How to check vendor schema group for info record for third party vendor

Hi Expert,
How to check vendor schema group that assigned in info record for third party vendor?
Thanks

Hi,
Vendor schema group is not assigned in info record, It is assigned in purchasing data view of vendor master ( Check in XK03 )
You can check in Vendor master- XK03- Purchasing data.
hope it will help u.
Deepak

Similar Messages

  • Vendor schema group not appearing in purchasing data of Vendor sub range

    Hi Experts,
    I have created a vendor sub range and when maintaining the purchasing data, the vendor schema group field is not visible.
    Is there any specific settings reqd. after maintaining the sub-range.
    Please provide pointers!!!

    HI Sandeep,
    As i said this is not possible in stanadard SAP.
    Even when you try opening VSR specific Purchasing data, there you will NOT get vendor schema group.
    Reason is, Vendor Schema group will be maintained at Main vendor level. So irrespective of VSR, it will pick pricing procedure in the purchasiong Document.
    VSR:  In the vendor master, you can maintain different data for particular vendor sub-ranges, such as ordering addresses or terms of payment, for example.
    When creating a purchase order with a known vendor, different data is only determined if the vendor sub-range is entered in the initial screen.
    Hope this clears.
    Rgds
    Utsav

  • How does vendor determine if no info record is maintained for the material

    how does vendor determine if no info record is maintained for the material

    Hi
    If you have to determine a vendor, the minimum requirement is Info record. Beyond that, you can ofcourse maintain Source Lists, Quota Arrangements but Info record is bare minimum for automatic determination of vendor.
    Otherwise, you have to maintain the vendor manually in th Purchasing docs.
    Tcodes for Info record are ME11, ME12, and ME13.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks

  • Problem in creating Info record for vendor -AFFI account group

    Hi experts,
    I am trying to create a info record for a material for a vendor -1000 which is of AFFI account group.
    system in giving me an error saying that the material is not maintain in the plant 1000. However the plant i am working is for 2000 and the master data is maintained. I dont know why the system is giving a weird message taking the vendor code as the plant and giving the message " Material is not maintained in the plant"
    I have created an info record for this same material with another vendor code of the same AFFI account group. I think i am missing something in the master data of the vendor.
    Can anybody throw some lights on this.
    regards
    DP

    I got the solution. Thread closed.

  • ****Vendor Schema Group

    Hi Experts,
    I had set up a specific pricing procedure for Diesel Fuel vendor by attaching it to vendor schema group. Now a new requirement has come up that the same diesel fuel vendor might supply other materials with diesel fuel. How do i seperate my pricing procedure so that it does not effect the PO creation for regular materials where the pricing procedure is not required to be called.
    Looking forward for your answer
    Mavrik

    Hello,
    This kind of Requirements shall be addressed in 2 ways.
    1.Create 2 different Vendors and assign different schema's
    2.Create 2 different Pur. Organisations and assign 2 different schema for the same vendor.As you aware the Schema's are assigned in the Purchasing view only.
    When you mention your Pur. org. and vendor in your PO, system can differentiate and pick the correct schem's. 
    If both are not possible, try to accomodate the changes in the same Pricing procedure?(!)
    Hope it helps you.
    Mug

  • BAPI for Sampling scheme and Quality Info Record in QM Module.

    Hi techies,
    I have a two object(Sampling Scheme,Quality info record)  for which i need a BAPI for uploading the data.
    Please tell me if any one knows.
    Richard.

    Vineeth,
    Usually, I wouldn't think the follow-up action would be an issue with system performance.  You say 7000 items, but do you mean 7000 UD's?  I.e. an inspection lot of 1000 units isn't unusual and that would be 7 inspection lots.  You've also now said that the program needs to look across plants for UD rejections and for notifications.  That is another level of complexity.
    While the UD follow-up action should still be able to handle that, I can't say it won't affect performance.  I was going to suggest you have it only run on certain UD codes, but since you now need to reveiw this across plants that might not work.
    What happens if my vendor/material is in a skip stage at plant A and Plant B opens a notification agains the vendor?  Since there is no UD, the follow-up action wouldn't run and change the DMR at plant A.
    If you need to look at a bunch of stuff, instead of the follow-up action, you may need to run a program in batch and have it run once an hour or every 10 minutes.  Depending on how you write it, it could be pretty efficient. 
    Craig

  • Purchase info record for material groups

    Hi all,
    We have purchase info records for material groups, not material specific. When I create and activate integration model for these info records, no info record is sent to APO. Is there a way to create Transportaiton Lanes automatically in APO?
    Regards,
    Jenny

    Hi,
    In APOPurchase info record is transfered as external procurement relationship.
    Generally Transportation lanes are created automatically for plant to plant transfer when you define special procurement key in MRP view of material master accordingly.
    In case of T. lane for vendor, automatic generation may not work. Still you may try using correct special procurement key + material specific vendor info record..
    Thanks,
    Mangesh A. Kulkarni

  • How to use Purch. Info Record, for different Valuation Types ?

    Hi All,
    While doing Split Valuation,
    I have created three valuation types - say,  M1,M2,M3. for material M.
    Now, I want to create Info record for material M and Vendor V1.
    when i go to me11, system is allowing me to create info record for M and V1 once only,
    in Purchasing Organization View, I'm getting the Valuation type field,
    but can't entering 3 prices for 3 valuation types,
    such as in Material Master.
    Can any one help me regarding this....
    Thanks,
    Anand.

    if u create po with info update indicator then u can use your valuatiion type in po for whihc there is no ifo recrod existing then system willl createt one
    but actually the price will get stored in the price oder history not exactly in the pir

  • HOW CAN I CREATE A GROUP WITH MY CONTACTS FOR TEXTING

    HOW CAN I CREATE A GROUP WITH MY CONTACTS FOR TEXTING

    Olga, this is not a default feature in iPhone. You need a 3rd party application. I have created a free one, Easy Group, for group texting and group emailing.
    http://itunes.apple.com/fr/app/easy-group/id461469079?mt=8
    Rémi
    Note: I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise,from my recommendation or link.

  • Purchasing info record for vendor's material number ONLY?

    Hello gurus,
    we have materials that must be ordered with refernce to a contract. We purchase these materials only from one vendor and exclusively using that contract (only one source of supply). We do need purchasing info records to store the vendor's material number.
    Now, the problem is that if we have one contract and a purchasing info record, the system interprets the PIR as a second dource of supply. So, when I create a new PO, the price is automatically taken from the PIR and not from the contract.
    Is it possible to create PIR's for the vendor's material number without creating a second soucre of supply?
    Thanks in advance
    Alicia
    PS: I do know that i can use order lists but that does not solve the problem when manually creating a new PO...

    why dont you maintain the vendors material number already in the contract item?
    why do you create an info record that has a different price than the contract?
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Jan 5, 2009 2:21 PM

  • How to check whether follow on document is created for sc or po,is there any table or fm available?

    How to check whether follow on document is created for sc or po,is there any table or fm available?

    Hello Venu
    Check FM: BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL and BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL table E_HEADER_REL
    Check this: SRM Shopping cart and PO tables link
    Regards

  • Subcontracting Info record for Same Vendor which is used in Purchasing vendor

    Hi Gurus,
    When we want to create info record for both standard and sub contract  with one single vendor.,  system is not creating a separate info record.
    It is considering the same  Info record for all the options.  This triggers error -  Info record price does not match.
    Reg,
    Suresh

    Yes.. That's correct. System will just update the same info record number.. But you should not face any problem for price fetching...
    System will work properly for standard PO and subcontracting PO..
    System will compare the item category of info record and PO line item, as per this comparison, system will pick the price from info record..
    You can see in the above screen shot the value 3 indicates that it is for subcontracting PO.
    Standard PO :
    I am just changing the item category from blank to L.
    Subcontracting PO:
    **Edited by: Dëv Päträ

  • Mass Creation of Material Group Purchase info record

    Dear All
    Currently we are developing a custom transaction in SAP to mass upload Purchase Info records from a flat file (excel)
    We are using the standard Function Module ME_POST_INFORECORD to create the PIR s
    We use two different number ranges for Material and Material Group PIR s. This is set up already in SPRO>MM>PIR>Define Number Ranges
    Purchasing info record for stock material (Group - IL ) have a number range X
    Purchasing info record for material group (non-stock mat.)(Grpup -IN) have number range Y
    So when we create a Material PIR manually in SAP it picks X number range and  Y number range for Material Group PIR
    But when we create Material Groups PIR via the new custom transaction it creates PIR s with Number range X.
    Upon checking understood that the standard FM ME_POST_INFORECORD is always defaulting the Number Range Group as IL internally . Seems like a harcoding done by SAP
    Wanted to know
    - Is there any another FM we should consider while creating Material Group PIR s. Any other Function module provided by SAP for that ?
    - Or what can be other way to resolve this ?
    Please let me know your views on this.
    Regards
    Shyam

    Hi,
    For mass upload from flat files you can consider LSMW with different options e.g. IDoc:
    Message Type         INFREC
    Basic Type           INFRECMASS01
    or simply via recording of transaction (this should be using exactly the same NR as you have when doing this manually).
    Regards,
    Tomek

  • Import multiple info records for 1 material item in repository

    Hi Guys,
    I have got sort of a puzzle I can not solve at the moment, maybe some one can help me to solve it. The situation in our system landscape is as follows:
    Systems:
    SRM 5.0 (Classic implementation scenario)
    ECC 6.0
    SRM-MDM 2.0
    PI 2005
    Material master is maintained in R/3 and the materials are replicated to SRM. From SRM we replicate all materials to the catalog repository in SRM-MDM.
    As the material master in R/3 is vendor independent, the materials replicated to SRM also have no vendor attached. For the first initial material replication from SRM to the catalog SRM-MDM this also means that the products in the main table of the repository, u2018catalog positionsu2019, will not have a vendor or vendor number attached (i.e. no reference to a source of supply).
    To assign a source of supply in the repository to a product (record) we will use info records which are replicated from R/3 to SRM-MDM. The mapping for this in the Import Manager can only be based on the product number. As this is the only unique value available which can map a info record to a already existing (but vendor less) ptoduct item in the catalog.
    As long as every item in the repository has only one unique info record, meaning one source of supply with a specific price, there is no issue in the above scenario. Based on the product-id, the info record data will be matched with the material item in the catalog.
    The issue for me arises when multiple info records exists for the same material. The info records can heave different vendors and different prices. All possible vendors should be available in the catalog for the same material (at least this is the requirement ).
    At this point the product-id will no longer be an unique value. Importing the info records will cause problems, as only one material record is available in the repository for the specific product-id (remember that when doing a initial replication of the material master to the catalog, no vendor data is replicated).
    Does anyone had this issue before, and knows a solution? Is it for example possible during the import of the info records in the Import manager, to duplicate material records in the destination data, based on the number of info records available in the source data for the same product-id. Or is there an other solution that I am missing?
    Your help would be appreciated!
    Regards,
    Skander

    Hi Shai & Ravi,
    Thanks for your answers. The MDM version which we are using is 5.5 - currently on SP6
    @ Shai: you are right; the standard SRM-MDM 2.0 catalog repository has a qualified lookup table u2018priceu2019, in which itu2019s possible to store the info record data. The standard fields in this sub-table are: Purchase Org, Amount, Currency Lower B, PIR-ID, price based quantity and Price based quantity UoM.
    I added some extra fields (non qualified), to accompany the remaining info record data (product no. u2013 vendor id  u2013 product category)  which is exported/imported, via the standard extraction program in R/3: Tcode MECCM
    I tried the solution Ravi proposed. This scenario works fine when, for example you want to maintain multiple info records for one specific material record in the main table (all info records related to the same source of supply, i.e. vendor). But as I described, the info records we import for one product can have different vendors. 
    The source of supply (vendor) in the shopping cart of SRM is determined via the u2018supplieru2019 field in the main repository table (which is in itself a flat lookup table ). What happens now is that all related info records are added to the u2018price informationu2019 field of the specific product record in the main table. Thus info records which have different suppliers are attached to a record in the main table which will have one specific supplier in the u2018supplieru2019 field. So from my point of view this will not work.
    I am still stuck with the situation that the material master import will only import one record for every distinct product, which can have multiple info records. The info records can/will have different vendors. As the supplier field in the main table determines the source of supply in the shopping cartu2026. Iu2019am seeking for a solution which will duplicate the material records in the main table, based on the amount of imported info records for that specific material record, that have distinct vendors.
    Shai, if you have some useful info on how you accomplished this requirement on a previous version of SRM-MDM, it would be greatly appreciated if you can share it..
    Thx.
    Skander

  • Mass Change Of Vendor Code in Purchasing Info Records

    Hi All,
    I have one query and I already search a lot for it but didn't find any specific solutions.
    I want to change a vendor code in around 1000 Purchasing Info Record, I had already tried for Mass Maintenance Through T. Code - MEMASSIN, But I found Vendor field in New Values as Grey Field.
    Is there any other way to mass change of Vendor in Purchasing Info Records.
    Why vendor field is showing me as a grey Field?
    Thanks In advance
    With Regards,
    Patanjali Bhagat

    Hi Govardhan,
    Pl correct me if i am wrong....EINA-RELIF field is to check and uncheck for regular vendor...It will not change the vendor ID...
    EINA-LIFNR...is the field to change vendor no.., but i can not see this field name is not there in the table...
    Still i think that we can not change the vendor id's once it is created for Info record...
    Pl correct me if am wrong.
    Uts

Maybe you are looking for