Re: Freight Cost during MIRO

Dear All,
Need help...I configured the following steps in order to capture freight cost during MIRO. but during MIRO,
the GL account captured/defaulted to freight cost is same as the expense accnt instead of the freight cost account..
eg. Expense -1111
      Freight   -2222
      Vendor - 3333
Created 1 PO and maintain the ff:
PO is 1 line item 1pc=1000
ZFR1 - Condition type for Freight cost = 200
At the time of MIRO ( we dont have GR processing),the screen display 2 line item for the expense and freight cost but the GL account defaulted in the freight cost is same as expense account instead of the freight account. then if do a simulate, the following are the entry (which is wrong)
Vendor   1111                 1200
Expense   3333              1000(-)
Expense   3333                200(-)          * supposed to charge to my freight accnt 2222
below step i configured.
created new condition type ZFR1 (copying std FR1B)
put B- Delivery cost and tick 'Accrual' in the settings
maintain transaction event ZFR and posting key
assigned GL acccount to ZFR
include the condition type ZFR1 in the calculation schema, put ZFR in the field 'accrual'
Appreciate all your advise. many thanks in advance.
Rgds,
She

Hi,
Check your OBYC settings whether you have assigned the correct GL for the new trans Key.
Regards,

Similar Messages

Multiple account assignment for distribution of freight cost in MIRO Transaction

Hi MM Gurus
I have created one Purchase order with multiple account assignment for Asset 'A' in which freight cost is added.
I have done good receipt in which only material document is generated. (No financial document generated).
While doing the MIRO for the same Purchase order I m not able to view delivery cost for the same.
I check this thing in SDN but no concrete solution ..
My question is how to capture delivery cost in Multiple account assignment Purchase roder
Regards
Amit

Hi,
You have done goods receipt for Asset PO but no accounting document created. Now cross check in t.code:OME9 and find GR Non-Valuated check box selected which cause your concern on why your accounting document created for goods receipt for Asset PO!
Check how delivery cost designed for your Asset Purchase, may be in your case - delivery cost added to your asset purchase- which result, you could not find delivery cost in invoice posting!
Regards,
Biju K

Unplanned Del Cost during MIRO - VAT gets recalculated.

Hello all

Scenario:
I have an invoice for procured items with VAT.
The unplanned del costs are configured to load onto material.
I enter the UDC (unplanned delivery costs) in the header and they get distributed proportionally among invoice items.
However my VAT value gets recalculated taking into account the UDC amount.
We now distribute the UDC manually among the items in the invoice in the Material tab. This way the VAT amount is not recaculated.
However this is a long process when the number of items in the invoice are large
and the UDC per item have to be calculated manually.
Requirement
I want to enter UDC in the header so that it distributes the amount among the items and not have VAT recalculated
Thank you
S Datar

Dear Satyajit,
This is standard functionality of SAP. The logic SAP follows as below:
(1) Unplanned delivery cost that needs to be posted during invoice verification gets apportioned to the base values of line items considered for invoice verification
(2) Since the Tax is always calculated on the base values of the line items, the tax also calculated on apportioned unplanned delivery cost.
(3) There are no Configuration or User exits available to avoid calculation of tax on unplanned delivery cost.
My workaround solutions / suggestions to meet your requirements of loading unplanned delivery costs to material value as below:
(1) Posting unplanned delivery costs directly to Material value. This is achieved by allowing direct posting to Article at MIRO.
(2) Post-unplanned delivery costs as subsequent debit memo using MIRO. Here, you can choose the relevant tax code based on the requirement
Hope this info will be useful.
Bye,
Muralidhara

Full Freight Cost payment to Vendor irrespective of GRN Quantity.

Hi MM Gurus,
I have a requirement where our client have to pay to Vendor for Frieght Value in the first bill (Vendor send many bills based on the GRN quantities) only irrespective of the GRN Quantity.
E.g I have a PO of 100 Qty and the Frieght condition value as 100 INR. Now, We have done partial GRN of 10 Qty only so the INR 10 is inventorized on the material for freight cost during GRN. But we have to pay 100 INR (full amount of Freight Condition) to vendor during MIRO for partial bill of 10 quantities of which we have done GRN.
I have tried doing in MIRO by entering full value 100 INR and 100 Quantity in MIRO for freight Condition but due to tolerance defined in system the invoice goes for block for payment. Actually, the concerned user do not have authorization for the release of blocked invoices (MRBR) and we cannot change the tolerance also because it comes under Audit.
I was thinking whether we do have something in Condition type settings where we can pay full frient cost to vendor in the first bill only irrespective of the Partial GRN?
Please suggest me on this.
Regards,
Neeraj

Hi,
Create a freight vendor separately and assign that condition for th freight vendor in conditions of PO and for that freight vendor do not check the G/Rbased.
In this case after creation of PO you need to do MIRO woth planned delivery cost selection in that screen and then you get a pop up where in you can select your freight venodr and make invoice verifiation for that freignt vendor and later you can go with GR for as much ever quantity as you are in need.In this way it wont effect the freight price with respect to your inward quantity.
Thanks.

Planned Delivery Cost in MIRO for different freight vendor

Hi,
Kindly share, how to get rid of above issue:
1) PO created with a freight condition (FRA1 with a different vendor assigned to it under item conditions tab)
2) GR done, & all accounting entries were OK, (including freight costs in FR1 or FR3)
3) while doing MIRO with selection Planned-Delivery-Cost, Amount & Qty fields are "Blank" and auto flowing from Clearing A/cs
I found this error in both Domestic or Import POs.
I've read many threads, but could not find a clear solutions for the same.
Plz help
Sankar

Hi,
Plz find screens.
Amount & Qty fields not flowing in MIRO from open GRIR/clearing account balance.

Post freight cost to a different a GL account during 411-K for consignment PO Process

We are planning to implement PO consignment for one of the client.
The scenario is, client pays the freight cost to the supplier in advance upon receipt of consignment stock .When consignment stock is moved to own stock (411k), during the movement of the stock we need to create two accounting entries one for the material cost and the other for freight cost such that the freight can be adjusted with advance paid freight cost. Freight cost can be settled manually with another PO but the requirement is moving average price of the material should include the cost of material and freight cost .
For an example if the material cost is $100(PB00) and freight cost is $10(FAR1 - 10%), during 411k it should create two entries one for material cost($100) and the other for freight cost($10) which can be adjusted manually.
We tried by adding freight condition (FRA1) in consignment info record along with PB00 –Gross price and in this case during 411k it is summing both the prices($110) and posting to one GL account and the same settles during MRKO but what we are looking for is how we can split this into $100 and $10 .
I know standard SAP does not support this this during 411k.
I want to know if there is any User exit, pricing procedure, routines, etc... Or any other way that can be used to achieve this requirement. Appreciate more detailed answer

Hi,
   As you know, currently the delivery cost are not supported in consignment and pipeline settlement. The system design is explained in the note: 208555 - MB11 Delivery costs for pipeline and consignment.
   If you want delivery cost in consignment, you have to go for development. There should be additional entry for delivery costs in RKWA table. I am not sure about the feasibility, but still would like to share the below points:
   For creating additional entry in the accounting document while doing MB1B / MB11, you may check the BADI AC_DOCUMENT.
   You may refer the note: 165647 - Documentation: Enhancement RMVKON00 (MM-IV) which explains some enhancements related to consignment settlement.
Regards,
AKPT

MIRO - Credit memo considering freight costs

Dear friends ,
We need to process a Goods Return to the vendor, but the goods has additional costs like Freight.
So we are doing the reversal process as follow:
MIRO - Credit memo
=> but when we process the credit memo the System brought together the freight costs.
we need to return but not remove the freight costs from the material cost.
MIGO movement 122.
=> here everything is ok.
Question:
How treat that situation where we need to keep the freight costs in the material account ?
Best regards,
Alessandro

hi
in that case, in miro header, there is a tab "details" here u have a option to enter unplanned dlvy cost.. u can enter ur unplanned dkvy cost.
ref the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/cb/370d3ae4533072e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Edited by: Jayakumar Raju A.S on Aug 17, 2009 3:00 PM

Freight Cost not reflecting in MIRO for Return PO

HI MM Experts,
In standard Return Process we used to enter all the freight charges + base Price in the base Price only but we have a requirement where we have to show these freight charges (-100 INR) seperately other than base Price (-1000 INR) and the net price must appear as -1100 INR in PO.
I have a business scenario in hand where in Return PO different condition types like Insurance, Octroi and Freight cost are not reflecting while creating Credit Memo in MIRO.
I have created different condition types as mentioned above and Condition category as "F- Freight" is used and also used a routine 164 in Calculation type in Schema against these conditions to make the conditions negative (to make sure that all the above mentioned conditions must be added in base Price in PO).
In PO, all conditions are reflecting correctly and adding to the base Price. In GR also Return accounting is also happening correctly but in MIRO when i am trying to make credit memo then system only showing base price and taxes it is not reflecting other condition types (Insurance, Octroi and Freight ) in MIRO.
If anyone have any idea how to get these freight cost, insurance and octroi cost in MIRO then please reveret back.
Regards,
Neeraj

Hi Neeraj,
Before to answer this, once you are in MIRO, into the "PO reference" tab, do you have selected the option: 3 Good/services items + planned delivery costs?
This option is in the top on this tab in the right side.
Please, let me know your feedback.
Kind regards,
Sandra

Freight posting in MIRO based upon multiple goods receipt.

Hi
In one of the companies they are requesting the freight charge to be broken into multiple lines (based upon multiple goods receipt) instead of one consolidated balances in the invoice (MIRO). Right now each time we do a MIGO against the same PO the system creates a seperate material document and the entry is (and that is correct) :
Inventory - XXXX
GR/IR (Cost)- XXXX
GR/IR (Freight) XXXX
PPV XXXX
for example if migo is done 3 times against the same PO the system posts 3 seperate material document and everything is correct.
When we do a MIRO the system generates 3 seperate lines for GR/IR (Cost) but it consolidates GR/IR(freight) and posts the entire value in one line.
Requirement is : We want the system to break freight cost into 3 seperate in the invoice.
Did anyone come across this issue before.
Thanks
Joseph

Hi Joseph,
I guess you can use MIRO 3 times, and post separated delivery costs into 3 freight invoices.
During each time, you can choose only 1 line to carry out the posting.
Thanks and regards,
Polly

Freight amount during GRN

Dear Gurus,
Material's order unit and pricing unit is in PC and freight amount needs to be in Rs/KG(on the unit of KG), as the vendor will take the freight as per the actual weight of the material, same will come to know during weighing at the time of GRN and during the creation of PO conversion factor is not fixed between material pricing unit(PC) and freight unit(KG).
I thought of giving the freight amount in the freight condition type along with the conversion factor , but now client is saying conversion faco
so how to pay the actual freight amount to the vendor.
Thanks & Regards
Nitin Chhabra

Hi ,
Since there is no planned cost here , freight condition can be ignored.
During MIRO enter the actual cost manually on G/L Account section with actual Value and Freight GL account.
Thanks,
sudhakar

Loading freight cost on inventory

Dear All
I am implementing LE .Our client want freight charges to get uploaded on inventory during STO. Will any-one please help me to get rid of this problem , I want urgent solution for this .
Best Regards
Parveen Kumar Thakur

Hi,
Apology, I am not clear what do you require from your reply message about those items you have listed. Did you want to understand what they are or did you want to know what configuration settings to maintain for those? Those settings are dependent on your requirements.
1) Cost Distribution - this settings explains the different method possible for apportionment of the cost during settlement (Transfer to CO) - which you can select from Shipment Cost Item, Delivery or Delivery Items.
2) Acct. Assignment Cat. - It allows you to settle the cost to various accounts - used in account determination in tcode OBYC (GBB - > VBR). Where those are setup, the desired account is determined in the shipment cost document.
3) Origin of CO - This is used to determine where the origin of the CO object should be determined from. The selection provides you various sequences, which you can possibly use. It is possible directly through a G/L Account, through the sequence of Delivery, then if not found, it will determine from Order and finally through the sequence of Delivery, Order and G/L Account.
4) Relevant for settlement - In this case, depending on your requirement you can consider the option of settling through a G/L account or through the delivery costs method (which is detailed in "a" and "b" below). Otherwise, the settings commonly used is "X".
And, I am not sure what is your real intention here, but definitely you can generate PO to forwarding agent simultaneously, and then perform MIRO against the forwarding agent/shipment cost document/PO. It depends on your requirement, and in some instances, a company can have an agreement with the customer or vendor that the transportation cost is to be borne by them along with the materials procured or sold.
Hence, there are three possible methods the shipment cost can be handled:
a) The cost is to be included in the PO for the material (which I have just explained above)
b) The cost is to be included in the Billing document for the customer (in the case of Sales scenario)
c) The cost is to be handled separately in a shipment cost document --> Freight PO --> Payment to Forwarding Agent (which is the common practice by many).
Hope the above helps.
Thanks.

Unplanned cost in miro

Dear Forum,
I would like to seek clarification on unplanned cost book during miro.
For planned, it will credit vendor debit freight clearing account.
For unplanned, it only can be prorated and distributed in the po item lines. Unplanned cost cannot be posted entirely to any account by itself. correct? why?
1) example for unplanned cost, say unplanned cost is usd300. i must distribute this usd300 to po line items. when distributed to the po line item, sure there is a difference, hence system will post the difference to price difference. correct?
2) why cannot book unplanned cost of usd300 to a specific account? say like credit vendor debit 1 specific acc usd300.
Need help on these 2 points.
Thanks

If you configure a g/l account for unplanned delivery cost,it will definetly hit that acct,no need to distribute amt all p.o line items.
Acct document will be Vendor Cr GR/IR Dr Unplanned delivery cost Dr.
or other wise try subsequent debit in MIRO(to add freight cost).

Reducing the Freight cost on material value for undelivered material

Hi Experts,
Summary : The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material. The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded. The details scenario is mentioned below :-
We have to make a Purchase Order with material code say ABC for procured of some material. Suppose we make a Purchase Order for 100 nos. at a Unit Price of Say Rs. 10/- for Material Code ABC on say Vendor M/s XYZ. A freight condition is maintained in the Conditions Tab and suppose the Freight is Rs. 10 per unit of the material.
While preparing the Goods Receipt through MIGO, in the Freight Tab we select say freight vendor say M/s PQR against the freight condition and post the goods receipt.
While doing Invoice Processing in MIRO, when we enter the combination of Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost the system will populate the vendor codes of both the supplier of material and the transporter. On selecting the transporter the freight amount will populate against which the invoice of the tranporter can be processed.
In the Vendor Master of M/s XYZ GR-Based Invoice Verification is activated.
The vendor is allowed an under tolerance of 0.5% (i.e. the vendor should deliver at least 99.50 nos. of the Purchase Order). If the vendor delivers 99.50 or more then there will be no deduction in the freight charges.
But suppose the vendor delivers only 99.4 nos. of the quantity. Then we will prepare the GRIR for 99.4 nos.only. But while processing the MIRO we need to deduct 1.5 times the value of the material from the freight amount for the shortshipped quantity, i.e.
0.1 no (99.5 u2013 99.4) X Rs. 10/- * 1.5 = Rs. 1.5 are to be deducted from the final payment from the freight amount of the transporter.
The material supplier will have to be paid in full 100 nos. of quantity and will raise an invoice for 100 nos. A dummy GRIR for the 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will have to be prepared for processing the invoice for the 100 nos. of the material supplier and a dummy issue for 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will be prepared to remove them from the system.
Hence the freight cost for this 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will also go into the cost of the material and increase the MAP by that amount. Also the goods issue Cost will also have the effect of the freight cost.
We do not want to load the freight cost for the undelivered material in the value of the material.
Can any one please suggest a solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
AJ.

Hi
A PO Will be raised for full quantity of material say 100 nos.
The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material.
A freight vendor is maintained at the time of GR for material against the freight condition maintained in the Po.
The freight vendor facilitates the delivery of the material from the vendor to the purchaser for which he is given an under tolerance limit of 0.5%. Any delivery below this tolerance limit, freight amount to the effect of 1.5 times the per unit rate of material x short fall below 0.5% tolerance will be deducted from the freight amount.
A dummy grir will have to be prepared for the short delivered quantity for processing the invoice for the full quantity of the purchase order, as the vendor is going to raise the invoice for full purchase order quantity. The client does not want to load the freight cost of the undelivered quantity on the material value as it will wrongly show the MAP of the material. This shortshipped material will be issued to remove it from the system and the stock will remain for the delivered quantity only. The vendor is subject to gr based invoice verification.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks in advance.
AJ
The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded.

Reducing freight cost for undelivered material

Hi Experts,
Summary : The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material. The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded. The details scenario is mentioned below :-
We have to make a Purchase Order with material code say ABC for procured of some material. Suppose we make a Purchase Order for 100 nos. at a Unit Price of Say Rs. 10/- for Material Code ABC on say Vendor M/s XYZ. A freight condition is maintained in the Conditions Tab and suppose the Freight is Rs. 10 per unit of the material.
While preparing the Goods Receipt through MIGO, in the Freight Tab we select say freight vendor say M/s PQR against the freight condition and post the goods receipt.
While doing Invoice Processing in MIRO, when we enter the combination of Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost the system will populate the vendor codes of both the supplier of material and the transporter. On selecting the transporter the freight amount will populate against which the invoice of the tranporter can be processed.
In the Vendor Master of M/s XYZ GR-Based Invoice Verification is activated.
The vendor is allowed an under tolerance of 0.5% (i.e. the vendor should deliver at least 99.50 nos. of the Purchase Order). If the vendor delivers 99.50 or more then there will be no deduction in the freight charges.
But suppose the vendor delivers only 99.4 nos. of the quantity. Then we will prepare the GRIR for 99.4 nos.only. But while processing the MIRO we need to deduct 1.5 times the value of the material from the freight amount for the shortshipped quantity, i.e.
0.1 no (99.5 u2013 99.4) X Rs. 10/- * 1.5 = Rs. 1.5 are to be deducted from the final payment from the freight amount of the transporter.
The material supplier will have to be paid in full 100 nos. of quantity and will raise an invoice for 100 nos. A dummy GRIR for the 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will have to be prepared for processing the invoice for the 100 nos. of the material supplier and a dummy issue for 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will be prepared to remove them from the system.
Hence the freight cost for this 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will also go into the cost of the material and increase the MAP by that amount. Also the goods issue Cost will also have the effect of the freight cost.
We do not want to load the freight cost for the undelivered material in the value of the material.
Can any one please suggest a solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
AJ.

answered

Exchange Rate difference posting during MIRO posting

Hi ,
We are facing an issue for exchange rate difference posting during MIRO.
PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date. Vendor in PO has different currency than company code currency. Exchange rate maintained in OB08 for this period is taken in PO.
PO value & GR value is same. Due to raw material cost there was price difference posted during GR posting.
(i.e. Raw material cost - GR/IR value = Price difference amount)
During posting MIGO, 3 accounts got posted.
Raw material cost account got debited & offset credit to GR/IR account & price difference account (in vendor & company code currency also)
During posting MIRO, 4 accounts got posted.
Vendor account got credited with GR/IR amount & offset to GR/IR account debit.
Exchange rate difference account got credited & offset to price difference account (in company code currency only)
Since PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date, then why system has posted exchange rate difference account in local currency only during MIRO posting ?
Your inputs appreciated.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
there is a setting in configuration of logistics invoice verification where you can control the calculation and posting of exchange rate differences. If you had the setting active that exchange rate differences are calculated against a planned exchange rate, that might lead to the kind of postings you describe. Please check.
best regards, Udo

Re: Freight Cost during MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for