"R" and "N" inconsistency

"R" will move you from both Library and Develop module into the "crop mode," which I nickname
"Rotation" for easy association with the shortcut. You automatically land in Develop module, repeat "R" and you will stay in "D" view of the develop module, thus there is no memory of the previous mode. You can use "R" in both Grid view "G", and lupe view "E" (which I nickname
"Enlarge" for association.)
Not so with the "N" heal and speckle removal tool. If you are in the "D" view, "N" will bring you in and out the heal tool and keep in the "D" view. However in the "G" or "E", "N" does something else, what I still have not discovered what is it precisely. Image will be enlarged, like in the "E" mode, but shown in a white think frame and with a [X] icon on the right bottom. I suspect, its the Survey Mode, but I might be wrong, the more that it is really difficult to associate N with "survey."
I believe that this is a bug in design. All tools and their shortcuts should behave identical.

They are modal short cuts, so what seems like inconsistency is a deliberate thing.
Survey Mode is a sort of Lightbox
Richard Earney
http://inside-lightroom.com

Similar Messages

Tables TCURM and T001K inconsistent Error While Creating Materials by BAPI

Hi I am Using the BAPI
BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA to create Material Masters I am creating all views for a Material.
When I repeatedly run the BAPI for Multiple runs to create the Materials for Multiple plants and multple sales Views
I get an Error Message when it is tryng to create accounting and costing View
The error is Tables
TCURM and T001K inconsistent; notify your systems administrator
I dont get this message if I create one Material.
I get this error message only when I repeat the loop and try to create Materials for different valvation areas..
Please some one give ur views ..
I promise All replies will be rewarded..
Thanks
Martin

Rob,
This is the peculiar behavious of SAP.
As i am trying to create the materials by using the BAPI with in Visual Basic.
The error can be simulated by using online data entry
i did a research on it and i found that the error can be overcome if we create the accouting view first and later oher views and this occurs if we try to create accouting views for other valuation areas are plants when we set the MRP_VIEW = "X" and ACCOUNT_VIEW = "X" and COST_VIEW = "X"
i dont know the exact reason for all this...
Thanks
Martin

IPhoto books too light and/or inconsistent???

Hello, Has anyone figured out if the general consensus is that the iphoto books are printing light? An order of 30 medium softcover came out light and also inconsistent from book to book. The hardcover seemed not too light and looked better.
What are others experience, as I would like to try a fix and make all the photos slightly darker and perhaps a bit more saturated....
Any thoughts??
THANKS!

I too have had this problem. I have ordered about 10 large books in the past and the photos were vivid and really looked pretty good. But the ones I received about 2 weeks ago were grainy and the images were really washed out. Funny thing is that I also ordered some single prints of the same pics used in the album and they are gorgeous and clear (very saturated!!). I realize the printing process is different with the books vs. the prints, but this was a tremendous difference. I did email support and they refunded me my $90.00 within 3 days of my email with no questions asked.
I have been reading a lot of these posts with a lot of suggestions for "tweaking" preferences, etc., but I'm convinced that there is a problem with the Apple printing or the software upgrades because I have not changed my equipment - the only thing that has changed is the version of iphoto I'm using. There is no other explanation for having 10 books look great and the newest ones looking so bad! I really like having the books and I hope Apple will resolve this soon.
So as to your question about making the photos slightly darker.........well, you still run the risk of receiving another bad book.
Powerbook Mac OS X (10.3.9)

OKC_K_HEADERS_B and OKS_K_HEADERS_B inconsistency

Hi,
I have an inconsistency between these two tables, because when I run this query the record is shown:
SELECT *
FROM OKC_K_HEADERS_B CHRB
,OKC_K_HEADERS_TL CHRT
-- ,OKS_K_HEADERS_B KHR
,OKC_STATUSES_V STS
,OKC_SUBCLASSES_V CLS
WHERE CHRB.ID = CHRT.ID
-- AND CHRB.ID = KHR.CHR_ID
and CHRT.LANGUAGE = USERENV('LANG')
AND CHRB.STS_CODE = STS.CODE
AND CHRB.SCS_CODE = CLS.CODE
AND CLS.CLS_CODE = 'SERVICE'
and CHRB.ID =1098295
instead, if I remove the comments the record disappears. I found the register in OKC table but it's lost in the OKS table.
Can anyone help me for solve this problem? How can I fix the data? It's possible to find the orphan record in the OKS table?
I talked with users and they tell me that the problem occurs at the end or expiration of the contract, this is a bug in a standard function or due to a custom, I don't know?
Thanks in advance,
Fadel

Please see (What Is Difference Between OKC_K_HEADERS_B And OKC_K_HEADERS_ALL_B, And How Query From Synonym OKC_K_HEADERS_B In R12? [ID 1164803.1]).
Thanks,
Hussein

Lightroom, 5.5, Mac version: lens metadata incomplete and/or inconsistent. Photos taken with the same camera and lens display the lens metadata differently in LR 5.5, but are the same in the original files

LR is putting different descriptions of the same lens, used with the same camera, in the metadata of photos taken on the same occasion.
For example:
The following two images were taken with the same camera and lens.
They were imported at the same time into LR by copying.
The only difference in treatment is that the first was an untouched out-of camera jpeg, the second had been flipped using Preview on the Mac.
The one that was flipped has a full description of the lens, the one that was untouched has an abbreviated description.
When you show the file in the Finder and read the metadata using Preview, the correct full lens description appears.
Why is LR displaying the metadata differently for these two files?

Can you zip up a few of your GoPro images, upload them to dropbox.com and post a share link, here, so others can experiment with them, or do you mean this issue is global to all camera models?

WRT300N and laptop inconsistent connectivity

Once of twice a day I boot up my laptop and find that it has lost connectivity to the WRT300N. I'm usually able to restore it by pushing the reset button or fiddling with the software (I'm never quite sure what it is that I do that restores the connection successfully).
I have security enabled and when it works, it works great. What should I be looking for in order to make the connection more stable?
Thanks,
Nic

It seems that router setup page is not loading 100% .....
Disable firewall & antivirus software ....
Click start >> control panel >> Internet option >> Under ganeral .... click delete cookies & files .... click clear history .... click OK ....
Try opening once again the setup page....
If it still shows the same kind of page ....try upgrading of router firmware ...

Delete transaction in SNP and data inconsistency in product view

Hi,
After i run the SNP heuristics,system is creating PurRequisition say in DC 1500 sourcing from 1510. But in the product view of 1510 location,there is no PurReqRel is visible.This is happening for some products. And also when i use Delete transaction, /SAPAPO/RLCDEL - Delete Transaction Data , i am getting the messages orders are deleted. But when i look in product view,orders are not deleted. This issue is for all the products. we are using SCM5.0. I have run all the consistency checks like OM17,time series check etc. Any one got the same issue?
Any suggestions?
Thanks & Regards
Akthar
Edited by: Aktar Ahmed Shaik on Nov 17, 2009 3:51 PM

Hi Akthar,
Please raise this question in SCM-APO Forum as i hope there is no problm in R/3.
Regards
Suri

Frustrated with Verizon and their inconsistent Customer Service

I am so frustrated with Verizon and their Customer Care/Service. I have never been told so many different things. It seems that there is no consistency with what they tell customers. I called and explained to them that I have been with them for over 20 years that we were looking to save on our monthly bill. They said that with my employee discount, and they checked to see if I qualified for other discounts, I didn't and they lady could have cared less to help. My Verizon/employee discount is changing (decreasing in percentage saved), Sprint and AT&T offer a higher discount with my employer. I spoke to Sprint and AT&T and they offer not only better discount, they are cheaper (and AT&T coverage is better here where I live, versus very broken up where I live when it comes to Verizon). Anyway, I called back and spoke to a Rep. named Kayla who was more than happy to keep us at Verizon. I questioned the Edge plan, and that none of our 5 lines where up to where I could get it. I asked her if she could speak to someone and make an exception. She did and said that was not a problem that since we had been loyal customers for over 20 years, I could do the Early Edge on all 5 lines, that she could go ahead and place an order for 5 new phones of what we wanted - and that when I received them, then I would have to send Verizon back the 5 phones that we currently have. I thought great. I'd be saving atleast some money going this route. I told her that I wasn't sure which phones we wanted that I would find out and call back. I did the online chat later because I had a question, and that Rep told me - No, that wasn't going be happening at all that I was misinformed. This is not the first time that this has happened with Verizon. A rep in a store told me if I bought this Verizon tablet ($99 with a $99 mail in rebate - Free, I liked that - then he said if I did that, he could save us $20 per month on what we were currently paying per month). Well, low and behold - I got an extra line - a tablet that I had no use for (he got me at the whole "I'll lower your bill $20 per month". I fell for it, and it didn't save me one penny. In the meantime, I put Sprint and AT&T to the test - I spoke with each of them about 3 different times each and got the same answer each time from both of the providers. Customer Care/Service and consistency and not misleading customers is what is selling me. I will gladly spend my $3,400/year elsewhere - and save money in the process. Anyone else have similar experiences???

Early Edge works by having you turn in the phone on the line that is early edge upgraded. You then start paying for the full cost of that phone over 24 months, sooner once you get to 75% paid off on that phone, where you can trade it in and start again on another phone, but you will have lost the money already paid up to 75%. When you trade in the phone for Early Edge and then trade in the new phone for edging up, the phones must be in perfect working order with no damage of any kind.
The money "saved" comes from being on Edge where, if the phone is on a plan with 6GB or more data, you save $25 per month on each Edge phone, $15 if on a plan with less than 6GB. However, you turn around and put that $25 back onto the phone payment each month, so you DO save $25/$15 but you basically break about even on a 6GB and greater plan after the phone cost.
BUT, in the end, if you get a better, more reliable signal from ATT, and you have an awful signal with VZW, you might consider a switch, but you'd have a large sum of ETFs at this point to cancel all 5 lines. There are also special stipulations as to who and when one can Edge up or start Early Edge, such as 6 months straight on-time payments.
Verizon Edge FAQs | Verizon Wireless
Early Edge is basically just starting the Edge plan early, so the above page should answer a lot of the questions regarding eligibility. Be warned however, that there are a lot of people with issues who decided to take advantage of this program, namely the trade-in process of sending old phones back and then finding charges on their bill for phones that were "not" received at the warehouse.
It is my opinion that you should not go this route, because if you have less than stellar service now, you are setting yourself up for possible frustration and another 2 years of disappointment.

Why are google and youtube inconsistent with encrypted transmission of pages?

Typically I get the padlock icon when I am on a google or youtube page but sometimes -- particularly recently -- I get the exclamation point with the further message that "the connection to this website is not fully secure because it contains unencrypted elements (such as images)." However, invariably when I refresh the page the padlock icon instead of the exclamation point appears. I don't understand why this happens since nothing otherwise on the page appears to have changed, and yet the refresh switches it from the exclamation point to the padlock icon. I'd appreciate any insight that someone can offer.

Some pages may have rotating ads to insecure pages, so you may get other links if you refresh the page.
You can open the Web Console (Firefox/Tools > Web Developer) to check if there are (red) lines with [mixed]to see if that helps to identify the mixed content.

Help with JPCSC linux and windows inconsistency!

I created a smart card with a single EF file.
I set the access condition for reading/updating the said binary file to require a key.
In GSM 11.11 specs this means:
VERIFY_CHV must be sent first before READ_BINARY or UPDATE_BINARY. Otherwise, a '9804' response (access condition not fulfilled) is returned when performing READ_BINARY or UPDATE_BINARY.
When running my code in Windows (jpcsc.dll), it works as expected but when I run my code in linux (libjpcsc.so), it hangs. Why??
Here is an APDU trace:
In Windows:
CMD: A0A40000020001 - Select EF (0001)
RSP: 9F0F
CMD: A0B0000008 - Read Binary
RSP: 9804 - Access condition not fulfilled
CMD: A02000010831323334FFFFFFFF - Verify CHV
RSP: 9000
CMD: A0B0000008 - Read Binary
RSP: 41424344454647489000 - Data of EF successfully read
In Linux:
CMD: A0A40000020001 - Select EF (0001)
RSP: 9F0F
CMD: A0B0000008 - Read Binary
----HANGS----
I have tried jpcsc 0.8.0 and 0.7.5 with the same results. Help from the experts please!!
Thanks in advance.

any help please?

FTR_DEALPOS and TV35 inconsistent

I have post one spot transaction with 1000 USD (buy), sel 80000 JPY(sell), in FTR_dealpos, I can see the transaction, but in TV35, transaction and base currency:USD, evaluation type 0001, cuurency NPV=0, why TV35 is not showing figures?

Hello Prasad,
I've error TPM_TRL063 with transaction RTPM_TRDT_DATA_EXEC, the final repayment is just tested in other deal and the procedure management it's also correct. I've just inserted the initial ID security write down and negotiation spread using transaction TMP63A and TPM63B, at the end of TPM63 run the problem occurs: the position value in TPM63A are correctly managed by the systema (no error) the write down and negotiation spread are in error (TPM_TRL063).
Best Regards
Mario

Tables TCURM and T001W inconsistent; notify your systems administrator

Hi,
I'm getting the M3820 error while creating material master. I have assigned the plant to the valuation area but this still occurs.
Can anyone help?
Thank you!
Florian

Hi Florian
You can take part of SAP Note 3128 in this regard.
Hope this can help.
Thanks !

Date input and output inconsistent

Hi Friends,
I have two order confirmation comes out the date formate 01.06.2010 while I actually input 06/01/2010. This didn't happen before until recent two sales documents.
ADD: I also found all US sold-to customers remain date format as 00/00/0000 while other countries are00.00.0000
Where should I change.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Linda
Edited by: LindaSAP on Mar 9, 2010 5:18 PM

this is based on country settings made in IMG > sap Netweaver > general settings > setup countries > define countries
short: OY01

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

MacBook Pro Cost/Benefit to repair old, or sell and buy new?!

I have used a Apple MacBook Pro 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo (15.4-inch) for the past four years of college. In that time I've had it repaired once for some spillage, but other than that nothing has been done. The laptop has recently been showing serious age. I don't have a ton of extra cash, and was wondering if it would be smartest to A) Buy piecemeal repairs, and fix this one or B) sell/scrap this and purchase something new. I don't know the numbers enough to do a cost-benefit, so any help would gladly be appreciated!
INFO/BACKGROUND
Apple MacBook Pro 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo (15.4-inch) Bought in Summer 2006
• Track pad seems to be breaking/broken ($ fix cost?)
o Does not click appropriately
o Frequently messes up typing when barely touched
o Extremely finicky
• Screen sometimes displays lines of messy black lines in the middle of images with no rhyme or reason ($ fix cost?)
o What in the world could be causing the screen to display improperly in lines?
o Is this a video card failure?
o Is memory too low?
o Is it the logic board
• The battery is 100% dead and useless ($ fix cost?)
o Laptop must be plugged in to work
• Slow, and seemingly inconsistent performance ($ fix cost?)
o Memory/ram was never updated
o Safari has to be opened twice to work, first time it always just sits there
o Microsoft Office 03 applications run at a snails pace
• Still running original 2006 OS as well as all old OS applications ($ fix cost?)
• Case shows signs of use along edges with separation ($ fix cost?)
Also, if there are any ideas on what this would sell for, or a total cost to get it into solid running (and lasting!) shape would be awesome. I'm at wits end trying to budget for all this - thanks!

Hi r,
Without addressing the cost of each item, I can give you my opinion that it is time for an upgrade (new/er MBP). You'd basically be replacing the logic board, RAM, HD, battery, upper case, lower case, and possibly the display and keyboard. That's almost the entire machine. And you'd have to buy Snow Leopard, the latest OS. Then you'd be left with a set of "new" old hardware which should work fine for another couple of years, but you could instead be driving the latest/fastest model for not a lot more money, which should last well beyond what the old machine would last, thereby actually making it cheaper in the long run. Also factor in selling the old MBP on ebay or craigslist for parts, and that makes a new MBP even more cost effective.
Message was edited by: tjk

"R" and "N" inconsistency

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for