Remapped Cross-Company GL Postings do not post as expected

We are remapping charges made to one company code to two or more other codes and expect the payment to come directly from the company that was charged.
However, all charges are sent to one company code and the
final payment is made from that single company code.
Is this standard SAP or can it be configured to post differently?
I have tried different Document types but it continues to post the same.  This happens every time we run a remap file. We have used the IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS function module - which ultimately calls the Post_document function module, and I have also tested with several
BAPIs including BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST and BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.
In transaction FBU3, you see two charges in company code 1200. They are to be remapped to codes 1300
and 5000, one charge each. Instead of each company paying 1200 directly, 5000 (which is Canada if that makes a difference) pays 1300 and then 1300 makes one single payment to 1200.
I can provide a screen shot for anyone interested.  I hope this is clear.
Thank you,
Chris Mowl
ABAP Developer
Fossil, Inc.

Moving to a different thread.

Similar Messages

  • Value date cross company code postings

    Dear all,
    it is possible to influence the value date on a company code level via the transaction OB68. With this transaction you can state that the current date is used as the default value for the value date when entering line items.This works fine when posting a G/L posting within the same company code.
    When entering a cross company code posting, the indicator in transaction OB68 is ignored and the document date is used to be proposed as default value for the value date.
    Does anyone know which SAP parameters can influence the value date for cross company code postings ? If this is not standard SAP possible, does anyone already encountered this problem and, if so, how did one solve this issue ?
    Many thanks,
    Regards,
    Kristof

    thank you for the reply ... unfortunately I expected some Z-programmation

  • While doing cross company code postings I get an error

    Hi experts,
    I have an issue on cross company code postings through FB60. There is a vendor account which has been extended to both company codes. The amount of invoice is Rs.10000 of which 6000 to be accounted in company code 1000 and 4000 in company code 5000. When this is done we get an error 'A unique company code has not been assigned to company number A001'.
    After trying several options, I have found one solution. In the test system I Went to classify FI  document types for document splitting, against document type KR transaction 0300 (Vendor invoice) was there. I changed to 0000 (unspecified posting). Once this was done, I was able to post cross company transactions without any problem.
    I would like to know as to what would be the impact? Would this change create any other issue?
    I request you to give your expert opinion on this.
    Regards,
    Ramkumar B.
    Duplicate thread, therefore it will be locked, please avoid creating different threads for the same subject.
    check the responses in thread While doing cross company code postings I get an error
    FI Moderator

    Dear,
    When you are posting vendor Invoice through FB60 then system creates accounting document "KR" and when document splitting is activated in system the you have to assign Doc type KR to Transaction 0300 and 0001.
    This is standard requirement. There will not be any changes by doing this.
    Hope it is clear..
    Br,Vivek

  • Cross-company code postings - FI validation

    Hi,
    We start using the cross-company code postings (transaction OBYA) between company code A and company code B and have to give authorizations both company codes to the Finance users. The idea is to have a set of G/L accounts which are allowed to be used when company code A and B are posted via cross-company code posting.
    SAP recommends to implement a validation in FI to restrict the Intercompany scenatios. I attempted to create a FI validation for complete document (call-point 3) with no success:
    1)
    IC Rule: BSEG-BUKRS = A and BSEG-BUKRS = B and BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
    Prerequisite: TRUE
    Check: IC rule
    Message: E-  Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
    When I test it, the Intercompany clearing account configured in OBYA, and which is in ACCOUNTSET, shows up in the error message, which unwanted.
    2)
    IC Rule 1: BKPF-BUKRS = '0017' AND BKPF-BUKRS = '0005'
    IC Rule 2: BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
    Prerequisite: TRUE
    Check: IC Rule 1 --> IC Rule 2
    Message: E-  Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
    No error message is issued at all, even if the G/L account is not in ACCOUNTSET.
    Please advise what I am missing.

    Hi Nitin,
    Thank you for your feeback.
    I just wanted to clarify that the cross-company code posting is when company code A can intitiate a posting to company code B simultaneously (for example Intercompany re-charge, cash concentration, etc.). The trigger for cross-company code posting is the company code field on the line item. If company code A is in the header (BKPF-BUKRS) and at least one document line item filled up as company code B, the system created two documents for each company code, offsetting the Intercompany clearing account, configured in OBYA.
    For example:
    Posting via FB50: Leading company code = company code A (BKPF-BUKRS)
    Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200; Company code A (as a default)
    Item 2: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100; Company code B (manually changed)
    Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300; Company code A (as a default)
    The systen creates two postings:
    Posting 1: company code A
    Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200;
    Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300;
    Item 2: Debit ; I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
    Posting 2: company code B
    Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100;
    Item 2: Credit;I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
    The only connection between the two is the cross-company code number (BKPF-BVORG), which assigned by the system once posted, as a logical connection.
    I guess we could use a dedicated document type. If that's the case, how would the validation work then?
    Coudl you please share more details on the BTE option?
    Thank you,
    Inna

  • Restrict cross CO area postings and allow cross company code postings

    " There are two Controlling areas CA01 and CA02, for the controlling area CA02 the field CO code validation is inactive to allow cross company code postings ie., (Cost center created in one company code can be used as cost object in other company code ) Also this allows any WBS element created in controlling area CA01 as cost object in any of the company codes assigned in controlling area CA02,
    Due to usage of WBS element which is created in CA01 controlling area as cost object in company code belongs to controlling area CA02, business is facing problem while doing the settlement run with error message " Document data for list of origins does not exist"
    So, I have activated the field Co code validation in the controlling area CA02, which stopped the usage of WBS element between controlling areas. Also this had restricted usage of cost object between company codes with in controlling area CA02.
    Now is there anyway to allow cost object usage between company codes assigned in one controlling area (CA02) and restrict usage of WBS element created in controlling area CA01 in any company code assigned in controlling area CA02.

    Hi,
    As you have already activated the Co Code validation you cant restrict that only to WBS. But you can have another option
    Use the validation process to restrict these errors
    This may help
    Regards
    Shantanu

  • Prevent cross-company code postings for certain document type

    Hi all!
    I am looking for a possibility to prevent users from posting a "cross-company code posting" just for a certain document type.
    I checked validation rules and BTEs but without success. Do you have an idea?
    Thanks for any support.
    Michael

    Thanks for your reply. I have already tried to use a validation rule, but without success.
    It did not work as the relevant field "New company code" (NEWBK) in not part of BKPF or BSEG, but (only) of structure RF05A. Thus, I cannot use the field in a validation rule.
    Or is there a way to make RF05A fields available for use in validation rules?
    Regards, Michael

  • Cross Company Purchase / Sales Header Condition Posting to AP

    Hi All Expert,
    I don't know whether it is SD question or not,
    My company already config Cross-Company Purchase, for STO Purchase Order, and create DN using VL10b.
    Once create Invoice using VF01, it will generate AR and AP invoice using the EDI.
    The question is, now I want to add a surcharge to the AR and AP invoice.
    It is the percentage of the total amount base on the Material type, so I've add a condition table using VK11.
    Its work fine from retrieve the percentage and calculate the surcharge amount.
    I've also config the Account Key and generate the AR document successfully.
    However, I've no idea how to add the surcharge in the AP invoice side....
    I think it need to config the EDI.. but I cannot find the Account Assignment for the surcharge.
    Please give more information how to implement the surcharge.
    Thanks.
    Terry

    I've done it by another method.

  • Could you please help us for asset depreciation postings are not posted

    HI
    can any body help,
    while creating asset  acqistion date 22 january 2010 and  Capitalized date is December 18 2009, but depriciation caliculating from  acqisition date , where is the mistake happen we did not get , please guide me
    thanks
    Ranamka

    Hi
    we did custimization is correct as you said , multilevel level method Validity start is  "from ordinary start data"
    while creating asset  using as01 we maitained depreciation start is  18.12.2009, but it is considering 22.01.2010 which is first acquisition  date
    as under stand , both dates calander year is different  2009,2010 and my fiscal year is calander year , so system automatically considering current fiscal year , becuase 2009 periods already closed
    please let me know where was the mistake
    thanks
    Rananka

  • F-02 Docment posted for cross company code TAX

    Dear Experts ,
    Can you please explain me ,
    when i posted docment in F-02 for cross company code postings that is Dr for 1150 company code and credit for 5500 company code ,
    1] i need to enter tax  code is YY is same to both company codes 1150 & 5500
    ] i need to enter  tax jurisdiction code for company code 1150 is 1254693  and company code 5500 is 4525658
    when i enter these two Tax jurisdiction code system shows error when i saved error message # FF 744
    ERROR MESSAGE  BELOW
    [  The jurisdiction codes entered on the individual line items have different controls for determinating the cash discount base amount (upper level  and ).
    This is not allowed within a document.
    Procedure
    Please correct the entered jurisdiction code (if not correct) or if need be, post the transaction to two single documents.
    Can you please help me how i enter postings in F-02
    Regards
    Bhaskar

    Thanks

  • Bank statment cross company postings

    Hi,
    we want some of the items in bank statement post to bank clearing account in another company code. How we achieve that
    Following are the details
    Company code = ABC
    House bank  =  def
    In bank statement from house bank Def there are items that needs to be posted to Company code = GHI
                                   Dr Bank def  company code ABC
                                   cr intercompany ghi
                                   cr  Clearing   company code GHI
                                    Dr intercompany ABC
    kindly advise
    Umang

    Hello,
    The SAP note 124655 explains the following:
    The electronic bank statement is not designed for cross-company code
    postings (this also applies to the manual bank statement). You can,
    however, create these postings manually, for instance by the
    subsequent processing of BI sessions or using Transaction FEBA.
    However, this can lead to unwanted results in the document display
    of Transaction FEBA. In this case, this is not caused by any errors
    but missing system functions.
    REgards,
    Renan COrrea

  • Prevent CO cross company postings - cobl-bukrs ?

    Hi,
    the last time I created a CO validation to prevent cross company CO postings is so long ago, that I can not remember. But i remeber something like "sender comp code <> receiv comp code".
    I am trying to creat this again, but do not find the cobl field for receiving company code.
    The I fould KM 0120025231 0000491809 2006 (KB21N does not check company code for intercompany posting)
    where the solution is to be:
    Prerequisite: "No precondition necessary" TRUE              
    Check: COBL-BUKRS <> COBL-BUKRS                             
    Message: own created message ZZ 010 as a Message type 'E'   
    1. this prevents now all postings not only cross company
    2. I dont get the idea of COBL-BUKRS <> COBL-BUKRS (like if 1 <> 1 which could never happen)
    Hints highly appreciated
    Bjoern

    Hi Bjoern,
    Eli is right. I just had look at the old message. Basically she was right...you might have overlooked that she was refering to event "2"...hence the validation rule is:
    COBL_RECEIVER-BUKRS < > COBL_SENDER-BUKRS
    Regards
    Karl
    Edited by: Karl Helm on Mar 12, 2009 4:14 PM

  • Transfer posting of tax in a cross company code transaction thru' RFBUST10

    Hi,
    I have a doubt regarding using the program RFBUST10 transferring the tax in a cross company transaction.
    I have posted an invoice entry as below and I want to transfer the tax posting of 7.00 from company code 1 to company code 2 using the program RFBUST10.
    Cr - 31 - 3rd party vendor - total amount of invoice co code 1 - 214.00
    Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00 co code 1 - C7 (Tax code at 7%)
    Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00  to co code 2 C7 (Tax code at 7%)
    I have successfully posted and the tax amount of 7.00 is also transferred from company code 1 to company code2 but now I have 2  problems:
    1) The program (RFBUST10)  is permitting to transfer  tax for the same cross- company code document multiple times. Please let me know how to track whether the cross company code document is already processed for transfer posting of tax.
    2) In the transfer posting document as below ,the  tax code in the first line item (clearing account) is defaulted to C0 , I would like to know from where this tax code defaults, I have not maintained the default tax code in the GL master.
    Dr - 40 clearing Account 107 - C0 (tax code 0%)
    Cr- 50 clearing account 100 - C7(tax code at 7%)
    Cr - 50 Tax account 7  C7
    Please let me know how to resolve these issues.
    Tks
    SS

    hi venkat sri,
    gud day, did you manage to solve the transfer intercompany tax using program RFBUST10? Could you share the solution?
    Looking forward for your reply.
    Regards,
    Jay

  • Cross Company code posting is available for recurring payment setup?

    Hi All,
    I could not find the cross company code field for recurring payment setup with useing T code FBD1.
    Vendor is created in paying company code 1000, however, the rent has be booked to cross company code (1001) cost center (2000).
    So, while trying to do recurring payment setup, I could not see the field.
    I know the alternative option that i can use the "Cost Center(1000)" is assigned to CoCd 1000 and do recurring setup without useing cross company code, later i can post the manual journal for correction (as below), however, I do not want use this option.
    Dr/Cr       CoCd                         GL account            Cost Center           Amount
    Dr            1001                         Rent account          2000                      XXXXX
    Cr            1000                         Rent account          1000                      XXXXX
    Please let me know your thoughts on this.
    Thanks,
    Srinivas

    Hi, ok17 is not for cross company,but for CO-FI real time integration.
    Ex. you maintained for "RKL     Actual activity allocation" Dr 123 Cr 567
    Then while posting activity allocation in CO you'll get posting like Dr 123 Cr 567   (with corresponding CO objects)

  • Cross company code reversal of an asset document does not reverse all docs

    hi,
    i have reversed a cross company code document which has posted to 2 different assets in 2 different companies. when i reversed this cross company code document, the system reversed only the first document in the first company and it does not reverse the second document in the second company. It says the second document cannot be reversed with the simple information message.
    how can we solve this?

    Hi,
    can you check if SAP note 1273856 solves your problem?
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Cross Company Sales Automatic Vendor Invoice Not Created

    Hi,
    I have an issue in Cross company Sales Scenario (Inter company Sales),
    During the Intercompany Invoice we can trigger output RD04 to create Automatic Vendor Invoice in the Ordering Company.
    I have done the necessary configuration for creating Idoc (RD04), FI & MM.
    I could able to create an Idoc successfully and the status of the Idoc is 53.
    However when I check the Vendor Invoice in the Ordering Company T.Code FBL1N, system gives me message that no items found for the Vendor.
    I request please let me know me what configuration I have to do to create Cross Company Sales Automatic Vendor Invoice
    Regards,
    Murali
    Edited by: Murali Mikkili on Jul 27, 2008 9:05 AM
    Edited by: Murali Mikkili on Jul 28, 2008 11:49 AM

    Hi Daniel,
    Both the company codes should be assigned to the same company.
    Clearing accounts must be defined in every company code before a cross-company code transaction may be carried out. The clearing accounts may be G/L accounts, customer, or vendor accounts.
    In the configuration you must assign clearing accounts to every possible combination of two company codes to allow cross-company code postings between these combinations
    To reduce the number of clearing accounts, you can use just one company code as the clearing company code. In this case, you only have to assign clearing accounts to every combination of the clearing company code
    In T-code OBYA
    For ex: company code 1000 clearing account 12345 is same for Debit and credit
    Company code 2000 Clearing account 67890 is same for debit and credit
    Posting keys must be assigned to the clearing accounts to identify their account
    types.
    Hope this helps you to solve your probelm.
    Regards,
    Mir

Maybe you are looking for