Regarding PM Settelment

Dear All SAP SDN Guru's
I am settling cost on maintenance ORDER through ko88 with automatic processing type, in some maintenance orders, system is not settling the full cost instead it is settling cost partially.
For example, I created a maintenance ORDER with PM03 control key (external services), there are three services with different rates, planed and actual cost are almost same only with some minor difference, but when I settled the ORDER after TECO , the system is not fully settling the cost, it is settling partially.
Need your help
Bujji SAP PM

did u know you previous questions have been deleted for viloating the forum rules??
reported again to SCN
pk

Similar Messages

How to get the Full and final settelment date from PC_payresults

Hi Experts..sairam.
We are preparing Functional specification for a report on Full and final settelement.
We need to extract the full and final settelement date from payresults.
Full and final settelement would be an offcycle run.
How can we identify the particular Offcycle is meant for full and final settelment.
Full and final settelement can be done after date of relieving.
Please share your ideas to get the field names and logic to fetch.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sairam.

Hi Praveen,
I found it from HRPY_RGDIR through SE11.
But im in confusion in thinking on Logic to find the Full and final settelment processed date.
First of all..Report has to check WPBP table weather Employment status is Zero.
Later..It has to read the HRPY_RGDIR table.
Here what the system to check.What conditions to be validated to fetch the Full and final settelment processed date.Will it be FPPER and INPER as 00000000 or shall we do it from offcycle reason.
Please share your ideas.Thanks in advance.
Regards,Sairam.

Problem with Settelment Rule for iw32

Hi,
Good day guys
Iam getting the problem while creating the settelment rule creation. Ive got a problem with " wa_srules-SOURCE     = '1' ".
If i wont fill this field, settelment rule is going to be created. but i need to fill this field as per requirement.
Ive got a error message "Enter an Existing source assingment for souce stracutre CS.
Plz any one guide me, how to overcome this prob
DATA: srules TYPE srules_ext OCCURS 0,
      wa_srules TYPE srules_ext,
      lv_mandt type SYMANDT.
DATA IT_OBJNR TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF IONRB WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: ls_copadata type BAPI_COPA_DATA occurs 0.
DATA: ls_cobrb type standard table of cobrb with header line.
IT_OBJNR-OBJNR = CAUFVD_IMP-OBJNR.
APPEND IT_OBJNR.
break-point.
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SRULE_PRE_READ'
EXPORTING
   I_PFLEGE               = ' '
TABLES
   T_SENDER_OBJNR          = IT_OBJNR
*   T_COBRA                =
EXCEPTIONS
   WRONG_PARAMETERS       = 1
   OTHERS                 = 2
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_EXISTENCE'
EXPORTING
    objnr                = caufvd_imp-objnr
*   FLG_LOCAL            = ' '
* IMPORTING
*   E_COBRA              =
EXCEPTIONS
   RULE_NOT_FOUND       = 1
   OTHERS               = 2
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SRULE_CREATE'
EXPORTING
   i_objnr                   = caufvd_imp-objnr
*     I_CHECK_ONLY_LOCAL        = ' '
*   IMPORTING
*     E_COBRA                   =
EXCEPTIONS
rule_already_exists       = 1
OTHERS                    = 2.
wa_srules-SOURCE     = '1'.
wa_srules-settl_type = 'FUL'.
wa_srules-percentage = '100'.
*wa_srules-amount     = ''.
wa_srules-COMP_CODE = caufvd_imp-bukrs.
*wa_srules-PROFIT_CTR = caufvd_imp-PRCTR.
*wa_srules-costcenter = caufvd_imp-kostl.
wa_srules-costcenter = '10-60'.
APPEND wa_srules TO srules.
wa_srules-SOURCE     = '1'.
wa_srules-settl_type = 'PER'.
wa_srules-percentage = '100'.
*wa_srules-amount     = ''.
wa_srules-COMP_CODE = caufvd_imp-bukrs.
*wa_srules-PROFIT_CTR = caufvd_imp-PRCTR.
*wa_srules-costcenter = caufvd_imp-kostl.
wa_srules-costcenter = '10-60'.
APPEND wa_srules TO srules.
CALL FUNCTION 'K_ORDER_SRULE_ADD'
EXPORTING
    object_no                  = caufvd_imp-objnr
* IMPORTING
*   FLG_RULE_INSERTED          =
tables
    srules                     = srules
IF sy-subrc = 0.
commit work.
Endif
Regards
Edited by: balaji kiran on Mar 26, 2010 10:18 AM

Hello Vitaliy,
Nice to "see" you here
I did try remodelling and it works fine here. A constant value rule really gets a constant value.
The user exit option also works fine here. Here's an example of a very simple user exit for a KF:
method IF_RSCNV_EXIT~EXIT.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <l_s_old> TYPE ANY,
                 <l_fillfield> TYPE ANY,
                 <l_newfield> TYPE ANY,
                 <fs_kfsource> type any.
* Assign the references to field symbols
ASSIGN c_r_newfield->* TO <l_newfield>.
ASSIGN i_r_old->* TO <l_s_old>.
* We will use the value of the 0AMOUNT KF. The value of the new KF is 0AMOUNT + 5.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'AMOUNT' OF STRUCTURE <l_s_old> TO <fs_kfsource>.
<l_newfield> = <fs_kfsource> + 5.
endmethod.
For a KF, you can check the fields of the FACT Table (/BIx/Fzzzz) to know the field names for your source KFs.
Hope this helps.

Order settellement

When i am creating pm order after confirmation i will get the status settelment rule created after settelement when i nam going to close the order i will get message save only and log but in log order is not zero.
any body can give solution.

Hi Shivanand,
To check the balance of order use the transaction S_ALR_87013003 - Orders: Actual Period Comparison.Maintain the controlling area,Fiscal Year and Mention the order number, execute the report, the system will show the consumption value of the order with all cost element over the period. Check whether the settlement is done for the period. if balance is not zero then settle the amount to the particular month.
If the consumption for last year also then check for last year too. The balance of the order should be zero over the period of time and all month, then only you can close the order.
Regards,
Raj

Investment Order Settelment Ko88

Hi, All
While running the settelment of Investment Order to AUC i Am getting the error like below,
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 002 not filled
Message no. GLT2201
Diagnosis
The field Profit Center marked as balancing is not filled with any value in line item 002, even after document splitting.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
First check your entries.
Additional causes could be:
No value can be derived for this field from the current document data.
You have entered a document type that is not designed for this business purpose.
i checked all the settings, unable to find out the solution.
My document Splitting is Mandatory check for Profit centre and Business Area.
The Investment Order has both profit centre and Business Area filled in master.
Please Suggest.

Hi,
There would be 2 situations under which Error GLT2201 would pop up:
SITUATION 1 :
Kindly go to transaction code ACSET and check if you have activated the Account assignment feild for Account assignment object KOSTL.This   feild needs to be checked.
SITUATION 2 :
When the feild status for cost center and profit center have been suppressed in FS03.Kindly do the below required chnages to get rid of the error -
FS03 -> G/L account no. XXXXXX -> Field Status Group XXXX
        -> Additional Account Assignments
          -> Cost center   -> Suppressed
          -> Profit center -> Suppressed
The error is gotten in the first line item of document. This line item corresponds to the posting of account XXXXXX.Please simulate the document(F-90) to find the account.
Please change the field status for this account and test if ABIF is working without the error.
Please also see:
684659 : FAQ concerning account assignment objects as of Release 4.70
Regards Bernhard

K_SETTLEMENT_RULES_UPDATE the settelment rule

Hi,
Ive created the settement rule. its fine.. if the end user change the Maintenance activity type[cobrb-ilart] in iw32.
the settelment rule should be updated or re-write..
ive got K_SETTLEMENT_RULES_UPDATE. function module.
how to pass the parameters to above f.m. bcoz in my save function exit ive got only cobrb itab data..?
Plz let me know hwo to do it?
Regards
Edited by: balaji kiran on Apr 15, 2010 8:24 AM

Hi Balaji,
I have created WBS elements using BAPI but in tht BAPI there were no fields relating to Settelement Rules.
I need to update Account Assignment category and Settlemnt Recvr Etc.
Can u please tell me how to upload r can u please give me the sample code.?
Thanks in Advance.
Sameer

Accounting entry missing after settelment

Hi,
I am facing a problem while running of settelement i am not gettting any accounting entry. i will give brief of my scenerio:-
1. Creation of Project.
2. Incurred actual cost/revenue
3. Running RA for Project
4. Settelement of WBS to profitaibility segment.
I need the accounting entry of WIP which is missing after settelment run.
Thanking you
Vishal Kr. Sharma

for your quick reply
yes i can able to see the RA Documents.
and let me know if i missing any transaction in WIP caculation.
Regards
Vishal

PM order settelment info

Hi,
How i come to know that all PM orders are settled and pending to settle.
Any t code .
Thannks
Vishal

hi vishal
When u open any order in iw32 click on cost tab. Here actual cost will show u some value.
this value is to be settle. If u click Extras>cost reports>planned/actual comparison
one report will disply. Here if ur total actual cost is zero that means ur order is setteled.
Regards,,
Prasad

PM Order Settelment

Dear PM Experts,
I have some orders in TECO status having some actual costs (accumulated cost) on it. I want to segregate the orders which are settled and which need to be settled.
1) Please let me know how can I find out the orders which need to be settle or still not settled?
2) Is there any change in order's system status or any ware else after settlement of order?
Thank you for your explanation.
Regards,
Vishal T

hi vishal
When u open any order in iw32 click on cost tab. Here actual cost will show u some value.
this value is to be settle. If u click Extras>cost reports>planned/actual comparison
one report will disply. Here if ur total actual cost is zero that means ur order is setteled.
Regards,,
Prasad

Auc settelement

Dear all,
i have a problem at AUC settelement ,
i am usig T-code AIBU, system is giving error - "transaction type 345 not possible -(due to affiliated company posting).
but my transactions are not relating to any another company codes, i am settling with in company one company code.
please give solution for this
Regards

Hi Sudhir,
AUC can never be settled, the value is stored temporarily in Master data, once the assets start givng the tangible benefits it is settled to a fullfledged asset.
Regards
Bharat

KO88 :Actual settelment Order

Dear All Experts,
With tcode KO88 , Actual Settelemt Order , when i execute in test mode it;s giving error
"Low value asset max.amount exceeded. No posting allowed, Message No. AA614."
It's a low value asset. My Asset value is Rs. 4600 which i want to settel.
In, SPRO I have given Amount for low value assets is Rs. 5000.
Is there anything to check for maximum amount.
Pl help me for above error message.
Regards
Swati

Hello Venkat,
Thanx for prompt reply.
Now, as per your suggestion, checked my data and my inputs are as under.
for,
1. In Specify Maximum Amount for Low Value Assets + Asset Classes , for all Depreciation Areas did you give LVA --> 1
    Here I have given Depreciation Areas LVA ---> 1.
2. In Maintain Allocation Structure -->OKO6 , in Assignments did you give IA for Assignments
    Here I have some entries in Allocation structure but could not understand 'IA for Assignment'.
3. In Internal Order, under Settlement Rule did you give FXA, ASSET NO., 100%, FULL
   Here, Given FXA, ASSET NO., 100%, AUC
4. In KO88, give Internal Order Number, Settlement Period (Current Period), fiscal year and processing type = Automatic.
   Here, given Settlement Period : 4 ,
            Fiscal Year : 2009,
            Posting Period : 4,
           Asset Value Date : 01.07.2009 and
           Processsing type = 3 Partial Capitalization.
With above inputs it's giving error message.
Pl suggest me something else to check.
Regards
Swati

Order settelement without standard cost estimate

Hello,
My Scenario MTS,
Client doest not want to take Cost roll up (Standard cost estimate run) the price control code 'S' for all the Finish goods, Semifinish
and raw materials.
In this how to handle order settelment , variance calculation without standard cost estimate.
Please provide configuration steps also.

Hi,
Can you let us know why your client does not want to update the std. cost price for a material?
One of the key reasons for implementing SAP or any ERP system is to monitor the cost & value flows within the organization. Unless there is some compelling business need for it, you should strongly advise your client to go for costing of parts / assemblies.
However if no costing is done & the std. price is '0' then if the activities have prices maintained, then when a confirmation is posted only the activity cost will be posted on the order. The variance calculated will then show only the difference if any b/n plan / target / actual activity costs, while part cost will remain zero.
Regards,
Vivek

Regarding sy-index and sy-tabix

Hi,
What is the major difference between sy-index and sy-tabix ,
can you give me one good example with code..
Regards,
Reddy.

Hi,
SY-TABIX - Current line of an internal table. SY-TABIX is set by the statements below, but only for index tables. The field is either not set or is set to 0 for hashed tables.
APPEND sets SY-TABIX to the index of the last line of the table, that is, it contains the overall number of entries in the table.
COLLECT sets SY-TABIX to the index of the existing or inserted line in the table. If the table has the type HASHED TABLE, SY-TABIX is set to 0.
LOOP AT sets SY-TABIX to the index of the current line at the beginning of each loop lass. At the end of the loop, SY-TABIX is reset to the value that it had before entering the loop. It is set to 0 if the table has the type HASHED TABLE.
READ TABLE sets SY-TABIX to the index of the table line read. If you use a binary search, and the system does not find a line, SY-TABIX contains the total number of lines, or one more than the total number of lines. SY-INDEX is undefined if a linear search fails to return an entry.
SEARCH FOR sets SY-TABIX to the index of the table line in which the search string is found.
SY_INDEX - In a DO or WHILE loop, SY-INDEX contains the number of loop passes including the current pass.
sy-tabix is the tab index - the index of the record in the internal table you are accessing,
sy-index is the loop counter.
If you use a condition in LOOP the sy-index will go from 1 to n, but sy-tabix will refer to the line in the internal table.
Hope this helps u.
Thanks,
Ruthra

Regarding Field Missing in Dso Transformation

Hi
Folks
I am facing the issue like
In Datasouce to DSO transformation i can see the 55 objects in DSO table, and in DSO to Cube Transformation i can see 54 fields in DSO table, one field is missing , the object 0TXTSH(short discription) is mapped to field 0TXZ01in DS to DSO transformation.
so How can i get the field in DSO to Cube transformation.??
any settings have to be change???
waiting for yours Valuable answers
Regards
Anand

Hi,
Please identify the object and check it whether it is an attribute or a characteristic, if it is attribute only disable that option then check it.
Regards,
Srinivas

I am having an issue regarding a placed order via customer service department

I recently relocated to Anchorage Alaska as part of a permanent change of station per the United States Air Force. I was initially located on the East Coast in the lower 48 and at the time of activating my contract I had purchased two separate Iphone 4 devices. I also recently went in to a store in February to purchase a Nexus 7 as well.
Upon arrival in Anchorage I had multiple issues regarding the Iphone 4 devices including being unable to send and receive text messages & imessages, unable to make phone calls, dropped phone calls, unable to utilize GPS, as well as not being able to access general account information and use anything related to web browsing or data usage. It was determined that because the Iphone 4 operates on the 3g network and Verizon does not have a 3g network in Alaska, as a result I was utilizing an extended service network from another carrier. As a result of this I am only able to use my Iphone 4 devices while connected to my wi-fi network while within my home, which is totally unacceptable.
I was not made aware that I would be dealing with this when I moved to Alaska and inquired as the the use of the devices I currently owned prior to purchasing the tablet. I was assured by three separate store employees one of which being a manager that all devices would function at 100% efficiency including the Iphone 4s. In fact I was recently billed 350$ for roaming charges last month, which prompted me to speak with a representative via the online chat regarding the significant increase she said that she was unable to process any sort of credit to the account regardless of what I had been told at a local Verizon store where I purchased the tablet.
As a result of all of these mishaps since arriving here in Alaska I determined I was in need of newer devices that utilize the 4G LTE network currently provided by Verizon in Alaska. I know for a fact that the 4G LTE works great up here because my Nexus 7 tablet runs flawlessly and does not incur roaming charges when utilizing the 4G LTE network.
Yesterday I attempted to contact Verizon through the live chat feature regarding upgrading two of the devices on my account. The live chat representative immediately asked me when my upgrade date was. Upon telling her my upgrade date 9/29/2014 she told me I should contact the customer service department as I might be eligible for an early upgrade. I then proceeded to contact the customer service department using my Iphone 4.
My attempt to speak to anyone in the customer service department resulted in a merry-go-round of being put on hold 6 separate times by two different employees, both of which had me wait for more than an hour while they attempted to speak to a manager to gain approval for an early upgrade. The first rep seemed almost sure she would be able to have my devices upgraded early especially considering the issues I was having regarding service.
The second rep seemed newer and was very dodgy about my questions and was very unwilling to help at first. He even mentioned that I had been a Verizon customer for almost two years, had never missed a single payment and had outstanding account history which should have garnered some sort of importance to the level of my request. But I digress, during this time I was disconnected from the call twice from each separate representative.
Both reps assured me they would call me back, I never did get a call back from either one of those reps and I was becoming very frustrated having waited four hours trying to find some sort of solution to my current predicament.
After waiting an hour for the second representative to call back I grew impatient and contacted the customer service department, was put on hold again, and finally reached a third customer service representative who was able to provide a solution for me.
I explained everything I had been dealing with to Cory ID # V0PAC61, both regarding the phones, the issue of the level of service I was receiving, the dire need for working devices and the multiple times I had been disconnected. I explained to him as a result of these issues I was certainly considering switching to a different provider, a local provider even who could provide me the adequate service that I require for my mobile devices.
I explained to Cory that I had been with Verizon for almost two years, and I had been on a relatives account prior to owning my own Verizon account and had never received this kind of treatment when trying to work towards a simple solution. Cory proceeded to tell me he needed to put me on hold to see if there was anything that could be done regarding the upgrades of the device considering all of the trouble I had been dealing with.
After Cory reconnected with me in the phone call he was able to successfully reach a solution by allowing me to upgrade my devices. We conversed about the options available and I eventually decided to upgrade both Iphone 4 devices to Moto X devices as we determined those would be sufficient for my needs while in Alaska. I also proceeded to add two Otter Box Defender cases to the order so that the devices would have sufficient protection. Cory inquired as to whether or not I would like to purchase insurance for the phones as well and I opted for the $5.00 monthly insurance which including damage and water protection.
Cory explained to me the grand total for the devices which included an activation fee of $35.00 for each device, $49.99 for each Otter Box case, and an additional $50.00 for each device which would be refunded as a rebate upon receipt of the devices and activation, a rebate that I would be required to submit. Cory explained to me that the devices would most likely arrive Tuesday of 6/17 and no later than Wednesday 6/18.
Cory took my shipping information and told me everything was all set and the only thing left to do was to transfer me to the automated service so that I could accept the 2 year agreement for both devices. I thanked him very much, took his name and ID# so that I might leave positive feedback about his exemplary customer service and was then transferred to the automated service.
Once transferred to the automated service I was then prompted to enter both telephone numbers for the devices that would be upgraded, I was then required to accept the new 2 year agreement for both devices and after doing so I was required to end the call. I did so in an orderly fashion and expected a confirmation # to arrive in my email regarding the placed order.
I have never received a confirmation email. I decided to sleep on it and assumed a confirmation email would be sent sometime tomorrow. Nothing has since been received however. I woke up early this morning around 6AM Alaska time to speak to another live chat representative, Bryan, in the billing department who assured me the order was currently processing and verified the order #. I asked him whether or not it was typical for a customer to not receive a confirmation email for an order placed and he said it can sometimes take up to 2-3 business days. He then stated that he had taken note of the issues I was experiencing and told me he would transfer me to the sales department as they would be able to provide more information regarding the shipment of both devices and a confirmation email, as he stated he did not want me to have to wait any longer than necessary to receive said devices.
I was then transferred to Devon in the sales department via the live chat service where I was then required to repeat everything I had said to both Bryan and the other representatives I had spoken too. After a lengthy discussion and repeating everything I have just wrote he told me the order was indeed processing and that he would send a confirmation email in the next 30 minutes.
That was 2 hours ago. It is now 8am Alaska time and I still have not received a confirmation email regarding my order. I was sent an email by Verizon an hour ago stating I had a device to "discover". The email contained no information regarding the shipment of my device, the order confirmation number, or anything regarding my account. The email I received was a typical spam email asking an individual to check out the current available phones and sign up for a new contract.
All I want is a confirmation email to assure that the devices are being sent. I need my phone for work and to communicate with my family in the lower 48. I desperately need to make sure that the device is in fact being sent to the proper address, this is why a confirmation email of the order is so important. I do not care about the shipping speed I just want what I ask to be taken care of for a change. I would hate to sit here unable to determine what the status of my devices are only for the order to be stuck in "processing" limbo and be unable to receive the devices when I was told they would be sent.
I feel I have been given the run around treatment way more than is typically given with any company when an individual is trying to work towards a solution. I have been patient and cordial with everyone I have spoken with, I have not raised my voice or shown stress or anger towards the situation I have only tried my best to work towards a solution with anyone I have spoken too but I am becoming increasingly frustrated with this situation.
Any help regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. This situation has left a sour taste in my mouth and if the devices were indeed not actually processed in an order, or they were not shipped correctly, or in fact if the order had never existed at all it will only deter me from keeping my Verizon account active and affect my decision to switch to another provider.

Hello APVzW, we absolutely want the best path to resolution. My apologies for multiple attempts of replacing the device. We'd like to verify the order information and see if we can locate the tracking number. Please send a direct message with the order number so we can dive deeper. Here's steps to send a direct message: http://vz.to/1b8XnPy We look forward to hearing from you soon.
WiltonA_VZW
VZW Support
Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

Regarding PM Settelment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for