Retro Exemptions

Folks,
I am trying to create exemption Infotype T0582 (India) right from 01.04.2007 onwards, it returns “Changes not allowed for dates outside fiscal year”
Is it a standard that SAP won’t allow changes to be done retro for exemptions for the previous fiscal year? Any other work around?
Regards
KK

Hi,
I think,you might have exited from the march payroll,so that the fiscal year has changed to 2008.
Regards,
Manoj.

Similar Messages

  • /ZF5 and TDS Exemption is not coming for custom PF contribution

    Hi Friends,
    Need help regarding the custom PF deduction, requirement is
    IF GROSS - HRA < 6500 then *12%
    IF GROSS - HRA > 6500 then Only BASIC * 12%
    for this i written pcr and places in the schema also and in payslip PF amount's are coming correctly.
    Now my problem is PF Tax exemption i.e., Agg. of Chapter VI is not taking and if retro (any arrears) CF PF is not coming.
    can any one please tell how to get the Carry forward PF while in retro and PF exemption for TDS.
    please tell PCR and in which Schema i has to add.
    My Problem is CF PF is not coming and Exemption u/s 10 also not coming
    Screen shots for what i have done:
    PCR:
    SCHEMA:
    INN1 - Gross to Net Calculation
    INAL - Monthly factoring and storage (cumul.of gross amount)
    Thanks and Best Regards,
    Praneeth kumar

    Hi Friends,
    My requirement is for only one PSA - TANA, PF Basis amount has to check the wage types Basic (2100) and Additional Allowances (3800).
    logic is if Basic + Addl. Allowance is less than 6500, the 12% on Basic + Addl. Allownace
    if Basic + Addl. Allowance is greater than 6500, the 12% on Basic wage type only.
    I changed my PCR and while running the payroll, it is calculating the PF 12% and again 12% and storing in the wage types /3f1,/3f3......
    problem is, pcr is checking the /111 EPF Basis and according to logic it is multiplying 12% on that amount. but i want the result like check the EPF Basis and do according to logic and store the values.
    system behaving :
    Basic - 7727
    Allow - 1289
    total = 9016
    calculation: 7727*12% = 928
    system is calculating = 928*12% = 111
    PCR:
    Payslip:
    Best Regards,
    Praneeth kumar

  • For the mid month new joiner the annual Conveyance exemption is coming incorrectly

    Dear All,
    For one of our client, we have have faced a uniqe issue.
    If any employee join in the mid of the month, his prorated conveyance amount ( wage type 2020) is coming correctly. Suppose an employee joined at 16th of the month, system is calculating his conveyance for that month as INR 400 and which is correct.
    However in his tax calculation for that particular month, system is taking INR 400*(rest of the month of the FY) in the wage type /4E3. which is incorrect. Suppose he joined in 16th April , system is calculating tax exemption 400*12=4800
    Now if we run next month payroll ,  system is caculating the exemption properly. i.e. INR 400 + 800* rest of the month of the FY,
    Please help
    Regards
    Tirtha

    Hi Tirtha,
    system is calculating perfectly.
    first of all system check the no. of present days and accordingly it give the amount in the wage type /3C3 conveyance amount monthly and /3C4 will give Conveyance monthly exemption and it will multiply with no. of months to the fiscal year end and store in the wage type /4E3.
    for example check for PF:
    Every month PF amount store in WT /3F1 and send to /3F5 and this WT multiplied with No. of months and store the Annual amount in wt /3F6.
    Regards,
    Praneeth kumar

  • Issue Retro Payroll with currency

    Dear all!
    I have problem, i try to find out the reason but not succeed. I am using Payroll Schema running for employee in India, of course currency is INR. However I hired 1 employee with currency as USD. The rate 1 USD = 46 INR. Decimal of INR is 3 in V_CURX, but USD I cannot find in V_CURX, but check in basic pay is 2.
    If I run actual payroll for this PF on hiring period, there is NO issue. However because he joined after current payroll closed, so in next month we will run payroll for this guy. With my case, his previous salary is 1000 USD ( corrrect) and now is 3000 USD. So the Net pay in payslip is 4000 ( CORRECT). But the problem is Arrears in payslip, it not 1000, it show 10004610 (I guess multi 10 because of difference decimal) = 460000.
    As I know, currency in Basic Pay will be used and standard for this PF, but why running retro, it multi with ratr?
    Although Net Pay is correct, but if we send his payslip, he will confuse & may send why& why. Could you please help me to explain me why? and where I can check decimal ( I just found INR in V_CURX not USD).
    Your good answer will be appreciated!
    Please help me!
    Regards!
    Woody.

    Dear experts!
              Please help me to solve my problem above?
              And could you please just guide me how SAP retro in first period ( Hiring or rehiring) that employee is maintained in other currency not default currency & bring this value into next period?
              I am looking forward to receiving your replies!
              I already try to check the operation: ADDWTD1009 -> the value will be count as I mentioned in entry above, but when I use ADDWTE1009, the value is correct. Could you tell me the special logic when update value into Difference Table? maybe I guess there are some exceptions especially employee's currency deffer with Default currency.
    Regards!
    Woody.
    Edited by: minhnt on Sep 13, 2011 8:46 AM
    Edited by: minhnt on Sep 13, 2011 2:47 PM

  • Issue in Gratutity Exemption

    Dear Folks,
    Please advise, here is a scenario of exemption of grautity. The client is calculate grautity amuont manually and proces thru Addtional payment thru custom wage type.
    The amount of grautity is add to w.type /130 for exemption purpose. Accordingly I had wrote a pcr so that the amount of wage would store in /130, like this
       wage type.Gratuity Payment
         ELIMI *    Elim.time period ID
         ADDWT (gratuity wage type) OT   Output table
         ADDWT /416 OT   Output table
         AMT?350000 Comparison
           <
             ADDWT /130 OT   Output table
           =
             ADDWT /130 OT   Output table
           >
             ELIMI *    Elim.time period ID
             AMT=350000 Set
             ADDWT /130 OT   Output table
    But there is a issue, when we are executing payroll for next month, the exempted amount of gratuity is not adding.
    Please advise.
    Regards,

    Hi
    This can be done at the reporting level. Below link will help you solve this.
    http://www.wiseowl.co.uk/blog/s257/ssrs-rows-per-page-pt2.htm
    When you have multiple pages, your header may disappear. So below link will help you to have the header repeating in each page.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/19398.ssrs-how-to-repeat-headers-on-each-page.aspx
    Let me know how it goes.
    Cheers
    [email protected]
    Dr.Subramani Paramasivam

  • Income Tax Exemption on Professional Tax Deducted for Tamilnadu Employees

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on India Payroll and configured Professional Tax for Tamilnadu employees. Professional Tax is deducted correctly for the employee in the month of August and then in month of January.
    However while calcuating income tax exemption system is considering only amount deducted in the month of August for the exemption upto December month and in the month of January its cosidering PTax deducted in the month of August and January both. In case of Maharashtra employees form first month its considering annual projected Professional Tax amount for Exemption.
    Can anyone guide me what changes i have to do for considering projected PTax amount for exemption in case of Tamilnadu employees.
    Thanks in advance.
    OMKAR

    As per standrad the for chennai professional tax is projected for every six months right
    so it is takeing like that  say the entire amount will be upto to Projection period so it is takeing for that period
    We have similar issue at one of the client place that is instead of deducting the PTAX for every six months it has to be deducted
    for mothly so we have changed the frequnecy of deduction from six months to monthly so than it has shown the entire project amout yearly
    and  lets wait for the expert views on this

  • Issues in Conveyance Allowance amount in Exemption U/S 10

    New issues rise Now....
    For New (mid month) joinee at the first month Exemption U/S 10 is calculated based on the Conveyance Allowance amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax Exemption U/S 10 based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
    For example :
    Employee X,
    Joined date 15.08.2011,
    Conveyance Allowance = 800 INR. Earned Conveyance Allowance for 15 days = 400 INR.
    While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /130 Exemption U/S 10 = 3,200 (400*8). Based on this Conveyance Allowance The Exemption U/S 10 calculated, But I want to calculated the Exemption U/S 10 at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
    August month earned Conveyance Allowance = 400 INR + Actual Conveyance Allowance per month =800*7 =5,600.
    Exemption U/S 10 = 6,000 INR.
    Please give me some solution
    Thanks and regards
    Mohan .V
    Edited by: mohantamilan on Sep 23, 2011 5:27 PM

    Hi,
    I think for your earlier thread someone had replied that in the 1st month your calculations will be as per the actual received amounts for mid month joinees,however when you run the second payroll for this employee the system shall consider full attendance and Conveyance shall be 800 x remaining months + the already populated 400 in RT Tables.
    After you run the first Payroll live you can check the 2nd payroll with simulation may be this will clear your doubt.
    Salil

  • Coveyance exemption amout exiding the limit 9600

    Hi,
    We are facing a problem regarding Car and conveyance exemption in under section -10 . in the month exemtion is giving 9600 hundred but when we are running payroll for next month it is exdiing the limit and coming as 98100.We have analysed .
    /3c4 conveyance 01 01  = 1000 (conveyance amount exemption paid in that month)
    /3c3 convey amt              = 1000\
    /4e3  conveyance            = 9800
    actually it is coming like this.
    but it should come like
    /3c4 conveyance 01 01    = 800(conveyance exemption paid in that month)
    /3c3 convey amt              = 1000
    /4e3  conveyance            = 9600
    Kindly help
    Laxman

    Hi,
    You will have to iplemnt SAP Note and upgrade Support pack, see the link
    /4E3 (Annual Conveyance exemption is not coming correct)
    this will help you.
    Salil

  • Payslip display issue for retro periods of a wage type

    Hi,
    we have an issue with payslip display for the rate field of an wage type.
    we are genaearting the amount of a wage type 2000 using T511K constant. and we have changed the Rate of this constant in the mid of pay period.
    if we have split in WPBP then we are getting payslip display for old and new rate. which is fine.
    however if we don't have WPBP split for retro periods then payslip is clubbing the old and new rates hence the diaplay is wrong.
    ex: wrong dispaly for retro periods (08/2009 one record with RTE as 6 and for 09,2009 another record with RTE as 6)
    wage type          rate             number      amonut
    2000                   12                2                12      (rate should be 6 however it is diaplaying 12 as taking rate of 08 & 09,2009         periods where it is comg as 6+6=12 which is wrong)
    right dispaly should be
    wage type          rate             number      amonut
    2000                    6                   2                12      (rate should be 6, i.e 6*2=12)
    Thanks
    Gayathri

    Hi Gayatri,
    First check the values in payroll log or RT table. If its displaying correctly in RT table and if its problem with Payslip, then ask the abaper to debug the program.
    Also check the WPBP table in RT table, because as you told that if there are any changes in the mid of the month, then the amount may split.
    And if you have written any PCR for this, then check the PCR, whether its overwriting with any values.
    Just check the above points.
    Thanks & Regards
    Bharathi

  • Retro in Offcycle Payroll

    Hi,
    We have made a modification in one of the offcycle payment wage type.
    The issue is that this wage type has been paid during the offcycle period of April 2009 as well. We have ran retro calculation but the system is not taking retro for the offcycle payment.
    Please help.
    Regards
    Spardha

    HI
    Thanks for your reply.
    I tried the same but their is no change.
    I have taken the following steps:
    1. I have made the change in the Wage type cumulation for Ann non perk amount (/134) so that it can be included in the PERK CALCULATION.\ in Function INHRA
    2. I have delimited the entry for wage type from 01.04.2009 & ticked the PC 34 for cumulation into /134.
    3. This payment was made in the April 2009 offcycle run. I have ran forced retro from this date but I am unable to see the result in INHRA.
    Please can you guide me any further.
    Regards
    Spardha

  • Retro of offcycle payroll in Actual Payroll

    Hi Gurus,
    I have Executed offcycle payroll on 02.07.2009 for one employee and paid 1000. on 25.07.2009 i have executed regular payroll for that employee was fine. Now in august i have to pay regular salary as retro with effect from 01.07.2009. Now i have executed regular payroll for august and payroll result is showing three results.
    1) Retro of offcycle of 02.07.2009
    2) Retro of regular payroll for july
    3) Regular payroll for August.
    If i stop the retro in the actual Payroll for offcycle then there will is no RT created in case of retro from previous month for offcycle. In this case posting program thinks that we have incorrectly paid offcycle payment and when we do retro for previous period then amount those are actually paid and posted are reversed.
    Any comments on Issue

    Dear Muhammad Afrasyab,
    Please share as how you solved this problem.
    Thanks
    Prasanna Manikandan

  • HIRE Employee prev to the retro accounting period in payroll record

    Hi All,
    I have an issue when I try to hire an employee in the system. The system doesn't allow me to hire any employee before Nov 2009 as the retro accounting period for that payroll area is dated to 11 2009.
    The retro accounting period changed from 10 2005 to 11 2009, when it did not change for any other payroll area.
    Can anyone suggest a solution as how to hire an employee beyond this date?

    in one case we can perform this activity why the user will forget to hire an employee who got hired for the previous months
    U have to change the Retro date in the control record as per the isssue
    ask the client to use the system accurately  other wise deleting the control record is not good practice  in some cases we can do and we have to do
    but this above said shd not be the reason

  • Transferring the additional hours to current period during retro run

    Hi Experts,
    We are have Pension contribution plan in 0169 where wage type 9XXX that takes in total hours from /229 via custom PCR. . Then the hours are multiplied by a constant stored in table T511K. The problem is that suppose we have created a record for hours in IT 2010 for some previous period during the current run and want to reflect that change with the a retro run. i.e 97XX should take in hours from /229 in the current period plus those additional hours give in some previous period and reflect the same in the current period. And this not happening.
    E.g. In for period 04 say, we want the hours also that have in given additionally for in period 02. We have checked tables V_51P6_B as well as V_51P6_C for 9XXX and it's OK.
    Are we missing something here?

    Like other deductions (other than taxes), retroactive changes to the deduction amount should be carried forward to the current pay through tables DDNTK and ARRRS, since you can't change the Net Pay Amount of the previous pay.
    For retroactive changes to Payments, such as hours recorded in IT2010, the payment calculation will usually happen in the retroactive pay, Staturory Deductions (such as Income Tax) will be calculated and the resulting change in net income will be carried forward to the current pay.
    If the current calculation does not meet your requirements, you probably need to create a few PCRs to work around the problem.
    If possible, any variation in the value of /229 should be carried forwart to the current pay (through Output and Input WTs) before function P0169.
    The alternative would be to create a series of PCRs before and after that function so that the retroactive pay would always use the original value of /229 (without changing it's value in RT) and that the current pay's value of /229 would be modified temporarily to reflect the retroactive changes (without changing it's value in RT).

  • Problem in posting Er PF Wage Types generated through Retro

    Hello all,
    I am running India Payroll in ECC 6.0 with HR Package level 52.
    We have revised wages for two employees in the month of June with effect from 13.04.2010.
    Retro has run successfully for two months April & May and all the wage types are calculated and passed on for FI Posting correctly except Employer PF Wage Types.
    I am getting error while posting wages to FI as Employer PF Contribution & Employer Pension Contribution generated for April & May are not considered for FI Posting.  Only current month values are taken into account.  Whereas I don't have any problem with Employee Contribution.  /ZF5 is generated with total of past two months contribution and also passed on to FI.
    What might be the problem with Er PF Wage Types /3F3 & /3F4?
    We have not posted June salary till now due to above said posting error.  Now July Payroll is also started.
    Experts, please help me to sort out the issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Hema

    Hi,
    Thanks for quick reply.
    The error is "Posting balance not cleared".
    We have changed all the components including basic salary.  Payroll program has taken PF Basis correctly and calculated PF amounts, both for Employee & Employer contribution correctly for individual months.
    As I mentioned for all the three months Employee Contribution is considered for FI posting through regular wage type for current month and through /ZF5 for last two months.
    But for Employer Contribution only June amount is considered for posting even though the correct amounts are shown for other two months in RT (three lines for /3F3 & /3F4 each).
    Due to this, total amount for Balance Sheet Accounts is less where as Expense Accounts is shown higher as Employer Contribution is not considered for April & May, causing imbalance in Accounting entries.
    GL Accounts are mapped correctly.  Otherwise even the current month amount will not be carried to FI.
    Hope my explanation is clear.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hema

  • Re: Arrears is getting formed twice during retro run

    Hi Team,
    Request your Kind help urgently.
    In one of my support client I am facing a problem with deduction Wage type.
    Scenario is: An employee is eligible to purchase the company share up to 10% .
    - The eligibility will be maintained in I T14 with a wagetype using  %
    - It will calculate on 10% of basic every month and share will be deducted from his pay.
    - But if any Loss of pay is there it will calculate as per is working days.
    For example,
    - In case of changes in the basic in the month of May which is updated in the month of July, when you run the July payroll from payroll driver is running retro for both period that is May to July and gives the output correctly.
    And executed the regular payroll until December.
    But in January when updated IT0581 from 01/04/2010 to 31/12/9999, here when you run the January payroll run, again share purchase amount is getting calculated (twice) which should not happened, since share purchase has already calculated in the month of July(May to July) and the same amount is deducted (twice)
    The calculation is happening when process of arrears is formed
    Please let me know how can I stop system calculating twice share purchase. Should I write any rule or something else can be done.
    Thanks  & Exepcting your help
    Vidya

    Could this help you friend:
    If you whish the payroll system only to evaluate certain aspect of the payroll in orginal period then in the particular payroll scheme where it is evaluted add an IF statement in Function and the "O" value in the PAR2, next line to process your PCR and ENDIF statement after that.
    So if period is orginal then evaluate whatever. Else. Read from previous result. Endif.
    Greetz.

Maybe you are looking for