Pros and Cons of working in LAB color mode

I like to use LAB as my color mode. Partially becasue I have a spectrophotmeter and can sample things; partially becasue it is the space which I am most familiar with.
If you pick up almost any ID instruction book, it says "ID has three color modes: RGB, CMYK, and LAB. We aren't going to talk about LAB."  I assume that is at least partially due to legacy.  However, is there something I am overlooking? Is there a danger to work working in LAB I haven't thought through?
Mostly my work is output to web or print - both desktop and offset - without spot colors.

MarieMeyer wrote:
I seems to me that if I specify colors in LAB and then output to sRGB or Adobe RGB the color is going to be the same - whereas if I had typed in RGB values it will not. (Realizing this is NOT some magic cure for monitors not being calibrated!)
Obviously ID isn't an image editing/generator program, but for brochures and thing I do apply flat areas of colors. If I type in a LAB color that is out of the gamut of the CMYK profile of the working space, I get an OOG warning and can dial it back.  What I really like is the speed with which I can adjust the value of the color without changing the hue/chroma by adjusting just the L channel.  It is sort of like creating tint swatches, only in reverse!
dylw, I take your point about the number of printers who aren't meticulous. But don't I have the same problem if I'm relying on a swatchbook that provides CMYK values but was printed on a differe paper at a different company than the one that I'm going to use?
When I was a student I used to worry about exact color matching and presume that it could be achieved. Now that I've been out here working in the real world for a few years I understand that perfect color matching, even with good color management, is a myth. Most users don't have calibrated monitors, or even monitors capable of displaying the full gamut of what your eye can see or even what your camera or scanner might be able to capture, and process color gamuts are genereally smaller still. When you go to press you are at the mercy of the press operator, the vagaries of plate making equipment, paper inconsistencies, ink mixing, and even ink brand, not to mention the light sources in use at the press and in your office and where your product is finally viewed by your user, and how those particular inks react to differnt wavelengths.
Even a custom profile is at best a point sample, or an average of many point samples, from a particular run or runs, and is not going to match every sheet that comes off the press. A well-trained eye can probably spot variation in color from one end of a single press run to the other, and even more likely from one run to another. Your spectrophotometer is using a particular wavelength and angle of light to sample your color. Is that the same wavelength and angle that will be used in the client's office under the fluorescents? Has your specrophotmeter aged and drifted?
Color management is about getting good, or even excellent, matching of colors across various output conditions, but there are too many environmental variables to be able to achieve one single "perfect" set of output numbers. All you have to do is grab some output and stand in a doorway and compare what you see in daylight against what you see in room light to demonstrate. The human eye and brain, to varying degrees, recognize certain things as being "normal" colors and will accomodate to tell us, for example, that paper is white, even if it's a bit yellow or gray, until we have a whiter sample for comparison. Further, most of us are incapable of seeing the difference a 1 or 2% density shift on press would produce (and that's pretty close to the tolerance you could hope to achieve in the pressroom), let alone the fractions of percents that we often specify when converting colors.
Lab is a theoretical color space that has no "real world" equivalent, but is extremely useful for translating colors from one real world condition to another. Even if you choose to work "in" Lab, you are at best translating your sampled colors under their specific sampling conditions (which don't match your general lighting) to your monitor space (which may or may not be accurate) and then asking to translate to yet one more output space that probably will not match the real world conditions under which the finished work will be viewed.
What you are doing by specifying the color in Lab is trying to eliminate the source profile, but I doubt you'll get any better output.

Similar Messages

  • Pros and cons of creating a table with key

    Hi Folks
    I have some tables where there is no key defined in the source system. What is the best way to build such tables. In my case the source system is Teradata.
    I have 25-30 columns in dimension and what is the best way to load this data where there is no.
    What will be the Pros and Cons if I have a table without a key  or if I create a table with 25-30 keys.
    regards
    Poonam

    I recently purchased a Mac Mini and am using it with my TV.  Here's what I found:
    Using the HDMI connection on the Mac Mini, the image on the TV is very harsh.  It's very bright, high contrast and garish colors.  I did a lot of testing and am convinced this is due to the HDMI Display Profile in OS X Yosemite.  I could not find any way to change the display profile in the Mac Mini as long as HDMI was the connection.
    Using the miniDisplayport/Thunderbolt connection on the Mac Mini, with the Apple miniDisplayPort-DVI adapter and a DVI-HDMI cable the picture is perfect.  (Note, however, that this connection only carries video; if you want audio you will have to use a separate cable to connect the Mac Mini audio line out port to your TV's audio line in port.)
    That said, the larger the TV the less quality you will have displaying text.  I suggest using a 21" or smaller TV as a monitor if you will be doing text work.
    My setup is with a 40" Sony Bravia 1080p HDTV and the primary use is for video (concerts, movies, Skype, etc), not office apps.   As I said earlier, the picture is perfect - brightness, contrast, colors, resolution are as nice as I could ask for.

  • PROS and CONS of running FCP on NEW iMACS?

    Hi gang...
    It's a sad day -- I've been running fcp 5.1.4 using Tiger on my PowerMac G5 (dual core 2.3GHz, 2.5GB of memory) for years now -- few real problems besides operator error.
    All has been good.
    Along comes a client shooting XDCAM footage and suddenly I'm feeling VERY behind the times. I'm unable to edit with this codec since it's not compatible with fcp 5.0. And since my G5 is pre-Intel processor, I'm unable to upgrade to fcp 6 or higher (is this accurate?)
    So what are the pros and cons of purchasing one of the new iMacs to run fcp 7? Although my G5 was installed with a DeckLink card, I never did any external monitoring using an NTSC monitor. Most of the stuff I'm doing is long form programming, straight cuts/dissolves, minimal graphics. I'm creating alot of content for the web, delivering some (non-broadcast) masters on dvd.
    Do the iMacs have external monitoring capabilities? (I'm under the impression they don't)
    Am I really at the point where I need to purchase new hardware? (I've been so happy with my G5.)
    What will be my minimum investment, and is the Macmini ($599) a viable option?
    And finally, does Joni love Chachi?
    Thanks

    FCS3 (FCP7) is only supported on intel processors. FCS2 (FCP6) runs fine on G5s.
    iMacs do not have external monitoring capabilities beyond using firewire out for DV. I don't know how the mini-dvi port works with something like the original Matrox MXO. It may work fine.
    Still, there is no way to hook up esata drives, replace the video card with something that supports Motion or Color or add any one of dozens of nifty bells and whistles.
    The mac mini is a poor choice. Lousy graphics support and NO expansion capabilities.
    Get a MacPro.
    x

  • What are the Pros and Cons of Using Batch Numbers over Serialization

    Dear SAP Gurus:
    Will someone please give me the benefits of using Batch Management over serial numbers in this case scenerio, or vice versa:
    Client wants to trace all the components of an assembly in a BOM.  Even the Raw material.  The client sends the material out today and has the vendor assign serial numbers to the individual pieces, the client gives the range of serial numbers to use.  We are looking at using batch numbers to accomplish this and issue one material and batch number to a production order.  Then use MB56 batch where used functionality to view history.  I am wanting to understand the benefits of this.  Please advise and points will be awarded as always. 
    Also, in this scenerio, can you issue multiple material/batch numbers to one vendor op that has its own production order?

    Yes it is a subcontract. 
    Example:  This is the solution but need the pros and cons of doing this scenerio
    Sheet of metal sent to vendor to make lets say 1800 peices of material number nas5703-01.  All 1800 pieces come back and issued to a production work order using one bacth number for one material item so that batch number can be traced in history in MB56 and a fit up report.

  • What are the pros and cons using Active Data Guard vs Data Guard?

    My understanding is that Active Data Guard is an additional database option for Oracle 11gR2 Enterprise Edition. I need to know the pros and cons using Active Data Guard vs Data Guard in order to decide whether to get pay extra for the Active Data Guard.
    Thanks for any help.

    Hemant K Chitale wrote:
    Before jumping in to Active Data Guard, one needs to evaluate :
    a. Is there really a need to run queries on the Standby ? The Standby could / should be at a remote site so queries are "across the network". Depending on the nature of the queries and the volume of output, the "performance" of the queries may not seem to be the same.
    b. If the database is not in Maximum Protection mode, the data "seen" at the standby may not be in "real-time" synch
    c. Not all applications are truely read-only when querying. Some applications use "jobs" that write to tables when querying. Such would not work with Active DataGuard. (example : EBusiness Suite). There are very complicated ways of handling this -- and one needs to consider if the complications can be introduced and supported.
    Over the network accessing standby read only is really not an good idea, I think no one will compare performance with primary and standby,
    But some of them they want to validate data which are very critical, as it is matching with primary or not, Its an added advantage with ACTIVE DATAGUARD
    Prior to that until unless stop MRP, open database and then we need to validate, So there is an interruption of recovery, I can say its also an advantage where there is no interruption of recovery.

  • What are the pros and cons re using an intel iMac vs MacPro with LP8?

    I'm considering getting a new intel Mac in the near future (presuming a new MacPro will be released in the near future - maybe at the same time as Leopard). I compose largely for film and television and I am composing largely using a combination of loops, software instruments and some recorded live performance. I usually sync to a low res quicktime movie.
    I do like the idea of a simple and uncluttered work environment with an iMac, added to which there's also a degree of portability with the iMac however the MacPro is obviously more powerful. I'm not sure how much the difference in power between the two computers would affect me.
    Would I be compromising myself much if I went for the iMac over the MacPro? What are the pros and cons of the iMac vs the MacPro in relation to Logic Pro 8?

    In the world large-scale music composition using samples, loops, etc (especially for film) your two biggest needs are RAM and HD speed/access. The imac looses big time in this department (as a single computer at least) as it can only be upgraded to 4gb ram, and only holds one internal HD, and also lacks any PCI expansion for DSP cards, audio interfaces, etc.
    In generalyou want to separate your data vs applications as much as possible, to ensure both can be accessed quickly and easily by the computer. So its best to have your system software / applications on one internal HD, and your logic data (samples, audio recordings, loops) on another drive(s). You can do this with an iMac via USB, FW800, & FW400, but depending on how big your projects get, how many USB and FW drives / interfaces you use, and how much data you need to stream, you could overload the buss on the imac (not sure if it has multiple busses or not). Plus speed wise, internal SATA are much faster than external drives, and the mac pro with its 4 internal slots seems like a great choice for speed and flexibility.
    However, if you dont find yourself doing large scale projects, then you might be better off going with an imac. We just purchased one for my father and it runs great! It blows the socks off of my Dual 2.5 G5 tower in terms of CPU speed! If you run into problems running things from the imac, you could always add a mac-mini down the road to stream sample libs, as a Logic node, etc, which seems to be a much more cost effective solution.
    I hope this was helpful, but I probably just made the decision harder . In fact, if I were to start over today, I dont know if I'd go with a MacPro, or an iMac / mac mini combination. they both seem to have their advantages / disadvantages.
    Best of luck!

  • Pros and Cons of putting jspx pages under WEB-INF

    Greetings All,
    I have been using JHeadstart release 10.1.3 Prod for a while now and was generating pages in various subdirectories under WEB-INF/pages/ and things are working fine.
    However, recently I came across a post in jDeveloper forum Re: Access JSF Pages within WEB-INF directory where Frank Nimphius has mentioned that there is no sense in putting JSP files that are used with JSF into WEB-INF.
    I know that in struts world it makes sense to put the jsp files under WEB-INF to prevent the users from directly accessing them and force them to access them only via struts actions/navigation rules; but in JSF world we anyway expose the jspx names to the user and in-fact if we keep the pages under WEB-INF the url to access the pages also contains 'faces/WEB-INF/...'
    Thus, I would like to get opinion from various experienced professionals participating in this forum and more so from JHeadStart team members on Pros and Cons of putting jspx pages under WEB-INF
    regards - rutwik

    Rutwik,
    From your reply it seems that, for now, there should not be any impact on us as long as we don't upgrade to JDeveloper 10.1.3.1, as anyway the current JHS version is not certified against it.
    Correct.
    However, to be compatible with future releases of JHS and JDeveloper, will it be good to change the location of pages in our JHeadStart definitions to move them a directories above the WEB-INF etc and re-run the JHeadStart generators?
    Yes.
    Or, will the patch take care of modifying the current JHeadStart definations?
    No, Service Update 1 has a different default value for the pages dir , it is now /pages/ instead of /WEB-INF/page/, that's all.
    Also, with this patch, will we be able to upgrade to jDeveloper 10.1.3.1, which we would like to do once we have a production release?
    Yes, Service Update 1 is compatible with JDev 10.1.3.1
    Steven Davelaar,
    JHeadstart Team.

  • Using CLOB data type - Pros and Cons

    Dear Gurus,
    We are designing a database that will be receiving comments from external data source. These comments are stored as CLOB in the external database. We found that only 1% of incoming data will be larger than 4000 characters and are now evaluating the Pros and Cons of storing only 4000 characters of incoming comments in VARCHAR2 data type or using CLOB data type.
    Some of the concerns brought up during discussion were:
    - having to store CLOBs in separate tablespace;
    - applications, such Toad require changing defaults settings to display CLOBs in the grid. Default value is not to display them;
    - applications that build web page with CLOBs will be struggling to fit 18 thousand chararcters of which 17 thousand are blank lines;
    - cashing CLOBs in memory will consume big chunk of data buffers which will affect performance;
    - to manipulate CLOBs you need PL/SQL anonymous block or procedure;
    - bind variables cannot be assigned CLOB value;
    - dynamic SQL cannot use CLOBs;
    - temp tables don't work very well with CLOBs;
    - fuzzy logic search on CLOBs is ineffective;
    - not all ODBC drivers support Oracle CLOBs
    - UNION, MINUS, INTERSECT don't work with CLOBs
    I have not delt with CLOB data type in the past, so I am hoping to hear from you of any possible issues/hastles we may encounter?

    848428 wrote:
    Dear Gurus,
    We are designing a database that will be receiving comments from external data source. These comments are stored as CLOB in the external database. We found that only 1% of incoming data will be larger than 4000 characters and are now evaluating the Pros and Cons of storing only 4000 characters of incoming comments in VARCHAR2 data type or using CLOB data type.
    Some of the concerns brought up during discussion were:
    - having to store CLOBs in separate tablespace;They can be stored inline too. Depends on requirements.
    - applications, such Toad require changing defaults settings to display CLOBs in the grid. Default value is not to display them;Toad is a developer tool so that shouldn't matter. What should matter is how you display the data to end users etc. but that will depend on the interface. Some can handle CLOBs and others not. Again, it depends on the requirements.
    - applications that build web page with CLOBs will be struggling to fit 18 thousand chararcters of which 17 thousand are blank lines;Why would they struggle? 18,000 characters is only around 18k in file size, that's not that big to a web page.
    - cashing CLOBs in memory will consume big chunk of data buffers which will affect performance;Who's caching them in memory? What are you planning on doing with these CLOBs? There's no real reason they should impact performance any more than anything else, but it depends on your requirements as to how you plan to use them.
    - to manipulate CLOBs you need PL/SQL anonymous block or procedure;You can manipulate CLOBs in SQL too, using the DBMS_LOB package.
    - bind variables cannot be assigned CLOB value;Are you sure?
    - dynamic SQL cannot use CLOBs;Yes it can. 11g supports CLOBs for EXECUTE IMMEDIATE statements and pre 11g you can use the DBMS_SQL package with CLOB's split into a VARCHAR2S structure.
    - temp tables don't work very well with CLOBs;What do you mean "don't work well"?
    - fuzzy logic search on CLOBs is ineffective;Seems like you're pulling information from various sources without context. Again, it depends on your requirements as to how you are going to use the CLOB's
    - not all ODBC drivers support Oracle CLOBs not all, but there are some. Again, it depends what you want to achieve.
    - UNION, MINUS, INTERSECT don't work with CLOBsTrue.
    I have not delt with CLOB data type in the past, so I am hoping to hear from you of any possible issues/hastles we may encounter?You may have more hassle if you "need" to accept more than 4000 characters and you are splitting it into seperate columns or rows, when a CLOB would do it easily.
    It seems as though you are trying to find all the negative aspects of CLOBs and ignoring all the positive aspects, and also ignoring the negative aspects of not using CLOB's.
    Without context you're assumptions are just that, assumptions, so nobody can tell you if it will be right or wrong to use them. CLOB's do have their uses, just as XMLTYPE's have their uses etc. If you're using them for the right reasons then great, but if you're ignoring them for the wrong reasons then you'll suffer.

  • Pros and cons of changing DNS servers?

    Hello guys, First of all I am a non technical person related to DNS servers. So I want to know what are the pros and cons if you change your DNS servers?
    I wanted to access Netflix but its not yet available in my country so I came across http://unotelly.com/ . They provide a method to access but by changing DNS. Can someone guide should I do it? What are the pros and cons? Thank you

    The DNS is what translates in and outgoing URLs to your local domain server. Changing it may have no adverse effect. It could result in faster or slower translations, but you may not even notice either. However, if it does not work properly, then you will not get web sites in your browser until you revert back to a DNS that you know works or delete all added DNS entries which returns to the system default.

  • SOAP vs RFC - performance and pros and cons

    Hi,
    I have been playing around with the SAP .NET Connector 2.0 between an ASP.NET 1.1 application and SAP passing in either SOAP or RFC connection strings to the proxy classes as a proof of concept for some integration work required for our existing customer website and teh SAP system replacing our legacy applications.
    Other than issues relating to the ports that need to be opened in Firewalls between application environments can anyone provide me with any information or point me in the direction of any documentation regarding the performance differences between and pros and cons of using these two protocols?
    The impression I get is that RFC performs better than SOAP due to the XML conversion overhead inherent in using SOAP calls.
    I know that the ESOA direction of SAP means that SOAP is the desired protocal in the long run but is there any reason why one should be used in preference to the other in the scenario menttioned above?
    Sorry if there is an obvious answer and thank you in advance for any help.
    Andy

    We did a lot of load tests to find answers on how the protocol can have impact on the performance. With our test systems RFC was about 3 times faster than SOAP and the network traffic was doubled with SOAP (approx.). And it seems to me that RFC offers more parallel processes (for multithreading application), but I'm not hundred percent sure on that point.
    We used rel. 640 with Web AS, Client was .NET Connector and ERPConnect with .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0.
    Krishtan

  • Pros and  cons  of  select  for  update  clause

    hi,
    Can anybody explain what are the
    pros and cons of select for update clause
    11.2.0.1

    As commented, there are no pros versus cons in this case.
    What is important is to understand conceptually what this do and why it would be use.
    Conceptually, a select for update reads and locks row(s). It is known as pessimistic locking.
    Why would you want to do that? Well, you have a fat client (Delphi for example) and multiple users. When userA updates an invoice, you want that invoice row(s) locked and prevent others from making updates at the same time. Without locking, multiple users updating the same invoice will result in existing updated data being overwritten by old data that also has been updated. A situation called lost updates.
    For web based clients that are stateless, pessimistic locking does not work - as the clients do not have state and pessimistic locking requires state. Which means an alternative method to select for update needs to be used to prevent lost updates. This method is called optimistic locking.
    So it is not about pros versus cons. It is about understanding how the feature/technique/approach works and when to use it.. and when it is not suited to use it. All problems are not nails. All solutions are not the large hammer for driving in nails.

  • SAPSPRINT vs Local Printers (Pro and Cons)

    Hi guys.
    Anyone can help me out citing pro and cons by installing a SAPSPRINT over windows vs having printers installed directy over the Iseries Server.
    Its planned to install productive printers which are very critical, so we would like to devise the best approach.
    By installing the SAPSPRINT would avoid the bottlenecks if the printers are installed locally?
    Thanks!

    Hi Markus, nice to see you.
    I agree with the fact that a central print server you can have a better administration of your printers.
    My concern is that based on Note 19706 - Tuning the Spooler, productive printers must never be defined with access type U or S, and all printers created on that print server are type U, which is the recommended access method for remote printers.
    Group 1 (Productive printer):
    All printers with the shortest possible response time.
    For example: Goods receipt/issue sheets, delivery notes, patient entry sheets,...
    Printers with a fast response (Group 1):
    Devices with short response times must NEVER be defined with access type 'U' or 'S'. When a problem occurs (e.g. network problems, PC is switched off etc.), a single printer linked to a work process by access type 'U' disturbs all the connected printers. All printers in this group MUST be linked with access type 'L' or 'C' (depending on the operating system). If they are not linked to the server, they must be defined in the host spooler as "remote printers" and forwarded via the the host spooler.
    So why this note recommends to put printers locally in order avoid network issues and so on, but SAP also recommends a SAPSPRINT as printing solution?
    Does SAPSPRINT overrule any recommendation to local printers and is a definite solution way better than local printing?
    Thanks Markus again

  • Neptune for UI development Pros and Cons

    Hi ,
    we are evaluating neptune for UI development for what are the pros and cons of using neptune.
    i see only that webdynpro abap developer can be easily moved to neptune , some javascript knowledge is still required.
    some question
    1) can neptune make calls to odata services ? do that requires code in javascript or ABAP
    2) any accelerators provided by neptune  like for workflow scenarios , list and details .
    3) can sap standard fiori apps extensibility  or modification is possible through neptune
    4) security if its accessing business functionality directly
    regards
    Yashpal

    Hi Yashpal,
    I will give you my view, but as Robbe says I work for the company and other SAP developers like DJ Adams has other development tool preferences than me ( I call his Sublime Text development spaghetti coding and he sees Neptune as a crutch that restricts a developer's freedom but this is just a friendly point-of-view discussion and I have promised him a beer in Walldorf next time our paths cross there)
    So the important message is that SAP has opened up their platform for different development tools and it is now a choice for the individual developer or SAP customer. This is a fantastic move by SAP and I think a bit overlooked by the community, Look at the new Xamarin partnership as an example (and yes they are a competitor, but I did mention them )
    Now the pros of Neptune are in my opinion:
    ABAP developer friendly development (removed 90% of JavaScripting needed)
    Connected to the SAP transport System (Software Logistics as is)
    Drag Drop designer that gives structured code (easy for a new developer to take over code, compared to the spaghetti provided by DJ <-  I'll need to buy a few extra beers for that remark)
    Native json communication provided by the Neptune Server (you can argue all you want about Odata, our solution is more flexible gives incredible performance and superb and easy to use offline capabilities)
    Integration with Adobe build, use an SAP program to generate hybrid apps  (The average ABAP developer does not install cordova and build hybrid apps - with Neptune he/she does)
    Integration with SMP. Automatic connection with the REST API's of SMP both on-premise and in the Cloud
    Reduced time to market. One of the largest SAP implementation partners in the Nordics stated that Neptune reduced development time by 80%
    Free templates (Advanced templates such as fully functional PM, HCM, SD templates are available Experience | Neptune Software  <- sorry for the marketing but you did ask)
    UI5, all of the other third-party tools (Not SAP tools like App Builder, Eclipse etc) uses non UI5 frameworks. I personally believe that SAPUI5 (UI5) is the future of SAP UX and thus it only makes sense to keep a common and future-proof framework.
    Network crunching. We optimize all networking. Which makes sense for mobility.
    no extra infrastructure needed - it is a certified add-on and takes 15 mins to install.
    Works with most versions of SAP. We even have alot of customers using 4.7 (we need the ICF so nothing lower). This is something the community often forgets. Yes it is cool to play with the latest Netweaver release, but do our customers have that installed?
    Cons (woot!)
    Cost, even if Neptune is very affordable it still requires license for productive usage (free for developers though - and hey we need to live as well ) So custom coding  is cheaper in respect to license (but not in TCO in my opinion)
    Generated code, even if we have added as much freedom to code custom JavaScript as possible there will always be restrictions in generated code compared to notepad. (But I haven't met an issue that couldn't be solved by custom coding in the Neptune Application Designer yet)
    Other backend systems. Neptune is based on ABAP and as such it obviosly works best with an ABAP backend.
    .... (Add stuff from other non Neptune ppl )
    Regarding your questions:
    1. Yes you can use Odata, best way is to consume it on the ABAP level, but you can of course consume it through JavaScript as well (Not recomended by me)
    2. Yes see above (free templates and also premium templates by our partners)
    3. No you can't modify a fiori app with Neptune, but the two solutions work perfectly together (You can add Neptune apps in the Fiori launchpad) One of our partners have created an RDS solution based on both Fiori and Neptune.
    4. Neptune is an add-on to Netweaver and as such has no extra security in itself beyond that (And we seek not to do that). But we support any security you wish to add on top. I strongly advice having a look at the SAP Secure offering (App protection and MDM)  as well as SMP (also the new Cloud edition which gives easy affordable protection for your backend)
    So that was my very biased answer
    Njål

  • Too worried to upgrade software. The pros and cons

    From a NOkia lover to others, 
    I am all for making improvements and fully understand that we can't always get it right first time every time but atm I am too concerned with the fact that updating my software will create problems that are non-existent in my eyes.
    My girlfriend updated her (my old) N70 software last week and now her phone is in the repair shop. This could just be a coincidence but....
    I had an N95 (on orange) and was stung when the "unlucky for some" version 13 was installed on the handset. See the epic thread here "N95 firmware upgrade affects battery life" (couldn't post link) 
    I carried out the full back up to my card as instructed but the games I purchased would no longer work so had to re-buy them. The battery life was killed in eight hours due to the wlan making a connection attempt as long as the battery would allow it to happen. The point is... all of this was not happening before the update. 
    It was that bad that in the end I was forced to upgrade / get a new contract before I was entitled to one from Orange and had to fork out for two contracts to get the handset spec I needed.
    I now have an N95 8GB and have no qualms with it what so ever. It has version 20 atm and pc suite informs me there is an update every time I boot the program up. So far.. I have declined to update.
    So what are the pros and cons and is it more of a risk to chance losing the licenses I have paid for and update if nothing is wrong?
    Best Regards
    SgtTrojan 
    The swordsman that goes to war thinking of saving himself had better not go to war at all.

    I myself am also worried. A friend of mine told me if there is no porblem with your current version of firmware for your phone then why update? It is not a assurance that after updating there would be no problems/bugs with the new version.My friend has a point. Why would we update if there is no problem with your current firmware version? Some would say it would be faster, there would be more improvements to the music ( which I know would be depending with your hardware and not the software).
    I am thinking of updating my firmware with a Nokia Service Center here in my country (Philippines). It is for free at the moment because my phone ins under 1 year Warranty. But I am thinking twice after what my friend told me.
    I hope my opinion helps you all out here.

  • Mouse 4 and marks - pros and cons with Mavericks

    Hello,
    I'm pretty new to mac but have had computers for many many years. However I've bought the latest iMac maxed out.
    Pros and cons:
    Pros: It's an Apple product. It great really and I love it. The only wonder I have is why they made the computer thinner and didn't install a true desktop graphic card in there. I guess it's because they don't want people to buy that computer instead of Mac Pro.
    Cons:
    1. I've been searching for a way for go back in a browser faster without trackpad/magicmouse. There is only thirdparty programs that I have to pay for that support Mouse 4, for example. Still don't understand why Apple have chosen not to support this. Atleast allow me to just drag the window like we do on the iPhone. Right now I have to either click the back button or right click and chose "Back".
    2. When I'm in my Videos folder or any type of folder really. Let's say I have a folder with 10 movies in it. I open one, watch it and then close the player. I then can't see which video I just watched. The only way to see this is either to remember the videoname or open all videos again until I find it. In Windows, the video/file will be marked so I know which file I just watched.
    3. iCloud service are very nice, but still a little hard to understand how it works. If I transfer all my pictures from my iPhone to my iMac using iCloud and then delete them all from my phone. Will they disappear on my Mac too? Since the systems are synced?

    Send Apple feedback. They won't answer, but at least will know there is a problem. If enough people send feedback, it may get the problem solved sooner.
    Feedback

Maybe you are looking for

  • Addition of new column in Transaction VL10G

    Hello Experts. My requirement is that USER want to add new column in Transaction  VL10G There two plant in which Ware house management is activated. while creating delivery from Transaction VL10G from these two plants, Storage type column should be a

  • Keep getting a dialog box that say that a script on this page is either missing or non-responsive, and this slows everything down.

    This only happens when online using Firefox. And seems to happen more often when transferring a document or picture to my Document file. By the way, I am using Windows XP. I have tried a fix called Script Stop, but the problem persists. Aside from go

  • Aliasing on XDCAM HD footage

    After update, no more flickering but aliasing issues. Sotware also very slow to load and run project. Scrubing impossible. Any ideas ? TX !!!!

  • Oracle Discoverer 11g

    Hello All, I am attempting to create a drill link in Oracle Discoverer 11g. When I click 'tools'  and Look for 'drill' it's grayed out. Could someone please assist me in enabling this feature to allow me to create database links.

  • Sql for update

    Hello All, I am stuck in simple sql here hop you guys can help me. Here is my scenerio I have Table A,B,C Table A id, package Table B id, packageTable c id packageI need to update table A something like update table A set package = (select case when