Regarding Instance Filter for instance search

Hi,
We are facing one problem during instance search through InstanceFilter code. We have written the following code to find the instance-
Fuego.Papi.InstanceFilter instFilter;
instFilter.create(processService : ProcessService);
instFilter.addAttributeTo(variable : "String", comparator : Comparison.IS,value : String);
instancesValues = ProcessService.getInstancesByFilter(filter : instFilter);
We are able to find the instances through this code if the instances are at any Interactive activity but unable to find the instances if they are lying in MessageWait activity. The instanceValues length in this case always comes as "0" but if the instances are at any Interactive activity, we are getting the instanceValues length as required.
Please suggest some way to find the instances which are at MessageWait activity.
Thanks in advance,
Abhishek

Hi,
Define the SearchScope for the filter right after you create it - as below:
Fuego.Papi.InstanceFilter instFilter;
instFilter.create(processService : ProcessService);
instFilter.searchScope = SearchScope(participantScope : ParticipantScope.ALL, statusScope : StatusScope.ONLY_INPROCESS);
instFilter.addAttributeTo(variable : "String", comparator : Comparison.IS,value : String);
instancesValues = ProcessService.getInstancesByFilter(filter : instFilter);
Having ParticipantScope as "ALL", enables the filter to return all the instances irrespective of the activity type (interactive or automatic)...
-Thanks,
Malar.

Similar Messages

Instance Search Using Ajax

Hi,
I am using Apex 3.2 I recent saw ajax instance search using ajax done by karthic patel which is very nice URL link : http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=9904351712:8:0::NO:RP::
I did the same in apex 4 it's working fine for me now. My requirement is how to incorporate this apex 3.2 Please suggestion how to change the dynamic action which is there is apex4 not in apex3
Please Suggest
Thanks
Sudhir

Its a rather involved subject. So better do some reading on your own and try out something simpler before you jump into the deep end with IR.
Here are the original posts from one of the authors of JS API of APEX. (He still lives in Apex $x, $s ,etc.)
http://carlback.blogspot.in/2008/03/new-stuff-1.html
http://carlback.blogspot.in/2008/03/new-stuff-2-x01-and-friends.html
http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=33&ved=0CFUQFjACOB4&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwphilltech.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2FSt.Hilaire-AJAX-in-APEX-ODTUG-June-2011.pptx&ei=mrSrT8z3Eaqg2gXOg5mmAg&usg=AFQjCNGMnzT_nvDaz6E3P7L7PS6P-NNxJA
Regards,

Authorization filter for search resulut list according to UI Guidlines

Hi,
can anybody give me a hint where I can find the filters for diplaying results in a search result list. I found following information in chapter 17 of the UI Guidlines for SAP CRM:
Search result lists
One option for entries in a search result list is to show only objects for which the user executing the search has at least display authorizations (in other words, the result list is filterred based on maintained authorizations).
The other option is to also show objects for which the user doeas not at least have display authorization (in other words, the result list is not filtered based on maintained authorizations).
But I don't know where ic can set these filters.
Best Regards
Michael

You should use BAdI CRM_BADI_RF_Q1O_SEARCH for BTX and BADI_CRM_BUPA_IL_SEARCH_EXT for BUPA search. There is one little problem with BUPA - BAdI is called not always, solution of this is here: Filtering account search
Best regards,
Artur Litvinov.

"Using the Filter HUD to Search for Referenced Files" (and "Locate Referenced Files")

I am trying to follow the Help Documentation item "Using the Filter HUD to Search for Referenced Master" (not sure if there is a way to post a URL to this) and I am not seeing what it is telling me to do.
I am going to Edit > Find and it is telling me to "Click the Filter HUD button beside the search field in the Browser". Is this referring to a browser in the Aperture UI or is this in the Filter HUD display? I am not finding this.
Also, it saying that in the Filter HUD I should "choose File Status from the Add Filter pop-up menu, and select the 'File Status' checkbox." and I am not seeing this either. Does anyone know where this is at?
Lastly, I see that there is a command called File > Locate Referenced Files and when I run this I get a "No Referenced Files in the /current/ selection. I have realized that I don't quite understand whether I am running this search for a specific Project and/or whether I have to make a specific selection in the left hand pane when I run a FILTER HUD or whether this automatically defaults to search the whole database. Does it matter what I have selected in the current Browser View when I run either of these commands?
Thanks for any help in my getting this working better for me.

hotwheels 22 wrote:
I am trying to follow the Help Documentation item "Using the Filter HUD to Search for Referenced Master" (not sure if there is a way to post a URL to this) and I am not seeing what it is telling me to do. 1
I am going to Edit > Find and it is telling me to "Click the Filter HUD button beside the search field in the Browser". Is this referring to a browser in the Aperture UI or is this in the Filter HUD display? I am not finding this. 2
Also, it saying that in the Filter HUD I should "choose File Status from the Add Filter pop-up menu, and select the 'File Status' checkbox." and I am not seeing this either. Does anyone know where this is at? 3
Lastly, I see that there is a command called File > Locate Referenced Files and when I run this I get a "No Referenced Files in the /current/ selection. I have realized that I don't quite understand whether I am running this search for a specific Project and/or whether I have to make a specific selection {4} in the left hand pane {5} when I run a FILTER HUD or whether this automatically defaults to search the whole database. Does it matter what I have selected in the current Browser View when I run {6} either of these commands? 7
Thanks for any help in my getting this working better for me.
1. Just copy and paste the URL from the on-line User Manual. Very helpful. Are you on this page?
2. From the above-linked page:
Show the Filter HUD by doing one of the following:
Choose Edit > Find (or press Command-F).
Click the Filter HUD button beside the search field in the Browser.
The instructions specify ONE of the following. Your question indicates to me that you are trying to do both.
3. The User Manual has used the wrong term here. It should say "Choose 'File Status' from the 'Add RULE' pop-up menu."
4. The command -- like all commands? -- works on the currently selected Images. On the same page in the User Manual it says:
You can select a group of images in the Browser and Aperture can show a list of the referenced images within the selection, including information about where the masters are located. {Emphasis mine.}
5. The Aperture workspace is highly configurable. I don't know what you mean by "the left-hand pane". Of what?
6. Yes. Of course it matters. At some point in the 80's when the GUI became standard computers standardized on the "Noun→Verb" syntax: Select object(s), select command(s).
7. Not sure what the second command to which your refer is.

How do you save a custom search filter for projects/ library?

Is there a way to save a customized default for the way I will use search filter options?
I've looked everywhere... It seems the seach filter for every project just wants to behave on it's own accord.
Most of the time, I just want to search different projects the same way with one, filtered result!

The Filter settings are sticky. Every container listed on the Library tab of the Inspector keeps it's own Filter settings, set to whatever was last used.
I'm not aware of any way to set a default Filter.
You could create a Folder and put a Smart Album in that Folder with "Source" set to the Folder. Any Albums or Projects you put in the Folder become the superset for the Filter you set in the Smart Album. This is a pretty sophisticated set-up, however. What is the filter you need, and how often do you need it?

Is there a FIND search filter for SHARED folders?

I believe Archiving will only archive the users emails not any messages displayed in a shared folder.
But when I do a FIND search by date, I still see all those messages from shared folders that other users own.
Is there a FIND search filter for SHARED folders?
Further is there a way to differentiate or filter in a FIND search for shared folders that only I own, or shared folders that are owned by other people?

condor wrote:
> The Archiving process knows not to move messages from folders that are owned
> by other people. How does it know?
The archiving process isn't "allowed" to move messages from folders that are
owned by others. This is a different matter altogether. Archiving systems
typically use either IMAP or SOAP for their access, and cannot access folders
shared by other users (Nexic Discovery is different in this if you use the API
version of it, because it can see shared folders, and will archive if you
request it).
You are comparing apples and oranges unfortunately, and the client was built to
be able to manage shared folders unlike the archiving program.
As Michael says, you can choose to not "look in" shared folders if you do not
want them to show up in a find results.
Danita
Novell Knowledge Partner
Moving GroupWise to Linux?
http://www.caledonia.net/gwmove.html

Complex request with range filter and boolean search

Hi
I need a build and maintain complex requests to Oracle Endeca Server. These requests could include different types of attributes: string, datetime, int.
For string attributes I have created a search interface and use boolean search. For datetime attributes I use a range filter. Separately it works as I expected, but it fails with combined search with range filter and boolean search in a single request. As I see from results range filter is completely ignored. What could be wrong with following request?
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<S:Envelope xmlns:S="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<S:Body>
<ns3:Request xmlns:ns2="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/lql_parser/types" xmlns:ns3="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/conversation/1/0">
<ns3:State/>
<ns3:Operator xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:RecordFilterOperator">
<ns3:RecordFilter Name="OnlyData">AND(NOT(mdex-property_Key),NOT(mdex-dimension_Key),NOT(mdex-config_Key),NOT(mdex-precedenceRule_Key),NOT(system-group_Key),NOT(system-group-membership_Key))</ns3:RecordFilter>
</ns3:Operator>
<ns3:Operator xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:SortOperator" Direction="Descending" Key="string_prop" OwnerId="Records"/>
<ns3:Operator xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:RangeFilterOperator">
<ns3:RangeFilter AttributeName="dateTime_prop">
<ns3:LowerBound Inclusive="true">2012-07-24T19:47:01Z</ns3:LowerBound>
</ns3:RangeFilter>
</ns3:Operator>
<ns3:Operator xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:SearchOperator">
<ns3:SearchFilter SnippetLength="20" EnableSnippeting="true" Mode="Boolean" Key="orderSearch">multiple_prop : one</ns3:SearchFilter>
</ns3:Operator>
<ns3:ContentElementConfig xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:RecordListConfig" HandlerFunction="RecordListHandler" HandlerNamespace="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/conversation/1/0" Id="Records">
<ns3:RecordsPerPage>3</ns3:RecordsPerPage>
</ns3:ContentElementConfig>
</ns3:Request>
</S:Body>
</S:Envelope>
If my approach is incorrect could you provide me a a better way to handle such requests?
Regards,
Eugene.

Hi Eugene,
As you know, this issue has been discussed further, so I am posting here the summary of the findings, with the hope that this summary will benefit the Endeca Server user community at large.
* Boolean search only works with range filters for the AND operator. The documentation link above confirms this.
*Because of this restriction, you need to build another query that would achieve the same result. Both options are equally good and would achieve the results you need. Two suggestions that we've received were:
- Option 1. You could perform the key restriction of the search via a restrictive search interface rather than using the boolean match mode. This would involve creating a search interface for each field and then querying against the search interface for the field in question:
<Operator xmlns="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/lql_parser/types" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="SearchOperator">
<SearchFilter SnippetLength="20" EnableSnippeting="true" Mode="All" Key="orderSearch_for_field_multiple_prop">one</SearchFilter>
</Operator>
For this option, you would have to create a search interface for each attribute, using the Config Web Service. Here is the topic about loading config documents into the Endeca Server:http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E29805_01/server.230/es_dev/toc.htm#Loading%20configuration%20documents
- Option 2
* You could implement the range filter through EQL row expression syntax instead and pass it in via the DataSourceFilterOperator, which acts as a prefilter on all other query logic, using the Conversation Web Service. Thus you might include:
<Operator xmlns="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/lql_parser/types" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="DataSourceFilterOperator">
<DataSourceFilterString>dateTime_prop <= TO_DATETIME('2012-07-24T19:47:01Z')</DataSourceFilterString>
</Operator>
For this option, using the DataSourceFilter does not require you to model the rest of the query in EQL. It will perform slightly better than the filter in option 1 because of the order in which record set intersections are computed, but the difference is likely to be very small.
Finally, if this addresses your question, please mark this question as answered, so that others can benefit from it on the forum. Big thanks to Endeca Server development team (you know who you are!), for helping to find solutions for this request.
Julia
Edited by: JuliaM on Aug 30, 2012 2:05 PM
Edited by: JuliaM on Aug 30, 2012 2:06 PM

Filter for the current month

Hi all,
Our client wants to see the report for the current month whenever he opens the report. We have a field called date which shows the date when PO was created in the format of mm/yyyy and mmm yy(JAN 2004 or JAN 2007. How should I create a filter report or Drill not Query to filter the data for the current month only.
Regards,
BOB

Bob,
filter the data for the current month only.
It will work best setting up a filter at the Universe level. You don't mention the database vendor, but for instance if it was SQL Server you could use something like this:
select convert(char(11),getdate(),101)
Essentially you'll take the current date and modify it to conform to the MMM/YYYY format....
thanks,
John

BAdI for Account Search

Hi All,
I need a BADI in CRM 5.0 version for Account Search using EEWB fields.
I found a BADi CRM_ACC_SEARCH and have created a implementation, but the badis is not getting triggered during the search...
Let me know is there any other way to trigger the BADI or is there any means for using EEWB fields in Acc search.
Thanx,
Sivasankar

Hi Sivasankar,
There is a generic approach to identify all -classic- BAdIs called during program execution. You may use that approach to search for appropriate BAdI around Account Search:
trx SE24
CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE method
call method cl_exithandler=>get_class_name_by_interface
    exporting
      instance                      = instance
    importing
      class_name                    = class_name
    changing
      exit_name                     = exit_name
    exceptions
      no_reference                  = 1
      no_interface_reference        = 2
      no_exit_interface             = 3
      data_incons_in_exit_managem   = 4
      class_not_implement_interface = 5
      others                        = 6.
case sy-subrc.
    when 1.                                "<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< your external break-point here: then check EXIT_NAME variable
      raise no_reference.
Setting a break-point in this method will have program stop each time system checks if an BAdI implementation exists.
Hope this will help you
Best regards
Walter

Performing filter for field Tax Code (MWSKZ) in the Purchase Order

Hello Experts,
We have to perform a filter for field Tax Code in the purchase order (ME21N / ME22N / ME23N). We've tried to use SH SH_T007A and SSH_T007A with search help exit (e.g. F4_TAXCODE_USER_EXIT) but it is not working. The ABAP programmer has performed a debug and the standard does not check any line code in this function (the ABAP programmer has set a breakpoint into function F4_TAXCODE_USER_EXIT after assigning it for mentioned search helps)... it sounds like this program / search help is not called by standard program of ME2* transactions...
I've tried to look for some other object and other function called FI_F4_MWSKZ has been found... I've set a breakpoint there and when I open the search help for field tax code into transaction ME21N it works... but as I could see this function FI_F4_MWSKZ is a standard one which we can not change...
Have you ever had the same problem?
We are currently in the SAP 4.6C version. I've found lots of OSS notes but only valid for 6.0.
Maybe someone can help me on that.
Best regards,
Nilmar

hi,
goto gs01 transaction,give some name to ur step.
give the table name and field name.
then u can create a specific value set for that field.
save.
now u can use this set to define conditions for ur fields in obbh transaction.

Need Help regarding initial configuration for distributed cache

Hi ,
I am new to tangosol and trying to setup a basic partitioned distributed cache ,But I am not being able to do so
Here is my Scenario,
My Application DataServer create the instance of Tangosolcache .
I have this config.xml set in my machine where my application start.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE cache-config SYSTEM "cache-config.dtd">
<cache-config>
<caching-scheme-mapping>

<cache-mapping>
<cache-name>*</cache-name>
<scheme-name>default-distributed</scheme-name>
</cache-mapping>
</caching-scheme-mapping>
<caching-schemes>

<distributed-scheme>
<scheme-name>default-distributed</scheme-name>
<service-name>DistributedCache</service-name>
<backing-map-scheme>
<class-scheme>
<scheme-ref>default-backing-map</scheme-ref>
</class-scheme>
</backing-map-scheme>
<autostart>true</autostart>
</distributed-scheme>

<class-scheme>
<scheme-name>default-backing-map</scheme-name>
<class-name>com.tangosol.util.SafeHashMap</class-name>
<init-params></init-params>
</class-scheme>
</caching-schemes>
</cache-config>
Now on the same machine I start a different client using the command
java -Dtangosol.coherence.distributed.localstorage=false -Dtangosol.coherence.cacheconfig=near-cache-config.xml -classpath
"C:/calypso/software/release/build" -jar ../lib/coherence.jar
The problem I am facing is
1)If I do not start the client even then my application server cache the data .Ideally my config.xml setting is set to
distributed so under no case it should cache the data in its local ...
2)I want to bind my differet cache on different process on different machine .
say
for e.g
machine1 should cache cache1 object
machine2 should cache cache2 object
and so on .......but i could not find any documentation which explain how to do this setting .Can some one give me example of
how to do it ....
3)I want to know the details of cache stored in any particular node how do I know say for e.g machine1 contains so and so
cache and it corresponding object values ... etc .....
Regards
Mahesh

Hi Thanks for answer.
After digging into the wiki lot i found out something related to KeyAssociation I think what I need is something like implementation of KeyAssociation and that
store the particular cache type object on particular node or group of node
Say for e,g I want to have this kind of setup
Cache1-->node1,node2 as I forecast this would take lot of memory (So i assign this jvms like 10 G)
Cache2-->node3 to assign small memory (like 2G)
and so on ...
From the wiki documentation i see
Key Association
By default the specific set of entries assigned to each partition is transparent to the application. In some cases it may be advantageous to keep certain related entries within the same cluster node. A key-associator may be used to indicate related entries, the partitioned cache service will ensure that associated entries reside on the same partition, and thus on the same cluster node. Alternatively, key association may be specified from within the application code by using keys which implement the com.tangosol.net.cache.KeyAssociation interface.
Do someone have any example of explaining how this is done in the simplest way ..

How do you filter an email search (ie: Subject or From) in iOS 7?

How do you filter an email search (ie: Subject or From) in iOS 7?

Hello dh1316
The way iOS 7 searches email has changed. I have made an excerpt of the new way search works.
iPhone User Guide
http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1565/en_US/iphone_user_guide.pdf
Search for a message. Scroll to or tap the top of the messages list to reveal the search field. You can search the current mailbox, or all mailboxes at once. Searching looks at the address fields, the subject, and the message body.
Search by timeframe. Scroll to or tap the top of the messages list to reveal the search field, then type something like “February meeting” to find all messages from February with word “meeting.”
Search by message state. To find all flagged, unread messages from people in your VIP list, type “flag unread vip.” You can also search for other message attributes, such as “attachment.”
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Regards,
-Norm G.

Webserver Filter for Apache for SSO2

Hello,
i see in this Presentation that there is a Webserver filter for Apache aviable. With the Webserver I can check SSO2 Cookies:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sapportals.km.docs/documents/a1-8-4/sap active directory integration of sso and user management.pdf (Page23).
I search evrywhere, but i only found a Library and a Webserverfilter for IIS. Does anybody know where i can find this webfilter?
Best Regards,
Patrick
Message was edited by: Patrick Höfer

Hello,
you can find some informations about webfilter-file-location in SAP-note:
442401 (EP 5.0: Web-Serverfilter für SSO an Fremdsystemen )
- 723896 (EP 6.0: Webserverfilter für SSO bei Fremdanbietersystemen)
- 684106 (Microsoft Laufzeit DLLs)
and help.sap.com:
http://help.sap.com/sapdocu/netweaver/portals/ep50sp4/helpdata/EN/1c/22afe0b26011d5993800508b6b8b11/content.htm
good luck!
Nicky
Message was edited by: Nicky Gromeleit
Message was edited by: Nicky Gromeleit

Is creating an entity object expensive for wrapping search values..

I am trying to create a very robust generic method that searches for entities that match the fields according to a enum of search types.
The easiest way I find is to wrap all the values into an instance of the entity class so that testing can be done on field values expected to be present.
So the question is if creating an entity object for the sole purpose of wrapping search values is considered expensive?

yawmark wrote:
User has the ability to search for a number by simply providing a number and then choosing to find all numbers that match, or especifically just a home, work or cell number that match.That requirement doesn't make any sense to me. Can you please elaborate on that use case? I understand phone number reverse look-ups, but those are typically looking for a person or business. One typically wouldn't search for a number by providing a matching number.
~But one could...
I think a point is being missed here and therefore I need to discuss a new design pattern I am using...
1) I create a entity class as per usual but I break a o-o rule with encapsulation. All of my fields are protected and not private. This allows me to create a subclass of the entity and inherit the members so that they can be used for the function of this class. The sole purpose of this subclass is to put an o-o framework around a String[] of search criteria provided according to the type of search to be done.
2) The method in my interface for finding is now extremely robust and is defined as follows...
@Local
public interface DBLocal<Entity, RecNo, T extends Entity> {
     * Retuns a List of all {@code <Entity>} records that match the search
     * criteria based on the type of search.
     * @param entitySub the entity subclass object that contains the values
     * to be used in searching. These values <b>must</b> be in
     * the correct fields in order for the search to be accurate. Eg: If a
     * request is done to search for all records that have names that match
     * according to a persons name, then a <code>getName()</code> method on
     * the {@code entity} subclass would be expected to
     * <ol>
     * <li> not return null
     * </li>
     * <li> Return the value "Tom" if the user wishes to find all records
     * that have the name "Tom".
     * </ol>
     * @param typeOfSearch the <code>SearchType</code> that is to be done.
     * @return a List of all {@code <Entity>} records that match the search
     * criteria based on the type of search.
     * @see phonebook.util.SearchType
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the search criteria provided is
     * incorrect for the type of search requested.
     * @throws DataAccessException if an underlying error causes the search to
     * fail.
    public List findBySearchType(T entitySub, SearchType typeOfSearch)
            throws DataAccessException;As you can see I am aiming for an interface that I can use as a utility class. Type T is a subclass of the entity that this interface is mostly being used for and will always be a subclass created specifically to hold the search data. The SearchType is an enum that contains an enumeration of the search types allowed.
Yes it may not be normal to provide a phone number and then search but I have seen this functionality where one can go online and do a search based solely on the number entered. Anyway I thing I found a design that is reusable now and my problem is solved.
Many thanks
Yucca
Edited by: Yucca on Jul 17, 2009 8:33 PM

Set filter for only one column in tableview

Hi
i am using in MVC a htmlb:tableview with filter in only one column of 8.
This is all working fine, except that the user can enter a searchsting in the filterfield for all columns, but in handle_event (of the controller) ; i only react to a text in the filterfield of column 4 and ignore all other filtertext , which were maybe entered in the other columns.
My question:
how can i enter the filter only for one column, in a way that the user cannot enter any text in the filterfield of the other columns, only in column 4 ?
my view:
<htmlb:tableView id             = "requirements"
                 table          = "//model/pdst_reqs"
                 filter         = "APPLICATION"
                 keyColumn       = "EXTID"
                 iterator        = "<%=model%>"
                 footerVisible   = "FALSE"
                 encode          = "TRUE"
                 visibleRowCount = "<%=model->rowcount%>"
                 width           = "100%"/>
Best Regards
Britta

You can disbale the Filter for the particular column by setting the DISABLE_FILTER in the Iterator method IF_HTMLB_TABLEVIEW_ITERATOR~GET_COLUMN_DEFINITIONS. Here is the sample code
method IF_HTMLB_TABLEVIEW_ITERATOR~GET_COLUMN_DEFINITIONS .
CLEAR p_column_definitions.
CLEAR p_overwrites.
data tv_column TYPE TABLEVIEWCONTROL.
tv_column-COLUMNNAME          = 'FLDATE'.
tv_column-SORT                = 'X'.
tv_column-EDIT                = 'X'.
tv_column-ONCELLCLICK         = 'MyCellClick1'.
tv_column-title               = 'Date '.
APPEND tv_column TO p_column_definitions.
CLEAR tv_column.
tv_column-COLUMNNAME          = 'PRICE'.
tv_column-horizontalAlignment = 'right'.
tv_column-verticalAlignment   = 'middle'.
tv_column-ONCELLCLICK         = 'MyCellClick2'.
tv_column-title               = 'Currency'.
tv_column-EDIT                = 'X'.
tv_column-DISABLE_FILTER      = 'X'.    " <-------Like this
APPEND tv_column TO p_column_definitions.
endmethod.
Hope this will solve your problem.
Raja

Regarding Instance Filter for instance search

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for