Result Analysis:

What is the difference between the Cost element data in the result analysis where we maintian the cost elements Gl accounts in RESULT analysis version with the G/l accounts or cost elements in the Line ID updating.
We maintain both these G/l accounts where would the posting of the result analysis happen.

Hi,
In the Line ID you need to maintain the GL Account range and posting rules for FI you need to maitain GL Accounts for respective Valuation methods.
S.Subbiah.

Similar Messages

  • Sales order item report based on results analysis key and status

    Hi,
    I am trying to find a a report to generate list of sales order items with following selection
            -invoicing status -invoiced/not invoices (other status)
            -result analysis key assigned to this item (VBAP-ABGRS)
            -system status /released/teco
    Basically i am CO consultant and not so familiar with the SD statuses. I tried VA05 and V.26 but all required selections are not available in these reports.
    If no standard report is available in ERP, i would like to have it in BI. Can some help me with table fields for statuses.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Raghu

    Hi Raghu
    Go to SE16 and give VBUK table and execute it there you can select the following feilds and then check wheather they are meeting your requirements or not.If they are meeting your requirements then create a new Z report by copying standard VA05 key feilds. and include the other feilds which you need.So you take your ABAP team help
    Billing status     FKSTK
    Posting Status  BUCHK
    Overall status  GBSTK
    Document category VBTYP
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

    Hello,
    I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
    Example:
    We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
    Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
    The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
    The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
    While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
    As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
    Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
    Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    Thanks Waman,
    I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
    Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
    Regards
    Peter
    Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

  • Problem with Result Analysis report (KKAK)

    Hello Experts,
    I am facing problem with T-code KKAK, when I am executing this transaction (Results Analysis (RA) on sales orders creates the data for posting to the GL, depending on the sales order (i.e. WIP or COS) ) system is displaying/calculating for all sales order which are already completed (fully shipped and billed), this report displaying in 300 to 400 pages.
    My requirement is  .. is it possible to display only sales orders which are no completed. This will help alot.
    Please help me to solve this problem.
    Thanks
    Sudheer

    Hi,
    in the selection screen of KKAK in "Output options" there is a flag "display closed items".
    Uncheck this and ensure that all completely processed orders have status closed (CLSD).
    Thus they will not be reported anymore.
    BR Christian

  • Results Analysis on Sales Orders

    Hi Fellows,
    When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
    However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
    I saw the help for this and it says
    " Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
    From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
    However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
    Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
    Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
    Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
    Thanks in advance..
    Srik

    Hi,
    Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
    Regards,
    P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

  • Post Cost of Sales in PS after Result Analysis

    Hi SAP experts,
    I'm testing SAP EC&O best practice solution at this moment.
    I executed KKAJ (results analysis) and both Cost of Sales and WIP were calculated correctly.
    COS: for a TECO WBS, which already have billing document
    WIP: for other WBS which is still in progress.
    I already saved this results analysis, however, when I execute settlement (CJ8G), I can only find the posting to FI of WIP. (Dr GL WIP account/Cr P&L WIP account). My expect is to have COS posted to FI as well (to recognize COS for the billing of completed WBS above).
    Kindly help me to figure out what I was missing here? I don't know at what step COS will be posted to FI. I searched all configuration document in Best Practice but cannot find any configuration for Results Analysis & Settlement for COS account.
    Thanks so much for your help.
    Andy

    Zeketa,
    Look this with an ABAP consultant, this is an development.
    regards.
    Bruno Araujo

  • Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

    In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element.  (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
    I configure a G/L account with no cost element.  KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element. 
    Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
    Failed solution:  I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number.  The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement.  I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
    I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined.  The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution.  I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order.  The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
    Question:
    Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

    It is more of a reporting issue really. 
    The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element.  This is the business process the users currently have.  Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly.  This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
    In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement.  Now that report no longer shows the settlement.  How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

  • Result Analysis - Profit Percentage based on Revenue

    Deare Gurus,
    While executing Result Analysis, we see profit percentage on the right side as percentage onthe basis of costs. We would like to view such detail as a percentage of revenue
    eg: standard
    Revenue - 100
    Costs - 80
    Profit - 20
    Profit percentage = 20/80 = 25%
    We want it to be 20/100 = 20%.
    Please help!!!!

    Hi Babu,
    I think your example is not totally clear. From what I understand, you need to calculate a result in percentage based on the result of two other columns. What you can do is to use the first result (from the two columns) as a CKF. And then, to this CKF, use the result calcultation options of the query desinger for percentage.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Diego

  • No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement

    No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.

    No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.
    i am asking at the time of  WIP calculation or settlement
    cost can be settled but does not generated any accounting document .

  • KKAX - error 'Manual WIP/results analysis is not allowed for order

    We are running KKAX on some process orders.  A few of them get the error 'there are values for cost element 999999 that are not assigned to any line ID'; however, we do have a line id set up for the cost element, etc; when we drill down further on the message, what we end up with is 'manual wip/results analysis is not allowed'.  The business transaction for this is KABM.  I can see on the order that KABM is not a permitted business transaction. 
    We only have this problem on a few of the orders.  How is the KABM being invoked?  Is it caused by an order status?  How can I fix this?
    Thank you

    Hi Christian
    i have come up with the new business requirement
    I want to change some of the material in one of the plant into discreete.For that, I tried to delete the production version and then tried to uncheck repetitive manufacturing indictor in MRP4 view.
    But it is giving the following error
    Either you are attempting to delete production version 1000 or
    you haveattempted to deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the production version.
    It is not possible to delete the production version or to
    deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the following reasons:
    o Cutoff period for WIP calculation has not yet been
    established. For the period in which a goods receipt was last entered with reference to this production version.
    o The cutoff period for variance calculation has not been
    defined for the full life of the production version.
    Can you please help me out how to resolve this issue

  • Result Analysis(WIP) not posted after 4 cycle run

    Hi,
    Every month value is posted in Result Analysis GL account for WIP. But we found in period 10 and period 11 value is not posted Result Analysis GL account after running 4 cycle run (Overhead calculation, WIP calculation, Variance calculation and Settlement). What may be reason ??
    Regards,
    Samrat

    Hi Christian ,
    One question related to Cut-Off period regarding WIP calculation which myself and Ajay were discussing 15 days  back..
    Is it required to change the cut-off everymonth when we calculate WIP . In my client.. then donot do that .. but still we calculate the WIP..
    Is the significance of cut-off period is to tell the system the first period to calculate WIP .. during implementation .. My client never changes that and its in a MTS ( Process Order Senario )... but calculates WIP every month.
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Change Result analysis key in WBS element

    Hi Friends,
    Is it possible to change result analysis key in WBS element?
    Any thoughts/suggestions would be welcome.
    Regards,
    Soumya

    Hi Soumya ,
    Changing an RA Key in a WBS Element is easy and it just any normal activity which one can do. But the important thing is that you will have to look at the potential repurcussions which will arise because of changing the RA Key. As long as both the RA keys have the same valuation method and other relevant settings , changing would be OK. If the Valuation methods are different then there would be inconsistencies in Financial Accounting as the computation of revenues / cost of sales would be differing.
    Excercise due caution .
    Regards,
    Venkat.

  • Differance amoung the Valuation Methods for Result Analysis

    Dear All,
    In SAP Product Cost Controlling ther are 3 types of Cosings
    1. Production Cost by Order
    Path:- Production Cost by Order ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for( Actual Cost)
    2. Production Cost By Period
    Path:- Production Cost by Period ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for ( Target Cost )
    3. Production Cost by Sales Order
    Path :- Production Cost by Sales Order ---> Period end Closing --->Defind Valuation Method for Result Analysis.
    Note:  Here the point is Valuation Methods ( 1 to 17 ) availabel in Production Cost by Sales Order only.  The Valution Method is very important to Calculate WIP.  Different Countries follows different methods, but in the By Order and By Period we can get these Valuation Methods.  What would be the reasno behind this.  
    Regards

    Dear All,
    Any one have any ieda

  • Result Analysis Valuation Method 3

    Hi PS Experts,
    The building block document on Profit Realization 'I58_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_DE' says that as per IAS 11 and 18, we need to configure Result Analysis Valuation Method 3 only which is cost based. Is it right and whether you are all having this valuation method in your SAP system where IFRS standards are applicable.
    Then, in addition to this cost based Revenue Recognition through this valuation method 3, we would like to input realistic POC(Engineer's certificate) into the system. Whether it is possible and if so, how and what other valuation method we need to use with or with changes to a particular valuation method. Appreciate your valuable inputs on this.
    Regards!

    Hello,
    Cost based POC i.e Method 3 is compliant with IFRS requirements. Other methods also are so.
    The choice of RA method depends on value/risk/duration/revenue plan of the project. We use this method for high value projects running for a long time where there is a need to recognise revenue before actual billing.
    Completed contract method is also used and very much in accordance with accouning principles.
    For POC calculated through progress determination- say Engineer's certificate- you can use method 7.
    Thanks,

  • Result Analysis Report

    Hi Friends..
    Pls tell me how to produce Result Analysis Report.
    By
    PARI VENDHAN.R

    Hi Pari,
    The Results Analysis Report is an analysis of the results of running tests. The results analysis provide management and the development team with a readout of the product quality.
    http://www.acomtech.com/resultsa.html
    Do reward if useful.
    Regards
    Harish

Maybe you are looking for