Report-wrong o/p

hi all, in the code below am getting a wrong o/p that o/p values are repeated,kindly check n plz help me...
loop at it_docu where awtyp = 'BKPF'.
select AUGBL
             INTO TABLE IT1
               from bseg
               where   bukrs = '1000'
                   and belnr = it_docu-docnr
                   and gjahr = it_docu-ac_gjahr.
endloop.
delete adjacent duplicates from it1 comparing augbl.
loop at IT1.
write :/ it1-augbl.
endloop.
every helpfull answers will be rewarded

Hello Sreejith,
     As you have written the codes it may give the output incorrect and also the runtime will be high.
     Firstly if you have declared the tables it_docu and it1 wit header line or with occurs statement then remove that and declare them simply.
     Then declare the datas below first.
TABLES: bseg.
DATA: wa_docu LIKE LINE OF it_docu,
            wa1      LIKE LINE OF it1.
Then at the place of the code what you have written replace the following code-
*LOOP AT it_docu INTO wa_docu *
                           WHERE wa_docu-awtyp = 'BKPF'.
     READ TABLE bseg WITH KEY
                                           bukrs = '1000'
                                           belnr = wa_docu-docnr
                                           gjahr = wa_docu-ac_gjahr.
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
               wa1-augbl = bseg-augbl.
               APPEND wa1 TO it1.
               CLEAR wa1.
      ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
SORT it1.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM it1
                                                    COMPARING augbl.
LOOP AT it1 INTO wa1.
           WRITE :/ wa1-augbl.
ENDLOOP.
Edited by: GAURAV SINGH on May 20, 2008 1:20 PM

Similar Messages

  • Add on XL reporter : Wrong executable digital signature for Add on

    Hi Experts,
    I have a client who gets this error 'Add on XL reporter : Wrong executable digital signature for Add on' when they try to login. They are on 2007A PL45. This happens on the server as well as on clients. Uninstalll and reinstall of client didn't work.  We had a look at the AddonLocalRegistration folder to see if XL reporter is registered but can't see any.
    I have found a similar link in the forum but that says about 2005b.
    Any help will be appreciated.
    regards
    Johnson

    Sir,
    Please do the following steps :
    1. Please go to the SBO-COMMON database, find table SARI, you will get
    the data entry for your Addon. Please check the value of field
    "AddOnChk". This is the digital signature of Addon executable file.
    2. Then go to installer package of the Addon, open the ard file
    (XLReporter.ard) with notepad then check the value of "addonsig".
    3. Compare these two values, if they are different, please overwrite
    "AddOnChk" field in database with the value of "addonsig" in ard file.
    and then try to start the addon again.
    4. If there are the same, the ard file or the executable file has been
    corrupted. I would like to suggest you remove the installer package
    from your machine, and download a fresh installer of Addon from SAP
    Service Marketplace. After that, please follow the steps as per the
    attached note ( Note no. 819501 ) to make your machine clean and
    then install the addon again.
    Regards,
    AVTAR SINGH

  • Apple logged my report wrong what should i do

    Apple logged my report wrong wot should i do

    Well my headphone input wont work so i told them over the internet on their website but they logged it as the phone not powering off and i dont know what to do as i cannot email apple or change my report

  • Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown

    Hi all,
    using SAP FF rel. 5.2 - VIRSANH 520_620 I encountered the same issues
    described in notes n°:
    - 1064911 Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown
    - 1152284 Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown with
    dates
    The solutions described in these notes are not valid for my SAP
    release:
    VIRSANH 520_620
    Does someone know if are available the same corrections for my SAP FF Rel.?
    Thanks in advance,
    Claudio Orsi

    Hi Claudio,
    Not sure if this helps any....
    We recently upgraded FF 5.2 (520_620) to current SP levels and experienced some issues with the reporting feature
    We utilize the reports through the NetWeaver interface and were not receiving correct results; this happened after we went from SP 3 to SP 4
    We have backed out the SP4 level to get back to "what was working"; we have an issue opened with SAP and they have identified our experience as a bug and plan on a fix with the next release scheduled for end of June
    Are you experiencing report issues using the NetWeaver interface or the backend report tools? What is the SP level you are at?
    This information on our experience may or may not be helpfull but anything can be of some value as long as it is mentioned
    Jerry Synoga
    Ryerson, Inc.
    630-758-2021

  • Finder reports wrong amount of free space

    Finder is reporting the wrong amount of free space on all my drives.  It's not from time machine local backups, because I've disabled those.  In fact, it's reporting MORE free space than there should be!  In all cases, Disk Utility shows the correct amount.  (So does the Terminal command df.)
    eg:
    external 120GB hard drive (USB) - finder says 137.83GB free (more than the drive can hold, nice) - disk util says 70 used 49.9 free... better
    external 1TB (firewire) - finder says 276.66GB free - disk util says 783.72 used 216.15 free
    internal 120GB SSD - finder says 108.32GB - disk util says 78.6GB used, 40.5 free
    Anyway to fix Finder?

    I noticed the same problem. I assumed it was from Time Machine's local backups (which exactly account for the space discrepancy between Finder and Disk Utility on my machine). But, as you say, you've disabled Time Machine local "snapshots." I can only assume you deleted the local backups (to free up the space they were using), emptied your Trash and are still showing the discrepancy.

  • 333Mhz IMac reporting wrong RAM

    Hello,
    I have a purple (grape? blueberry?) 333Mhz iMac running Panther and 9.2.2. I mainly use it as a jukebox, but I have been toying with it lately, and thought about upgrading the memory. It had two 128Mb sticks. I bought two 256Mb sticks very cheap, and did the swap.
    Now the iMac is definitely snappier, but it still reports two 128Mb sticks under both operating systems. What's wrong with this picture?
    I also found that the motherboard says Rev.A, although it should be Rev.D. Could it be a revision A updated with a revision D processor?
    Any feedback on this will be appreciated.
    Peace.

    You can put a 333 MHz CPU card on a Rev. A motherboard. The Rev. A and B motherboards also have the mezzanine slot on the back side that were removed with the Rev. C and D, so that's one way to visually check. Also, the Rev. A had ATI Rage IIc. The later ones had ATI Rage Pro or ATI Rage Pro Turbo. The Rev. A only had 2mb of VRAM, but that is upgradable to 6mb like the later tray-loader iMacs.
    I've heard some tray-loaders will only recognize 128mb of RAM in each slot. Apple only specified up to 128mb in each slot, but they can usually see 256mb each. Mine sees 256mb in each slot.

  • Sales reports Wrong for oct 13th

    Hey guys. I am 100% sure the sales reports i got via itunes connect for october 13th are incorrect.
    I say this because my app "Angry Dogs - Draw!" went live on the 13th, and has sat at #3 in the Adventure > Release Date category ever since. Due to this good position you would expect a few hundred sales. However itunes reckons i only sold 1 unit on the 13th.
    I know it is wrong because it says the unit was sold in USA when i know for a fact that one was sold in Australia too. My mate bought it, he has a australian itunes account and bought it as soon as it was released.
    If the report is wrong, will the corrections be amended to tomorrows report? Or is it impossible for these reports to be incorrect?
    Please respond as im pulling my hair out over this

    We're all just your fellow users here. With rare exceptions, no one here works for Apple, and those few Apple employees who do participate do so on their own time and can't respond to questions like yours. You need to contact the iTunes Store through your developer account with them and ask about this issue.
    Regards.

  • CA reporting wrong DOFD---UPDATE

    I have been trying to figure out why this debt wasn't due to fall off my report until next year when I stopped paying the OC in May 2008, and today I called EX and they told me the DOFD was 6/2009 which is WRONG. She initiated a dispute for me stating that my DOFD should be 6/2008. They are adding an entire year to my debt reporting. My question is, what if the dispute doesn't work? Where do I go from here? The CA is Calvary Portfolio and the OC is Citifinancial for a personal loan I took out in late 2007. Would Citifinancial still have my payment records from 7 years ago? Should I call them?  Onto a bit of good news, I got an old collection off my report today when I called! My report from March said a baddie was to fall off 5/2015 but was still on my report, the CRA said it wasn't to fall off till September according to her records, but she removed it today for me     

    The bible on the procedure that the debt collector must follow in obtaining and reporting the DOFD is set forth in FCRA 623(a)(5). It is a multi-step process that requires the debt collector to obtain and report the DOFD no later than 90 days after reporting their collection.The DOFD occured under the OC account, and thus section 623(a)(5) sets forth steps to obtain that date from the OC. The first step permits them to "obtain" the DOFD from any prior credit reporting that was made by the OC of their determiantion of the DOFD.If the OC previously reported the DOFD, the debt collector can simply assume that date is correct, and report that date without any need to contact the OC. The second step applies when the OC has not placed of record in the consumer's file their determination of the DOFD on their account.In that situation,the debt collector is required to contact the OC and make reasonable atetmpts to obtain the DOFD from them.Howeer, the OC is not obligated to respond to the debt collector. If the debt collector has made reasonable attempts to obtain the DOFD from the OC and were unsucessful, as is apparently the case in the posted scenario,then then they must still report a DOFD, so the FCRA fallback provision is that the debt collector can then make their best guess as to the DOFD, but in no case can they report a DOFD that was later than the date they obtained their collection authority, such as by purchase of the debt.Section 623(a)(5) thus clearly deals with the situation where the OC does not or cannot provide a firm DOFD. It appears that the best info obtainable from the OC is that they charged-off the debt in 12/2009.That, by definition, requires that the DOFD mustt have preceded that date.Thus, the debt collector would be able to legitimately make their best determination provided that their determiation is no laater than either the date of the CO or the date they received their collection authority.  

  • Availability "SLA" report - wrong "Planned Maintance" for some servers

    Just wondering if anybody knows of any bugs or perhaps what I am doing “wrong” here when I have created an availability “SLA” report
    The report is the generic, availability and tagets a large group (1000) of SCOM health service watchers . Under downtime I am checking the options for “Planned Maintenance” and “Unplanned Maitenance”. When I run the report most seem correct – I spot
    servers I know have been down and small amount of planned downtime for patching. However I
     have bunch of servers (mabe 20) that all show pretty much 100% planned maintenance and all with the same odd uptime of say 4 hours exactly. I cant find anything common with these servers. I even removed the SCOM agent from one server, left
    a litte while and re-installed and this still shows up in this fashion. Any ideas?
    I am running SCOM2012 SP1 CU4
    Many thanks

    Hi,
    It seems like that there are cache data for the agent, what is the result when we use report tasks under monitoring console for that specific server?
    If the issue still there, then I would like to suggest you refer to the below blog, and follow the article to re-install the agent:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2009/10/01/fixing-troubled-agents.aspx
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    Regards, Yan Li

  • XL Reporter Wrong executable digital signature error on one workstation

    Hi,
    Im getting this error on 1 of our client's worstations.
    They have SAPB1 2005A.
    XL reporter works on all other workstations except for one.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks!

    Hai!
    Check these threads
    Re: Wrong digital signature for add-on installer
    error : "Wrong Digital Signature for Addon Installer"
    Error:Wrong Executable Digital Signature for Add on.
    Register Add-on

  • Bios reporting wrong value memory

    I am still running on my old AMD Athlon XP 1800+ on MS-6330 Motherboard.
    I have 3 RAM slots: 512kb, 128kb, 512kb. (max allowed 1.5gb).
    I have S.I.W. (Systems Information for Windows) installed that reports this as correct. However, since reinstalling XP following a drive failure, S.I.W. now reports that BIOS is reporting the wrong value; i.e. total 512kb only.
    My question is; Is this a hiccup in BIOS or SIW?
    Has anyone had a similar experience please?

    how much the bios counts during bios post?
    Quote
    i.e. total 512kb only.
    kb

  • Finder reports wrong sizes

    The size column in finder frequently reports sizes of folders wrongly as does get info. I have a whole series of folders showing 208K when there are 10-80 37Mb files inside. I can open the folder and see that all the files are there and have the right sizes, but the folder still reports 208K. If I alter the label colour, it will update the sizes, but this is very tedious!
    Any way to persuade finder to calculate sizes properly?

    all sorted now

  • Project cash management Reporting; wrong value in RPSCO table

    Hi,
    I have a problem.
    I have activate the Project cash management.
    I have run the transaction OPH1 for delection Actual DATA.
    I have run the transaction OPH4 for reconstruction actual data for purchase orders.
    Ihave run the transaction CJEN for reconstruction info database.
    The customizing for the value category is green.
    In  the report S_ALR_87013573, we display always wrong value , tough line items (CJIA ) is blank.
    We have run again the transaction OPH1 for delection Actual DATA, but we display the worng value in the table RPSCO. .
    Kindly suggest me the solution.
    Best Regards
    Federica

    hi,
    execute the below reports in se38 and after that run cjbn,cjen
    RKACOR19-Reconcile between line items and totals records
    RKPEP010-Display Project Actual Payment Line Items
    regards,

  • DVDSP reports wrong image size?

    If I drop a DV-rez clip into DVDSP, then check that clips attributes in the Video Asset browser, it reports it as ~5.8Mb/s and 720x480. But if I drop an Uncompressed SD file into DVDSP - a clip which is recognized by both FCP and the Finder as being 720x486 and Uncompressed 8-bit SD NTSC - it too comes up as ~5.8Mb/s and 720x480. Which is completely wrong. Or am I crazy?
    DVDSP 4.1.1.

    Ray,
    I think I understand what you are trying.
    When you start with the image showing 6" rather than 8", I take it you are reading off the rulers on the left and top. Are you sure that there isn't a scroll bar on the right of the picture to move the image to show the bottom 2"? Try using Ctrl & 0 to fit the image to the window.
    Do you work with images in floating windows?
    The way I would get a 2" border at the bottom is to use Image - Resize Canvas Size and use relative changes.
    Add the 2" height and make sure the anchor point is moved up.
    Hope that might help
    Brian

  • How can I report wrong song information, the contact form doesn't work

    There used to be a contact form to report broken song information but I can't seem to find it.From herehttps://support.spotify.com/uk/learn-more/faq/#!/article/how-do-I-report-a-content-error-on-spotify/I click on the let us know here linkhttp://www.spotify.com/about-us/contact/contact-spotify-account/On the new page I click on Technical issuesThen I want to report a broken song or wrong track informationhttps://support.spotify.com/uk/contact-spotify-anonymous/#Then the link How do I report broken tracks or albumsWhich links me back to the starthttps://support.spotify.com/learn-more/faq/#!/article/how-do-I-report-a-content-error-on-spotify/Where's it gone?

    Hello:
    What about going here to this link: https://support.spotify.com/uk/contact-spotify-anonymous/
    click on the green bubble that says I STILL NEED HELP, does that give you input boxes to input information into by reporting track problems and issues? You might have to do this for each song and/or album you find problems with one at a time though.

  • X1 reports "wrong AC adapter"

    Hello community,rather strange thing going on with my beloved X1C (1st gen., Product 34602SG, BIOS G6ETA3WW (2.63)):All of a sudden, the system reports that a "wrong AC adapter" is connected and that this adapter might not provide enough power for the device. As a result, the battery won't charge any more. However, I am using the standard 90w adapter that came with it. I also get the error message with the travel adapter (41R4510).Two weeks ago I went to my local Lenovo service partner, who sold me another brandnew AC adpater (45N0238), but the problem persists.In order to charge the battery, I have to shut the system down and disconnect and reconnect the adapter until the LED tells me the battery is charging, which normally takes a few attempts and requires patience which I don't always have...Is anyone here familiar with this issue and knows how to solve it?Cheerslimbonic  

    Hi I am having the same problem. I am travelling and had forgot my original charger so I tried using another charger when this problem started. Now even with my original charger is still shows me that I am using incorrect adapter and it only charges when shut down. Can someone please help with a solution?

Maybe you are looking for

  • MBAM bitlocker-protected removable drives recovery keys saved on sql database not active directory

    Hi Guys I need help in saving bitlocker protected removable drives on the sql database instead of active directory . I have tried to play around with the policy and I am not winning , currently my GPO : Choose how bitlocker-protected removable drives

  • MBP endurance

    I couldn't think of a better title, sorry 1. I use my MBP as my main laptop and it is always sitting on my desk (I'm a college kid). So, it is always plugged into AC (when working on it or in sleep mode, all the time). Is this good or bad? 2. Also, I

  • Preventing third parties from using the TouchUp Text Tool on generated documents

    While perusing the options of Adobe Acrobat at work I had the good fortune of finding the TouchUp Text Tool. Now I am trying find a relatively simple solution in order prevent third parties from using this same tool to easily modify pdfs we create fr

  • SAP general Idea. Please correct me

    Dear All, I heard that MsSAP is a business suit of SAP AG. This ERP package has 5 enterprise applications 1. ECC 2. CRM 3. SCM 4. SRM 5. PLM I think HR and FICO comes under ECC. Then what about other modules? Like MM, SD, PP, PS ETC And BI/BW, BASIS,

  • Embed src issue / Div moving

    Alright, two problems here. My website is at http://www.theepicenter.org/pagetemp.htm. First: I did a check on my code at validator.w3.org. It keeps telling me that there are errors on Line 113 with the <embed> element (this is the "destination finde