Reclassifications in FICA

Hi Experts,
Can you give me any advice on the configuration of the Reclassifications of receivables in FICA. I need the debt to be posted to different GL accounts according to the remaining term (short, long term).
Rgs.
Edited by: RBK on Apr 23, 2008 5:20 PM

Hello,
FYI....
I have one more question, where do I set the time range to consider the debt as long term or short term... else where do I set the G/L accounts for the reclassification according to the terms?
I do not think that differentiation of long term/short debt is possible... I do not see mapping of Payterms with GL accounts either...what I suggest you is to configure Receivables & Payables account along with Summarization accounts. Run FPRECL ...and see the posting entries...may be you can regroup your config alongside with your requirement.
Do you ussually use this process to make this reclassification? or do you make this reclassification postings manually???
As suggested above Pls execute FPRECL and view the results...Unfortunately I do not have active ISU system with me...else I 'd have guided you approrpiately.
Hope this helps.
Rgds
Rajendra

Similar Messages

Por que novas abas a partir de um site (yahoo) não abrem e não dão mensagem de erro? Abro notícia em nova aba, fica em branco. No internet explorer abre normal.

Abro a página br.yahoo.com normalmente, mas quando abro uma notícia em nova aba, a nova aba fica em branco, apesar do endereço eletrônico aparecer na barra de endereços. Não aparece nenhuma mensagem de erro. No internet explorer abre tudo normal. Eu já desinstalei e reinstalei o Mozilla. Eu já Restaurei o firefox pelo site de suport do Firefox. Quando eu navego com o internet explorer não dá esse problema.

Olá,
'''Execute o Firefox em Modo Seguro''' para verificar se o problema é resolvido. O Modo Seguro é utilizado para resolução de problemas, ele desabilita a maioria dos add-ons.
Existem duas maneiras de iniciar o Firefox em Modo Seguro:
#Segure a tecla '''Shift''' quando for iniciar o Firefox através do menu Iniciar ou por um atalho.
#Execute o Firefox normalmente, vá até o menu '''Ajuda''' e em seguida clique em '''Reiniciar com extensões desativadas...'''.
''Quando o pop-up for exibido, selecione "Iniciar em Modo Seguro" ''
'''Se o problema não ocorrer no Modo Seguro''', uma extensão pode estar causando o erro e você precisa descobrir qual é a correta. Por favor, leia o artigo [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] para determinar isso.
''Para fechar o Firefox em Modo Seguro, basta sair normalmente e aguardar alguns segundos para reabrí-lo.''
''Quando você descobrir qual o problema, por favor mande um retorno! :) Isso poderá ajudar outros usuários que tenham o mesmo problema.''
Obrigado e conte conosco!

Tracing balances in reclassification account back to vendor/debtor

Hi Gurus
My client ran the balance reclassification program in September and the program was successful.Now in October the auditors requested to know which vendors and customers had the debit and credit balances respectively to explain the line items posted into the reclassification account.I used report S_ALR_87012082 & S_ALR_87012172 selecting debit balances only for vendors and credit balances only for customers as at end of September and managed to reconcile all transactions except for 5 line items.
My question: Is there anyway I can trace back these figures to the vendor or debtor account??. I have tried to rerun the reclassification for September (without generating postings but still the 5 trans are not appearing).I have also tried to see if there were any back dated transactions that were posted after the reclassification was run by checking to see document entry time in table BKPF but non were posted.
Can you please advise if there is a way I can trace back these transactions in the reclassification account to the vendor or debtor.Or an explanation as to what else might have generated these transactions.
Regards
Dedat

Hi Gurus
My client ran the balance reclassification program in September and the program was successful.Now in October the auditors requested to know which vendors and customers had the debit and credit balances respectively to explain the line items posted into the reclassification account.I used report S_ALR_87012082 & S_ALR_87012172 selecting debit balances only for vendors and credit balances only for customers as at end of September and managed to reconcile all transactions except for 5 line items.
My question: Is there anyway I can trace back these figures to the vendor or debtor account??. I have tried to rerun the reclassification for September (without generating postings but still the 5 trans are not appearing).I have also tried to see if there were any back dated transactions that were posted after the reclassification was run by checking to see document entry time in table BKPF but non were posted.
Can you please advise if there is a way I can trace back these transactions in the reclassification account to the vendor or debtor.Or an explanation as to what else might have generated these transactions.
Regards
Dedat

Standard FICA datasoources ate missing- Alternative solution

Hi All,
Our ISU system is in ECC6 with out any Ehp. CRM-2005 is connected with ISU system through middleware.
We are missing standard FICA BW datasources( 0FC_BP_ITEMS,0FC_DUN_HEADER,0FC_DUN_ITEMS) due to unavalability of Ehp in the ISU system.
If Ehp will be apply to ISU system, CRM system need to be upgraded to CRM7 which is not feasible in current time.
As per BW implementation we need to use these extractors which are based on important FICA tables.As the base table for these extractors will have huge volume of data(Utilities Industry).
Request you to help us the alternative solution for this without upgrading any Ehp in the ISU system. If we will create custom extractors performance issue may come.
I have refered the Blogs where performance issue is mentioned for custom extractor.
Regards,
Asish

You listed two of the best options possible...
1) Upgrade ECC to EHP2 and CRM to CRM 7.0.
2) Create generic DataSources from the source tables.
The only other option you would have is to create a remote-enabled FM in your source ECC environment to extract data out of the source table(s) and insert into an ITAB, create an ABAP program in your BW environment that calls the remote-enabled FM and receives the extracted data ITAB and then load that data into a custom table in BW. Then create a generic DataSource on that custom table in BW. Realize, this would pretty much be the same as creating a generic DataSource on the ECC environment, but would be more easily replaced when you do eventually update and potentailly move to the standard content DataSources.

Posting problems with FM Credit Memos SD-FICA Mess Class FKKFMCHK 018

Hi,
We use Funds Management FM, SD and FI-CA, in Public Sector, we are customizing credit and debit memos. Doing testing, we trying to post Credit Memos in FI-CA from SD, but actually system is giving a dump.
Initially, we could post some credit memos. Comparing records of two documents in VRBK, VBRP, VBAK, VBAP (One posted in FICA other non posted) didnu2019t find any difference. We check, by VF03 Account Determination Analysis and documents has the Revenue Accounts and Reconciliation Accounts expected.
We check OSS Note 686383, and other notes related with technical messages FKKFMCHK 018, and check customizing and G/L Accounts master records, and all items look right.
Base on Account Determination Analysis of the documents, we understand credit memo has items with financial transaction 60 (Business Partner related) and items with financial transaction 30 (Revenue Account Related) although, when we trying to post, by option Released to Accounting system gives this messages:
Error analysis
    Short text of error message:
    Posting not permitted; business transaction not recognized
    Long text of error message:
     Diagnosis
         You have posted a document that in Funds Management only has
         commitment items with financial transaction 60 but has no cleared
         item. The system cannot classify such postings by business
         transaction. Therefore, these postings are not permitted.
     System Response
     Procedure
         Change the way you post the business transaction.
     Procedure for System Administration
    Technical information about the message:
    Message class....... "FKKFMCHK"
    Number.............. 018
    Variable 1.......... " "
    Variable 2.......... " "
    Variable 3.......... " "
    Variable 4.......... " "
I hope some body can help me,
Best regards
Victoria Leon

GR/IR Accounts reclassification

Hi all,
I am facing the following issue can anyone provide their inputs.
Reclassification on GRIR accounts in cc 1000 is not done correctly. Reclassification of these accounts should be done on account 2464000 (Goods receipt invoices receipt adjustment), so that total balance of these accounts should be zero at period end. For May period there is a difference of over 57 million USD.
"Reclassification on account 2464000 should be done for all GRIR accounts, so that together the accounts amount to zero. In May there was a difference of 57M and for June difference is 1.2M. Unmatched debit amounts are reclassed to 1470000, and credit amounts to 2465000.
Balances June 30:
2463000-2463999     Total GR IR accounts                                       xxxx amount
2464000          Goods receipt invoices receipt adjustment         xxxxamt
                                            Difference amount                                       xxxxamt

Hi Chong,
I never used this before, to tell you the truth. But this seems to be quite straightforward: SM30, view V_T8A_BILANZ, add your controlling area, enter the value 1 (profit center balance sheets).
Then you have to populate the PC field in all B/S account line items as well (perhaps you do already). Of course, F.10 will post to b/s accounts as well.
Then, I think you should check structure SAPF100_OUTIN in SE11, if the PRCTR field is already included. If it is (should be), probably you only need to carry out F.19 and check the postings
Hope that helps, points welcome
Csaba

FICA question- Incoming payment posted to wrong account & processed as refund

Need validation if the process recommended in following scenario is appropriate & any advise would be appreciated:
We have a few contract accounts where the incoming payment was posted to worng contract account. Then instead of reversing the doc & moving it to clarification & posting to correct account , the cashier assuming the customer has made payment in error , initiated a refund & an outgoing payment doc was generated after payment run. In some cases the check was issued to the customer.
What we think the right process would be as under:
1. Reset clearing on outgoing payment doc. The incoming payment doc will now be open. There will be additional debit entry of equivalent amount for the reset clearing.
2. Reverse the incoming payment doc & post it to clarification. From Clarification , post it to correct contract account.
3. For the debit entry on the contract account, there are 2 possible scenarios for clearing:
         sceanrio 1: In case the check was sent to customer , get the customer to make the payment. This incoming payment will clear the debit entry.
         Scenario 2: If the check was stopped in time , a credit posting of equivalent amount should be posted to bring account back in balance. For standard incoming payments we use doc type IC. In this case as this is credit entered to balance account (not truly an incoming payment) can the same doc type be used or a different doc type is recommended.
I am not a FICA consultant & this might be a very basic question
Thanks in advance for any recommendations.
Satish

Receivable adjustment works like this:
Current situation:
Customer                        Revenue                               Receivable
100 |                                  | 100                                100|
After receivable adjustment, it looks like this:
Customer                        Revenue                               Receivable                  Bad Debt Expense
100 |                                  | 100                                100|                                        |
                                                                                        100                        100
Receivable adjustment does not adjust the customer balance/open items. It only takes $ from the receivables and moves them to a separate g/l account.

Reversal of reversals not permitted in case of returns&payments FICA (ISU)

We are constantly facing a problem on which we would like to have comments from you.
Problem:-
A payment comes and clears a receivable. A return is posted for the payment and the user later realizes that the return was posted incorrectly. Now, a reversal of this return is desired. SAP (ISU in FICA module) does not allow to reverse this and throws the message u201CDocument XXXXXXX can not be reversed due to reset clearingu201D.
Same is true for the reversal of a u2018payment reversalu2019

Ija,
Just a question, instead of resetting the clearing at step 4, why don't you reverse the payment document? When reversing the system is smart enough to know that this is a payment document and asks whether you would like to transfer it back to clarification. So you don't actually reverse it. If you say yes then you have two options. Leave it in clarification and wait to see what the customer wants to do. Secondly if you want to post it on account to the contract account you can do this out of clarification. If you find out later that it was the wrong contract account the sysetm again lets you reverse this document (which again puts it back in clarification) so that you can post to the correct contract account.
I think that your problem is that by reset the clearing that you lose the clarification link. When I am playing around with payments and returns I always use the reverse document first because it give the option to take it back to clarification.
Hope this helps.
Natalie

Calculation of due date based on Business Days for FICA documents

Hi All,
I am working on project where SD - FICA integration is in picture. We post some charges through SD and FICA document gets posted on relevant Contract Account.
Normally we create Sales Order using transaction VA01 and then we do Billing for this Sales Order through VF01. After billng is done, FICA document automatically gets generated.
We have following requirement to be fulfilled.
For the SD bills posted as above, I want to calculate due date of these bills based on Business Days for FICA document generated (SAP Standard calculate due date based on Calander days). We can use factory calander for calculating business days in relevant function module.
I have checked in the system and it seems that event 1330 ( FM - ISU_DUE_DATE_DETERMINE) is not working in this scenario. Is there any other FM which I can use?
Can anyone help me on this?
Regards,
Pradeep

Hello Praeva ,
The event 1330 has a sample FM FKK_SAMPLE_1330. It doesnt even have a Standard Function Module.
You need to create a Installation-Specific FM and put your code to determine the Due Date based on the logic.
Rgds
Ram Kumar.

Init without data transfer is not working in the Production box for FICA extractors

Hi Guys,
We are unable to do Init without data transfer for FICA Extractors(0FC_INVDOC_XX) from BODS system. And the job is successfully completed from the BODS end but it is not hitting the source system.. Can any one please let me know how to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Kovur

Hi,
After triggering your info pack with init without data transfer, are you able to see delta pointer at info pack-->scheduler--> init options source system.
Are getting any error message? if yes then please share here.
Thanks

SAP ISU FICA :Elimination pending clarify item

I'm working in FICA module ISU .We process a duplicate incoming payment file The other day ,so the items was accounted before but I have a payment lot duplicate incoming payment now into the FPCPL transaction .I cannot clarified them because is a duplicate incoming payment so i would like delete all the duplicate incoming payment lot and that disappear into the FPCPL transaction but without create inconsistencies into the system , but i donu2019t know how .
I really appreciate your help.
Thanks and kind regards

Hi ,
First of all it is advisable that you dont upload duplicate items .
Secondly regarding your issues use FP08 to reverse the documents that you feel are duplicate and want to remove from clarification worklist .
On the other hand you can also use the T code FCUM for write off of items from clarification worklist , for that you will have to make the settings for tansfer postings to .
Check for that option as here you can write off in mass for multiple clearing accounts .
Regards ,
Dewang T

SAP ISU FICA Posting.

Hi All,
I had a requirement which says.
When a payment is received in third party system, then we have to trigger a RFC to post payment in SAP ISU FICA.
This RFC will post the payment and return the payment document number.
what all done in the payment third party system should be posted in SAP synchronously.
Does any one have an Idea of a BAPI / RFC which i can use for this purpose.
Regards,
Himanshu Sharma

If you have PI available, you should look into the External cash desk functionality
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ESpackages/ExternalCashDesk
If you dont have PI available, then you could look into the following BAPIs:
BAPI_CTRACPAYMINC_CREATE
BAPI_CTRACPAYMINC_APPEND
BAPI_CTRACPAYMINC_RELEASE
BAPI_CTRACPAYMINC_CLOSE
Best regards,
Cristobal.

FICA -IDOC for posting the billing data from NON-SAP ISU system

Hi,
Kindly note we are implementing NON-SAP ISU with SAP FICA for the finance implementation. In this context, we ahve identified BAPI for BP and CA. We have decided to go for transaction posting through the transaction FPE1. For this, we are looking for the transaction data IDOC which is CTRACDOCUMENT_ACCOUNT (FICA Posting) in the WEDI. But it seems that it is not yet released. Can anybody help me out for this to either identify the equivalent IDOC or other method to post the data from Banner system (NON-SAP ISU ) system. We are presently not implmenting billing system in SAP ISU, but only FI system

Hi,
you can create the same...
but normal practice what we do is create swc for each system so that it is easy to maintain and easy to extend in the future..
or else follow some conventions if you are just starting the things..
HTH
Rajesh

Outgoing Payment in FICA( Cash & Bank)

Hi All,
Can anyone give idea about the above subjects.
Since i know how to post incoming payments.
In case if the customer paid overpayment or payment of security deposits.
Could anyone please give procedure with T.Code for this.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Regards,
RAM.

Hello,
In FICA, You make the Payments to the customers either
1. You have collected excess money from him
2. You have charged him excessively.
3. You have adjusted his bill resulting in payment to the customer
4. You want to pay him back the securtiy deposit
5. The customer is moving out ....net result being you owe him the money
6. Other reasons resulting in payment to the customer
In all the above cases, you have to REFUND the money to the customer....either through Bank or by cash or by Cheque...<it depends on your company policy>.....
For refund by Bank/ Cheque you can use T-Code FPY1.
For refund by Cash you can use either FPB0 or FPCJ <again depends on your project/co policy>
For payments by Bank /Cheque, you need to do the following settings
1. Define Own bank details
2.Define Bank user numbers for Payment medium
3.Define Payment methods <FQP1>
3.Define specifications for paying Co cd <FQP4>
4.Define accounts for payment program <FQC0: Posting area 1061>
5.Maintain bank selection
The path for above config is IMG\FICA\Business Transactions\Payments\Incoming outgoing payment creation.
For configuration of Cr Card payments,<Posting by FPB0>, You need to configure in IMG\FICA\Business Transactions\Payments\Payment cards\ Define Accounts for Payment card Institute & Define Specifications for Posting Settlement Document
For configuration fo Cash desk payments<FPCJ>, you have make the settings in IMG\FICA\Business Transactions\Payments\Processing incoming and outgoing payments Cash desk Cash journal
Hope this helps
Rgds
Rajendra

Integration SD-FICA: Avoid cancellation cleared documents

Hi Experts:
When i try to cancel a billing document who was cleared, the system permit it. I know you can avoid this for accounting documents who was created in FI-AR, but with FICA I can´t find the routine to avoid the cancellation. Does anybody know the routine for integration SD with FICA?
Thanks
Best Regards
Gina

Dear,
thank you for your feedback.
in VOFA the flag is not ticked.
The problem was that In VFX3 no data were found for the specified document (with all "Inclomplete Due To" check box flagged), even if invoice and relative cancel were already created, but not posted.
When we tryied to to post them, via VF02 for example, the system didn't warned anything specific and, doing the posting via debug, we discovered that the posting was stopped because VBRK-RFBSK = E = "Billing Document Cancelled".
So, forcing via debug that value = ' ', because of the urgency of Finance Office, we could invoice it and then do the same for its cancel.
So at the moment it is not possible for me to reproduce the error in the system.
The only workaround I can imagine, is to find a way to avoid cancel creation if invoice is not posted yet.
Do you think this is feasible way?
Thank You veyr much for your suggestions.
KR
Raffaella
Edited by: Raffaella Sacchetto on Nov 29, 2010 3:43 PM

Reclassifications in FICA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for