Re: Calculation for Freight tax in Purchase Order
Hi All,
Please help me in this issue.
Presently my client is using following scenario.
Suppose the freight amount including tax is 500 INR ,The tax is 7 %.
At present the SAP is calculating ax in the following manner.
Amount Excluding Tax: 500/1.07=467.29
Tax = 500-467.29=32.71
Now they want the tax to be calculated in the following manner
Amount Excluding Tax: 500*0.93=465
Tax = 500*0.07=35
The conditon types used are:
ZBX9:Gross Price Formula
ZWVS: Input tax manulaly: %age
ZS12Transport: Value
Please help me to do the changes as required.
Regards,
vivek
HI Pankaj,
Thanks for your response. Can you try to bit explain me what you are saying.
& show me where I have to maintain the settings.
Regards,
Similar Messages
-
Enforce Tax on Purchase Order Not Working
Hello Experts,
I am working in 11.5.10.2 and I am trying to enable the "enforce tax on purchase order." I've enabled this functionality in Payables and I test it by creating an Invoice. The Tax Code at the Header level of the invoice is not the same as the Tax Code on the Shipment level of the Purchase Order. I created the invoice and then I matched the invoice to the PO. I then automatically calculated the tax. Once the PO is matched to the invoice, the Distribution in the Invoice has the Tax Code that was on the Shipment level of the PO; however, at the Header level of the Invoice it has a different Tax Code. Why is my invoice not being placed on Hold with the Tax Difference Hold once the Validation takes place? The Tax Code at the Header level of the invoice is not the same as the Tax Code at the Shipment level of the PO. The Distribution level of the invoice though is the same as the Shipment level of the PO.
Thanks.Dear
Oracle Application 11i and Database is 10g R2 and OS is HP UX.
when I check concurrent request's view log for this alter it show no record found
and show query following query.
SELECT segment1, rowid, authorization_status
INTO &pr_number , &row_id, &auth_status
FROM PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL
where upper(authorization_status) = upper('APPROVED')
and rowid = :rowid
Last line = and rowid = 0
means rowid is 0
Regards
Aamir
Edited by: Aamir Mughal on Jun 2, 2012 10:22 PM -
Freight provision in purchase order
Hi,
I have 2 cases.
case1 the price in purchase info record is a lumpsum of material cost + freight
case2 the price in purchase info record is only material cost
May I know if case 1, I should provide for freight? I only need to provide for case 2 in purchase order, correct?
thanksHi Kunal,
Thanks alot.
If it is lumpsum (material cost + freight) maintained in PIR and i also have freight condition provided in purchase order, I thought this would be additionally accrual? and the differences will go to price difference if it is based on standard cost.
Kindly let me know if i understand correctly.
example
material cost + freight = $1000
when i have freight condition of 1%, then i will have $10 additional.
So I think if lumpsum then should not provide freight during purchase order.
Kindly advise.
Thanks -
Terms of Payment for Local and Import Purchase Order
Hello Experts,
I am SAP FICO Consultant, I am given a task of maintaining payment terms for local and import purchase order, I would highly appreciate your help in this regard. I know I can maintain payment terms via OBB8 but I am not sure that how to cover the following scenarios.
1. 100% Advance
2. 50% Advance, Balance in 07 Days (usually balance immediate with delivery is accepted but it is paid in 07 days for the record)
3. 25% Advance, Balance in 07 Days
4. 10% Advance, Balance in 07 Days
5. 30 Days Credit
6. 15 Days Credit
7. 07 Days Credit
IMPORTS
1. 100% Irrevocable LC in advance
2. 100% TT in Advance
3. 50% TT in advance & 50% before shipment.
Looking forward to hear from you.
Regards
Muhammad Yousuf AliHi
<b>All the Local as well as the R/3 data gets stored in the SRM tables ->
BBP_PAYTERM (Terms of Payment, Backend-Dependent)
BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT ( Texts for Terms of Payment, Backend-Dependent)
BBP_TQ02B ( QM System)
BBP_TQ02U (Description QM system)
Also refer to Transaction SLG1 for the log created in this case.</b>
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul -
Tables for credit Memo and Purchase order
Hi all,
I need to develop a report to dispaly all the credit memos for the open qty,
My issue that is there any table where we can have information for credit memos and purchase order,
like the input fields is company code,customer number,fiscal year,
hope you understnad,
Please let me know if you need any more information,
Thanks&Regards,
CghandHi
Invoice Verific. table:
RBKP - Document Header: Invoice Receipt
RSEG - Document Item: Incoming Invoice
Regards
Prasanna -
BAdI or USEREXIT for changing data of purchase order header - ME21N
hello all,
I would like to ask you any way to change the field "reason for change" of the Purchase Order header.
I tried implementing the method PROCESS_HEADER of IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
or changing reason_code of structure ekko in user exits EXIT_SAPMM06E_006 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
but it seems not to work.
How can i do?..
sap. v. ecc 6.0>
Shiva Kumar wrote:
> Use the user exit : EXIT_SAPMM06E_012: This is triggered on saving of a PO...and user can add validations etc in the exit...
> Cheers
It doesn't work...
>
Martin Voros wrote:
> you get reference to object IM_HEADER in method PROCESS_HEADER of BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST. On this object you can call two methods - GET_DATA and SET_DATA. GET_DATA returns structure with type MEPOHEADER. You can change your field here and then call method SET_DATA with your modified structure. This should work.
> Cheers
..same thing for this solution...
the field that i want to change is RSCOD inside structure EREVGRID...it seems to have also get_data and set_data methods ( IF_REVISION_ITEM_DCM ),
but I don't know which BAdI to implement that has a object type ref to EREVGRID...
Edited by: E_M on May 13, 2008 11:08 AM -
Missing Part list for Plant to Plant Purchase order
Hi,
I need the following requirement in CO24,
In CO24 its shows the missing parts for Sales order, similarly we want the missing parts list for Plant to Plant Purchase order in the same report. Also the report,
1.It should not consider the Planned order for a sales order.
2.It should not consider the planned order which can be convert into purchase requisition.
3.The procurement type should be "E" or "X".
Kindly guide me is there any standard layout changes in available or any development we have to do.
Thanks
Muthamil Murugan.GHi Purushothaman,
If you have the following settings in OPJK:
Plant XXXX
Order Type XXXX
Availability Check 2
[X]Status Check
[X]Check material availability when saving order (may not need)
Checking Rule PP PP checking rule
Component Check Type ATP check
Release material 2 Release permitted despite missing parts
Then in COHV you try to mass release the order with the following parameter:
List: Order Header
Selection: Your selection criteria
Mass processing:
Function: Release
Max. No.of Processes 99
Save Log: Always
Release control order: Collective Order Release
Then after the order is released, you can find the missing part list of that order in CO03 menu path:
Goto->Missing Parts->Missing parts list
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Rachel -
One inspection lot for multiple materials of purchase order line items
Hi All,
My client requirement is one inspection lot for multiple materials of purchase order line items.
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks in advance for early reply.
Regards,
JishuI totally agree with Amol.
I don't think I would touch that development nor would I ever tell a client it could reliably be done through development.
Knowing what I know about the table structures, I don't think you could create any development for this that could use a significant amount of the existing tables and functionality. I think you'd have to create all your own Z tables and basically rebuild the functionality. Tying it back in with SAP data will be difficult.
You're even looking at all custom screens for your results recording and UD as well. And if you have follow-on functions like batch classification requirements, batch determination, COA publication, results copy functions, use of DMR and sampling procedures, physical samples, quality notifications, etc. etc.. you could be looking a whole lot of development.
Craig -
SAP VB script for updating texts in purchase orders
Hello,
I am trying to create a SAP script for updating texts in purchase orders. It is in the last third - Item Detail, Texts tab.
The script is ok apart from the fact that it always deletes whatever text is in there and than add a new one.
I would like to keep history in the texts tab and always just add one line to existing texts. Is there any way (command) how
to keep existing texts and only add a new line to the top?
Thanks a lot!
JanYes, you are exactly right. I have already figured it out as well. I did not expect it would be that easy. But thanks a lot anyway for replying on this!
Now I am struggeling with changing SAPLMEGUI in vb scripts for ME22n. Sometimes, there is SAPLMEGUI:0010 and sometimes SAPLMEGUI:0015. Even when the users have the same screens in the beginning the SAPLMEGUI number differs. They also do one item by hand and than it changes. It keeps changing between SAPLMEGUI:0010 and SAPLMEGUI:0015
Is there a way how to have the same number of SAPLMEGUI or how to eliminate this issue?
Thanks a lot
Jan -
Can u tell me the tables for field Cross company Purchase Order.
Can u tell me the tables for field Cross company Purchase Order.
check below link...
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/500/Documentation/J53_BPP_EN_DE.doc -
Best Solution for Creating an Onlne Purchase order form with multiple calculation fields
I am a bit confused. Our school has a Forms Central account which works great for our registration forms but I need to find a solution for creating an online purchase form with multiple calculation fields - I know that forms central does not support calculation fields (too bad) but I know that Acrobat Pro does... soooo...
Can you create the forms in Acrobat and then somehow integrate the advanced features into forms central? Do they talk to each other? Is this easy to do? .... I guess another way to putting it is can you create the forms in Acrobat including all of the advanced features for payment calculation and then host it online using Forms Central to manage and collect the data? (I guess that really is my question)
Thanks (how does this compare to a solution like Formstack?)Hi, thanks.
The naming convention was the consistant up until a point when I read that you need a '.' syntax (?!) - does anyone know if this is true?
Attached is a version with Bernd Alheit's suggestion and with all the naming of the fields being consistant. It's still not working for me though after doing this and I'm stuck as to why, because I think it should work. I've also tried writing the calcualting line of code in the same manner that Bernd Alheit suggests before I came on here, and it wouldn't work then.
As with any coding, it must be something to which I have done, but I can't see it anywhere
Any ideas? Thanks for helping me
Cheers -
Hi,
In City of San Diego, the Non Deductable tax is required to be calculated on certain condition types and certain condition types do not attract the taxes.
Example
Suppose the pricing of material is as follows.
a. Gross Price PBXX - $100.00
b. Discount before tax %age (ZTDP) u2013 1% = $1.00
c. Taxable Fuel Surcharge (ZTFS) - $10.00
d. Hazardous Material fee - $10.00
In the example above the sum of a, b & c is taxable and d is non taxable.
Thus the total PO value should be calculated as below
Taxable Amount = $100-$1+$10 = $109.00. This value should be considered as the base value for condition BASB in tax schema TAXUSJ.
Tax say 7.775% = $8.45
Non Taxable Amount = $10.00
Total PO Amount would be = $109.00$8.45$10.00 = $127.45
The calculation schema is created according to this requirement (please refer the attachment). However, as per standard SAP, the tax is always calculated on the total of all the conditions.
So, in above example as per standard SAP tax would be calculated on $119.00 instead of $109.00
We have tried following options to address this issue
Option 1: Mark Non taxable conditions as Statistical in the calculation schema.
Issues with this optionu2013 This works fine as purchase order. However, as these conditions are statistical, the value of these conditions are not considered in net value calculation. Due to this the value of these conditions is not getting encumbered. This being public sector, the total PO price needs to get encumbered.
Option 2: Treat these conditions as some kind tax and create them with the tax category as u201CTaxu201D instead of Discount or Surcharges
Issue with this option: Though we knew that this is really not a best option we tried this. However, the values of these conditions do not get encumbered.
Option 3: Pass on subtotal of taxable amount to KOMP-KZWI6. Then in tax calculation schema TAXUSJ, maintain the routine 21 (KZWI6) for Alternate Formula for Condition Base value for condition type BASB (Base Amount).
The routine 21 is as follows
Pricing procedure subtotal 6
form frm_kond_basis_021.
xkwert = komp-kzwi6.
endform.
Though this should have been worked correctly, it is not working. System still calculates taxes on Total of all condition types
Option 4: Pass on subtotal amount to KOMP-KZWI6 and use BAdi EXTENSION_US_TAXES Method ME_TAXCOM_MEPO. The details of this BAdi are as enclosed with the message.
This logic is to route the program to a subtotal from KZWI6 instead of NETWR so that taxes are calculated only on the subtotal. This subtotal is carried over to field KOMP-KZWI6. System then picks up this subtotal and considers this as BASE amount in tax calculation schema for the calculation of tax.
Issue with this option: Though it works perfectly fine with single line PO, it does not work for multi line PO. At the time of PO creation, it calculates the taxes correctly. However, during saving of the PO, it changes the taxes. The taxes after saving are totally different and sometimes randomly calculated. The behavior is un-predictable. However, sometimes it works correctly. In some cases, it changes the tax amounts randomly (tax amount of line 1 will be shown to line 10 and that of line 10 will be shown in line 8).
The details of Calculation Schema and Tax Schema are as enclosed with this message.
Calculation Schema
1 1 ZPB0 CoSD Gross Price 0 0 9
1 2 PBXX Gross Price 0 0 9
3 1 ZTDQ Discount Bf Tax Qty 1 0 b
3 2 ZTDV Discount Bf Tax Valu 1 0 b
3 3 ZTDP Discount Bf Tax %age 1 0 b
4 1 ZTFV Txbl Value Freight 1 0 b
4 2 ZTFQ Txbl Qty Freight 1 0 b
4 3 ZTFP Txbl %age freight 1 0 b
5 0 ZTFS Txbl Fuel Surcharge 1 0 b
20 0 Net value incl. disc. 1 5 6
21 1 NAVS Non-Deductible Tax 0 0 b
21 2 NAVM Non-Deductible Tax 0 0 b
22 0 Net value incl. tax 20 21
25 1 ZNDQ Discount Af Tax Qty 1 0 b
25 2 ZNDV Discount Af Tax Valu 1 0 b
25 3 ZNDP Discount Af Tax %age 1 0 b
26 1 ZCTQ CA Tire Fee Qty 1 0 b
26 2 ZCTV CA Tire Fee Value 1 0 b
31 1 ZNFV N Txbl Value Freight 1 0 b
31 2 ZNFQ N Txbl Qty Freight 1 0 b
31 3 ZNFP N Txbl %age freight 1 0 b
32 1 ZNFS N Txbl Fuel Surcharg 1 0 b
33 0 ZHMF Hazardous Matl Fee 0 0 b
34 0 ZMSC Misc Fee Value 0 0 b
35 1 SKTO Cash Discount 1 0
40 0 Actual price 22 39 S
60 0 WOTB OTB Procurement 0 0
70 0 GRWR Statistical Value 20 0
75 0 GWLB Stat. Val. LB-Comp. 0 0
79 0 Border crossing value 70 78 C
Tax Schema TAXUSJ
100 0 BASB Base Amount 0 0 0 0 0
120 0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0
200 0 Distributed to G/L 100 110 0 0 0
210 0 JP1I A/P Sales Tax 1 Inv. 120 0 00 0 NVV
220 0 JP2I A/P Sales Tax 2 Inv. 120 0 0 0 0 NVV
230 0 JP3I A/P Sales Tax 3 Inv. 120 0 0 0 0 NVV
240 0 JP4I A/P Sales Tax 4 Inv. 120 0 0 0 0 NVV
300 0 Expensed 0 0 0 0 0
310 0 JP1E A/P Sales Tax 1 Exp. 120 0 0 0 0 VS1
320 0 JP2E A/P Sales Tax 2 Exp. 120 0 0 0 0 VS2
330 0 JP3E A/P Sales Tax 3 Exp. 120 0 0 0 0 VS3
340 0 JP4E A/P Sales Tax 4 Exp. 120 0 0 0 0 VS4
400 0 Self-assessment 0 0 0 0 0
410 0 JP1U A/P Sales Tax 1 Use 210 0 0 0 0 MW1
420 0 JP2U A/P Sales Tax 2 Use 220 0 0 0 0 MW2
430 0 JP3U A/P Sales Tax 3 Use 230 0 0 0 0 MW3
440 0 JP4U A/P Sales Tax 4 Use 240 0 0 0 0 MW4
500 0 Accrued 0 0 0 0 0
510 0 JR1 A/R Sales Tax 1 120 0 0 0 0 MW1
520 0 JR2 A/R Sales Tax 2 120 0 0 0 0 MW2
530 0 JR3 A/R Sales Tax 3 120 0 0 0 0 MW3
540 0 JR4 A/R Sales Tax 4 120 0 0 0 0 MW4Hello,
can u make it more simple & understandable i.e in 8-10 lines.
u have written a lot & much confusing way.
JP -
How to Enable Delta for a Custom MM Purchase Order History ODS ???
Hi all,
We have a Customized MM Purchase Order History ODS with Full Update on Monthly basis. We want to enable the DELTA for this ODS and how can I proceed, PLEASE.
Please find the Key Figures and Data Fields in the below:
ODS Structure for PO History ODS:
Key Fields
SAP R/3 Field Description Technical Name
Purchasing Document Number EKBE-EBELN
Purchasing Line Item Number EKBE-EBELP
Sequential number of account assignment EKBE-ZEKKN
Transaction/event type, purchase order history EKBE-VGABE
FI Fiscal Period FISCPER (from BKPF-GJAHR + BKPF-MONAT) in the format YYYYPPPP
Number of Material Document EKBE-BELNR
Item in Material Document EKBE-BUZEI
Data Fields
SAP R/3 Field Description Technical Name
Company Code EKKO-BUKRS
Plant EKPO-EWERK
Account Number of the Vendor EKKO-LIFNR
Currency Key (of PO) EKKO-WAERS
Deletion indicator in purchasing document EKPO-LOEKZ
Purchasing Document Date EKKO-BEDAT
Responsible salesperson at vendor's office EKKO-VERKF
Vendor's telephone number EKKO-TELF1
Incoterms (part 1) EKKO-INCO1
Incoterms (part 2) EKKO-INCO2
Short text EKPO-TXZ01
Material Group EKPO-MATKL
Material Number used by Vendor EKPO-IDNLF
Expected Delivery Date EKET-EINDT
Order unit (UOM) EKPO-BSTME
Delivery Completed Indicator EKPO-ELIKZ
Account assignment category EKPO-KNTTP
Business Area (from PO) EKKN-GSBER
Name of requisitioner/requester EKPO-AFNAM
Purchasing organization EKKO-EKORG
Purchasing group EKKO-BKGRP
G/L Account Number (from PO) EKKN-SAKTO
Cost Center (from PO) EKKN-KOSTL
Work Breakdown Structure Element (WBS Element) EKKN-PS_PSP_PNR
Payment Terms (from PO) EKKO-ZTERM
PO History Category EKBE-BEWTP
Movement Type EKBE-BWART, MSEG-BWART
Debit/Credit Indicator EKBE-SHKZG
Reference from Invoice RBKP-XBLNR
Payment Terms (from Invoice) RBKP-ZTERM
Posting Date RBKP-BUDAT for IR, MKPF-BLDAT for GR
Document Date RBKP-BLDAT for Invoice, MKPF-BLDAT for GR
Baseline Date RBKP-ZFBDT
FI Document Number BKPF-BELNR, found through BKPF-AWKEY (IR # or GR # + fiscal year) or MSEG-LFBNR
FI Dcoument Year BKPF-GJAHR
FI Document Type BKPF-BLART
Fiscal Variant Hardcoded: S4
Payment Method (invoice header level) RBKP-ZLSCH
GL Account (from GR/IR document) MSEG-SAKTO for GR, DRSEG-SAKNR for IR (DRSEG is a structure)
Cost Cener (from GR/IR document) MSEG-KOSTL for GR, DRSEG-KOSTL (DRSEG is a structure) for IR
Business Area (from GR/IR document) MSEG-PARGB; not sure on IR
Local Currency BKPF-HWAE
Local Currency 2 BKPF-HWAE2
Amount posted to GR/IR Clearing (LC) EKBE-AREWR
Amount posted to GR/IR Clearing (GC) EKBE-AREWR converted to Group Currecny found through BKPF-KURS2 if BKPF-HWAE2 is USD
Purchase order quantity EKPO-BSTMG
Price Unit (for PO) EKPO-PEINH
Net price in purchasing document (in document currency) EKPO-BPREI
Amount in local currency; amount in document currency MSEG-DMBTR for material document, RSEG-WRBTR for invoice
Amount in local currency; amount in document currency (GC) MSEG-DMBTR for material document,
RSEG-WRBTR for invoice converted to USD
Quantity MSEG-ERFMG for material document;
RSEG-MENGE for Invoice
Delivery costs' share of item value RSEG-BNKAN
Delivery costs' share of item value (GC)RSEG-BNKAN converted to USD
Tax Amount (accrued) BSEG-PSWBT
Freight Amount (accrued) BSEG-PSWBT
Discount Amount (invoice header level) RBKP-WSKTO
Thanks.Hi Venkat,
If you are using a Custom DataSource/Extractor the main problem is that you are collecting data from a lot of tables, so it is really difficult to determine a field for the delta.
If for you is important only a change at Key Fields Table (EKBE) you can set the Generic Delta only on a field of this table (Doc Number or Position Number - Date - Timestamp).
But if you are interested in all changes you have to determine a single field for every tables...
I think it is really difficult to find a delta in all these tables.
Maybe you can think to use in BW an ODS without Reporting BEx flag to determine Delta, and then introduce delta records in a Cube.
Ciao.
Riccardo. -
Condition type for deduction in service purchase order
Hi All,
Our client has scenario where in transport service Purchase order, client wants to deduct some part of amount as a security fund.
E.g client takes transport service from vendor amounting Rs. 1000 and client deducts Rs. 10 as a security fund so payment to vendor is Rs. 990. This deduction amount should go to separate GL.
Kindly let me know how can we map this scenario? I guess we can do this with the help of condition type but dont know from where to start and what will be the nature of condition type.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Nisha.Hi
What client is going to do with security deposit? Do they settle over a period of time?
Based on that you can do the config setting.
Case 1) Retaining of security deposit.
If client is not paying back and wants to keep the security deposit. They Wants to have track record of the same. Then you can use Z condition type by copying R002 discount using M/06 and assign GL in OBYC for that condition type.
Case 2) paying back security:
Create Z condition type by copying any freight condition and assign GL in OBYC
While creating PO use condition type.
While repayment of security deposit FI will use same GL as Db and vendor account as Cr using F-44.
Rgs -
Freight conditions in purchase orders
Ladies and Gentlemen, I am trying to set up a freight condition that allows for freight charges we deal with to be divided up by dollar amounts instead of percentage or by the quantities involved. Is there a way to configure the condition to allocate freight chargers to each line item based on the dollar amount?
example:
line one is for 1 ea at 5 dollars
line two is for 5 ea at 10 dollars
input freight condition for a charge of 20 dollars where 5 dollars goes to line 1 and 15 goes to line 2 in the detailed section.
Thanks,
JeffHello Lakshmipathi,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
I understand the VKOA & OB40 settings.
But the issue here is that I can see Tax Codes & GL Account in Sales Order for Condition Types which are marked as "Prices" & "Discount & Surcharge" in V/06. Now the Basic understanding & experience I have always had was that while creating Condition Records (VK11), system will ask for Tax Codes only for Condition Types that are marked as "Taxes" in V/06.
But in my case in VK11 for Basic & Discount Condition type there is no Tax Code, but in Sales Order, Tax Code & GL account is visible against these Basic & Discount Condition Types.
Hope I have put up the question clearly...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do i get the firefox button to appear (top left corner) ??
i have downloaded the newest version of firefox on my work computer... the new firefox button in the top left corner does not appear... how do i get it ??? ....i have firefox on all other (home) computers & its there on all of them !!! firefox is awe
-
Hard drive failure, new hard drive won't boot
Toshiba Satellite A665 I bought this laptop 14 months ago, last month the laptop refused to boot. It would say: Isolinux disk error 05, ax4250, drive 9f Boot failed Often times on boot it would just show the black screen with a blinking underscore. I
-
Hi, I have a JMS to idoc scenario wherein I will get the source structure as follows: 10aaaaaaaaaa 75bbbbbbbbbb 76aaaaaaaaaa 76aaaaaaaaaa 76aaaaaaaaaa 75bbbbbbbbbb 76aaaaaaaaaa 76aaaaaaaaaa 76aaaaaaaaaa 99 here FileHeader starts with 10 TransactionHe
-
Want to use credit card with firefox but do not see a lock with firefox 5 on linux using priceline
want to use credit card with firefox but do not see a lock with firefox 5 on linux using priceline
-
Integrated ITS in a Separate App Server (DI) for Security and LoadBalancing
Hi Experts, I have a specific requirement for ITS Configuration. 1. Production Server ( CI + DB ) -> Existing [ ERP6.0 ] OS : Solaris 10 DB : oracle 10.2.0.2 H/W: PRIMEPOWER650 Unicode Enabled 2. Application Server ( DI ) --> to be made ( and to be u