains invalid data. Please check the value and try again."
If I take one of the users out of the $users list then it works fine, but it will not allow multiple users to be set with PowerShell. I can use the GUI to add more than one user but not PowerShell.
Does anyone know if these methods have changed in 2013? I haven't been able to find anyone else with this issue.
mmm... coffee...

Not sure but maybe something to do with casting. Below is the code snippet from one of the blogs. Try modifying your script like below and see if still you get the error
[Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValueCollection]$lotsofpeople = New-Object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValueCollection
$user1 = $w.EnsureUser("domain\user1");
$user1Value = New-Object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValue($w, $user1.Id, $user1.LoginName)
$user2 = $w.EnsureUser("domain\user2");
$user2Value = New-Object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValue($w, $user2.Id, $user2.LoginName);
$lotsofpeople.Add($user1Value);
$lotsofpeople.Add($user2Value);
$i["lotsofpeoplefield"] = $lotsofpeople;
$i.Update();
#-or-
$l.Fields["lotsofpeoplefield"].ParseAndSetValue($i,$lotsofpeople);
$i.Update();
Reference to the link
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/20831.sharepoint-a-complete-guide-to-getting-and-setting-fields-using-powershell.aspx
Geetanjali Arora | My blogs |

How to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1 and 6.1 server..(Urgently)

Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

Hi. A JDBC connection pool is a set of identical, interchangeable, pre-made
connections, and the controls to make sure only one user uses a particular
connection at any one time. If you want to have different DBMS users, you can
have a separate pool for each DBMS user, which may contain as many or few
connections as you want. Some applications has a pool for the accounting
applications, and another for the sales applications etc. Some do have a
separate pool for john, jane, joe etc, each with one connection. Pools
can be created and destroyed dynamically using the dynamic pool API.
Joe
softstar wrote:
>
Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

Error in setting up Multi-user RPD

Hi
I've managed to set up a local MUD RPD on my laptop for testing purposes. I am able to make updates and then check these into the shared RPD. However when trying to access the shared RPD I receive the message that I am only able to update the RPD in Read-Only mode.
What I want to know is have I missed a step in cecking the updates into the shared RPD which has left a lock on the shared RPD?
The following files are listed in the shared directory:
modified subset of shared_samplesales.001
modified subset of shared_samplesales.002
shared_samplesales.000
shared_samplesales.001
shared_samplesales.002
shared_samplesales.002.csv
shared_samplesales.mhl
shared_samplesales.rpd
Regards
Adnan

Hi
I may have the answer. I copied the file into a different folder and I was able to open the file in offline mode.
It seems that when you set the multi-user RPD in the Tool>Options>Multiuser the folder that you specify here automatically any repository in this folder can only be opened as read-only. I changed the foler path to where I copied the the RPD to and low and behold I was only able to open the file in read-only mode.
A

Firefox 4 multi user environment in linux: How to set global settings?

<blockquote>Locking duplicate thread.<br>
Please continue here: [/questions/826921]</blockquote><br>
Hi,
We used to be able to change settings in all.js file in FF 3.x.x platform, for changing settings like, proxy, authentication, etc. We installed FF 4.0.1 in linux, but, I can't find the all.js file to change any of the global settings in FF 4.0.1.
Could you please point me how to changeglobal settings in FF 4.x version?
thanks in advance.

Hi. A JDBC connection pool is a set of identical, interchangeable, pre-made
connections, and the controls to make sure only one user uses a particular
connection at any one time. If you want to have different DBMS users, you can
have a separate pool for each DBMS user, which may contain as many or few
connections as you want. Some applications has a pool for the accounting
applications, and another for the sales applications etc. Some do have a
separate pool for john, jane, joe etc, each with one connection. Pools
can be created and destroyed dynamically using the dynamic pool API.
Joe
softstar wrote:
>
Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

Set Database Back to Multi User from Single User

I am using SharePoint Services 3.0 (SP1) with default configuration options, which installs the Microsoft##SSEE instance of SQL to my local C:\ drive.
While attempting to relocate the files to another drive, I set one of the databases (as recommended) to Single User by using the SQL Server Management Express tool.
I cannot now reset that database to Multi User, even by executing the query
exec sp_dboption 'database_name', 'single user', ''FALSE'
again by using the Management Express Tool.
Can someone please help, in plain english???? Thanks

I have similar issue.
I have took backup of WSUS (Windows Server 2002 R2) Windows internal database using SQL Server 2008 Management Studio and restored on Windows Server 2012 R2 Server.
Now SUSDB database was in Single User mode. I have tried ALTER DATABASE <<Database Name>> SET MULTI_USER WITH NO_WAIT and i'm getting blow error.
Msg 5069, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
ALTER DATABASE statement failed.
How i can change it Multi User?
Thanks
Uma

Since iPad is not a multi user device,

I'm interested in how other users deal with this.
My 1st iPad (I'll purchase more) is a coffee table device available to family and friends. Since I have many Apple products and confidential information that I don't want to share with friends/family/friends of family, I have taken the follow steps:
1. Not synced with Mobile Me, even though I subscribe, I don't want other people to sync to my master computers/databases. They can't make changes to my personal data.
2. I created a new email ID only used by the iPad. All mail sent by "other people" are sent from this ID.
3. Create Mail rules to forward general purpose family email to the iPad email ID.
4. Create subfolder/smartfolders of contacts, calendars, photos, etc and just download those subsets during sync.
5. Entrys into the iPad calendar upload into my master calendar but don't change anything I have set.
6. Contacts contain a small subset of family, friends. People that the typical user would email.
The iPhone, iPod have all been "personal devices". Information loaded wasn't as critical because that device was in one's personal possession. The iPad in many cases crosses that line into a multiuser device with single user support. All your personal data shouldn't be loaded for others to see/modify.
Your thoughts?

It's true, Capt. Fred, there's no security as yet on the iPad. Pages doesn't even let you save anything with a passcode. There are third party apps that will secure things (like +Documents to Go+ and Safe ) so you can secure files if you want to. You can also, of course, secure the entire iPad as you could the iPhone. It even has that feature that wipes the whole thing clean after 10 wrong password entries. But other than that, the whole thing is open and it does not support more than one user. There has been discussion of that elsewhere in this forum. In order for the OS to support a Windows or Mac like multi user account system, the thing would need to get a bit more complex than Apple wants just now, I think. But as more and more users migrate to the iPad for pretty much full time use, there will be more and more clamoring for more complexity and functionality. So it's a matter of time, I think. Already Apple is going to multitasking in the upcoming OS 4.0 upgrade for iPad and latest iPhones. My only question is, will my first run iPad support these inevitable future upgrades? We'll see, I guess. Sure hope so.
Message was edited by: StevePug2

UPK11 - multi-user environment - manage author permissions - help

We are configuring our UPK 11 multi-user environment.
As we have it set, the "everyone" group has modify access to all folders.
I would like to have a few admins have modify access to the system folder and everyone else be read only.
Here's my dilemma -
My admin profile is also a part of the everyone group - so if I set the permissions on the everyone group to read only, that effects the admin login as well.
The documentation says that if I set up an author with explicit folder permissions, that they are not included in the everyone group, but everytime I try, they are added (irrevocably) to the everyone group before I can even assign an explicit permission.
I tried to set the everyone group to read only and nearly hobbled my admin account.
Can someone who has managed authors in a UPK 11 multii-user environment send out some tips?
I'm not understanding the documentation well enough to make headway.
[email protected]

Hi Paul,
I recently performed an implementation of UPK 11 at a client and had to show one of their employees how to administer the security surrounding profiles and authors.
The group "Everyone" is default, and each person will belong to that group. It seems that when a person is assigned to another group/with author-specific permissions, it will override that which is set to the "Everyone" group.
What I normally suggest (and implement) is that you modularise your security (separate the authors into their respective departments), and then create those departments as groups, and then assign permissions as required. Lets use an example - it assumes you are logged in as an admin user:
I create 3 folders (where 4 and 5 are defaults):
1. HR
2. FIN
3. CS
4. Administrators
5. Everyone
Each author is defaulted to number 5, and all administrators should be included in group 4.
Now the goal is to prevent HR and FIN from modifying CS, and vice-versa for the other two groups.
You will see in your library that the root is defined as "/". Firstly, ensure that the Administrators group has Modify access to this folder (Administration --> Manage Groups --> Permissions). I think you need to click on edit, then click on the "Add" button (under permissions), and choose the root folder "/" - ensure it has modify - by default this value should already exist. This now ensures that the security is filtered down to all sub-ordinate folders that exist under the root folder - you do not need to manually assign "modify" permissions to each folder for the Administrator group, as you have already done so at root level.
You will also notice that there is a "Members/Users" tab (can't remember off the top of my head which), and this allows you to select the profiles/authors that have Administrator group priviledges - ensure the correct users are selected.
I normally leave the "Everyone" group as it is - do this for now, ensure everyone is included in it, and only modify after you have implemented and tested your security structure if needs be - normally the other group permissions override the "Everyone" group permissions.
Next step is to assign department specific permissions to the 3 folders we created. Navigate to Administration --> Manage Groups, and ensure that you begin by editing the first department group (HR) - create the group if not already done, then edit (little pencil logo). You would like all HR users to have full modify access to their folder only, but they must not be able to mess around with the other two departments or the "System", "Getting started with UPK" and "/" folders. Under permissions, click on the Add button, and ensure that the folder "HR" has modify priviledge. Add the remaining 4 folders (CS, FIN, System, Getting started with UPK), and assign either Read or Read/View permission - this will ensure all other folders cannot be modified by HR users. Add the relevant HR users to the group under the "Members/Users" tab.
Apply the same for FIN and CS respectively.
Now you could get to a point where you may need cross-departmental access for a few users (FIN may need to access some HR content). I recommed that you do this on the user level, and not the group level, as you will limit who can access other departments. Navigate to Administration --> Manage Authors. Click on the specific user that will require access to another department. Edit his profile and under the permissions tab, ensure that he has required access to the other department folder (or sub-folders only) by adding and assigning the priveledge. This should ovveride the group security set for that specific department - but only for this user!
Test by attempting to create content in an un-authorised folder (when logged in as a normal user). Test admin account by creating content in each folder. If it works - you will no longer need to modify "Everyone", as your permissions are defined under the other groups. I hope this all makes sense?
Thats it in a nutshell really.
I hope that this helps, and feel free to get back to me if you are still unsure?
Regards,
Greig

User Stuck at Applying User Setting after Login

I have windows server 2008r2 remote desktop environment. All my users stuck at Applying User Setting after login. I disabled remote desktop network interface for some time, then enabled and all fine. Checked logs in detail and nothing unusual found.
Could anyone assist to avoid recurrence of issue.
Rox_Star

Hi,
Thanks for your comment.
Sorry for late response. How is everything going on?
Does both the issue happens on same server? Is that same server with domain joined?
The above question relates to your other post.
Server stucks at Applying Computer Settings after every reboot
From the issue it seems that DNS server is not getting properly communicate for the server and due to that reason you are getting slow connection response from the DC to connect. If you are using DHCP in your network, you need to check the DHCP server setting
also for properly assigned IP address to the server. You can run “ipconfig /all” and check the DNS setting on your affected server.
In addition to above one, you can edit the registry setting for a test and check the result.
1. Open registry editor with regedit
2. Locate and then click the following registry subkey:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\HTTP
3. On the Edit menu, point to New, and then click
Multi-string Value.
4. Type DependOnService, and then press ENTER.
5. Right-click DependOnService, and then click Modify.
6. In the Value data box, type CRYPTSVC, and then click OK.
7. Exit Registry Editor.
8. Restart the computer.
Actually there is Hotfix (KB 2379016) for server 2008 but you can try this solution for server 2008 R2.
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki

Android Multi User support

Hi,
I have recently purchased a Galaxy Note Pro to use as a family device and have set it up with a number of users. I have successfully installed Skype on the primary account but unfortunately the notification of a call only occurs if logged into that account. I therefore though that if I installed Skype on each users profile with the same login details that this would be a workaround to the problem but unfortunately the skype installations on anything other than the primary account will not load.
I have seen an archived post from around 1 year ago suggesting that this was being looked at, does anyone have this sort of set up working?
Thanks in advance.
Jon.

Today is year 2004 Oct. I can run JDeveloper 10g in Linux 2.4.21-4.EL. It can be accessed by multiple users and projects are saved in individual's home.
Is there a proposal of how to setup user ownership for JDeveloper in multi user scenario, i.e. in university where 1 JDeveloper is shared by all students? For example Oracle product is owned by "oracle" in "oracle" group.
Because I have a test case where I "chown nobody:nobody" to JDevelper folder, I cannot download extension and I know it is read/write access problem.

BI multi user envirment

dear all ,
i have questions regarding Multi user enviroment
i have applied what is explained here :
http://st-curriculum.oracle.com/obe/fmw/bi/biee/r1013/mude/mude.htm#t2
but have questions :
1- As a user every time do I have to export a project from the shared RPD and create my own RPD (karen , kuret in the link) ?
2- The work always in shared RPD isn’t ? the master cannot get the update at all?
1- At the merge stage , In the Decision column, column Modified (A) from the drop-down list , means accepting user A change ?and Current mean taking current user change ??

Hello iguru,
The Server Administration Guide tells you how it should work:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10415_01/doc/bi.1013/b31770.pdf
kjgerhartl

File Discrepancies for Multi Users

Hi ...
We are running RH7 and RSC3.1 with 3 users - We identified
(only yesterday) that after User 1 had deleted one topic file from
Project Manager and added several others ... User 2 and 3 had
broken links for these topics.
We are able to update existing topics by one user, who check
in, then user 2 and 3 can get the latest version and instantly view
the changes - lovely!! Exactly what we would expect ...
But the same is not occurring when we remove or add entire
topics to both the Project Manager and the TOC ...
User 2 and 3 see the topics in the TOC with the dreaded red
cross through them ... and have to try and locate the file or
restore broken links etc ... to get their view of the project in
sync with User 1. This seems to defeat the whole purpose of being
able to have a multi user authoring environment????
A major concern of this problem appears to be the risk of
undoing each others work by potentially restoring files that
another user intended to remove ...
Is anyone else experiencing similar issues ... we are in a
big organisation and are very restricted in terms of our ability to
access the servers etc ... but I want to know if there is something
we should be checking or doing differently from an application
perspective? Any advice or ideas are greatly appreciated...
Many thanks ...
Frustrated!

Hi Fi@qldpol, and welcome to the board. With your situation,
there are two likely possibilities:
1. Was your project added to source control via RoboHelp, or
was it initially added using RoboSource Control? If it was added
from RoboSource Control, then that is the problem.
2. If #1 is not the problem, then you might be having
problems with some of the users' CPD files. First, have everyone
make backups of the local version of their project (the files
actually residing on their PCs). Then have User 2 and User 3 delete
their copy of the project, and replace it with a copy of User 1's
local files. Before they open the project, they should delete the
cpd and pss files. After they delete those files, they can open the
project as usual and let the cpd file rebuild. We have to do this
every so often with some of our projects to get everyone
synchronized.
Hope that helps.
G

I have windows, one computer but multi users. home sharing is on. how can i share music between users on one computer?

I have windows. One computer but multi users. Home sharing is on. 2 apple accounts-1 per user. 4 devices-2 iphones and 2 ipods per user. How can we share music on one computer between 2 users?

Hi Justinece, I've solved the problem in this way:
In my wife user profile I've set in itunes settings/advanced the path to my music library: /Users/"MY NAME"/Music/iTunes/Itunes media.
Than, from my wife profile using my administrator user and password I've set the "read/write" privileges on the above mentioned folder.
Finally I've added the folder in my wife's library taking care to not duplicate it ( leave blank the flag in itunes setting/advanced).
I really don't understand what's the use of home sharing...

Multi user catalog and how to make it - use a checked out system

Lots of people want or need a Multi user ability in lightroom here is one way to achieve multi-user catalogs by using a check-in check-out system.
The Catalog would open normally upon a second user opening LR would then ask to switch to multi-user mode.
Once in multi user mode lightroom would lock-out images, collections, or folders by a checked-out for editing system.
By checking-out images, collections, or folders: files would be unavailable to other users until edits are saved, and the images, collections, or folders are checked-in.
This check-in check-out system would need a global check-in feature in case someone forgot to check in an image, collection, or folders (global check-in could be admin level). Word documents, CAD files, etc, use a similar lock-out/read only system for the files. Since, we wouldn't want to bloat the files with programing to lock out the files, this would have to be added to the catalog and managed by the catalog.
My system
Vista Ultimate 32bit SP1
AMD 64X2 duel core 6000+ 3.2Ghz
6GB 666mhz Ram PAE force enabled
NVIDIA Gforce 7600 256MB video card (1.75GB total with system shared ram)
primary hard drive 500GB
Hard drive 2 400GB (system and photoshop paging files and lightroom catalog drive)
Hdrive 3 1TB (primary image storage)
user control turned off
system graphics set to performance
Duel display
LR 2.0
PS extended CS3

Your thread pool is a pool and probably keeps
the thread alive even though the thread has nothing
after a minute toi execute - you'll have to call its
shutdown() methodThanks Oxe...
I googled that (easy when you know what the answer is) and yes the ScheduledThreadPool retains threads for re-use, so you have to check that all threads are done and then shutdown() the scheduler... like this:     while (!future.isDone()) {
          try { Thread.sleep(10); } catch(InterruptedException e) {}
     scheduler.shutdown();
... here is the complete working class:
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledFuture;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.*;
import java.awt.Toolkit;
class BeeperControl {
     private final ScheduledExecutorService scheduler = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(1);
     public void beepForAMinute() {
          final Toolkit tk = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit();
          final Runnable beeper = new Runnable() {
               public void run() {
                    tk.beep();
                    System.out.println("beep");
          final ScheduledFuture<?> future = scheduler.scheduleAtFixedRate(beeper, 250, 250, MILLISECONDS);
          scheduler.schedule(
               new Runnable() {
                    public void run(){
                         future.cancel(true);
               }, 3, SECONDS
          while (!future.isDone()) {
               try { Thread.sleep(10); } catch(InterruptedException e) {}
          scheduler.shutdown();
     public static void main(String[] args)
          BeeperControl bc = new BeeperControl();
          bc.beepForAMinute();
}Thanx again. Keith.

Project.xpj is modified in multi-user setting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for