Purchase Order in Stand Alone Scenario

Hi experts
i'd like to know if is possible to create a Purchase Order in SRM 5.0 (stand alone scenario) with position "Limit".
I'd like also to know if is possible to create Purchase Orders with 2 or more lines.
I'm sure that is possible to creat Shopping Cart with position "Limit".
Regards
Andrea

Hi Olga,
Are you creating RFQ from scratch or from Sourcing Cockpit ?
If from SOCO, the Bid data can be completed with originating SC data. Otherwise data needs to be completed.
Have a look at "processing bids" part of bidding engine help:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/d3/133dcd5641b244a60578baa996a597/content.htm
It is stated that in case of contract creation, you have to complete the "user-defined" contract item to add data, for example product or vendor product number.
For PO creation, there is nothing about "user-defined" items.
I analyzed this process in an SRM 5.0, and it looks correct: added items are passed to the PO.
For local PO creation, all the logic is done in BBP_QUOTE_PO_CREATE.
Here are steps for SRM 5.0
- read quote details (items and additional items)
- read RFQ details
- retrieve RFQ long texts
- fill PO header and complete it with ACS & BUK attributes of connected user
- merge normal & supplier added items (GOOD !!!!!)
- process items
- complete partners
- process texts
- process attachments
- BADI to determine purch group
- create the PO with BBP_PD_PO_CREATE
So it should work.
Debug this process starting with function BBP_QUOTE_PO_CREATE, or open an OSS message.
Rgds
Christophe

Similar Messages

Confirmation button is disabled Stand alone scenario

Hello ,
We are using SRM 7.00 , Stand alone scenario.
We need to create a confirmation upon a shopping cart that has been procceced to PO with status 'Ordered' .
The button 'Create Confirmation' is disabled .
We implimented ABAP role /SAPPSSRM/EMPLOYEE and Portal role Employee Self Services .
Thanks,
Malki Shacham
MM - SRM consultant

Hi Malki,
Did you get this issue fixed?
We are also facing similar issue in SRM 7.0 Ehp1 stand alone scenario.
The Shopping cart has got successfully converted to P.O and the P.O is in ordered status and the 'Confirmation Required' check box is checked.
In case this issue has been fixed can you let us know the resolution ?
Early response would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Teja

Purchase Order Response in Classic Scenario

Hi Experts,
Implementation Scenario- CLASSIC
SRM Server - 5.0
Question-
1) Within Classic Scenario, is it possible for to create Purchase Order Response in SRM for a PO which is already created in backend? This PO is generated by a shopping cart in SRM.
Best Regards,
Amit

Hi Amit,
You can create POR for a PO which is already created in backend, no matter if its created with reference to SC in SRM. This POR would be done by the supplier in SUS scenario.
It possible in both, classic and ECS scenario's.
Regards,
Prashant

Purchase Order Creation, Extended Classic Scenario

Can someone please explain the different databse tables affected during the creation of a Purchase Order.
Also, is there a transaction with which we can create PO in Extended classic scenario?

hi,
below are the tables effected while creation of PO:
CRMD_ORDERADM_H
CRMD_ORDERADM_I
BBP_PDIGP
BBP_PDBEI
BBP_PDISB
BBP_PDISS
BBP_PDSDLN
BBP_PDACC
BBP_PDTAX
BBP_PDATT
BBP_PDORG
BBP_PDWGT
BBP_PDDYN
BBP_PDEXR
PRCD_ITEM
PRCD_COND
PRCD_COND
BBP_PDDEP
CRMD_PARTNER
as far as your second question is concerned normally we will be creating a PO in SRM/EBP in web browser and it will replicate to the backend ERP.
regards
IGA

OPEN purchase order for Extended classic scenario

Hello All,
I want to is there any way to find out Open PO in SAP SRM
like ME2* reports in MM
Can I extract the report via CRMD_ORDERADM* tables?
Thanks
Raman

Hi,
You can try the foll:
1st way is to look into the standard tables in the SRM system
CRMD_ORDERADM_H (Header Data)
and
CRMD_ORDERADM_I (Item Data)
for the Business object type - BUS2201 (Purchase Orders)
2nd way is using BBP_PD Transaction for the Business object type - BUS2201 (Purchase Orders) (The transaction calls the same tables to fetch the details)
3rd way using the standard function modules - BBP_PO_GET_DETAIL / BBP_PD_PO_GETLIST ,In the FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETLIST " ,you have the import parameter "I_IV_OPEN",try to use that for reteriveing the list of open Po's.
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers.

Purchase order replication – extended classic scenario using XML proxy via PI

Hi Experts
Question:
In case of extended classic deployment is it possible to use XML proxy to
transfer SRM purchase orders to ECC? As we know as of SRM 7.01 its via RFC
whether SRM 7.02 onwards does SAP support XML for ECS too?
Has
anyone read about this in any of the SAP forums?
Background: In our project, client have invested
heavily on XI and XI monitoring and troubleshooting, integrated to SAP SOLMAN.
And would like to opt for XML mode of transfer and reuse existing solution.
This is the main reason we would like to be very clear in our understanding
before we go back to client.
We appreciate your time and support.
Regards
Prashanth

Dear Rahul,
Thanks for you input
Let me give you an example of the behaviour:
in PPOMA_BBP TOG assigned to user has : DQ with $1000 and upper percentage 5%.
User orders a PO with quantity=1000, price $100;
No additional tolerances assigned in the PO itself
User tries to enter confirmation with quantity 1001 (so qty variance converted to currency amount results in $100 over delivery) So the confirmation is under both the 5% and the $1000 limit.
In that case I donu2019t receive an error message from the SRM, but the error message u201CBackend Purchase Order quantity exceeded by 1 EAu201D from ECC still prevents me from posting the Confirmation. And this is the problem I havenu2019t been able to solve so far.
So I want the TOG tolerance to be used. And I am also happy with the absolute limit always having priority over percentage limit...
But I am trying to find a way to get rid of the back end message (with assigning a tolerance to the PO itself as the will get rid of the absolute limit see my previous post.)
Cheers
Ulrike

Custom fields to be included in Purchase Order in MM-SUS scenario

Hello,
We need to include some custom fields in Purchase Order, that is transferred from ERP to SUS system. We are in SRM 7.01 and the communication from ERP to SUS happens via PI using the standard PI service.
There is a SAP note 762984 for adding custom fields. Will this be applicable for our case also. Else what will be the standard approach.
thanks
Arindam.

Hi Srikanth,
Through partner dtermination you can get this requirement.
First you assign farwarding agent partner function CR in your sale document Header Partner procedure and item procedure.
Do the farwarding function assignment to delivery partner procedure and billing procedure also.
You create Master data in XK01 transaction with 0005 account group for that forwarding agent.
Now while creating sales order you enter that partner function and number of the farwarding agent(Which you got in XK01) in sales order -->Header >partner function or sales order> item-->partner functions.
System will carry these partner up to billing.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Purchase as a stand alone?

Is Captivate CS3 a part of CS3? or is it a stand alone
product? I cannot find it listed in one of the CS3 groups.

quote:
Originally posted by:
Captiv8r
Hi Janet A.
While it probably won't always be the case
, at the moment, Captivate is a single product and as
such, is not part of any suite. But stay tuned, as things are
constantly changing in the software world. Who knows what may
happen?
Cheers... Rick
OK, Rick...spill...whaddayaknow?

FM for getting PO details in stand alone scenario

Hi Experts,
we are running a standalone scenario in SRM
we need to pull the PO details that have schedule line item schedules and item service entries.
can anybody help me out.
Thanks&Regards,
Praveen

Hi Jay,
when i execute the function module BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL the schedule line items table is empty, i am not getting any data
.could you please suggest some other way so as to get the concerned details.
BR,
Praveen

If I purchase Lightroom 5 (stand-alone) now

Will I be eligible for a free upgrade to 6 when it comes out?

Wait for version 6.
Nobody (other than Adobe and select friends) know when Lr 6 will be released. My guess (and who cares) is that it will be within the next three months when a new Camera Raw (version 9) is released. Perhaps that will also include the 2015 release of Photoshop.

IWeb purchased as a stand alone

I am looking to buy just iWeb, but it looks like you have to get the entire iLife package? Sorry if this is a dumb question but my Mac came with Garageband, etc. and I am assuming iLIfe has upgrades to those and is the only way to get iWeb by itself?
I have not been able to find iWeb by itself on the Apple site.
Thanks
Rockhound

The only way to get iWeb is buying the iLife package.
There is no way to get iWeb as a standalone application.
The package contains newer versions (improved, and with new features) of the applications you previously mentioned. It's an upgrade.
Regards,
Cédric
PS: 79$ is really cheap for such an amount of software...
They could also sell you iWeb-only for 79$ I guess

Combined Purchase Order and Sales Order Query. (Including Stand Alone Docs)

Hi,
I need some help please!
I am looking for a query that will show all the Purchase Orders with all their base document Sales Orders. However I also need to show those stand alone Purchase orders and Sales Orders.
What I have is two queries, one for the PO fields en one for The SO fields. I would like a way to combine these two so I have one query with the relevant PO and SO info next to each other.
The final query will have a top heading structure like this:
Status,Purchase No.,Supplier No.,Supplier Name,Week,Month,Del Method,Country,Method,Rep.|Status,Rep.,Sales No.,Customer No.,Customer Name,Customer Order no.,Cust. Del date,Doc total,Del Method
+(The first part is for the purchase order section, the second part starting at the second 'Status' is the sales order section)
+Purchase Order Query:
SELECT
T0.DocStatus 'Status',
T0.DocNum'Purchase Order No.',
T0.CardCode 'Supplier No.',
T0.CardName'Supplier Name',
DATEPART(ww,T0.DocDuedate)'Week',
DATEPART(mm,T0.DocDuedate) 'Month',
T1.TrnspName 'Delivery Method',
T2.Country 'Country',
T0.JrnlMemo 'Method',
T3.SlpName 'Rep.'
FROM OPOR T0
INNER JOIN OSHP T1 ON T0.TrnspCode = T1.TrnspCode
INNER JOIN OCRD T2 ON T0.CardCode = T2.CardCode
INNER JOIN OSLP T3 ON T0.SlpCode = T3.SlpCode
Sales Order Query:
SELECT
T0.DocStatus 'Status',
T2.SlpName 'Rep.',
T0.DocNum 'Sales Order No.',
T0.CardCode 'Customer No.',
T0.CardName 'Customer Name',
T0.NumAtCard 'Customer Order no.',
T0.DocDueDate 'Cust. Delivery date',
T0.DocTotal ' Doc total',
T1.TrnspName ' Delivery Method'
FROM ORDR T0
INNER JOIN OSHP T1 ON T0.TrnspCode = T1.TrnspCode
INNER JOIN OSLP T2 ON T0.SlpCode = T2.SlpCode
The problem I am having is that if I combine these queries it excludes all those records with blank/empty data fields.
I do not mind having to go to crystal reports to get what I want.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!

Hi thanks GordonDu,
I have tried a union before, and yours works great. However my problem is to display the PO en SO columns next to each other and not underneath each other.
Something like this:
Po No          Supplier          SO No           Customer
1234           Sup 1             9876              Cust 1
1235           Sup 2             no SO             Cust 2
1236           Sup 3             9877              Cust 3
1237           Sup 4             9878              Cust 4
1238           Sup 5             no SO             Cust 4
I have this query, but with this it drops all those Purchase Orders made Stand Alone and without a SO number.
SELECT
T2.DocNum AS 'Purchase Order No.',
T0.DocNum AS 'Sales Order No.',
T2.CardCode AS 'Supplier No.',
T2.CardName AS 'Supplier Name'
FROM ORDR T0
   INNER JOIN RDR1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
   INNER JOIN OPOR T2 ON T2.DocEntry = T1.PoTrgEntry
Though using your Union gives me all the information I want and the ability to expand on that, my problem is the "Display" part. I am sure I am doing something stupid somwhere
Edited by: Desmond Moll on Mar 7, 2012 8:03 AM

Reg: Open Purchase order

Hi Guru,
as per the Budget change,
One of the tasks that has to be done as a part of the change in budget is the updation of info-record condition records in open purchase orders.
In terms of open purchase orders there are two scenarios..
Fully Open and Partially open.
For Fully open purchase orders - In the Purchase orer we have to change manually or what i will do.
For Partially Open Purchase orders - Business will take responsibility.
thanks
kannan somasundaram

Hi All,
the budget change date is 07.12.2008. but we create some purchase order before the 07.12.2008. for these purchase order also we need to get 10% instead of 14%.
how can i have to change that details.
please give me the solution on this issue.
thanks

Invoce is allowed more than purchase order

Dear Experts,
In my case, in few scnarios we are creating the purchase order but not creating the GR. We are doing MIRO directly with reference to purchase order. In tihs scenario, if PO quanity is 100, sap allows me to post the invoice with quanity 101 or 200, how can I restrict the same, so that quanity should never be more than purchase order quantity.
Thanks
Shailesh

Hi,
As you are doing MIRO wrt PO without GR, then
Use T.code: OMRM & Maintain the message M8 -087 - Invoice quantity greater than PO quantity ( item without GR) as error"E" and save.
Also set message M8 -087 as error"E" in OBMSG t.code & save.
Now try ur transaction.
Regards,
Biju K

VPRS Costs From Purchase Order Account Assignment To Sales Order

Hi,
If i assign a purchase order costs to a sales order using the account assignment category C or E, can the purchase order costs be passed on to VPRS condition type of the sales order?
This is different from third party order processing. I know for third party order processing the VPRS costs can be passed from the purchase order, but my above scenario is different from third party order function whereby i create a purchase order and a sales order separately and then link them using the account assignment category of the purchase order and need to know if the VPRS cost can be updated from the purchase order.
Has anyone tried this?

Has anyone tried this?
I never tried this, but looks like similar to third party scenario only. You can just test the scenario to understand the system behavior. For details on how the VPRS is calculated by the system, you can refer OSS Note 372772 - How is the cost determined?
Regards,

Purchase Order in Stand Alone Scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for