Required Checkboxs

I am new, please be patient with me.  I have a form and I want my question to be required.  The choices for the answer are "None" or 1 or more of 5 other choices.  If they choose 1 or more of the 5 choices, I want the "None" to be unchecked and if they choose "None", I want the others to be unchecked.  But the whole question I want to be required.  What is the code to do this with?
I'm not sure I'm in the right forum or not.  I'm using Dreamweaver CS4 for Mac and I don't know how to use it yet.  This is my first encounter with "Spry".

<!DOCTYPE html><html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<script>
function noneChecker() {
  if(document.myForm.cb1.checked==false) {
    document.myForm.cb2.disabled=false;
    document.myForm.cb3.disabled=false;
    document.myForm.cb4.disabled=false;
    document.myForm.cb5.disabled=false;
    document.myForm.cb6.disabled=false;
    document.myForm.submitMyForm.disabled=true;
  } else {
    document.myForm.cb2.disabled=true;
    document.myForm.cb3.disabled=true;
    document.myForm.cb4.disabled=true;
    document.myForm.cb5.disabled=true;
    document.myForm.cb6.disabled=true;
    document.myForm.submitMyForm.disabled=false;
function minChecker() {
    if(document.myForm.cb2.checked==false && document.myForm.cb3.checked==false && document.myForm.cb4.checked==false && document.myForm.cb5.checked==false && document.myForm.cb6.checked==false) {
        document.myForm.cb1.disabled=false;
        document.myForm.submitMyForm.disabled=true;
    } else {
        document.myForm.cb1.disabled=true;
        document.myForm.submitMyForm.disabled=false;
</script>
</head>
<body>
<form name="myForm" id="myForm" action="" method="post">
  <label for="cb1"> None
    <input name="cb1" id="cb1" type="checkbox" value="none" onclick="noneChecker()">
  </label>
  <label for="cb2"> 1
    <input name="cb2" id="cb2" type="checkbox" value="1" onclick="minChecker()">
  </label>
  <label for="cb3"> 2
    <input name="cb3" id="cb3" type="checkbox" value="2" onclick="minChecker()">
  </label>
  <label for="cb4"> 3
    <input name="cb4" id="cb4" type="checkbox" value="3" onclick="minChecker()">
  </label>
  <label for="cb5"> 4
    <input name="cb5" id="cb5" type="checkbox" value="4" onclick="minChecker()">
  </label>
  <label for="cb6"> 5
    <input name="cb6" id="cb6" type="checkbox" value="5" onclick="minChecker()">
  </label>
  <input name="submitMyForm" id="submitMyForm" type="submit" disabled>
</form>
</body>
</html>
Gramps

Similar Messages

  • How do you make a required checkbox field stop a form submitting if not checked.

    Hello,
    I have a form which needs people to accept two checkboxes before the form will submit upon clicking a button.
    I am using Acrobat X Pro.
    The form does not submit when a required text field is empty but when the checkboxes are empty it still tries to submit.
    How can I work around this?
    Thanks.

    You can't do it directly, but there's a work-around. Create a (hidden) text field and set it as required. As the text field's custom calculation script enter the following code:
    event.value = this.getField("Check Box1").value=="Off" ? "" : this.getField("Check Box1").value;
    This will prevent the document from being submitted if "Check Box1" is not ticked. The downside is that the check-box won't be highlighted in red when the validation fails, but at least the file won't be submitted partially filled-in.
    Alternatively, you can write you own validation script, which can provide a full report of which fields still need to be filled-in before submitting the file.

  • 'Required' checkboxes

    I have a multi-row form with each row containing a column of three checkboxes - "Yes" "No" and "N/A".  The submitter must check one of the appropriate boxes but I'm not sure how to do this. 
    I'm using X Pro.
    Thanks!

    Right-click one of the boxes using the Add New Field or Object Select Tool,
    select Rename Field and then tick the Require Field box.

  • I can't check "required" checkboxes in a datasource view.... the view is disabled.sad

    Scott Mitchell

    Hi Scott,
    You can try the steps below, and check whether it helps you.
    Clean and Rebuild - Cleaning and rebuilding your current Project (Right-click > Clean, Right-click Rebuild respective) and see if that makes any difference at all. 
    If these issues are still persisting after the above steps, try restarting Visual Studio (and even your local machine)
    If it still has same issue, you could look into relevant topic about "SQL Views Not Available in DataSource for HTML Client"
    Please let me know if there is anything that I can do to help.Best regards,
    Angie
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • How to make the Shipping address field on an Account as a required field?

    Hi,
    The requirement is that there has to be a shipping address specified for each Account that is being created.
    I tried to set the 'shipping' address field to 'required' in Account field setup, but the required checkbox is disabled, neither can I do it from Account Page layouts since there also its the same case.
    Does anyone know if its possible to do this and how?
    Regards,
    Ani.

    Have you tried to add validation to the AccountName field
    [<PrimaryShipToStreetAddress>] IS NOT NULL - will test to see if there is a value in the Shipping Address 1 field

  • Bind Variable : required - no message, not required - error

    hi
    Please consider the example application created using JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.0
    at http://www.consideringred.com/files/oracle/2012/RequiredOrNotBVarApp-v0.01.zip
    It has these View Objects defined
    - EmployeesReqNoValueBVarVO which has a required Bind Variable, and where clause "last_name like '%' || :LastNameBVar || '%'"
    - EmployeesNotReqNoValueBVarVO which has a NOT required Bind Variable, and where clause "(:LastNameBVar is null or last_name like '%' || :LastNameBVar || '%')"
    The Bind Variable in both View Objects does NOT have a value (no default value, not programmatically set, not entered by the user, ...).
    This "no value set" aspect could be the result of a "development error", but the resulting observed behaviour is at least "peculiar".
    - scenario (sc1) : run "try tryEmployeesReqNoValueBVarVO", see a table filled with rows and NO message about the required Bind Variable
    - scenario (sc2) : run "try tryEmployeesNotReqNoValueBVarVO", see "No data to display." in the table and the "Missing IN or OUT parameter at index:: 1" error for the NOT required Bind Variable for a where clause that can deal with null values
    - question (q1) How can be explained that scenario (sc1) does not result in an error message about the required Bind Variable (and scenario (sc2) does result in an error message about the NOT required Bind Variable)?
    - question (q2) What does the "Required" checkbox for a Bind Variable really mean for Bind Variables used in a where clause of a View Object?
    If the described behaviour can be reproduced (using RequiredOrNotBVarApp-v0.01.zip), confirmations are welcome.
    (Aspects of these scenario's could be related to forum thread "Bind variable required/not required: strange behaviour".)
    many thanks
    Jan Vervecken

    Thanks for your reply Frank.
    Frank Nimphius wrote:
    ... your query actually is dependent on the existence of the bind variable because the bind variable is used in the where clause part. ...Sure, and the Bind Variable does exist (in both (sc1) and (sc2)).
    ... This has nothing to do with whether the bind variable value is checked for NULL and if the value it contains is NULL performs an "all you can eat" type of query. Because the existing, NOT required Bind Variable has not been given a value in scenario (sc2), the check for NULL only makes more explicit that NULL is a valid value for the SQL statement.
    ... Non required bind variables are used in the context of view criteria to avoid missing IN or OUT parameters. ...The "Required" checkbox for a Bind Variable is also available/enabled when the Bind Variable is not used in a View Criteria (in both (sc1) and (sc2)).
    ... In the case of a view criteria, the VO query may be executed without the view criteria applied and for this reason should not fail only because the defined bind variable is not provided. ...No View Criteria in the scenario's (sc1) and (sc2) I descirbe.
    ... If you run the query in the tester, you get
    (java.sql.SQLException) Missing IN or OUT parameter at index:: 1
    and no query is executed at all for EmployeesNotReqNoValueBVarVOSure, that matches scenario (sc2), but the Bind Variable can be configured as NOT required, how can it be missing?
    The JDeveloper help page "Create or Edit Bind Variables Dialog - Variable Page" says:
    "... Alternatively, you can use the SQL Statement page of the Edit View Objects dialog to enter a parameterized WHERE clause. Note that the bind variables you enter in a parameterized SQL WHERE clause will require a valid value at runtime or a runtime exception error will be thrown. ..."
    So, null as a valid value, seems to explain the behaviour in scenario (sc1).
    "... In contrast, when you create a view criteria filter condition that references a named bind variable, you can specify whether the value is required or optional. ..."
    But, the "Required" checkbox is also available (to uncheck) for Bind Variables that are not used in a View Criteria.
    Specifically for the "Required" checkbox the help page says : "... Select if you want to make the value of a name bind variable required for any usage the references the named bind variable. For example, when the value is required (default), all view criteria items that reference the named bind variable will fail to execute unless a valid value is supplied at runtime. Alternatively, you can leave the value not required and use the Create View Criteria dialog to specify whether or not individual view criteria items require the value. ..."
    Again, the focus is on View Criteria, although it can also be unchecked (configuring as NOT Required) for Bind Variables that are not used in a View Criteria (which does not seem to be something you should do).
    But, still, there is a perspective here that makes this possibly very confusing:
    - a View Object where clause with a required Bind Variable, no value set --> results in rows, and NO message about a missing value
    - a View Object where clause with a NOT required Bind Variable, no value set --> results in no rows, and a message about a missing value
    regards
    Jan

  • Making the comments field Required in the Workitem

    Hello,
    I have a GP Application wherein the initiator fills out a form which goes to the Approver using Visual Approval Callable Object.........now when the approver opens the workitem he sees the information entered by the initiator and a comments field at the bottom......we want to make this field required for them.......how can we achieve this.....while creation of the Visual Approval Callable Object i see the comments as a output parameter with the 'Is Required' checkbox option....but it is disabled and does not allow you to select it......Please help...
    Any help would be highly appreciated...
    Regards,
    Anil

    Hi Anil,
    Standard Visual Approval CO doesnt work like that.
    Either you can create your own CO.
    OR
    i can suggest you as follows, but it is making little complicated process.
    1. Create one Action with Business Logic callable object, which will check for Comment EQ space or not and have 2 different states.
    a. If Comments is blank, Go back to Approval Action
    b. If Comments is entered, Proceed for further actions.
    2. Set this action as target for Approval Action.
    Hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Tejaswini

  • Updating checkboxes in an Access Database

    I have an edit form that requires checkboxes. I select a
    record to edit and check the checkboxes, enter the text data and
    submit the data. When I select the same record from the edit list I
    see where the text data is available in the form, but the
    checkboxes are back to the "default" unchecked.
    <cfoutput query="pubrec">
    <form action="update.cfm" method="post">
    <input type="hidden" name="cust_id" value="#cust_id#">
    <hr>
    <p>First Name: #first_name# Last Name: #last_name#
    Date Requested:<strong> #DateFormat(date_received, "MMMM D,
    YYYY")#</strong></p>
    <p>Fees Paid: <input type="checkbox" name="paid"
    value="#fee_paid#"></p>
    <p>Amount Paid: <input type="text"
    name="fee_amount" value="#fee_amount#"></p>
    <p>Receipt Provided: <input type="checkbox"
    name="paid" value="#receipt#"></p>
    <p>Staff First Name: <input type="text"
    name="staff_fname" value="#staff_fname#"></p>
    <p>Staff Last Name: <input type="text"
    name="staff_lname" value="#staff_lname#"></p>
    <p>Staff Phone Ext.: <input type="text"
    name="staff_ph_ext" value="#staff_ph_ext#"></p>
    <input type="submit" name="Submit" value="Submit" />
    </form>
    </cfoutput>
    <cfif IsDefined('form.paid')>
    Paid: #paid#
    <cfelse>
    Paid: No method of payment selected
    </cfif>
    Here is the update code:
    <cfquery name="change" datasource="#odbc_datasource#">
    SELECT *
    FROM customer_info
    WHERE cust_id = #cust_id#
    </cfquery>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
    charset=iso-8859-1">
    <title>Update Public Rercords Request Action
    Table</title>
    </head>
    <cfquery datasource="#odbc_datasource#">
    UPDATE customer_info
    SET fee_paid = '#paid#',
    fee_amount = #fee_amount#,
    receipt = '#paid#',
    staff_lname = '#staff_lname#',
    staff_fname = '#staff_fname#',
    staff_ph_ext = '#staff_ph_ext#'
    WHERE cust_id = #cust_id#
    </cfquery>

    I need to start with the box unchecked because the staff
    person editing the record is checking the box to indicate a payment
    was made. I modifed the code to use the cfparam tag:
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "
    http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
    <html lang="en-US">
    <cfparam name = "fee_paid" default="no">
    <cfparam name = "receipt" default="no">
    <cfquery name="pubrec" datasource="#odbc_datasource#">
    SELECT *
    FROM customer_info
    WHERE cust_id = #URL.recordID#
    </cfquery>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
    charset=utf-8">
    <title>Edit Form for Public Records
    Request</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    <cfoutput query="pubrec">
    <form action="update.cfm" method="post">
    <input type="hidden" name="cust_id" value="#cust_id#">
    <hr>
    <p>First Name: #first_name# Last Name: #last_name#
    Date Requested:<strong> #DateFormat(date_received, "MMMM D,
    YYYY")#</strong></p>
    <p>Fees Paid: <input type="checkbox"
    name="fee_paid" value="#fee_paid#"></p>
    <p>Amount Paid: <input type="text"
    name="fee_amount" value="#fee_amount#"></p>
    <p>Receipt Provided: <input type="checkbox"
    name="receipt" value="#receipt#"></p>
    <p>Staff First Name: <input type="text"
    name="staff_fname" value="#staff_fname#"></p>
    <p>Staff Last Name: <input type="text"
    name="staff_lname" value="#staff_lname#"></p>
    <p>Staff Phone Ext.: <input type="text"
    name="staff_ph_ext" value="#staff_ph_ext#"></p>
    <input type="submit" name="Submit" value="Submit" />
    </form>
    </cfoutput>
    </body>
    </html>
    Here is the update page that send the informaiton to the
    database:
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "
    http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
    <html>
    <cfquery name="change" datasource="#odbc_datasource#">
    SELECT *
    FROM customer_info
    WHERE cust_id = #cust_id#
    </cfquery>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
    charset=iso-8859-1">
    <title>Update Public Rercords Request Action
    Table</title>
    </head>
    <cfquery datasource="#odbc_datasource#">
    UPDATE customer_info
    SET fee_paid = '#form.fee_paid#',
    fee_amount = #form.fee_amount#,
    receipt = '#form.receipt#',
    staff_lname = '#form.staff_lname#',
    staff_fname = '#form.staff_fname#',
    staff_ph_ext = '#form.staff_ph_ext#'
    WHERE cust_id = #form.cust_id#
    </cfquery>
    <body>
    <cfoutput query="change">
    You <strong>edited</strong> the record for
    <strong>#first_name# #last_name#</strong>.
    </cfoutput>
    </body>
    </html>

  • How to make a category required for all files created within a folder

    I've defined a category. It has attributes which have been flagged as required.
    When I view the properies of a particular workspace (library), the category is shown as available to the workspace. However, the category is not shown as required. And the "required" checkbox is not clickable.
    So .. how, from the OCS DHTML applet, do I make a particular category a required category for all files in a folder?

    Perhaps the Category Attribute is not marked as "configurable" when it was created. You can check this by "switching into Admin Mode" and drilling down the Categories using "Manage Categories" link. Check if the category attribute is marked as configurable or not.
    Ravikiran

  • How to make Buyer and Planner fields in Master Items Form Required without

    How to make Buyer and Planner fields in Master Items Form Required without using personalization?
    1) Steps to Reproduce
    Under Application Developer Common Modules responsibility,
    1) Query Region MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS
    2) Click on Region Items
    3) Add Buyer Id and Planner Code attributes with Required checkbox checked.
    4) Bounce iAS server and JVM and clear java cache
    5) Changes not taking effect
    Current Application Release: 11.5.10.2 (3460000)
    Current INV Rollup: INV.J RUP22 (9878808)
    Current WMS Rollup: WMS RUP19 (9951502)
    Product Installation List :
    Product Installation: 11i.BOM.J: Installed
    Product Installation: 11i.EGO.E: Installed
    Product Installation: 11i.ENG.I: Installed
    Product Installation: 11i.INV.J: Installed
    Product Installation: 11i.PO.I: Installed
    Product Installation: 11i.WMS.G: Installed
    client needs to make the Buyer and Planner fields under Inventory->master Items form to be required.
    He tried using the Application Developer Common Modules responsibility, to find the Master Items Region and added the Buyer Id and Planner Code attributes with the Required check-box set to Yes. He bounced the iAS server and cleared java cache, but the changes do not take effect.
    client does not want to use form personalization.
    Can you please provide more assistance for using Application Developer Common Modules responsibility?
    Edited by: jemar98 on Aug 9, 2011 1:44 PM

    A forms developer could make those fields required with a CUSTOM.pll extension if you didn't want to use forms personalization. Both are considered customizations to standard functionality and may or may not require rework after patching or upgrades.

  • Fillable Forms with Required Fields

    So I know how to create a fillable form, but is there a way to force a user to fill out all of the fields on the form before they can save the form?  Any help is much appreciated.

    Thank you for the suggestions.  Clicking the required checkbox only highlights the field in red, it doesn't actually notify the user that the field is in fact required.  I don't think I'll be able to go the java script route.  I've done some research through Pro's help site and there doesn't seem to be any way to do this at this point in time.
    They should add this in the future!

  • V_V2 (Unconfirmed documents required)

    Dear SD Gurus;
    In the selection of V-V2, the client says that it doesnt work properly.Even if the sales order has confirmed quantity, after running the V_V2 with the selecion "unconfirmed documents required" selection, the program changes the schedule lines of V_V2.
    I wanted samples but not at hand at the moment.Can there such a case normally? I am not sure that the client can be wrong. But please suggest me if you have met such a case for this program up to now
    Many thanks in advance
    J.Black

    Dear Czaba;
    I am giving my answers below, thax for detail-explanation.
    1)
    You mentioned you have 3 sales order concerning that material.
    - please give the material number also on the selection screen
    - mark the "Unconfirmed documents required" checkbox (P_UNCONF).
    Do you get any SO? If yes, you should see at least 0 in "prev. confirmed qty" for one item.
    ***My answer:One of the 3 sales orders 1179669 has 200 CS for that material and "The prev confirmed qty" is zero for 23.12.2009 and 200 CS for 28.12.2009.So there exists zero qty as a 1st schedule line and old date.So the msae case for the second sales order. The 3rd sales order has already confirmed for 2 different dates and both schedule lines confirmed.Please confirm here that even if the schedule is confirmed for a future date and there exists zero qty for past date, this causes the 3rd sales order to seem and rescheduled again?
    2)
    You mentioned you have 3 sales order concerning that material. Do the sales orders have any other item that is not confirmed?
    If yes an
    - all items are confirmed for your material and
    - you do not specify the material number on selection screen
    and you run the report with "Unconfirmed documents required" seting you will get your already confirmed item iin the report. too.
    ***My nswer:You say that when we run the report without material but with "unconfirmed doc req", we can get already confirmed item.That's ok but not our case.
    As a conclusion, the functionality for the selection "unconfirmed doc req" means, even if the qty is confirmed in a sales order(manually or automatically), when we run the program V_V2, the already confirmed item of the 3rd salesorder for that material is rescheduled again.
    Please confirm my understanding here? But it seemed to call it as "unconfirmed doc req".because the 3rd sales order is already confirmed but it's processed/scheduled again.Maybe better to say "unconfirmed mat req" )) Isnt it?
    thanx for help
    Regards,
    Csaba
    Edited by: J.Black on Dec 25, 2009 9:37 PM

  • Hide required field

    Hi,
    I have some users in the system that only has "View" access to Funds. My problem is that these users are not allowed to view the "Target Amount" field on the Funds page. But since "Target Amount" is a required field, it is not possible to hide it in the Page Layout.
    Is it possible somehow to hide the field, or even just to hide/clear the amount, for specific users in the system.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Alex: I have tried what you suggested - it would also be my solution to the problem. So, I made a service request to Oracle and got the following reply.
    "Target Amount which is a currency field (system built) is not marked as required field in Fund field set up page. I wanted to suggest you to create a new page layout for fund and make the field 'Target Amount' not required by unchecking the checkbox in step 2 of Fund page layout. But, the checkbox gets automatically checked and then grays out making the field a required field in step 2 of new page creation. I am not sure why this field is grayed out and gets marked as required even though in field setup page Required checkbox is not checked for this field. So, after working on this issue, we have determined that we need to move the issue up to a Product Specialist to review and help resolve. At this time we suspect that the problem may need a patch to the product to resolve."
    So it seems to be an issue with the product!
    Anyway - Thanks for all your answers!
    br,
    Claus

  • BC Required field user prop in IC

    Hi,
    I have a problem with Siebel 8.0 I hope someone will be able to help me understand and fix.
    What I have :
    - 1 IO_out with some IC including "IC_One" and "IC_Two"
    - 1 BC (used by both IC) with some fields including
    -> Name
    -> Lnk_Name
    -> Lnk_Type
    -> Top_Expat (which contains a conditional "required" user prop)
    - 1 Link between this BC and itself over Name and Lnk_Name using an inter table on technical Id field
    In IC_One, all the four fields are declared ; in IC_Two, only Lnk_Name & Lnk_Type are declared.
    IC_Two is a child of IC_One.
    IC_One "Name" is created in the process while IC_Two "Name" have been created before. I made sure it does exists and contains all mandatory fields before calling the process.
    The issue is the following :
    When I call the process, an error appears saying that for IC_Two instance, required fields cannot be empty.
    The process should have created the new object corresponding to IC_One, then pick IC_Two and create a link between them using the inter table.
    I am sure the issue is around the BC field user prop "required" as for the purpose of testing I inactivated this user prop and checked the required checkbox on this field. This worked fine.
    I do not understand why Siebel would check user prop on this fields when it is not declared in the IC, and not check the required checkbox.
    Obvious notes :
    - I have to use the "required" field user prop. So using the checkbox instead is not an option
    - I simplified BC, and ICs description for the purpose of easier understanding
    - If you think this description lacks information or you would need further explication, I would gladly give any information/explication
    Thank you :)

    In the end the data coming in through the IC, gets saved in the BC layer.
    So you should add something to the expression to make sure it doesn't trigger the required clause.
    At some projects we have a dedicated login for interfaces, so you can check that in the required clause.
    But perhaps you have something else that is different between the web service and the rest of the application.
    I think there is some property to see if you are working in a User context, or in a server task context, but can't remember from the top of my head.

  • AutoInvoice - DFF not required but still returns error

    Hi all,
    We're using autoinvoice to import invoice from other system. We use several DFFs at the line (interface_line_attributes - context specific) as well as the header level (Header_attributes - using Global Data Elements).
    A couple of these DFFs are not mandatory - they're extra fields that can be used whenever we need to store more information on the transaction, otherwise they can be left blank. I have set them as not required (Required checkbox on the value set is unchecked), but whenever I leave these DFFs blank the system throws an error "All enabled segments of Transaction Flexfield must have a value". Is there any way to resolve this.
    Thanks

    What is your application release?
    Please see these docs.
    Troubleshooting Transaction Flexfields in AutoInvoice [ID 1077555.1]
    Setting Up Receivables Descriptive Flexfields [Video] [ID 1068344.1]
    You Must Supply Sales Credit Assignments For This Transaction [ID 334599.1]
    Line DFF Attribute15 Not Transferred To AR Autoinvoice Interface: RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL [ID 1266768.1]
    For TCS Why Auto Invoice Is Rejecting Transactions With Transaction Flexfield Must Have A Value [ID 1188738.1]
    Invoice Group Default Line Type not Working which Causes Autoinvoice to Fail [ID 1296066.1
    Thanks,
    Hussein                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Maybe you are looking for

  • Connecting a HP LaserJet 4P

    I have purchased a time capsule (500GB) serial number 6F8293CVYZV and I have an older HP LaserJet 4P serial number USCB012140. Could anyone tell me if I purchase a printer cable (USB to serial or parallel) will it work with the time capsule and HP La

  • Why wont Flash stay on my PC?

    Ok, I go to a website. The site says that I need to install Flash. I click the link and I install Flash. The Flash bar says that I have successfully installed Flash. Great! However, when I go back to the site it says that I havent got Flash Installed

  • Oracle 9i lite connection with a Java Client

    Hi, I would like to connect a Java Client developed using PersonalJava edition for PDA with an Oracle 9i lite version which is also on PDA. I would like to know is it possible to connect such a client (Java) using some JDBC drivers on PDA. if yes ple

  • 'Time' dimension hierarchy Required

    Dear all, We came across one requirement where 'Time' dimension having 365 days along with month, quarter, halfyear and yeartot as their ancestor. "Time" Dimension hierarchy: Time - Yeartot - Half year - Quarters - Months - Days Also we need alternat

  • Issue in BOM

    Hi Gurus I am trying to send the component(s) of a BOM from the  Quotation QT to the subsequent sales order ZOR. Higher-level item has item category TAQ Sub-items have item category TAE I allow the sub-item(s) to go to the subsequent sales order (QT