Request must still be Approved - ChaRM

Hi all,
I am unit testing ChaRM and I am getting an error when I try to bring the changes into production.
Error
Transport control program tp ended with error code 0250
Message no. XT200
Diagnosis
An error occurred when executing a tp command.
Command: IMPORT ALL SMD clires100 proj=SOME pf=/usr/sap/tra
Return code: 0250
Error text: inactive entries found in buffer
Request: ALL
System Response
The function terminates.
Procedure
Correct the error and execute the command again if necessary.
Cause:
In STMS the transports for my Normal Correction and Test Message have a icon that says "Request must still be Appoved".
My Normal Correction's status is Tested Successfully.
I used a Test Message to fix a problem with the Normal Correction and its status is Confirmed
The Maintenance Cycyle's status is Go-live.
What am I doing wrong?
regards,
Jason

Hi Jason,
just to make sure: Have you set your Transport Strategy to "Single transports" without any QA Workflow? (Check in STMS -> Transport Routes -> double click on Domain Controller)
Regards,
Marco

Similar Messages

I have been requested the certificate for iOS development since 4 days ago, but the result is still pending approval. So how many days should i wait?

i have been requested the certificate for IOS Development since 4 days ago, but the result is still pending approval. So how many days should i wait?

1. You did not get an error message telling you that your iPhoto library was getting full. You got a message telling you that your HD was getting full, right?
OS X needs about 10 gigs of hard drive space for normal OS operations - things like virtual memory, temporary files and so on.
Without this space your Mac will slow down as the OS hunts for space on the disk, files will be fragmented, also slowing things down, apps will crash and the risk of data corruption - that is damage to your files, photos, music - increases exponentially.
Your first priority is to make more space on that HD. Nothing else can be done until you do.
Purchase an external HD and move your Photos and Music to it. Both iPhoto and iTunes can run perfectly well with the Library on an external disk.
Your Library has been damaged from being run on an overfull disk.
How much free space on it now?

XT278 Transport files for request &1 must still be transferred

Hi,
I´ve configured the transport routes between my DEV and PRD systems. But I´m getting the next message when I´m trying to import the request into the PRD system:
XT278 Transport files for request &1 must still be transferred
I´ve read that this success because each system has own transport group (
hostsapmnt rans).
I´ve put the PRD on the same transport group that DES but I´m getting a error while i tried to import a request.
What can i do? I want to avoid that every time what a request it will imported I want not to do QUEUE>VERIFY or Click in the green arrow.
More thanks

>> If I change the Transport group, Is it enough?
No
>> Or I must to change the DIR_TRANS parameter in the system?
Yes
>> The remained folders in, out will be afected? If I need to import support packages in one system and this have the DIR_TRANS pointed to the dir_trans of the DEV system, It will be affected?
Yes and No, both. But you would be in advantage that you will be 'able' to use the 'same' support package 'files' all throughout the landscape - Instead of copying the SPs/files separately for 'each' system's EPS/in
Thanks

"Transport Message - Data file must still be transferred"

Hello All,
I am having 2 System landscape for ECC 6.0.Dev & PRD.I have released the Transport Request from se09 of DEV but when it is goint to PRD,Transport Request is coming with the caption"Data file must still be transferred"Why is this message coming??How to resolve it??I am using AIX 5.2 & Oracle 10.2.

Hi Ashely,
It is not an error , it is due to your are using multiple transport directory i.e it mean you are using seperate trans directory for DEV and for PRD.
Both the system has its on trans directory.
If you don't want that message then you have to use coman trans directory for DEV and PRD.
in other words you have seperate transport group for dev and seperate transport group for quality.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/06/ea457a12a711d3b46f006094b9ea64/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/44/b4a1847acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/content.htm
Thanks
Anil

STMS -- data file must still be transferred

Hello All,
In our SAP ERP landscape we have configured the transport system, but in QAS and PRD the systems's queue shows status "data file must still be transferred" and a green twisted arrow icon for new transport requests in the queue. We can transfer the data files manually but we want to know if exist any possibility to schedule a job to do the transfer automatically.
Thanks,
HEPC

Hi,
Message "Data file must still be transferred" usually comes up when
there is no shared transport directory. The adjustment will copy the
transports to the local transport directory.
Please push the 'Adjust Import Queue' button on the top left
of the Import Queue screen (= button with green arrow)
Thank You.
Regards,
Deepika

How to change the requested delivery date when approval has been done

Hi
We use SRM5.0 and we want to implement SC, now we want to make it possible to change the delivery date in the shopping cart when we approve.
This is needed if we request today but the approver didn't approve same day, therefore the requested day has to move the same number of days, that the approver has spend. Or else the deliver date will not be correct.
Do any of you know how to do this??
Best regards
Jakob

Hi Jakob,
What scenario do you use? Classic, Extended Classic, Standalone?
So depending on your scenario you can have differente types of follow-on documents (PR/PO only in ERP in case of Classic, or PO in SRMand ERP in case of Extended Classic).
Do you use Sourcing Cockpit?
I've tested this scenario in SRM 7.0 Standalone and if the follow-on document (in my case, a PO) is not "Ordered" yet then I can change the SC. But if it is already "Ordered", I can't change the SC. This is standard behavior.
You could use Sourcing Cocking to solve this issue, in this you don't use it yet.
Best regards,
Christian Zeuch

Network message format error. GET request must have a QUERY_STRING value

I have installed new Content Server 10gR on my laptop.
Web Server is : Apache 2.2.4
DB is : Oracle 10g (Standard Edition)
Platform : Windows
CS is up & running. I am able to login and browse through content store. But when I try to perform any type of Submit operation anywhere in CS Portal ( for example "Updating My Profile and clicking on Submit" ) I get following error:
"Network message format error. GET request must have a QUERY_STRING value (the CGI parameters on the URL) "
1. Does any one know why I am getting this ?
2. Is some configuration missing for Apache which connects Apache with CS ?
Below is the httpd.conf changes:
LoadModule IdcApacheAuth D:/oracle/ucm/idc/shared/os/win32/lib/IdcApache22Auth.dll
IdcUserDB idc "D:/oracle/ucm/idc/data/users/userdb.txt"
Alias /idc "D:/oracle/ucm/idc/weblayout"
<Location /idc>
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
DirectoryIndex portal.htm
IdcSecurity idc
</Location>
3. One things that I see that before hitting the Submit button the URL is:
http://delrpatha76669.sapient.com:8989/idc/idcplg/?IdcService=GET_DOC_PAGE&Action=GetTemplatePage&Page=HOME_PAGE&Auth=Internet
And after hitting Submit button on "My Profile" the URL becomes:
http://delrpatha76669.sapient.com:8989/idc/idcplg/
I guess part of URL gets truncated/missed etc and so we are getting this error ?
Any way to fix this ?
Edited by: user12188052 on Sep 21, 2010 10:10 AM

This issue is resolved.
Cause
- After installation when I started CS , I saw "D:\oracle\ucm\idc\weblayout\idcplg" folder missing error in logs. Reason why I created this "idcplg" folder inside "weblayout" folder was because I thought it was not created during installation. I created this folder & copied "idc_cgi_isapi.dll" this file into it.. This was the issue
Fix
- I deleted the folder "D:\oracle\ucm\idc\weblayout\idcplg" and everything started working fine now.

SharePoint 2010, Contributor Permission still can Approve and Publish docs/pages...

My department has created a new Web Publishing Unit. All "Publishers" use to have approve rights; they changed from Approvers to Contributors. I still have some (now) Contributors that still get the "Approve and Publish" buttons
that allows them to approve and publish their docs and/or web pages. I have reviewed all SharePoint Groups to make sure they were not in one of the other groups and they are not. How can I fix this so that all Contributors can only "view,
add, update, and delete" list items and documents? Thanks, Mija-Linda

Hi Mija Linda,
Have you checked contributor group's permission level, I think that group might still have approver (Design) permission, if so, then it would be better to modify the group permission.
the best thing is to create a permission level and assign users to it.
Let us know your finding, so that we can suggest an alternate.
Hope this helps!
Ram - SharePoint Architect
Blog - SharePointDeveloper.in
Please vote or mark your question answered, if my reply helps you

Appropriation Request(IMAK-POSNR) is 'Approved' or not?

How can we know that the System Status(RAIA1-SYSST1) of an Appropriation Request(IMAK-POSNR) is 'Approved' or not? I mean in what table I can found this or if you can give the name of a functional module that will be also great.

to change the status by user, he can modify the hours in the application and resubmit
For administrator purposes, you should cats_appr_lite, you can reject the all time and do it,
Do not make any changes directly to CATSDB< it might cause inconsistency
So better use standard transaction like cats_appr_lite or cats_da

Action fo Request Type 21: Role Approval.

Hello All,
Can anyone please share what would be the Actions associated with the Request Type 21: Role Approval? I seached a lot in BRM dosuments but its not mentioned anywhere.
The tasks that I would like to do from this is the changesor creation for the roles should go through an approval process.
Thankyou.

Hello Sudesh,
Thank you for your reply. My question however is that for BRM request for triggering a mail when the role approval is requested(for which I assume I have to activate the request type "Role Approval"), which is the corresponding Action type. My intension is not to create a user when it does not exist or not, but to create a request when the role is changed or created. My emials are getting triggered for other request types, but not only for BRM.
Thank you!

UWL - Leave Request item still in UWL after approval

Hello,
we are facing the problem that the leave request items have still state "new" after the approval and don't change the state.
But in the list the leave request is not visible any more... so the approval worked.
I found the discussion: Approved items in UWL remains in the status "new". and Leave request workitem in UWL status update issue but that didn't help.
Does someone know what to do?
thanks, Vanessa

Hello Lukas,
with the help of the wiki: http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/UWLworkitemisnotrefreshedafteraLeaveRequesthasbeen+approved I was able to find the required note to get the status fixed. It is now completed and that's great. Unfortunately the items are still there. I am only able to see the new items in the transaction. The old ones are not visible but I need to delete them. Tomorrow I will ask some WF guru to help me fix it.
I also think that there is still a problem with the configuration of the UWL / backend WF. It could be that ne required jobs are not planned. I was happy that the UWL worked so fast but now....
Greetings,
Vanessa

HCM ESS Leave request : Intimation mail or Approval mail is not going

Dear Experts,
We have an Ep 7.0 system with ECC 6.0 is connected at backend. Currently we have a requirement : whenever an employee will request for a leave from ESS(EP 7.0) the approver should get an intimation mail and similarly when the request is apporved or rejected the requestor should get a mail about this.
Now we have already a customize workflow for this leave request process. We have checked and scheduled background work procesess for the following reports
1. RPTARQEMAIL
2. RPTARQPOST
3. RSWWTHEX
4. RSWWERRE
5. RSWWCLEAR
6. RSWWCOND
Please note that an approval mail is being sent to the applicant after approval of his leave. We need to make the following adjustments:
1. The body of the approval mail that is being sent now needs to be changed and must include details of the leave request. How to do this?
2. No intimation mail is being sent to approver after a leave request has been raised. As per RPTARQEMAIL approver should also get notified about the leave request.
3. Apart from RPTARQEMAIL if we use the work item "SEND MAIL" in the workflow to implement this, we are getting the approval mail and notification mail in the inbox of our business workspace(SBWP). However the mail is not being redirected to the mail id maintained i.e in outlook inbox.
Regards
Partha

My sincere advise is to do some thing like this,
1. First take a copy of the standard leave workflow template WS12300111
2.Create a ZBOR (in SWO1 txn) in which you define a method which handles mail sending process by using the standard SAP FM SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1
3. Create a Text element in SO10 transaction.After this as I said you will creating a ZBOR-method in that itself you determine the agents and email addresses before calling the FM
SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1.
4. To get the lines of the mail content (from SO10) you hvae to use the FM READ_TEXT
if the above is done then fixing your issues is a simple thing
Q1. You need to change the content of the mail type.
A1. You can chage the mail content in the TExt element.
Q2.No intimation mail is being sent to approver after a leave request has been raised?
A2. You hvae two options over here either you can make use of the tab notification of the decision step or by using the program RSWUWFML2 you can schedule a background job, for help see the Documentation of the rep.
Q3.Mail Sedning to outlook
A3. SCOT settings, SMTP---> Internet ---> addresses ---> maintain the address or by using the SWNCONFIG you can even aceheive this.

Change Request TAB Missing in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN - CHARM

Hi All,
We are in process of configuring Chage Request Management(Charm).we created a maintenance project and added the ogical component.but unable to activate charm. because the CHANGE REQUEST TAB is missing.
We have followed the steps in SPRO and also followed the NOTE : 903527 except importing the picelist attached but still unable to see the TAB. Our SOlution Manager is at EHP1 sps 2
Reddy

Hi
Have you activated this bc set and performed in the initial basic settings in SPRO.
SOLMAN40_CHARM_BASICFUNC_001
check this blog
/people/dolores.correa/blog/2008/07/26/first-steps-to-work-with-change-request-management-scenario
Regards
Prakhar

In Family sharing why kids must have mine approve to for free downloads (for purchases i understood)

This is crazy that i set age in restriction so they can only download for example 4+ ...but even then when whey select free app they must ask me for agree ? Its stupid ! Or for what we have restriction setting for apps ?

It's nothing to do with app restrictions, a free app is still considered a purchase and requires approval if you enable the Ask for Approval feature on a family member. I was hoping for an easy to way to say "Yes, I will buy you that game..," not a constant annoyance of having to approve every free game they download. I would love to take advantage of the other features of Family Sharing but this problem actually blocks it. I have to remove them from the iCloud family or else they are essentially restricted from downloading free apps.

How to create a view for all Service Requests that are not approved by reviewer

Hallo,
I want to create a view in the Service Requests library that shows all SRs that are not approved. How to configure condition that says: if a SR has related Review Activity which is In Progress, show that SRs?
I couldn't find this when creating the view. Thank you.

So here's the first problem with that: Which review activity? a SR can contain multiple RAs, so how do we decide if an arbitrary SR is approved or not?
As to the specific language you use (Any child RA is In Progress) you might want to look at the criteria from the default Change approval view, which does something similar:
<QueryCriteria Adapter="omsdk://Adapters/Criteria" xmlns="http://tempuri.org/Criteria.xsd">
<Criteria>
<FreeformCriteria>
<Freeform>
<Criteria xmlns="http://Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Core.Criteria/">
<Expression>
<And>
<Expression>
<SimpleExpression>
<ValueExpressionLeft>
<Property>$Context/Path[Relationship='CoreActivity!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' TypeConstraint='CoreActivity!System.WorkItem.Activity.ReviewActivity']/Property[Type='CoreActivity!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Status$</Property>
</ValueExpressionLeft>
<Operator>Equal</Operator>
<ValueExpressionRight>
<Value>$MPElement[Name="CoreActivity!ActivityStatusEnum.Active"]$</Value>
</ValueExpressionRight>
</SimpleExpression>
</Expression>
<Expression>
<SimpleExpression>
<ValueExpressionLeft>
<Property>$Context/Property[Type='CoreChange!System.WorkItem.ChangeRequest']/Status$</Property>
</ValueExpressionLeft>
<Operator>Equal</Operator>
<ValueExpressionRight>
<Value>$MPElement[Name="CoreChange!ChangeStatusEnum.InProgress"]$</Value>
</ValueExpressionRight>
</SimpleExpression>
</Expression>
</And>
</Expression>
</Criteria>
</Freeform>
</FreeformCriteria>
</Criteria>
</QueryCriteria>
This is a simple AND criteria with two componets. one looking for a Review Activity (TypeConstraint='CoreActivity!System.WorkItem.Activity.ReviewActivity') which is related to the targetting CR by Contains Activity ($Context/Path[Relationship='CoreActivity!System.WorkItemContainsActivity';
Context in this... context means the CR targeted by the view) where it's status (/Property[Type='CoreActivity!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Status$) is In Progress ($MPElement[Name="CoreActivity!ActivityStatusEnum.Active"]$). The other is filtering
for the target change request's status ( $Context/Property[Type='CoreChange!System.WorkItem.ChangeRequest']/Status$) is In Progress ($MPElement[Name="CoreChange!ChangeStatusEnum.InProgress"]$).
You could convert the second criteria to point to SRs and SR status values, and then use the similar text for the first criteria. i'd recommend
Anton's Advanced View Editor (or
the free version) to do the criteria adjustment.

Request must still be Approved - ChaRM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for