Retrospective changes to Org Assignment
Hi,
Is it possible to disallow users from carrying out retrospective changes in organizational (re)assignment? Is there some configuration in SPRO to be carried out or do I have to activate some user exit?
Regards
>> I have to activate some user exit?
YES.. you can do it with the User exit ZXPADU02 or the BAdI HRPAD00INFTY as I dont think you can do this via config..
~Suresh
Similar Messages
-
Hi Experts
I have a requirement to assign org unit to the User via position. We are already live with the data. A user is already assigned to a orgunit. I have to change the org assignment. As we do in PPOMA_BBP manually, is there any FM or BAPI where I can pass the user name & Org unit.
In PPAOM_BBP we delete the assigment of the orgunit to Position and agian assign a new orgunit to the position of the user.
I need a code which can do the same.
Quick response will be appreciated.
Many Thanks,
PrasadHi. I can't find a function module, but you can use transaction PP01 to move a position to a new org unit instead. Just maintain the "relationships" infotype.
You can then do a call transaction or use ECATT to mass maintain the data.
Regards,
Dave. -
HR/ORG Assignment Integration issue
Hello All,
Basically I am not HR consultant .wondering if we are missing sap standard configurations.
We are following below steps to over come this issue which is really not advisable.
1) We lock the transaction: PPOME
2) We import transport following transport.
Object list of request
Comment entry: Released
PDMK924635 20070714 122520 NATT
HRDSYS: Logical information object client-dep. table E
SEGR_PLOGIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA___0VVV
SEKZ_ORGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA___1VVV
HRDSYS: physical information object client-dep. table E
355DC851BE6F0973E10000009B38F850
355DC852BE6F0973E10000009B38F850
355DC97CBE6F0973E10000009B38F850
355DC97DBE6F0973E10000009B38F850
Table contents
T77S0
T77S0
220PLOGIORGA
T77ST
220EPLOGIORGA
3) User will change some entries in PA30 (not sure what entries).
4)Import Original configuration
Object list of request
Comment entry: Released
PDMK925883 20071115 133627 NATT
HRDSYS: Logical information object client-dep. table E
SEGR_PLOGIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA___0VVV
SEKZ_ORGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA___1VVV
HRDSYS: physical information object client-dep. table E
355DC851BE6F0973E10000009B38F850
355DC852BE6F0973E10000009B38F850
355DC97CBE6F0973E10000009B38F850
355DC97DBE6F0973E10000009B38F850
View maintenance: Data
V_T77S0SC
T77S0
220PLOGIORGA
T77ST
220EPLOGIORGA
5) Unlock PPOME
Please give some solution regarding this issue. I am happy to provide more details regarding this. I am not sure which details are really required for your investigation.
Thanks in advance .
Kind Regards
RajHi Dianna Perron ,
Thanks for your update, I think it is quite difficulty to check the config in the transport i am sorry for this .
I got full history of this issue.
- It was the issue with integration between HR and Org assignment.
1)
There was a requirement to make cost canter field a input field on HR master as this could be used by PD resources in reporting. This was achieved by switching off the integration between Organisational Management/HR via Transport config.
2)
By doing above could maintain the cost canter field with relevant cost centers for watch HR record in PA30.
3)
Users reported few errors (Error screen you can see attached Screen 1) that there was some issue how the integration between HR and Org assignment is behaving. This was sorted out and the integration between HR and Organisanol Management was activated by transport .by activating this (step 2 PA30) again Cost Canter field Greyed please find Screen 2)
4) Because of the above issue we are deactivating the config with one transport and then again activating one transport.
Please let me know if you want to check the configs kindly provide me SPRO Path the i will provide
Kind Regards
Raj -
Org Assignment of global employees in Compensation Management
I have a problem with Compensation Management but it also relates the Org Assignment of global employees
In Comp when I try to submit an employee using transaction HRCMP001, I have an error saying no org assignment exist on 01. 01 .2008.
The business scenario is as follows. EE is hired on 01012008 in UK for e.g. he gets terminated on 31.05.2008 and then gets re-hired in another country using the Global Employee Personnel actions on 01.06.2008. In this county, he becomes eligible to receive the increase but when I try to submit, the error comes up that no org assignment exist for 01.01.2008. I have changed the settings in T582A to u2018copy infotypeu2019, it tries to reference the previous org assign infotype from 01.01.2008(which is correct but the system rejects it and will only accept the new date of the new hire 01.06.2008) thereby not referencing the old org assignment in the new personnel number.? I tried the propose infotype option but it did not do anything. Does any one have any suggestions? Thanks ever so much for your anticipated help.You create the compensation packages using info type 0706. This info type has
Two subtypes; one for home country and one for host country
Check this link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/32/79c73c0c52085be10000000a114084/content.htm -
How to undo Org Assignment?
HI,
We would like to change the start date of ORG assignment in PA30, but when i tried to delete the assignment for a pertivcular period in PA30>goto>Overview> selected the entry.
but wsystem is showing an error," Organisational Assignment created via Organisational Management"
Please let me know where i can go delete the selected entry.
Thanks in Advance,
R.B.ParamshettyHi,
Copy the org. Assignment u want.
Change the start date.
This will help in resolving ur issue
Cheers -
Regarding Org assignment record create/delete
Hi All,
I have created a postion and assigned a holder , as i have doen mistake in period creation i have deleated that position , and created a new postionand holder with correct period.
but in org assignment infoype 0001 these old and new record got saved.Is there any possibility to deleate thsi record.
RegardsHi
Do remember that whenever an OBJECT ID start date is wrong, try to correct it with the program. RE_RHBEGDA0. This will correct the start date of the OBJECT IDs.
I think, the new record is in 0001 - Organisational Assignment.
1) Try to delete the first record, then go to delete the wrong entry record.
2) Try to change the first record with the date of the wrong entry date, so that it will get delimited.
Regards
Team Member. -
PSM-FM-Reversal of funds management document after change in acc.assignment
Good day we recently went live with a component of Funds Management i.e. Availability Control on Cost centers and cost elements. We update BCS with the plan values and actual/commitment items in Finance/CO. We do our planning in CO.
The solution is working reasonably well but we have encountered a problem for which we are unable to find a solution. The problem is best illustrated with an example;
1. Create purchase requisition with Account Assignment Category "K" = Cost Center with transaction ME51N
2. Account assignment = cost center and cost element. A funds management document is created upon saving of the transaction.
3. Purchase Req. is released with a release strategy (transaction ME54N)
4. After purchase requisition release the account assignment for the cost element is changed by the user. This occurs sometimes during the execution of the business process.
5. When a purchase order is created with reference to this purchase requisition with transaction ME59N the system references the original funds management document which means when the account assignment was changed the funds management document was not reversed and a new funds management document created for the changed account assignment.
6. The BUDCON report transaction FMRP_RW_BUDCON thus displays the commitment under the incorrect commitment item as the change in account assignment is not reflected in Funds Management. We have a one to one relationship between cost elements/commitment items and cost centers/funds centers as per the derivation strategy.
My question is;
Is this normal standard SAP standard behavior or are we missing some configuration that will enable the creation of a new funds management document and if so where do we configure such? I must mention our solution is completely SAP standard.
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards
Mike Olwagen
Manager SAP Solution Support
City Power (JHB) (Pty) LtdHi Mike, nice to meet you.
I think u should do an entire test with TRACE on, and u will find the problem, and how to fix it (at FMDERIVE of course).
First: Have a look at note [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322], go to FMDERIVE and turn ON the trace.
Then, run all the process ... from ME51N to the end...
I agree with Eli, u must allow overwriting of existing values at FMDERIVE rule...
Regards,
Osvaldo. -
Budget Exceeded error while changing in Account Assignment
Hi,
The user is facing an error while changing the Accounts assignment category to "Assets" in a PR. The PR was created with AAC as "U" for all the line items. The user is changing that to "A". After that he provides the asset number then the error is coming as below:
Item 010 Order 0809/A15 budget exceeded
Message no. BP604
Diagnosis
In document item 010 Order 0809/A15, budget for fiscal year 2010 was exceeded by 6,630.00 INR.
The valuation price for that particular line item is Rs 6630.00. I have not changed the other line items.
Need the suggestion.
JKI think there some settings in Budgeting, n Finance people are more familiar with those settings. Normally, if u craete a Purchasing doc. PR or PO or GR/ IR from MM side, with account assnt., the relevant budget()which is created for that commitment item) will updated with the document value. There may be settings with delivery date or so. check with your FI guys
umakanth -
Consignment Deliveries: Handling Unit Changes to Non Assigned HU
Hell Experts,
We are having an issue with the consigment deliveries. After doing the PGI, the handlling unit assignment changes to Non Assigned Handlling Unit.
Situation Before PGI:
VEKP-VBOBJ = 01
VEKP-VBOBLKEY = <Delivery Number>
After PGI: (Movement Type Used is 631)
VEKP-VBOBJ = 12 (Non Assigned handlling Unit)
VEKP-VBOBJKEY = <Delivery Number>
The handlling unit is assigned to the delivery but the field VBOBJ changes to 12. We could see the handlling unit in the delivery but the assignement is not 01. Logically, the field VBOBJ should be 01. (Because we are able to see these HU in delivery).
If I reverse the PGI, then VBOBJ again changes to 01. Also, if I pack all the material into one HU and leave another HU empty then after PGI, VBOBJ for empty HU is 01 but for packed HU it is 12 (with VBOBJKEY = Delivery Number)
I don't know why the assignment is 12? Are we missing anything?
Thanks,are u already solved this issue ? can u please tell me how to solve it ? and I why the assignment turns into 12 ?
thanks
regards
Henny -
Org.Assignment Infotype start date and End date is getting wrong.
Hi, When i create a new employee in PA40, in Org. Assignment infotype start date and end date is getting wrong. for eg. When i create an employee on 01.04.2014. In org. assignment infotype its getting like this. 01.01.2014 to 31.03.9999 and 01.04.9999 to 31.12.9999 Two date entries are creating by default.
Hi
Check in the Table - T588Z : Dynamic Actions ,is there any custom routines causing the defaulting dates functionality.
Thanks,
Sreeram -
Missing BP Userid from Org Assignment
Hi all,
Was wondering if this has happened to anyone else. We are using CRM 5.0 and R/3 4.7.
We are creating our employees in R/3 using PA30 and transferring BP's to CRM using PFAL P- for person, personnel number and update.
After we have assigned the employee to the org as a bp but loose the user id occasionally leaving the user without the ability to log in to the IC web Client. It just disappears from the BP and from the Org assignment.
Has this happened to anyone else?
MaggieThank you - we have resolved the issue this way.
You are correct in that when you transfer an employee from R/3 to CRM using PFAL you must consider the insert vs. update mode. An insert mode will delete all relationships to the org and update will not.
We also found that if the office in the org is not complete with a business partner assigned it will also contribute to the instability of the the position and employees assigned.
Lastly we modified table T77SO using SM31 and value HRALX PQUAL - X.
Doing all these things has kept our employees assigned to the org.
Maggie -
Text or GREP find/change method to assign tags
Hi all
I could use a text or GREP find/change method to assign tags to paragraph styles (for use in FindChangeByList), would anyone be able to help please?
SteveHi Peter
I produce a quarterly magazine for which text is supplied in Word format.
I currently run the 'FindChangeByList' script to format body text, headings, bulleted and numbered lists, web and email address text styling and to remove/correct all extraneous characters etc.
Once the job is printed I need to produce a tagged 'accessible' readable (eg: read out loud function in Acrobat) pdf from the file, for text to speech readers.
I am currently using the map tags to styles function, which allows me to assign tags which in turn gives me control of the 'text reading' order.
What I'd like to be able to do is automatically apply the Tags to syles while processing the 'FindChangeByList' script.
Steve -
Regd. workflows and org. assignment
Hi,
Most of us would know PPOC and org. assignment used in workflows. What I want to know is, this org. assignments do they differ in the way they are built if we use SAP HR in our system. If so how do they differ, it is going to be the same PPOC isn't it.
Regards,
VijayHello,
In my opinion they do not differ. It are the same HR objects. So techinally there is no difference i think. -
How to change a account assignment in and cost distrubution on cost center
Hi Expert
Can any one let me know how to change the account assignment and cost distribution on the cost center.
When I am going to change it I could see it is grayed out . Why it is so .Is there any configuration for this in view that
no body can change the account assignment.
Regards
NTTHi
As per me system will not allow to change you account assignment in Po
for additional info check following link
[Change of Account Assignment in PO while adopting released PR.;
Regards
kailas Ugale -
Hi,
i'm not able to change the default Assignment Owner (massive) in the Checked-out Enterprise resource pool in Project Professional 2013.
I've also unlocked the "Windows account edit" in the Register Editor.
Do you know if is this possible or i have to change it for each resource one by one???
Thanks
Best regards
Daniele
DanieleHello Daniele,
I think what you are seeing is by design behavior. Per below article you can set the Default Assignment owner in Project Web Access and it appears in various places in Project client.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/project-help/default-assignment-owner-resource-field-HA010167482.aspx
If you want to set the same default assignment owner for multiple resources then you can try bulk edit option in resource center.
Hope this helps.
Thank you,
Kiran K.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I recently noticed this and it's been driving me crazy; when I view photos in Photoshop CS5 they appear significantly lighter/more washed out than when viewed in other programs like Zoombrowser, Digital Photo Professional or just in a regular Windows
-
ABAP QUERY: Obligatory selection fields
Hello, I have created an ABAP QUERY and i can't find a way to make any of the selection fields obligatory. Is this possible? Regards
-
Dynamic String Substitution in Eclipse with JSP
Hi folks, I'm wondering if it is possible to dynamically change token for ant that are present in my jsp with the dynamic string substitution in jsp inside tomcat. Right now, I'm loading the bootstrap with my runner and pointing to my application. In
-
Can i have pse 6 and pse 12 on the same computer?
I installed pse 12 and now i can't access my pse 6 with all of my actions and stuff...help
-
Upgrading Photoshop and getting onto new laptop
I have Photoshop CS4 Student Edition on my current laptop and it came with 2 copies (you could put it on 2 computers), but I've had to put both my copies on the laptop because I upgrade my OS at one point from Vista to Windows 7 and the first copy go