Purchase order - consumable purchasing

Hi
we are creating purchase order for cosumable items such as papers, pens etc, it is asking us to enter plant, but actually we are not purchasing these items for any plant, is there any way we can avoid entering the plant in consumable purchase orders, can anyone help me with this,
thanks,
monica

Hi Monica,
When you create a PO for purchasing any material (for instance you are procuring consumables such as paper or pen). Without plant, we can't do PO. The main purpose is, from where the PO is issued to certain vendor Or and at Which place (i mean Plant) the goods (i.e., goods ordered in PO) to be delivered by the Vendor physically.
For ordering consumables /Purchasing of Consumables,
STEPS:
(As you said, the material is not for the Plant, but may be it for the Accounts or Administration department purpose, i am right...)
then,
Use NLAG (Non stock material) Material type to create Paper /Pen as a Material
   hence, the material is not updated by Quantity or by Value.
Create a PO for Paper 
Note: Plant is mandatory and without plant you can not create PO, cos it shows where you will receive the goods or where vendor should send the consumable goods physically, but cost incurred on that item purchase will be posted to Cost Center, which is a relevent one)
take Account Assignment Category : K    (Item Overview of PO doc.)
In Account Assignment Tab  :  (Item Details of PO doc.)
Enter G/L Account No.  :  .............?             you can get this from SAP FI
Enter Cost Center         :  .............?             you can get this from SAP CO
Then SAVE it.
I think this will help you in solving your query...
Have a good day,
Regards,
Srinivas.K
Message was edited by:
        sapsrin
Message was edited by:
        sapsrin

Similar Messages

  • PP MRP order consume fcst question

    here is an example:CTO1 and CTO2 has the same structure(history reason)and we plan on both CTO
             CTO1    CTO2
    fcst    100       100
    after get orders:
             CTO1    CTO2
    fcst    100       100
    order   150       10
    since CTO1 order will only conusme CTO1's fcst..how can CTO1 orders consume CTO1 fcst first and continue to consume CTO2's fcst once CTO1 fcst are less than CTO1 oder(CTO1 fcst < CTO1 order)
    Not sure if we can make it in SAP...Pls feel free to bring your comments...thanks very much..

    CTO1 and CTO2 are a configurable materials (super BOM)..and the customer require model(MTM) orders will consume the fcst on these configurable materials(63 strategy Planning w.plng material w/o mke-to-ord)..
    for example,CTO1 have 10 building block(like,HD,SP..)BB1,BB2,..BB10 while cusotmer order may only require BB1,BB2..and this customer order will conusme the fcst on this CTO1's BB1,BB2 fcst...
             fcst
    BB1   100
    BB2   100
    BB10  100
    customer order arrive:require BB1 10,BB2 10
               fcst     order reserve
    BB1     90         10
    BB2     90          10
    BB10  100
    We will only plan on CTO(super BOM)..and orders have detailed requirements..
    Not sure if I make u understand...
    Now we plan on CTO1 and CTO2(CTO1 has the same BOM structure as CTO2)
    if a customer order comes,we hope the order will consume the fcst on CTO1 first,then consume CTO2...
    63 strategy =Planning the planning material

  • Should PPDS orders consume capacity in the SNP Capacity view in 9ASNP94?

    Dear Gurus
    Should PPDS orders consume capacity in the Capacity View in 9ASNP94?
    We currently only use PPDS, but are looking to implement SNP for mid-range planning and S&OP.  I would like to demonstrate the simplicity of the capacity view in SNP, but the planned orders in PPDS do not consume the capacity of the Resource in the standard planning book/view SNP94(2).  We are using Single mixed production resources which I thought were suitable for both PPDS and SNP planning.  This is a particular concern because I would expect that the SNP and PPDS horizons will have to cross over and so PPDS and SNP will have to take into account the capacity consumed by orders in the other module.
    Any help will be appreciated!
    Elamobel

    If you are using PDS you probably need this BADI:
    Note 657185 - RTO: Sample code for calculating bucket consumptions 4.0
    As standard only the continuous consumption is maintained in the PDS by the CIF, the bucket consumption (which is the SNP view of capacity) is missing.
    Check the related notes too (especially 1462965)
    If you are using PPMs you can just maintain the missing data directly

  • Forecasting Based planning, consider incoming Sales orders, Consume PIR's

    Hello Guys:
    I am in real Problem about this one: I am implementing forecast-based MRP for our client which is a trading company: buys, keeps in storage and sells goods (R/3 ECC 6). We are using material forecast on a monthly period, and run MRP on a weekly period since POs are to be created weekly (therefore we also use the "Splitting indicator" to split monthly forecast values to weekly requirements)
    The way MRP calculates future stocks in this situation (MRP type VV) is like this:
    Current stock
    + Open POs to arrive
    - Forecast Requirement
    = Future stock
    The problem with that one is that if there is an SD order or delivery in the future, SAP does not count in that one as well. It is a real problem, just imagine that in two weeks we have a forecast of 10 pieces of a material. SAP will propose Preqs based on this 10 piece consumption, even if we have an SD sales order for that week on 30 pieces. (by the way the SD order is in the list of MD05 but SAP does not count in that one for future stock reductions).
    If I modify the MRP type in customizing OMDQ, I can make SAP to count in real consumptions (sales orders) in the future stocks: I set "MRP procedure" to PD (MRP) or "R1" (Time-phased materials planning). In this case MRP calculates like this:
    Current stock
    + Open POs to arrive
    - Forecast Requirement
    - Real future requirements (sales orders)
    = Future stock
    So in this case SAP will recommend double quantities to purchase: once for the forecast reqs and on the other hand for the real sales orders.
    It is a trap, SAP should reduce the forecast requirements with the real requirements. The really bad news is that there is a switch for this in OMDQ for the MRP types called "Reduce forecast" but it is not working: I have tried all the combinations of codes in the frame "Use forecast for MRP" but it can only decrease req for the current month and only on a timely basis code "2" for MRP procedure "PD" or "R1".
    Thanks for Help.
    Sweth123

    Hi Mario:
    I am using MRP type PD , Running the forecast using MP30 which generate the forecast requirement.
    I go to MD61 , I Slected Material Forecast option and Copied the forecast requirements as planned independent requirement,
    AFter that when i run MD02 and go to MD04 Screen.
    System Displays MRP Element: UnPlrq----Forecast quantity  --1000
                                MRP Element VSF for Planned Independent requirement -1000.
    Based upon historical consumption data , if there ia requirement of 1000pc , system is proposing 2000 pcs to buy.
    Is there any config setting i need to change so that system won't double the requirement quanitities?
    Please clarify
    Sweth.

  • Sales order consuming current month forecast

    Hi All,
    We are using weekly planning bucket in DP and weekly bucket in SNP. We are trying to release forecast in weekly bucket.
    When forecast is getting released from DP to SNP it gets validity of one week. We would like to change forecast validity to one month.so any sales order within one month can consume the forecast.
    Please let me know if its possible that slaes order should consume current month forecast only while releasing from DP to SNP?
    any user exit we need to enhance for changing forecast validity to one month from one week?
    Hrishikesh

    Didn't understand your question.
    You changed the schedule line date and it re-appeared in DP?

  • Sales order consuming demand

    Hi,
    We got an issue, sales order schdule line date is 10-12-2010 and its status is fully delivered now the business user wants to change the schedule line date to10-12-2009 as the user as entered wrong due to this it is showing in DP planning book as order received and invoice quantity.
    Material     Cust. ADAU Level     Cust. ADAU Level     ETA Month     AD Live     Order Quantity     Delivery Quantity     AD Live Remain
    104478     1001752     BSI  LTD.                                                 201012           19.85     19.85     -19.85
    it is consuming -19-85 as shown above.
    Please let me know the solution ASAP

    Didn't understand your question.
    You changed the schedule line date and it re-appeared in DP?

  • How to customize a Purchase Order without availability control in FM module

    Dear FM Masters,
    i have the following request :
    On our system All the Purchase order consume budget, today we are asked to customize a new type of purchase order which does not consume budget. How to do it ? i ve tried to find the link beetween value type (eg : 51 Purchase Order and MM document type) but i have not find it...
    As information it is not possible to create another fund because of policy purpose...
    your help will be welcome
    regards

    Hi Suma,
    Check this link
    Creating Purchase Order IDOC through XI
    /people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/03/creating-purchase-order-idoc-through-xi
    Sachin

  • Purchase order :Stock transport orders: IDOC

    Hi
    I want send an IDOC to a external non-SAP system as soon as the delivery and picking is done. The non-SAP system would have to trigger a goods issue with reference to a picking number as soon as the goods are issued on the non-SAP system.
    Is there a message type for picking and goods issue?

    Example:
    Plant 'Y' has one Storage Location 'C'.
    Plant 'Y' is the MRP Area (SAP ECC) / Planning Location (SAP SCM APO)
    Plant 'X' has two Storage Locations 'A' & 'B'.
    Plant 'X' is the MRP Area (SAP ECC) / Planning Location (SAP SCM APO)
    Initially in Week 01 an APO Deployment generated Purchase Requisition (Distribution Receipt (Confirmed)) exists to order 100 EA from Plant 'Y' into Plant 'X'.
    Afterwards for the same Week 01 also a Stock Transport Order is manually being raised & executed in SAP ECC in order to transport 7 EA from Plant 'X' / Storage Location 'B' into Plant 'X' / Storage Location 'A'.
    This Stock Transport Order consumes 7 EA of the APO Deployment Purchase Requsitions reducing it to 93 EA (= 100 EA - 7 EA).
    This Stock Transport Order of 7 EA within Plant 'X' shouldn't it have had a net zero effect on the requirements situation of Plant 'X', and thus should not have caused any change rg what Plant 'X' requires from Plant 'Y'?
    Edited by: SNC User ID on Feb 16, 2012 10:42 AM

  • How to enable VSF cosumed with Individual purchase order(TAB)

    Hi, SAP guru.
    I want VSF consumed with individual purchase order (TAB).
    Could you give me the instrunction please?

    I explain here in detail.
    (In material master, srgategy group is '40'.)
    When you create a sales order with item category 'TAN', this sales order consume 'VSF'.
    and you change this item category to 'TAB', the consumption or allocation disappear.
    I want this TAB to be kept consumed with VSF.
    Could you give me the possibility and the instruction.
    For example;
    1. Intial
                                        Requirement
          Nov-1st    VSF      100
    2. When you create SO with TAN (10 pcs), SO consumes 10 of VSF.
                                        Requirement
          Nov-1st    VSF      90
          Nov-1st    SO        10
    3. And you change item caetgory to 'TAB',  VSF is back to 100.
                                        Requirement
          Nov-1st    VSF      100
    --- Cstock    SO (TAB)
          Nov-1st    PReq       10          
    What I did
          Requirement class '050' and 'KEB'    (OVZG)
                           VPZUO  is '1'  (I think sap standard)
        => It suppose that SO cousumes VSF, as VPZUO is same as ZUVKZ of PIR.
          Schedule line category 'CB'      (OVZ8)
                            Check 'Availability check for sales' (ATPPR) and  'Transfer of requirements' (BEDSD)
         =>  SO is displayed in MD04, but not consume VSF.
    3'. And you change item caetgory to 'TAB',  VSF is back to 100. SO doesn't consume it.
                                        Requirement
          Nov-1st    VSF      100
    --- Cstock    SO (TAB)
          Nov-1st   SO           10
          Nov-1st    PReq       10

  • Open Sales order is Consumed and after it shipped it Unconsumed

    Hi All
    apprcate you help on the issue bellow :
    we manage the forecast Via Oracle forecast set Form name is : MRPFFDIF
    we set the prpfile MRP:Consume Fcst Set Summary to Yes
    Customer expectation is that when running consumption only open sales orders will be consumed
    but when sales order has been consumed and day after shipped and close
    sales order consumed data will be save and not unconsumed when consumption is running again
    the bellow scenario example the issue :
    Day 1
    Forecast Origin Qty = 10
    Open So = 5
    when running consumption forecast current qty will be 5
    On Day 2 we shipped the So qty (5) and it become close
    when running consumption the Origin Qty become 10 and this is not reasonable
    the expectation is that Current Qty will be remain 5 as it was on day1
    Thanks in Advance          

    Hi All
    apprcate you help on the issue bellow :
    we manage the forecast Via Oracle forecast set Form name is : MRPFFDIF
    we set the prpfile MRP:Consume Fcst Set Summary to Yes
    Customer expectation is that when running consumption only open sales orders will be consumed
    but when sales order has been consumed and day after shipped and close
    sales order consumed data will be save and not unconsumed when consumption is running again
    the bellow scenario example the issue :
    Day 1
    Forecast Origin Qty = 10
    Open So = 5
    when running consumption forecast current qty will be 5
    On Day 2 we shipped the So qty (5) and it become close
    when running consumption the Origin Qty become 10 and this is not reasonable
    the expectation is that Current Qty will be remain 5 as it was on day1
    Thanks in Advance          

  • Sale order to consume Sale forecast created by MD81

    Dear Gurus,
    I have created a sale forecast using T-code MD81, 'CusReq" is reflected in MD04...I conduct a planning run and planned orders are generated and subsequent process orders and this stock is now credited to WH stock... But the "CusReq" is not disappearing from MD04, as a result of which When I am creating a sale order Using VA01, it is only showing available qty in WH as remainder after the MD81 Requirement...
    How can I make the sale order consume the sale forecast (CIR) that was created using MD81.??
    Regards
    Sri.

    Dear Mr.Raja sekaran,
    Pls try to refer the below links which will helps you to solve your issue.
    Sales Order Conversion to Production Order
    Integration between PP and SD module
    Make to order Flow in SAP
    Regards,
    N.S.Rao

  • Sale order not consuming sale forecast

    Dear Gurus,
    I have created a sale forecast using T-code MD81, 'CusReq" is reflected in MD04...I conduct a planning run and planned orders are generated and subsequent process orders and this stock is now credited to WH stock... But the "CusReq" is not disappearing from MD04, as a result of which When I am creating a  sale order Using VA01, it is only showing available qty in WH as remainder after the MD81 Requirement...
    How can I make the sale order consume the sale forecast (CIR) that was created using MD81.??
    Regards
    Sri.
    Edited by: srirag nair on Aug 26, 2009 1:34 PM

    Hi,
    Customer Indepnedent requirement is a sales order as treated by MRP.
    The sales order consumption works with PIR not with Customer requirements.
    Further in most cases, consumption means not PIR reduction.
    it is consuming the planned orders created for PIR's by allocating to sales orders.
    For ex; in a MTS scenario,
    PIR ---1000
    PLanned order 1000
    Sales order 1500
    After MRP
    PIR--1000
    PLanned order 1000
    Planned order 500
    Sales order 1500
    PIR reduction from MD04 happens when GI happens for the sales order or GR for Production order depending the Planning strategy.
    Regards
    Ratan

  • Unconfirmed Sales Orders should not consume Forecast

    Hi All,
    We have an issue where the Unconfirmed Sales Order consumes the Forecast in APO. As per the requirement we only want to have Consumption of Forecast against the Confirmed Sales Order. Please suggest how we can stop this.
    The Planning Strategy in Product Master is maintained as 20 (PLANNING WITH FINAL ASSEMBLY), corresponding in R/3 is 40.
    fyi, we use APO 3.1. 
    Thanks,
    Aashish

    Hi Aashish,
    You might set the "fixed date and quantity flag" for the unconfirmed items so they will not generate a requirement and thus they will not be transfered to APO. But the order will also never appear in a APO BOP run...
    Another option would be to switch off the consumption in the APO inbound processing (userexit) when a sales order without confirmation arrives.
    best regards,
    Michael

  • How to delay stock confirmation during sales order creation

    We have following requirement -
    Whenever an order is created, even though stock exists, it should not confirm it right away. We need the delivery date to be current date + 7 days.
    This will help us avoid new orders consuming the stock.
    For example:
    Order 1 created; There was no stock; Hence no confirmation
    Order 2 created; There was no stock; Hence no confirmation
    Order 3 created; There is stock; At this stage, the order quantity should not be confirmed even though there is stock since there are 2 old orders waiting.
    Therefore whenever an order created, delivery date should be in future so that older orders get first preference when stock is available. This is material specific i.e., for  some it might be 7 days and for few it might be 10 days.
    We either want the delivery date to be a future date or the order quantity should not be confirmed even though there is stock.
    We saw that there is lead time in the sales order type customizing, but this will be applicable to all the materials which is not what we want.
    Is there any way we can achieve this by just customization and not use user exits.

    Hi Kantur Shekar madhuri,
    Would you confirm the whether in your schedule line category is activated for "Product Allocation" or not.
    if not please activate and re run your scenario.
    Regards
    Arun

  • Messages from topic to multiple consumers are not ordered the same way

    Hi,
    We have a distributed topic. The message producer is a multi-threaded/connection producer (OSB in our case).
    On the other side of the DT there are single connection consumers.
    Our problem is that the consumers sometimes recieve the messages in different order:
    Consumer A recieves message N and then N+1 (correct behaviour).
    Consumer B recieves message N+1 and then N (correct behaviour).
    This does not happen all the time. Most of the time the order is correct (99.9..%).
    We also noticed that the message timestamp for message N and N+1 is the same.
    This creates a problem for our system since both consumers must get the messages in the same order.
    We cannot use UOO.
    Any idea if this is a correct behavior for DT?
    Any idea how to make the messages get to all consumers in the same order without using UOO?
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Hmm. You may have run into some new Bug given since "message timestamp for message N and N+1 is the same". First, let's dot our I's and cross our Ts to make sure that the system is setup in a way that will give you good ordering in the first place:
    - Always use the same producer instance for each sequential send, and ensure that the producer's connection factory has "load balance" set to false. Note that OSB may be using a pool of producers implicitly for your sending app underneath-the-covers, which could lead to out-of-order, as different producers can load balance to different servers in your cluster. (I'm not sure how to check for this - if you provide a code snippet, I may be able to tell if this is happening.)
    - Ensure that you only ever have a single thread processing the subscription - if you're using MDBs to receive from the subscription, then you need to ensure the MDB is setup to only startup a single thread (use a thread pool of size and/or set max-beans-in-free-pool to one)
    - To account for out-of-order after app message processing failures (redelivery) with async consumers or MDBs, you need to (A) never configure redelivery delays, and (B) ensure the connection factory Maximum Messages setting is tuned down to 1 (it's default is 10).
    I don't know how to do the above with OSB, which tends to layer it's own configuration on top of WL JMS configuration.
    Assuming that you've assured all of the above, then you may have run into some sort of bug and I recommend filing a request with Oracle Support. In the mean-time, you might want to explore alternatives:
    - Are you certain that you can't use UOO? It would be interesting to know why. This is a widely used feature (even by OSB itself), and it may be that you can enable it without any code change, plus, even if a code change is required, such changes tend to be isolated and small. In your use case, it looks like you may be able to configure a default UOO on the distributed topic itself (http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11035_01/wls100/wlsmbeanref/core/index.html) - no code change needed - so that every destination member of your distributed destination will simply ensure that each new message is given the same UOO (a UOO that's particular to that member). OSB may provide some equivalent knob. Alternatively, you can code up your app so that each of your producers sets a useful UOO on each message.
    - I assume you're using a replicated distributed topic (RDT). If there actually is a bug, then it would likely have something to do with the RDT's internal forwarders. If your consumers are MDBs or the SOA RA Adapter, then a simple alternative may be to use a Partitioned Distributed Topic (PDT) instead -- PDTs have no forwarders, and the MDB and the SOA RA Adapter can work with them transparently. If your consumers are neither of these, then working with a PDT will likely require that you use extensions (an advanced path that you may not want to take the time to follow).
    Tom

Maybe you are looking for