Rebate take on balances to be cleared

When the client went live with SAP, they uploaded the legacy rebate balances. These balances now need to be cleared. What is the correct process to do this?

One option is to do a manual FI journal to reverse the rebate accrual and create a credit memo to post to A/R and Rebate Deduction account.
Hope this helps.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Payroll's Error message: Posting balance is not cleared (period 02 / 2014 a)

    Dear Experts,
    I am new to SAP HR. And would like get help for this issue
    After EHP 6 upgarde, when process the payroll, system prompt this error message: Posting balance is not cleared (period 02 / 2014 a).
    Checked the RT and it showed that the tax employee deduction was RM90.93. But when it comes to payslip display the tax amount showed different figure of RM90.94 which might be the cause for “posting balance is not cleared” message

    Hi,
    ChecK Manoj Shakya's response in the thread.
    Posting to FI-err :3G103, posting balance is not cleared
    Cheers,
    Manoj.

  • Posting balance is not cleared (period 01/2007 A) - showing as ERROR

    Hi SDN's,
    When am doing simulation for posting, showing error as
    "Posting balance is not cleared (period 01/2007 A)".
    Plz need your valuable suggestions to solve my issue.
    Thanks for your timings,
    Kind regards,
    Saisree.S

    Hi Sai,
    check the amounts for Balance sheet accounts and Expanses account. find the difference for both the accounts. the difference might be some wage type or wage types amount.
    find the wage types and assign the accounts. then your problem will get solved.
    If the difference amoun is net payment you have to maintain the bank account number. then it will get solved.
    Kumar

  • Posting balance is not cleared (Period 06 / 2011 A) error

    Mates
    I'm trying to do a Test run; no documents are created .system throws a the error message.I realize its a common error but hoping to fix this.
    "Posting balance is not cleared (Period 06 / 2011 A)
    Message no. 3G103
    Diagnosis
    The employee has been rejected because the balance of the generated posting items has not been balanced.
    Procedure
    Check the Customizing steps for the posting characteristics for the wage types that exist in the corresponding payroll result."
    it seems to point us to T52EZ -posting charcteristics of wagetype.
    i have mapped the cost centre in 27inftp and position is default one in 1inftp.
    my symboli accounts are d001,d002,d003,d004,d005
    account assignemtn type is c-posting to expense account
    posting characteristic i have mapped wagetypes to above symbolic accounts
    say 8000-d001
    8010-d002
    for ex
    Plus/Minus Sign for Posting-+ve amounts as debot and -ve as credtit
    generated posting date for payroll periods
    in the activitws in ac system
    have assigned the symbolic accounts to expense acocunts
    i have mapped the costcentre for that employee in 27 ,im using default position in 0001.
    there is a wagtype say food allowance that hasnt been mapped to G/l ?payroll result has an amount for that say 2000.
    i have created a symbolic account but when it comes to mapping to G/L ,i have excluded one.
    would that have an impact?
    kindly share your expert views.
    No Worries
    KG

    Mates,
    infact im doing this in sandbox client ...i deleted the payroll results  tcd pu00....i once again checked the g/l mapping ,,im still getting the posting error ..im not sure if im missing anything here ..
    payresults are like below
    Payroll Results
    Personnel No.     811 mustafa mohaammed - Other Countries
    Seq. number       00001 - accounted on 02.07.2011 - current result
    For-Period        06.2011 (01.06.2011 - 30.06.2011)
    In-Period         06.2011 (Fin.: 30.06.2011)
    Table RT - Results Table
    PCRlGr Wage Salary type               WC  C1 C2 C3  Assign: AltPa  CA  BT Abs.
    Var ss gn   Un t      Rate                     Number              Amount
         /101 Total gross amount
                                                                     6,075.00
         /203 Average basis 03
                                                                       450.00
         /550 Statutory net
                                                                     6,075.00
         /559 Payment                                                    01
                                                                     6,075.00
         /560 Payment Amount
                                                                     6,075.00
         /700 Wage/salary + ER contr.
                                                                     6,075.00
         /840 Diff. to avg. month       01
                                                   13.50
    3      /001 Valuation basis 1         01
                                 26.61
    3      8000 Monthly salary            01
                                                                     4,500.00
    3      8010 Housing Allowance(25% Bas 01
                                                                     1,125.00
    3      8030 Transport Allowance       01
                                                                       450.00
    i have maintained 0027 for that employee...kndly advice if im missing anything here ,....
    No Worries
    KG

  • Balances against freight clearing account

    Hi all
    After posting GR and invoice with planned delivey cost ( Freight ) i am looking at GL account balances for freight clearing account 192100 in ledger 0L. In the report layout I am unable to see the vendor for which this freight is paid. Can anyone suggest me why vendor is not appering? Is there any configration required?
    Rraful.

    Hi,
    If you are looking G/L Balance in FBL3N ,the field Vendor is there ,may be has not been brought in to the screen. Change the layout .
    Dhruba

  • Trail balance GR/IR clearing is showing 15 lakhs  where to find iT

    hai gurus
    Trail balance GR/IR clearing is showing 15 lakhs
    where to find it apart from using T-Code MB5S,MR11
    THANKS
    chandrasekhar

    Hi
    Try F.13/FS10n Tcodes.
    Thanks

  • HT201274 What's the longest it takes to reset settings and clear data on iPod touch?

    What's the longest it take to reset settings and clear data on iPod touch?

    If you mean Settings>General>Reset>Erase all Content and Settings, it should take less than 10 minutes for 3G and later iPods. It can take hours for a 1G and 2G and the iPod should be connected to a charging source otherwise the battery may dies before it completes.

  • When is 'Clearing Balance Sheet' and 'Clearing Inc Stmt item' used?

    Hi,
    In what circumstances, clearing balance sheet item and clearing inc stmt items are used. Commonly, it's used for balance carry forward task, where system recognized the net profit for the year (in PL) and current ytd profit (in BS).
    i was trying to post the following entry via manual posting and system generated additional 2 lines:
    DR Sales 100
    CR AR 100
    DR Clearing BS item 100 < System auto generated additional one line
    CR Clearing PL item 100 < System auto generated additional one line
    (The above entry is enter at posting level 01)
    I was trying to post another  2 balance sheet items via manual posting at posting level 30. There was no additional 2 lines created.
    Please advise.
    Regards, Renee

    Rene,
    In real life there are usually closing periods in enterprises, when accountant close their books. Closing partially means that all revenues/gains and expenses/costs are summed up, and net profit in income statement calculated. During this procedure accountants usually make closing entries. After that this calculated net profit is to be transferred to balance sheet, to the retained earnings of the current year item.
    In SAP SEM-BCS there are no closing entries. Instead, the system monitors whether entries in P&L were made. The P&L hierarchy in BCS has the following structure:
    - one main node under which all revenues and expenses are gathered
    - clearing item located OUTSIDE the P&L main node (equals to net profit).
    The amount on the clearing item equals the sum of all P&L items under main node, with the opposite sign. So, the sum of P&L items & clearing item is zero.
    If the system detects postings to the items located under P&L main node, it recalculates the net profit and adjust the clearing item in P&L accordingly. Since net profit in P&L should correspond to the RE in B/S, the system adjust clearing item in B/S also. So, AT ANY MOMENT the B/S & P&L in the system correspond each other. The work of special/clearing items is like pseudoclosing.
    That's the purpose of these clearing items. And as I said earlier  they has nothing to do with balance carryforward.
    Resume: in case of postings to P&L, the net profit changes and the system adjusts net profit in P&L & B/S (adds two additional entries).
    There is NO NET PROFIT CHANGE (and additional entries) when postings made in the balance sheet ONLY (as in your case). -- (As you know, there is almost no possibility to make postings to clearing item in B/S).

  • HOW DO I TAKE A USED IPAD AND CLEAR ALL INFORMATION INCLUDING PREVIOUS OWNERS NAME, AND REGISTRATION INFORMATION

    i have an ipad someone gave me, but just resetting the factory defaults does not clear previous customers info...any idea how to do this?

    You can log out of the currently logged in account by tapping on it in Settings > Store, and Settings > General > Reset > Erase All Content And Settings should remove all of the current content from it

  • Vendor Balance does not clear Automaticly

    Hi ,
    The Issue is when there are more than one delivery getting billed for a single STO and a MIRO is triggered by IDOC, it would create multiple Invoice Verification, and as the quantity on any of them is not the same as PO, the system puts a ‘R’ block on them.
    When we have a single delivery for a STO and when it is billed we would see the Invoice Verification goes through without any block.
    Provide me the solution to find out how to avoid of the splitting of the invoice.
    Regards
    Bharti

    Hi,
    You have the MIRO Invoice tolerance limits specified in OMR6.
    1. QTY differences
    2. Price differences
    3. Date differences
    These tolerances works b/n PO/MIRO and MIGO/MIRO
    If the MIGO QTY is 100 and MIRO QTY is 50, and you have a tolerance mentioned as 5% or 10 QTY, then the invoice goes into blocked state.
    Check it.

  • Clearing of Balance in GR/IR clearing account due to date problem

    >Hi to All,
    >The scenario is like this :-
    >The client is making back dated entries for quarter between 01.04.2008 to 30.06.2008 in SAP in July 2008 as the system is getting implemented now. He wants to regularise all the transactions in SAP from 01/04/2008.
    >The users entering the data were new and hence though the miro and payment entries were made by F&A in back date. The Purchase Orders and the GRs were prepared in the current date of July 2008.
    >Because of this date problem the GR/IR clearing account is having balance in it, which should have been clear after the processing of the miro document.
    >The documents were handed over to f&a after preparation of GR in the systems for Invoice processing through MIRO.
    >Can anyone plz give a solution to clear the balance GR/IR clearing account.
    >Thanks in advance.
    >Ashutosh M Joglekar.

    Hi Muthuraman,
    No need to clear any thing for PO pending items.
    Regards
    Gitesh

  • GR/IR clearing account ledger balance discrepancy

    Hello All,
    When we are checking GR/IR (SR/IR) account ledger balance in FS10N, open items balance and some cleared item balance also coming in the FS10N. but it should only display open item balance and not cleared item balance, cleared item balance should became zero.
    Ex:- MIGO Rs 5000 was done on 01.04.2010 and the MIRO was done Rs 5000 on 01.07.2011 in the FS10N for the period 01.04.2010 u2013 30.04.2010 balance is showing 5000- credit amount but corresponding clearing entry (MIRO) is not appearing. So Rs 5000 credit appearing. Actually balance should be Zero here.
    Can any one let us know what the cause was?
    Thanks,
    Ratnam

    FS10N is showing partial balances
    debit of the month & credit of the month & balance of the month & cumulated balances.
    Choose the last one to see all.
    if you don't want to see cleared items, use FBL3N.

  • GR/IR  automatic clearing raised account balances

    Hello experts,
    could you be so kind and help me with nex scenario:
    we have done two goods receipt , then we have done miro and posted vendor  invoice
    lline items :
    migo: goods 100 /grir 100
    migo: goods 100 /grir 100
    miro:  grir 200 / vendor 200
    now when we do f.13 in local currency and check GR/IR Account Special Processing button we get next clearing documents :
    cler.doc 1
    without no line items this is ok
    clear.doc 2
    grir 200/grir 200
    it rase account balance in local currency
    MM configuration is :goods-receipt based invoice verification
    Please help me

    Miro is in local currency. Invoice is in local currency. Our CC use three currency local, group and hard. So all posted documents are posted in three currencies.
    Let me give you posted line items.
    GR/IR account balance :
    before clearing we have open items
    200 invoice/ 100 good receipt+100 good receipt = balance 200
    after clearing  :
    sap post one document without line items and another
    dr GRIR 200  / cr  GRIR 200 
    so now balance is :
    200 invoice/100 good receipt x 2 = balance 200                
    200 clear  /  200 clear               = balance 400
    200/200  before clearing  after clearing 400/400 so SAP has doubled account turnover.
    Edited by: Dusan Stojanovic on Feb 17, 2008 10:32 PM

  • POSTING ERROR-MESSAGE POSTING BALANCE NOT CLEARED FOR THE PERIOD 2/2008A

    Hi
    I have a problem in payroll posting.  While posting for one employee's persn number rejected and gave a message as Posting Balance not cleared for the period 2/2008A.  To come out of the problem I changed the Payroll status record using pu03 changed the Erliest Retro date as 01.06.2008.  Again tried to post  but not posted again same Message displayed.  After changing the Erliest Retro record I have not run the payroll for the particular employee.  Is it required to run the payroll for the employee after changing the status in PU03.  Request to guide on this
    Thanks
    EKP Yadav

    Hi there
    The posting may be out of balance for the employee because their credits dont equal their debits...
    Do a test posting for the employee with the log on, this will tell you what amounts are being posted - and should give you an inidcation of where the balance is not cleared...
    Yes, you would have to re-run the employee if you'd changed the retro date in PU03, but I dont think that will fix your posting problem....Should the employee have retroe'd?
    From what I have seen, just changing the control record doesn't usually fix an out-of balance..there is usually another reason....eg wagetype incorrectly posting to the wrong number of  accounts....or a missing wagetype on the employee (eg bank details...no /559 for the net pay to go to).
    Cheers
    Mary

  • Rebate  settlement for only cleared invoices

    Dear Guru's ,
    I gone through with the older threads and other sap notes, but as per the business requirement i need to settle rebate only the documents which are cleared in accounting is there any process which settles only for cleared documents (or) please suggest me the user exits or modifications .
    Thanks for your replies.
    chandu

    Hi Chandu,
    I am having the same business requirement, how did you finally achieved the objective of settlement against only cleared invoices.
    Your help is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Raja

Maybe you are looking for