RA15 and cross company code processing

We are using RA method 15 and have some projects that have account assignment WBS elements from other company codes than the billing WBS element. RA ignores figures from WBS elements with different company codes, hence recording COS in the company code of the account assignment WBS and Revenue (via RA) in the billing WBS element. Instead we would like have all revenue and COS calculated in RA on the billing element based on the incurred costs regardless of the company code in the account assignment WBS element. SAP OSS is suggesting that note 819760 may accomplish this. Does anyone have experience with this note.
We do not want to settle WBS elements within the hierarchy or create multiple billing elements.

Alex
Thanks for the update.
Regards
Virendra

Similar Messages

  • Foreign currency settings and cross company code settings

    Hi
         Any one can send me the configuration documents on foreign currency settings and cross company code postings.
    Regards
    Shilpa.

    Foreign currency settings - OBBS: Define translation ratios
                                            OB08 - Maintain exchange rates
    You can read the relevant IMG help for this.
    Cross company code: OBYA - read the IMG help for this also.
    Regards,

  • Questions on Inter-company and Cross-company sales ordering process..

    Hi,
    I understood the delivery plant and the sales org. is not in the same company code might be the process, but i want to know some details especially in SAP system how it is realized and processed, hope could kindly help me on below questions!! thanks!!
    1)what is the difference between inter-company sales and Cross-company sales??
    2)What is the general document flow and config. when in below 2 cases:
    Suppose the 2 company code under same sap client system, then what kinds of company code,plant config within the system for inter-compan and cross-company, and finally what kind of document flow will it be in the system.
    Suppose the 2 company code is under diff sap system, then what kind of doc flow in each sap system for inter-company and cross-company sales process???
    Thank you very much!!!!

    Hi,
    Basically there are totally Three types of scenarios
    1. Intra Compnay Stock Transport Order
    In this type of scenario, the stock is transfered between Two Plants which are under the same Compnay Code. The document type used here is UB. Here in this scenario the owner ship on the stock is not changed thats way there will not be any Invoice. The process as follows
    a. Create Purchase Order with document type UB - ME21N
    b. Create Replenishment Delivery with Document type NL - VL10B
    c. Picking and PGI - VL02N
    Now stock will be shown in Transit, you can check this using T.Code MB5T.
    d. Do MIGO to receive the stock into ordering plant.
    2. Inter Compnay Stock Transport Order
    This is called as Cross Compnay STO. Here the stock is sent from one plant to another plant which are in two different Compnay codes. That means the Ownership on the stock is changed in this scenario, that way there will be Intercompnay Invoice IV is reaised. Here the stock is just moved to one plant to another plant but not to any customer.
    The Process is as follows
    a. Create a PO using type NB - ME21N
    b. Create a Cross Compnay Replenishment delivery using type NLCC - VL10B
    c. Picking and PGI in VL02N
    d. Inter Compnay Invoice IV is raised by Supplying Compnay code to the Ordering Compnay Code - VF01
        for this a customer created in Supplying Compnay who represents the Ordering Compnay and the invoice is raised against to that customer.
    e. MIGO to receive the stock in Ordering Plant
    f. MIRO to do invoice verification and do Vendor account update. This also can be done by EDI triggering, to update the Vendor Account. That means with this step, ordering compnay will update into its vendor account that he has to give certain amount to the compnay who supplied the stock.
    3. Inter Compnay Customer Sales
    This is similer to the 2 process, but here instead of sending to Plant we will send the stock directly to Customer of other compnay code.
    The process is as follows
    a. Customer raises  normal sales order in another compnay code of type OR - VA01
    b. But if the plant of that compnay does not have stock, then in the order the plant is changed to other compnay code plant.
    c. Delivery is created in supplying Compnay against this Order - VL01
    d. Picking and PGI is done - VL02N
    e. But the stock is sent direclty to customer from supplying plant.
    f. Ordering compnay will raise normal invoice F2 to the customer
    g. Supplying Compnay will raise Intercompnay invoice IV to the Ordering Compnay.
    But for all these process there are some configurations can be done, like
    the material should be extended to both the plants
    a customer is created in supplying plant who represents the ordering plant so that IV can be generated to that customer.
    Supplying Plants should be linked to ordering Sales Org and Distribution channel. etc.
    Hope this is clear.
    Thanks
    Praveen

  • Cross company code downpayment posting error

    Hi,
    When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
    "Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
    Vendor A/c (Company A)
    Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
    Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
    Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
    Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
    How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
    Best regards
    Shanid

    Hi Atif,
    Thanks again for your reply.
    Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
    Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
    I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
    It will be great if you give a solution for this.
    Regards
    Shanu

  • The question about EDI in scenario 'Cross-Company Code Sales Processing'?

    I'm doing the exercise with IDES system for the scenario 'Cross-Company Code Sales Processing'.
    But when posting the EDI, it gave me the error as followings:
    there are related data in table EDPP1, including customer and vendor data, but it still informed me the questions.
    pls help!
    Object 0090033869
    Output type: tst IV for MM by ken
    Processing log for program RSNASTED routine EDI_PROCESSING
    EDI: Partner profile not available
    EDI: Partner profile not available
        Message no. E0332
    Diagnosis
        A partner profile could not be found with the following key:
        /0000000000/LI/
        This involves the key fields of the table EDPP1:
        -PARNUM  partner number
        -PARTYP  partner type
    Procedure
        Please check the EDI partner profiles.
        Execute function

    Hi
    Partner profile is not seems to be maintained in tcode WE20.
    Please maintain in WE20.
    Kind Regards
    sandeep

  • Restrict cross CO area postings and allow cross company code postings

    " There are two Controlling areas CA01 and CA02, for the controlling area CA02 the field CO code validation is inactive to allow cross company code postings ie., (Cost center created in one company code can be used as cost object in other company code ) Also this allows any WBS element created in controlling area CA01 as cost object in any of the company codes assigned in controlling area CA02,
    Due to usage of WBS element which is created in CA01 controlling area as cost object in company code belongs to controlling area CA02, business is facing problem while doing the settlement run with error message " Document data for list of origins does not exist"
    So, I have activated the field Co code validation in the controlling area CA02, which stopped the usage of WBS element between controlling areas. Also this had restricted usage of cost object between company codes with in controlling area CA02.
    Now is there anyway to allow cost object usage between company codes assigned in one controlling area (CA02) and restrict usage of WBS element created in controlling area CA01 in any company code assigned in controlling area CA02.

    Hi,
    As you have already activated the Co Code validation you cant restrict that only to WBS. But you can have another option
    Use the validation process to restrict these errors
    This may help
    Regards
    Shantanu

  • Cross company code purchasing process?

    Hi Hurus,
    I went through previous threads of cross company code purchasing...but got confused..
    could u pls all provide sime inputs as what is cross company code purchasing with example...
    i will be really grateful to u all..

    It is the usual Practice in the Business to have More than One Company Code ..
    And Each Comp Code there will be palnt for Business Process..
    If Plant A is Under Comp Code A & Plant B under Comp Code B
    If Plant A Requires Some material from Plant B , Then It is called Cross Company Purchase..
    Bcz The Balance Sheet ( Profit & Loss Statement) will be at Comp Code Level..
    Usually This Process is addressed in SAP as a Inter Comapny STOCK TRANSPORT ORDER
    The STOCK TRANSPORT ORDER is of Two Types
    1. Intra STO means with in Comp Code
    2.Inter STO Between Diff Comp Codes
    Check
    Re: Stock transport order

  • OBYA : vendor and customer clearing in cross company code transaction

    Hi Gurus,
    Please can any one telll me how to clear the transactions of cross company code which is in vendor and customer.
    I already done a configuration in OBYA for customer - vendor.
    Expected a process of clearing the cross company code transaction.
    Thanks in Advance
    Manish.

    Hi,
    If you are doing for vendor invoice,
    for example:
    co code 1000 and co.code2000
    Use F-02 and enter following transactions
    posting key 31 -vendor- company code 1000
    posting key 25- expenses and enter new company code 2000.
    After the entry it will display 4 line items, 2line item for 1000&2000
    Regards,
    Sreekanth

  • Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
    In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
    While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
    Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
    Message no. F5786
    Diagnosis
    You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
    System Response
    You cannot enter this kind of document.
    Procedure
    Enter the transaction in two documents.
    For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
    The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
    Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
    JBC.

    Hi Mamta,
    Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
    For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
    I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
    Posting        GL                   Co Code
    Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
    Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
    For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
    I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
    Thanks,
    Bapu

  • Cross-Company Code document and Taxes

    Dear all,
    I am posting a cross-company code document with the following characteristics:
    Company A - debit A/R, credit revenue
    Company B - credit A/P, debit expense account
    The document is balanced within each company code, so the I-C clearing accounts are not posted to.
    The problem is that we have taxes on both company codes but it seems (correct if I am wrong) that SAP only posts taxes to the first company code although the documentation says that in certain circumstances it takes the line item company code in order to post the tax. Unfortunately, it doesn't say "how" this is possible and neither gives additional information.
    So, my questions are:
    - Is it possible to enter a tax code for each company?
    - considering that the local currencies of company A and B are not the same (one is in US, the other in Europe), is it true that the transfer tax program (RFBUST10) does not work?
    Your suggestions in how to post taxes to both company codes are appreciated. Thanks.

    Check BKPF-BVORG field.  this cross company co ref will be same in both  documents.

  • Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

    Hello Guys,
    I have a  problem related to cross company code transaction.
    In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
    Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
    But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
    Can anyone help on this?
    Thanks
    Rafael B.

    Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
    The document was created in 2010.
    This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
    More suggestions?
    Regards.
    Rafael

  • Transfer posting of tax in a cross company code transaction thru' RFBUST10

    Hi,
    I have a doubt regarding using the program RFBUST10 transferring the tax in a cross company transaction.
    I have posted an invoice entry as below and I want to transfer the tax posting of 7.00 from company code 1 to company code 2 using the program RFBUST10.
    Cr - 31 - 3rd party vendor - total amount of invoice co code 1 - 214.00
    Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00 co code 1 - C7 (Tax code at 7%)
    Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00  to co code 2 C7 (Tax code at 7%)
    I have successfully posted and the tax amount of 7.00 is also transferred from company code 1 to company code2 but now I have 2  problems:
    1) The program (RFBUST10)  is permitting to transfer  tax for the same cross- company code document multiple times. Please let me know how to track whether the cross company code document is already processed for transfer posting of tax.
    2) In the transfer posting document as below ,the  tax code in the first line item (clearing account) is defaulted to C0 , I would like to know from where this tax code defaults, I have not maintained the default tax code in the GL master.
    Dr - 40 clearing Account 107 - C0 (tax code 0%)
    Cr- 50 clearing account 100 - C7(tax code at 7%)
    Cr - 50 Tax account 7  C7
    Please let me know how to resolve these issues.
    Tks
    SS

    hi venkat sri,
    gud day, did you manage to solve the transfer intercompany tax using program RFBUST10? Could you share the solution?
    Looking forward for your reply.
    Regards,
    Jay

  • Automatically clear the open items for a GL account cross company codes

    Hi FICO experts,
    Can anyone help me on the following issue urgently?
    There are journal entries posted to same GL account with different company code. Is there any way to automatically clear the open items sitting in the GL account in company code A to against the open items for the same GL account in company code B.
    The example is below:
    Journal in company code A
    Dr. 840410      $100
      Cr. 111300       $100
    Journal in company code B
    Dr. 111301   $100
      Cr. 840410      $100
    Now I want to automatically clear account  840410 by using assignment or text in the journal entry.
    It will be highly appreciated for any instructions.
    Adele

    Hello Adele Wang,
    You can enter cross-company code transactions in one step in the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable, and Accounts Payable application components. This function would be used, for example, for centralized procurement or payment.
    Integration:For centralized payments, each individual company code enters its own invoices separately, while a central company code pays them. When you are clearing open items, the system makes clearing entries between the company codes participating in the clearing procedure. These clearing entries represent the receivables and payables that exist between the company codes in centralized payment.
    Prerequisites:You have specified which company codes are to be processed via a single company code. In this specification, you can distinguish between clearing transactions. You can therefore have different combinations of company codes for incoming and outgoing payments.
    You have specified the clearing accounts that record the receivables and payables between the individual company codes. The system posts to these accounts automatically when clearing the open items.
    You need to make  the required settings in the activity Prepare Cross-Company Code Manual Payments in Customizing for Financial Accounting (Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Payments->Manual Outgoing Payments).
    Features:For each company code, the system generates a separate clearing document. A joint transaction number marks these documents as belonging together.
    Example:For a clearing transaction (incoming payment, outgoing payment), you have agreed in Customizing that if company code 0001 is specified, open items are also selected from other company codes (0002 and 0003).
    Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points.
    Rgds
    manish
    Clearing can then also be carried out if the account to be cleared has not been created in company code 0001. As long as no items have to be posted to this account in company code 0001, it is not necessary to create a master record for the account in company code 0001.
    See also:

  • Creating Cross Company Code Vendors/Customers.

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to understand how to create cross company code Vendors and Customers.  I've already established the link with configuring OBYA.  What I'm not clear is on which company code I should be creating the vendor and customer. 
    We have two company codes, 2100 & 0980.  CC 2100 has the central bank tha pays invoices for CC 0980.  I have two issues.
    1. What kind of configuration is needed to accept incoming payments into CC 2100 House banks and lockboxes?
    2. For intercompany activity between 2100 & 0980 how are the vendor and customer master records set up?  I know there needs to be a vendor on the customer master and a customer on the vendor master.
    So for 0980 acting like a vendor for 2100 I'm assuming the vendor number for 0980 is set up as a 2100 vendor.
    The same is true when acting as a customer.  The difference being is that this vendor entered into a field on the customer master and the customer number is entered on a field in the vendor master. 
    I'm missing how the Vendor record, if created on Company Code 2100 gets linked to Company Code 0980.

    For SAP to 'know' that a particular vendor / customer master records represents a specific company code, all these needs to be linked to the same 'company'.
    Companies are maintained in T880 (IMG : enterprise structure -> definition -> Fin Acctg -> Define Company
    Company code is linked to a company in the cocode config. IMG enterprise structure -> Assignment -> Fin Acctg -> Assign comp. code to company
    And finally, the Trading Partner field in the Customer/vendor master is where you assign the company to the cust/vendor.
    This setup will eventually allow you to consolidate interco A/R, A/P, etc.. if you need to but is not necessary for the interco process to post.(although you'd want to have it rght from the get go)

  • Version 4.6c Cross Company Code Incoming payment to lockbox.

    In version 4.6c I am trying to find out the correct IMG configuration for processing incoming payments to a lockbox when multiple companies are using one company for banking.  Here is what I have done so far:
    Here are the company codes:  2100 has house banks and lockbox set up.
                                                      0980 does not have house bank or lockbox.
    OX16 - all both company codes involved are assigned to the same Company.
    OBVU - Non-bank company code  0980 has 2100 set up as Paying Company Code
    OBYA - Clearing accounts have been set up between 0980-2100.
    OB05 - Accounting Clerk has been set up for both company codes.
    OB10 - Lockbox from 2100 has been set up  for 0980.  Even though 0980 does not have a House bank set up, IMG Configuration did allow the lockbox and house bank for 2100 to be saved under 0980.
    OB96 - Forms to be used were linked to 0980
    One issue we are having is that when we attempt to set up a Customer for 0980 a field for Lockbox is required to be entered.  When the 2100 Lockbox is input, an error message pops up saying that 0980 does not have a House Bank. 
    Can someone please explain how to complete the configuration for this type of activity in version 4.6c?  Also should we be using F-28, FB05 or some other t-code to post incoming payments.

    Hello,
    You can post the cross company code postings even between two controlling areas. The system does not prevent to post documents between two company codes in two controlling area. Need not necessarily they should be under one operating concern. Provided you have to make sure that you have followed the following points:
    In OBY6 - To company codes must be assigned to same Company, meaning that you mus thave created a Company and that company must have been assigned to these two company codes.
    OBYA - You should maintain the clearing accounts in both the company codes. Meaning that you are posting one leg in one company code and the other leg in the other company. Therefore, it is required to have the missing legs in each company code.
    Company Code1 - Posting Key 40 - Clearing Account
    Company Code1 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
    Company Code2 - Positng Key 40 - Clearing Account
    Company Code2 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
    OB08 - In case if the two company codes have different local (company code) currencies, you may maintain the exchange rates.
    You can now go to F-02 and post a cross company code transaction giving the first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Missing leg in the first company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA and the missing leg in the second company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA. That means you will have four line items overall.
    The system will post three document.
    Document 1 in First Company Code
    Document 2 in Second Company Code
    and
    Document3 - Cross Company Code Document.
    The cross company code document consists of the first company code document number plus company code plus last two digits of the fiscal year.
    Hope this must have clarified your doubts.
    Please let me know in case if you need further details.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

Maybe you are looking for

  • IPhoto in 10.6.8 fails to load images

    I have iPhoto on two different hard disk boot disks. They both point to the exact same library on a different disk. One disk boots 10.6.8, the other boots in 10.7.4. I need both boot versions to retain the ability to use older legacy programs that wi

  • Loss on scrap sales to be reflected externally

    Hi , The following things reflect while dealing with scrap sales loss.. When the assets which are declared as scrap are retired/ deleted from Asset Inventory list from Asset module, using T-Code ABAVN the system automatically create/post a document c

  • Mail Alert with Triangle Exclamation Mark with iMap - Too Many Connections?

    I have one Laptop (Macbook mid-07) on Leopard 10.5.6 and a Macbook Pro 09 on Leopard 10.5.8. I just switched over to iMap where I have two email accounts set up on both laptops. Both laptops have identical accounts set up on them. I'm currently getin

  • Passing Array to actionPerformed

    In my routine, when a user clicks a button, a label is populated with a description. I'm using "actionPerformed" to update the label on my panel. The problem is, I want "actionPerformed" to retrieve the label description from an array of records that

  • WLS 12.1.2.0.0 : Another user (admin2) already owns the lock.

    hi Please consider a WebLogic Server 12.1.2.0.0 that is NOT in Production Mode (so in Development Mode). When is a button like "Take Lock & Edit" (ever) to be expected? Or messages like : - "admin2 is currently making changes." - "Another user (admin