Rectro Calculation of Conveyance
Dear,
Am getting error in the calculation conveyance during rectro ..... only the rectro component amount is getting for the total month.
pl share if any one face such kind of issue
Senario:-
At our client all the wage type will be on fixed percentage basis of Basic pay wage type
Issue - 1
if we increase the pay structure of any employee it need to show the difference amount only but conveyance it is taking the total amount . Rest of the wage types shows perfectly as per the values.
Issue - 2
In the same way if we change the time record for any employee also it behaves in the same manner
Ex- Suppose we mark the employee in the Last month 2 unpaid leaves wrongly when it come to notice to get the balance pay to the employee we just delete the created record to get effect of those values in the current month
During rectro calculation Basic, HRA, all the wt shows the values for 2 days only but the conveyance wage type shows for total month
Earnings Deductions
Basic Salary 8,000.00 Ee PF contribution 960.00
House Rent Allowance 3,200.00 Prof Tax - split period 200.00
Education Allow. 320.00 CF Pf monthly 240.00
Conveyance Allowance 1,920.00
Medical / LTA Amount 1,600.00
Basic Salary Arrears 2,000.00
House Rent Allowance Arr 800.00
Education Allow. Arrears 80.00
Conveyance Arrears 1,920.00
LTA /Medical Arrears 400.00
HI
Thanks for the response
The Value is effecting in Net pay, in IN42 and IN43 we mentioned in the same like we maintained for other components ,
The conveyance amount is reflecting in both RT's that is last and current but in the current it need to take the diffrence but it is taking the total amount
Regards
Rajesh k
Similar Messages
-
For the mid month new joiner the annual Conveyance exemption is coming incorrectly
Dear All,
For one of our client, we have have faced a uniqe issue.
If any employee join in the mid of the month, his prorated conveyance amount ( wage type 2020) is coming correctly. Suppose an employee joined at 16th of the month, system is calculating his conveyance for that month as INR 400 and which is correct.
However in his tax calculation for that particular month, system is taking INR 400*(rest of the month of the FY) in the wage type /4E3. which is incorrect. Suppose he joined in 16th April , system is calculating tax exemption 400*12=4800
Now if we run next month payroll , system is caculating the exemption properly. i.e. INR 400 + 800* rest of the month of the FY,
Please help
Regards
TirthaHi Tirtha,
system is calculating perfectly.
first of all system check the no. of present days and accordingly it give the amount in the wage type /3C3 conveyance amount monthly and /3C4 will give Conveyance monthly exemption and it will multiply with no. of months to the fiscal year end and store in the wage type /4E3.
for example check for PF:
Every month PF amount store in WT /3F1 and send to /3F5 and this WT multiplied with No. of months and store the Annual amount in wt /3F6.
Regards,
Praneeth kumar -
Issues in Conveyance Allowance amount in Exemption U/S 10
New issues rise Now....
For New (mid month) joinee at the first month Exemption U/S 10 is calculated based on the Conveyance Allowance amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax Exemption U/S 10 based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
For example :
Employee X,
Joined date 15.08.2011,
Conveyance Allowance = 800 INR. Earned Conveyance Allowance for 15 days = 400 INR.
While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /130 Exemption U/S 10 = 3,200 (400*8). Based on this Conveyance Allowance The Exemption U/S 10 calculated, But I want to calculated the Exemption U/S 10 at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
August month earned Conveyance Allowance = 400 INR + Actual Conveyance Allowance per month =800*7 =5,600.
Exemption U/S 10 = 6,000 INR.
Please give me some solution
Thanks and regards
Mohan .V
Edited by: mohantamilan on Sep 23, 2011 5:27 PMHi,
I think for your earlier thread someone had replied that in the 1st month your calculations will be as per the actual received amounts for mid month joinees,however when you run the second payroll for this employee the system shall consider full attendance and Conveyance shall be 800 x remaining months + the already populated 400 in RT Tables.
After you run the first Payroll live you can check the 2nd payroll with simulation may be this will clear your doubt.
Salil -
Hi Dears,
We are doing payroll configurations for one of our client in india, Regarding our requirement ,we jus tried in test system, we have written a pcr rule stating 01st feb 2015, new allowance need to paid to employees belonging to L&T1 pa and LT ESG.. Allowance will be percent based on gross pay..allowance percentage differs according to the ESG..
Before writing the PCR, Allowance percentage has been maintained in T511K.. And have configured as payroll constant ZTST 1 should be calculated with a value 2%.
i have created a new wage type 9021 allowance wage type and this wage type amount should be automatically generated in payslip based on the pcr i have written while running payroll for an employee.
EARNINGS DEDUCTIONS
l&t basic pay 9000 54838.71 INCOME TAX
l&t conveyance 9100 2741.94 12394.00
l&t hra 9200 4387.10
l&t allownace 9021 1239.36
TOTAL Gross amount 63,207.11 Take Home pay (net pay) 49,573.75
But the actual net amount should be 50,813.11..Based on the allowance wagetype i have created which is automatically generting using the pcr i have written , is getting calculated in the gross amount..
but not getting added in net amount .so please help me out guys on how to solve this issue???
Regards,
Surya PrabhaHi Remi,
Thanks for your kind reply, yes these values are taken from the remuration statement of a particular pernr whom am running the payroll..
i have checked the processing classs and i have maintained 5 and 70 which add this new allowance amount to my net amount. now the net amount is proper.
EARNINGS DEDUCTIONS perks/other income/exemptions
l&t basic pay 9000 54838.71 NCOME TAX l&t leave encashment 1239.36
l&t conveyance 9100 2741.94 12416.00
l&t hra 9200 4387.10
TOTAL Gross amount 61,967.75 Take Home pay (net pay) 50 791.11
Regards,
Surya Prabha -
Hi
We have a requirement where the client wants only VAT to be posted in GL accounts and not the price.For this I tried free goods condition type R100 with AltCBV 28.But the VAT value is also coming zero. I want the VAT to be calculated on Pricing condition and then give 100% discount.
Apart from this I also tried to make pricing condition statistical and calculate VAT on it but then also system gives zero value for VAT.
Also wondering if the scenario can be addressed with Free of Change Dellivery.Hi
Normally in scenario where you are dealing with samples , there are cases you have to charge only TAXES / EXCISE part.
Here my SUGGESTION is you can handle this through a simple sales order process, where you have to configure a new pricing procedure.
1. Create a new document type to handle samples.
2. Create a New pricing procedure where you can keep the basic price condtion as Statistical and rest all same as wht is is there your main pricing procedure. Just juggle with the TO-FROM to capture the TAX part in the total.
3. Doc pricing procedure will help you to pick the new Pricing procedure
4. Now Process this as a normal sales order
5. This new document type will help you to have a proper reporting.
The only constraint here is USER has to punch a fresh order seperately for such scenario. He cannot give a free good in the same sales order which is used as standard.
The other way is you can configure a FREE GOOD Determination procedure as suggested where you need to then have your Single pricing procedure accomodating the same scenario.
Thanks
RB -
Hi Everyone
I used this in SP calculated column field.
=IF([Shift Sched]="1pm to 10pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="2pm to 11pm","1",IF([Shift Sched]="3pm to 12am","2",IF([Shift Sched]="4pm to 1am","3",IF([Shift Sched]="5pm to 2am","4",IF([Shift
Sched]="6pm to 3am","5",IF([Shift Sched]="7pm to 4am","6",IF([Shift Sched]="8pm to 5am","7",IF([Shift Sched]="9pm to 6am","8",IF([Shift Sched]="10pm to 7am","8",IF([Shift
Sched]="11pm to 8am","7",IF([Shift Sched]="12pm to 9am","6",IF([Shift Sched]="1am to 10am","5",IF([Shift Sched]="2am to 11am","4",IF([Shift Sched]="3am to 12pm","3",IF([Shift
Sched]="4am to 1pm","2",IF([Shift Sched]="5am to 2pm","1",IF([Shift Sched]="6am to 3pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="7am to 4pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="8am to 5pm","0",IF([Shift
Sched]="9am to 6pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="10am to 7pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="11am to 8pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="12pm to 9pm","0"))))))))))))))))))))))))
it was able to work fine however my issue is when i extract the information to excel and use a pivot table the table is not able to calulate the sum of the value for this field. Can you please help me with this. this is for an Attendance traker for Night
Differential pay for employees. they create a daily log of their shift schedule and if i summarize this in pivot the value in the calculated field for this is not getting the sum.
Thanks,
NormanHi Everyone
I used this in SP calculated column field.
=IF([Shift Sched]="1pm to 10pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="2pm to 11pm","1",IF([Shift Sched]="3pm to 12am","2",IF([Shift Sched]="4pm to 1am","3",IF([Shift Sched]="5pm to 2am","4",IF([Shift
Sched]="6pm to 3am","5",IF([Shift Sched]="7pm to 4am","6",IF([Shift Sched]="8pm to 5am","7",IF([Shift Sched]="9pm to 6am","8",IF([Shift Sched]="10pm to 7am","8",IF([Shift
Sched]="11pm to 8am","7",IF([Shift Sched]="12pm to 9am","6",IF([Shift Sched]="1am to 10am","5",IF([Shift Sched]="2am to 11am","4",IF([Shift Sched]="3am to 12pm","3",IF([Shift
Sched]="4am to 1pm","2",IF([Shift Sched]="5am to 2pm","1",IF([Shift Sched]="6am to 3pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="7am to 4pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="8am to 5pm","0",IF([Shift
Sched]="9am to 6pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="10am to 7pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="11am to 8pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="12pm to 9pm","0"))))))))))))))))))))))))
it was able to work fine however my issue is when i extract the information to excel and use a pivot table the table is not able to calulate the sum of the value for this field. Can you please help me with this. this is for an Attendance traker for Night
Differential pay for employees. they create a daily log of their shift schedule and if i summarize this in pivot the value in the calculated field for this is not getting the sum.
Thanks,
Norman -
If statement in Custom Calculation Script
I have 16 fields and if even one of them ="1" I have to list it in another field. I do not want to count or sum. If one of those fields has a 1 in it I just want the other field to display Y and if none have a 1 I want that field to display N.
Please help.
Thank you in advance~mjcYou need to write a compound logical statement to evaluate all of the values and that statement needs to evaluate to true or false.
Do you know how to write JavaScript?
Do you know how to enter JavaScript calculations into a form field?
For custom calculation of the text field I could write something like:
// define an array of the field names to check
var aNames = new Array("Text1", "Text2", "Text3", "Text4",
"Text5", "Text6", "Text7", "Text8",
"Text9", "Text10", "Text11", "Text12",
"Text13", "Text14", "Text15", "Text16");
// define a logical variable that is true if any field has a value of 1 - default is false or no field has a value of 1
var bMatch = false;
// value for text field
var TextValue = 0;
// logical value of field being equal to 1 test
var FieldIs1 = false;
// loop through all the fields and test the fields value
for(i = 0; i < aNames.length; i++) {
// logically OR the result of field i value equal to true with bMatch
// get the value of field
TextValue = this.getField( aNames[i] ).value;
// test the value of the field
FieldIs1 = Number(TextValue) == 1
// logically OR the 2 values
bMatch = FieldIs1 | bMatch;
} // end field processing
// set the field value
if(bMatch == true) {
event.value = "Y";
} else {
event.value = "N";
You will need to change the field names to match your fields. You can add more field name or remove field names as needed and the script will adjust for the number of field names. -
If statement in calculated batch characteristic (dependencies)
I have a little problem with calculating a certain batch characteristic.
The situation is the following:
I have batch char A, batch char B and batch char C. Batch char C is the result of the sommation of char A and B. The problem I have now is that batch char C only should be calculated when batch char A and B are different from 0.
I have a custom build interface that imports QM data to the batch chars. Default, all my batch chars are set to 0 so if I just say $self.charC = $self.charA + $self.charB, I always get a value.
Is it possible to some sort of IF statement to check if the value is different from 0?Dear,
You need to try with variant table
take all the combination and enter in a variant table and see the result...it works
example
A B C
0 0 space
0 1 sapce
1 1 space
I hope you got it -
Pension not calculated when EE is hired mid-month
Hi All
Please suggest for the following....
When an Employee is hired in the middle of the month, the system doesn't calculate Pension Contribution.
Like if an EE is hired on 10th April. The system will calculate all payments & deductions, but it is not calculating the Pension Contributions.
I am maintaining IT 169, 171 for Pension Contribution.
The problem I found behind this is.....(WIth the help of an ABAPer)
-: System checks the Payroll Period Start Date with the Org. Assignment start date. When it doesnu2019t match, the system does not calculate the Pension Contribution.
For the time being I solved this through the following action -: In debugging, I canceled this condition (skipped this check). Then it calculated the Pension Contribution.
But, this is not the right solution for achieving that as we are changing standard SAP coding.
Please suggest any solution for the same.
Thanks & RegardsIf your schema has p0169 with BEG that will happen, try put below Param1 which fits your requirement.
BEG
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period begin date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record ends
within the current payroll period.
END
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period end date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record begins
within the current payroll period.
CHK
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll check date (the pay date),
regardless of whether the check date falls into the payroll period
itself.
A record whose validity starts after the end date of the current payroll
period is still evaluated if the check date (which lies in the future)
falls within the validity period of the infotype.
FRST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The first intersection is taken to
determine the full period deduction amount which is stored without
proration.
LAST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The last intersection is taken to determine
the full period deduction amount which is stored without proration. -
I am bringing a fixed asset system online in SAP and during the legacy conversion it was realized that the test system is not calculating the depreciation using a mid month convention. That being said looking at the configuration the company code was setup in 2005 and is in production and is productive (since 2005). So it appears that this setting is global and SAP will not allow me to change these settings to allow mid month calculations. Is this correct? anyone ran across the same issue.
Hi
please read the note 2993 and 39416!
Best Regards,
Blaz -
Mid month action_Pension (/3f4) calculation wrong
Hi All,
I get one problem , when payroll run for employee, whose action run in the mid of the month. for ex. 15.05.2010(Transfer action)
In that case the pension amount (/3f4) is calculating double or more than 541...which is wrong.
Kindly provde the input to resolve the same....
Regards,
Mahesh
Edited by: Mahesh Shewale on Sep 1, 2010 1:08 PM
Edited by: Mahesh Shewale on Sep 2, 2010 7:18 AMHi Mahesh,
Please make changes in User exit provided as per your requirement and then check the results
There are 2 user exit
EXIT_HINCALC0_002 for pension basis.
EXIT_HINCALC0_007 -
''Prepare interest on arrear calculation''
Dear Sap Gurus,
Under Prepard interest on arrears calculation there are 4 options available 1. open and all cleared items, 2.open items and items cleared with payment, 3.no open items -all cleard items, 4.no open items -only items cleared with a payment. My doubt is When and where we have to use these options. Could you explain with examples.
Thanks in advance
Thanks&Regards,
Periasamy.MUsuallu we select Open and All Cleared Items
Remaining options purely based on the client interest calculation requirements. -
Hi
I hv configured the interest calculation as shown below
1.Define interest calculation type (item interest calculation)
2.Define number ranges for interest forms(for xxxx company code)
3.Prepare Interest on Arrears Calculation(selected open and all cleared items, calender type F)
4.Define reference interest rates
5.Define Time-Based Terms
6.Enter Interest Values
7.Assign Forms for Interest Indicators
i have made postings in customer both open and cleared items for testing
but i got message"list contains no data"
do i need to make any other config.
useful answers would be rewarded with points
Regards
PrasadHi Prasad
PLease check whether Customer master records are assigned with correct "Interest Indicator" at company code data.
Best reagards,
S. Habib Pasha. -
Interest calculation on Open items and cleared items
Dear Experts
I am trying to do needful configuration for interest indicator on which interest can be calculated for open items and cleared items as well. But, system is calculating interest for open items properly, but not calculating interest on cleared items with same interest indicator, I am repeatedly getting error "interest calculation indicator is not compatible with this type of interest calculation"
Is it possible to use same interest indicator for open line items and cleared line items of customer?
If possible, request you share the needful config steps to do same.
points will be awarded for usful reply.
Best regards,
S. Habib Pasha.Hello Habib,
depending on the requests you can setup a item interest calculation or a balance interest calculation "Define calculation types".
IIC: check settings (item selection, all cleared items, only items with payment, no cleared items) "Prepare item interest calculation"
I guess you have setup the item interest calculation - maybe you have mixed some entries with BAIC.
Check in "Prepare account balance interest calculation" whether you have entries with the indicator you want to use.
At least check your entries in "Define time-based Terms" If you have entries with Balance account interest calculation the system gives even an error.
Hope this is helpfull.
Best regards
Horst -
Hi All,
When I checked table MHND, the dunning interest is calculated in such a way that it doesn't consider the previous dunned date.
Meaning :
Dunning ran on 12-01-09 interest calculated is 500.00 ( 2 docuemnst considerded from bsid as seen from table MHND )
Dunning ran on 15-01.09 interest calculated is 500.00 ( same as above)
Ideally for Dunning ran on 15-01.09 , it should not calculate interest since on 12th it is done..!!
Now queries:
1. Where can i see these interest calculated during dunning run ( any report ? ) other than table..? In std SAP, is this interest
calculated and shown only in the dunning letter ..? Does it have any other financial impact on outstanding..?
2. when I try to run the single dunn. notice, and see sample print out it gives message as
Account D 0004298846 is blocked by dunning run 20090319 MDUN1
why is it so and how to resolve..?
thanks,
Nehacan some one provide some advice on this..?
thanks,
Neha
Maybe you are looking for
-
Windows vista installer script errors
I have been unable to install certain pgms or windows vista updates because the installer gets a "script error". This occurred after IE v9 was automatically installed a year ago. I am looking for advice on how to repair the Vista OS because all repa
-
Logical Standby Database Not Getting Sync With Primary Database
Hi All, I am using a Primary DB and Logical Standby DB configuration in Oracle 10g:- Version Name:- SQL> select * from v$version; BANNER Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production CORE 10.2
-
How to position a table to display at the bottom of the page using XSL-FO
hi al, i have a set of codes that creates a table and displays on the first row of the page. i want it to display on the bottom of this page. how do i do that? example code i have is <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0
-
Transferr of songs between ipod and computer
Recently reformatted computer's hard drive, restored Itunes library with no problem. But when I connect ipod, get message that certain songs are in protected wma format and cannot be trandfered. i understand the protective format scenario, but don't
-
Why don't iTunes 11 get update of apps by syncing the already updated apps on iPad or iPhone?
Please help!!! So annoying...coz it is too much waste the time waiting for every devices apps updated.