Regarding end user ?

dear guru's
i have 5 month experience in PM Module so where i work PM module is implemented but end user not working yet so i m new in this to handle all so tell in which way i can start my PM MOdule and also to track them a right place so plz do needfully
regards
Atul sharma
9909973893

dear sir
ok sir thanks for help
regards
Edited by: atul.sharma on Feb 13, 2012 5:17 PM

Similar Messages

Regarding end user role

Hi all:
Is there a standard role called end user role which can not be found in our system ? if yes, can you please tell me what actions should be assigned to the role?
thank you very much
Edited by: jingying Sony on May 11, 2010 4:01 AM

Hi,
You can assign Standard User (eu_role) or Every User Core (eu_core_role).
Check the documentation here.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/47/f0f7415e639c39e10000000a155106/content.htm
Regards,
Sandeep Tudumu

Regarding end user permission

Hi Gurus,
I have three iviews (v1,v2,v3)assigned to a role(RoleAll) which will be assigned to user. The requirement is: certain user can only see certain iviews.
my notion is:
another three roles(role1, role2, role3) created, and set the iviews' end user permission enabed to respective role(v1--->role1, v2>role2, v3--->role3), what I expected is : the user with role RoleAll and role1 will see v1.
user with role RoleAll, role1 and rol2 will see v1 and v2.
when I implement like this, the behavior is not as expected.
Can anyone body guide me?
Best regards,
John

>
John Wu wrote:
> I have three iviews (v1,v2,v3)assigned to a role(RoleAll) which will be assigned to user.
>The requirement is: certain user can only see certain iviews.
> my notion is:
> another three roles(role1, role2, role3) created, and set the iviews' end user permission
>enabed to respective role(v1--->role1, v2>role2, v3--->role3), what I expected is :
>the user with role RoleAll and role1 will see v1.
> user with role RoleAll, role1 and rol2 will see v1 and v2.
>
Hello,
Assign iView 1 to Role1, iView2 to Role2 & iView3 to Role3.
Assign RoleAll to those users who should see atleast one of these iViews.
Then Assign Role1 to the users who should see iView1. Similarly assign
Role2 and Role3 to respective users.
Now use Role Merging concept. Give same merge IDs to all the roles. For
the user having two of these roles (for e.g, RoleAll + Role1), will see
only one merged role...and one iView.
refer:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/53/89503ede925441e10000000a114084/content.htm
May be you could give it a shot.
Regards,
Anagha

SAP HR End User Manual

Dear All,
Myself Darshan Palkar from Pune completed MBA-HR from PUMBA.
This is my first posting to this forum
Currently i am pursuing SAP HR - End User training at Pune.
Can any one send me the end user manual for HR
If anybody is having openings for SAP HR End User then please let me know & any information regarding End User also welcome
Thanks in advance
Regards
Darshan Palkar

Dear Darshan
You would get user manual for SAP HR course with training institutes. They do not have any soft copy. You could also get notes from some small institutes conducted SAP HR courses.
Regards
Chintan J

Is there a way for an end user to see who has membership in a security group

Windows Server 2008 R2
Active Directory Domain
Windows 7 workstations
I am looking for a way that my end users can look at a folder security tab and then discover who has membership in the security groups listed.
Is that possible? Any drawbacks or concerns?

Hi Tod,
Based on my research, other than viewing group membership in ADUC, we can use this PowerShell cmdlet
Get-ADGroupMember GroupName and Net Group GroupName to view members in a group:
However, these commands can only be used on Domain Controllers or when connecting to DCs remotely. That’s because accounts and account membership are stored on Domain Controllers, therefore we can only view group membership on DCs.
More information for you:
Viewing the Direct Members of a Group
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd391915(v=WS.10).aspx
Net group
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754051.aspx
Best Regards,
Amy

How to configure SharePoint HNSC with a reverse proxy server so that HNSC Share Point URLs are not exposed to end users.

Could you please let me know how SharePoint HNSC can be configured with a reverse proxy server so that HNSC Share Point URLs are not exposed to end users.
In normal path based site collections/web applications, reverse proxy configuration can be done using alternate access mappings with Public URL = "proxy URL", internal = "HNSC Share Point URL" so that share point sends response back
to Public URL = "proxy URL".
In Host Named Site Collections, alternate access mappings are not supported. Each HNSC is designed to have only one URL in each zone. Zone is one of the five zones(Default,Intranet,Internet,Custom,Extranet) with each of which only one alternate
URL is associated. This is what we are able to get using power shell command "Set-SPSiteUrl", but this will not help us to get the response back to proxy URL after a request sent to share point because we could not find any mechanism in share
point HNSC to respond to a different URL(proxy URL). Consequently, Share Point URLs are exposed to external users.
Below share point article in MSDN blog is symmetrical to what we are observing with Share Point 2013 and Proxy Server. It mentions that internal HNSC URLs can’t be hidden using any proxy server. If hiding the internal Share Point URLS is a requirement,
it suggests to use a web application instead of host named site collections.
Though I’m also observing the same behavior with Share Point 2013 HNSC, Could you please confirm my understanding is correct.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaevans/archive/2012/03/27/what-every-sharepoint-admin-needs-to-know-about-host-named-site-collections.aspx
Excerpt from above article-
"Host Named Site Collections Only Use One Host Name
Continuing on the discussion on AAMs and host named site collections, you cannot use multiple host names to address a site collection in SharePoint 2010. Because host-named site collections have a single URL, they do not support alternate access mappings and
are always considered to be in the Default zone. This is important if you are using a reverse proxy to provide access to external users. Products like Unified Access Gateway 2010 allow external users to authenticate to your gateway and access a site
as http://uag.sharepoint.com and forward the call to http://portal.sharepoint.com. Remember that URL rewriting is not permitted. Further, a site collection can only respond to one host name. This means if you are using a reverse proxy, it must forward the
calls to the same URL. If your networking team has a policy against exposing internal URLs externally, you must instead use web applications and extend the web application using an alternate access mapping."<u5:p></u5:p>

Hi Satish,
You are right that only one URL is allowed for each zone of the host-name site collections in both SharePoint 2010 and SharePoint 2013.
It is by design that each host-name site collection only support one URL for each zone.
The article below is about RTM version of SharePoint, and it is the same for SharePoint 2013 with the latest CU.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2826457
So to make the URL of HNSC not exposed to external users is not supported, you need to use path-based sites instead.
Best regards.
Thanks
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

End User Transaction for Mass Change Sales Orders

Hello,
Transaction MASS can be used to change sales orders using object type BUS2032, however, end users are not allowed access to MASS.
In most other cases, the object types can be accessed by individual transactions, for example, MEMASSPO for BUS2012 and XD99 for KNA1.
But I cannot seem to find a similar transaction for object type BUS2032, does anyone know whether one exists or how to create such a shortcut.
Thanks,
Jake.

Hi
See SAP Note 483303 - BUS2032: Only sales orders of category VBAK-VBTYP = 'C'
Regards
Eduardo

How to Use the same iview for both KM End User and the KM Administrator

Hi friends,
*This is my scenario :* How to Use the same iview for both KM End User and the KM Administrator but with different Context
Menu Options.
i followed these steps but im getting same context menu for both KM End User and the KM Administrator .
Assign the role Content Administrator to the user km_admin. This is needed so that km_admin can change
the presentation settings for the KM Folder u201EReports_kmFolder‟.
Now, login with user km_admin. Navigate to the Km Folder reports_kmFolder through Content Administration
-> Km Content. Click on Details link of the folder reports_kmFolder.
Go To Settings -> Presentation. Click on the tab u201ESettings for You‟-> Click on button u201ESelect Profile‟.
Select the radio button corresponding to u201Elayout Set‟, and choose u201EConsumerExplorer‟ from the dropdown.
Click u201EOK‟.
Select both the check boxes corresponding to Items Affected as shown above, and click u201ESave‟
Now, remove the u201ESuper Administrator‟ role from the user km_admin and login with this user.
How rto resolve this????
Regards,
Prasad.

Hello Prasad,
Most likely the user km_admin still has system principal roles assigned, even though you removed the Super Admin role, you should check that this user doesn't have any other admin roles, otherwise it will be considered a System Principal user and will therefore still have access to all content. For more information see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/19/56f28fbd4e11d5993b00508b6b8b11/frameset.htm
Try creating a new user with just read access to the content and you should see that it will not be able to make any changes etc.
Regards,
Lorcan.

Looking for a better way to backup end users

Hello there.
Not sure if this the best forum for this post but here goes.
Last week my company had a break in and a couple of laptops got lifted. Not a big deal as I had backups of the machines on tape. It did take a while to recover the files though. During that time I got to thinking about a better way to backup and I am looking for any ideas of if this would work or not.
First quick overview. About 60 end users majority with laptops.
What I am thinking of doing is this. Take an xServe RAID configured in RAID 5, for redundancy and speed, and creating a shared folder on it for each of my end users. This way if they need to retrieve a file they can log in and will not have to call me. Then, this is where I need help, use some tool to copy all of their files at specified intervals into their folder, at least once a day. I am currently using Retrospect to backup everyone directly to tape and I could use that to do this but the only thing I do not like about Retrospect is it can only do one user at a time. With 60 users I have to start it pretty early in the day. I know copy files would be alot faster so I am not ruling it out. I was also thinking about using ChronoSync to accomplish this and then use Retrospect to backup the RAID to tape for long term storage. I am ruling out using Home directories on the xServe for my users because they are all laptops and are usually out of the office at least one day a week.
If anyone could offer some ideas of whether or not this is going to work or not or if you have other suggestions, any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Daniel Krajc

Hi,
you could be using a combination of Mobile Accounts (for the settings of the ibook) and rsync (which is installed by default on 10.3 and 10.4), check man rsync for more info.
regards.
Dimi.

Help! ADF default behavior rejected by end users...

Hi,
We have built an ADF 11g application during the past months. Last week we had our first user acceptance test with a small group of users. The users were very satisfied about the nice looks of the screens. But they had quite a lot of issues with the default behavior of ADF. I'll provide a list of the most important issues below. I hope more people here at OTN have experienced these issues and perhaps have some workarounds. And perhaps Oracle can use lists like this to improve the next version of ADF...
<ol><li>Multi record edit We have a lot of multi record edit screens. These are all editable tables. Those tables have the following problems:
<ol type="a"><li>Whenever a partial refresh occurs, the whole table gets reloaded. This takes some time, which is uncomfortable. But the main problem here is that the table does not preserve the scroll bar position. The situation can be improved a little bit by setting the <tt>displayRow</tt> attribute to <tt>"selected"</tt> on the table. This will cause the table to show the selected record at the top of the view port after a refresh. But this still confuses the end users. In their experience the records are randomly jumping around.</li>
<li>Records are not always inserted at the bottom. (In fact, they are inserted above the selected record.) End users simply expect records to be inserted at the bottom of the table, no matter what. And I can't disagree with them. Isn't there a setting to achieve this in ADF?</li>
<li>Whenever the user navigates to another record in the editable table, all validation rules on the record he navigates from are fired. That means he cannot leave a required field empty to fill it later. The end users say this is very annoying. We would like to delay all validation until the user presses the Commit button. But as far as I know this is not possible, is it?</li>
<li>The selected record position is not preserved on a full refresh. Our Commit button forces a full refresh of the page. This sounds like a sensible choice to me. However, users tend to click on Commit quite often. But after a full refresh of the page, the currently selected record in a record set is always reset to the first record in the set. In a large data table, this annoys the users very much. Isn't it possible to preserve the selected record over a full refresh?</ol>
<li>Annoying validation errors Many end users are annoyed by the somewhat "persistent" validation error messages. In a larger form or an editable table, users sometimes want to ignore an error and first enter other data, before correcting the error. This is hardly possible, because ADF sets the input focus to fields with errors and keeps popping up windows with a list of fields that have errors. We would like to make the validation less "aggressive". It is okay to give a field a red border if it contains an error. But leave the input focus where it is. And don't show any popup until the user presses the Commit button. And even then show the popup window only once.</li>
<li>ADF BC caching and business rules in the database We have some business rules in our database that automatically fill some fields with default values. We have e.g. a master-details relation, where a value in the master record is calculated based on the values of the detail records. We have set the calculated field in the master record to "refresh after update" and "refresh after insert". Sometimes the value of the field gets refreshed, but sometimes not. Users know that the field should be calculated by "the system", and are asking if they did something wrong if it doesn't. I know we could do the calculation in ADF, but our policy is to have all business rules in the database and to not repeat ourselves (DRY). Is there another way to guarantee that the calculated value in the master record gets updated after an update or insert of one or more detail records?</li>
<li>Partial refresh loses data If a field causes a partial submit to occur, fields in the same record that were not (partial) submitted before lose their data. This forces us to enable partial submit on all fields. But that causes a delay after moving the focus to the next field and validations to be fired too early.</li>
</ol>
I've numbered the items above, please use these number as a reference if you're posting an answer to a specific question.
Please let me know any solution, even if it is only a partial solution. We've a nasty situation now. Our application is (nearly) finished, but it is blocked for production by the users because of the behavior of the ADF framework, on which we have very little influence. We can't blame the users for that, most of their criticism is fully justified. So we have to come up with a good solution for these issues before we can go to production. So any help would be highly appreciated!
Best regards,
Bart Kummel
PS.
We're using JDeveloper/ADF 11.1.1.1.0, we deploy to a WebLogic 10.3.1 server and we have an Oracle 10g database. We're using the full ADF stack: ADF Business Components, ADF Bindings and ADF Faces.

Hi Bart,
I can answer for few of your questions.
Bart Kummel wrote:
Hi,
We have built an ADF 11g application during the past months. Last week we had our first user acceptance test with a small group of users. The users were very satisfied about the nice looks of the screens. But they had quite a lot of issues with the default behavior of ADF. I'll provide a list of the most important issues below. I hope more people here at OTN have experienced these issues and perhaps have some workarounds. And perhaps Oracle can use lists like this to improve the next version of ADF...
<ol><li>Multi record edit We have a lot of multi record edit screens. These are all editable tables. Those tables have the following problems:
<ol type="a"><li>Whenever a partial refresh occurs, the whole table gets reloaded. This takes some time, which is uncomfortable. But the main problem here is that the table does not preserve the scroll bar position. The situation can be improved a little bit by setting the <tt>displayRow</tt> attribute to <tt>"selected"</tt> on the table. This will cause the table to show the selected record at the top of the view port after a refresh. But this still confuses the end users. In their experience the records are randomly jumping around.</li>You can set the fetchSize in the iterator to a minimum value (Say if you are displaying 20 records in the table at a time, you can set the fetchSize to 20, so that, it will fetch only 20 records at a time, and the remaining records on demand basis, i.e they will be fetched when you scroll in the table).
<li>Records are not always inserted at the bottom. (In fact, they are inserted above the selected record.) End users simply expect records to be inserted at the bottom of the table, no matter what. And I can't disagree with them. Isn't there a setting to achieve this in ADF?</li>I suppose you are using the default createInsert operation. You can write your own method instead of the default createInsert, which would have something like
public void customCreateInsert(){
vo.last();
vo.createInsert();
}You can expose this method as method action and use it in place of default CreateInsert.
<li>Whenever the user navigates to another record in the editable table, all validation rules on the record he navigates from are fired. That means he cannot leave a required field empty to fill it later. The end users say this is very annoying. We would like to delay all validation until the user presses the Commit button. But as far as I know this is not possible, is it?</li>You can set the immediate property to true for the column for which you want to skip the validation. However, the validation will fire when you submit / commit the changes (which is expected).
<li>The selected record position is not preserved on a full refresh. Our Commit button forces a full refresh of the page. This sounds like a sensible choice to me. However, users tend to click on Commit quite often. But after a full refresh of the page, the currently selected record in a record set is always reset to the first record in the set. In a large data table, this annoys the users very much. Isn't it possible to preserve the selected record over a full refresh?</ol>Again, you can have a custom method, which would get the current row, commit the transaction and do a setCurrentRowWithKey to point to the last selected record after commit.
<li>Annoying validation errors Many end users are annoyed by the somewhat "persistent" validation error messages. In a larger form or an editable table, users sometimes want to ignore an error and first enter other data, before correcting the error. This is hardly possible, because ADF sets the input focus to fields with errors and keeps popping up windows with a list of fields that have errors. We would like to make the validation less "aggressive". It is okay to give a field a red border if it contains an error. But leave the input focus where it is. And don't show any popup until the user presses the Commit button. And even then show the popup window only once.</li>You can add a af:messages tag in the top and set globalOnly to true. Also, set the immediate property for the items to skip the validation when they tab out.
<li>ADF BC caching and business rules in the database We have some business rules in our database that automatically fill some fields with default values. We have e.g. a master-details relation, where a value in the master record is calculated based on the values of the detail records. We have set the calculated field in the master record to "refresh after update" and "refresh after insert". Sometimes the value of the field gets refreshed, but sometimes not. Users know that the field should be calculated by "the system", and are asking if they did something wrong if it doesn't. I know we could do the calculation in ADF, but our policy is to have all business rules in the database and to not repeat ourselves (DRY). Is there another way to guarantee that the calculated value in the master record gets updated after an update or insert of one or more detail records?</li>We need some more information. Do you see any "pattern" on which this things occur?
-Arun

SP2013 WF works for admin but not end-users

A simple SP2013 WF calls a SP2010 WF to send email, simple. Works for me (admin) but when a SP user edits an item on the list (which fires the WF), the WF gets to the 2010 call, and fails with this error...
RequestorId: f8c56627-e4e5-5a26-0000-000000000000. Details: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the workflow instance. Exception details: System.ApplicationException: HTTP 401 {"Transfer-Encoding":["chunked"],"X-SharePointHealthScore":["0"],"X-SP-SERVERSTATE":["ReadOnly=0"],"SPClientServiceRequestDuration":["61"],"SPRequestGuid":["f8c56627-e4e5-5a26-97ee-ad70ca4d3291"],"request-id":["f8c56627-e4e5-5a26-97ee-ad70ca4d3291"],"X-FRAME-OPTIONS":["SAMEORIGIN"],"MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices":["16.0.0.2930"],"X-Content-Type-Options":["nosniff"],"X-MS-InvokeApp":["1;
RequireReadOnly"],"Cache-Control":["max-age=0, private"],"Date":["Wed, 25 Jun 2014 02:44:54 GMT"],"P3P":["CP=\"ALL IND DSP COR ADM CONo CUR CUSo IVAo IVDo PSA PSD TAI TELo OUR SAMo CNT COM INT
NAV ONL PHY PRE PUR UNI\""],"Server":["Microsoft-IIS\/7.5"],"WWW-Authenticate":["NTLM"],"X-AspNet-Version":["4.0.30319"],"X-Powered-By":["ASP.NET"]} at System.Activities.Statements.Throw.Execute(CodeActivityContext
context) at System.Activities.CodeActivity.InternalExecute(ActivityInstance instance, ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager) at System.Activities.Runtime.ActivityExecutor.ExecuteActivityWorkItem.ExecuteBody(ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager
bookmarkManager, Location resultLocation) Exception from activity Throw If Sequence Sequence TryCatch Sequence Microsoft.SharePoint.WorkflowServices.Activities.RetryForDurationPolicy HTTPPost_WorkflowInterop_EnableEvents WorkflowInterop DynamicActivity<Guid>
Then If Working Sequence Flowchart Sequence RCSEmailCst.WorkflowXaml_4f7b53dc_968d_4e22_a812_3178e7b01bad
Spent an hour on phone with M$ support, only to be told it's my fault and I have to re-design my WF...if my WF gets any simpler I'll have to use carrier pigeons to get messages to customers!
I've Googled the error message, results suggest that User Profile Syn is out of whack but M$ support swears up & down our sync is working fine.
Anyone?
Edit to add: we have a hosted implementation of SP2013, NOT on-prem

Hi ,
According to your description, my understanding is that the SharePoint workflow 2013 does not work for end-users in your environment.
For your issue, it can be a permission for the user initiating the workflow. Please make sure site feature Workflows can use app permissions is activated. Go to Site actions > Site Settings >
Site features > Workflows can use app permissions. Make sure the user is one member of a SharePoint Group.
Also please provide more detail information about the error message to determine the exact cause of the error. You can have a look at the blog:
http://ranaictiu-technicalblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/sharepoint-2013-workflow-debugdiagnosis.html
Best Regards,
Eric
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

End User Role for Service Desk in Solution Manager

Hey,
I am launching the Service Desk functionality for my End Users. One thing that i want to know of is the role that I should assign my user in Solution Manager to access his message. E.g.
I have a user 'A' who creates a message from any system in my landscape:Test, QA, Dev or Production. Now this message reaches in Solution Manager and is assigned to a certain Support Team according to the rules I defined. Now the personnel of Support Team needs some feedback from the end user who created the message. For that the user 'A' has to log into Solution Manager, access his message and enter the details which the Support Team requested.
I want to know that what Role should i give to this user 'A' so that he is able to access ONLY the messages that he created i.e. "Reported by" field showing user 'A'; and is able to view and edit them.
If I give him the role SAP_SUPPDESK_CREATE and SAP_SUPPDESK_DISPLAY, he is just able to see the messages, all of them, but is not authorized to edit any. Please help me out in this matter as i need a solution asap.
Regards,
Bilal Nazir

Hi Nazir,
Create a role and add this t-code manually.
CRM_DNO_MONITOR - Transaction Monitor
This is will definitely solve your problem.
Feel free to revert back.
Thanks and Regards,
Ragu
ERP,
Suzlon Energy Limted, Pune
Extn: 2638
+919370675797
I have no limits for others sky is only a reason

Is there a way to prevent an end-user from changing their own password?

All you guru's out there, I need your help. Is there a way to prevent an end-user from changing their own password? Is there a function or procedure I can create or what?

In this case, you do not want someone (whoever they are DBA etc) to connect as that
particuler user to change the password.Yes, but I wouldn't expect the users to[i] know that password. The connnect would be handled automatically, behind the scenes.
The clear implication of the OP's question and response was that users would not be allowed to change their own passwords. I'm guessing this is in response to a policy that says users mustn't have simple passwords like 123abc or mom. In such a scenario a better approach would be to apply regexp to a user's password to ensure it contains a mix of letters, numbers, punctuation, etc to achieve the desired level of complexity.
So questions, should not be regarded as daft Agreed, but the same is unfortunately not always true of business decisions. As the OP has told us not to ask we cannot know why they want to do this. Personally, I think a user's individual password should always be their responsibility; anything else strikes me as insecure. YMMV.
Cheers, APC

Activating a Windows 7 installation (for an end user) as a MS Registered Refurbisher.

I have applied to join the MRR program and have passed the test and am awaiting approval.
I was reading in the MRR manual that MS prefers that a refurbished PC is set up with sysprep so that the end user has to accept the license agreements and activate before using Windows.
However, the manual went on to say that the Refurbisher can choose to activate windows as a courtesy for his customers as long as he configures the PC to display the license agreements when the end user uses the PC for the first time.
This is probably a stupid question, but how is this achieved? Can Sysprep be somehow set to retain the activation information?
Or is this achieved using one of the tools on the OEM Preinstallation Disk or with the RPK tools described in the MRR manual?
Thank you for your patience with me :)

Hi,
Regarding to sysprep, the activation information will be removed or I mean it doesn't work (even the reference PC is activated) when you deploy the image to other computers.
This is the exact sentence from TechNet website
You cannot make an image of an activated Windows installation and duplicate that image to another computer. If you do, Windows fails to recognize the activation and forces the end user to reactivate the installation manually.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766514(v=ws.10).aspx
Add:
For a Refurbished PC, the PC has two labels; either the original Certificate of Authenticity (COA) label the PC manufacturer installed or the Genuine Microsoft Label AND a COA from the PC refurbisher. for manually activation, the end user can only use
COA from the PC refurbisher.
Yolanda Zhu
TechNet Community Support

When creating a fillable form fields from an existing pdf file, how do you set or allow end user to set the font size in the fields?

I successfully created a form filled pdf using an existing pdf document. However, the font size is too large to allow end user to type in information in the form box. Is there a way to 1)globally set all of the form fields when generated to a much smaller font size &/or 2) allow end user to change the font size if needed to put all information in one box without font being so large?

Hi DenisonDoc,
There is no option right now to set properties globally primarily for Text fields. You may make sure fields doesn't contain anything.
Select all the text filed from the form and right click any of the selected field make sure all of them are selected choose properties --> Appearance there you can choose Font Size and Font type.
- End users cant change size and type of font. It is up to designer.
Regards,
Ajlan Huda.

Regarding end user ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for