Range checking in Schema

Can schema allows auto range checking?
Or do I need to specifiy the max and min range in the schema and check it in my code?
Thanks
Eva

Hi Eva,
I didnt understand your question very clearly. Maybe what you are asking is that is it possible to automatically check the range entered in the XML file by its schema file.
The answer to this is yes. There are 2 attributes which we can set... maxValue and minValue.
Minvalue specifies the low end of the range of possible values. Maxvalue specifies the high end. Minvalue must be less than or equal to maxvalue .
An Example qould be
<scalar digits="4" decimals="3" minvalue="-9999" maxvalue="8888" minexclusive="true"/>
I hope this helps.

Similar Messages

How to check vendor schema group for info record for third party vendor

Hi Expert,
How to check vendor schema group that assigned in info record for third party vendor?
Thanks

Hi,
Vendor schema group is not assigned in info record, It is assigned in purchasing data view of vendor master ( Check in XK03 )
You can check in Vendor master- XK03- Purchasing data.
hope it will help u.
Deepak

How to insure range check elimination optimization is occurring

I'm wondering if there is a way to tell whether or not the optimizer is employing the range check elimination optimization on a particular loop. Although I'd rather not, I can generate the assembly code via -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, but I'm not exactly sure what I'm looking for. Any help is greatly appreciated.
I'm also wondering if the range check optimization only occurs for arrays, or if it is used when the object being accessed is a List for example, although once I have an answer to my first question, I can investigate this on my own.
Thanks!

I suspect it's left deliberately unspecified to allow flexibility among versions and platforms, and even within a given run on a given JVM. However, everything I've read strongly suggests that [url http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Interviews/devinsight_1/]writing dumb code, such as your basic, standard array loop, will enable that optimization to be performed (as hotspot is specifically tuned to common idioms):
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
// do stuff that does change the value of i or arr
}Alternatively, using a foreach loop should be expected to generate this kind of code.
As for the bottleneck, is what you're doing in one loop iteration so small that it's reasonable to expect that that operation, plus incrementing i will not dwarf the array bounds comparison? Or have you been able to determine that the check itself is the bottleneck?

Range check affects scopes

I have noticed that if I have some scopes up (mainly RGB Parade and Waveform monitor) and turn on range checking, it changes the output on the scopes. So what is the most accurate way of using the scopes - with range checking on or off? And why does it change them in the first place?

Changing the different range check options does not affect the scopes, rather it seems to be a range check on or off difference. I was thinking the stripes from the check may be affecting the scopes, but there is absolutely no motion on the scopes when the stripes are moving. Give it a shot - load up a clip of any video, load up the scopes (try the luminance layout) and turn the range checking on and off. I can reproduce this on all the FCP machines I have tried (ver 5.1.2), so chances are it will do it for you too. It almost makes the scopes bold, and it changes the whites and black levels enough to make the scope unusable without knowing which way is correct. As a side note, the first link you posted at larryjordan.biz seems to now be incorrect. I took his test jpeg and my scopes still showed the levels of the boxes outside of the title safe zone.

Range check of LabVIEW controls

In LabVIEW, one can specify that a control have a valid range of entries (i.e. min/max/increment). If you run this VI from LabVIEW, everything works great. However, when that VI is invoked from TestStand, values outside the range are allowed to be passed in. Is there a good/easy way to apply the same constraints on the TestStand side, or do we have to perform range checking on all user-supplied inputs?

When you're creating your sequence file (in the seq editor), you list your step name, step type, etc, then you specify module and point to the VI you want this step to call. At that point in the seq editor, you specify any parameter defaults you'd like to over write.

Disabling range checking during array access.

I believe there should be a way to accomplish the above via some javac option.
Context: I'm writing a pure Java-based volume renderer (i.e., no JNI), with emphasis on speed. I'm not happy with the fact that even though I can trivially guarantee legal array indices to my 3D-array accesses (say, via outer for-loops covering the volume extents... a construct I can't escape anyways in the context of my application), Java continues to distrust my programming abilities and goes on 'needlessly' performing range checking for me!
I fully appreciate the fact that in 99% of the cases, most developers would want it the way we have it currently. However, the language should not constrain everybody unnecessarily all the time.
Anyone, any insights on how to work this around (in Java)? Thanks!
Harry

>
Anyone, any insights on how to work this around (in
Java)? Thanks!Short of writing your own VM implementation this won't be happening.
Alternatively you can change your approach in a way that this is not a bottleneck for you.
But honestly this question has come up before and while you may not want to hear it the short answer is no. So I would recommend you look in a different direction to solve your problem.

How to check two schemas

Hi all,
In my environment, 2 schemas are exists on same server.
One schema is base version and other is also same as first one with little bit structural changes.
The first schema is performing very well and 2nd schema is working very poorly as performance concerned.
I was rolled back the changes 2nd schema to make it look like 1st schema and still it is performing poorly.
Please provide me suggestions on where to check for the problem?
Thanks,
Sandeep

Hi,
I do not think so schema perform badly?
You meant to say queries running on objects in Schema2 is performing badly?
If yes then look at the tkprof of some of the queries on objects of Schema2.
Most of the time when you do replication like this, there are chances that you miss out the index. But this is not in your case or is it?
Regards
Anurag

How to check in schema weather table is created by user or system?

For list outing the tables in schema
I will execute the any below queries
SELECT DISTINCT OWNER, OBJECT_NAME FROM DBA_OBJECTS WHERE OBJECT_TYPE = 'TABLE' AND OWNER = 'SCHEMA NAME'
OR
SELECT * FROM ALL_TABLES;
or
SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES;
or
SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES;
after generating this how we find that in schema which table is created by system and user??

leen wrote:
For list outing the tables in schema
I will execute the any below queries
SELECT DISTINCT OWNER, OBJECT_NAME FROM DBA_OBJECTS WHERE OBJECT_TYPE = 'TABLE' AND OWNER = 'SCHEMA NAME'
OR
SELECT * FROM ALL_TABLES;
or
SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES;
or
SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES;
after generating this how we find that in schema which table is created by system and user??
Your question makes no sense.
Tables are ALWAYS created by a USER. That user could be SYS, SYSTEM or any other user in the DB.

Range check for numeric values in varchar2 type column

SQL oracle 10g windows XP
I have a table which has column of type varchar2 e.g
create table osa_gms_mailbox(reg_address varchar2(60),bin_address varchar2(60));
let us insert some sample rows:
insert into osa_gms_mailbox values ('8000','8000');
insert into osa_gms_mailbox values ('9000','9000');
insert into osa_gms_mailbox values ('[email protected]','[email protected]');
If i try to run the query :
select reg_address from (
select reg_address from osa_gms_mailbox
MINUS
select reg_address from osa_gms_mailbox where
regexp_like(reg_address,'^[a-z]+|[A-Z]+$')) temp
where to_number(temp.reg_address) between 1000 and 10000;
or
select reg_address from (
select reg_address from osa_gms_mailbox
MINUS
select reg_address from osa_gms_mailbox where
regexp_like(reg_address,'^[a-z]+|[A-Z]+$'))
where to_number(reg_address) between 1000 and 10000;
it gives ORA-01722: invalid number .
how can i get the numeric comparision done for varchar2 field and exclude the rows which have atleast one alphabet (a-z,A-Z)
Thanks

Hi
Please check this sample , it may useful to you
/*Creating a Table*/
Create Table CHECKVARCHAR( CheckValue Varchar2(20) );
/* Inserting values in to the column with numbers and Strings */
Insert into CHECKVARCHAR Values ( 1000 );
Insert into CHECKVARCHAR values ( 2000 );
Insert into CHCEKVARCHAR values ( 10000 );
Insert into CHECKVARCHAR values ( 'Abc' );
Insert into CHECKVARCHAR values ( 'zyx' );
/*Here is the Query to avoid Invalid Number */
Select * from
( Select CheckValue
from Checkvarchar
where Ascii( Substr( CheckValue,1,1 ) ) not between 65 and 122 )
where CheckValue between 1000 and 10000;

Checking the schema-wise disk space usage

hi
can we get the disk space usage for every individual schema separately ?

What about this:
select OWNER, sum(BYTES) from DBA_SEGMENTS group by OWNER

Can somebody help me to check my schema?

i registered the schema, but i still cannot add the xml documents into the tables.
I want to add the documents as a column, so that i can build some view tables after that.
the sample xml documents like this:
<ChineseGlossary xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="C:\hkliss\glossary\cglossary.xsd">
<ChineseExpression expression="工作天">
<EnglishExpression expression="business day" />
<Reference ChapterRef="4A" SectionRef="65, 第5(4)條規則" />
<SubExpression>
<ChineseSubExpression expression="工作天" />
<EnglishSubExpression expression="working day" />
<Reference ChapterRef="187" SectionRef="2A(2)(a)" />
</SubExpression>
</ChineseExpression>
<ChineseExpression expression="工作日">
<EnglishExpression expression="working day" />
<Reference ChapterRef="478" SectionRef="2(1)" />
</ChineseExpression>
<ChineseExpression expression="工作守則">
<EnglishExpression expression="code of practice" />
<Reference ChapterRef="51" SectionRef="2" />
</ChineseExpression>
</ChineseGlossary>
here is my schema:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xdb="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb" xdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true">
     <xs:element name="ChineseGlossary" type="ChineseGlossaryType"/>
     <xs:complexType name="ChineseGlossaryType">
          <xs:sequence>
               <xs:element name="ChineseExpression" type="ChineseExpressionType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
          </xs:sequence>
     </xs:complexType>
     <xs:complexType name="EnglishSubExpressionType">
          <xs:attribute name="expression" type="string_2000"/>
     </xs:complexType>
     <xs:complexType name="ChineseSubExpressionType">
          <xs:attribute name="expression" type="string_2000"/>
     </xs:complexType>
     <xs:complexType name="ChineseExpressionType">
          <xs:sequence>
               <xs:element name="EnglishExpression" type="EnglishSubExpressionType"/>
               <xs:element name="Reference" type="ReferenceType"/>
               <xs:element name="SubExpression" type="cSubExpressionType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
          </xs:sequence>
          <xs:attribute name="expression" type="string_2000"/>
     </xs:complexType>
     <xs:complexType name="ReferenceType">
          <xs:simpleContent>
               <xs:extension base="string_2000">
                    <xs:attribute name="ChapterRef" type="string_2000"/>
                    <xs:attribute name="SectionRef" type="string_2000"/>
               </xs:extension>
          </xs:simpleContent>
     </xs:complexType>
     <xs:simpleType name="string_2000">
          <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
               <xs:minLength value="0"/>
               <xs:maxLength value="2000"/>
          </xs:restriction>
     </xs:simpleType>
     <xs:complexType name="cSubExpressionType">
          <xs:sequence>
               <xs:element name="ChineseSubExpression" type="ChineseSubExpressionType"/>
               <xs:element name="EnglishSubExpression" type="EnglishSubExpressionType"/>
               <xs:element name="Reference" type="ReferenceType"/>
          </xs:sequence>
     </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
after i build the table with 1 field for the unique id, 1 field for the XMLType documents, error occurs like this:
INSERT INTO CGLOSSARY VALUES(1, XMLTYPE(bfilename('DATA','c-glossary00001.xml'),nls_charset_id('AL32UTF8')))
ERROR in line 1:
ORA-19007: SCHEMA - not expected
http://localhost:8081/public/hkliss/cglossary.xsd.
- 'DATA' in the insert statement above is the link where the XML documents stored.
can anyone help me?
Message was edited by:
user551705

Your schema location hint is incorrect in the instance document
C:\hkliss\glossary\cglossary.xsd
should be the value of the SchemaURL used when registering the XML Schema

Same nr range in Invoice Verification (MIRO) and FI document

Dear all can you please help to solve this issue?
We would like to have the same number range for invoice verification and for financial document, what we have to do?
Regards
Marco

Please follow the steps as below
Step 1. Maintain FI document number range. Use transaction OMR4 and go to Number range for document types in FI. Select the company code for which you want to create the new number range interval and click on the change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert interval button on top of the screen.for example, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. Don't forget to set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 2. Assign FI number range to FI document types. The second step is to assign the number range created in step 1 to the FI document type for invoices. Again use transaction OMR4 and go to Document type. Double-click on the document type, which you are using for LIV invoices. In my example, I used the SAP standard document type RE. In the number range field, assign the new number range interval 52
Step 3. Maintain MM document number ranges. Use transaction OMRJ and click on change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert button at the top of the screen. For MM documents, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. For the internal number range assignment, do not set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.
hope now that things r clear
reward accordingly

XML Schema Collection (SQL Server 2012): How to create an XML Schema Collection that can be used to Validate a field name (column title) of an existing dbo Table of a Database in SSMS2012?

Hi all,
I used the following code to create a new Database (ScottChangDB) and a new Table (marvel) in my SQL Server 2012 Management Studio (SSMS2012) successfully:
-- ScottChangDB.sql saved in C://Documents/SQL Server XQuery_MacLochlainns Weblog_code
-- 14 April 2015 09:15 AM
USE master
IF EXISTS
(SELECT 1
FROM sys.databases
WHERE name = 'ScottChangDB')
DROP DATABASE ScottChangDB
GO
CREATE DATABASE ScottChangDB
GO
USE ScottChangDB
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[marvel] (
[avenger_name] [char] (30) NULL, [ID] INT NULL)
INSERT INTO marvel
(avenger_name,ID)
VALUES
('Hulk', 1),
('Iron Man', 2),
('Black Widow', 3),
('Thor', 4),
('Captain America', 5),
('Hawkeye', 6),
('Winter Soldier', 7),
('Iron Patriot', 8);
SELECT avenger_name FROM marvel ORDER BY ID For XML PATH('')
DECLARE @x XML
SELECT @x=(SELECT avenger_name FROM marvel ORDER BY ID FOR XML PATH('Marvel'))--,ROOT('root'))
SELECT
person.value('Marvel[4]', 'varchar(100)') AS NAME
FROM @x.nodes('.') AS Tbl(person)
ORDER BY NAME DESC
--Or if you want the completed element
SELECT @x.query('/Marvel[4]/avenger_name')
DROP TABLE [marvel]
Now I am trying to create my first XML Schema Collection to do the Validation on the Field Name (Column Title) of the "marvel" Table. I have studied Chapter 4 XML SCHEMA COLLECTIONS of the book "Pro SQL Server 2008 XML" written by
Michael Coles (published by Apress) and some beginning pages of XQuery Language Reference, SQL Server 2012 Books ONline (published by Microsoft). I mimicked Coles' Listing 04-05 and I wanted to execute the following first-drafted sql in
my SSMS2012:
-- Reference [Scott Chang modified Listing04-05.sql of Pro SQL Server 2008 XML by Michael Coles (Apress)]
-- [shcColes04-05.sql saved in C:\\Documents\XML_SQL_Server2008_code_Coles_Apress]
-- [executed: 2 April 2015 15:04 PM]
-- shcXMLschemaTableValidate1.sql in ScottChangDB of SQL Server 2012 Management Studio (SSMS2012)
-- saved in C:\Documents\XQuery-SQLServer2012
tried to run: 15 April 2015 ??? AM
USE ScottChangDB;
GO
CREATE XML SCHEMA COLLECTION dbo. ComplexTestSchemaCollection_all
AS
N'<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xsd:element name="marvel">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:all>
<xsd:element name="avenger_name" />
<xsd:element name="ID" />
</xsd:all>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>';
GO
DECLARE @x XML (dbo. ComplexTestSchemaCollection_all);
SET @x = N'<?xml version="1.0"?>
<marvel>
<avenger_name>Thor</name>
<ID>4</ID>
</marvel>';
SELECT @x;
GO
DROP XML SCHEMA COLLECTION dbo.ComplexTestSchemaCollection_all;
GO
I feel that drafted sql is very shaky and it needs the SQL Server XML experts to modify to make it work for me. Please kindly help, exam the coding of my shcXMLTableValidate1.sql and modify it to work.
Thanks in advance,
Scott Chang

Hi Scott,
2) Yes, FOR XML PATH clause converts relational data to XML format with a specific structure for the "marvel" Table. Regarding validate all the avenger_names, please see below
sample.
DECLARE @x XML
SELECT @x=(SELECT ID ,avenger_name FROM marvel FOR XML PATH('Marvel'))
SELECT @x
SELECT
n.value('avenger_name[1]','VARCHAR(99)') avenger_name,
n.value('ID[1]','INT') ID
FROM @x.nodes('//Marvel') Tab(n)
WHERE n.value('ID[1]','INT') = 1 -- specify the ID here
--FOR XML PATH('Marvel') --uncommented this line if you want the result as element type
3)i.check the xml schema content
--find xml schema collection
SELECT ss.name,xsc.name collection_name FROM sys.xml_schema_collections xsc JOIN sys.schemas ss ON xsc.schema_id= ss.schema_id
select * from sys.schemas
--check the schema content,use the name,collection_name from the above query
SELECT xml_schema_namespace(N'name',N'collection_name')
3)ii. View can be viewed as virtual table. Use a view to list the XML schema content.
CREATE VIEW XSDContentView
AS
SELECT ss.name,xsc.name collection_name,cat.content
FROM sys.xml_schema_collections xsc JOIN sys.schemas ss ON xsc.schema_id= ss.schema_id
CROSS APPLY(
SELECT xml_schema_namespace(ss.name,xsc.name) AS content
) AS cat
WHERE xsc.name<>'sys'
GO
SELECT * FROM XSDContentView
By the way, it would be appreciated if you can spread your questions into posts. For any question, feel free to let me know.
Eric Zhang
TechNet Community Support

PR number range issue

Dear All,
While creating PR I am getting an error "Number range 01 for object BANF not defined"
Please help
Thanks

Hi,
If you are using external number range check the number range in spro for PR for the required doc type and give the number in that range

How to change number range for document type ?

Dear All
Experts
How to change the number range for document types for entry view? I am trying to change the number range for all document type as per defined ranges in FBN1, but at the time of saving document type and number range the system is throwing error message as
Doc. type C1: Number range 07 is used for ledger L6 with doc. type AE
Message no. FAGL_LEDGER_CUST093
I have defined a leading ledger in system too with these settings
1)     Define ledger for accounting.
2)     Defining currencies for it.
3)     Defining ledger group for the same.
4)     Defining accounting principles
5)     Assignment of principles to leading ledger.
Are there any extra settings required for leading ledger settings?
I have some doubts those are :-
How document types defined at ledger level?
How to define them at leading ledger level? (Like my case)
Focus on this will be appreciable.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

hi ,
The document numbers in the leading ledger and the non leading ledgers should be in sync, they should not have any differences, so incase you are trying to change the number range for C1, the number range 07 is already been assigned to doc type AE. i guess you have cant use 07 for C1. may be you can try out with an other number range. check this and let me know if you are able to do this.
coming to
1.How document types defined at ledger level?
2.How to define them at leading ledger level? (Like my case)
Ans 1. please try defining document types for entry view in a ledger.
path : SPRO- financial accounting new -financial accounting global settings new - document -document types -define document types for entry view in ledger.
upon prompt enter the ledger and go ahead creating the number ranges for the document types.
Hope this helps.
Regards
amrutha

Range checking in Schema

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for