Reached maximum capacity of pool "eis/PRAdapterCF", making "0" new resource

Hi All,
We configured weblogic with pega. I am getting below error. Any idea ?
I enabled test conection reserve. and increased test frequency 900
####<Nov 13, 2012 1:25:46 PM CST> <Info> <Common> <test4> <PEGA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <> <> <1352834746443> <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool "eis/PRAdapterCF", making "0" new resource instances instead of "1".>
####<Nov 13, 2012 1:25:46 PM CST> <Info> <Common> <test4> <PEGA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <> <> <1352834746444> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "eis/PRAdapterCF", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
####<Nov 13, 2012 1:25:46 PM CST> <Info> <Common> <test4> <PEGA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <> <> <1352834746749> <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool "eis/PRAdapterCF", making "0" new resource instances instead of "1".>
####<Nov 13, 2012 1:25:46 PM CST> <Info> <Common> <test4> <PEGA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <> <> <1352834746750> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "eis/PRAdapterCF", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
####<Nov 13, 2012 1:25:46 PM CST> <Info> <Common> <test4> <PEGA> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '9' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <> <> <1352834746837> <BEA-Thanks,
Edited by: 834617 on Nov 13, 2012 11:32 AM

Hi Kal,
we already enabled Inactive connection timeout is 900 still its throughing the info.
Thanks,
Edited by: 834617 on Nov 28, 2012 10:39 AM

Similar Messages

MySQLNonTransientConnectionException and Reached maximum capacity of pool

Hi. I'm using jedeveloper 11g and weblogic 10.3x and I'm quite new at this. I have an application with basic CRUD functions deployed in my weblogic server with a MySQL database as its data source. It was running well until we encountered an SQL exception error. Here's the log of the error:
BEA-001112 - Test "SELECT 1" set up for pool "EvCoreMySqlDS" failed with exception: "com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLNonTransientConnectionException: No operations allowed after statement closed.".
After some time, we tried accessing the page again. This time, it was now running perfectly well again. Then sometimes it throws this error with a blank page.
BEA-000627 - Reached maximum capacity of pool "EvCoreMySqlDS", making "0" new resource instances instead of "1".
Can anyone help me regarding these two errors? Are these two errors related? Could you please enlighten me how did these occur? And most importantly, how can I fix this? Thanks.
Edited by: rageDev on Sep 2, 2010 11:44 PM

Hi Kal,
we already enabled Inactive connection timeout is 900 still its throughing the info.
Thanks,
Edited by: 834617 on Nov 28, 2012 10:39 AM

Outage with BEA-000627 Reached maximum capacity of pool

Hi , i am having an outage in the application and at the time of outage i am seeing a lot of <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool > messages.
Now just before i am getting <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool > i have seen messages of :
<BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "iemphsysOracleCP" closed.>
there are 45 such connection closing messages .
the initial capcity for connection is 25 and maximum capacity is 75 , 50 threads are allowed to run.
just after closing the connection by weblogic , i see only one message of connection created , but after that i see messages of reached maximum capacity.
The shirking is allowed and shrinking frequency is 900 secs, now the connections are closed when there are connections existing in the pool above the initial capacity and they are not being used, so weblogic closes the connection, in my problem the connections are closed and just after that one connection created and i see messages of reached maximum capacity , if connections are closed then these should be able to be created again and i shoud not see that maximum capacity message.
The test connections frequency is also 0 and testconns on reserve set to true , also testconnon release is true.
Remove infected connections is enabled.
how it can reach maximum capacity while just before that it is closing the connections ????

gaurav joshi wrote:
Hi , i am having an outage in the application and at the time of outage i am seeing a lot of <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool > messages.
Now just before i am getting <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool > i have seen messages of :
<BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "iemphsysOracleCP" closed.>
there are 45 such connection closing messages .
the initial capcity for connection is 25 and maximum capacity is 75 , 50 threads are allowed to run.
just after closing the connection by weblogic , i see only one message of connection created , but after that i see messages of reached maximum capacity.
The shirking is allowed and shrinking frequency is 900 secs, now the connections are closed when there are connections existing in the pool above the initial capacity and they are not being used, so weblogic closes the connection, in my problem the connections are closed and just after that one connection created and i see messages of reached maximum capacity , if connections are closed then these should be able to be created again and i shoud not see that maximum capacity message.
The test connections frequency is also 0 and testconns on reserve set to true , also testconnon release is true.
Remove infected connections is enabled.
how it can reach maximum capacity while just before that it is closing the connections ????Hi. Can you tell me the version of WLS you're using, and also
show me the whole pool definition? There's no need for shrink.
I would recommend turning it off. I would set initial capacity
and max capacity to 50. I would turn off test-conn-on-release.
That is a waste of performance.
Joe

Channel has reached maximum concurrency (5,000 concurrent messages)

Hi Experts,
I have executed a scenario: IDocs to AS400 (JDBC Adapter). Some IDocs were processed succesfully but some are giving the following error.
"com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Channel has reached maximum concurrency (5,000 concurrent messages) and no free resource found within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the maximum concurrency level"
Can any one faced this problem? Please do needful...
Regards,
Ramesh.

Hi,
This error occurs when the channel has only few (minimum 1) resources in the pool(to connect the DB in parallel) and the messages load to that channel is high. Hence, channel will reach to maximum concurrency( minimum 1, by default). In this case, you can increase this maximum concurrency value to higher value (could be 3 to 5) and check whether the issue is happening still.
Hope this feature implementation will solve your problem.
Regards,
Soorya

JDBC reveiver channel has reached maximum concurrency

Hi Guys,
We have an XI environment with around 50 Proxy - XI - JDBC scenarios, all using the same JDBC receiver communication channel that has been set up to update a Microsoft SQL DB. It may be the case that some scenarios are running concurrently, and we get the following error in CC Monitoring:
"Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Channel has reached maximum concurrency (5,000 concurrent messages) and no free resource found within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the maximum concurrency level"
However, after some retries, messages are processed successfully at the receiver DB side.
After some research, I found out that I have to change Maximum Concurrency Parameter, in JDBC receiver CC configuration. Currently this is set to default value "1".
Do you have any ideas what value I have to insert ? Are there any other parameters e.g. in VA, that have to be changed in order to overcome this issue ?
Thank you.

One more JDBC channel
Do not create another channel for the same DB/ scenario.....you will be increasing load on XI/ PI server for no use....and it wont help you either.....you will end up having one more channel fighting with other channels to get resources

Problem with reached maximum number of connections to database

Dear Experts,
Our Production system was not responding properly last week.
The below was the reply from the Basis team.
"It seems that we have again problem with reached maximum number of connections to database. We have extended this number to 100 this year and now it seems that it’s not enough again. It seems that something is running on Production, which takes over too many connections."
They have increased the number to 200 as a work around.
Do we have any means to find out, which component or application is causing the issue.
Please advise me if any better way is available to correct the issue.
Please see the below trace.
From default trace:
======
Caused by: com.sap.engine.services.dbpool.exceptions.BaseSQLException: ResourceException occurred in method ConnectionFactoryImpl.getConnection(): javax.resource.R
esourceException: (Failed in component: dbpool, BC-JAS-TRH) Cannot create connection. Possible reasons: 1)Maximum allowed connections to DB or EIS is reached. You
can apply CSN Note 719778 in order to check and resolve connection leaks. 2) Configuration to DB/EIS is wrong or DB/EIS is temporary unreachable. 3) Connections ar
e not enough for current load.
        at com.sap.engine.services.dbpool.cci.ConnectionFactoryImpl.getConnection(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:60)
        at com.sap.security.core.persistence.datasource.imp.J2EEConnectionPool.getConnection(J2EEConnectionPool.java:205)
        ... 61 more
Caused by: javax.resource.ResourceException: (Failed in component: dbpool, BC-JAS-TRH) Cannot create connection. Possible reasons: 1)Maximum allowed connections to
DB or EIS is reached. You can apply CSN Note 719778 in order to check and resolve connection leaks. 2) Configuration to DB/EIS is wrong or DB/EIS is temporary unr
eachable. 3) Connections are not enough for current load.
        at com.sap.engine.services.connector.jca.ConnectionHashSet.match(ConnectionHashSet.java:230)
        at com.sap.engine.services.connector.jca.ConnectionManagerImpl.allocateConnection(ConnectionManagerImpl.java:343)
        at com.sap.engine.services.connector.jca.ShareableConnectionManager.allocateConnection(ShareableConnectionManager.java:54)
        at com.sap.engine.services.dbpool.cci.ConnectionFactoryImpl.getConnection(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:52)
        ... 62 more
Caused by: com.sap.engine.services.dbpool.exceptions.BaseResourceException: SQLException is thrown by the pooled connection: com.sap.sql.log.OpenSQLException: No c
onnection to data source SAPEPPDB available. All 100 pooled connections are in use and 70 connection requests are currently waiting. The connection pool size might
need to be adjusted.
        at com.sap.engine.services.dbpool.spi.ManagedConnectionFactoryImpl.createManagedConnection(ManagedConnectionFactoryImpl.java:192)
        at com.sap.engine.services.connector.jca.ConnectionHashSet.match(ConnectionHashSet.java:221)
        ... 65 more
Caused by: com.sap.sql.log.OpenSQLException: No connection to data source SAPEPPDB available. All 100 pooled connections are in use and 70 connection requests are
currently waiting. The connection pool size might need to be adjusted.
======
Thanks and Kind Regards,
Jelbin

Stop all instances(including DB) and start again, Hope it should work.
It may happened that jar has not been synchronized with the database and may be version mismatch with the java.
719778 - Data Source fails to return connection
1650472 - Transactions are interrupted due to database connection periodically failing to establish
1138877 - How to Deploy External Drivers JDBC/JMS Adapters
Change the connection pool so that it can connect to DB as per the note 719778
Regards
Vijay Kalluri

UnsyncCircularQueue$FullQ Queue exceed maximum capacity of: '65536' element

dear friends:
Does anyone knows the problem like this <BEA-002911> <WorkManager ClusterMessaging failed to schedule a request due to weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue$FullQueueException: Queue exceed maximum capacity of: '65536' elements
weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue$FullQueueException: Queue exceed maximum capacity of: '65536' elements
why this happend and how to solve it?
thanks a lot!

Hi,
Weblogic has a maximum storage for Pending Request queue configured at 65536. At this point, it will stop accepting incoming request to your Server Socket port.
This means that your Weblogic server / JVM very likely has depleted its internal Thread Pool triggering Weblogic to start queuing incoming requests; eventually reaching its maximum capacity.
From a resolution perspective, you will need to investigate the root cause, Thread Dump generation and analysis will be required in your case.
Please generate a JVM Thread Dump (kill -3 <pid> for UNIX OS) and share detail on Thread contention / problem pattern.
Thanks.
P-H
http://javaeesupportpatterns.blogspot.com/

Queue exceed maximum capacity of '256' elements.

          Has anyone seen this one before??
          Thanks
          Thomas
          weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue$FullQueueException: Queue exceed maximum capacity
          of: '256' elements.
          weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue$FullQueueException:      of: '256' elements
          at weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue.expandQueue(UnsyncCircularQueue.java:72)
          at weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue.put(UnsyncCircularQueue.java:94)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThreadManager.execute(ExecuteThreadManager.java:343)
          at weblogic.kernel.Kernel.execute(Kernel.java:338)
          at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.dispatch(BasicServerRef.java:304)
          at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatchRequest(RJVMImpl.java:923)
          at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatch(RJVMImpl.java:844)
          at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManagerServer.handleRJVM(ConnectionManagerServer.java:222)
          at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManager.dispatch(ConnectionManager.java:794)
          at weblogic.rjvm.t3.T3JVMConnection.dispatch(T3JVMConnection.java:570)
          at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocketOnce(SocketMuxer.java:681)
          at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocket(SocketMuxer.java:627)
          at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:123)
          at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:32)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170)


Hi,
          The queue in question here is not a JMS queue. Instead,
          this is the "execute queue" of jobs waiting to be
          serviced by a thread in its thread pool.
          I think the size of these queues is configurable on the
          thread pool. Note that if dead-lock is locking up threads
          and causing the problem,
          you will likely need to increase the number of threads
          or dedicate server-side resources to their own thread pools
          rather than (or in addition to) increasing the size
          of the execute queues. (A thread dump helps
          in diagnose dead-locks.)
          Likely this error is on a server side thread pool, so
          there should be warnings/error messages in the server logs
          that describe what is happening.
          Tom
          Thomas Kreig wrote:
          > Has anyone seen this one before??
          > Thanks
          > Thomas
          >
          > weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue$FullQueueException: Queue exceed maximum capacity
          > of: '256' elements.
          > weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue$FullQueueException:      of: '256' elements
          > at weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue.expandQueue(UnsyncCircularQueue.java:72)
          > at weblogic.utils.UnsyncCircularQueue.put(UnsyncCircularQueue.java:94)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThreadManager.execute(ExecuteThreadManager.java:343)
          > at weblogic.kernel.Kernel.execute(Kernel.java:338)
          > at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.dispatch(BasicServerRef.java:304)
          > at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatchRequest(RJVMImpl.java:923)
          > at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatch(RJVMImpl.java:844)
          > at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManagerServer.handleRJVM(ConnectionManagerServer.java:222)
          > at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManager.dispatch(ConnectionManager.java:794)
          > at weblogic.rjvm.t3.T3JVMConnection.dispatch(T3JVMConnection.java:570)
          > at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocketOnce(SocketMuxer.java:681)
          > at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.readReadySocket(SocketMuxer.java:627)
          > at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:123)
          > at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:32)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170)
          >

Datasource Maximum capacity in Cluster

Hi,
I have configured a datasource and assigned maximum capacity of 10 and initial capacity to 2 and targeted it to all server in a clusters(node 1 & node 2).
now how the connections will be utilized in the clustered mode. Both the node will have maximum of 10 connection limit
or each node will have maximum of 10 connection limit ? please clarify me.
Thanks
KK

Maximum Capacity
Maximum capacity is number of allocated session in database side for WebLogic Server divide by number of WebLogic server. Example, DBA allocated 500 session for WebLogic server which has 5 server, so this config value is 500/5 = 100
Initial Capacity
Initial capacity mean number of initial session created when data source started. Recommended value for Initial Capacity is equal to Maximum Capacity size database connection pools. In this case WebLogic never increase the number of connections when it needed by application. Negative impact for this case is increase DB load although only few session use by WebLogic, but if impact in database side is not significant its work well.
Regards
Mukesh Negi
http://weblogicserveradministration.blogspot.in/2010/10/jdbc-connection-pool-performance-tuning.html

How do I add new Apple ID as it said it reach maximum

Please tell me how do I add new apple id as I already added a lot and it's said that it reach maximum. I forgot my Apple ID password and can't recover because I cant ***** the email.

Easy. Open System Preferences > iCloud and sign in with the same Apple ID and password you used when you initially set up your MacBook Pro. Select the iCloud services you wish to use.
I also want to know how to sink my phone with my Mac
Read iOS: Syncing your data with iTunes
Instructional video

What's The Maximum Capacity of Mac Mail

Hi All
I am new in Mac world, I was using outlook in windows with many email, the email files around 3GB, I did the converter of emails by using outlook2mail application.
My questions are, how much the maximum capacity of mac mail, and now I am using mac mail with few emails, its working fast, if I transfer all my emails to mac mail (1000s emails, around 3GB) is it will work in same speed or it will work slow or die ?
Thanks
Khalid

You've asked an unanswerable question. To my best knowledge there are no limits, other than as Barney says the available space on your hard drive. Also, it's impossible to quantify it because email messages vary in size. Do you delete large attachments? Have you created new Mail folders Mail > Mailboxes Sidebar > +? I do have a friend who has over 20,000. If anything gets mucked up you can always rebuild a mailbox from your Mail menu > Mailbox >Rebuild.
-mj

WSH_NEW_DELIVERIES_S Reaching maximum value in Oracle apps 11.5.10.2

Hello Friends,
In one of our production system, WSH_NEW_DELIVERIES_S Reaching maximum value.Current application version is #11.5.10.2 and Database version is 11.2.0.3.0
Can any one help what we can do, do we have any Meta link Note ID's or Patches to do it. as customer will not agree to ALTER the maxvalue with Out Oracle NOTEID or Approved Patch.
As of now Maximum value defined in sequence is 285700000 and the WSH_NEW_DELIVERIES_S.currval is 285012483.
Please suggest.
Current Script in System is as below:
CREATE SEQUENCE WSH.WSH_NEW_DELIVERIES_S
START WITH 285012482
MAXVALUE 285700000
MINVALUE 1
NOCYCLE
NOCACHE
ORDER;

An another possibility is to do the opposite to what I just wrote. Upload the true definition to the database an compare with the one you are not sure about via SQL:
1. Backup the WFT file where the standard/seeded workflow is provided
2. Edit it and change the name of the ITEM_TYPE. For instance, change it from OEOL to OEOL_TMP (cannot exceed 8 characters)
3. Upload it to the database with WFLOAD
4. Compare the design tables for the two if them (WF_ITEM_TYPES, WF_ACTIVITIES, WF_MESSAGES, WF_PROCESS_ACTIVITIES, WF_ITEM_ATTRIBUTES, etc). If the table provides a VERSION column then the query would need to use a WHERE END_DATE is null (so that you get only the active/current version of the object). A select... MINUM select would do the job.
I would do this in test though, to avoid a mistake can cause any issues.
Regards,
Alejandro
Edited by: Alejandro Sosa on Feb 4, 2013 7:07 AM

LocalStorage reach maximum size while there are only 800 Kb data in it.

I met an localStorage exception when I call API "localStorage.setItem()" 
we are developing a web site, we used host like aaaa.bb.com the case is : 
the local storage has about 560KB Data in localstorage and then I want to set an item into localStorage, the size of the new item is 301KB 
then the browser throw exception, the content of the exception is as follows: 
 
The way I used to test the size of localStorage is: JSON.stringify(localStorage).length 
 
"Persistent Storage maximum size reached" code:"1014" nsresult: "0x80530f6(NS_ERROR_DOM_QUOTA_REACHED)" 
I tested this function in other machines and in chrome, this exception will not occur, I want to know why this exception occurs on the machine, if there is any settings in firefox? or if there is any relationship with the cache size?

the root cause is found.
the reason is that aaa.domain.com and bbb.domain.com, the two sub domain will share the same space of localStorage because they are under the same top level domain domain.com.
aaa.domain.com reach maximum size when there is only 500KB data in localStorage because there is already 4.5MB data in localStorage of bbb.domain.com.

Internal Harddrive Maximum Capacity

Does anyone know if I am able to upgrade to an internal Hitachi Travelstar 160 gb ATA harddrive in my iBook G4 (12", 1.2 ghz, OS 10.4.10, 768 GB RAM)? I have heard with ATA 100 there is a cap at 120 gb? Can anyone verify the maximum capacity the iBook will support. I am running my 30 gb stock drive and am being driven crazy by lack of space. I'd like to get as large an internal as possible for the money I have available. Thanks.
iBook G4 12" 1.2 ghz Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Hi, and welcome to Apple Discussions.
The Apple Knowledge Base article on limitations on hard drive size:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=86178
seems to indicate that the 160 GB drive should work.
Good luck with the new hard drive.

OIM Managed server is frequently reaching maximum data sources count

Hi All,
We are using OIM 11.1.1.3.0 , Weblogic Version 10.3.3,database 11.2.0.1 for one of our client bank . Recently we encountered a problem that my oim managed server is being overloaded ,when we check the error i see data sources reaching maximum count . We have increased the maximum count to 500 and still we are facing the same issue . We also find out dead-locks in the alert log . Now,i dont understand why data sources consumption is too high .
Please let us know your valuable inputs on the specific areas where we can check this .
Regards,
Nag.

Nag,
You don't need the developer to understand what code is causing the issue. You can analyse these issues using JRockit Mission Control, check these:
1-http://itnaf.org/2012/06/24/jrockit-flight-recorder-into-oim-environment/
2-http://itnaf.org/2012/08/26/jrockit-flight-recorder-analysis-into-oam-11g-environment/
I hope this helps,
Thiago Leoncio.

Reached maximum capacity of pool "eis/PRAdapterCF", making "0" new resource

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for