Rebate: Differ "Scale Base Value" between "Statistics" and "Billing Doc"
Dear SD Expert,
After I go with Transaction Code :"VOB3" (run report RV15B002), I found that "Scale Base Value" have different value between "Statistics" and "Billing Doc". And the correct value is "Billing Doc". However, the value which shows in my rebate condition now is "Statistic". Thus, my question is
How can I configure my rebate condition based on "Billing Doc" Value instead of "Statistic"? (I don't want to "Correct backlogs" anytime in changing scales based value.) Anyone please feel free in suggestion.
Thanks,
Prach
HI,
This may be useful to you.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/dd/5612d8545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm
Vrajesh
Similar Messages
-
Rebate agreement - cond. base value and scale base value
Hi,
Good day!
I just like to ask the possible reason for the <b>cond. base value</b> and <b>scale base value</b> in rebate agreement (path: rebate payments -> verification level) to contain zero values only.
thanks,
nerissa*
-
Rebate : Scale base value is showing zero
Dear Friends,
While configuring Rebate Processing I am getting following problem :
Description: We are Maintaining Condition record on basis of Product Hierarchy for Rebate agreements.
Problem : When we want to view Rebate Payments -> Verification level, the Quantity under Scale Base Value is showing zero but appropriate accruals is coming.
My end user wants apart from Cond.base value & Accruals the Scale Base Value (which shows Quantity) should also come so that he can have a idea on what value and quantity the rebate is been given.
Note: For each Product hierarchy we are maintaining one of the SKU relevant for Product hierarchy in material for settlement field.
Expecting a good answer from u all sap gurus.....
Thanks in advance.
Regards...
TusharHii There
This kind of problem was existing in my system too.
I raised this with SAP people and they told me to apply SAP note no.# 970384 after which the scale base quantity was appearing.
You could try this out.
Thanks & Regards
Gaurav Manocha -
Scale base value in rebate processing for CM /DM must not be updated
I created a rebate condition type with calculation type A (percentage) and scale basis C (qty). The billing types for credit and debet memo are set relevant for rebate (TVFK-BORVF). The value of a credit / debet memo is added to the condition base value in the rebate agreement and the quantity to the scale base value (standard). For us it is not an option to create credit and debet memos without quantity. What I need is that the value is added to the condition base value but the quantity is not added to the scale base value. How can I achiev this?
Example
standard order Qty 1100, value 11.000
CM Qty 200, value 500
Rebate agreement with scale
0 to 1000 4%
from 1000 5%
The final settlement must calculate 5% over 10.500. Currently it calculating 4% over 10.500.
Thanks in advancehi,
check out the following link:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/de/5e74c39d3211d596fc0000e835339d/frameset.htm
Regards,
siddharth. -
Scale base value with price discrepancy credit note
Hi gurus,
I have a problem in which credit notes for price discrepancies are having direct effect over scale base value in structure S060. I tried to modify the update rules, but found out this is hard coded for this structure. The other solution will be maybe to include a new pricing procedure and sales document just for discepancies, handling a fixed value condition type. Since the rebate which is experiencing the scale base value update is a quantity rebate I don´t know if it will have the desired effect.
The question is:
Is it possible to avoid the update to S060 through a user exit?
I saw RV60AFZZ could be used, but I´m not really sure if it will work to avoid quantities update ?
Thanks for your time and help.hi,
check out the following link:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/de/5e74c39d3211d596fc0000e835339d/frameset.htm
Regards,
siddharth. -
Scale base value calculation ( Pricing!!)
Hello,
I have issue, when I am creating a credit memo request (Va01 order type is customized) with reference to billing document. All the items and prices are copied properly. But the scale base value is not copied properly. In the credit memo request (order) for each an every item the scale base value is as same as condition base value. But in the invoice (billing document) the scale base value is added with the pervious item scale base value.
Actual by functionally the scale base value of item should be added with pervious item scale base value (if the items are same).
In code the FM PRICING_COPY is copied all the details correctly and then in the FM PRICING this mismatch is happening.
The scale base value is not getting added with the pervious scale base value.
I have found the condition control ( KOMV-KSTEU ) for that item is D (Fixed) in the credit memo request (order) but in the billing document the condition control is A (Adjust for quantity variance) .
I want to know what is significance of this condition control field (KOMV-KSTEU).
I didnt get much information on this field by doing F1 on this field!!!
Please give some inputs .
Thanks in advance,
Siva.Hi,
Goto transaction VOFM and in the blue menu bar click on Requirements in the blue menu bar at the top of the screen.
Here you can include your new requirements.
Regards
Karan -
Scale base value total $ based on confirmed quantities
Hi,
I have a requirement from my user and i think of a solution but wondering if there is a more standard SAP solution without programming a formula. Here is the case :
We want to give special discounts on non current material. Material that are from last season and that we want to sell all the remaining items.
So when the total $ of the line will exceed for example 100 000 $ then, the customer will have a 20 % discount but of course we want to consider only confirmed quantities as it is sold-out items. If for example, we have 100 items remaining, we don't want the customer to order 500 items in order to reach the 100 000 $ as for sure, we will never ship the 400 remaining items as we will never have more available items.
So i'm proposing the create a new discount condition type for which we will use value scale (B as a scale basis). But the scale base value should be total net price for confirmed quantites only. The solution i can do is program a scale base value formula that will multiply the confirmed quantity by the net price to obtain the total net price for confirmed quantities for the line. And also, i will have to take care of currency calculation if the document currency is not the same as the condition record currency.
Is there another way to do it more standard SAP ?
And also if i want to use group condition in order to calculate the total net price on multiple items eligible for the discount ? Will it work ? will it sum all the total net price for confirmed quantities ? (scale base value).
Thanks.
Myriam
Edited by: Myriam Catrycke on Aug 7, 2008 3:29 PMHi,
We don't want to pay retroactively but at the order time. Our customers order on line and we want them to see immediately the discount they will have.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Myriam -
Passing values between jsp and php
hi there, is it possible to pass values between jsp and
php? i really need to find out the way if there is
any. thanks in advance
-azali-Yes, there are a few ways to do this.
1) Think about using Cookies.
2) Maybe use a Redirect passing the values in the Query string.
3) Retain the data in a repository in the back end.
4) Using Hidden fields within your pages.
I am sure you can use these Idea's for a base to develop other methods on how to pass values back and forth from JSP -> PHP and vice versa.
-Richard Burton -
Difference in value Between BW and R/3
Hi,
We are in the process of validating reports .We have observed difference in value for credit and debit amount fields in BW and for the same data is coming from standard data source 0EN_JVA_2 (Joint venture: Actual line item using delta extraction) we have done full data load. In the data source the data coming from a single field and that is spited based on debit/credit indicator in R/3.
I need your valuable input on where the problem is for the difference of value between BW and R/3.
Regards
DevaHi,
Is there any filterations in the IP?
Any data packet deletion activity in the start rountine?
Any update rule for the key figure is having routine with modifiying the value?
Kindly check.
In case if you are seeing number of records, always aggregation happens.
If the difference is in terms of quantity of the key figure values, kindly check the above three.
Kindly come to us so that we can suggest
Hope this helps
Janardhan Kumar -
Use context to pass value between JPF and Java Control
hi,
Can we use context to pass value between JPF and Java Control? It works if i m using InitialContext in the same machine but i dun think it will works if i put Web server and application server in different machine. Anyone have an idea how to do it?
I also want to get the method name in the onAcquire callback method. Anyone knows how to do this?
thks
?:|Hi.
Yoy can the next options for make this:
1. Pass your values in http request.
example: http://localhost/index.jsp?var1=value1&var2=value2&var3....
2. You can use a no visible frame (of height or width 0) and keep your variables and values there using Javascript, but of this form, single you will be able to check the values in the part client, not in the server. Of this form, the values of vars are not visible from the user in the navigation bar.
Greeting. -
Activity type is mandatory: enter value between 01 and 07
Hi guys,
I would like to ask you for help..
Recently I updated the App CRM Sales to 2.0.3
Now, when I try to create an activity/task in IPhone(IOs6), it shows me this error "Activity type is mandatory: enter value between 01 and 07".
Do I need to apply any SAP note?
Does anybody have any idea?
Regards,
Eder.Hi Masayuki,
Thanks again for you help.
So, When I create an Activity/Task in CRM Backend I don´t have problem. I can see in my mobile device (Iphone).
The problem is when I try to create a new activity in App CRM Sales (Iphone).
I think that there is some obligatory field in CRM Backend, but that in App CRM there isn´t to filled in it.
Thanks, -
Alter script to keep values between 1 and 99
Hi guys, I currently have a table (for the sake of this lets call it my_table with a column my_column which is integer) I want to restrict the values of this column to values between 1 and 99 and was wondering how I would build this constraint using a script.
Thanks for any help I may recieve on this.Adding a check constraint should serve the purpose.
create table t_test
col1 integer
alter table t_test add constraint check_col1_val check (col1 between 1 and 99);
insert into t_test values(1);
insert into t_test values(99);
insert into t_test values(81);
insert into t_test values(0);
insert into t_test values(100);Running the last two insert statements will give you a error
insert into t_test values(0)
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-02290: check constraint (HI_OWNER.CHECK_COL1_VAL) violated
02290. 00000 - "check constraint (%s.%s) violated"
*Cause: The values being inserted do not satisfy the named check
*Action: do not insert values that violate the constraint. -
Select just the values between min and max of an accumulated value over day
Hello Forum,
a value is accumulated over a day and over a period of time. Next day the value is reseted and starts again to be accumulated:
with sampledata as (select to_date('09.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 23 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 29 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 30 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 45 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 60 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 75 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 95 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 17:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 23:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 14 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 34 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 58 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 70 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual)
select ts, val
from sampledata
order by ts asc;How should I change the select statement to skip all data sets before the first minimum and the duplicates after the maximum of a day in order to get such a result:
TS VAL
09.09.12 06:12 23
09.09.12 07:12 29
09.09.12 08:12 30
09.09.12 09:12 45
09.09.12 10:12 60
09.09.12 11:12 75
09.09.12 12:21 95
09.09.12 13:21 120
09.09.12 14:21 142
10.09.12 06:12 14
10.09.12 07:12 34
10.09.12 08:12 58
10.09.12 09:12 70
10.09.12 10:12 120
10.09.12 11:12 142
10.09.12 12:21 153Thank youThis solution works perfectly when the accumulated value has its low and its high on the same day. But I found out :( , that there is also data, which has its low yesterday and its high today. For a better understandig of the case, there is a machine, wich is working over 3 Shifts with irregular start and end time. For example Shift1 cann start at 5:50 or at 7:15. The accumulated value of the worked time is accumuated for each shift extra. This solution works for the shift 1 (approximate between 06:00-14:00) and for the shift 2(approximate between 14:00-22:00), because there is the low and the high of the accumulated value on the same day. This solution does not work for the shif 3(approximate between 22:00-06:00), because the high of the accumulated value is or can be the next day.
So the thread title should be: "Select just the values between min and max of an accumulated value over the same day(today) or over two successive days (yesterday and today)
Sampledata for shift 1 or shift 2:
{code}
with sampledata as (select to_date('09.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 23 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 29 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 30 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 45 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 60 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 75 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 95 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 120 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 17:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 23:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 143 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 144 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 145 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 147 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 148 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 153 val from dual)
, got_analytics AS
SELECT ts, val
, MIN (val) OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY ts DESC
) AS min_val_after
, CASE
WHEN ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY val
, ts
) = 1
THEN -1 -- Impossibly low val
ELSE LAG (val) OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY ts
END AS prev_val
, MIN (val) OVER (PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts))
AS low_val_today
, NVL ( LAST_VALUE (val) OVER ( ORDER BY ts
RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
AND ts - TRUNC (ts) PRECEDING
, -1
) AS last_val_yesterday
FROM sampledata
SELECT ts
, val
FROM got_analytics
WHERE val <= min_val_after
AND val > prev_val
AND ( val > low_val_today
OR val != last_val_yesterday
ORDER BY ts
{code}
with the expected results:
{code}
1 09.09.2012 06:12:02 23
2 09.09.2012 07:12:03 29
3 09.09.2012 08:12:04 30
4 09.09.2012 09:12:11 45
5 09.09.2012 10:12:12 60
6 09.09.2012 11:12:13 75
7 09.09.2012 12:21:24 95
8 09.09.2012 13:21:26 120
9 09.09.2012 14:21:27 142
10 10.09.2012 06:12:02 143
11 10.09.2012 07:12:03 144
12 10.09.2012 08:12:04 145
13 10.09.2012 09:12:11 146
14 10.09.2012 10:12:12 147
15 10.09.2012 11:12:13 148
16 10.09.2012 12:21:24 153
{code}
And the sampledata for shift 3 is:
{code}
with sampledata as (select to_date('08.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 23 val from dual union ALL
select to_date('08.09.2012 02:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 45 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 05:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 78 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 06:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 08:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 10:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 12:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 16:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 17:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 19:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 21:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 90 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 22:00:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 24 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 22:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 40 val from dual union all
select to_date('08.09.2012 23:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 68 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 79 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 124 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 125 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 126 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 17:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 127 val from dual union ALL
select to_date('09.09.2012 22:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 5 val from dual union ALL
select to_date('09.09.2012 22:51:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 23 val from dual union all
select to_date('09.09.2012 23:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 40 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 00:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 50 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 01:03:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 60 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 02:54:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 78 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 03:04:08', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 142 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 04:04:19', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 145 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 05:04:20', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 06:12:02', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 07:12:03', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 08:12:04', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 09:12:11', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 10:12:12', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 11:12:13', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 12:21:24', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 13:21:26', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 14:21:27', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 15:21:30', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 16:21:32', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual union all
select to_date('10.09.2012 21:21:33', 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') ts, 146 val from dual)
, got_analytics AS
SELECT ts, val
, MIN (val) OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY ts DESC
) AS min_val_after
, CASE
WHEN ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY val
, ts
) = 1
THEN -1 -- Impossibly low val
ELSE LAG (val) OVER ( PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts)
ORDER BY ts
END AS prev_val
, MIN (val) OVER (PARTITION BY TRUNC (ts))
AS low_val_today
, NVL ( LAST_VALUE (val) OVER ( ORDER BY ts
RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
AND ts - TRUNC (ts) PRECEDING
, -1
) AS last_val_yesterday
FROM sampledata
SELECT ts
, val
FROM got_analytics
WHERE val <= min_val_after
AND val > prev_val
AND ( val > low_val_today
OR val != last_val_yesterday
ORDER BY ts
{code}
with the unexpected results:
{code}
- ts val
1 08.09.2012 00:04:08 23
2 08.09.2012 22:12:13 40
3 08.09.2012 23:21:24 68
4 09.09.2012 22:21:33 5
5 09.09.2012 22:51:33 23
6 09.09.2012 23:21:33 40
7 10.09.2012 00:04:08 50
8 10.09.2012 01:03:08 60
9 10.09.2012 02:54:11 78
10 10.09.2012 03:04:08 142
11 10.09.2012 04:04:19 145
12 10.09.2012 05:04:20 146
{code}
The result should be:
{code}
- ts val
1 08.09.2012 00:04:08 23
2 08.09.2012 02:04:08 45
3 08.09.2012 05:03:08 78
4 08.09.2012 06:54:11 90
5 08.09.2012 22:00:12 24
6 08.09.2012 22:12:13 40
7 08.09.2012 23:21:24 68
8 09.09.2012 01:03:08 79
9 09.09.2012 02:54:11 124
10 09.09.2012 03:04:08 125
11 09.09.2012 04:04:19 126
12 09.09.2012 05:04:20 127
13 09.09.2012 22:21:33 5
14 09.09.2012 22:51:33 23
15 09.09.2012 23:21:33 40
16 10.09.2012 00:04:08 50
17 10.09.2012 01:03:08 60
18 10.09.2012 02:54:11 78
19 10.09.2012 03:04:08 142
20 10.09.2012 04:04:19 145
21 10.09.2012 05:04:20 146
{code}
Thank you for your help! -
GET function fails to get values between 1 and 0
Hi i have the folowing code
GET(CONTAVENDAS="PERCVOLUMECORP",FONTEDADO="INPUT",TEMPO="2011.INP",PRODUTO="%SPECIE%_IN",CANAL="NACANAL",ORGCOMERCIAL="NAORGCOM")
When the value in the PERCVOLUMECORP account, is greater or equal to 1 let's say 80, the get function returns me the correct value, but when i have a value between 0 and one, for instance 0,25, the get function returns 0 (zero)
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Leandro
BrasilHere is the entire script
**SELECT(%ANO_BD_TRAB%,[YEAR],CATEGORIA,"ID='BDTRABALHO'")
**SELECT(%ANO_BD_TRAB1%,[YEAR]+1,CATEGORIA,"ID='BDTRABALHO'")
**SELECT(%ANO_BD_TRAB2%,[YEAR]+2,CATEGORIA,"ID='BDTRABALHO'")
**SELECT(%MES_INCIO%, STARTMTH, CATEGORIA, "ID='BDTRABALHO'")
**SELECT(%MESES%,[ID],TEMPO,"MONTHNUM>=%MES_INCIO% AND YEAR=%ANO_BD_TRAB% AND LEVEL='MONTH'")
**SELECT(%MESES1%,[ID],TEMPO,"MONTHNUM>=%MES_INCIO% AND YEAR=%ANO_BD_TRAB1% AND LEVEL='MONTH'")
**SELECT(%MESES2%,[ID],TEMPO,"MONTHNUM>=%MES_INCIO% AND YEAR=%ANO_BD_TRAB2% AND LEVEL='MONTH'")
**SELECT(%CONTAS%, [ID], CONTAVENDAS, "TOPDOWNALLOC='Y'")
*SELECT(%TODOSPROD%, [ID],PRODUTO,"GRUPO='PRODUTO'")
**SELECT(%SPECIES%, [ID],PRODUTO,"GRUPO='TIPOESPECIE' AND FLAG_TOPDA='N'")
**SELECT(%SPECIES_IN%, [ID],PRODUTO,"GRUPO='TIPOESPECIE' AND FLAG_TOPDA='Y'")
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TEMPO = %MESES%,%MESES1%,%MESES2%,%ANO_BD_TRAB%.INP,%ANO_BD_TRAB1%.INP,%ANO_BD_TRAB2%.INP
*XDIM_MEMBERSET CONTAVENDAS = %CONTAS%,PERCVOLUMECORP
*XDIM_MEMBERSET PRODUTO = %SPECIES%,%SPECIES_IN%,%TODOSPROD%
*OLAPLOOKUP VENDAS
*DIM FONTEDADO="INPUT"
*DIM TEMPO="2011.INP"
*DIM PRODUTO="C_IN"
*DIM CANAL="NACANAL"
*DIM ORGCOMERCIAL="NAORGCOM"
*DIM PERCVOL:CONTAVENDAS="PERCVOLUMECORP"
*ENDLOOKUP
*FOR %CONTA% = VOLUME
*FOR %MES% = 2011.JAN
*FOR %SPECIE% = C AND %SPECIENAME% = CERVEJAS
*WHEN PRODUTO.SPECIETYPE
*IS "%SPECIENAME%"
*WHEN CONTAVENDAS
*IS "%CONTA%"
*WHEN TEMPO
*IS "%MES%"
*REC(CONTAVENDAS="%CONTA%",EXPRESSION=LOOKUP(PERCVOL))
*ENDWHEN
*ENDWHEN
*ENDWHEN
*NEXT
*NEXT
*NEXT
*COMMIT
Thanks is advance. -
Difference between invoice and billing document
Hi ,
As an ABAPer , I am finding it very difficult to find the difference between the billing and invoice.
If both are different, then how these documents are configured.
thanks
Devi ReddyHi,
No difference between invoice and billing document.
But If we want to inform the payable to the customer we use the terminalogy invoice.
Example Credit meomo, debit memo. etc ...
As there is no difference , both have the same document types.
thanks
Kuntla
Maybe you are looking for
-
TS1424 Can't get Genius Suggestions to work in new version of ITunes
Genius Suggestions used to come up automatically in previous versions. Miss that a lot!! Help menu says select Genius Playlist (where is that), select song & choose Genius Suggestions from action menu (where is that) and then click create genius pl
-
Scheduling Agreements-Error processing Shipments
When i try to make any changes to the delivery document (change/delete) created by the combination of two scheduling agreements the system shoots an error ME803 dump.txt. I looked at Note 100690 which says inconsistency and executed the correcti
-
I get the blue screen loop when I try to start my Mac-Pro. How can I get it to boot up all the way? Can anyone advise me?
-
Resize Save for Web & Devices?
My post isn't showing in my history so, I assume it didn't take. My post was this....I just upgraded from PS CS3 to CS5 Extended. Since upgrading, the "Save for Web & Devices" window is too large for my screen. It cuts off the bottom row of option
-
Overriding YouTube Export Time Limits
Hi, I'd like to use the 1440x1080 preset YouTube output option in PrE10 but it limits me to 15 minutes. I have a YouTube account that allows uploads of longer than 15 minutes. Is there a way to override this limit in PrE10? Or is there a way to rec