R3trans -d shows wrong SID for "SYSTEM"

We have cloned a DB SID-A to SID-B and configured a seperate listener "LISTENER_<SID-B>" for the 2. DB (SID-B will be upgraded soon).
Listener was started successfully. R3trans -d <SID-B> / R3trans -d is successfull and also SAP can be started, but in the trans.log I see still 1 occurence of old SID-A:
4 ETW000 Connected to DBMS = ORACLE --- dbs_ora_tnsname = 'SID-B' --- SYSTEM = 'SID-A'.
I can't see any "SID-A" ocurrences in the environment of orasid/sidadm and listener/tnsnames.ora, init<SID-B>.ora.
Table SAPUSER was newly created and is owned by OPS$<SID-B>ADM.
Any ideas ? Kind regards,
Uta

I found the solution:
After making some after-system-copy activities (SE06, etc.) the SYSTEM is displayed correctly:
4 ETW000 Connected to DBMS = ORACLE --- dbs_ora_tnsname = '<SID-B>' --- SYSTEM = '<SID-B>'.
Kind regards,
Uta

Similar Messages

"Invoice History Report "show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD

Invoice History Report show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD Currency
After I run this report i see in the last of this report there is difference between the supplier total
USD (Currency ) and the open Balance USD , it is decreased the open balance
for supplier with 2300 USD with out any reasons
bellow is some data copy of the report
======================================================
Supplier Site Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Site Total: USD 39,000.00
Supplier Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Total: USD 39,000.00
Open Balance: SAR 34,700.00
Open Balance: USD 36,700.00
*** End of Report ***
==============================================
please advise me from where can this differenc ( 39000 - 36,700=2300 )COMMING
or it is bug in this report , becuase i compare this report with other report in account payable like
-supplier open balance letter
-invoice register report
-invoice aging report
all this report give me the amount for supplier USD =39000
BUT AGIN FROM WHERE THE SYSTEM DECREASED THE AMOUNT TO 36,700
thanks

Can you try running Create Accounting For payments just before you run the Invoice History Report and re-check .
Thanks

Printer shows wrong cartidge for my hp allin one

Printer shows wrong cartidge for my hp allin one printer.It was working 4 /5 days ago?if noone can help me is there a toll free number i canc all hp without having to pay for it,I posred this 4 times now and nobody has helped me,,,,,,,,I have windows vista and a DX series gateway computer about 7 nonths old now...Well i cant do anything with my printer now??????????

call 1-800-474-6836.

RSA1 infosources under wrong SID after system copy and BDLS has run

Hi we are a BW3.5 SP#21 system on 10202 and hpux 11.23 (ia64). We have an R/3 system connected to the BW system for extracts. Extracts work fine in the productive environment. So 1 production BW system, and 1 production R/3 system. We also have sandbox copies of each made from database copies recently. The environment is as follows:
sid     client     current logical system name     original logical system name after "copy"     system role
BW1     100     FINPBW1100     --     Productive BW system
LH1     100     FINPLH1100     --     Productive R/3 system
LHU     100     FINPLHU100     FINPBW1100     sandbox BW system
LHI     100     FINPLHI100     FINPLH1100     sandbox R/3 system
LHU is a copy of BW1. LHI is a copy of LH1. There is only 1 working client in all systems.
We recently did the copies, creating the LHU/LHI systems. we've completed our "post refresh" checklist on LHU/LHI, including the BDLS work.
BDLS was ran as follows on LHU/100:
>> convert FINPBW1100  FINPLHU100
>> convert FINPLH1100  FINPLHI100
BDLS was ran as follows on LHI/100:
>> convert FINPBW1100  FINPLHU100
>> convert FINPLH1100  FINPLHI100
In RSA1 on sandbox LHU/100, in the "source system" area, the source systems to the sandbox R/3 system LHI/100 tests out ok if you do the check connection and the technical name for the sm59 it points to is correct.
If I check the RSA1 --> Infosources though, and search for LHI.it doesn't find all the "expected" infosources/infopackages.
If instead I search for LH1 it finds the whole list of "expected" infosources/infopackages. But the R/3 system i'm trying to do extracts from is called "LHI" not "LH1".
QUESTION:
does anyone know what needs to happen to convert what we see in RSA1 --> Infosources when searching for LH1 to infosources that we can use which point to LHI it looks like all the data is there in RSA1 -->infosources, it just is under the wrong sid.thanks in advance

Hi Ben,
Sorry to hear that my suggestion did not help. We will have to see what the other experts say!
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/bff13df2-0c01-0010-6ba7-bc50346a6fd8
That link is to the document that I followed when setting up a BWQ system new, and we didn't encounter the same problem that you are experiencing. We are also BW 3.5.
I started on Page 17 which is where Section 3.7 starts.
Hopefully that might help, although that may have been what you were following.
Nick

Tab control shows wrong display for selected tab

My computer crashed when I tried to post this earlier, so I apologize if the first post actually shows up.
I have seen this for years so it is nothing new, but I don't remember seeing it in any release notes (sorry if I missed it).
Upon loading the .vi (or as an executable), the .vi shows the wrong page for the selected tab. After selecting a different tab, the control works fine. Also, if you create a property node to read the tab value, it matches the displayed page....just the selected tab seems to be incorrect.
A work around is to select the default tab before saving the .vi, but why is this happening in the first place?
Attachments:
tab_example.vi ‏24 KB

Hi Stephen,
The erroneous tab display is something I see on most of not all of my code that uses a tab control (each is a typedef).
What change would I make the the typedef? If I disconnect the tab from the typedef then I will loose the advantages of using the typederf...I will stick with the workaround like I have for the past 3+ years.
Isn't this a LabVIEW bug since the displayed tab is not equal to the value read from the control? I have not tried it on this example I posted but in the past, writing to the control does not fix the displayed tab (writing the control may not work since I wrote the same value that LabVIEW thinks is the current value, but the displayed!=actual).
Thanks,
Todd

Calendar app showing wrong date for iCal feed.

Has anyone else noticed that when an iCal feed publishes an event that is after 0000Z, but still on the previous date in local time, it's added to the calendar on the wrong day?
Example: Your phone is being used in Chicago (CST). An ical feed you subscribe to publishes and event for 0300Z on November 5th. That event should then actually be on November 4th at 2100 CST, however, the phone will enter the event with the corrected time of 2100Z, however, won't correct the date which should be on the 4th (CST = GMT -6 hours).

I have my Mac's calendar auto-adjusting to time.apple.com. After coming back from Asia, now my calendar shows that November 11th, 2014 is a Wednesday; it is supposed to be Tuesday!

Calendar on my 8310 shows wrong dates for November 2009

All of the calendar months are correct except November, 2009. Instead of starting on Sunday it starts on Saturday. Any clues on how to fix it?

My DVR manager show no dates at all on scheduled movies!
This was not the case before.
Can wsomebody confirm the same problem or is it only on my side?

HFM 11.1.1.3 ICP Report showing wrong value for Entity Currency Total

Here is the situation.
There are transactions on a ICP account (Entity Currency) 3.305.080
A journal is posted to the same account with the same POV. 307.205
When I run my ICP report on Entity currency i get the correct figure. 3.305.080
When I rum my ICP report on Entity Currency Total I get a wrong figure 307.205 (Equalt Entity Currency Adjustment) where it should have been 3.612.285
Any clues anybody?

There is no limit. In reality there has not been a limit to the volume of data in a single subcube since paging was added in the 4.0 release. Certainly since 64 bit HFM was introduced there really is no limit to the amount of data in a subcube, or the database for that matter.
Now that I've said that, 850,000 records in a single subcube is a lot of data. Prior to 4.0, the development team added an warning message when a subcube exceeded 100,000 records, but this was purely informational. You should still heed the notice. Most applications have a largest-cube size somewhere between 35,000 and 100,000 records (the top entity usually). While I've seen as many as a million records, you may experience performance problems at that point. Make sure you give the database and HFM app servers a lot of memory to handle this.
Since HFM 11.1.2.2 with its configurable dimensions, data can be spread across many more intersections. In your example you have seven custom dimensions, so I can understand how you might have a normal amount of data in each base entity (a few hundred to maybe a couple thousand), but balloon to hundreds of thousands when you get to the top entity. HFM can process a lot of data very quickly, but be careful if you have rules that cycle through all those intersections, such as allocations or maybe cash flow by product.
But there is no hard limit in HFM.

Formula is showing wrong values for dates

Hi i have document date and clear date
number of days is clear date -doc date
my doc date : 10/28/2008
my clear date : 11/24/2008
i have create 2 formula variabes ( at columns i want bring my characters)
nexti have written formula ( variable for clear date- variable for doc date)
but this variable are shwoing data format like
c1 (variable for clear date) : 20,081,124
c2 ( variable for doc date) : 20,081,028
formula c1-c2 is shwoing 96 days actaully original date format (11/24/2008-10/28/2008) i will get less than 30 days.
please let me know how to solve this issues

Hi Suneel,
I m giving you the detailed steps here so as to clear any doubts...
1. In the new formula window right click on Formula Variable and choose New Variable
2. Enter the Variable Name, Description and select Replacement Path in the Processing by field.
Click the Next Button
3. In the Characteristic screen, select the date characteristic that represents the first date to use in the calculation
4. In the Replacement Path screen select Key in the Replace Variable with field. Leave all the other options as they are (The offset values will be set automatically).
5. In the Currencies and Units screen select Date as the Dimension ID
Repeat the same steps to create a formula variable for second date and use them in the calculation.
Follow these steps and your problem will be solved for sure.
Regards,
Yogesh

Itunes 12.0.1 showing wrong applications for Macbook

Using Itunes 12.0.1 when I open the apps in Itunes I see applications for the Iphone instead of apps for the MacBook Pro. How can this be corrected?

OEM showing nonexisted sid

after unable to connect to agent on one of my server i have uninstalled that agent an reinstalled it.
now my oracle enterprise manager grid control that is installed on my local system is able to respective host
but inside this host there is tab which contains target that including all database instance and listener
but it is showing some database instance that is actually i have deleted from server i mean that database doesn't exist in my server but it is showing in OEM
one more thing .. for some database OEM is showing sid like dbname_hostname and for some sid it is showing only sid for exp orcl1 and oracl_hpux
can anybody tell me from where OEM is taking all this details..

If you are using a Unix/Linux flavor for your target, check your /etc/hosts file. Grid Control will read this and include databases that may not exist anymore, but were never removed from /etc/hosts. The sid_machine for the target is most likely that you have multiple databases in the environment with the same sid so GC appends the host name in order to uniquely identify the database.

Aggregate table showing wrong data

Hello Gurus:
I am working on an issue, where a report is showing wrong value for an aggregated fact table.
If I try not including it in query, then results work fine. But by default BI server is pointing to aggregate table ( which it should ).
So my questions are
1) Does Aggregate tables are refreshed automatically with DAC?
2) I know data is wrong in aggregate table. How do I verify?
3) How to make a particular report hit regular table instead of aggregate table?
Please let me know.
Thanks.
~Vinay

Alright. So I made some progress on this issue, HOWEVER it is still not solved.
1) Aggregated tables are refreshed daily with DAC. There is a script for that on server which is created using Aggregate Persistence wizard.
2) ONLY one column is showing wrong data. I have verified this using Toad. However I dont know why is it showing wrong data. Theoretically it should be fine.
3) this question is still same.
How to make a particular report hit regular table instead of aggregate table?
Please help me out.
Thanks.
~Vinay

EWA alert report for java system shows wrong data

Hi,
In our solman system, EWA alert reports are configured every week for all the production systems (both ABAP and JAVA). Recently oracle database was upgraded from 10g to 11g in all the production systems. The EWA alert report for ABAP systems is correctly taking the 11g database details and is suggesting parameter changes. Unforunately the EWA alert report for Java systems is still pointing to 10g database and is suggesting the parameter changes for 10g only but the systems are on 11g.
In SMSY, the database of the java systems is maintained as 11g only and not 10g. STill we are not sure where the data is being fetched from.
Please help me in finding the issue.
Regards,
Ragav

Hello,
iNote 1482818 would be iapplicable if not java checks are being made. You are not reporting no java checks, you are reportijng the check is being performed, but has the wrong value. When you updated the database dis you perform Solman_setup, Mnaaged system setup?
The reason I ask s that is what prepares the java side for EWA. For isntance if you had on old version of ST-SER such as 700_2008_2 then it does not know about Oracle 11.2....but that is on the ABAP side, you would need ST-SEr 701_2010_1 to
recognize ORacle 11.2 on the ABAP side.
So while I am not 100% sure in this specific instance, it seems logical that if the Java side isn't recognizing the Oracle Database version ( which means it is making this check) then you may need to run the Solman_setup, Mnaged system setup to pick up the ability to detect a new version of Oracel on the Java side.
It is certainly worth the try.
Regards,
Paul

No CENTRAL nor DIALOG instance known for system SID

Hi,
We are in the process of setting up our Solution Manager 7.1. Currently we are in the step 'Managed System Configuration'.
We are stuck on the step 7 - "Create Users". There are 4 users to be created which are already there in the systems(Created Manually).
The users are
SAPSUPPORT and SMDAGENT_XXX for ABAP and Java both.
In the ABAP view it gives the error as "No CENTRAL nor DIALOG instance known for system SID".
In the Java view it gives the error as "User Status Cannot be checked".
We are on the below Support Pack status:
SAP_ABA 702 0008 SAPKA70208
SAP_BASIS 702 0008 SAPKB70208
PI_BASIS 702 0008 SAPK-70208INPIBASIS
ST-PI 2008_1_700 0004 SAPKITLRD4
SAP_BS_FND 702 0006 SAPK-70206INSAPBSFND
SAP_BW 702 0008 SAPKW70208
SAP_AP 700 0024 SAPKNA7024
WEBCUIF 701 0005 SAPK-70105INWEBCUIF
BBPCRM 701 0005 SAPKU70105
BI_CONT 706 0003 SAPK-70603INBICONT
CPRXRPM 500_702 0006 SAPK-50006INCPRXRPM
ST 710 0003 SAPKITL703
ST-BCO 710 0001 SAPK-71001INSTBCO
SOCO 101 0000 -
ST-A/PI 01N_700SOL 0000 -
ST-ICO 150_700 0030 SAPK-1507UINSTPL
ST-SER 701_2010_1 0008 SAPKITLOS8
Please suggest a solution to this.
Thanks & Regards,
Ajitabh

Hello Ajitabh,
I'm sure that you will see this error if you expand the error entry:
SPML service failed to process searchRequest
1. If you followed the advices from note 1616058, disabling SPML:
When the SPML is desactivated, the status of users can't be checked.
We are working to provide a note to solve this issue. Note number is 1647267, it is not release yet, but the solution is:
"Enable to flag the user creation to 'manually performed' in solman_setup".
2. If you didn't disable SPML:
Please refer to the steps in this SAP Note : 1647157 which will help you address the issue.
Please let us know the outcome, thanks.
Best regards,
Guilherme

Same SID for QA & Prd systems - pros and cons?

We have the foll systems:
1. Enterprise Portal 7.0
2. NWDI 7.0
3. NW 7.0 (with XECO - Ecommerce)
4. TREX 7.1
5. Content Server 6.40
6. ECC 6.0
Currently the QA and Prd systems have the same SID and system/instance no, although they are on different hosts.
We would like to know what are the long term pros and cons for keeping the QA and Prd SIDs the same for all systems.
We are already making a list, so thought we might as well get more inputs from the community too.
We already have this arrangement for the past 3 months and have not faced any major issues.
A couple of cons though:
1. Cannot use solman as it cannot distinguish between the diff servers with same SID
2. ABAP transports from QA to Prd have to be manually done (cannot use STMS)
Thanks
Prasad

Hi Manoj,
Changing the SID of java systems is a very tedious procedure. Hom sys copy is just a part of the SID change...there are a whole lot of configs to be done after that...the task is eq to a new setup of systems
For once, the efforts put in are huge..you can see there are 5 systems..besides, it will involve coordination from all teams - basis, development, functional, project management.
Here are a few advantages that we know of:
1. No efforts reqd to change back to original SID
2. During disaster recovery, we just have to restore the production database on QA and change the hostname, whereas its not so in case of having diff SIDs
3. For end-users this will be transparent because they will be using the hostname in the URL which is anyways different
We have the same SIDs for the past 3 months and have not seen major issues, but we also would like to know from the long term perspective if there are any risks that we have not foreseen...hence we seek help from the community.
Hope its clear now
Thanks for your response
Prasad

R3trans -d shows wrong SID for "SYSTEM"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for