Results analysis for POC method with statistical cost element

Hi,
We are testing ETO (engineering-to-order) scenario With valuated
project stock and cost based POC RA method.
Inventory is updated during external procurement and we have used
statistical cost elements (Cost element category - 90) for inventory G/L.We want to use a
Result analysis method which considers this statistical cost elements
for calculating POC.For this purpose we have implemented SAP Notes
616960, 616869 and 78420.
In short, as per SAP note 616869, we created a customer enhancement
project for customer enhancement 5 of the results analysis (see Note
H78420). We copied the source code for customer enhancement 5 of the
correction instructions of note 616869 and then implemented SAP note
616960 to read the statistical actual costs.
Then we included the statistical cost as actual costs - Category K in
OKG4.
The system is doing POC and revenue in excess of billing calculation
correctly after taking into consideration the posted statistical cost.
During settlement of RA (CJ88), system is not giving effect to
inventory value. On settlement of RA, revenue should be recognized but
at the sametime the inventory represented by statistical posting should
be consumed(COS). The system should post a P&L posting which reduces
the inventory (representing statistical cost) and updates the actual
costs on settlement.
In our example, Statistical actual
posting is of USD 57150, planned revenue USD 100000 and POC is 70.27%.
Revenue in excess of billing comes to USD 70265.60. Recognisation of
revenue of USD 70265.60 is not correct as actual consumption is yet to
happen. The correct posting in FI should be revenue of USD 70265.60
along with COS of USD 57150.
Please suggest why on settlement the system is not posting the COS
along with revenue recognised?
Thanks,
BK

Hi Bijay,
We are in a similar situation in one project. Did you get any solution to the problem you posted here? If you can share it, please.
Regards,
Gireesh

Similar Messages

Results analysis: any way to exclude certain cost element from calculation?

Hi everyone!
We are implementing Results Analysis for projects. But the client is asking if there is a way to exclude some cost elements of the results analysis calculation. We are using method 07, POC based in the project milestones.
This is why they need this. They say that very often they they have costs higher to what they should be according to the month's billing. So they need to send the corresponding part to a WIP account. But not all the costs. They have internal costs (like the hours of internal resources) and external costs (like materials procurement or external services contracts). They only want to send to WIP the exceeding external costs. But leave all the internal costs in a cost account. So to do this we need to exclude these kind of cost elements (secondary cost elements) from the results analysis calculation. Is there any way to do this? Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Thalos.

Hi,
In OKG4, next to Line ID there is a field where you can set "N" which means not to include. Make this settinng for required cost elements / Line ID's and then test the changes.
Regards
Sreekanth

Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

Could be one of these possibilities:
1) Controlling Area set is wrong
2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
Assign Points if useful....

Results Analysis splitting POCS (Revenue Surplus)

I am not able to split POCS between two different GL Accounts. I am able to do it with VLRV with two different Line ID's; but can't do it with POCS.
On OKG2 Revenue surplus (POCS) is defined with cost element 982133.
On OKG4 I split revenue by the following
COArea Vsn RAKEY (RVD) (E) 982284    " Revenue Domestic
COArea Vsn RAKEY (RVI) (E) 982285     " Revenue International
On OKG5 I define the split of revenue accounts to RVD & RVI.
Account 311*** = RVD
Account 315*** = RVI
On OKG8 I am able to split VLRV to different accounts using cost element 982284 & 982285. I do not know how to define a split of POCS because it used the cost element 982133 from OKG2 and was not defined by my split in OKG4.
My KKAI / KO88 Settlement works to split VLRV, but POCS goes to the same account.
How can I split POCS value between two different accounts based on if the revenue was international or domestic (same as my split I used for VLRV)?

Hi,
RA categories POCS (Revenue surplus) is updated with an RA technical cost element customized in OKG2, not that from OKG4. As a result, when you specify in OKG8 a cost element different from that in OKG2, nothing is selected from settlement.
If you need to distribute such RA categories as POCS between the RA lind IDs to post to different G/L accounts, you can use the solution of the Note 38070. Please, read this Note carefully.
POCI and POCS is undated on the database under the respective RA technical cost elements defined in the definition of the RA version (transaction OKG2). The matter is that POCI and POCS cannot be distributed to RA line IDs in standard and, therefore, the customizing in OKG4 is not relevant for these RA categories. You have, however, the following workarounds.
1. Use the user exit 4 (see the note 67793). In this case you    can assign two different technical RA cost elements for two different   RA keys and, consequently, two different FI posting rules (OKG8) to   settle to different G/L accounts for projects and internal orders.
2. Use of the user exit 1 with the coding from the attached note 38070.   With this workaround POCI is updated as WIP on RA line IDs W00,   W=1, ... and POCS is updated as the reserves for unrealized costs   (RUCR) on these RA line IDs under the respective RA cost elements   defined in OKG4 for line IDs W00. W01....
regards
Waman

Results Analysis for Valuated Project stock

Hi,
To have transfer prices we have activated material ledger and multiple valuations.
As material ledger only works with valuated stock, we have moved the Project structure (ETO) from non valuated to valuated.
Our client requirement was to recognised revenue based on cost. With non valuated project stock, cost is upated as soon as we received the stock for the project and we were able to acheive the RA (revenue recognisition) as per the clients requirement.
However after changing to valuated, during goods receipt stock is upated and not cost. So we asked the client to consume the purchased material if they have to recognise the revenue.
Then the question came that if the SFG is received back from the assembly/production order, all of a sudden we will not have cost but revenue & stock. After looking some SAP notes on statistical cost elements, we have created the stock account as a statistical cost element (category 90) and implimented the following SAP notes which helped us to reverse the stock value and update it to P&L (by reading the balance in statistical cost element linked to the Project).
a) Note 78420 : To activate Function Module EXIT_SAPLKKAG_005 (contains include ZXKAGU05).This Function module takes into account the actual & plan costs of the assigned Production orders & Networks
b)Note 616869 : Provides source code to be copied to include ZXKAGU05
c)Note 616960 : Changes to include ZXKAGU05 to read statistical cost elements in RA
d)Note 26002 : To activate Function Module EXIT_SAPLKKAG_001 (contains include ZXKAGU01).In this include we can make the necessary modifications to RA calculations. Through this include, stock will be reversed during RA.
e)Note 785626 : Provides source code to be copied to include ZXKAGU01
Hower if we have purchased parts which are not consumed, still the RA (FM EXIT_SAPLKKAG_001) reads the value in statistical cost element and posts a debit to RA P&L and reverses the stock. Therefore now i have cost but no revenue (as no consumption).
As per last paragraph of sap note 785626, if we have purchased parts and we want to exclude them from stock reversal, we have to use a filter with customer enhancement 3 (SAP note 67423). It also says that the goods receipts and issues of purchased parts has to lead to a different valuation class and assigne a different stock accout. Now can any one give some guidance on how a project specific purchased parts (receipts and issues to prod order) can be linked to a seperated valuation class.
We have same material which is sometimes purchased and sometime produced.
Regards
Raghu.

Hi
I can say something from theory but not much from sap config. perspective. You have not mentioned actual revenue since POC is calculated from
R(a)/R(p).How you have considered 100% poc?
From your data,it looks to me that you have met the target revenue from actual cost which is less than planned one.Inventory indicates that you can generate revenue in next accounting period (unlike WIP).I feel that unlike plant stock,RA is not perfomed on project stock Murli, can ammend my view if it is wrong.
You can post this problem to Fi/Co.
Regards
Adwait

Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

Hello,
I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
Example:
We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
Thanks in advance
Peter

Thanks Waman,
I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

PO for stock with statistical WBS element

Dear colleagues,
My customer wants to create Purchase Orders for regular valuated plant stock with a statistical assignment to a WBS element, so they can report on the total procurement costs per project/WBS.
They do not wish to use project stock, because of the integration with Demand Planning in APO.
Does anyone have an idea if this is possible and if so, how to configure this? I am out of ideas.
Thanks in advance for any help in this matter.
Edith

are u posting to some other cost object also. normally they wud have to be posted to a COPA also with the cost element being 11 category.
the wbs will receive the statistical posting, so there needs to be a real object also.
see whether the real object is getting derived.
the system is nt finding the real object and trying to post with the WBS in real, but since its statistical, the error.
any other calrifications. plz post.
regards
anantha

Runtime analysis for a Method

Hi,
Need some help on how to find the Runtime Analysis for a method in Class, as i am getting some performance issues with the statements in the method.
Please let me know ASAP about this Runtime Analysis for a method in a class

In Runtime analysis Look for
ABAP - In your ABAP code
DATABASE - It shows the performance of your SELECT statements in your program.
Just check how much % it is showing for both.
Check for following in your code.
1) Avoid SELECT *
2) Clear internal tables values which are not required at the ending of program, as it saves memory
etc.

Results Analysis for Projects

Hi Guys,
We use Results analysis for projects and also we use RA in Product Costing.
Can anyone let me know what exactly does this Results Analysis mean ( not in SAP terms ).
I am trying to look for this over help.sap.com and google but could not find information on what exactly this term means.
Also how is this related to WIP?
Please clarify.
Thanks,
Srikanth.

Dear srikusap,
Calculation WIP through the SAP, RA key will play important role. Work in process calculation is diferent from industry to industry.
In SAP RA key will shows the WIP amount while u running KKAX Transaciton Code. After when ever u do the settlement then ti will be settled to Financial Account. At that time A Accounting Document was generaged. when ever the Order Status is Teco then the provious period WIP will be reversed.
Revert back if u any calrification.
Raj

Results Analysis for Sales Orders

Hi
When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
Msg Type: E
AppAr: KJ
MsgNo: 216
Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
Can any one tell me what might be the error..
Thanks in Advance..
Sivaram

Hi,
The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
- the delivery block of the order is set
- the billing block is set
- the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
- the position has been cancelled
- price condition is missing
In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
We often face this kind of issue
Good luck
Marian

Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
When i am trying to execute KKA1 I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
Message no. KJ240"
Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
Regards,

Hi,
The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
regards
Waman

Results Analysis for Contracts

Dear Experts,
My Client requires to do Results Analysis for Contracts. Please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Shareeq

Dear Ahemad,
In what would be the output of the result analysis ?I mean from sales point of view if u see then u will have to develop the report accordingly.
If you are talking abt the MM contract then there are some std reports available.
If ur talking abt the customer service point of view then we this std transaction IP51.
thanks and regards
raghav

How to execute Result analysis for a Single order?

HI,
I need to execute Result analysis for a single process order. But i found cumulative RA. Can any one provide the Individual Result analysis execution T.code?
Thanks
KB

Hi,
Use "KKAX"-->individual WIP calculation
"KKAO"-->Collect WIP calculation
Thanks,
Rau

[svn:fx-trunk] 5445: Fix for - @ copy tag for two methods with different arg lists not working.

Revision: 5445
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-19 17:47:57 -0700 (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Fix for - @copy tag for two methods with different arg lists not working.
Some changes for refactoring.
QE Notes: None.
Doc Notes: None.
Bugs: SDK-19975
tests: checkintests, asdoc
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19975
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/AsDocUtil.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/TopLevelClassesGenerator.ja va

Revision: 5445
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-19 17:47:57 -0700 (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Fix for - @copy tag for two methods with different arg lists not working.
Some changes for refactoring.
QE Notes: None.
Doc Notes: None.
Bugs: SDK-19975
tests: checkintests, asdoc
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19975
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/AsDocUtil.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/TopLevelClassesGenerator.ja va

Project System Cash Management in combination with statistical WBS element

Hi,
within a customer project, we have to solve the following issue:
Customer runs projects and statistical projects in combination with internal orders.
We want to use the PS Cash Management for planned and actual payments.
With statistical projects we have the following problem:
Invoice and actual payments will be processed with the transaction CJFN.
Actual payments are shown only on the internal order (transaction CJIA), but not on the statistical WBS element.
We want the information about the actual payments with in the project system reporting (S_ALR_87013574).
Projects, not flagged as statistical will deliver the expected results.
Many thanks for your ideas, to solve this problem.
Steffen

are u posting to some other cost object also. normally they wud have to be posted to a COPA also with the cost element being 11 category.
the wbs will receive the statistical posting, so there needs to be a real object also.
see whether the real object is getting derived.
the system is nt finding the real object and trying to post with the WBS in real, but since its statistical, the error.
any other calrifications. plz post.
regards
anantha

Results analysis for POC method with statistical cost element

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for