Issue with trading partner

Hi ,
I have a issue with trading partner,
While clearing the bank clearing account with bank main account user has got the below error
"Consolidated companies ' ' are different"
The issue is because u201CTrading Partneru201D, document number xxxx has the trading partner.
I have given the below solution to client,
Proposed solution:
Reverse the payment & invoice documents
Edit the vendor master data (Remove the trading partner from vendor master data)
Re-post the invoice
Do the payment document
Now client does not want to revere the document, do we have any other way to do this?
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi Sridhar,
if you make wrong entry in VBUND, it is necessary to REVERSE the document first and re-post with the correct VBUND information.  BSEG-VBUND is one of the important organizational fields which should be managed in the same manner as company code, business area etc. These organizational fields cannot/should not be changed.
Please refer to note 4152, which provides valuable information on why
the error F5080 arises in your system.
Also please consider the following points:
There is also another note, 109925, which describes in detail the
possibility to transfer, into all the line items, the trading partner.
Use
o  If you want the trading partner to be transferred to all line items,
    do NOT set this indicator.
The System behaviour is the following one:
1) Both indicators switched OFF:
If a trading partner is maintained in G/L, vendor or customer master
record, VBUND is copied to all document lines. VBUND is unique
in FI-document.
2) Indicator "Multiple companies" switched ON and indicator
"Enter trading partner" switched OFF:
The company ID (= trading partner) is not inherited to other items for
document types that allow cross-company postings.
3) Indicator "Multiple companies" switched ON and indicator
"Enter trading partner" switched ON:
You can enter a trading partner when posting to a G/L account and in
the G/L master record, no trading partner is stored.
In this case, the company ID specified manually is entered in all
line items that not yet received a company code from the customer
or vendor master record.
Kind Regards,
Mateus

Similar Messages

  • Issue with Trading Partner Identification - Files are not picked

    Hi,
    As per user guide and also the following note
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/integration/b2b/pdf/B2B_TN_013_EDI_VAN_Identify_TP_based_on_
    ISA_GS_ID.pdf
    I did uncomment the following line
    #oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.edi.identifyFromTP = Interchange | Group | Exchange
    from tip.properties
    But when I put a file 810 EDI file "test_canon810_11i.dat" for B2B pickup B2B errors with
    "Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME] "test", To party[NAME] "IKON", Business action name "810_inbound_p"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate"
    But if I just rename the file to "CANON_810_11i.dat" B2B successfully processes the file.
    I have setup trading partners IKON and CANON with appropriate edi interchange id but not sure why B2B is erroring in previous case and in the latter case why is it trying to identify the trading partner by filename (even though the tip.properties has been updated as mentioned earlier)
    Let me know if you have any pointers in fixing above
    Thanks
    Sachin Sutar

    Hi Sachin,
    If you want to use the Interchange Sender/Receiver ID for identification, please set
    oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.edi.identifyFromTP=Interchange in the tip.properties. Uncomment the #oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.edi.identifyFromTP = Interchange | Group | Exchange would not work.
    As a result, the B2B Server defaults to identifying the Trading Partner base on the file name. You can see from the b2b.log that the From party[NAME] = test or CANON. That's because we use the first portion of the file name as the TP name.
    Hope this helps,
    Eng

  • Unable to update Partner Unit in Eccs with Trading Partner from FI

    Hi,
    I had removed the Breakdown category from the FS item Master (CX14) for a reco Acct by mistake .Now when i update the master table in CX14 with the same Break down Category(0110 - Partner Unit (break down Type-4) + Translation Currency (break down type -2)) the sytem than gives a pop up window showing the "Report for Transaction Check" where it asks for the Default Value of Partner Unit to be entered.Once i maintain the default value of partner unit all the document for the reco account gets updated with default Partner unit.However in FI module each of the documents posted for this account have diffrent Trading Partner due to which im unable to do the Interunit Elimination.
    Kindly let me know how do i update Partner unit in all the documents in Consolidation with the trading Partner from FI module.
    thanks
    Karan

    Once i maintain the default value of partner unit all the document for the reco account gets updated
    this system behavior makes sense as you are trying to change configuration after loading transaction data. what happens if you go back to the underlying accounts and change TP back to what FI is showing? if u have to deal with a lot of documents u may want to set up a BDC session to do the mass update.

  • Cycle of pca with trading partner

    Dear experts,
    Is it possible to create a pca cycle of some pcas with a specific trading partner?.....i couldn´t find this field on the senderside....
    what i need is to create a cycle with specific pcas and also a specifc trading partner........any tips?
    Thank oyu in advance,
    Leandro.

    Hello Leandro,
    you have to activate the field RASSC (Trading Partner) in trx. GCA6 when you use distribution and trx. GCA1 for allocations.
    In case you use classic PCA the following entry has to be specified in trx. GCA6:
    GLPCT     Distribution     Actual     RASSC     Trading Partner
    Double click on this entry.
    As you want to use the field as Sender criteria, you have to set the Control flag to X and activate Single value, Interval, Set.
    When you afterwards change the cycle or create a new cycle the field Trading Partner will be available as sender criteria.
    Cheers,
    Daniela

  • R/3 report of transactions with trading partner

    Hi
    I posted intercompany transaction (using trading partner). I need to know if there is any tcode for R/3 report which will show transactions with trading partners. I require for AR AP GL transactions.
    I came to know that there is some tcode which will show transaction of one trading partner in another books and vice versa. I checked into information system. But i didn't got.
    Please let me know

    Hi,
    For reconciling associated companies, you can access these from the SAP application menu as follows:
    SAP menu -> Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable or Accounts Payable -> Periodic Processing -> Closing -> Check/Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
    These programs provide more functions and flexibility, and they enable you to reconcile data across different systems.
    You carry out the Customizing for these programs in the SAP Customizing Guide under:
    SPRO> Financial Accounting or Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Accounting -> Business Transactions -> Closing -> Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

    Hi experts,
    We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
    Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
    Thank you,
    Michal

    Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
    That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
    In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
    Regards
    Sharabh

  • Painter doesn't work with Trading Partner's Business Area COSP-PARGB

    Hello,
    i valorized field PARGB through FI substitution (Tcode GGB1) and it works fine.
    PARGB is valorized in BSEG, COEP and COSP for CO totals records for reporting.
    In GR22 i activated PARGB in Characteristics screen for Library 6O1 (internal orders).
    I created a report copying standard report 6O01-001 and i put in General Data Selection field PARGB.
    The selection screen doesn't work!
    The field appears and F1 functionality calls COSP-PARGB and it's correct.
    I tried to use fix values rather than variables (standard or custom), but the extraction doesn't work.
    The system doesn't filter by Trading partner's Business Area.
    Please, does anybody know something in matter?
    Thanks,
    Regards
    Enrico

    Hi Sanjit,
    I tried to find what you said, but no success.
    I made it work in other site, but in my own it doesn't work :S
    I'm adding to receive mails in [email protected]
    and here goes the site www.meanwhileeverywhere.com
    I'll be glad if you help find this missing thing.
    Thx!
    Johnny Macedo
    2014-03-13 14:34 GMT-03:00 Sanjit_Das <[email protected]>:
        Re: Muse contact form doesn't work properly with external email
    provider  created by Sanjit_Das<http://forums.adobe.com/people/Sanjit_Das>in *Help
    with using Adobe Muse CC* - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/6206807#6206807

  • Issue with Business Partner in SRM

    Hi Experts,
    we are sending Business partner data from one client to another client in SRM.
    In the target client for the tab "Control" in the Business Hours,when I click on the calling hours button we are getting an warning message "Assignment of appointment rules to rule ID incorrect"
    we are sending the data related to business hours thru database tables CRMM_BUT_FRG0060 and CRMM_BUT_FRG0061.
    Can any provide me with a solution?
    Regards
    DK

    Hi
    This issue was resolved by SAP by applying some OSS notes.
    Regards,
    Ashish

  • Major DNS issue with my Partner Site PLEASE HELP...

    As a a business catalyst partner my partner site is completely down and all my corporate emails have been erased.  I built a new partner site using a business catalyst template and when I uploaded the new site to my partner site there were major conflicts with the default site-wide template and the files that I am unable to erase via FTP on the partner portal so the new template never fully worked. 
    So I moved on to Plan B - which was to open a new site as a "customer" under my own business catalyst account.  Uploaded the files and the site worked, now when I tried to take my partner account domain name and transfer it to my newly created customer account I ran into a second even larger issue.  It tells me the domain name already exists (as my partner domain) - please delete all files and try again (see screen shot for details.).
    It will not allow me to erase the partner account under my partner portal as the "Delete Site" feature is not there for my partner portal (see screenshots for example).
    Please help me straighten out this mess as my business site is completely down and all my corporate emails have been completely erased. 

    I actually had the exact same problem. If you are a premium partner and rebranded unfotunately the domain name can't be moved because your customer sites are tied to that domain name.
    So the only option is to create a new domain for your site. It sucks I know, but I can see why it has to be that way.
    If you have not rebranded, then contacting support might be able to change that for you.

  • Modified an EDI 940 process, GS01 does not fill with OW in fact is blank. Causes issues with the partner.

    I consolidated a 940 process that was sendind flat file/edi/xml/sql server to run all from one orchestration and dynamic send ports (some are send to the file system and some to ftp). Before everything was working perfect, with the changes everything also
    appeared   to be perfect and off it went into production. I am know seeing that the SG01 is not being set for EDI messages, I had nothing specific before it looked that everything was being set from the party envelope information. I added the
    OW there just to see if it would show up, but nothing. I added a line in the message construction shape when the transformation takes place msg(EDI.GS01) = "OW"; I have re-started the instance after deploying and nothing.
    Any pointers as to were to look would be very helpful.
    Regards
    Bico 
    Bico Bielich

    Thanks, tried the override but nothing changed:
    SCN940EDISndMsg(EDI.DestinationPartyName) = varPartyName;
    //SCN940EDISndMsg(EDI.GS01) = "OW";
    //SCN940EDISndMsg(EDI.GS02) = "8183483700";
    SCN940EDISndMsg(EdiOverride.GS01) = "OW";
    was testing changing  　GS02 and that worked fine, is just GS01 ....
    Bico Bielich

  • Unable to clear customer due to error: u201CPlease enter valid trading partner:

    Hi team
    i am getting this error in clearing in customer invoice
    i checked out in customer master trading partner no is there :*****
    and that customer is also a Vendor but in vendor master record that trading partner no is not there
    but customer number is there
    i need to clear against a incoming payment AB doc type with some billing document
    its a bank charges i need to pay ...
    i am useing transaction code f-32
    if you need any inputs please do let me know
    Moderator message -personal information removed
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Sep 9, 2011 9:14 AM

    Hi,
    seems like you have to reverse the document without trading partner and re-post with Trading partner. Then it should work. If this is automatic postings and more often to happen in future think about pre-setting it in GL accoutn if possible or validations/ substiutions.
    Regards
    Hein

  • ACC GL Posting idoc requires trading partner

    Hello all,
    I have created a new interface, which posts an ACC_GL_POSTING Idoc to SAP.
    However this idoc runs into error as follows:
    CLIA: Line item 000 - G/L account 5590041 has to be posted with trading partner.
    I know which trading partner this account has to be posted with. However this partner is used for multiple company codes.
    The document type is ZA. When I look in OBA7 the "Inter-company postings" checkbox is not ticked. The "Enter trading partner" checkbox is ticked.
    Do you have any tips for me? Are there some specific settings I should check? What options do I have to get this Idoc processed succesfully automatically?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    - Mike

    Hello Gaurav,
    Thanks for your fast response.
    I haven't defaulted the trading partner as the trading partner can vary for the same GL Account.
    I am trying to get GL Postings processed using the ACC_GL_POSTING idoc type. However I was wondering whether there is a way to avoid entering the trading partner manually. Or how it is possible to enter the trading partner manually when trying to use idoc processing.
    - Mike

  • Invalid breakdown of Item 13001 by Trading partner: Initializing the value

    Hi,
    There are some transaction with trading partner information. These transaction are not for interunit elimination ( i just want to update to BCS infocube) . I am using the breakdown type 1 (Optional breakdown, initialized value allowed). And i am not assigning breakdown type 1 to FS item 13001.
    When i was trying to load data, i get warning message stated " invalid breakdown of item 13001 by trading partner: Initializing the value".
    Please advise. Many Thanks
    Regards, Renee

    Renee,
    There is a controversion between your 1st & 2nd post:
    <i>
    I am <b>using</b> the breakdown type 1 (Optional breakdown, initialized value allowed). And i am <b>not assigning</b> breakdown type 1 to FS item 13001.
    </i>
    <i>I am <b>using </b>the breakdown type 1 (Optional breakdown, initialized value allowed)
    </i>
    Does it mean that you have in your system the discussed breakdown, but don't assign it to FS item 13001?
    If yes, then, what breakdown you assign to FS item 13001?

  • Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled

    Hi
    The user had some old documents and he is trying to clear them.
    During clearing he is facing an error "Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled"
    Trading partner field is blank in the reconciliation account 12221001 and also customer account.
    BSEG of the document which gives the problem. The reconciliation account is 12221001, the trading partner for the customer line is not filled in.
    How can we fill the trading partner on this line item?
    Thanks in Advance,
    Deepthi.

    hi,
    trading partner field is populated from account , customer or vendor.
    if your customer wants to clear old documents, most probably, some documents are filled with trading partner field and others are not.
    in this situation you cannot clear these documents.
    i have faced the same iproblem. to solve it, you should determine the balance of trading partner included documents,
    you should post two documents using a dummy document.
    lets say the balance is 20.000 usd
    you should post: (initially you should maintain trading partner field in customer data)
    DR/CR    customer.........20.000usd
    CR/DR  dummy acc. ..........20.000 usd
    second posting ( you should clear the trading partner field in customer data)
    CR/DR custoemr......20.0000usd
    DR/CR dummy acc.....20.000 usd
    now you can clear items with trading partner is filled.

  • Trading partner is not populated on G/L accounts

    Dear All,
    We have activated trading partners.
    When the SD document is posted only customer account documents are getting populated with "trading partner".
    However - "trading partner" is not copied to G/L account.(revenue accounts, cost of goods sold).
    Is there any standard SAP solution to solve this?
    Best regards,
    Mark

    No this will not have influence on other areas which are not inter-company. But if you want the system to default the trading partner from one line to all other lines in a document with trading partner, then you have to de-activate this switch.
    And if you have a scenario when you are posting to more than one trading partners within a single document, then you shouldn't use this document type. You should use then document type with the Inter-co switch on and system will expect you to manually inter the trading partners in the off-set G/L accounts. This inter-co switch is a little misnomer.
    I have refreshed my log-in, you can try the point assignments now.
    Thanks
    Ron

Maybe you are looking for