Query on Vehicle Stock Transfer/Transport issue in SAP Service Manager 4.0

Hi All,
I am working on Syclo Service Manager4.0 with vehicle component along with SMP 2.3 SP03
While testing the vehicle component Stock transfer and Stock Transport I got some error related to the Bapi wrappers
When checked in the logs the correct Bapi wrapper are being called ie /SMCRM/MM_DOMATERIALSTOCK_GET and /SMCRM/MM_DOPURCHASEORDER_GET
Internally it is making call to /SMERP/MM_DOMATERIALSTOCK_GET and SMERP/MM_DOPURCHASEORDER_GET which is not existing in the SAP system.
Below is the log for the two errors which I received :
2014/03/25 09:02:14.381:              execute::::TECH1::before BAPI execute: /SMCRM/MM_DOMATERIALSTOCK_GET
2014/03/25 09:02:15.200:            + User=tech1 2014/03/25 09:02:15.200:              execute::::TECH1::after BAPI execute: /SMCRM/MM_DOMATERIALSTOCK_GET
2014/03/25 09:02:15.202:            + User=tech1 2014/03/25 09:02:15.202:              checkForErrors::1::message ID::E:: - 000
2014/03/25 09:02:15.204:            + User=tech1 2014/03/25 09:02:15.204:              checkForErrors::1::message::E::25.03.
2014 09:02:14 - /SYCLO/CX_CORE_PROXY:RFC Function /SMERP/MM_DOMATERIALSTOCK_GET does not exist in system SSM40_ERP_IM_HOST
2014/03/25 09:02:15.206:            + User=tech1 2014/03/25 09:02:15.206:              throwExceptionToClient::begin
2014/03/25 09:02:15.207:            + User=tech1
2014/03/25 09:02:15.207:              : 2 lines, 0 non-printing characters, 275 total characters throwExceptionToClient::com.syclo.sap.component.stock.steplet.StockExternalFetchSteplet::throwExceptionToClient::43::StockExternalFetchSteplet - 25.03.2014 09:02:14 - /SYCLO/CX_CORE_PROXY:RFC Function /SMERP/MM_DOMATERIALSTOCK_GET does not exist in system SSM40_ERP_IM_HOST
2014/03/25 15:07:58.514:            + User=tech1
2014/03/25 15:07:58.514:              execute::::TECH1::before BAPI execute: /SMCRM/MM_DOPURCHASEORDER_GET
2014/03/25 15:07:59.297:            + User=tech1
2014/03/25 15:07:59.297:              execute::::TECH1::after BAPI execute: /SMCRM/MM_DOPURCHASEORDER_GET 2014/03/25 15:07:59.300:            + User=tech1
2014/03/25 15:07:59.300:              checkForErrors::1::message ID::E:: - 000
2014/03/25 15:07:59.302:            + User=tech1
2014/03/25 15:07:59.302:              checkForErrors::1::message::E::25.03.2014 15:08:00 - /SYCLO/CX_CORE_PROXY:RFC Function /SMERP/MM_DOPURCHASEORDER_GET does not exist in system SSM40_ERP_IM_HOST 2014/03/25 15:07:59.304:            + User=tech1
2014/03/25 15:07:59.304:              throwExceptionToClient::begin
2014/03/25 15:07:59.306:            + User=tech1
2014/03/25 15:07:59.306:              : 2 lines, 0 non-printing characters, 287 total characters throwExceptionToClient::com.syclo.sap.component.stock.steplet.StockTransportOrderFetchSteplet::throwExceptionToClient::43::StockTransportOrderFetchSteplet - 25.03.2014 15:08:00 - /SYCLO/CX_CORE_PROXY:RFC Function /SMERP/MM_DOPURCHASEORDER_GET does not exist in system SSM40_ERP_IM_HOST
Is there any additional setting/configuration which is missing for vehicle component? Please advise.
Thanks and Regards
Neha Mahanty

Looks like your missing RFC destination "SSM40_ERP_IM_HOST" on CRM system. Create RFC destination from CRM to ECC with "SSM40_ERP_IM_HOST" name or you can choose your own name. Also make sure that trusted system connections are created between CRM & ECC system, so that applicaiton can use same user id as CRM. You also need to additional authorization objects related "S_TRUSTED " added to user role to excute BAPI's on ECC system. Your Basis folks should be able to help you.
In order to work with Inventory functionality , all the mobile users will need to have the Authorization Profile ERP_TRUSTED assigned to them . There should be the Trusted RFC connection between CRM and ERP, and the users need this authorization profile in order for them to download their trunk stock and perform the Inventory Transactions from their mobile device.
Authorization object: S_RFCACL
For more details on this topic, please refer to following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/8b/0010519daef443ab06d38d7ade26f4/content.htm
Thanks
Manju Mobility - RIG

Similar Messages

Issue working with WPF client v6.1.0.3 for SAP Service Manager 4.0

Hi All,
This issue is similar to an on - going discussion - http://scn.sap.com/thread/3508608
Issue Description :
1. We installed WPF client 6.1.03 for SAP Service Manager 4.0 using SMP 2.3 SP00. We got the below error
2. To solve this error we followed the forum - http://scn.sap.com/thread/3465106 and installed the certificate following the link for installing the self signed certificate from Sybase infocenter.
3. We came to know that this is due to the SMP version. hence as suggested by SAP we upgraded the server to SMP 2.3 SP03
4. We tried to connect the WPF client and again got the error "Communication error 14"
My Question is
1. After the server upgrade from SP2.3 SP03 , do I still need to generate a certificate again ? Is yes Please guide me the steps/document to do this step
2. Is there any document which mentions how exactly we use the WPF client, the configuration to connect the SAP backend and download the Syclo Service Manager 4.0 application without any issue
Please guide
Thanks
Neha

HI Steve,
I tested with the WPF client 6.1.3.X.
I was getting a different error with the host name "Connect to server myhostname certificate is for myhostname:domain name this is not valid. Commnication error(14)
However I got the solution in one of the link where they mention to provide the complete fully qualified domain name in the server ie myhostname:domain .
This has solved the issue and the WPF client is up and running.
Thanks for the help
Regards
Neha Mahanty

Inter company stock transfer control issue

Hello All,
In inter company Stock Transfer process, plant A has received scheduling agreement or PO from plant B. Is there any possibility of receiving material by plant B w/o sending / dispatching material by plant A? I guess this should not be possible.. but in our case it is happening. Being document type is of ZUB (which is similar process as intra company process).. also we have implemented WM. Material issuance or receipt will happen from outbound or inbound process.
Though there is a process violation but system would have restricted user not to receive materials. Can someone let me know is there any configuration issue ? If yes how to fix the issue? If no how to restrict user?
Edited by: Krish9 on Aug 13, 2011 10:03 PM

Hi,
As per your scenario you described, it is rather unclear what you are trying to achieve there.
How would the stock posting be balanced if we do not relief materials from Plant A if we are receiving it in Plant B?
The stock have to come from somewhere in order for Plant B to receive it. The same quantity of stock has to be reduced accordingly from the source plant (be it Plant A or some other plants).
I reckon if you just merely do not want to reflect that the stock is being dispatched from Plant A to Plant B, then you may want to consider using a dummy plant to represent Plant A or something to that effect.
Hope the above helps.
Thanks.

Intercompany Stock transfer pricing issue

Hi Experts
scenario is intercompany stock transfer with invoice
In Intercompany stock transfer scenario in pricing procedure the condition type PI01 is statistical
if i put only PI01 then system calculate right net value (quantity multiply by rate)
but if i put ZPR0 and Discount Zk04 then System calculate net value only w.r.t. PI01 condition and not consider the ZPR0 and ZK04 in calculation for net value
whats the problem
please suggest
thanks in advance

Hi,
Please set the pricing type C in the copy control. Also set the price source A that is purchase order in the copy control at item level.
Hope this will help.
Thanks and regards,
Atul

Query related to Stock Transfer special procurement key.

Hi PP Gurus,
One conflict I got regarding to Special Procurement Key 40 (Stock transfer). Here in one plant material XYZ is getting produced in-house as well as procured from Alternate plant also.
Initially I configured Spcl Prct key 40 taking XYZ (for example) in Demanding plant (say 1003) as externally procured through material master with spcl prct key 40 and Supplying plant (say 1001) In-house produced through material master.
Now the requirement is to produce material XYZ In-house in Demanding plant (1003) as well as Stock transfer through Supplying plant (1001).
As per my information for material handled through STO in Material master procurement type=F with splcl prct key=40 should be maintained in Demanding plant (1003)
And
In Supplying plant (1001) through Material master Procurement type= E without Spcl prct key= 40.
If we change Procurement type from F to X in Demanding plant material master, does it support special procurement key and STO? Is it possible through some other solution? What could be the impact in Std. cost estimate and Product Cost Collector?
Thanks & Regards,
Abu Arbab

Hi Alex,
Thanks for valuable reply. SAP doesn't support Special procurement key for stock transfer with Procurement Type=X. I think two options one of the following options are suitable for such scenarios.
1. Reply from SAP
2. Quota Arrangement
3. Creation if New material code and new production version for Semi-finished product in plant 1003. That is some what tedious. There is a valuable reply from Rajesha Vittal in this context to one of my last threads subjected [ Special Procurement Key- Withdrawl from alternate plant (40)|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forums]
I let decision on Client whatever the way he wants will map the process through one of above options
Here is the reply from SAP
Normally for a material which is to be produced internally(inhouse production) and also procured externally the material type 'X' is used in the material master.
Typically, If the material is sometimes produced in house and sometimes completly procured externally depending upon your capacity availability then the procurement type 'X' could ensure that you always have a
planned order created in the planning(MRP run).Then you would have to decide later whether the material has to be produced in house or procured externally. If it has to be produced inhouse you could convert
the planned order to Production/process order in MD04 else if the material is to be procured externally you could rater convert the planned order to a purchase requisition and then later could be
converted to a purchase order.
However kindly note that the special procurement type of stock transfer can not work with 'X' in standard, so even if you set the procument key to X in the material master it will not be read as the system will only
look at the procument key of the special procurement type. This is also apparent in the warning message that you recieve when you set 'X' and 40in the material master: Message no. M3 675 ::The procurement type of the special procurement type is F.
Unfortunately there is not a setting for X for the special procurement in the transaction OPPQ. To achieve this you will need to implement a modification. Please be aware that modifications are not supported by
the support department of SAP.
Workaround:
Typically, if you have such a scenario I would think that you would set this key for the majority of the transactions, ie, 90% of the time this material is truly stock transferred. However if you have to decide laterwhether the material has to be produced in house or stock transfer you could plan it as type 'X' without the special procurement key and later in MD04 convert the planned order and change the material master back again.
Or you may set procurement type 'E' and create PO manually for stock
transfer.
Best Regards,
Abu Arbab
Edited by: abu arbaba on Dec 2, 2008 10:06 AM

On Demand attachment download issue in SAP Work Manager 6.0

We are using SAP Work Manager 6.0 app with SMP 2.3. System is configured to download attachments for external DMS using this document http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90087094-ddad-3110-cdab-e6dbc1a12e45?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&59236188953046
While we tried to download the attachment, the download request was sent to SAP
We checked through Push Instance monitor in Syclo Admin panel, a push request was there for scenario ID SM60_DMS_DOCUMENT_PUSH with status PROCESS. Status was set to NEW under Subscriber view tab of this push request.
We checked following things:
1. Push was enabled for Agentry Server in JavaBE.ini
2. Port 8282 was maintained in outbound trigger settings & in Agentry.ini configurations. This port is only used by Agentry Server.
3. SCC displays the error for the WorkManager application as XFailedToSendResponse: 9,1,16, smp_mobile
Regards,
Sahil Dudeja
Tags edited by: Michael Appleby

We are still facing this issue.

High Watermark issue with monitoring Service Manager 2012 R2

Hi,
Our customer has a Service Manager / Operations Manager 2012 R2 environment where SCOM will regularly generate an alarm related to High Watermark monitoring on the Service Manager data warehouse - not every day though. The alarm looks like this:
Value of 3559 is not higher than 3559
This value hasn't changed for weeks.
Having done a lot of searching we have found nothing but reference to the same recurring flow of information where people keep mentioning different values but there is no conclusion of what this might be caused by and how to solve it. The solutions
have become outdated anyway. Here is one example:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/systemcenter/en-US/889af8f3-cdf8-4d88-ae99-5dbe18d529ef/service-manager-2012-data-warehouse-high-watermark-monitor
The Service Manager Database Account in SCOM is our service account that has sysadmin in SQL. Basically, with regards to the security configuration, our customer should be covered.
To my knowledge agent-based and agentless monitoring have both been supported since SCSM 2012 SP1. Also, we have the latest management pack for Service Manager monitoring in SCOM, at the moment this should be
7.5.3079.0.
As mentioned above the value has not been changing for quite some time and nor has it in the database.
My questions are the following:
- Is there anyone that has found a solution in the meantime, especially with regards to R2?
- What is the purpose of High Watermark monitoring for the data warehouse? Why does this need to be monitored?
- We would like to understand the nature of this value better. Should it be higher each day compared to the day before?
- Could it just be overriden in SCOM?
Many thanks in advance!

Rather unexpectedly, the SCOM alarm disappeared overnight and when checking the workflow in the incident that was generated from the alarm, the incident got a Resolved status right before midnight at 23:59:58. We have a ConfigMgr connector that is scheduled
to run at 23:00 which we had disabled a day ago to check something else. But I don't think it had anything to do with this. As the alarm has disappeared from the SCOM console, we have also checked the registry values. Now, instead of "3559 3559 3559"
it says "3559 3559 3585". We have had the 3559 value since 18th July, and out of a sudden something must have been triggered, causing the value to increase. What was triggered and how, no idea... Not sure either what it means that only one of the
Three numbers have been updated with a new value. When talking about the DW jobs, using the SMlets we can see every day that, MPSync, DWMaintenance and the ETL jobs are working well. What we have had though for a longer time is that the cube processing
tends to have issues once a week, where processing won't finish and the cubes get hanging in a running state. We can fix that manually every time and often we don't even have to touch DWMaintenance or the ETL jobs, we don't need to go beyond manually
working with the cube processing jobs themselves. So it might not have an impact on the ETL jobs themselves. Occasionally we do find ourselves in a situation where we we need to play around in the SQL database and manually set the required value (can't
recall if it's 3, 6 or 7) cause we get an error in the DWMaintenance batch, but even though that's an occasional issue it's not constant and also something we can solve, and furthermore it's another known issue outside of the high watermark issue. So
we are a bit uncertain but can at least see that something works sometimes that sometimes increases the high watermark value :). In our case.

Performance issue within SAP Solution Manager

We use SAP Solution Manager 4.0, SPS 13 for System Monitoring of almost 100 systems.
We configured SOLMAN as CEN system and activated the CCMSPING with push option.
For almost the 2/3 of the systems we configured SAPCCM4X agents.
Our current problem is a performance issue in tcode DSWP. When we try to enter into one of the solutions there (by pressing on it) we get the following warning:
Determining warning messages from CCMS
It tooks a while and then it is possible to access the desired solution.
My important question is of course:
How can this issue be solved?
Is there some techniques to analyse and change the problem
How can I check whether the SOLMAN works in a pull or push mode, when the data from the satellite systems will be collected and how can this be changed?
As I know there are two ways of sending/retrieving the data:
via RFC (pull)
via CCMS (push)
Which method is faster?
Is there some changes in CCMSPING possible? (interval for sending/retrieving the data)?
Is there some other settings, e.g. like profle parameters (e.g. rdisp/...) that could be performed to solve the problem?
Thank you very much for any helpful information
Regards
Thom

Push is beter for performance. SAP advice.
Maybe activating Central Data Cache on the CEN and SolMan with parameter alert/cache/size_MB can help.
more info here: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/10/75ea3b6d73e807e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm

Stock transfer between Batch and Non Batch managed Plants

Hi
Plant A is Batch Managed and Plant B is not batch managed.
When I do STO, I want the Batch data from Plant A to be stored in some custom tables (when Inbound delivery is received in Plant B) as it is required for any recall and outbound purposes.
Batch level is unique at Plant level.
Please advise how can I go through the above scenario.
Thanks
Prabhakar

Hi Prabhakar
In STO, the supplying plant is the vendor (batch managed).
So, you may workout for an enhancement to fetch the supplying plant's batch number on to the vendor batch (Field: LICHA) during Goods receipt.
However, incase multiple batches, you should look for lines items in goods receipt.
warm regards
sairam akundi

Stock transfer between Plant/Storage location to Plant/Storage location

Dear Experts,
This is a MM component of SAP Retail.
We have 4 brands ( Plants of type B, Plants of type C etc) that needs inventory from the same Distribution center (Plant A) for some common products. Here the direction is to prioritize the inventory per brand. The requirement is one brand should not take the inventory of the other brand.
To overcome this problem , the solution proposed is to have different storage location for different brands in the same DC.
When we run replenishment planning for the brands and do a ATP check, the availability check should consider only the one issuing storage location in the DC which we allocated for the brand.
I do see the following set up in SPRO and I have done the following.
Step1: Activate Stock Transfer between Storage Locations SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations-> u2018Activate Stock transfer between storage locationsu2019
Step2: Assign Delivery Type and checking rule according to storage
SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations->Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule According to Storage
Step3: Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfer between Storage Locations
SPRO ->Material Management ->Purchasing ->Purchase Order ->set up stock transport order ->set up stock transport order between storage locations -> Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfers between Storage Locations 
Step4: Define Rule for Determination off Shipping Point SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations -> Set-up Storage-Location u2013dependent shipping point determination->Define rule for determination of shipping point
Step5: Shipping Point Assignment According to Storage Location
SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations-> Set-up Storage-Location u2013dependent shipping point determination-> Assign Shipping Points According to Storage Location
Question.No:1- After completing the above set up in me21n, the issuing storage location field is greyed out. I am not able to enter any value here. Can you please help.
Question.No:2
I do see the following setting.
Under IMG ---> Material Management ---> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Set up Stock Transport Order -->Business Add-In for Determination of Issuing Storage Location
Display the IMPLEMENTATION
Double click on the method GET_SUPPLYING_SL
Click the Execute button
Click the detail button on IF_EX_MD_EXT_SUP
Execute GET_SUPPLYING_SL
There is a prerequisite for this BADI .I have done those things.What i dont understand is where to force the combination of supplying site/issuing stor.loc/receiving site/receiving stor.loc
Kindly provide your inputs.
Thanks,
Vasanthan

Dear,
Have You configure MRP in second plant (where you want to transport the Material).
Please try with this and do again Po for stock transport.
Regards
Piyush Patel

Excise Invoice generation during stock transfer

Hello All,
For an excisable item it is a rule in indian localization whenever the goods leave the warehouse it has to carry a proper excise document. This is possible in case of a delivery. But how to manage this in case of stock transfer? When the excisable goods are transfered from one warehouse to another then a excise invoice is to be generated. How can this be managed in SAP Business One? Please suggest.I am using SAP Business One 2005B PL 41
Regards,
Debraj

This Functionality is not available in SAP 2005B.
As a workaround,
Create Journal Entry for Excise Duty & VAT
For Excise Invoice, create a seperare PLD in Inventory Transfer Screen
Note:
This feature of Excise Invoice generation during stock transfer is available in SAP 2007B
Edited by: Sridharan T on Sep 8, 2008 3:10 PM

Document on inter company stock transfer

How inter company stock transfer order with SD Delivery, billing & logistics invoice verification can be done?

Hi,
Please refer below links:
Working with Intercompany Stock Transfer - Billing (SD-BIL) - SAP ...
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-46122
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1222140
http://scn.sap.com/thread/472870

Change in A/C entry in stock transfer process..

Dear All,
In stock transfer process in std sap following are the a/c entries generated during goods movement
Movement type - 641
Stock account supplying plant - credit
Stock account receiving plant - Debit
And for movement type 101 there is no a/c entry generated.
However i want to configure below said scenario
Movement type - 641
Stock account supplying plant - credit
Stock in transit account - Debit
Movement type -101
Stock account receiving plant - Debit
Stock in transit account - credit
please let me know how to do the same..
Naren

Hi,
Though you create delivery and postGI using 641, it is considered to be received in receiving plant. It is standard. can't be changed.
This will be the case even if you do 303 and 305 (305 will not create acc doc)
Regards,
Antony
Edited by: Antony anburaj on Jan 3, 2011 1:28 PM

Excise Invoice cancellation against Stock Transfer Invoice

Dear All,
I am new to the India Localization. In one of my implementation, I have come to a scenario where I have generated an Excise Invoice for ISO (Stock Transfers from one IO to another). Now after ship confirm, I wanted to cancel the invoice as I have wrongly selected the lots/order. RMA process is not working as it is not hitting AR.
Pl suggest a solution.
Regards,
Gaurav

This Functionality is not available in SAP 2005B.
As a workaround,
Create Journal Entry for Excise Duty & VAT
For Excise Invoice, create a seperare PLD in Inventory Transfer Screen
Note:
This feature of Excise Invoice generation during stock transfer is available in SAP 2007B
Edited by: Sridharan T on Sep 8, 2008 3:10 PM

Issue with Surveys/Checklist in SAP Sservice Manager 4.0 for PPC Platform

Hi All,
I am working with SAP Service Manager 4.0 application . I was checking the Surveys functionality in the standard application and came to know that the surveys functionality is not available in PPC platform.
However it is present for Iphone/Ipad platforms.
After a detailed check I found that the button which initiates the survey List screens are available in iphone/ipad but not in PPC . where as the Surveys List screens is available for all the 3 platforms iphone/ ipad / PPC .
Is this a issue in the standard application or the Surveys is not included for PPC platform.
Please clarify
Thanks and Regards
Neha Mahanty

The surveys functionality was not included for PPC platform in the Service Manager 4.0 release. There was I beleive a technical issue that prevented it from being included. It may be included in a future release.
--Bill

Query on Vehicle Stock Transfer/Transport issue in SAP Service Manager 4.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for