Regarding a member assignment bug

Hello All,
I have a calc script that looks like this:
     Fix("Traffic", "Sales")
          "Total Week"(
          "Total Week"="All Days";
     Endfix
As you can understand, "Total Week" is a calculated member that gets value from a dynamic calc member "All Days" which has individual day input members. The above script is not assigning value to "Total Week" for only "Traffic" account. But above script worked for the other account, "Sales".
Then, I modified the script as below and it worked for both accounts!! Can anyone tell me why the above script did not work for "Traffic" account but "Sales" Account? I appreciate your help!
     Fix("Traffic", "Sales")
          "Total Week"(
          "Total Week"=@SUM(@CHILDREN("All Days"));
     Endfix
Thanks!

Hi Jayamani,
Very doubtful this is a bug.
If I had to guess I bet the Traffic member is also a dynamic calc member. Is that true? If that's true then it's the order Essbase is doing operations. You could solve like you did or perhaps add a two-pass tag on Traffic.
See page 103 in the Database Admin Guide (DBAG).
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/esb_dbag.pdf
May be best to do as you have done.
Regards,
John A. Booth
http://www.metavero.com

Similar Messages

Controller Assignment - Bug

I have two issues with the Controller Assignment window. It has only a few manual assignments, the QuickAccess and a few MIDI faders from my PC1600 MIDI controller.
1) Most of the time when I get a Logic crash, it wipes out all the assignments in the Controller Assignment window. After a reboot the whole page is blank and everything is gone. It looks like the Logic crash corrupts the "com.apple.logic.pro.cs" file where the information is stored.
2) Now a have a new issue. I can't make any new assignments in that window. When I click the "Learn Mode" button the parameters above will show up and disappear right away. Seems like the Button doesn't stick. If I erase Logic's preference file "com.apple.logic.pro.plist" then it will work again. I'm not ready to toss my preference file. Besides redoing all the settings in the Preference Settings window, I would loose my custom Color palette and all the Favorite checkboxes in the Apple Loop Browser. (To store those information in the preference file is a stupid idea in the first place,. Even I sent Apple lots of feedback since L7, it is still there and therefor completely useless for exactly that reason.)
Does anybody have the same problem or maybe a solution regarding the Controller Assignment?

I'm sorry to say that i have a mackie logic control and 8 wiped out the hardware chip. i know everyone say's software can't effect hardware but we now know it's true. I don't have a solution but apple doesn't know how to fix it either. I have had so many problems with 8 that Apple gave me a new computer because it corrupted my system software. The logic techs i spoke with suggested backing down to 7.10.11 and tiger. when i had my studio running on 7 everything worked perfectly. supposedly there are a lot of people out there that have no problems with 8 but there are some very serious issues, I suggest you call the support guys for your board and apple for 8. I spent the last 8 weeks trouble shooting one thing or another. Be careful some things created more problems. I wish you luck and I'm sorry I couldn't help more. Just so you know I erased my hard drive twice and the second time i went one at a time to try and figure if maybe something else was effecting everything.
guess what the 3rd item was 8 and everything went down hill again. finally apple replaced the computer and i'm definitely not using 8. good luck

Problem in creation of FSV regarding where to assign the specific GL acct

Dear All,
Currently i am working on creation of Financial Statement Version, and have some doubt regarding some of GL account as to where it will get assigned.
1.Consumption of RM or SFG
2. Cost of Production of FG
3. Cost of Good Sold.
Kindly also tell the relation between the above GL and how it will effect the Balance sheet. and why this is used for.
Example is below
1. At the time of issue of RM material to Production order
Consumption of RM 100
To Inventay of RM          100
2.*At the time of Confirmation of FG *
Inventory of FG                           120
To Cost of Production of FG              120
3. At the time of PGI
Cost of Good Sold     120
To Inv of FG                      120
Thanks in advance
Regards
Shayam
Edited by: Shayam_210 on Aug 9, 2010 9:33 AM

hi,
These are all P&L GL accounts and need to be allocated under profit and loss accounts node.
Under that profit and loss node, there may be diff sub items also.
Sub item has to be decide d by you depending upon the FSV structure in your org.
Regards,
Srinu

Regarding Free goods assignment

Dear All,
We have issue on free goods assignment, Our Company introducing the new promotional offer for products. Earlier we had a so many offers like one car to one car free, we can easily assign the free goods through t.Code VBN1, but this time this is very difference issues. Our company giving the offer to some selected customers who are booking the 3 cases main product they are getting the one case other product free. How configure in SAP?
 3 cases of Product A they getting the 1 cases of Product B.
 15 Cases of product C they getting 2 Cases of Product D.
Answers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Shankar G.

Hi,
This requirement can also be mapped through transaction VBN1 only.
3 cases of Product A they getting the 1 cases of Product B.
- Go to VBN1, specify condition type NA00 and Press Enter
- Here enter Product A, min. qty as 3 and For as 3 and Free goods category as 2 i.e. Exclusive. Now you will get an additional column as "Additional material for free goods", under this column enter material code of Product B there and Additional quantity of Product B as 1.
- Save and then try creating sales order of Product A.
15 Cases of product C they getting 2 Cases of Product D.
- Try in similar way as suggested above.

Forms 9i variable assignment BUG

Hello All,
I've been working with Forms 9i for a while now and on my current form and I am experiencing very weird bugs.
All bugs seem to have the same nature of an Assignment taking place where the bug will occur.
My form is a block to block form , not Master-detail relationship. On my first screen, I have 1 block (with a few fields on the last screen). That belongs to one table. I then have another block, a child to the first block. Then I have a third block for yet a child of the child of the first block. Then I have a last screen with the few fields of the first block. So I have 4 screens and 3 blocks, with a Dummy block for some side processing. Each screen is connected with a BACK and NEXT button and I have various other buttons on the first like BROWSE, QUERY, CANCEL, NEXT, PREVIOUS etc. With SAVE, DELETE, SAVE AND EXIT. Etc
Example #1:
I started noticed weird activity when I was getting an Exception of some type occuring on the WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED trigger of any button where in the trigger code there was an ASSIGNMENT. ex. :dummy.text := 'Normal';
My Solution: Was to avoid having forms compile your module for you on the fly when you run the form. I compile mine manually after each change I make to it. I no longer encountered this problem.
Example #2:
Text 'Normal Mode' were appearing in a few of my fields, different fields at different times this bug occurred. This text is familiar to my form and I use it in a non-editable field on the form to show the user they are in normal mode. But when I then run the form in debug mode to see the form repeat this act of placing that text into the inappropriate field (when there is no code present in the form where I have access to, that would accomplish this) the bug doesn't occur and the form seems to then work fine (with help in compiling the trigger where the bug was occurring).???
No solution, accept to run in debug mode and it goes away.. magicallly..?
Example #3:
Same deal as the second one, but this time the result of the text being placed in an inappropriate field ends up saved into the database and that is just not GOOD,haha.
I located where the bug was occurring in my form. All of a sudden when I used any of my Save and Exit buttons to save and leave the form , the form then asks me to save changes which none were made, but(as I later found out) there were changes being made. The text '5' would appear in a phone number field, when it last had a phone number. And this would then get saved into the database by pressing yes to save changes in the form. Then in the database it would be '5' saved in the phone number. And when I next drew up the record from the database in the form, it would display a '5' there. In the Save and Exit buttons is a When-Button-Pressed trigger that has a few lines of code. First I set the :system.message_level := '5' then to '0' AFTER my COMMIT;
I noticed both values appear either in the form or in the database (in the phone number fields) either 5 or a 0.
I came to the conclusion that the bug is that it places the text of 5 from my lines of code into the phone number and I have no idea why. Maybe there is a problem with the addressing of fields in the form? Maybe its corrupted? Maybe its a bug of oracle?
But it always has to do with assignments in triggers. I ran it in debug to see if it repeats, and it didn't. It fixed itself AGAIN.
I just wanted to write this long drawn out message of my experiences with the Buggy Forms 9i Designer Tool.
Would really appreciate any feedback if anyone ever expereiences any of this.
Thank you!
Ken

Ken, its impossible to be define about your problem without looking at a simple test case but a couple of observations that I can make which may help you.
If seems to "extreme" and "random" a bug to be something which is fundemental in Forms. I assume you are not able to reproduce on a simple EMP test case...
What I think the problem is, given the symptoms and the workarounds, is that you are making chages to Forms/libraries and you are running against "old" copies of FMB or PLLs.
For example, I often see situations where the user makes a change to a PLL and does not recompile a form which uses that PLL (or infact picks up and old version of the pll or fmb). Forms then tends to give erroneous assignments and doing things like running in debug forces recompilation of the correct files and hence it goes away.
As I mentioned, its difficult to get to the bottom of this without a stand alone test case but I think that by trying to reproduce on a simple test case you will infact narrow down the problem to one that is more likely to be a set up issue specific to your application rather than a bug in forms in general.
Hope that helps
Grant Ronald
Forms Product Management

Regarding problem with assigning field to Field symbols

Hi All,
We are migrating(recreating) the program which was in 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
In 4.7 they are using the below code for assigning the field to fieldsymbol from work area as shown below.
ASSIGN wa_kostl_kstar-wkg001+offset TO <von>
wa_kostl_kstar is a work area and wkg001 is the fourth field and wkg011 is 13th field and it is taking this filed into field symbol <Von>.
In Ecc 6.0 th same code is not being accepted and throwing syntax error.
So they had changed the code in ECC 6.0 to
ASSIGN wa_kostl_kstar-wkg001+(offset) TO <von>
And there was no syntax error and while testing it goes to dump.
I had tested in 4.7 and its working fine taking the value of 13 th field to <von>,and like wise there are some other assign statements after,like this.
So any one please let me know what to do in this case.
Regards,
MADHAVA.

Hi,
Hope below example can give you an idea on handling your case:
TYPES: BEGIN OF t_sal_ord,
         vbeln TYPE vbeln_va,
         posnr TYPE posnr_va,
         auart TYPE auart,
         vkorg TYPE vkorg,
         matnr TYPE matnr,
       END OF t_sal_ord.
DATA: wa_mara TYPE mara.
DATA: wa_sal_ord TYPE t_sal_ord.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_matkl>,
               <fs_vkorg>.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'MATKL' OF STRUCTURE wa_mara TO <fs_matkl>.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'VKORG' OF STRUCTURE wa_sal_ord TO <fs_vkorg>.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
Kind Regards
Eswar

Query regarding Purchase Org assignment

Hi All ,
I have a understanding that PORG assignment to PLANT is ALWAYS MANDATORY to create a purchase order in that plant but assignment of PORG to Company code is not mandatory ( as in case of Company group wide PORG i.e centralized PORG).
Is that correct ?
Also is there any way to create a Purchase Order without PLANT ( suppose if I make PLANT field optional in PO screen) , what could be the impact ?
regards
Shrey

I have a understanding that PORG assignment to PLANT is ALWAYS MANDATORY
to create a purchase order in that plant but assignment of PORG to Company code
is not mandatory ( as in case of Company group wide PORG i.e centralized PORG).
Is that correct ?
You assign PORG to Plant and Plant is assigned to Company Code, so it is automatically assigned to the company code through plant
> Also is there any way to create a Purchase Order without PLANT ( suppose if I make
PLANT field optional in PO screen) , what could be the impact ?
Why do you want to create Purchase Order without Plant. How will you track which plant will receive the material and where the material needs to be placed.
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 22, 2010 11:25 AM

Issue regarding Business Role assignment

Hi All,
1.
I have a user Agent1 which is assigned to position POS_IC_AGENT in my org structure.
In the infotype Business Role I have assigned IC_AGENT (standard) business role.
IC_AGENT has PFCG role SAP_CRM_UIU_IC_AGENT assigned to it.
But, when I run the application (for my user Agent1), only telephony buttons are visible on top, navigation bar and work area is empty (nothing is visible there)
2.
Now, when I open my user Agent1 in SU01 and assign PFCG role SAP_CRM_UIU_IC_AGENT.
Now when I run the application everything is visible (telephony, navigation bar and workarea).
Why is it not visible in first case?
I think it should work without assigning Role in SU01.. I mean it should have taken settings from Org. structure
Regards,
Ashish

Hi Ashish,
As far as work center page context is concerned , its decided by the navigation bar profile and business role customizations ( we add work center home and several related stuff etc in navigation bar profile and make them activate/deactivate, visible/invisible through business role customizing ) .
PFCG role has nothing to do with what you see on the Work Center...it decides whether you can see or not..meaning whether you have authorization for disply of a business object and its related subobjects.
PFCG role basically determines the authorization objects that will be grated to the particular business role ( to which this PFCG role is linked ) PFCG is about CREATE/CHANGE/DELETE authorizations.
In first case, its business role linked authorizations. You dont see the work centers may be because USER has not granted the DISPLAY authorization for the business Object related to BP( i.e Account ) , or BO related to account search (BUPASEARCH ) as the IC agent home basically has Account identification home , or account search home...which overrides the PFCG authorizations attached to the business role.
Remember, individual object authorizations set for a user using transaction PFCG will have more priority over the Business role linked authorizations as 1 business role can be assigned to many users however if one user is not grated to see BP related data, this will still remain enforced even though the business Role PFCG is granting him to see...There is a difference between user specific authorizations and Business Role specific authorization...
In second case,its user linked Authorizations. When you add the PFCG role in SU01, this is being the User Specific Authorizations which will always have the priority and thus granting the display.
This is my basic understanding. I am 100% sure that PFCG role only controls the DISPLAY/CREATE/CHANGE related authorizations and lots more in context of authorizations. However what to include & show is decided by Navigation Profile and Business Role customizations.
If everything is intact in navigation bar profile and business role customizations, and still you dont see anything on the work center, then i am 100% sure that its related to User Authorizations
Refer pg 56 in CR580, it will clear your doubt.
Thanks & regards,
Suchita

Regarding problem while assigning logical system

Hi Friends,
I had a problem while assigning logical system to the client where in both of my systems are having same client number which belong to 2 different systems.
while assigning the sender and receiver logical system to the same client i am facing problem stating that an entry has already been made for the same key.
could any one plz give me a clear idea...while assigning logical systems (cross clients) for 2 different systems having same client number.
Regards,
Madhu

Hello Madhusree,
I'm running with same problem. I've created two logical systems and assigned them to two different clients. But here pops up the issue while generating partner profiles, throwing error "No active plan version exists". Later when I researched about the issue, I came to know that T77S0 table doesn't have any entries regarding plan versions. Basically, I created two clients by doing "client copy" from source client (800 & 100). And I could see plan version entries in the T77S0 of client 800. So, I thought of assigning just defined logical system to the source client 800 itself. But it throws error saying "entry already exists"; as client (800) is already assigned with other logical system.
By coming across your post, gives me leap of hope that two logical systems can be assigned to same client. Could you please share me those troubleshooting steps concerning this issue. Points will be awarded.
Regards, Anil.

Text Member Director bug?

Hi there,
Whilst trying to track down what I though was my own bug, I
discovered that
with Director 8.5's text member charPosToLoc() function I
seem to have found
a strange anomaly....
1. Create a text member. Set framing to Adjust To Fit and
wordWrap to on.
2. Starting with an empty member type text into it until the
first line, is
almost filled.
3. Type a row of empty space chars (not they do not force the
text member to
return to the second line).
4. Put the member.charPosToLoc(member.char.count).
5. You will observe that the resulting loc.locH is way beyond
the right hand
edge of the text member's width!
Can anyone replicate, or suggest a work around? It's a real
problem for one
aspect of my Chatroom project.
Thanks experts!
Richard Smith

"Chunick" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:evqp6l$nq4$[email protected]..
> I'm also working on a chat, but using mx2004... and it
still occurs in
> mx2004
> as well. Seems to be a bug that has carried over to the
newest version.
> Can I
> ask the context to which you're needing to set the text
member to adjust
> to fit
> with wordwrap?... it seems like you are trying to set up
chat bubbles or
> something.
Yes, you are quite right, very observant! :)
I had a bug with my smiley placement within the bubbles, but
that work
around fixed it. Ain't smiley placement a pain ? ;)
Cheers, and good luck with your chatroom!
Richard

Regarding Batch No Assignment During Process Order Release.

hi,
i have one secenario.
Suppose I have Process Order For material. PH-5000.
It have 3 material as ingradients.
ph-1000 - roh
ph-2000 - roh
ph-3000 - Semifinished.
what i want when Process order for Mateiral ph-5000 get released.
Batch No of PH-3000(Semifinsehd) get copied to PH-5000 batch no.
Its Urgent
Is any Enhancement is theri , pls let me know,
Thanks,
you can mail me.
[email protected]

Dear Mohit,
If you want to go for external batch numbering during order release then
- Set no automatic Batch creation in order in T.Code CORY.
This setting only restrict the automatic Batch Creation in order only.But to fulfill second your requirement of restricting order release or save without assigning external batch no you have to either go for,
- User exit.Below are the user exits which are trigger at the time of order saving
PPCO0006 to predefine entries for order header fields when
an order
PPCO0001 to provide information at the time of saving (for
production orders and process orders)
PPCO0007 to check or change header data when saving
or
- Create screen variant using T.code SHD0 and make Batch Field compulsory.
Regards,
Dhaval

"assign" bug in wlst 9

Hi all, we are using wlst offline to configure domain and its resources. While doing it, we came across interesting situation.
For one of our applications, we needed to configure JMS resources and mail session in a domain. This combination produced interesting situation. While assigning target(s) to mail session mbean using "assign", it would re-assign the target(s) of jms sub deploy module from jms server(s) to list of target for mail session. We were using "assign" for setting up target.
I spent considerable to time to figure it out and resolved it by using "setTarget" for mail session instead of "assign".
Is it a bug or lack of documentation on wlst? A little insight on this would really help us and others in future.
Thanks much,
hardeep
Edited by reehalhs at 07/24/2007 10:07 AM
Edited by reehalhs at 07/24/2007 10:08 AM

See this -> Don’t Panic
"Yesterday (09/09/09, by the way) Apple released iTunes 9. Unfortunately it has a nasty bug that prevents iVolume from analyzing songs that have been imported from a file. All other songs – that is purchased, ripped or converted songs – will still be processed fine by iVolume.
We put highest priority on this issue. All other projects have been interrupted in order to restore full compatibility with iTunes 9 as soon as possible. We already found a solution and are currently busy implementing it. Things look good so far.
So please be patient, a new version of iVolume will be released very soon"

Airport Self-assigned bug

Hello,
I have a MBP 2.4 running OSX 10.5.6, and I have for a least the last 6 months have the problem that it won't re-connect after restart/sleep/airport-on-off.
Well, that's not entirely correct, because it does find my network and tries to connect with the comment "Self-assigned IP". That fails. I then have to select the network myself, without further problems.
PS: I also had the keychain update 1.0 password bug, where it would ask for the password everytime. I got that fixed by booting up in safe mode (holding shift at boot time), and just re-starting.
I really hope I can fix this last problem.
Regards

Seems like I posted in the wrong forum (should have been in the old MBP forum). Sorry.

Screwed up trying to fix group assignment bug

I should have left well enough alone. Anyway, reading this list, I followed the instructions to reset the ACL permissions for my user folder in Leopard. I downloaded TinkerTools System and must have messed up, because I got COMPLETELY locked out of my user folder. Nothing worked, permissions said "Custom Permissions". I tried getting things reset with terminal chmod -R 0777 myFolder, with didn't do the trick. I changed my group to 20 in the Accounts panel, as suggested. Anyway, I'm back in Tiger, thank God I made a disc clone before installing Leopard a week ago.
Any suggestions on how I should approach this? In Leopard, I am group = 20, user = 501. Is there any permission system that doesn't involve user or group permissions? Is there some other security system I need to know about?
Thanks for any input.

Just a bit more on this.
The Terminal script to change the user folder to group 20 caused errors, so I just did chgrp -R 20 myUserFolder
That would have changed the group for every folder in my user directory. I also set all permissions to 0777, which should have made all files accessible to everyone.
So, is there a way to fix this, or should I just start over after Apple puts out a fix for the group assignment problem?

Regarding Org assignment record create/delete

Hi All,
I have created a postion and assigned a holder , as i have doen mistake in period creation i have deleated that position , and created a new postionand holder with correct period.
but in org assignment infoype 0001 these old and new record got saved.Is there any possibility to deleate thsi record.
Regards

Hi
Do remember that whenever an OBJECT ID start date is wrong, try to correct it with the program. RE_RHBEGDA0. This will correct the start date of the OBJECT IDs.
I think, the new record is in 0001 - Organisational Assignment.
1) Try to delete the first record, then go to delete the wrong entry record.
2) Try to change the first record with the date of the wrong entry date, so that it will get delimited.
Regards
Team Member.

Regarding a member assignment bug

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for