RE: During MIRO

Hi All,
I am FI consutant, please can anyone tell me the below issue.
During MIRO system can be processed double invoices with warning message. i want system to give error message how and where do have to set this one
Points will be assigned
thanks in advace.

HI,
Maintain the messages in Logistics invoice verification,
SPRO>>MM>>LOGISTICS INVOICE VERIFICATION>>Define Attributes of System Messages
Click on system messages , here you assign 108 message through new entries and in next field enter either error or warning message.
Regards,
Andra.

Similar Messages

  • Using BADI for changing the Profit Center in FI Document during MIRO

    Hi,
    We have an requirement of changing the profit center in FI/CO Document while doing MIRO which is different than the one which is posted at the time MIGO.The system is not allowing us to do this and the field profit center during MIRO is not changeble mode and the business requirement is to change this through any SAP enhancements or program.
    How can I do this ?
    Is there is any standard BADI or User Exit is available for this.
    Pleease help me in this and will give valuable points.

    Hey,
    Use the BADI INVOICE_UPDATE and try with this. Otherwise you try to create Enhancement point to implement your code.
    Note: Inside BADI we can't change the runtime value. So, try to use enhancement point.
    Rewert back for any clarification.
    Regards,
    Saravanan M

  • Vendor downpayment/advance adjust during MIRO

    Dear Expats
    Our SAP version is E 6.0  EHP 4.0
    In our existing system there is no PUSH button available to clear the down payment amount with vendor invoice.
    Pls. give the feedback, how can we activate this option to clear the down payment during MIRO
    Regards
    Tarek

    Dear Expats
    After activating the business function LOG_MMFI_P2P
    We have implemented one note also for execute button
    Note : 1610785
    Still we are not getting the
    1) Execute button in ME2DP T code
    2) down payment clearing Tab in MIRO
    In Standard operation
    In our system
    Regards
    Tarek H Chy

  • Exchange Rate difference posting during MIRO posting

    Hi ,
    We are facing an issue for exchange rate difference posting during MIRO.
    PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date. Vendor in PO has different currency than company code currency. Exchange rate maintained in OB08 for this period is taken in PO.
    PO value & GR value is same. Due to raw material cost there was price difference posted during GR posting.
    (i.e. Raw material cost - GR/IR value = Price difference amount)
    During posting MIGO, 3 accounts got posted.
    Raw material cost account got debited & offset credit to GR/IR account & price difference account (in vendor & company code currency also)
    During posting MIRO, 4 accounts got posted.
    Vendor account got credited with GR/IR amount & offset to GR/IR account debit.
    Exchange rate difference account got credited & offset to price difference account (in company code currency only)
    Since PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date, then why system has posted exchange rate difference account in local currency only during MIRO posting ?
    Your inputs appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi,
    there is a setting in configuration of logistics invoice verification where you can control the calculation and posting of exchange rate differences. If you had the setting active that exchange rate differences are calculated against a planned exchange rate, that might lead to the kind of postings you describe. Please check.
    best regards,   Udo

  • Error during MIRO for tax code .

    Dear All ,
                            User is doing MIRO but an error comes as " Tax code V0 does not exist in TAXINN " , here i need to tell u that what had happened that in P.O the material is not charged  with any tax , so user have given tax code as V0 , but he had forgotten to maintain cond for BED non cenvatable %  so he had made the cond. record in FV11 , Here my querry is that during MIRO the tax code V0 without cond record gives error from where the system is not capable to fetch the data ?
    OR is there any check so that in such cond. the error should be like this " No cond record is maintained for V0." instaed of
    " Tax code V0 does not existsin TAXINN "
    Rgds
    sap12

    U need the user should assign tax code V0 for non-taxable materials.
    Error what it giving is correct. U should assign this V0 to ur tax Procedure TAXINN.
    Path to Assign
    Spro - IMG - Financial Accounting(New) - FA Global settings - Tax on Sales/ Purchase - Calculation - Taxcodes for Tax-Excempt Sales.
    Procedure - TaxCode - Reason
    If ur not able to solve the problem, Send me ur requrement clearly.
    Subramanian.R

  • More than one Bank a/c during MIRO.

    Hi
    The vendor is having more than one bank accounts. By default during MIRO the system is taking a particular account all times.
    I want the system to warn me that more than one Bank a/c is available for the vendor. How to set this?
    Thanks
    Ramprakash.P

    Hi,
    When you have different banks maintained in your vendor master for the
    same vendor, maitain the field 'Partner Bank Type'
    (LFBK-BVTYP) with different identifiers A, B and C to identify different
    bank accounts.
    Later when you do IV in MIRO, Enter the POI / Vendor and
    go over to the tab 'Payment' and choose the appropriate 'Part. Bank'
    from the drop-down (just below the payment method field). This would
    show you the available bank accounts A, B or C.
    Cheers
    Dheeraj
    **points if useful

  • Problem in VAT Round off during MIRO

    Hi Friends,
    I having problem in VAT round off during MIRO. We have created PO with excise +VAT. VAT amount has been rounded off. After GRN, we are trying to post the Invoice in MIRO, the VAT amount shows with Decimal.
    We are using TAXINN, in the tax pricing proceedure i have mede 17 for call type for VAT condition type. in OB90 we have mede the rounding rule as 100 for currency INR.
    When i create the FI direct invoice using the same Tax code it works fine, but having problem in MIRO. I want the decimal should be rounded to the nearest value.
    Can any one help me is there any standard set up where we can arrive this?? OR is it required any user exit??
    Regards,
    Deva

    Check whether you can use the user exit function module KR_USER_EXIT_ROUNDOFF
    Regards,
    SDNer

  • Re: Freight Cost during MIRO

    Dear All,
    Need help...I configured the following steps in order to capture freight cost during MIRO. but during MIRO,
      the GL account captured/defaulted  to freight cost  is same as the  expense accnt instead of the freight cost account..
    eg. Expense -1111
          Freight   -2222
          Vendor  - 3333
    Created  1 PO and maintain the ff:
    PO is 1 line item 1pc=1000
    ZFR1 - Condition type  for Freight cost = 200
    At the time of MIRO ( we dont have GR processing),the screen display 2 line item for the expense and freight cost but the GL account defaulted in the freight cost is same as expense account instead of the freight account. then if do a simulate, the following are the entry (which is wrong)
    Vendor   1111                 1200  
    Expense   3333              1000(-)
    Expense   3333                200(-)          * supposed to charge to my freight accnt 2222
    below step i configured.
    created new condition type ZFR1 (copying std FR1B)
    put B- Delivery cost and tick 'Accrual' in the settings
    maintain transaction event ZFR and posting key
    assigned GL acccount to ZFR
    include the condition type ZFR1 in the calculation schema, put ZFR in the  field 'accrual'
    Appreciate all your advise. many thanks in advance.
    Rgds,
    She

    Hi,
    Check your OBYC settings whether you have assigned the correct GL for the new trans Key.
    Regards,

  • Accounting substitution during MIRO

    Hello Experts,
    I need to define substitution during MIRO
    Process is :
    When material is received from foreign vendor, exchange rate used is as on the date of mat receipt. But the requirement is to valuate the inventory
    with exchange rate prevailing on invoice date (ex rate declaration date)
    Currently, system takes difference between invoice date's ex rate and mat receipt date's ex rate to exchange gain/loss.
    During MIRO such exchange gain/ loss is posted to, say, account 611400 account
    I need to define substitution rule wherein system posts such gain/loss to different GL account,say, 520430. So that exchange gain/loss on only such transaction is readily available for reporting requirement.
    How such substitution rule can be defined.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards      

    Hi
    Please, see these notes
    SAP Note 116250 - MR08/MR8M:Cancellation+exchange rate diffrnces(KDM)
    SAP Note 165635 - Documentation: Enhancement LMR1M001 (MM-IV)
    SAP Note 1156325 - BAdIs in the Logistics Invoice Verification environment
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • During MIRO Condition line item not picking against Delivey Note

    Hi,
    We create a PO with Entry tax condition type. Problem is....
    Case 1: - When we are doing MIRO of this PO, Entry tax condition is showing in line item.
    Case 2: - When we are doing MIRO against Delivery Note of related PO, Entry tax condition is not showing in line item...Why???
    Note: - During testing we found 2 diff. thing for both case..
    1. In Case 1 during MIRO, Variance Type showing values (B & A)...
    ...........B for Material Line Item.
    ...........A for Condition Line Item.
    2. In Case 2 during MIRO, Variance Type showing value only B..
    Please guide..

    Hi
    Check this thread
    MIRO - Tax Code
    Thanks !
    E.Avudaiappan

  • Purchasing Vendor During MIRO

    We have implemented partner functions, linking a purchasing vendor with an A/P vendor, using standard functionality.
    In testing, A/P reports that they are currently able to enter the invoice against the purchasing vendor as well as against the A/P vendor.
    What is needed to prevent the purchasing vendor number from being inadvertently selected during MIRO?

    HEy
    If you meantained the vendor in XK01 adress of the vendor and its code both you can see the header data screen in MIRO.
    And if you want  a print of document you will have to set document for printing from MIRO - GO TO >  messages.
    Set the printer and get a print preview from t code MR90 with document no.
    Kaustubh

  • Service Tax condition not picking during MIRO

    Hi,
    Referring earlier posted thread,
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2135441&tstart=0
    I want to know insert a Tax Code - VAT for 10% and a Condition Type - Service Tax for 10.3%...
    During MIRO, Service Tax Amount is not Picking... Why???
    There is any solution for it.....

    Hi,
    If we create Service condition type, then why need to create Tax code in FTXP and maintain in FV11...
    Why both things need to create...??
    No need to maintain
    check for your service tax condition type
    Cond. class   A Discount or
    Calculat.type A percentage
    Cond.category B Delivery co
    and you have accrual tick for your condition in t-code M/06
    also check in your pricing procedure you have assign account key and accrual key for your condition type in t-code
    M/08
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Wrong excise duty during miro

    sap gurus,
    our scenario is we capture excise invoice then migo(GR) then post excise invoice and then after that miro.
    In many cases we need to change excise duty in j1iex and then we post excise through j1iex. The changes that we do in excise duty should be reflected in miro coz in our case we do miro after j1iex(post). In few cases system is not reflecting correct excise invoice in miro. during miro system is picking excise as is in PO and not the one changed in ji1ex.
    And yes we always do miro after excise post(j1iex). Plz tell me the solution.

    In Miro,tax amounts will be calculated according to tax code so if you do changes in J1IEX then it wont' be reflected in invoice.
    For dealer vendor you need to tick MRP indicator in miscellaneous tab of excise invoice(J1IEX),enter excise base value,
    excise duties for capturing,refer it in migo & later post excise invoice.
    In MIRO change base amount without excise duties,select ed tax code,now you can see orginal excise duties captured in j1iex will be reflected in MIRO.
    Refer note 1104456 - Use of MRP indicator for capturing excise duties from dealer

  • User exit during MIRO with PO reference data

    I have maintained dates Validity Star and End dates in Purchase order header data. My client wants that during MIRO system will throw error message if the posting date of IV crosses the Validity end date maintained in PO.
    Is there any user exit for this so that during giving PO reference system will look for this data in PO and throw message or during simulate or post.
    Regards,
    Suman

    Hello Suman,
    Please follow this steps to get the list of Userexits for the TCODE MIRO read there short description to get the appropriate EXIT.
    Steps.
    1. Goto the Tcode
    2. System-> Status.
    3. Copy the program name, find the package for the program.
    4. Go to SMOD (tccode)  press F4 -> Click on "Information System" Push Button->
       Enter the Package name-> and press the enter button.
    5. Now you get the list of Userexits. Need to select one by looking into its short    description.
    Hope this solves your issue,
    Cheers,
    Suvendu

  • Prob. in Implement User Exit for wrong calculation of Surcharge during MIRO

    Dear All,
    In our system the calculation of Surcharge is wrong during MIRO.
    So i write this issue to the SAP, the below solution is provided by them :
    Use the user exit 'J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV' to redetermine
    the additional VAT condition type value. This user exit will be
    called after the FM 'J_1I4A_TAX_CONDITIONS', where the
    redetermination of the VAT will take place on the basis of
    the changed excise duties.
    So, userexit can be implemented by CMOD and SMOD, but this userexit actually a Function Module.
    But now the problem is how can i implement the 'J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV' function Module.
    Regards,
    Nitin Garg

    Dear,
    Thanks. I already make a enhacement in this function Module and write the below code:
    ENHANCEMENT 1  ZMIRO.    "active version
    DATA : WA_XKOMV TYPE KOMV.
    DATA : WA_KBETR TYPE KOMV-KBETR,
           IDX TYPE SY-TABIX.
    LOOP AT XKOMV WHERE KSCHL = 'ZSUR'.
      IDX = SY-TABIX.
      WA_KBETR = XKOMV-KBETR / 10.
      READ TABLE XKOMV INTO WA_XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JVRD'.
      XKOMV-KWERT = WA_XKOMV-KWERT * WA_KBETR / 100.
      MODIFY XKOMV INDEX IDX TRANSPORTING KWERT.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDENHANCEMENT.
    ZSUR is a custom surcharge condition type. But still surcharge is wrong calculated.
    Nitin Garg.

  • Two a/c doc generated during MIRO

    Dear All,
    During MIRO transaction two accounting documents are generating with different posting dates for some invoices.
    One accounting doc is generating correctly while in other accounting doc small amount is posted to consumption account and stock account with same amount is getting credited and this document is generating in next period(UMB and BSX keys hitted)
    What could be the reason for the same?
    Thanks,
    Naren

    Dear Abhi,
    Can you explain this more as for very few invoices it is creating two a/c entries and i have not changed price control of any material from std price to map or MAP to std price.
    Naren

Maybe you are looking for