Re: Distribution

you cannot distribute Flash Lite 2.1.
you can create a cab file installer for your swf and other
assets. The end
user will need to install your cab file and the Flash LIte
2.1 player in
seperate steps.
You might "tune in" to Part 3: Creating your own installers
for the phone -
Weyert de Boer, which will cover how to make a .cab file.
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/event/index.cfm?event=detail&id=546041&loc=en_us

Hi sun deep,
1. u can check the table SOID
regards,
amit m.

Similar Messages

How to send spool to Distribution List using JOB_CLOSE

Please help on sending Distribution list when job defined using JOB_OPEN, JOB_Submit and JOB_CLOSE
Thanks.

Hi, this is code:
DATA WA_RECIPIENT LIKE swotobjid.
CONSTANTS: gc_objname TYPE oj_name    VALUE 'RECIPIENT'.
PERFORM get_distribucion_list USING    'NAME_LIST'   " name of List of distribution
                              CHANGING WA_RECIPIENT.
CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_CLOSE'
EXPORTING
      jobcount                          = l_jobcount
      jobname                           = l_jobname
      strtimmed                         = 'X'
    recipient_obj                     = wa_recipient
IMPORTING
   job_was_released                  = l_libero
EXCEPTIONS
   cant_start_immediate              = 1
   invalid_startdate                 = 2
   jobname_missing                   = 3
   job_close_failed                  = 4
   job_nosteps                       = 5
   job_notex                         = 6
   lock_failed                       = 7
   OTHERS                            = 8.
FORM get_distribucion_list USING    p_objnam       TYPE so_obj_nam
                           CHANGING p_wa_recipient LIKE swotobjid.
DATA: it_tab LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF soxdl
               INITIAL SIZE 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
CHECK NOT p_objnam IS INITIAL.
CALL FUNCTION 'SO_DLI_LIST_READ_XDL'
    EXPORTING
      dli_generic_name            = p_objnam
      public                      = 'X'
      subscript                   = 'X'
    TABLES
      dli_display_tab             = it_tab
    EXCEPTIONS
      communication_failure       = 1
      dl_list_no_entries          = 2
      owner_not_exist             = 3
      system_failure              = 4
      x_error                     = 5
      parameter_error             = 6
      OTHERS                      = 7
IF sy-subrc = 0.
    READ TABLE it_tab INDEX 1.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      CALL FUNCTION 'OWN_LOGICAL_SYSTEM_GET'
        IMPORTING
          own_logical_system             = p_wa_recipient-logsys
        EXCEPTIONS
          own_logical_system_not_defined = 1
          OTHERS                         = 2.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
        MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
      ENDIF.
      MOVE gc_objname TO p_wa_recipient-objtype.
      CONCATENATE it_tab-dlitp it_tab-dliyr it_tab-dlino
                  INTO p_wa_recipient-objkey.
    ENDIF.
ELSE.
    MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
            WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.

How can I create a Teststand (1.0.3 or 2.0) distribution without having all of the VIs (6.0.2 or 6.1) in the same directory?

How would I create a Teststand distribution of LabVIEW VIs and maintain the test VI directory structure that I want?
I know that I have to use the application builder to build the custom operator interface, configure it as an ActiveX server, and launch the Teststand engine installation.
The only problem that I have is using the VI packager which puts all of the test code and sequences in a single directory.
This gets quite messy. There are just over 1000 files in the neatly orgainzed directory structure that I have now. (this includes support files, dll's and such)
I have read brief appnotes on configuring the ini file(s) to use
the vi search path that I want, but have not been able to get this to work. Maybe I'm not updating the correct ini? or have to include each subdirectory?
I have currently upgraded from LabVIEW 6.0.2 to 6.1
I am currently using Teststand 1.0.3
I have not upgraded to Teststand 2.0 yet because I have not decided if I want to build at this revision or go through the extra work to mass compile Teststand at LabVIEW 6.1, install the LabVIEW 6i VI Packager Fix, and update the new Teststand LV operator interface with my changes.
At present, I'm not getting the results I want and am quickly running out of time. I have to deliver the project by the 14th of July 2002.
Sorry for the long question and thanks for you help.

Hi,
I dont think the problem is really related to using the VI Packager but more to how the OI interface applications relates to labVIEW File constants.
If you are using the LabVIEW as the ActiveX Server then there should be no problems. But if you are using the Runtime LabVIEW server such as 'TestStandLVRTS' then the file constant would return different paths.
eg for the Default Path you would get 'C:\TestStand\Components\User\RuntimeServers\LabVIEW' instead of 'c:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW'.
Attacted is an example to show how to change these paths when using your runtime server. Unzip this into your teststand examples folder
Put the INI file in the location of the \user\runtimeservers\labview folder.
Change the labview adapter t
o use TestStandLVRTS.exe. You can run the example sequence from either the OI or seqeditor.
I hope this helps
Regards
Ray Farmer
Regards
Ray Farmer
Attachments:
UsingLVOI.zip ‏20 KB

Cannot find the Recv Logical system in Distribution Model

HI experts,
Im triying a Idoc to file scenario, the logical system for PI and R3 has been already created and assinged for the appropriate clients.
and i ve created the port from r3 using tcode we21 and in PI using idx1 and Idx2. The RFC destination also created for PI and R3 system.. when i created the distribution model using BD64 in R2. when i assigning message type i can give the source logical system and i cant find the Receiver logical system... Also in WE19 i cant find the receiver port (which i created in IDX1 and IDX2)..
Could u tell me how to solve this prob???
Regards
Balaji

Hii Ravi,
Thanks for your reply,
Yes i have created the port (RFC800) idx1 and give RFC destination which points the R3 system.
I have assigned the meta data to that port using tcode idx2.
And I have created port with port name "PORT800" in R3 using we21 and give the RFC destination which points the PI system
when im using the WE19... i gave source logical system as R3 Logical system and receiver logical system as PI Logical system.
now im getting error like "PORT RFC800 DOESNT EXIT IN THE THE TABLE OF PORT DISCRIPTIONS".
Regards,
Balaji
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 25, 2009 9:32 AM
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 25, 2009 9:32 AM

Runtime error in distribution FM 'CVV5_EVENT_START_DISTRIBUTION'

Dear All,
I am facing an issue in document distribution. Business scenario: PR is created with a doument. PR goes through a release strategy which is designed through a Workflow. When PR is finally approved, Documnet distribution happens. Business object DRAW is called with event CHANGED and hence this FM CVV5_EVENT_START_DISTRIBUTION is called. However this results in a runtime error due to exception 'NO_RELATION_EXIST'. I am not able to debug and find if any necessary parameter is getting missed and i do not have too much information on DMS.
Can somebody guide me in resolving this issue. If any other information is needed then please post it.
Thanking you in advance.
Regards,
Saud

Thnaks a lot. That note is explicitly for this problem. I will take it forward now. Will revert back in case of any issue. Thanks again.
Regards,
Saud

Private app distribution: dev version / testflight / adobe content viewer / b2b distribution

Hi Adobe Community!
I am finalizing an app for my company that is supposed to be distributed only among our distributors. Apple rejected my Enterprise inquiry since our distributors are not our employees. I wanted to sum up my distribution options now and ask you for feedback. I do not plan to use App Store.
1. B2B distribution through apple
I can distribute custom b2b app through Apple, but it is available only in few european countries and this does not cover our needs since we cannot supply to all distributors. Also the process looks very complicated and I'd like to not use it.
2. Adobe Content Viewer distribution
If I tell my customers to download Adobe Content Viewer and sign in with my Adobe ID, the newest version of folios will be automatically downloaded to their devices?
Also on Adobe website it is stated that my folios should be automatically uploaded to Adobe servers - but they are not. From what I read on the forums I understood that it is only available to Creative Cloud subscribers, is it right? If I subscribe will I be able to use this way for as many users I want?
3. Developer version
Finally I know that I can distribute dev version. I will have to register devices UDIDs but they will expire (after what time?) and how many UDIDs can I register (I read in different places that I can have 50 or 100 testers).
4. TestFlight
What I undestood so far is that facilitates developeloper version distribution, but wouldn't I be able to use this tool to go around UDIDs expiration?
Thank a lot!

With DPS enterprise and Apple enterprise account, you can built and deploy enterprised signed app internally within your organisation. Create the app, deploy and host it internally, so anyone who has access to the link can download the app. Not sure if Apple terms allows your distributors from outside your organisation to access and download the app hosted internally within your organisation, check that with Apple.
If Apple terms does not allow, then you can use DPS restricted distribution method to deploy the app on the Appstore, but allow someone access to the content only if they are authenticated via the app, called direct entitlement or restricted distribution. Go here for details: Using restricted distribution with Digital Publishing Suite
Signing in to ACV does not automatically download the latest folio. Your folios are always uploaded on Adobe servers, you cannot host it somewhre else. Anyone can create, upload folios and see the folio in the Adobe Content Viewer. But publishing the folio to be available in an app requires DPS subscription.
You can register upto 100 UDID's on Apple dev portal. I don't think the UDID's expires so long as your Apple Dev account is active but the certificates expires exactly one year from the day it was generated.

Ad Hoc distribution under Enterprise license

Hi,
I have a customer who's workforce has a 1,000 iPads and is interested in distributing their publications either Ad-Hoc or through Internal Distribution, without going through the Apple Store. Are there any issues, limitations using the Enterprise License with Adobe DPS?
I understand Apple has a 100 unit limit on Ad-Hoc using the Developer License.
Tony

Apple has a 100 device limit per provisioning profile for ad hoc distribution. It's a cumbersome method at best and won't scale easily to 1000 ipads.
The correct solution for this type of desired behaviour is an Apple Enterprise license and DPS. This will let you build an app that can be distributed outside the Apple app store, to your employees only. Depending on theneed to control the level of access to content, folios can either published as public free ( controlling access by controlling the app distribution) or published as public/retail using the direct entitlement APIs to provide login level access to the folio within the app.

Public distribution of iPad app, but not in Apple's App Store

I know we can make a Digital Publishing Suite app avalable for private distribution with an Adobe Enterprise account and an Apple Enterprise account.
But we have a client who wants to make an app available to the public for download on a company web page, but not have it available in the Apple App Store.
Is that even possible?
Dave

No.
Neil

Cannot assign an email address to SharePoint group (distribution groups)

Hello,
I configured incoming email awhile back in our SharePoint 2010 environment and it works great. I can assign an email address to a list and the necessary contact is created in AD in the OU I configured for incoming email and of course the item emailed in
is added to the list. However, if I try to assign an email address to a SharePoint group to create a distribution group, the following happens:
The following error has occurred while attempting to contact the Directory Management Service: The request failed with HTTP status 401: Unauthorized.
From what I've found on Technet and other resources, if incoming email works as expected, assign an email address to a group should work without issue but this obviously isn't the case. I've dug around in the 14 hive and pretty much the same exact error
is found there (with just a little more detail):
System.Net.WebException: The request failed with HTTP status 401: Unauthorized.
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.ReadResponse(SoapClientMessage message, WebResponse response, Stream responseStream, Boolean asyncCall)
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] parameters)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.DirectorySoap.SPDirectoryManagementProxy.CreateDistributionGroup(String Alias, String Name, String Description, String ContactCN, RequestInfo Info, DistributionGroupFlags Flags)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGroup.CreateDMS(String dlAlias, String friendlyName, String description, String[] members, String requestor, String justification, Int32& jobId)
Any ideas what this could be? I'd imagine the timer service account has the appropriate permission on the OU as it can create objects for lists with incoming email enabled without issue.

For the issue with group members who are not added during the creation process ...
I followed this Technet article : Configure
incoming email for a SharePoint 2013 farm
But in the paragraph "Configure AD DS to be used with Directory Management Service", I added
delegation of control for the following common tasks :
Create, delete and manage groups
Modify the membership of a group
The distribution group gets created in AD with members in SharePoint 2013 ! It should work with 2010 as well…
PS : Do not forget to set up these rights, not only for the Central Administration Application pool Identity account, but for all
your Web Applications!

Creating distribution lists in SAP CRM 5.0 business workplace

Hi Experts,
We have CRM 5.0 and I have tried to create distribution lists for
mailsending.
After defining a name and a folder (that is then created) for the
list the recipient list insertion is a following task.
I can search for partners of different type by F4 help but no
matter the type of the partner searched - the type that is
automatically entered to the lists recipents table is "shared
distribution list". even though the desired type is among others
in a list other values cannot be selected.
Please help, is this a setting that can be undone or what might
be a problem in the procedure that i use in creating a list?
has anyone else had similar problems?
Thank You so much,

i have received an answer from SAP:
"The reason for the error is a wrong entry in table TBCS_RECIP. To removethis entry, please use the report which is entered in the description
of note 735795 or delete the wrong entry direct on table TBCS_RECIP.
After the run of the report or the deletion on table TBCS_RECIP you willnot find further the selection option 'Business Partner' on the F4 help."
The entry was removed and for Lists business partners cannot be selected at all - as a standard. really sad endeed.

What is difference between distribution list and share point group? Can we add distribution list into person and group column of share point list?

what is difference between distribution list and share point group? Can we add distribution list into person and group column of share point list?

there is a workaround you can try, create audience and add DL to them and deal with the audience or convert DL to groups
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/02f0d773-8188-4d94-a448-0c04d838b0cf/distribution-lists-in-sharepoint?forum=sharepointgenerallegacy
Kind Regards,
John Naguib
Technical Consultant/Architect
MCITP, MCPD, MCTS, MCT, TOGAF 9 Foundation
Please remember to mark your question as answered if this solves your problem

Failure of a single article prevents the distribution of all articles in a publication to a subscriber

We have a SQL Server 2012 R2 SP2 environment and Transactional Replication configured with 1 instance publishing all tables in a database via a single publication (circa 150 articles in the one publication). We have a separate distribution instance,
and a third subscription instance. All articles in the publication are configured to copy all data, with no advanced filtering configured. It is also noted that Alerts were not configured in Replication Monitor.
We had an issue whereby, inexplicably, a table on the subscriber vanished (I use this term because I could not find any record in the log file of a DELETE statement being issued against that table - regrettably I wasn't in the position to query the distribution
database for any such commands either).
In Replication monitor we saw that the article for the table in question was failing, but no others.
The issue was that no other articles were being replicated to the subscriber, and this was evident via stalled rowcounts on the subscriber database, but increasing rowcounts on the publishing database.
When we removed the offending article from the publication, all other articles started getting applied to the subscriber database - and we could observe both publication and subscription rowcounts increasing in lockstep.
My questions are:
1) in a single publication with many articles, are the articles applied to the subscription in a single batch - meaning that if a discreet transaction for one article fails, that all other articles will be rolled back with this transaction until it
is cleared.
2) Why would Replication Monitor not start showing widespread warnings for every other table (article) that was not successfully being replicated to the subscriber?
3) Aside from configuring alerts in Replication Monitor (which has happened already) and a bespoke rowcount checking 'monitor', how could Transactional Replication be configured so that the failure of the publication of an obscure article doesn't fail all
articles --> I note that creating multiple publications with smaller number of articles would limit the exposure, but from what I've observed, this would only limit the exposure to those articles in the same publication.
Many thnaks

1) they could be - it all depends on the batch size.
2) I suspect because the distribution agent applies the changes serially, ie one article after another in the order the changes occurred on the publisher. So if it fails on one table it will not continue until this error is leared.
3) use the continue on data consistency error profile, or put your problem article in its own publication.
looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Administration?
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Server-2008-Management-Administration/dp/067233044X looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Full-Text Search?
http://www.amazon.com/Pro-Full-Text-Search-Server-2008/dp/1430215941

No 'Sales and Distribution-data' in COMMPR01

Hi All,
I've download products from R/3 to CRM and eveything worked out fine, except the following: I don't see any 'tuples' assigned in the 'Sales and Distribution-tab' in COMMPR01. There is also no possibility to assign a tuple in this tab, because the button for 'assigning' is greyed out and I don't want to assign a tuple for every product manually.
Before downloading the products, I've created a org. chart which seems to be fine. In this org chart you can see the correct sales organization and distribution channel. Besides that: 'Obj. Permitted in Determination' is checked.
Can somebody help me with this issue? So how do I incorporate a tuple in the 'Sales and Distribution-tab'?
Kind regards,
Maarten.

Hi Maarten,
Please check the following:
- The value for attribute Tuple(distribution channel,division) in Attributes tab of scenario SALES is not maintained for transaction PPOMA_CRM (Maintain Organizational Model)
Also, the problem might be the buffer is not getting updated.
Please check the following steps in your system.
1.Check flag 'Obj. Permitted in Determination' checked on the attribute
tab in TA PPOMA_CRM for the organization Unit in question
2.Check the buffering for SALES/SERVICE is switched ON in table T77OMATTR
3.Report HRBCI_ATTRIBUTES_BUFFER_UPDATE be executed on a
regular basis -> Please see documentation of this report
I hope, this helps you.
regards
Srikantan

KE28 Top-down distribution for only part of the Value Field

Hi Experts,
We have a situation where we will make manual postings in CO-PA through KE21N. Part of this postings will be at the lowest detailed level and part will be for a more summarized level od characteristics. All the postings will flow to the same value field.
We need to make a top-down distribution only for the postings that were made in a summarized level, because the other postings already have the details that we need.
Is it possible?
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Hi Venkata,
Please note that :-
you can not distribute to a characteristic that already contains a
value. Please see note 77476. If you want to distribute to eg.
profit center, then the characteristic must be initial (in the data
to be distributed).
In the case where the log showed "number of receivers" but no line
written is a common problem in transaction KE28 logged by customers.
One example is that, if the amount of line items is 0.00 for all the
receivers, no line item will be written.
No values in reference data:
If there are no values in reference data for some segments (see the
log). No records are posted (segments which were distributed, but
their value is zero i.e. there is no value to be distributed, are not
posted).
No initial values in the distribution level (ie. # - non assigned)
in each of the characteristics in distribution level.
Kind Regards,
Abhisek Patnaik,

In the upgrade to Yosemite, the distribution list feature in mail appears to have been eliminated. Any suggestions?

Prior to upgrading to Yosemite, mail allowed you to select all from a contact group and paste the e-mail address of the group to an e-mail send field. This "distribution list" feature does not seem to work in this new system. Any suggestions?

You can see a detailed comparison between MobileMe and iCloud, plus general information and some links to Apple Help pages, here:
http://rfwilmut.net/icloud
Question 2 would be best asked as an individual question in the hope of attracting the attention of someone who is in the same situation and can give you a practical answer: question 3 would best be asked in the iPhone forum.

Setting up Contacts "groups" or "distribution lists" on Treo Pro??

Is there any way to set up a "group" or "distribution list" on Treo Pro w/ Windows Mobile so that I can send a text message to a group rather than have to put in each phone number individually???
Post relates to: Treo Pro T850U (Unlocked)

Hello!
Windows Mobile devices doe not have this function at least out straight foward of the box, will require the use of a 3rd-party SMS application. PalmOS smartphones have an upping here with its templates folder but in your case you could try making SMS drafts and use those as a "group template."
Post relates to: Treo 650 (Unlocked GSM)

Re: Distribution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for