R/3 report of transactions with trading partner

Hi
I posted intercompany transaction (using trading partner). I need to know if there is any tcode for R/3 report which will show transactions with trading partners. I require for AR AP GL transactions.
I came to know that there is some tcode which will show transaction of one trading partner in another books and vice versa. I checked into information system. But i didn't got.
Please let me know

Hi,
For reconciling associated companies, you can access these from the SAP application menu as follows:
SAP menu -> Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable or Accounts Payable -> Periodic Processing -> Closing -> Check/Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
These programs provide more functions and flexibility, and they enable you to reconcile data across different systems.
You carry out the Customizing for these programs in the SAP Customizing Guide under:
SPRO> Financial Accounting or Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Accounting -> Business Transactions -> Closing -> Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
Regards,
Gaurav

Similar Messages

Issue with Trading Partner Identification - Files are not picked

Hi,
As per user guide and also the following note
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/integration/b2b/pdf/B2B_TN_013_EDI_VAN_Identify_TP_based_on_
ISA_GS_ID.pdf
I did uncomment the following line
#oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.edi.identifyFromTP = Interchange | Group | Exchange
from tip.properties
But when I put a file 810 EDI file "test_canon810_11i.dat" for B2B pickup B2B errors with
"Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME] "test", To party[NAME] "IKON", Business action name "810_inbound_p"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate"
But if I just rename the file to "CANON_810_11i.dat" B2B successfully processes the file.
I have setup trading partners IKON and CANON with appropriate edi interchange id but not sure why B2B is erroring in previous case and in the latter case why is it trying to identify the trading partner by filename (even though the tip.properties has been updated as mentioned earlier)
Let me know if you have any pointers in fixing above
Thanks
Sachin Sutar

Hi Sachin,
If you want to use the Interchange Sender/Receiver ID for identification, please set
oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.edi.identifyFromTP=Interchange in the tip.properties. Uncomment the #oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.edi.identifyFromTP = Interchange | Group | Exchange would not work.
As a result, the B2B Server defaults to identifying the Trading Partner base on the file name. You can see from the b2b.log that the From party[NAME] = test or CANON. That's because we use the first portion of the file name as the TP name.
Hope this helps,
Eng

Issue with trading partner

Hi ,
I have a issue with trading partner,
While clearing the bank clearing account with bank main account user has got the below error
"Consolidated companies ' ' are different"
The issue is because u201CTrading Partneru201D, document number xxxx has the trading partner.
I have given the below solution to client,
Proposed solution:
Reverse the payment & invoice documents
Edit the vendor master data (Remove the trading partner from vendor master data)
Re-post the invoice
Do the payment document
Now client does not want to revere the document, do we have any other way to do this?
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi Sridhar,
if you make wrong entry in VBUND, it is necessary to REVERSE the document first and re-post with the correct VBUND information. BSEG-VBUND is one of the important organizational fields which should be managed in the same manner as company code, business area etc. These organizational fields cannot/should not be changed.
Please refer to note 4152, which provides valuable information on why
the error F5080 arises in your system.
Also please consider the following points:
There is also another note, 109925, which describes in detail the
possibility to transfer, into all the line items, the trading partner.
Use
o If you want the trading partner to be transferred to all line items,
do NOT set this indicator.
The System behaviour is the following one:
1) Both indicators switched OFF:
If a trading partner is maintained in G/L, vendor or customer master
record, VBUND is copied to all document lines. VBUND is unique
in FI-document.
2) Indicator "Multiple companies" switched ON and indicator
"Enter trading partner" switched OFF:
The company ID (= trading partner) is not inherited to other items for
document types that allow cross-company postings.
3) Indicator "Multiple companies" switched ON and indicator
"Enter trading partner" switched ON:
You can enter a trading partner when posting to a G/L account and in
the G/L master record, no trading partner is stored.
In this case, the company ID specified manually is entered in all
line items that not yet received a company code from the customer
or vendor master record.
Kind Regards,
Mateus

Unable to update Partner Unit in Eccs with Trading Partner from FI

Hi,
I had removed the Breakdown category from the FS item Master (CX14) for a reco Acct by mistake .Now when i update the master table in CX14 with the same Break down Category(0110 - Partner Unit (break down Type-4) + Translation Currency (break down type -2)) the sytem than gives a pop up window showing the "Report for Transaction Check" where it asks for the Default Value of Partner Unit to be entered.Once i maintain the default value of partner unit all the document for the reco account gets updated with default Partner unit.However in FI module each of the documents posted for this account have diffrent Trading Partner due to which im unable to do the Interunit Elimination.
Kindly let me know how do i update Partner unit in all the documents in Consolidation with the trading Partner from FI module.
thanks
Karan

Once i maintain the default value of partner unit all the document for the reco account gets updated
this system behavior makes sense as you are trying to change configuration after loading transaction data. what happens if you go back to the underlying accounts and change TP back to what FI is showing? if u have to deal with a lot of documents u may want to set up a BDC session to do the mass update.

Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

Hi experts,
We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
Thank you,
Michal

Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
Regards
Sharabh

Painter doesn't work with Trading Partner's Business Area COSP-PARGB

Hello,
i valorized field PARGB through FI substitution (Tcode GGB1) and it works fine.
PARGB is valorized in BSEG, COEP and COSP for CO totals records for reporting.
In GR22 i activated PARGB in Characteristics screen for Library 6O1 (internal orders).
I created a report copying standard report 6O01-001 and i put in General Data Selection field PARGB.
The selection screen doesn't work!
The field appears and F1 functionality calls COSP-PARGB and it's correct.
I tried to use fix values rather than variables (standard or custom), but the extraction doesn't work.
The system doesn't filter by Trading partner's Business Area.
Please, does anybody know something in matter?
Thanks,
Regards
Enrico

Hi Sanjit,
I tried to find what you said, but no success.
I made it work in other site, but in my own it doesn't work :S
I'm adding to receive mails in [email protected]
and here goes the site www.meanwhileeverywhere.com
I'll be glad if you help find this missing thing.
Thx!
Johnny Macedo
2014-03-13 14:34 GMT-03:00 Sanjit_Das <[email protected]>:
Re: Muse contact form doesn't work properly with external email
provider created by Sanjit_Das<http://forums.adobe.com/people/Sanjit_Das>in *Help
with using Adobe Muse CC* - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/6206807#6206807

Batch-Input/CALL TRANSACTION FB01: Trading Partner cannot be filled in

Dear experts,
I have the following problem with performing an FB01 booking on the basis of
CALL TRANSACTION USING:
In the customizing of the FI document type you can mark several fields that
are supposed to appear when you perform an FB01 posting, among them
the "Trading partner". But this field only seems to show in Non-BTCI-mode.
There are SAP Notes treating the phenomenon of the additional COBL-data
screen being always brought up with all available fields in BTCI mode
(which is fine for me, since I actually want to fill in some fields there, too),
but this screen does not contain the trading partner and I can't find any hint
why fields like BSEG-VBUND (trading partner) apparently cannot be reached
at all in BTCI-Mode.
Does anybody know this problem, or better yet: have a solution ?
Thanks in advance
Andreas

Hello Akanksha,
I suppose you're interested in how you make the fields available/visible
in the posting transactions ?
BSEG-VBUND/Trading partner for instance belongs to the
supposed-to-be-available checkbox-selection in customizing of the
document type you are going to use for your posting.
The availability of the additional controlling fields (cost center, order no. etc.)
depends on the cost accounting being active and on the field status group
that is chosen for your account.
In the booking/posting transactions you reach the fields with the button
"further data".
Best regards
Andreas

Cycle of pca with trading partner

Dear experts,
Is it possible to create a pca cycle of some pcas with a specific trading partner?.....i couldn´t find this field on the senderside....
what i need is to create a cycle with specific pcas and also a specifc trading partner........any tips?
Thank oyu in advance,
Leandro.

Hello Leandro,
you have to activate the field RASSC (Trading Partner) in trx. GCA6 when you use distribution and trx. GCA1 for allocations.
In case you use classic PCA the following entry has to be specified in trx. GCA6:
GLPCT Distribution Actual RASSC Trading Partner
Double click on this entry.
As you want to use the field as Sender criteria, you have to set the Control flag to X and activate Single value, Interval, Set.
When you afterwards change the cycle or create a new cycle the field Trading Partner will be available as sender criteria.
Cheers,
Daniela

Inter business area transactions and trading partner business area

Hi Gurus,
We are on R3 4.7. *We have more than one business area but only one company code*.. We do pull financial statements by business area.
One of the business area A gets a service contract to do work. Some part of the work is outsourced from business area A to business Area B. Business Area A pays to business Area B for the services done by business area B.
While doing payment to the business area B, do we need to populate trading partner busiess area as business area A? Is this trading partner busiess area mandatory to be populated in this type of scenario.
Are there any things we need to be aware of when they are inter business area transactions as described in the above scenario.
We are not implementing EC-CS/any other consolidation solution.
Thanks,
Edited by: James09 on Jul 11, 2011 7:41 PM

If no consolidation system is implemeneted, then the partner business area is not mandatory. However it may be helpful for analysis as well as any future consolidations that may be necessary. Therefore it is suggested that this be captured, and in many cases will automatically be populated.

Invalid breakdown of Item 13001 by Trading partner: Initializing the value

Hi,
There are some transaction with trading partner information. These transaction are not for interunit elimination ( i just want to update to BCS infocube) . I am using the breakdown type 1 (Optional breakdown, initialized value allowed). And i am not assigning breakdown type 1 to FS item 13001.
When i was trying to load data, i get warning message stated " invalid breakdown of item 13001 by trading partner: Initializing the value".
Please advise. Many Thanks
Regards, Renee

Renee,
There is a controversion between your 1st & 2nd post:

I am using the breakdown type 1 (Optional breakdown, initialized value allowed). And i am not assigning breakdown type 1 to FS item 13001.

I am using the breakdown type 1 (Optional breakdown, initialized value allowed)

Does it mean that you have in your system the discussed breakdown, but don't assign it to FS item 13001?
If yes, then, what breakdown you assign to FS item 13001?

R/3 Report for trading partner transactions

Hi
I posted intercompany transaction (using trading partner). I need to know if there is any tcode for R/3 report which will show transactions with trading partners. I require for AR AP GL transactions.
I came to know that there is some tcode which will show transaction of one trading partner in another books and vice versa. I checked into information system. But i didn't got.

Hi,
For reconciling associated companies, you can access these from the SAP application menu as follows:
SAP menu -> Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable or Accounts Payable -> Periodic Processing -> Closing -> Check/Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
These programs provide more functions and flexibility, and they enable you to reconcile data across different systems.
You carry out the Customizing for these programs in the SAP Customizing Guide under:
SPRO> Financial Accounting or Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Accounting -> Business Transactions -> Closing -> Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
Regards,
Gaurav

Inventory Report with Trading Partners & Cost of Sales

Hi Freinds,
We have activated the Trading Partners in the document types relating to the Invoice Verification and Goods Receipts. Accordingly when we do the GR or the Invoice Verification, the Trading Partner information gets picked up at the time of the transaction.
We now want to generate the Inventory Report based on the Trading Partner and also the Cost of Sales, relating to the Inventories bought from affiliated companies, where we have assigned the Trading Partners. How can we do that?
Your help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
Regards

Hi
Trading partner update - this is happening in FI only, so i hope it is not possible to get the inventory report based on trading partner wise.
Only possible thing is go for ABAP report using the BSAK / BSIK / RSEG / EKKO / EKPE / EKBE
VVR

Trading partner receiving two same transactions

Hi B2B Gurus,
Our scenario is Division people place the flat files to FTP folder, SOA picks the flat files from FTP and it transforms to EDI XML file and then it place the EDI XML to IP_OUT_QUEUE, B2B picks up the file and it transforms to native EDI and sends it to trading partner.
But here issue is we are sending a single transaction to trading partner and they are receiving the same payload with different filename
Ex: The file named - Penske_860_20110629_172354282965_20110629_132412042.dat (Interchange # 282965)
Contains the same data as - emerson860_pp_out.110629132506.17334
The file named - Penske_860_20110629_183428283017_20110629_143441592.dat (Interchange # 283017)
Contains the same data as - emerson860_pp_out.110629143618.29885
Could any one help us how to cross chek this and wat are the chances for this ...
Regards
Sam

Hi Anuj,
Is it that same TP is receiving one transaction twice or same transaction is being passed to two TP's
ans:same TP is receiving one transaction twice with different filename with same payload.
We are using 10G B2B.
We are sending one transaction to tradaing partner and trading partner receving the same transactions twice with different file name and same payload.
Anuj, I cross check the filename in the log file, i am able to find only one file name in it. (Penske_850)
Is it possible that we sent one file and they are duplicating on theire side?
Regardds
sam

SAP Standard Report: Trial balance that include trading partner

Good Morning Guru's-
To avoid creating a custom report, does anyone know of a standard SAP report trial balance that includes trading partner?
Thank you.
Points will be awarded promptly!

Hi
You can use Trading partner in the selection screen but not in the output in standard reports
If you populate Trading partner in the dynamic selection, output you will get only specific to that trading partner
Reg
Vishnu

Any report or Table to see orders with BP partner functions in SAP CRM?

Hello All,
Could anyone help me in getting the table or any report for orders with BP partner functions in SAP CRM?
Would appreciate replying at the earliest.
Cheers
Sreedhar

Hello Bruno,
Thanks very much.
It is somehow helpful for my need but not completly. This is ok when the orders are less in number.
My requirement is how to check the first name , last name and number for contact persons in a list of CRM orders(simply who is the contact person for a list of orders).Let me know for any additional info.
I would apprecaite if you could help me in getting any other way.
Cheers
Sreedhar
Edited by: sreedharhazari2 on Jun 8, 2010 9:18 AM

R/3 report of transactions with trading partner

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for