Report for all Credit / Debit Notes

Dear Experts,
Is there any report in system to generate all the Credit / Debit Notes created with details. Please help.
Thanks

Hi.. If it is Customer Debit / Credit Notes then you can take document numbers from FB03 Document list by giving document types DR and DG in selection screen
This DR and DG doc types can be taken from FBL5N also by giving document type in dynamic selections
Ramesh

Similar Messages

Which iDOC Type for Credit/Debit notes generated from SD Module ?

Hi,
We are implementing an EDI Solution for SD Invoices which would involve sending EDIFACT Messages generated out of mapping the SAP iDOC TYPE INVOIC02 to the EDIFACT fields.
We also have to send Credit and Debit Notes generated from SAP in the SD Module in the same path. We are currently planning on using INVOIC02 for doing this.
My Question: Is this the proper approach ? We don't want to use the Credit / Debit advises in FI-GL to post to Credits to Customer Account.
Is there any other iDOC Type or message type that we should be using for SD Credit/Debit Notes ?

Hi Mahesh,
Thank you for your help.
In my client location data is posted non-sap to sap through SAP XI/PI.
so i need to tell the xi guy to which IDOC is used for this interface and technical names.
Can you help me.

Display invoice print (PDF) in sales order(Credit/Debit note) attachement for Validator

Hello Expert,
I would like to know if is there any possibility to display invoice print (PDF) in sales order (Credit/Debit note) as attachment.
Issue: Customer raise the credit note with the reference of invoice, sometimes user don't explain the reason for credit and don't attach any reference document in sales order(credit request).
Customer requirement: Customer want to display reference invoice print (PDF)in sales order(Credit request) for validator so validator can cross check with invoice and validate the credit note.
Could you suggest the best solution?
I am thinking to give mandatory text box (Text determination)at sales order(Credit request)
Vipin

Hi,
You can enable Document Management System (DMS)
Please refer below links for details:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/459101
http://scn.sap.com/thread/2096563

Intercompany Billing Credit & Debit Note

Dear All,
I have configured intercompany billing. Now i can able to create invoice for Supplying part to Ordering Party. This invoice creation without sales order na. So, if i want to create credit & Debite memo for supplying party to Ordering party how to create. Because here we are creating invoice wioth out sales order and creating with reference of delivery note. In this process sales order creation belongs to ordering party to customer. So where we can maintain Credit & Debit note for Supplying party to ordering party. I think when we create invoice can we maintain billing type as credit note? please suggest me to maintain Cr. & Dr Memo In Intercompany billing between Supplying company to Ordering company.
Thanks & Regards,
Anj

Hithere,
For intercompany stock transfer if you want to implement credit & debit memo in intercompany you need to reference credit & debit memo requests CR & DR or the returns order with delivery NL. You will define them in the sales area of the supplying plant. Then you maintain the copy controls from RE to G2 / D2 or CR / DR to G2 / D2.
For intercompany sales, the customer returns the goods to the ordering plant. Not the supplying plant. Coz customer doesnot know from where the ordering plant brought the goods from. So in that case customer to ordering plant is standard returns process. Returns between the ordering & supplying plant is again like mentioned above.
Regards,
Sivanand

Workflow Approval for AR Credit/Debit Memo

Hi All,
I am looking for document on setting up Approval workflow for AR Credit / Debit Memo. Can any one share me document on how to set up AME for AR credit / debit memo approval.
Thanks & Looking forward to your reply. Please send the document to [email protected]
Regards
Siva Kalyan.

Thanks John,
the function module which you suggested SD_SALESDOCUMENT_CREATE has all the fields i require. But, i am not able to find the fields KUNAG (sold to party) and KUNWE (ship to party) in this function module to enter the data.
If i run the function module by entering all the data, i get the error asking me to enter ship to party and sold to party. Could you please help me out in finding these fields.
Thanks & Regards!

Sales document report for all open documents

hi i need the code for sales document report for all open documents is sd
... can anyone help me out.
thanks in advance

Try transaction VA05. In that choose "Open Orders" along with other selection criteria.
If you want the Open sales order qty in output and its not displayed, do the following.
Sales -> System modification -> create new fields ( without condition technique) -> New fields for lists.
You can change V05TZZMO and structure VBMTVZ from there or use SE38 / SE11.
For both you'll need an object registration in OSS.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Balaji

Need to run the report for All Values when Null is passed in parameter

Hi All,
In my BIP report, I am using a parameter :asset with Type as Text, which means user will type the values for the parameter in the text box.
Now, this parameter can take multiple comma separated values. I have a requirement to run the report for All Values when user doesn't enter any value in the parameter text box and if user enters any value(s) then the report will run for those values . The way, I tried to handle that in the query using couple of ways was :
IMP : My Database is SQL Server
where
(table.asset = isnull((:asset), table.asset) or table.asset in (:asset))
Now this works fine when I give a single asset number but when I give multiple values separated by comma like 123, 345 in the text box, then the statement fails saying 'encountered ,'
I also tried simply
table.asset in isnull((:asset),table.asset) -- but this doesn't work as it doesn't allow me to use in operater while using isnull and if i will use = operater then it won't work in case of multiple values
Any suggestions on how can I handle this? Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ronny

thanks for replying, but i tried this option too, it did not work for me, neither isnull nor coalesce. I mean, the solution work for single value but when i pass multiple values then separated by a comma then it doesn't work and shows me an error like "Incorrect Syntax ','". I am using SQL server as DB and bip is 10.1.3.4.1
also please share the SR number, so i can also check the same.
can there be any other work around to this?
thanks,
ronny

Document type for Subsequent Credit/Debit for idoc invoic01/02

Hi SAP Gurus,
We are implemeting an interface to post incoming invoice with idoc Invoic01 idoc type.
We could able to post debit invoice and credit memo using document type in idoc (BSART) as "INVO" and "CRME".
But we would also like to post Subsequent Credit/Debit memos also with this idoc type but not sure what should be used in document type field ( BSART) in idoc.
If any one has come across this scenario please suggest whether is it possible to use Invoic01 idoc type to post Subsequent Credit/Debit notes if yes what is the document types used? also I see in OBCE transaction we can only mention Invoice document type for debit and credit invoices only. How to handle this incase of subsequent Credit/Debit invoices.
Thanks.

Hello Rish,
Please, be aware that if you look at the document at MIR4/MIRO etc, they will apear as a INVOICE/CREDIT MEMO (in the "Drop down" box, in the top of transaction)even if they are sub. credit/deb, but that is the standard system behavior ! In order to check if it is a Subcequent debit/credit, you can check directly into rbkp table or even better, just check in the PO history! it will be in a separate category !
Give it a check if this is not the case!
Regards!

FI Credit/Debit note printing

Hi all,
I need to print the standard Credit/Debit notes.F140_DOCU_EXC_01 this is the SapScript.Is there any stadard way to display these FI credit/debit notes int the system.Or we need to convert it into Z.
Thanks and Regards,
Seema.

This is not standard. Not sure whether this can be achieved. But, you will end up in printing everything and your cost of stationery gets increased. What is business logic you want to automate the printing of documents.

Cenvat Adjustment for subsequent credit/debit posted

Hi Everybody,
Is it necessary to do Cenvat Adsjustment in J1IH for subsequent credit/debit posted against PO.
If i want to do adjustment how to do and for subsequent credit what's the option to be choose in J1IH and same for the subsequent debit.
Regards
Govindaraj

Hello Rish,
Please, be aware that if you look at the document at MIR4/MIRO etc, they will apear as a INVOICE/CREDIT MEMO (in the "Drop down" box, in the top of transaction)even if they are sub. credit/deb, but that is the standard system behavior ! In order to check if it is a Subcequent debit/credit, you can check directly into rbkp table or even better, just check in the PO history! it will be in a separate category !
Give it a check if this is not the case!
Regards!

Running-report-for-all-values

Hi ,
Based on this link i have implemented this logic....
http://bischool.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/avoid-running-report-for-all-values-on-dashboard-when-using-multi-select-prompt/
But for the intermediate report its taking more time to run...nearly 4min...is there any way to reduce it.
Thanks

hi User,
Quick question
Why you are giving (-1) value's as per the doc we can give any value which has to give no results? Have u tried to give some other value ?
Next,Do u have left outer joins between those tables? If yes you should face the same problem with the main report because the filters to be same as intermediate report am i right ?
First tune-up the rpd and get the main report query ,run-it over DB
Due to huge data and the join taking more time....is there way any thing to add to reduce the time??Huge data ?? Intermediate report will not get any results i think it will not take more time to give a message,but due to join conditions only it is taking long time to run
Note :Before getting value from DB it will check the where condition( joins)
Thanks,
Saichand Varanasi

Can Cisco Mars do the reporting for all devices (checkpint, ISS etc)

Is this is true that cisco mars can do the reporting for all the devices(like checkpoint, juniper, sonicwall, and IBM-ISS ) devices.
Requesting plz reply ASAP

no, it's not true. the following MARS lists what mars has direct support for:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/security_management/cs-mars/4.3/compatibility/local_controller/dtlc43x.html
Anything else would require creating a custom parser, which is great functionality to have in a pinch but is a major pita to maintain. That's one of the biggest reasons to buy a SIM in the first place, so you don't have to manage parsing yourself.

For All Entries is NOT better than INNER JOIN in most cases

I quote from Siegfried Boes' excellent post here: Will writing an inner join be better or creating a view?
For all the FOR ALL ENTRIES lovers ... there is no proof for these reappearing recommendation.
There is nearly nobody who receives forum points, who recommends FOR ALL ENTRIES instead of Joins. What is the reason ???
It is easier to prove the opposite. A Join is a nested loop inside the database, a FOR ALL ENTRIES is partly outside of the database. FOR ALL ENTRIES works in blocks, joins on totals.
FOR ALL ENTRIES are not recommded on really large tables, because the chances are too high that
too many records are transferred.
People prefer FOR ALL ENTRIES, because JOINs are not so easy to understand. Joins can go wrong, but with a bit of understanding they can be fixed.
Some Joins are slow and can not be fixed, but then the FOR ALL ENTRIES would be extremely slow.
There are several kinds of views:
- projection views, i.e. only one table involved just fields reduced
- join views, several tables, joins conditions stored in dictionary
- materialized views, here the joined data are actually stored in the database. Storing and synchronisation has to be done manually.
Only the last one creates real overhead. It should be the exception.
Join Views and Joins are nearly identical. The view is better for reuse. The join is better in complicated, becuase if the access goes wrong, it can often be fixed by adding a hint. Hints can not be added to views.
Abraham Bukit points out:
If it is cluster table, (you can't use join). If it is buffered table, I would also say avoid join.
If they all are transaction table which are not buffered and are not cluster tables.
He further supports Siegfried's statement that FAE is easier to undestand than INNER JOINs.
Thomas Zloch says, regarding buffered tables:
At least think twice, maybe compare runtimes if in doubt.
So, unless someone has some EVIDENCE that FOR ALL ENTRIES is better, I don't think we want to see this discussed further.
Kind regards
Matt

To give food for thought here's an example I gave in a thread:
If you have a statement like
SELECT ... FOR ALL ENTRIES IN FAE_itab WHERE f = FAE_itab-f.
SAP sends it to the database depending how the parameter rsdb/prefer_union_all is set:
rsdb/prefer_union_all = 0 =>
SELECT ... WHERE f = FAE_itab[1]-f
          OR    f = FAE_itab[2]-f
          OR    f = FAE_itab[N]-f
You have some influence of the generated statement type: Instead of OR'ed fields an IN list can be used
if you have only a single coulmn N to compare:
rsdb/prefer_in_itab_opt parameter:
SELECT ... WHERE f IN (itab[1]-f, itab[2]-f, ..., itab[N]-f)
rsdb/prefer_union_all = 1 =>
SELECT ... WHERE f = FAE_itab[1]-f
UNION ALL SELECT ... WHERE f = FAE_itab[2]-f
UNION ALL SELECT ... WHERE f = FAE_itab[N]-f
see: Note 48230 - Parameters for the SELECT ... FOR ALL ENTRIES statement
As you can see for the 2nd parameter several statements are generated and combined with a UNION ALL,
the first setting generates statements with OR's (or uses IN if possible) for the entries in FAE_itab.
I give you a little example here (my parameters are set in a way that the OR's are translated to IN lists; i traced the execution in ST05)
Select myid into table t_tabcount from mydbtable
for all entries in t_table    " 484 entries
    where myid = t_table-myid .
ST05 trace:
|Transaction SEU_INT|Work process no 0|Proc.type DIA|Client 200|User |
|Duration |Obj. name |Op.    |Recs.|RC    |Statement|
| 640|mydbtable |PREPARE|   | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( :A0 , :A1 , :A2 , :A3 , :A4 ) AND "myid" = :A5|
| 2|mydbtable |OPEN   |   | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) AND "myid" = 72 |
| 2.536|mydbtable |FETCH |    0| 1403|   |
| 3|mydbtable |REOPEN |   | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ) AND "myid" = 72 |
| 118|mydbtable |FETCH | 0| |
| 2|mydbtable |REOPEN | | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ) AND "myid" = 72     |
| 3|mydbtable |REOPEN | | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 ) AND "myid" = 72 |
| 94|mydbtable |FETCH | 0| 1403|   |
| 2|mydbtable |REOPEN |   | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 ) AND "myid" = 72 |
You see the IN list contained 5 entries each , wich made up about 97 statements for all 484 entries.
For every statment you have a single fetch operation wich means a separate access to the database.
If you would replace the FAE with a join you would only have one fetch to the database.
With the example above we can derive these observations:
1. From database point of view these settings kill performance when you access a big table and/or have a lot of entries or columns in your FAE_itab. Furthermore, you hide information what data you will access
at all and thus you block the database from creating a more efficient execution plan because it DOESN'T KNOW wich data you will select in the next step. I.e. it may be more efficient to scan the table in one shot instead of having many index accesses - but the database can make this decision only if it can examine ONE statement that has ALL the information of what data to retrieve.
2. A second impact is that with every statement execution you trigger the allocation of database resources
wich will contribute to the overhead described above.
Said that, FAE can never be a replacement for joining big tables (think of having a table with thousands of records in a FAE table )
Edited by: kishan P on Nov 2, 2010 2:16 PM - Format Fixed

Pull out Report for all configured Collection veriables in SCCM 20007

Hi All,
I have tried many ways but failed to pull out a report on collection veraiables.
It would be great, if someone could suggest how to pull out a report for all collection veriables which are configured.
Thanks
Regards, Dan

Hi,
Check if this link helps :
http://it.peikkoluola.net/2013/09/30/display-a-sccm-collection-variable-and-its-value/
~ Räjeésh M | Blog:
ScorpITs | Please remember to 'Mark as Answer' or 'Vote as Helpful' on the post that helps. It helps others reading the thread and recognizes useful contributions.

Report for viewing credit limit block released documents

Hello All,
Our client's requirement- credit limit check to be carried out and authorised persons can release the blocked orders.
But is there any report at month end to see how many documents were released and who released them Is there any standard report for viewing these or ABAP has to develop them? VKM2 transaction- released SD Documents would not show any released documents once billing is done i.e, once the sales documents is released it cannot be known who released it and when, how to track this?. so what can be the solution for this? Please suggest
Regards,
RAJ

Dear Raja,
Use VKM4 t code.
You can see both credit released sales orders and deliveries.
Put Overall credit status as D.
You can see how much value was released, when it was released. But with which user id it was released you cant see it.
Regards
Abhilash

Report for all Credit / Debit Notes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for